Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2017 Oct 6;8(55):94142–94150. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21589

Naringin improves random skin flap survival in rats

Liang Cheng 1, Tingxiang Chen 1, Qiming Tu 1, Hang Li 1, Zhenghua Feng 1, Zhijie Li 1, Dingsheng Lin 1
PMCID: PMC5706862  PMID: 29212216

Abstract

Background

Random-pattern flap transfer is commonly used to treat soft-tissue defects. However, flap necrosis remains a serious problem. Naringin accelerates angiogenesis by activating the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In the present study, we investigated whether naringin improves the survival of random skin flaps.

Results

Compared with controls, the naringin-treated groups exhibited significantly larger mean areas of flap survival, significantly increased SOD activity and VEGF expression, and significantly reduced MDA level. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining revealed that naringin promoted angiogenesis and inhibited inflammation.

Materials and Methods

“McFarlane flap” models were established in 90 male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats divided into three groups: a 40 mg/kg control group (0.5 % sodium carboxymethylcellulose), a 40 mg/kg naringin-treated group, and an 80 mg/kg naringin-treated group. The extent of necrosis was measured 7 days later, and tissue samples were subjected to histological analysis. Angiogenesis was evaluated via lead oxide–gelatin angiography, immunohistochemistry, and laser Doppler imaging. Inflammation was evaluated by measurement of serum TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α) and IL-6 (interleukin-6) levels. Oxidative stress was assessed by measuring superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and the malondialdehyde (MDA) level.

Conclusion

Naringin improved random skin flap survival.

Keywords: naringin, random flap survival, angiogenesis, inflammation, rat

INTRODUCTION

Flaps are commonly used to remedy cosmetic defects, restore function after traffic accidents and other traumas, and in the aged. Aydin and Liang W used pedicled, nasolabial island flaps to rebuild the nose after removal of nose-tip basal cell carcinomas [1, 2]. Free flap reconstruction has also been employed to treat breast cancer patients [3]. Morris used a perforator flap to repair a large defect on the back [4]. Random skin flaps that are similar to the wound in texture, color, and dermatoglyphic properties are often employed to repair small soft-tissue defects evident after tumor resection. An adequate blood supply is essential for flap survival; the possibility of necrosis (especially complete necrosis) must be considered when designing and placing flaps [5]. Many agents have been reported to improve flap survival by inhibiting inflammation, increasing free-radical scavenging, promoting angiogenesis, and/or expanding the microvascular network. Such materials include VEGF [6], sildenafil [7], bezafibrate [8], aspirin [9], and some traditional Chinese medicines [10, 11].

Naringin (4’, 5, 7-trihydroxy flavanone-7-rhamnoglucoside) is a flavanone glycoside of grapefruit and other citrus fruits that exhibits many pharmacological activities [12, 13]. Naringin inhibits both oxidative stress [14] and the inflammatory response [15] and reduces apoptosis [16]. Naringin is both neuroprotective [17] and hepatoprotective [18], and it promoted fracture healing in osteoporotic rats [19]. The etiopathogeneses of lung injuries and pulmonary fibrosis feature expression of TNF-α and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) [20]. Naringin may stimulate angiogenesis by activating VEGF expression [12, 19, 21]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has explored whether naringin improves the survival of random skin flaps. We explore this possibility in the present study.

RESULTS

General observations and survival of flaps

Every flap was monitored by the same experimenter from day 1 to 7 postoperatively and the conditions (flap color, elasticity and necrosis) were recorded. On postoperative day 7, all groups showed well-demarcated borders between the surviving and necrotic parts; the necrotic areas presented dark, hard, and did not bleed when cut, while the surviving areas presented rosy, soft, and bled when cut (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Digital photographs of flaps from the three groups and the necrosis parts were outlined by red line.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The flap survival portions were 73.89±4.01% in the Naringin-L group, 77.57±3.96% in the Naringin-H group and 50.2±2.23% in the controls (Figure 2). In the naringin group, flap survival area was significantly larger than the controls (**p < 0.01 vs. the control group).

Figure 2. Percentage of survival area on day 7 in three groups (**p < 0.01 vs. the control group).

