Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to establish the weighted inequalities of the oscillation and variation operators for the multilinear Calderón-Zygmund singular integral with a Lipschitz function.
Keywords: oscillation operator, variation operator, multilinear operator, Lipschitz function
Introduction and results
Let K be a kernel on . Suppose that there exist two constants δ and C such that
| 1.1 |
| 1.2 |
| 1.3 |
We consider the family of operators given by
| 1.4 |
A common method of measuring the speed of convergence of the family is to consider the square functions
where is a monotonically decreasing sequence which approaches 0. For convenience, other expressions have also been considered. Let be a fixed sequence which decreases to zero. Following [1], the oscillation operator is defined as
and the ρ-variation operator is defined as
where the sup is taken over all sequences of real number decreasing to zero.
The oscillation and variation for some families of operators have been studied by many authors on probability, ergodic theory, and harmonic analysis; see [2–4]. Recently, some authors [5–8] researched the weighted estimates of the oscillation and variation operators for the commutators of singular integrals.
Let m be a positive integer, let b be a function on , and let be the th Taylor series remainder of b at x expander about y, i.e.
We consider the family of operators , where are the multilinear singular integral operators of ,
| 1.5 |
Note that when , is just the commutator of and b, which is denoted by , that is to say
| 1.6 |
However, when , is a non-trivial generation of the commutator. It is well known that multilinear operators are of great interest in harmonic analysis and have been widely studied by many authors (see [9–13]).
A locally integrable function b is said to be in Lipschitz space if
where
In this paper, we will study the boundedness of oscillation and variation operators for the family of the multilinear singular integral related to a Lipschitz function defined by (1.5) in weighted Lebesgue space. Our main results are as follows.
Theorem 1.1
Suppose that satisfies (1.1)-(1.3), , , where δ is the same as in (1.2). Let , and be given by (1.4) and (1.5), respectively. If and are bounded on for some , then, for any with , , and are bounded from into .
Corollary 1.1
Suppose that satisfies (1.1)-(1.3), , , where δ is the same as in (1.2). Let , and be given by (1.4) and (1.6), respectively. If and are bounded on for some , then, for any with , , and are bounded from into .
In this paper, we shall use the symbol to indicate that there exists a universal positive constant C, independent of all important parameters, such that . means that and .
Some preliminaries
Weight
A weight ω is a nonnegative, locally integrable function on . The classical weight theories were introduced by Muckenhoupt and Wheeden in [14] and [15].
A weight ω is said to belong to the Muckenhoup class for , if there exists a constant C such that
for every interval I. The class is defined by replacing the above inequality with
When , we define .
A weight is said to belong to the class , , if
It is well known that if , then .
Function of
The function of has the following important properties.
Lemma 2.1
Let . Then
- for any ,
Maximal function
We recall the definition of Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator and fractional maximal operator. The Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator is defined by
The fractional maximal function is defined as
for . In order to simplify the notation, we set .
Lemma 2.2
Let and . Then
for all f such that the left hand side is finite.
Lemma 2.3
Suppose , , . If , then
Taylor series remainder
The following lemma gives an estimate on Taylor series remainder.
Lemma 2.4
[10] Let b be a function on and for any . Then
where is the interval .
Oscillation and variation operators
We consider the operator
It is easy to check that
Following [4], we denote by E the mixed norm Banach space of two variable function h defined on such that
Given , where defined as (1.4), for a fixed decreasing sequence with , let and define the E-valued operator by
Then
On the other hand, let . We denote by the mixed norm space of two variable functions such that
We also consider the -valued operator given by
Then
Next, let B be a Banach space and φ be a B-valued function, we define the sharp maximal operator as follows:
Then
and
Finally, let us recall some results about oscillation and variation operators.
Lemma 2.5
([5])
Suppose that satisfies (1.1)-(1.3), . Let be given by (1.4). If and are bounded on for some , then, for any , ,
and
The proof of main results
Note that if , then . By Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 2.3, we only need to prove
| 3.1 |
and
| 3.2 |
hold for any .
We will prove only inequality (3.1), since (3.2) can be obtained by a similar argument. Fix f and with an interval . Write , and let
Then
Therefore
For , , let , let , and let . By [10] we have for any .
By Lemma 2.5, we know is bounded on for . Then, using Hölder’s inequality, we deduce
Then
Since , then, applying Hölder’s inequality and Lemma 2.1, we get
We now estimate . For , we have
For , let , let , and let . Note that
By Minkowski’s inequalities and , we obtain
From the mean value theorem, there exists such that
For , , we have and . By Lemma 2.4 and Lemma 2.1 we get
Then
Since ,
For , since , ,
and
Thus
As for , due to
and noting , we have
Notice
and by (1.2),
Similar to the estimates for , we have
Similar to the estimates for , we have
Then
Finally, let us estimate . Notice that the integral
will be non-zero in the following cases:
-
(i)
and ;
-
(ii)
and ;
-
(iii)
and ;
-
(iv)
and .
In case (i) we have as . Similarly, in case (iii) we have as . In case (ii) we have and in case (iv) we have . By (1.1) and taking , we have
Then
Notice
Choosing with , we have
But
and
Therefore
Similarly,
This completes the proof of (3.1). Hence, Theorem 1.1 is proved.
Authors’ contributions
The authors completed the paper together. They also read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Yue Hu, Email: huu3y3@163.com.
Yueshan Wang, Email: wangys1962@163.com.
References
- 1.Campbell JT, Jones RL, Reinhold K, Wierdl M. Oscillation and variation for the Hilbert transform. Duke Math. J. 2000;105:59–83. doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-00-10513-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Akcoglu M, Jones RL, Schwartz P. Variation in probability, ergodic theory and analysis. Ill. J. Math. 1998;42:154–177. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Crescimbeni R, Martin-Reyes FL, Torre AL, Torrea JL. The ρ-variation of the Hermitian Riesz transform. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 2010;26:1827–1838. doi: 10.1007/s10114-010-9122-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gillespie TA, Torrea JL. Dimension free estimates for the oscillation of Riesz transforms. Isr. J. Math. 2004;141:125–144. doi: 10.1007/BF02772215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu F, Wu HX. A criterion on oscillation and variation for the commutators of singular integral operators. Forum Math. 2015;27:77–97. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang J, Wu HX. Oscillation and variation inequalities for singular integrals and commutators on weighted Morrey spaces. Front. Math. China. 2016;11:423–447. doi: 10.1007/s11464-015-0462-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang J, Wu HX. Oscillation and variation inequalities for the commutators of singular integrals with Lipschitz functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2015;2015:214, 21 pp.. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang J, Wu HX. Weighted oscillation and variation inequalities for singular integrals and commutators satisfying Hörmander type condition. Acta Math. Sin. 2017;33:1397–1420. doi: 10.1007/s10114-017-6379-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cohen J. A sharp estimate for a multilinear singular integral on . Indiana Univ. Math. J. 1981;30:693–702. doi: 10.1512/iumj.1981.30.30053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cohen J, Gosselin J. A BMO estimate for multilinear singular integral operators. Ill. J. Math. 1986;30:445–465. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ding Y, Lu SZ. Weighted boundedness for a class rough multilinear operators. Acta Math. Sin. 2001;17:517–526. doi: 10.1007/s101140100113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lu SZ, Wu HX, Zhang P. Multilinear singular integral with rough kernel. Acta Math. Sin. 2003;19:51–62. doi: 10.1007/s10114-002-0224-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen WG. A Besov estimate for multilinear singular integrals. Acta Math. Sin. 2000;16:613–626. doi: 10.1007/s101140000059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Muckenhoupt B. Weighted norm inequalities for the Hardy maximal function. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1972;165:207–226. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1972-0293384-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Muckenhoupt B, Wheeden RL. Weighted norm inequalities for singular and fractional integrals. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1971;161:249–258. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1971-0285938-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
