Abstract
Ischemic stroke (IS), the leading neurology cause of death and disability worldwide, is influenced by gene polymorphisms. To explore the association between IS and Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene polymorphisms, a case–control study containing 513 IS patients and 514 controls without IS was conducted in a Northwest China Han population. MassARRAY iPLEX system was applied to determine the APOE polymorphisms according to the alleles of two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of APOE, rs429358, and rs7412. The results showed that rs429358 and rs7412 were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in both cases and controls groups. APOE ε4 allele, ε4/ε4 genotype, and ε4-containing genotypes were associated with IS. According to the results of Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification system, APOE ε2 allele, ε4 allele, and ε4/ε4 genotype were associated with large artery atherosclerosis IS subtypes. In addition, the results also indicated that the ε4 allele related to undetermined IS and ε4/ε4 genotype was related to small vessel disease IS. Compared with subjects with non-ε4-containing genotypes, the total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level in blood and the proportion of cardiopath history were higher in all subjects with ε4-containing genotypes. Besides, the triacylglycerides (TG) level in blood was higher in controls with ε4-containing genotypes. In conclusion, in a Northwest China Han population, APOE ε4 allele was associated with blood lipid level. The TC and LDL levels were the independent risk factors for IS. APOE was a risk gene for IS, but not independent, especially for large artery atherosclerosis IS.
Keywords: Apolipoprotein E, gene polymorphisms, Ischemic stroke, Neurology
Introduction
Stroke is the leading neurology cause of death and disability worldwide [1]. In China, the annual mortality rate of stroke is approximately 157 per 100 000, which has accounted almost 20% of all death. China has 2.5 million new stroke cases and 7.5 million stroke survivors in each year [2]. According to the research conducted by China National Stroke Registry, ischemic stroke (IS) was a predominant stroke subtype in China, which accounted for 66.7% [3]. As a complex heterogeneous disease of multiple etiologies and major clinical manifestations, IS not only associated with kinds of traditional risk factors but also influenced by the gene polymorphisms [4]. Therefore, many candidate genes which may be related to IS, for example Apolipoprotein E (APOE), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), histone deacetylase 9 (HDAC9), human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and so on, have been studied by researchers [5–8].
APOE gene locates on 19q13.2 and encodes an important protein which has vital functions in lipid metabolism. The APOE gene has three alleles (ε2, ε3, and ε4) that encode three isoforms (E2, E3, and E4) protein. The three alleles of APOE gene form six genotypes (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε2/ε4, ε3/ε3, ε3/ε4, and ε4/ε4), of which, the ε3/ε3 is the most common genotype in China. The three isoforms of APOE protein have one amino acid difference at positions 112 and 158, and have variance of protein function and affinity to lipid and receptors [9]. Compared with ε3, ε4 allele was associated with increased risk for a variety of pathologies, for instance, neurological conditions, cerebrovascular diseases, Alzheimer’s disease [10], IS [11], and atherosclerosis [12]. ε2 allele was reported as a protective factor with a lower risk for dementia [13], and it was also associated with longevity [14,15]. However, studies on the association of APOE and IS have produced conflicting results [16–18], which may be caused by the differences of the methodology used and the populations included.
A stroke belt was found in Northwest China with the high stroke incidence [19]. Many researchers focused on the study of risk genes for IS, but the results are still not sufficient in this area. Therefore, we performed a case–control study in a Northwest China Han population to investigate the association between IS and APOE gene polymorphisms.
Materials and methods
Subject recruitment
This case–control study recruited 1030 subjects from January, 2011 to December, 2013 in the second hospital of Lanzhou University. The subjects of cases and controls group were enrolled from the department of neurology and physical examination center respectively, both of the two groups included 515 subjects. The 515 subjects in cases group were diagnosed as IS by two senior neurologists according to the criteria of the Chinese Medical Association in 1995 and the criteria amended in the fourth National Cerebrovascular Disease conference, with confirmation on clinical symptoms or signs, laboratory results, and computerized tomography scan (CTS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The subjects who underwent physical examination from January, 2011 to December, 2013 in The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University and did not have cerebrovascular diseases and other serious neurological diseases were included in the control group. The subjects in control group without IS were performed medical history material collection, physical examination, and head imaging examination (CTs or MRI) to determine the cerebrovascular diseases and other severe neurological diseases. In addition, the patients with severe liver and kidney diseases were also excluded from the participants in the present study. In genotyping process of APOE, three DNA samples were not detected successfully, so we excluded them from the following analysis, including two IS patients and one control participant. The average age of cases group (294 males and 219 females) and control group (288 males and 226 females) were 62.26 ± 12.16 and 61.66 ± 13.49 respectively.