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Histological changes

In order to evaluate the effects of naringin on the thickness of granulation tissue, tissue edema and infiltration of neutrophil cells, flap sections were prepared for HE staining. As demonstrated in Figure 3A, on day 7, the distal areas were morphologically similar in histological terms. All flaps exhibited similar changes in appearance; inflammatory cells infiltration was prominent, as were structural damage and edema. Ninety percent of tissue images revealed degeneration and necrosis of muscle fibers. Area II of the control group showed that many inflammatory cells were detected, while less in the treatment group, especially in the high-dose group, indicating that the inflammatory reaction was less severe in the treated flaps. Besides, the microvascular density (MVD) of area II was 33.38±2.90, 30.44±1.23, 14.04±2.66/mm2 in the Naringin-H groups, Naringin-L groups and control groups, respectively (Figure 3B; **p < 0.01 vs. the control group). In area I, the Naringin group exhibited edema, vascular dilation and inflammatory cells infiltration to a lesser extent than controls.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Histological changes in the each area of the flaps in the three groups (100 and 200 magnification). (B) The MVDs of area II in the three groups (**p < 0.01 vs. the control group). Yellow arrow indicated the microvascular and white arrow indicated the neutrophil cells.

Tissue edema

Percent tissue water content was significantly lower in the test group (low dose group: 52.66±3.48%; high dose group: 48.97±2.43%) compared with that in the control group (56.05± 2.13%) (p < 0.01).

Flap angiography

Through X-ray imaging obtained 7 days postoperatively, the microvascular of flaps were shown clearly. In the treatment group, particularly in the high-dose group the microvascular of flaps was greater than that in controls (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Flap angiography presenting flaps from the three groups.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

VEGF expression

The VEGF expression level in the naringin group was significantly higher than in the controls based on the IA value 4535±230 (Naringin-H), 4167±271 (Naringin-L), 2061±187 (Controls), respectively (Figure 5, **p < 0.01vs. the control group).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A) Comparison of VEGF expression in the intermediate area II of the three groups. The immunohistochemistry test and observed under magnification 200. (B) IA value was detected to compare the level of VEGF (**p < 0.01 vs. the control group). IA, integral absorbance; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Laser doppler imaging

On day 7, the Laser Doppler System was used to evaluate the blood flow of the flap. The blood flow of the middle area was 70.80±11.69 (Control group), 148.37±36.76 (Naringin-L), 159.98±42.67 (Naringin-H), respectively, and the blood flow in the treatment group was significantly larger than in the controls (Figure 6, **p < 0.01vs. the control group).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(A) The blood perfusion on day 7 in three groups. (B) Mean blood flow of the second choke zone in the flap in three groups measured by laser Doppler imaging at day 7 after surgery (**p < 0.01 vs. the control group).

Proinflammatory cytokines in serum

The ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) kits were used to explore the levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α in serum, expressing the degree of inflammatory response. Naringin dramatically decreased the levels of IL-6 (46.16±4.39 pg/mL, low-dose group), (38.32±5.90 pg/mL, high-dose group) compared with the control group (72.67±5.04 pg/mL) (Figure 7A, **p < 0.01 vs. the control group), meanwhile the level of TNF-α after Naringin administration (96.85±6.39pg/mL, low-dose group), (89.44±4.83 pg/mL, high-dose group) was also reduced relative to the control group (142.16±8.75 pg/mL) (Figure 7B, **p < 0.01 vs. the control group). Summarily, these datas indicated Naringin had the ability of decreasing the release of cytokines in the flap.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(A, B) The expression of the flap inflammation reaction factor (TNF-a, IL-6) (**p < 0.01 vs. the control group). (C, D) The expression of the flap oxidative stress factor (SOD, MDA) (**p < 0.01 vs. the control group).

Superoxide dismutase activity and malondialdehyde content

The mean SOD activity level in the naringin group was 65.23±4.76 (Naingin-L), 66.32 ±2.87 (Naringin-H)U/mg protein, which was significantly higher than in the controls (28.80±2.33U/mg protein) (Figure 7C, **p < 0.01 vs. the control group). The mean MDA level in the naringin-L group (20.08±1.51 nmol/mg protein) and in the high group (18.71±1.71 nmol/mg protein) was significantly lower than that in the controls (58.24±1.64 nmol/mg protein) (Figure 7D, **p < 0.01 vs. the control group).

