Abstract
Background
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) causes systemic inflammatory response and ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury.
Objective
To investigate the effect and mechanism of simvastatin on myocardial injury in cardiac valve surgery with CPB.
Methods
One hundred thirty patients were randomly assigned to the statin group (n = 65) or control group (n = 65). Simvastatin was administered preoperatively and postoperatively. Duration of intensive care unit stay, duration of assisted ventilation, and left ventricular ejection fraction were recorded. Plasma was analysed for troponin T (cTnT), isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8). Ultrastructure of the myocardium and autophagosomes were observed. Beclin-1, LC3-II/I, P62, AMPK, and the phosphorylation of AMPK in cardiomyocytes were detected.
Results
Simvastatin significantly reduced the duration of assisted ventilation (P = 0.030) and ejection fraction was significantly higher in the statin group (P = 0.024). Simvastatin significantly reduced the levels of cTnT, CK-MB, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 (P < 0.05), reduced the expression of LC3-II/LC3-I and Beclin 1, and increased the expression of phosphorylation of AMPK. Simvastatin reduced the generation of autophagosomes and the ultrastructural injuries to myocardium.
Conclusion
Perioperative statin therapy reduced myocardial injury by regulating myocardial autophagy and activating the phosphorylation of AMPK. The registration number of this study is ChiCTR-TRC-14005164.
1. Introduction
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is used in most open-heart surgeries. However, CPB inevitably causes systemic inflammatory response and ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, which can negatively affect postoperative cardiac function and a patient's long-term prognosis [1].
Recent clinical studies have reported that using statins during the perioperative period can limit inflammation and oxidation, reduce cardiac muscle injury, and improve the patient's prognosis [2–4], but the dosage, duration, effects, and mechanisms associated with these outcomes are not clear. Some studies have demonstrated that statins can induce cell autophagy [5]. IR injury and inflammatory response can substantially activate cell autophagy [6], and autophagy has been demonstrated to play an important role in the pathologic process of cardiac muscle injury [7]. However, few studies have revealed the effects of perioperative oral simvastatin on post-CPB changes in cardiac muscle autophagy or the influence of the degree of autophagy on postoperative cardiac function and prognosis [8, 9].
The present clinical randomized controlled trial explored the protective effect of perioperative simvastatin on cardiac muscle after CPB and the relationship of such effects to cardiomyocyte autophagy.
2. Methods
2.1. Patients
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. To estimate the group size, a pilot study was conducted for measuring the serum cardiac troponin T (cTnT) at 6 h after surgery in 10 patients who received statin and placebo treatment (ratio 1 : 1). The mean of the cTnT in statin and placebo groups was 830 and 995, respectively. For our sample size calculation, we assumed an equal standard deviation which was 300 at 6 h after surgery among the groups. With α = 00.05, two-tailed and a power of 80%, we needed 52 patients per group. Considering a compliance rate of 80%, we asked 130 patients to participate in this study [10]. Included were 130 patients with valvulopathy who underwent surgery with CPB in the department of cardiac surgery at our hospital from February 2013 to December 2014. Patients provided written informed consent and were randomly divided into 2 groups (65 in the simvastatin group and 65 in the control group) by assigning random numbers from a random number table.
Patients in the simvastatin group took simvastatin 20 mg orally daily during two perioperative periods: from the 7th to the 5th preoperative day and from the 2nd day after decannulation until the 7th postoperative day. Patients in the control group were given a placebo at the same dosage.
Patients in the simvastatin group took simvastatin 20 mg orally daily during two perioperative periods: those who received simvastatin for 5~7 days before the planned operation [11] and from the 2nd day after decannulation until the 7th postoperative day.
Exclusion criteria were the following: (1) coronary heart disease; (2) allergy to simvastatin; (3) active hepatitis and/or severe renal impairment (serum creatinine > 200 μmol/L); (4) pregnancy or lactation; (5) taking medication(s) that may increase the effective concentration of simvastatin (e.g., a tetralol-derived calcium-channel blocker such as mibefradil); and (6) hyperlipidemia.
Patients who needed to stop or reduce the dosage of simvastatin because of side effects, such as transaminase elevation, were removed from the study. A patient could voluntarily exit the study at any time, and reason(s) for exiting and data collected to that point were recorded. Women of childbearing age were required to use contraception; however, simvastatin was immediately discontinued if pregnancy occurred.