Participants completed a series of clinic examinations which included a medical history interview, physical examination, and auxiliary tests. Some risk factors for IS were recorded, including hypertension (a systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, and/or patients were receiving antihypertensive treatment), diabetes (fasting serum glucose (GLU) ≥7.0 mmol/l or the use of either insulin or oral hypoglycemic medications), dyslipidemia (fasting serum total cholesterol (TC) ≥5.80 mmol/l, triacylglycerides (TG) ≥1.80 mmol/l, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ≤0.70 mmol/l, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ≥3.30 mmol/l), and cardiopath (arrhythmia and coronary artery disease). IS sorting was performed according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification system [20]. All subjects were Han Chinese, and came from Gansu province in the Northwest of China. There was no kinship among the controls or stroke patients. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before study. The protocol of the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University (lzdxyxy20140310).
Sample size calculation
The prevalence for the ε4 allele in cases and controls was 0.125 and 0.071 respectively [21]. Assuming 90% power and two-sided 5% α, we obtained the minimum sample size 404 in each group. In our study, 515 cases and 515 controls were included, which could meet the minimum sample size requirement.
Blood sample and DNA extraction
After an overnight fast, venous blood was collected from each subject in cases and controls groups and placed into the vacuum tube coated with EDTA2K. By using TIANamp Blood DNA Kit (DP318) (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), DNA was extracted from blood samples of subjects. The concentration and OD ratio was tested by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, U.S.A.) for quality inspection of DNA.
Genotyping
According to the alleles of two single nucleotide polymorphisms of APOE, rs429358, and rs7412, the APOE genotyping was performed by the MassARRAY iPLEX system (Sequenom, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) After an overnight fast, venous blood was collected from each subject in cases and controls groups and placed into the vacuum tube coated with EDTA2K. By using TIANamp Blood DNA Kit (DP318) (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China), DNA was extracted from blood samples of subjects. The concentration and OD ratio were tested by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, U.S.A.) for quality inspection of DNA.(Table 1). In order to control quality, two repetitions and two blank samples were set in each 96-well plate as polymerase chain reaction-negative controls. In genotyping process of APOE, three DNA samples were not detected successfully. Missed detection rate for all 1030 DNA samples was 0.29%. So, we excluded them from the following analysis, including two IS patients and one control participant.
Table 1. Genotyping of APOE.
| APOE | rs429358 | rs7412 |
|---|---|---|
| ε2/ε2 | TT | TT |
| ε2/ε3 | TT | TC |
| ε2/ε4 | TC | TC |
| ε3/ε3 | TT | CC |
| ε3/ε4 | TC | CC |
| ε4/ε4 | CC | CC |
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using the SPSS software version 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York) and the normality test was conducted using Shapiro–Wilk (SW) test before doing the parametric analysis. The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed by chi-square test. General information and risk factors between cases and controls group were compared with Student’s t-test or Pearson’s χ2 test, so as to determine the association between APOE ε4 allele and risk factors of IS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate distribution differences of APOE genotypes and alleles in cases (all IS and subtypes) and controls group after adjusting age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), at the same time the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the strength of association. All P values were two-tailed, and a value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The two single nucleotide polymorphisms of APOE, rs429358 and rs7412, were in HWE in both cases and controls groups (P>0.05). The clinical characteristics of cases and controls groups were showed in Table 2. There were no significant differences on average age, male/female ratio, and average BMI between the cases and controls groups. Blood laboratory tests results showed that IS susceptibility was associated with GLU, TC, TG, HDL, and LDL. Comparing the medical history in two groups of subjects, the proportions of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cardiopath were higher in IS groups (P<0.01). So, the risk factors for IS indicated in the present study are the levels of GLU, TC, TG, HDL, LDL in blood and medical history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cardiopath. According to the TOAST classification, the proportions for the five subtypes were 23.20%, 5.26%, 47.17%, 1.75%, and 22.61% respectively, refer to large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardio-embolic (CE), small vessel disease (SVD), other determined causes, and undetermined IS respectively.