DISCUSSION

Acceptable functional restoration and good cosmetic results are among the desired endpoints of tumor resection. Flap placement may afford satisfactory esthetic and functional outcomes and is increasing in popularity. However, distal flap necrosis attributable to ischemia is a major problem, increasing treatment costs and in-hospital time. Ischemia, ischemia–reperfusion injury, and inflammation may all be in play [22–25]. We found that naringin protected against flap necrosis by inhibiting apoptosis, attenuating the inflammatory response and oxidative stress, and stimulating blood vessel growth.

VEGF, a multifunctional growth factor, plays a central role in angiogenesis, promoting neovascularization and endothelial cell proliferation, which in turn improve flap survival [26, 27]. Angiogenesis greatly enhances vasculogenesis by increasing the delivery levels of oxygen, nutrients, and collagen building blocks [28]. Earlier, naringin was found to trigger VEGF synthesis, to enhance angiogenesis, and to improve capillary density in rats with diabetic foot ulcers. The angiogenetic effect was especially marked [12, 29]. We found that, compared with control rats, the IA (integral absorbance) value was markedly increased in the naringin groups, as were the mean vessel density in area II and the vessel numbers revealed by flap angiography and laser Doppler imaging. However, although VEGF expression was greater in the high-dose than in the low-dose naringin group, the improvements in flap survival were similar between the two groups. Naringin indeed promoted angiogenesis, increasing vessel numbers in damaged tissue by enhancing blood supply and VEGF expression. However, angiogenesis mediated by VEGF is a double-edged sword, promoting flap survival on the one hand and facilitating tumor metastasis on the other. Therefore, the use of VEGF-enhancing drugs requires further investigation.

The pro-inflammatory growth factor TNF-α facilitates release of the inflammatory mediators interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-8, aggravating tissue damage and triggering apoptosis. Recently, VEGF was shown to significantly reduce TNF-α expression and inflammation, both in flaps and other ischemic tissues [26, 30]. Inflammation greatly compromises flap survival [31]. The level of MDA (a major marker of lipid peroxidation) directly reflects the extent of tissue injury [32]. SOD, a crucial endogenous anti-oxidase, protects cells from injury caused by toxic oxygen-derived free radicals, and the SOD level is a sensitive indicator of antioxidant status [33]. We found that the oxidative stress level and serum levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly reduced in the naringin groups compared with the control, suggesting that naringin alleviated inflammation and oxidative stress, thus effectively preventing ischemia–reperfusion injury. The detailed mechanism involved requires further study.

Thus, naringin improved flap survival by inhibiting inflammation and oxidative stress and promoting angiogenesis. In clinical practice, naringin may enhance flap survival. Additional clinical and experimental studies are required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal

We obtained 90 male SD rats (weight, 250–300g) from Wenzhou Medical University (SYXK [Zhe] 2015–0009). All experimental procedures were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Wenzhou Medical University.

Reagents

Naringin was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Anti-VEGF (anti–vascular endothelial growth factor) polyclonal antibody (pAb) was obtained from Bioworld (Nanjing, China). SOD and MDA test kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Biology Institution (Nanjing, China). Rat TNF- α and IL-6 ELISA kits were purchased from Nanjing KeyGEN Biotech (Nanjing, China).

Flap animal model and drug administration

The modified McFarlane flap model (3 × 9cm) was applied to every rat [34]. The area of the dorsum was divided into three equal segments: I, II and III (proximal, intermediate and distal) (Figure 8). Following the surgical procedure, all 90 rats were randomly divided into three groups: a 40 mg/kg naringin-treated group (n = 30, low-dose group); an 80 mg/kg naringin-treated group (n = 30, high-dose group) and a 40 mg/kg control group (0.5 % sodium carboxymethylcellulose) (n = 30). For oral administration, naringin was suspended in 0.5 % sodium carboxymethylcellulose. All rats were treated for 7 days. Postoperatively, all rats were housed in an environmentally controlled room, in standard experimental cages individually and fed standard rat chow and water ad libitum. Because of the self-mutilation, all rats were tied with a collar [35].