2.2. Anesthetic and Operative Methods
Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg, propofol 0.3–0.5 mg/kg, fentanyl 3–5 μg/kg, and rocuronium bromide 0.6 mg/kg and was maintained with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and rocuronium bromide.
All patients were managed on by the same operating team. A mid-sternal incision was made and, after systemic heparinization, CPB with mild hypothermia was applied using a Stockert extracorporeal circulation machine and membrane oxygenator. Lactated Ringer's solution with 5% human serum albumin was used as a priming solution. Perfusion was maintained at 50–70 mL·kg−1·min−1, and mean arterial pressure was maintained at 50–80 mm Hg. Ice was put on the surface of the heart to reduce the temperature. After clamping the aorta, cold oxygenated-blood potassium-containing cardioplegia was perfused into the root of the ascending aorta. If the aorta was clamped for longer than 30 min, cardioplegic solution was reperfused to protect cardiac muscle. After the circulation was opened and the heart resuscitated, a pulmonary artery catheter was inserted into the right ventricle and a temporary epicardial pacemaker wire was placed on the heart's surface. After the surgery, the patient was transferred, intubated, to the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.
2.3. Clinical Data and Sample Collection
Data recorded were age, weight, duration of CPB, duration of aortic clamping, 24 h postoperative urine output and volume of thoracic cavity drainage, duration of use of vasoactive agents, and duration of intensive care unit stay.
A 5 mL blood sample was taken from a central vein 6, 12, 24, and 72 h and 7 d pre- and postoperatively. Each sample was placed in an anticoagulative tube or treated with heparin before hypothermal ultracentrifugation to separate serum for measurement. Measurements included inflammatory indices (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-6 [IL-6], and interleukin-8 [IL-8]) 6 h pre- and postoperatively, and cardiac muscle impairment indices (serum cardiac troponin T [cTnT] and creatine kinase myocardial-band isoenzyme [CK-MB]) 6, 12, 24, and 72 h pre- and postoperatively.
2.4. Tissue Sample Indicator Measurement
Approximately 100 mg of auricula extra tissues was sampled from each patient before CPB and 30 min after opening the aorta. About 50 mg was quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored in a −80°C freezer for Western blotting measurement of the autophagy-related proteins Beclin-1, LC3-II/I, P62, AMPK, and p-AMPK. The remaining 50 mg was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution, embedded in paraffin, and sliced vertically into 4 to 6 μm thick slices for immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of Beclin-1 and P62. In addition, 1 mm3 of the sample was excised and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for observation under a transmission electron microscope (TEM).
3. Statistical Analysis
SPSS for Windows, Version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. All numeric values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t-test was used for intragroup comparison. ANOVA for repeated measurement was used for intergroup comparison, and numeric values were verified using the chi-squared test. Differences with a P value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
4. Results
4.1. Simvastatin Significantly Improves Perioperative Mechanical Ventilation and Cardiac Function
One hundred thirty patients were randomly assigned to either the simvastatin group or the control group; 110 patients completed the study (56 in the simvastatin group and 54 in the control group). There were no significant differences in clinical indicators (age; sex; height; weight; cardiac function rating; preoperative ejection fraction; blood lipid levels before taking, and after stopping, the medication [or placebo]; duration of CPB; and duration of aortic clamping between groups) (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1.
Simvastatin (n = 56) | Control (n = 54) | P value | |
| |||
Gender (male/female) | 20/36 | 22/32 | |
Age (year) | 56.1 ± 11.1 | 51.4 ± 12.9 | 0.131 |
Weight (kg) | 56.8 ± 7.9 | 58.6 ± 8.7 | 0.245 |
Height (cm) | 161.4 ± 6.3 | 163.4 ± 5.9 | 0.094 |
CPB duration (min) | 115.4 ± 28.7 | 110.8 ± 36.8 | 0.464 |
Aorta clamping duration (min) | 79.2 ± 22.26 | 73.9 ± 29.6 | 0.296 |
Atrial fibrillation (persons) | 14 | 12 | 0.847 |
Diabetes (persons) | 2 | 3 | 0.742 |
Ejection fraction EF (%) | 60.32 ± 14.97 | 60.2 ± 6.61 | 0.958 |
Cardiac function (NYHA class) | 0.704 | ||
I | 3 | 4 | |
II | 14 | 15 | |
III | 38 | 33 | |
IV | 1 | 2 | |
Blood lipid level | |||
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.56 ± 0.90 | 4.79 ± 0.84 | 0.171 |
Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.15 ± 0.32 | 1.26 ± 0.29 | 0.056 |
Low density lipoprotein (mmol/L) | 2.65 ± 0.56 | 2.78 ± 0.48 | 0.187 |
High density lipoprotein (mmol/L) | 1.21 ± 0.24 | 1.24 ± 0.31 | 0.469 |
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; NYHA: New York Heart Association.
Table 2.
Operation | Simvastatin group (56) | Control group (54) |
| ||
AVR | 9 | 9 |
MVR | 20 | 24 |
MVP | 3 | 4 |
AVR + MVR | 6 | 3 |
AVR + MVP | 1 | 0 |
MVR + TVP | 12 | 7 |
MVR + TVR | 1 | 2 |
MVP + TVP | 1 | 1 |
MVP + TVR | 0 | 1 |
AVR + MVR + TVP | 3 | 3 |
AVR: aortic valve replacement; MVP: mitral valve plasty; MVR: mitral valve replacement; TVP: tricuspid valve plasty; TVR: tricuspid valve replacement.
Nine patients in the simvastatin group left the study for the following reasons: two developed severe liver function abnormality after surgery, five failed to take the medication for the specified number of days, one underwent repeat thoracotomy, and one died while staying in the ICU. In the control group, eleven patients left the study: two developed severe postoperative liver function abnormality, five failed to take the medication for the specified number of days, two exited the study voluntarily, one underwent repeat thoracotomy, and one died while staying in the ICU.
There were no significant differences in 24 h urine output, 24 h volume of thoracic cavity drainage, and duration of ICU stay between groups. The duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter in the simvastatin group (P = 0.030). By the 10th postoperative day, left ventricular ejection fraction had decreased in both groups but was significantly smaller in the control group (P = 0.024). In both groups, serum lipid concentrations were smaller than before medication administration, but there were no significant differences between groups (Table 3).
Table 3.
(a).
Group | Duration of assisted respiration | 24 Hr average urine volume | 24 Hr total drainage | Duration of staying in ICU |
EF 10 days after operation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(h) | (ml/h) | (ml) | (h) | (%) | |
Simvastatin group | 9.92 ± 3.42∗ | 127.73 ± 41.02 | 770.18 ± 244.79 | 40.18 ± 13.19 | 58.9 ± 8.48∗ |
Control group | 11.69 ± 4.79 | 114.77 ± 35.84 | 823.33 ± 313.10 | 43.17 ± 13.98 | 55.5 ± 7.03 |
t | −2.208 | 1.761 | −0.994 | −1.152 | 2.290 |
P | 0.030 | 0.081 | 0.322 | 0.252 | 0.024 |
(b).
Group | Total cholesterol | Triglyceride | Low-density lipoprotein | High-density lipoprotein |
---|---|---|---|---|
(mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | |
Simvastatin group | 4.01 ± 0.94 | 1.03 ± 0.32 | 2.47 ± 0.58 | 1.10 ± 0.20 |
Control group | 4.18 ± 0.85 | 1.14 ± 0.30 | 2.60 ± 0.49 | 1.19 ± 0.29 |
t | −1.057 | −1.876 | −1.224 | −1.906 |
P | 0.293 | 0.063 | 0.224 | 0.059 |
∗ P < 0.05 compared with control group. EF: ejection fraction; ICU: intensive care unit.
4.2. Simvastatin Significantly Reduces the Levels of Myocardial Injury Indicators
Preoperatively, indices of cardiac muscle injury, serum CK-MB and cTnT, were similar between groups and low levels. Postoperatively, serum CK-MB and cTnT both increased dramatically, reaching peak concentration 6 h after the operation and then gradually decreasing. Serum CK-MB and cTnT were significantly lower in the simvastatin group than in the control group at all time points after the operation (Figure 1).
4.3. Simvastatin Significantly Reduces the Levels of Inflammatory Markers after CPB
Blood inflammatory cytokines were similar between groups preoperatively. However, 6 h after CPB there were clear increases in all three inflammatory markers in both groups, with the increases significantly smaller in the simvastatin group than in the control group for IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α (P < 0.05) (Figure 1).
4.4. Simvastatin Significantly Reduces the Levels of Postoperative Myocardial Autophagy
Western blotting assays showed that, after ischemia reperfusion during CPB, cardiomyocyte autophagy was activated in both groups. Although Beclin-1, LC3-II, and LC3-II/LC3-I ratios increased in both groups, increase was significantly greater in the control group than in the simvastatin group (P < 0.05). P62 decreased in both groups but the decrease was significantly higher in the control group than in the simvastatin group (P < 0.05). This indicates that activation of autophagy after CPB was suppressed to some extent in the simvastatin group. Total protein content of AMPK was roughly equal between groups, but the degree of phosphorylation of AMPK was significantly greater in the simvastatin group than in the control group (P < 0.05), demonstrating that simvastatin activated the phosphorylation of AMPK (Figure 2).
IHC revealed the expression of autophagy-related proteins (i.e., Beclin-1 and P62) and that, in both groups, the expression of Beclin-1 protein increased and that of P62 protein decreased after ischemia reperfusion during CPB, suggesting the activation of cardiomyocyte autophagy. However, results also showed that the expression of autophagy-related proteins was significantly higher in the control group than in the simvastatin group, confirming that simvastatin can suppress further activation of autophagy after CPB (Figure 2).
Preoperatively, cardiomyocytes were observed under TEM to contain large numbers of mitochondria with a dense matrix, neatly aligned cristae, and enormous glycogen granules. After operation, it could be seen that the cardiomyocyte was seriously injured, with most mitochondria having a swollen matrix and cristae that were shortened, shrunken, or absent. Also, the number of organelles, including glycogen granules and mitochondria, greatly decreased, with a large number of autophagic bodies or autophagic lysosomes at the different stages. Simvastatin can significantly reduce the levels of postoperative myocardial autophagy (Figure 3).
5. Discussion
TNF-α, the initial factor in an inflammatory response [12], plays a key role in inflammatory response because it can stimulate the release of other inflammatory factors. IL-6 and IL-8 are important cell factors that drive inflammatory response and tissue injury [13]. TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 concentrations usually peak in the first 6 h after surgery and can reflect the level of post-CPB inflammatory response and change [14]. Our study results show that, although IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α (and, thus, inflammatory response) increased significantly for 6 h postoperatively in both groups, the increase was significantly lower in the simvastatin group. From our results, it can be seen that oral administration of simvastatin can effectively suppress the occurrence and progress of post-CPB inflammatory response.
CK-MB and cTnT are indicators that are clinically used to reflect cardiac muscle injury; they have high specificity and sensitivity and correlate well with the degree of injury [15]. The greater concentrations of CK-MB and cTnT after CPB directly reflect cardiac muscle injury in both groups, but these were less severe in the simvastatin group.
Our clinical results also showed that taking simvastatin during the perioperative period can noticeably shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and improve left ventricular ejection fraction postoperatively. This translated to moderate improvement in the short-term prognosis of the simvastatin group. Our results also demonstrate that taking a statin during the perioperative period can provide some protective effect to cardiac muscle in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement. Moreover, no blood lipid abnormalities were seen in either group preoperatively and there was no significant change in blood lipids postoperatively, suggesting that the protection provided by statins during the perioperative period is independent of their ability to reduce blood lipids.
Cardiomyocytes are nonregenerative cells and must therefore maintain a low level of autophagy to remove damaged intracellular structures, which are important for the regulation of cardiomyocyte impairment and aging [16]. In CPB-induced stress states, such as oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial impairment, and inflammatory response [17, 18], cardiomyocyte autophagy can be strongly activated [19]. A number of autophagies can eventually lead to autophagic death of the cardiomyocyte, which has been shown to be a probable key cause of the programmed death of cardiomyocytes under stress states [6]. In a study by Matsui et al. [6], Beclin-1+/− hybridized mice showed lower levels of cardiomyocyte autophagy and a smaller area of infarct during reperfusion with decreasing Beclin-1 level. Pattingre et al. proposed that, regardless of whether autophagy leads to the death of a cell, it usually depends on the balance between Beclin-1 and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) genes, which can suppress each other [20]. Bcl-2 can suppress death caused by reactive oxygen species [21], while Beclin-1 has a structural domain that prompts apoptosis [22, 23]. Thus, large activation of Beclin-l during reperfusion suppresses the expression of Bcl-2 and eventually causes the cell's autophagic death. These studies results [16, 23] indicate that suppressing autophagy can reduce cardiac muscle injury.
Our Western blotting assay results indicated that, after CPB, the autophagy-related proteins in the patient's auricula dextra tissue, such as LC3-II/LC3-I and Beclin-1, increased while P62 decreased, which is a clear sign that cardiomyocyte autophagy was activated. At the same time, we found that the autophagy level for simvastatin group was noticeably lower than that of the control group, indicating that simvastatin suppressed cardiomyocyte autophagy after CPB. This was further confirmed by our IHC detection results. By observing the microstructure of cardiomyocytes with TEM, we also found that the cardiomyocytes of patients in the control group were more severely injured, with a swollen matrix; broken or absent mitochondrial cristae; significantly decreased number of organelles, including mitochondria; and significantly increased number of autophagic vacuoles, than those of the simvastatin group. From this, we infer that a great deal of cardiomyocyte autophagy was activated after CPB and that the level of autophagy was positively correlated with the extent of cardiac muscle injury. However, simvastatin may have mitigated cardiac muscle injury by suppressing cardiomyocyte autophagy.
A previous study concluded that statins reduce cell apoptosis mainly by activating AMPK signal path under conditions of in vitro hypoxia and a serum-free system [24]. In the present study, we detected the phosphorylation level of AMPK in cardiac muscle tissue and found that the level of phosphorylation of AMPK was higher in the simvastatin group than in the control group. The AMPK signal path is important in adjusting the body's energy metabolism and has been demonstrated to play a key role in IR injury of cardiac muscle. For example, in the event of ischemia and hypoxia, it can optimize cardiac muscle energy metabolism by increasing the ingestion of glucose and oxidation of aliphatic acid and suppressing the synthesis of proteins and consumption of ATP [25]. The AMPK signal path can also resist oxidative stress and suppress endoplasmic reticulum stress while reducing inflammatory factor TNF-α to suppress inflammatory response [26, 27]. Oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and inflammatory response are the main causes of induction of cardiomyocyte autophagy in ischemia reperfusion; therefore, we believe that simvastatin may be able to suppress cardiac muscle autophagy and protect cardiac muscle by activating AMPK.
In summary, our results demonstrate that oral administration of simvastatin during the perioperative period effectively mitigated injury caused by CPB, possibly by suppressing cardiac muscle autophagy, and consequently improves the prognosis of patients.
6. Limitations
This study has several limitations. First, this study was a short-term follow-up study of the efficacy and mechanism of preoperative simvastatin therapy. Unfortunately, there was a lack in partial follow-up information and we failed to assess the long-term prognosis. Second, the changes of autophagy protein levels in cardiomyocytes after cardiopulmonary bypass were found; however, the changes of autophagy-related upstream signaling pathways were not further studied. Third, the present study lacks the data of postoperative indicators of atrial fibrillation and renal insufficiency.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC no. 81771165), the Natural Science Foundation Project in Guangdong Province, China (Grant no. 2016A030313295), the Major Project Development and Emerging, Interdisciplinary Funding Projects of Sun Yat-sen University (Grant no. 15ykjc17b), and Guangzhou Science and Technology Project of Major Special Research Topics on International Collaborative Innovation (Grant no. 201704030032). Statistical consultation and support were provided by Sun Yat-sen University medical statistics.
Contributor Information
Ping Hua, Email: huaping88@sina.com.
Songran Yang, Email: yangsongran@126.com.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors' Contributions
Ping Hua, Songran Yang, and Jianyang Liu designed the study, collected the clinical data, performed the statistical analysis, participated in the operation, and drafted the manuscript. Jun Tao, Xifeng Lin, Rongjun Zou, and Dingwen Zhang participated in the operation and revised the article. Ping Hua and Jianyang Liu contributed equally to this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
- 1.Giomarelli P., Scolletta S., Borrelli E., Biagioli B. Myocardial and lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass: Role of interleukin (IL)-10. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2003;76(1):117–123. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00194-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davignon J. Beneficial cardiovascular pleiotropic effects of statins. Circulation. 2004;109(23, supplement 1):III-39–III-43. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131517.20177.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kuhn E. W., Liakopoulos O. J., Stange S., et al. Preoperative statin therapy in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of 90,000 patients. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2014;45(1):17–26. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martínez-Comendador J. M., Alvarez J. R., Mosquera I., et al. Preoperative statin treatment reduces systemic inflammatory response and myocardial damage in cardiac surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2009;36(6):998–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang J., Yang Z., Xie L., Xu L., Xu D., Liu X. Statins, autophagy and cancer metastasis. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2013;45(3):745–752. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matsui Y., Kyoi S., Takagi H., et al. Molecular mechanisms and physiological significance of autophagy during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Autophagy. 2008;4(4):409–415. doi: 10.4161/auto.5638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dong Y., Undyala V. V., Gottlieb R. A., Mentzer R. M., Jr., Przyklenk K. Autophagy: definition, molecular machinery, and potential role in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2010;15(3):220–230. doi: 10.1177/1074248410370327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lewicki M., Ng I., Schneider A. G. HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for preventing acute kidney injury after surgical procedures requiring cardiac bypass. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;(3) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010480.CD010480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sabe A. A., Elmadhun N. Y., Sadek A. A., Chu L. M., Bianchi C., Sellke F. W. Differential effects of atorvastatin on autophagy in ischemic and nonischemic myocardium in Ossabaw swine with metabolic syndrome. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2014;148(6):3172–3178. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pua H. L., Lerman J., Crawford M. W., Wright J. G. An evaluation of the quality of clinical trials in anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(5):1068–1073. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sabe A. A., Elmadhun N. Y., Dalal R. S., Robich M. P., Sellke F. W. Resveratrol regulates autophagy signaling in chronically ischemic myocardium. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2014;147(2):792–799. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang Y., Kawamura N., Schmelzer J. D., Schmeichel A. M., Low P. A. Decreased peripheral nerve damage after ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice lacking TNF-alpha. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2008;267(1-2):107–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Slotwinski R., Slodkowski M., Pertkiewicz M., et al. Dynamic of IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations in patients after surgery treated with total parenteral nutrition. Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski. 2002;12(67):45–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chello M., Patti G., Candura D., et al. Effects of atorvastatin on systemic inflammatory response after coronary bypass surgery. Critical Care Medicine. 2006;34(3):660–667. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201407.89977.EA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hedström E., Åström-Olsson K., Öhlin H., et al. Peak CKMB and cTnT accurately estimates myocardial infarct size after reperfusion. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2007;41(1):44–50. doi: 10.1080/14017430601071849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakai A., Yamaguchi O., Takeda T., et al. The role of autophagy in cardiomyocytes in the basal state and in response to hemodynamic stress. Nature Medicine. 2007;13(5):619–624. doi: 10.1038/nm1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.de Vries D. K., Kortekaas K. A., Tsikas D. Oxidative damage in clinical ischemia/reperfusion injury: a reappraisal. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2013;19(6):535–545. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Xia J.-G., Xu F.-F., Qu Y., Song D.-D., Shen H., Liu X.-H. Atorvastatin post-conditioning attenuates myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury via inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stressyrelated apoptosis. Shock. 2014;42(4):365–371. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matsui Y., Takagi H., Qu X., et al. Distinct roles of autophagy in the heart during ischemia and reperfusion: roles of AMP-activated protein kinase and beclin 1 in mediating autophagy. Circulation Research. 2007;100(6):914–922. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000261924.76669.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pattingre S., Tassa A., Qu X., et al. Bcl-2 antiapoptotic proteins inhibit Beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Cell. 2005;122(6):927–939. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Susnow N., Zeng L., Margineantu D., Hockenbery D. M. Bcl-2 family proteins as regulators of oxidative stress. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2009;19(1):42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oberstein A., Jeffrey P. D., Shi Y. G. Crystal structure of the BCL-XL-beclin 1 peptide complex: beclin 1 is a novel BH3-only protein. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282(17):13123–13132. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m700492200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maiuri M. C., le Toumelin G., Criollo A., et al. Functional and physical interaction between Bcl-XL and a BH3-like domain in Beclin-1. EMBO Journal. 2007;26(10):2527–2539. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Song L., Yang Y.-J., Dong Q.-T., et al. Atorvastatin protects swine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from apoptosis through AMPK but not PI3K/Akt pathway. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2011;39(11):1033–1038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hwang J.-T., Kwon D. Y., Park O. J., Kim M. S. Resveratrol protects ROS-induced cell death by activating AMPK in H9c2 cardiac muscle cells. Genes & Nutrition. 2008;2(4):323–326. doi: 10.1007/s12263-007-0069-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tao J., Zhu W., Li Y. Apelin-13 protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury through inhibition of ER-dependent apoptotic pathways in a time-dependent fashion. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2011;301(4):H1471–H1486. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00097.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McGaffin K. R., Witham W. G., Yester K. A., et al. Cardiac-specific leptin receptor deletion exacerbates ischaemic heart failure in mice. Cardiovascular Research. 2011;89(1):60–71. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]