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of patients and controls.
| Characteristics | IS Cases | Controls | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 513 | 514 | – |
| Age | 62.26 ± 12.16 | 61.66 ± 13.49 | 0.452* |
| Gender (M/F) | 294/219 | 288/226 | 0.679† |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.83 ± 2.73 | 24.76 ± 2.83 | 0.677* |
| Glu (mmol/l) | 5.54 ± 3.46 | 4.55 ± 0.92 | <0.001* |
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.32 ± 1.05 | 3.65 ± 0.96 | <0.001* |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.50 ± 0.92 | 1.06 ± 0.59 | <0.001* |
| HDL (mmol/l) | 1.25 ± 0.55 | 1.60 ± 0.38 | <0.001* |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 2.59 ± 0.87 | 1.99 ± 0.61 | <0.001* |
| Hypertension (%) | 211(41.13) | 115(22.37) | <0.001† |
| Diabetes (%) | 139(27.10) | 49(9.53) | <0.001† |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 242(47.17) | 155(30.16) | <0.001† |
| Cardiopathy (%) | 46(8.97) | 10(1.95) | <0.001† |
| TOAST | |||
| Large atery atherosclerosis (%) | 119(23.20) | – | – |
| Cadio-embolic (%) | 27(5.26) | – | – |
| Small vessel disease (%) | 242(47.17) | – | – |
| Other determined causes (%) | 9(1.75) | – | – |
| Undetermined (%) | 116(22.61) | – | – |
*Student’s t-test; †Pearson’s χ2 test. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; F, female; Glu, glucose; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; M, male; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.
In Northwest China, APOE ε3/ε3 genotype and ε3 allele were predominant in both IS patients and controls, as shown in Table 3. Therefore, ε3/ε3 genotype and ε3 allele were account as references in the following analysis. The results of the comparison for genotypes and alleles distribution differences between cases and controls showed that ε4/ε4 genotype and ε4 allele were associated with IS in this population (ε4/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3, P=0.045; ε4 vs. ε3, P=0.012). In consideration of the small number of subjects with ε4/ε4 genotype, those with ε2/ε4, ε3/ε4, and ε4/ε4 genotype were merged into ε4-containing genotype group. Compared with controls, the prevalence of ε4-containing genotypes was significantly higher in cases (P=0.027), as is consistent with above results.
Table 3. Distribution of APOE alleles and genotypes.
| Alleles/Genotypes | Controls (N=514) | All IS (N=513) | P value | OR (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alleles | ||||
| ε2 | 88(8.56) | 76(7.41) | 0.461 | 0.886(0.642–1.222) |
| ε3 | 866(84.24) | 842(82.07) | – | – |
| ε4 | 74(7.20) | 108(10.53) | 0.012 | 1.491(1.093–2.035) |
| Genotypes | ||||
| ε2/ε2 | 5(0.97) | 3(0.58) | 0.560 | 0.651(0.154–2.756) |
| ε2/ε3 | 70(13.62) | 63(12.28) | 0.765 | 0.945(0.652–1.370) |
| ε2/ε4 | 8(1.56) | 7(1.36) | 0.891 | 0.931(0.333–2.600) |
| ε3/ε3 | 366(71.21) | 347(67.64) | – | – |
| ε3/ε4 | 64(12.45) | 85(16.57) | 0.067 | 1.396(0.977–1.995) |
| ε4/ε4 | 1(0.19) | 8(1.56) | 0.045 | 8.449(1.050–67.999) |
| ε4 containing | 73(14.20) | 100(19.49) | 0.027 | 1.453(1.044–2.023) |
During the further analysis, the results indicated the association between APOE gene polymorphisms and five subtypes of IS (Table 4). In LAA subtype, a significant difference was found between cases and controls in the distribution of APOE ε4/ε4 genotypes and ε4 allele. In addition, ε2 allele played a protective role against such type of IS, which was not found in total IS group. In SVD subtype, there was only showed a higher proportion of ε4/ε4 genotype in cases group than controls group but not with ε4 allele. With absence of ε4/ε4 genotype, undermined subtype was correlated with ε4 allele, ε3/ε4 genotype, and ε4-containing genotypes. In other two classes, no association was found between APOE gene polymorphisms and disease susceptibility.
Table 4. Distribution of Apo E alleles and genotypes in IS subtypes.
| Alleles/Genotypes | Controls N (%) | LAA | CE | SVD | OTHER | Undetermined | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | P value OR (95%CI) | N (%) | P value OR (95%CI) | N (%) | P value OR (95%CI) | N (%) | P value OR (95%CI) | N (%) | P value OR (95%CI) | ||
| Alleles | |||||||||||
| ε2 | 88 | 10 | 0.044 | 3 | 0.445 | 40 | 0.945 | 2 | 0.588 | 21 | 0.651 |
| (9.92) | (4.20) | 0.500 (0.254–0.983) | (5.56) | 0.629 (0.192–2.065) | (8.26) | 0.986 (0.666–1.462) | (11.11) | 1.516 (0.336–6.832) | (9.05) | 1.123 (0.679–1.857) | |
| ε3 | 866 | 201 | – | 47 | – | 397 | – | 13 | – | 184 | – |
| (82.78) | (84.45) | 1.000 | (87.04) | 1.000 | (82.02) | 1.000 | (72.22) | 1.000 | (79.31) | 1.000 | |
| ε4 | 74 | 27 | 0.047 | 4 | 0.973 | 47 | 0.109 | 3 | 0.135 | 27 | 0.028 |
| (7.30) | (11.34) | 1.614 (1.007–2.587) | (7.14) | 0.982 (0.344–2.807) | (9.71) | 1.372 (0.932–2.019) | (16.67) | 2.665 (0.738–9.624) | (11.64) | 1.694 (1.059–2.712) | |
| Genotypes | |||||||||||
| ε2/ε2 | 5 | 0 | – | 1 | 0.232 | 2 | 0.841 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| (0.97) | (0.00) | – | (3.70) | 3.894 (0.420–36.147) | (0.83) | 0.844 (0.161–4.425) | (0.00) | – | (0.00) | – | |
| ε2/ε3 | 70 | 10 | 0.176 | 1 | 0.172 | 33 | 0.848 | 2 | 0.258 | 17 | 0.444 |
| (13.62) | (8.40) | 0.613 (0.302–1.245) | (3.70) | 0.244 (0.032–1.848) | (13.64) | 1.045 (0.664–1.647) | (22.22) | 2.702 (0.482–15.143) | (14.66) | 1.259 (0.698–2.270) | |
| ε2/ε4 | 8 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 3 | 0.796 | 0 | – | 4 | 0.166 |
| (1.56) | (0.00) | – | (0.00) | – | (1.24) | 0.838 (0.219–3.204) | (0.00) | – | (3.45) | 2.392 (0.697–8.210) | |
| ε3/ε3 | 366 | 85 | – | 21 | – | 165 | – | 4 | – | 72 | – |
| (71.21) | (71.43) | 1.000 | (77.78) | 1.000 | (68.18) | 1.000 | (44.44) | 1.000 | (62.07) | 1.000 | |
| ε3/ε4 | 64 | 21 | 0.209 | 4 | 0.914 | 34 | 0.521 | 3 | 0.070 | 23 | 0.033 |
| (12.45) | (17.65) | 1.425 (0.820–2.478) | (14.81) | 1.063 (0.352–3.211) | (14.05) | 1.161 (0.735–1.835) | (33.33) | 4.126 (0.892–19.095) | (19.83) | 1.806 (1.049-3.111) | |
| ε4/ε4 | 1 | 3 | 0.017 | 0 | – | 5 | 0.028 | 0 | – | 0 | - |
| (0.19) | (2.52) | 16.525 (1.657–164.773) | (0.00) | – | (2.07) | 11.298 (1.306–97.72) | (0.00) | – | (0.00) | - | |
| ε4 containing | 73 | 24 | 0.169 | 4 | 0.910 | 42 | 0.277 | 3 | 0.095 | 27 | 0.017 |
| (14.20) | (20.17) | 1.445 (0.855–2.441) | (14.81) | 0.939 (0.312–2.823) | (17.36) | 1.265 (0.828–1.932) | (33.33) | 3.678 (0.797–16.987) | (23.28) | 1.868 (1.120-3.115) | |
Abbreviations: CE, cardio-embolic; LAA, large artery atherosclerosis; SVD, small vessel disease.
In order to further illuminate the underlying mechanisms for APOE and IS association, analysis was performed to explore the association between ε4-containing genotypes and clinical characteristics in subjects (Table 5). TC and LDL levels in blood were higher in IS patients with ε4 allele compared with controls. In controls group, besides the TC and LDL levels of blood, it was also showed that TG level in blood was higher in subjects with ε4 allele. After combining cases and controls together, the results showed that the TC and LDL levels in blood were higher in people with ε4 allele. Furthermore, the proportion of subjects with cardiopath history was higher in groups with ε4 allele compared with subjects without ε4 allele. Some clinical information did not relate with APOE gene polymorphisms as shown in the present study, including age, gender, BMI, HDL, and history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia.
Table 5. Association of ε4-containing genotypes with clinical characteristics in IS patients.
| Characteristics | Cases | P value | Controls | P value | All | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With ε4 | Without ε4 | With ε4 | Without ε4 | With ε4 | Without ε4 | ||||
| Number | 100 | 413 | – | 73 | 441 | – | 173 | 854 | – |
| Age | 64.20 ± 12.19 | 61.79 ± 12.13 | 0.452 | 62.23 ± 12.97 | 61.56 ± 13.59 | 0.693 | 63.37 ± 12.53 | 61.67 ± 12.89 | 0.113 |
| Gender (M/F) | 58/42 | 236/177 | 0.876 | 39/34 | 249/192 | 0.628 | 97/76 | 485/369 | 0.861 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.90 ± 2.74 | 24.82 ± 2.73 | 0.789 | 24.91 ± 2.92 | 24.73 ± 2.80 | 0.618 | 24.90 ± 2.81 | 24.77 ± 2.77 | 0.574 |
| Glu (mmol/l) | 5.16 ± 1.70 | 5.63 ± 3.76 | 0.226 | 4.52 ± 0.84 | 4.56 ± 0.94 | 0.741 | 4.89 ± 1.43 | 5.08 ± 2.75 | 0.389 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.59 ± 1.05 | 4.25 ± 1.04 | 0.003 | 3.89 ± 1.04 | 3.60 ± 0.98 | 0.032 | 4.30 ± 1.10 | 3.92 ± 1.06 | 4.47E−5 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.50 ± 0.75 | 1.50 ± 0.96 | 0.996 | 1.21 ± 0.76 | 1.02 ± 0.48 | 0.048 | 1.38 ± 0.77 | 1.26 ± 0.79 | 0.061 |
| HDL (mmol/l) | 1.24 ± 0.45 | 1.25 ± 0.58 | 0.779 | 1.56 ± 0.40 | 1.60 ± 0.37 | 0.355 | 1.37 ± 0.46 | 1.43 ± 0.51 | 0.143 |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 2.81 ± 0.83 | 2.54 ± 0.88 | 0.005 | 2.16 ± 0.85 | 1.94 ± 0.61 | 0.036 | 2.54 ± 0.90 | 2.23 ± 0.81 | 4.51E−5 |
| Hypertension (%) | 44 (44.00) | 167 (40.44) | 0.516 | 18 (24.66) | 97 (22.00) | 0.163 | 62 (35.83) | 264 (30.91) | 0.204 |
| Diabetes (%) | 21 (21.00) | 118 (28.57) | 0.126 | 9 (12.33) | 40 (9.07) | 0.380 | 30 (17.34) | 158 (18.50) | 0.719 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 52 (52.00) | 190 (46.00) | 0.281 | 17 (23.29) | 138 (31.29) | 0.167 | 69 (39.88) | 328 (38.41) | 0.716 |
| Cardiopathy (%) | 14 (14.00) | 32 (7.75) | 0.050 | 2 (2.74) | 8 (1.81) | 0.596 | 16 (9.25) | 40 (4.68) | 0.016 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; F, female; Glu, glucose; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; M, male; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.
In order to determine whether the clinical variables and ε4-containing genotypes were independent risk factors for IS, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using three models. The results were shown in Table 6. ε3/ε3 genotype and ε3 allele were account as references in the following analysis. The three models included different independent variables. The six genotypes were included in Model 1, Glu, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, hypertension, and cardiopathy were statistically significant (all P<0.05) while the six genotypes were all non-significant (all P>0.05). In Model 2, we combined all the genotypes with ε4, including ε2/ε4, ε3/ε4, and ε4/ε4, the similar results to Model 1 were obtained. APOE allele was included in Model 3, including ε2, ε3, and ε4. Diabetes and dyslipidemia were also statistically significant like the other biochemical parameters mentioned in the previous two models (all P<0.05), and the three alleles showed no statistical difference (all P>0.05). The results suggested that the APOE gene was an influence factor for IS, but was not an independent influence factor (Table 6).
Table 6. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for risk factors of ischemic stroke.
| Characteristics | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | |
| Age | 0.070 | 1.011 (0.999–1.023) | 0.064 | 1.011 (0.999–1.023) | 0.009 | 1.011 (1.003–1.020) |
| Gender | 0.990 | 0.998 (0.733–1.359) | 1.000 | 0.998 (0.735–1.362) | 0.982 | 0.998 (0.802–1.241) |
| BMI | 0.768 | 0.992 (0.940–1.047) | 0.817 | 0.994 (0.942–1.049) | 0.896 | 0.997 (0.960–1.036) |
| Glu | <0.001 | 1.530 (1.288–1.817) | <0.001 | 1.525 (1.285–1.811) | <0.001 | 1.527 (1.353–1.724) |
| TC | 0.012 | 1.334 (1.066–1.669) | 0.011 | 1.339 (1.071–1.675) | <0.001 | 1.344 (1.149–1.573) |
| TG | 0.022 | 1.352 (1.045–1.750) | 0.024 | 1.343 (1.040–1.736) | 0.001 | 1.344 (1.122–1.611) |
| HDL | <0.001 | 0.198 (0.133–0.295) | <0.001 | 0.197 (0.132–0.293) | <0.001 | 0.198 (0.149–0.262) |
| LDL | <0.001 | 1.990 (1.496–2.648) | <0.001 | 1.995 (1.500–2.654) | <0.001 | 1.969 (1.613–2.404) |
| Hypertension | 0.009 | 1.574 (1.123–2.208) | 0.009 | 1.569 (1.120–2.199) | <0.001 | 1.602 (1.264–2.030) |
| Diabetes | 0.053 | 1.609 (0.993–2.607) | 0.051 | 1.615 (0.997–2.615) | 0.007 | 1.602 (1.141–2.250) |
| Dyslipidemia | 0.129 | 0.760 (0.533–1.083) | 0.128 | 0.760 (0.533–1.082) | 0.028 | 0.756 (0.589–0.971) |
| Cardiopathy | 0.023 | 2.489 (1.131–5.476) | 0.022 | 2.515 (1.144–5.526) | 0.001 | 2.488 (1.429–4.332) |
| APOE genotype | ||||||
| ε3/ε3 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
| ε2/ε2 | 0.971 | 0.965 (0.139–6.697) | 0.976 | 0.971 (0.140–6.760) | ||
| ε2/ε3 | 0.400 | 1.215 (0.772–1.910) | 0.396 | 1.217 (0.774–1.913) | ||
| ε2/ε4 | 0.429 | 0.626 (0.197–1.995) | ||||
| ε3/ε4 | 0.739 | 1.078 (0.693–1.677) | ||||
| ε4/ε4 | 0.518 | 2.096 (0.222–19.783) | ||||
| ε4-containing | 0.856 | 1.039 (0.685–1.576) | ||||
| APOE allele | ||||||
| ε3 | 1.000 | |||||
| ε2 | 0.678 | 1.086 (0.736–1.602) | ||||
| ε4 | 0.844 | 1.039 (0.709–1.523) | ||||
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; F, female; Glu, glucose; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; M, male; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.
Model 1 includes six different APOE genotype; Model 2 includes ε4-containing gene; Model 3 includes three different APOE alleles.
Discussion
To date, studies of the association between IS and APOE gene polymorphisms have been performed in some cohorts and yielded somewhat inconsistent results. In the present study, we found that APOE gene polymorphisms were associated with IS susceptibility in a Northwest China Han people. It is consistent with a large meta-analysis, which showed that such relation was more distinct in Asia population [10]. However, in a large sample study conducted by ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities), involves 15792 men and women, aged 45–64 years, the results showed that APOE was not a risk factor for incident of IS [15], which is opposite to our conclusion. The differences of age, sample size, and ethnicities in studies may also account for the disagreement. The mean age of our study is 10 years older than that in ARIC study.
In LAA and SVD subtypes, genetic factors seem to be more important than other IS subtypes [22,23]. It was also confirmed in our study on the APOE and IS association. A research showed a clear association of APOE with carotid intima-media thickness [24]. It is possible that APOE influence LAA, for which carotid intima-media thickness is an informative intermediate phenotype. Apart from the relationship between APOE ε4 allele and IS, in LAA, APOE ε2 allele played a protector role against IS. A study found such weak protective effects in black women [16]. Besides, the apparent relation between APOE and undetermined subtype was found in the present study. Considering the lack of precise examination for cerebrovascular disease and two or more subtypes mix, the classification was not accurate enough. From this perspective, the association between APOE and undetermined subtype might be a false appearance for such association with other subtypes. On the other hand, the further studies still need to perform to explore the mechanisms underlying this association.
Traditional risk factors for IS were affected by APOE gene polymorphism indicated in the present study, including TC, TG, and LDL in blood. It was found that TC, TG, and LDL levels of serum were higher in the patients with ε4 allele, which coincides with previous studies [25–27]. The nexus of blood lipid level and APOE genotypes was found in all subjects. And compared with controls, the levels of blood TC, TG, and LDL were higher in cases group. It can be derived that APOE gene polymorphism takes effect on IS incidence through the influence on plasma lipid. In the present study, the correlation of cardiopath and APOE variants was found in all subjects. The cardiopath history mentioned in the present study included coronary heart disease and arrhythmia. It is confirmed in some meta-analysis that carriers of ε4 allele have increased risk for coronary heart disease in Chinese [28,29]. And it was showed that the APOE variants result in a 2-fold or greater increased risk for coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and ventricular fibrillation [30]. Researches showed that APOE ε4 allele was associated with BMI, hypertension, and diabetes [31–33]. But the present study did not show such nexuses. A study in a cognitively normal aging Han Chinese population showed that there was no correlation between APOE genotypes and serum levels of GLU [25], which is consistent with the present study. All in all, the results of analysis for association between APOE ε4 allele and some traditional risk factors of IS showed that plasma lipid level was affected by APOE variants. Given that high levels of blood TC, TG, and LDL were related to IS incidence, the relations of APOE ε4 allele to IS might be attributable, at least in part, to the effect on lipid level. However, other mechanisms underlying APOE and IS association are still undetermined.
The present study has several strengths and weaknesses. One hand, with a relatively large sample subjects who were homogeneous ethnicity and geographic region, complete and accurate information collection, and a high throughput platform for APOE genotyping, our study is creditable and valid. On the other hand, selection bias cannot be protected against thoroughly in such a case–control study. Also, in the present study, the age and gender were not exactly matched in the two groups, which may reduce the effectiveness of study and introduce selection bias, but the age and gender were equally comparable in the two groups (P>0.05). Therefore, further researches are needed to verify the association between APOE and IS in Northwest China. Moreover, the underlying mechanisms are also need to study in depth.
In summary, it appears that APOE gene is a risk factor for IS in a Northwest China Han population included in the present study, especially for some subtypes, LAA, SVD, and undetermined subgroups. Blood lipid level is higher in subjects with ε4 allele. For some limits in our study, replication of study on APOE and IS association will conducive to further elucidate the role of APOE in IS incidence.
Abbreviations
- APOE
Apolipoprotein E
- BMI
body mass index
- CE
cardio-embolic
- GLU
glucose
- HDAC9
histone deacetylase 9
- HWE
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
- IS
Ischemic stroke
- LAA
large artery atherosclerosis
- LDL
low-density lipoprotein
- MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
- MTHFR
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase
- SVD
small vessel disease
- TC
total cholesterol
- TG
triacylglycerides
- TOAST
Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Author Contribution
L.-l.Z, G.S. and L.-x.C. conceived and designed the experiments; L.W. and Q.Y. performed the experiments; X.-p.W. analyzed the data; W.Y. and Z.-c.Z. wrote the paper.
Funding
This study was supported by The Gansu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (1506RJZA242, Study on interaction of multiple locus of susceptible gene in ischemic stroke); The Gansu Province 2015 “Longyuan Youth Talent Support Project Plan” (2109901, Ischemic stroke early molecular mark screening and clinical translational research); The Health Industry Planning Project of Gansu Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission (GSWSKY 2016-17); and The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2016-63).
References
- 1.Go A.S., Mozaffarian D., Roger V.L., Benjamin E.J., Berry J.D., Blaha M.J. et al. (2014) Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 129, e28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen Z. (2008) The mortality and death cause of national sample areas. The Third National Survey on the Cause of Death 1, 14–15 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang Y., Cui L., Ji X., Dong Q., Zeng J., Wang Y. et al. (2011) The China National Stroke Registry for patients with acute cerebrovascular events: design, rationale, and baseline patient characteristics. Int. J. Stroke 6, 355–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gschwendtner A. and Dichgans M. (2013) Genetics of ischemic stroke. Der Nervenarzt 84, 166–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ikram M.A., Seshadri S., Bis J.C., Fornage M., Destefano A.L., Aulchenko Y.S. et al. (2009) Genomewide association studies of stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chou S.H., Shulman J.M., Keenan B.T., Secor E.A., Buchman A.S., Schneider J. et al. (2013) Genetic susceptibility for ischemic infarction and arteriolosclerosis based on neuropathologic evaluations. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 36, 181–188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sultana S., Kolla V.K., Jeedigunta Y., Penagaluru P.K., Joshi S., Rani P et al. (2011) Tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 10 gene polymorphisms and the risk of ischemic stroke in south Indian population. J. Genet. 90, 361–364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murali V., Rathika C., Ramgopal S., Padma Malini R., Arun Kumar M.J, Neethi Arasu V. et al. (2016) Susceptible and protective associations of HLA DRB1*/DQB1* alleles and haplotypes with ischaemic stroke. Int. J. Immunogenet. 43, 159–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weisgraber K.H., Rall S.C. Jr and Mahley R.W. (1982) Abnormal lipoprotein receptor-binding activity of the human E apoprotein due to cysteine-arginine interchange at a single site. J. Biol. Chem. 256, 9077–9083 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Corder E.H., Saunders A.M., Strittmatter W.J., Schmechel D.E., Gaskell P.C., Small G.W. et al. (1993) Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 261, 921–923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sudlow C., Kim J. and Clark C. (2006) Does apolipoprotein E genotype influence the risk of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage? Stroke 37, 364–370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shin M.H., Choi J.S., Rhee J.A., Lee Y.H., Nam H.S., Jeong S.K. et al. (2014) APOE, polymorphism and carotid atherosclerosis in Korean population: the Dong-gu study and the namwon study. Atherosclerosis 232, 180–185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Keage H.A., Matthews F.E., Yip A., Gao L., Mccracken C., Mckeith I.G. et al. (2010) APOE and ACE polymorphisms and dementia risk in the older population over prolonged follow-up: 10 years of incidence in the MRC CFA study. Age Ageing 39, 104–111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blanch É.H., Cabanne L., Sahbatou M. and Thomas G. (2001) A study of french centenarians: are ACE and APOE associated with longevity? CR Acad Sci III 324, 129–135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rea I.M., Mc D.I., Mcmaster D., Smye M., Stout R. and Evans A. (2001) Apolipoprotein E alleles in nonagenarian subjects in the Belfast elderly longitudinal free-living ageing study (Belfast). Mech. Ageing Dev. 122, 1367–1372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sturgeon J.D., Folsom A.R., Bray M.S., Boerwinkle E. and Ballantyne C.M. (2005) Apolipoprotein E genotype and incident ischemic stroke: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Stroke 36, 2484–2486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lian G.U., Li S.U., Chen Q., Liang B., Qin Y., Xie J. et al. (2013) Association between the apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and ischemic stroke in Chinese populations: new data and meta-analysis. Exp. Ther. Med. 5, 853–859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lai C.L., Liu C.K., Lin R.T. and Tai C.T. (2007) Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with ischemic stroke subtypes in Taiwan. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 23, 491–497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Han Y., Sun W., Wang L., Tao S., Tian L., Hao Y. et al. (2013) HDAC9 gene is associated with stroke risk in a Chinese population. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 238, 842–847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chung J.W., Park S.H., Kim N., Kim W.J., Park J.H., Ko Y. et al. (2014) Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification and vascular territory of ischemic stroke lesions diagnosed by diffusion-weighted imaging. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 3, e001119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pezzini A., Grassi M., Zotto E.D., Bazzoli E., Archetti S. and Assanelli D. (2004) Synergistic effect of apolipoprotein e polymorphisms and cigarette smoking on risk of ischemic stroke in young adults. Stroke 35, 438–442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schulz U.G., Flossmann E. and Rothwell P.M. (2004) Heritability of ischemic stroke in relation to age, vascular risk factors, and subtypes of incident stroke in population-based studies. Stroke 35, 819–824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jerrarddunne P., Cloud G., Hassan A. and Markus H. S. (2003) Evaluating the genetic component of ischemic stroke subtypes: a family history study. Stroke 34, 1364–1369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Paternoster L., Martínez González N. A., Lewis S. and Sudlow C. (2008) Association between apolipoprotein E genotype and carotid intima-media thickness may suggest a specific effect on large artery atherothrombotic stroke. Stroke 39, 48–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tao Q.Q., Chen Y., Liu Z.J., Sun Y.M., Yang P., Lu S.J. et al. (2014) Associations between apolipoprotein E genotypes and serum levels of glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides in a cognitively normal aging Han Chinese population. Clin. Interv. Aging 9, 1063–1067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Raygani A.V., Rahimi Z., Kharazi H., Tavilani H. and Pourmotabbed T. (2006) Association between apolipoprotein E polymorphism and serum lipid and apolipoprotein levels with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 408, 68–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu H.C., Hong C.J., Wang S.J., Fuh J.L., Wang P.N., Shyu H.Y. et al. (1999) ApoE genotype in relation to AD and cholesterol: a study of 2,326 Chinese adults. Neurology 53, 962–966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang M., Gu W., Qiao S., Zhu E., Zhao Q. and Lv S. (2014) Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and risk for coronary heart disease in the Chinese population: a meta-analysis of 61 studies including 6634 cases and 6393 controls. PLoS One 64, C110–C111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yin Y.W., Sun Q.Q., Zhang B.B., Hu A.M., Liu H.L., Wang Q. et al. (2013) Association between apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and the risk of coronary artery disease in Chinese population: evidence from a meta-analysis of 40 studies. PLoS One 8, e66924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Végh C., Langmár Z., Szerző M., Agota A., Marosi K., Szabolcs Z. et al. (2012) Connections between apolipoprotein E genotypes and the development of cardiovascular diseases. Orv. Hetil. 153, 2070–2076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Koopal C., Van d. G.Y., Asselbergs F.W., Westerink J., Vissere F.L. and Group S.S. (2014) Influence of APOE-2 genotype on the relation between adiposity and plasma lipid levels in patients with vascular disease. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 39, 265–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stoumpos S., Hamodrakas S.J., Anthopoulos P.G. and Bagos P.G. (2013) The association between apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms and essential hypertension: a meta-analysis of 45 studies including 13940 cases and 16364 controls. J. Hum. Hypertens. 27, 245–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yin Y.W., Qiao L., Sun Q.Q., Hu A.M., Liu H.L., Wang Q. et al. (2014) Influence of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism on development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese Han population: a meta-analysis of 29 studies. Metabolism 63, 532–541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]