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(A) A McFarlane flap model was designed (3×9 cm) and three parts were divided (I, II, and III); (B) no axial vessels were incorporated into the flap; (C) the rats had a self-mutilation tendency and they would bite the flaps on their back and cause flap injuries; (D) the rats were fitted with a neck collar to prevent self-mutilation.

Flap survival measurement

The surviving area of each flap was observed macroscopically during the injection and the appearance, tissue elasticity and hair condition were assessed. After 7 days, we measured the surviving area and total area of each flap using transparent cellophane and the weights of the flap using an electronic scale; the surviving area was calculated as a percentage [8]. The following formula was used to quantify the results: extent of the viable area × 100/the total area (viable and ischemic) [24].

Histological staining

After all rats were sacrificed, three samples (size in 1×1cm) of the centre flap tissue were harvested from each area, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and routine procedures were performed. Paraffin blocks were cut into 4 μm slices, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The Olympus BH51 light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; ×100 magnification) was used to evaluate the condition of tissue edema, the thickness of granulation tissue and count the number of neutrophil cells. Furthermore, in order to comprehend the condition of microvascular density, we also calculated the microvessel number in each unit area(/mm2).

Tissue edema measurements

After executing the rats, we weighed flap tissue using an electronic scale, and dehydrated using an autoclave with the temperature of 50°C. In order to obtain a constant weight, all samples were weighed daily and until the weight did not change for 2 days. Water content reflected the degree of edema. The percent water content was determined by the following equation: Tissue% water content = ([wet weight-dry weight]/ wet weight)×100%.

Flap angiography

Using a 24-gauge intravenous catheter based on a modified lead oxide-gelatin inoculability tip, ten rats choosing from every group sustained whole-body angiography at 7 days after the operation [36]. Heparin saline (1%, 1.5 mL) was injected to the right carotid artery and then the contrast medium (150 mL/kg) consisted of water, lead oxide and gelatin, was followed. After fixation overnight, we radiographed the flap using an X-ray machine (54 kVp, 40 mA, 100-second exposure).

Laser doppler imaging

All animals were performed using a laser Doppler imaging system (Lisca PIMII, Stockholm, Sweden) on the day of sacrifice. The blood perfusion monitor (PeriFlux System 5000; PERIMED, Järfälla, Sweden) began one hour after stabilization. The second choke zone was inspected for 1 minute. The mean blood flow was expressed as perfusion units [37].

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunohistochemical staining was conducted for VEGF using the streptavidin-peroxidase method [38]. Flap tissues were imaged at ×400 magnification using a DP2-TWAN image-acquisition system (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Images were saved using Image-Pro Plus software, version 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD) and the VEGF expression levels was detected by the IA values.

SOD activity and mda content

Ten tissue samples (5 × 5 mm) were gained from Areas II at 7 days after the operation, and then a series of procedures were carried out including weighing, homogenizing and diluting. SOD activity was measured by the oxidase enzymatic method, and MDA level was gauged through an approach triggered by a reaction with thiobarbituric acid at 90 to 100°C [39].

Determination of cytokines in serum by ELISA

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the ELISA kits were applied to measure the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS software (ver.20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to statistical analyses and all values were marked as mean ± SD. Multiple comparisons between groups were using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. P values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Abbreviations

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

SOD

measuring superoxide dismutase

MDA

malondialdehyde

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor-α

TGF-β

transforming growth factor-β

MVD

microvascular density

HE

hematoxylin and eosin

IA

integral absorbance

IL-1

interleukin-1

IL-6

interleukin-6

IL-8

interleukin -8

ELISA

enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

ANOVA

analysis of variance

Author contributions

Liang Cheng, Zhijie Li and Dingsheng Lin participated in the design of the study, Liang Cheng, Tingxiang Chen, Qiming Tu and Hang Li performed data analysis. Liang Cheng, Zhijie Li, and Dingsheng Li helped to revise the manuscript. Liang Cheng, Tingxiang Chen and Zhenghua Feng carried out Data collection, Lianng Cheng, Tingxiang Chen, Qiming Tu and Dingsheng Lin helped to draft the manuscript. Liang Cheng and Zhijie Li performed statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the fnal manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province Project (No. 2017C33024) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. Y16H060039).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Turan A, Kul Z, Turkaslan T, Ozyigit T, Ozsoy Z. Reconstruction of lower half defects of the nose with the lateral nasal artery pedicle nasolabial island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1767–1772. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000259088.47033.aa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ji C1, Li R, Shen G, Zhang J, Liang W. Multiple pedicled flaps cover for large defects following resection of malignant tumors with partition concept. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7455. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim J, Lee J, Chang E, Suh K. Immediate extended latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer associated with paraffinoma: report of a case. Surg Today. 2011;41:1680–1683. doi: 10.1007/s00595-011-4510-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prasad V, Morris SF. Propeller DICAP flap for a large defect on the back-case report and review of the literature. Microsurgery. 2012;32:617–621. doi: 10.1002/micr.22039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim YS, Roh TS, Lee WJ, Yoo WM, Tark KC. The effect of botulinum toxin A on skin flap survival in rats. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:411–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kryger Z, Zhang F, Dogan T, Cheng C, Lineaweaver WC, Buncke HJ. The effects of VEGF on survival of a random flap in the rat: examination of various routes of administration. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:234–239. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sarifakioglu N, Gokrem S, Ates L, Akbuga UB, Aslan G. The influence of sildenafil on random skin flap survival in rats: an experimental study. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:769–772. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lin B, Lin Y, Lin D, Cao B. Effects of bezafibrate on the survival of random skin flaps in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016;32:395. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shalom A, Friedman T, Westreich M. Effect of aspirin and heparin on random skin flap survival in rats. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:785–790. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kailiang Z, Yihui Z, Dingsheng L, Xianyao T. Effects of muscone on random skin flap survival in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015;32:200. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1565264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cai L, Cao B, Lin D. Effects of traditional Chinese medicine Huangqi injection (Radix astragali) on random skin flap survival in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015;31:565. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1555142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kandhare AD, Ghosh P, Bodhankar SL. Naringin, a flavanone glycoside, promotes angiogenesis and inhibits endothelial apoptosis through modulation of inflammatory and growth factor expression in diabetic foot ulcer in rats. Chem Biol Interact. 2014;219:101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2014.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pang WY, Wang XL, Mok SK, Lai WP, Chow HK, Leung PC, Yao XS, Wong MS. Naringin improves bone properties in ovariectomized mice and exerts oestrogen-like activities in rat osteoblast-like (UMR-106) cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;159:1693–1703. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00664.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caviasaiz M, Busto MD, Pilarizquierdo MC, Ortega N, Perezmateos M, Muñiz P. Antioxidant properties, radical scavenging activity and biomolecule protection capacity of flavonoid naringenin and its glycoside naringin: a comparative study. J Sci Food Agric. 2010;90:1238–1244. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Anuja GI, Latha PG, Suja SR, Shyamal S, Shine VJ, Sini S, Pradeep S, Shikha P, Rajasekharan S. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of Drynaria quercifolia (L.) J. Smith. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;132:456. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chanet A, Milenkovic D, Manach C, Mazur A, Morand C. Citrus flavanones: what is their role in cardiovascular protection? J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:8809–8822. doi: 10.1021/jf300669s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gopinath K, Prakash D, Sudhandiran G. Neuroprotective effect of naringin, a dietary flavonoid against 3-nitropropionic acid-induced neuronal apoptosis. Neurochem Int. 2011;59:1066. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cavanagh PR, Lipsky BA, Bradbury AW, Botek G. Treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet. 2005;366:1725–1735. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67699-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Song N, Zhao Z, Ma X, Sun X, Ma J, Li F, Sun L, Lv J. Naringin promotes fracture healing through stimulation of angiogenesis by regulating the VEGF/VEGFR-2 signaling pathway in osteoporotic rats. Chem Biol Interact. 2016;261:11. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen Y, Nie YC, Luo YL, Lin F, Zheng YF, Cheng GH, Wu H, Zhang KJ, Su WW, Shen JG, Li PB. Protective effects of naringin against paraquat-induced acute lung injury and pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;58:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eshkar-Oren I, Viukov SV, Salameh S, Krief S, Oh CD, Akiyama H, Gerber HP, Ferrara N, Zelzer E. The forming limb skeleton serves as a signaling center for limb vasculature patterning via regulation of Vegf. Development. 2009;136:1263–1272. doi: 10.1242/dev.034199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang M, Sheng L, Li H, Weng P, Li QF. Improvement of the skin flap survival with the bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells transplantation in a rat model. Microsurgery. 2010;30:275–281. doi: 10.1002/micr.20779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Changizi AS, Zohrabi M, Hassanpoor A, Hosseini N, Hajihashemi S. Oral administration of the aqueous extract of Rosmarinus officinalis in rats before renal reperfusion injury. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2013;7:367–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vedder NB, Bucky LP, Richey NL, Winn RK, May JW., Jr Improved survival rates of random flaps in rabbits with a monoclonal antibody that blocks leukocyte adherence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:1035. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199404001-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fang T, Lineaweaver WC, Chen MB, Kisner C, Zhang F. Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor on survival of surgical flaps: a review of experimental studies. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013;30:1. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1345429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vourtsis SA, Spyriounis PK, Agrogiannis GD, Ionac M, Papalois AE. VEGF application on rat skin flap survival. J Invest Surg. 2012;25:14–19. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2011.593693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Buemi M, Vaccaro M, Sturiale A, Galeano MR, Sansotta C, Cavallari V, Floccari F, D'Amico D, Torre V, Calapai G, Frisina N, Guarneri F, Vermiglio G. Recombinant human erythropoietin influences revascularization and healing in a rat model of random ischaemic flaps. Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82:411–417. doi: 10.1080/000155502762064520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Galeano M, Deodato B, Altavilla D, Cucinotta D, Arsic N, Marini H, Torre V, Giacca M, Squadrito F. Adeno-associated viral vector-mediated human vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer stimulates angiogenesis and wound healing in the genetically diabetic mouse. Diabetologia. 2003;46:546–555. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1064-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang H, Wang Y, Li D, Liu Z, Han D, Yuan Y, Bi J, Mei X. VEGF inhibits the inflammation in spinal cord injury through activation of autophagy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464:453–458. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xiong J, Xue FS, Yuan YJ, Wang Q, Liao X, Wang WL. Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway: a possible approach to protect against myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123:2720. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cui J, Liu L, Zou J, Qiao W, Liu H, Qi Y, Yan C. Protective effect of endogenous hydrogen sulfide against oxidative stress in gastric ischemia-reperfusion injury. Exp Ther Med. 2013;5:689. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sirota TV, Zakharchenko MV, Kondrashova MN. [Cytoplasmic superoxide dismutase activity is a sensitive indicator of the antioxidant status of the rat liver and brain]. [Article in Russian] BioMed Khim. 2014;60:63–71. doi: 10.18097/pbmc20146001063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kelly CP, Gupta A, Keskin M, Jackson IT. A new design of a dorsal flap in the rat to study skin necrosis and its prevention. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1553. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ozkan O, Ozgentas HE. Combination of rat vest, teeth shortening, and nail cutting to prevent autocannibalization and protect surgical flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1671. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000208874.61037.2b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cao B, Wang L, Lin D, Cai L, Gao W. Effects of lidocaine on random skin flap survival in rats. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:53–58. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang L, Zhou ZW, Yang LH, Tao XY, Feng XL, Ding J, Gao WY. Vasculature characterization of a multiterritory perforator flap: an experimental study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33:292–297. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1598011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tao XY, Wang L, Gao WY, Ding J, Feng XL, Zhou ZW, Yang LH. The effect of inducible nitric oxide synthase on multiterritory perforator flap survival in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016;32:643. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shi ZR, Itzkowitz SH, Kim YS. A comparison of three immunoperoxidase techniques for antigen detection in colorectal carcinoma tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 1988;36:317–322. doi: 10.1177/36.3.3278057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ozkan F, Senayli Y, Ozyurt H, Erkorkmaz U, Bostan B. Antioxidant effects of propofol on tourniquet-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury: an experimental study. J Surg Res. 2012;176:601. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES