Skip to main content
Journal of Thoracic Disease logoLink to Journal of Thoracic Disease
. 2017 Sep;9(9):E815–E826. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.54

Glomus tumors of the trachea: 2 case reports and a review of the literature

Chun Wang 1,*, Yuan Ma 2,*, Xin Zhao 2, Pei-Li Sun 2, Ying-Ming Zhang 1, Mao Huang 2, Yan Zhu 3, Shu-Xian Jin 2,
PMCID: PMC5708514  PMID: 29221350

Abstract

Glomus tumors (GTs) of the trachea are very rare neoplasms that usually arise from the distal portion of the respiratory tree. The origin of these tumors is modified smooth muscle cells of glomus bodies. In this study, we describe two cases of GT of the trachea, as well as the histologic features of these tumors and their treatments. One tumor was diagnosed via bronchoscopic biopsy, and the other tumor was diagnosed via surgery. Clinical follow-up showed that the two patients are alive and well after 8 and 15 months post-treatment, respectively. We also review the literature regarding GTs and discuss the clinical presentation, histologic features, differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of these tumors.

Keywords: Glomus tumor (GT), trachea, bronchoscopy

Introduction

Glomus tumors (GTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors composed of modified smooth muscle cells and normal glomus body cells that constitute less than 2% of all soft tissue tumors. The World Health Organization [2002] defined GTs as benign tumors comprising perivascular cells (1). This type of neoplasm was first reported in 1924 by Masson (2). Here, we describe two cases of GT that occurred in the trachea. In addition, we describe the findings of a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed database using “glomus tumor of trachea” and “bronchial glomus tumor” as key words. Sixty-eight cases of GT of the trachea have been reported publicly. The vast majority of the relevant articles are case reports, and their characteristics are presented in Table 1. We also review pertinent literature and discuss the clinical manifestations, pathological types, immunohistochemical expression patterns, differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GTs.

Table 1. Summary of literature review.

First author Year Age (years) Sex Symptoms Duration of symptoms before treatment Tumor site (S/M/I/B) Size (cm) Treatment Follow-up
Hussarek 1950 43 F Dyspnea Not stated S Bean-sized Tracheal resection Not stated
Fabich 1980 63 M Cough 2 years I 2.5×2.0×1.0 Sleeve resection Died of complications on the 10th post-op day
Warter 1980 69 M Dyspnea, hemoptysis Not stated M 2.3×1.5×1.5 Segmental resection Unremarkable
Heard 1982 50 M Dyspnea Not stated I 2.5×1.5×1.0 Sleeve resection Sepsis, died on the 15th post-op day
Ito 1988 51 M Hemoptysis 9 months S 1.5×1.2×1.0 Segmental resection 2 years
Sheffield 1988 74 M Cough, dyspnea <1 month I 2.2 Endoscopic resection 7 months
Kim 1989 54 F Cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis 3 years (cough) M 1.5×1.2 Segmental resection 13 months
Shin 1990 47 F Cough, hemoptysis 3 years I 1.5×1.0×1.0 Wedge resection Not stated
Garcia-Prats 1991 58 M Cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis Several years M 2.5×1.8 Segmental resection 8 months
Haraguchi 1991 61 M Asymptomatic Asymptomatic M 1.2 Sleeve resection Not stated
Arapantoni 1995 65 M Dyspnea, hemoptysis 3 months (dyspnea), 3 days (hemoptysis) I 4.5×3.0 Endoscopic resection and Nd-YAG 1 year
Koskinen 1998 66 M Asymptomatic Not stated I 2.0×3.0 Endoscopic resection, Nd-YAG and external radiotherapy Not stated
Watanabe 1998 43 M Hoarseness Not stated I 2.0×1.6×1.4 Sleeve resection 20 months
Lange 2000 20 M Asthma-like symptoms <1 month B 1.4×1.3×0.6 Bronchial sleeve resection 9 months
Menaissy 2000 34 M Hemoptysis 2 months M 2.4×2.1×1.6 Tracheal resection 4 months
Oizumi 2000 48 M Hemoptysis Not stated B 0.7 Bronchial resection 3 months
Gowan 2001 73 M Chest pain, dyspnea, hemoptysis 5 weeks M 1.6×0.3×0.6 Segmental resection 6 years
Yilmaz 2002 29 F Hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain Not stated B 1.5×1.0×0.5 Bronchial resection 17 months
Chien 2003 50 F Cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis 8 years (cough and dyspnea), 1 day (hemoptysis) I 2.5×2.5×2.0 Segmental resection 1 year
Vailati 2004 40 M Dyspnea, cough, fever 6 months B 5.0×1.5 Endoscopic resection 1 month
De Weerdt 2004 37 M Dyspnea, cough, fever 2 months B Not stated Endoscopic resection + cryotherapy + Nd-YAG laser 3 months
Nadrous 2004 39 M Hemoptysis 30 months S 2.0×1.5×1.5 Sleeve resection 3 months
Ren 2005 29 M Cough, dyspnea 2 years (cough), 2 months (dyspnea) I 1.7×2.0×1.7 Segmental resection Not stated
Takahashi 2005 67 M Cough Not stated B 0.8 Bronchial resection Not stated
Altinok 2006 83 F Dyspnea, hemoptysis 3 months S 2.0×1.5×1.2 Partial sleeve resection 1 year
Haver 2008 10 F Dyspnea, chest pain, cough 3 weeks M to I 1.8×1.3×1.3 Tracheal resection 2 years
Colaut 2008 70 M Dyspnea, wheezing 2 months M 2.0×1.0×1.0 Endoscopic resection and Nd-YAG 2 years
Akata 2008 39 M Cough <1 month B 2.5×2.5×2.0 Endoscopic resection 6 years
Shang 2010 59 M Chest pain, dyspnea cough 10 years I 2.0×1.0×0.5 Endoscopic resection + electrocautery 1 year
Shang 2010 22 F Cough, hemoptysis dyspnea 1 year I 1.8×1.5×1.4 Endoscopic resection + electrocautery 1 year
Nakajima 2010 30 M Hemoptysis 6 months B 1.5×1.3 Bronchial resection 10 months
Parker 2010 43 F Dyspnea, chest pain, cough 6 months I 2.0×1.6×1.5 Tracheal resection 11 months
Baek 2011 54 M Dyspnea, cough 3 months M 1.3×1.2 Tracheal resection 2 years
Mogi 2011 56 F Cough, dyspnea 7 months I 1.3×1.2×1.1 Tracheal sleeve resection 9 months
Ravenna 2011 79 F Dyspnea, cough 3 months B Not stated Endoscopic resection + Nd-YAG laser 5 years
Sakr 2011 66 M Cough, dyspnea 2 months (cough), 10 days (dyspnea) S 1.2×0.8×2.0 Endoscopic resection + tracheal sleeve resection 21 months
Okereke 2011 58 M Dyspnea Long term M 1.1 Tracheal resection 6 months
Santambrogio 2011 39 M Asymptomatic Not stated I 1.0 Tracheal resection 51 months
Gong 2011 35 F Dyspnea 1 year S 1.5×1.0 Tracheal resection Not stated
Norder 2012 49 F Cough, dyspnea 3 years S 1.2×1.1×1.1 Endoscopic resection Not stated
Lange-Lazdunki 2012 62 F Cough, dyspnea Not stated I 1.6 Left upper lung resection Not stated
Cukurova 2012 50 M Cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis Not stated S Not stated Endoscopic resection 3 years
Ariizumi 2012 43 F Asymptomatic 3 months B Not stated Tracheal resection 6 months
Zhu 2013 30 F Dyspnea, hemoptysis 1 year B 4.0×0.5×0.5 Tracheal resection 18 days
Fan 2013 15 M Cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis 3 months M 2.0×2.5 Tracheal resection 1 year
Ghigna 2013 70 M Hemoptysis Not stated I 1.6 Tracheal resection Not stated
Ghigna 2013 40 M Hemoptysis Not stated I 1.0 Tracheal resection Not stated
Chang 2013 76 M Fever 1 week M Not stated Endoscopic resection Not stated
Singh 2013 65 F Cough 3 months B 1.2×0.4×0.5 Endoscopic resection Not stated
Wei 2013 39 M Cough, hemoptysis 1 year S 1.9×1.4×0.8 Tracheal resection 26 months
Wei 2013 43 M Dyspnea 3 years I 2.0×1.5 Tracheal resection 19 months
Choi 2014 52 F Asymptomatic Asymptomatic B 1.6 Resection of carina and both main bronchi 3 months
Choi 2014 64 M Asymptomatic Asymptomatic M 2.6 Tracheal resection 2 years
Xiong 2014 55 M Cough, chest pain, hemoptysis 5 months (cough and chest pain), 13 days (hemoptysis) I 0.5×0.3×0.3 Bronchoscopic cryoablation with brachytherapy 6 months
Xiong 2014 48 F Cough, dyspnea 6 years I 1.2×1.0×0.8 Bronchoscopic cryoablation and argon plasma coagulation 6 months
Wu 2014 58 F Hemoptysis Not stated I 2.2×2.2 Tangential resection with spiral tracheoplasty 2 years
Zhang 2014 54 M Cough, hemoptysis 4 years B 2.5×1.5×1.0 Right total lung resection 6 months
Zhang 2014 48 M Cough 1 year B Not stated Right upper lung lesion resection 7 months
Huang 2015 39 F Dyspnea More than 1 year S 2.5×1.2 Segmental resection 1 month
Liu 2015 39 F Dyspnea More than 1 year S 2.5×1.2 Segmental resection 1 month
Li 2015 15 M Cough, hemoptysis 2 months M 1.2×1.0×1.0 High-frequency electrocautery and APC 3 months
Tan 2015 44 M Cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis 2 months I 3.0×2.5×1.0 Tracheal resection 20 months
Masoum 2015 21 M Cough, hemoptysis Several months S Not stated Endoscopic resection + tracheal resection 1 year
Fernandez-Bu 2015 48 M Hemoptysis and cough 3 months I 2.0×2.0 Endoscopic resection 2 years
Brzezinski 2015 38 M Dyspnea 1 year S 1.6×1.8×0.8 Tracheal resection Not stated
Rashid 2015 52 M Hemoptysis 3 months B Not stated Endoscopic resection 6 months
Xiong 2016 52 F Dyspnea, cough 6 months S 2.0×1.0×1.0 High-frequency electrocautery and APC 9 months
Aryan 2016 50 F Hemoptysis, cough, dyspnea 1 week B Not stated Endoscopic resection Not stated
Present case 2016 63 M Hemoptysis 1 week I 0.5×0.3 High-frequency electrocautery and APC 15 months
Present case 2016 44 M Hemoptysis, cough 1 week M 1.0×1.5 Endoscopic resection + tracheal resection 8 months

M, men; F, female; S/M/I/B, superior/medium/inferior/bronchi; Nd-YAG, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet; APC, argon plasma coagulation.

Case presentation

Case 1

A 63-year-old man with a 49-year history of cigarette smoking (49 packs/year) was admitted for a 1-week history of hemoptysis. The patient also complained of occasional cough and chest pain. He exhibited hypertension, but his physical examination demonstrated no abnormalities. A chest computed tomography (CT) series revealed the presence of a 0.5×0.3 cm2 solid lesion in the lower portion of the trachea, near its posterior wall (Figure 1A,B). Bronchoscopy revealed the presence of a cauliflower-like neoplasm with a rich blood supply arising from the posterior membrane of the lower trachea (Figure 1C). Bronchoscopic biopsy revealed the presence of a small round cell tumor, likely a GT, although it was necessary to rule out a diagnosis of a neuroendocrine tumor. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positive reactivity for vimentin (VIM), smooth muscle actin (SMA), Calponin and Bcl-2 and negative reactivity for cytokeratin (CK), NapsinA, Syn, CgA and CD34. Thus, a diagnosis of GT was made (Figure 2A-D). The patient was advised to undergo surgical treatment but refused because of the risks associated with surgery. He bled profusely during the fiberoptic bronchoscopy; therefore, we performed bronchial artery embolization (BAE) before performing bronchoscopic resection. The patient underwent high-frequency electrocauterization and flexible bronchoscopic argon-plasma coagulation (APC) for tumor removal. CT demonstrated no obvious abnormalities when the patient was reexamined 3 months after the procedure (Figure 2E,F), and the patient exhibited no symptoms or signs of recurrence when last examined at 15 months post-treatment. At present, the patient 1 described herein remains in good condition.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CT and Brochoscopic findings in Patient 1 before treatment. Chest CT images (A,B) of a tumor involving the lower portion of the trachea. The arrow indicates the glomus tumor. Brochoscopy (C) demonstrated a cauliflower-like neoplasm arising from the posterior membrane of the lower trachea.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, immunohistochemical staining in Patient 1 and CT findings after treatment. Single round cells with a uniform, clear or pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and hyperchromatic nuclei forming microvascular spaces were observed in histopathologic sections (A) (HE, ×200). Positive immunohistochemical staining for SMA (B) and VIM (C) and negative immunohistochemical staining for CK5 (D) were observed in the tumor cells (×200). CT did not show a glomus tumor (GT) in the tracheas after treatment (E,F) .

Case 2

A 44-year-old never smoking man was admitted for a 1-week history of cough and hemoptysis. His physical examination demonstrated no abnormalities. Chest CT revealed the presence of a 1.0×1.5 cm2 nodular lesion on the posterior wall of the upper portion of the trachea (Figure 3A,B). Bronchoscopy demonstrated a neoplasm rich in blood vessels arising from the posterior membrane of the upper trachea (Figure 3C). The patient subsequently underwent high-frequency electrocautery for tumor removal. Microscopically, the tumor consisted mainly of round or ovoid glomus cells surrounding thin-walled blood vessels. VIM, Syn and Bcl-2 immunohistochemical staining was positive, and SMA immunohistochemical staining was suspectedly positive. In contrast, desmin, CK, CD56, CD34 and EMA immunohistochemical staining was negative. The histological characteristics of the tissues were consistent with those of a neuroendocrine tumor, particularly a carcinoid tumor. The patient therefore underwent tracheal neoplasm resection and tracheoplasty. His surgery revealed that the diameter of his neoplasm was approximately 1 cm and that the lesion involved a portion of the middle tracheal wall approximately 20 cm from the incisors. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positive reactivity for VIM, SMA, Syn, Collagen IV and Bcl-2. The histological characteristics and immunohistochemical staining pattern of the tumor were consistent with the diagnosis of GT (Figure 4A,B). The tumor had infiltrated the smooth muscle, and this infiltration was accompanied by bone metaplasia and neuroendocrine marker expression. CT (Figure 4C,D) was repeated 3 months later and produced normal results, and the patient exhibited no evidence of recurrence 8 months after the procedure. However, patient 2 exhibited infiltrative tumor growth, as well as smooth muscle involvement, bone metaplasia and neuroendocrine expression. Therefore, patient 2 requires long-term follow-up.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

CT and Brochoscopic findings in Patient 2 before treatment. Chest CT images (A,B) of a tumor involving the posterior aspect of the upper portion of the trachea. The arrow indicates the glomus tumor. Brochoscopy (C) demonstrated a neoplasm rich in blood vessels arising from the posterior membrane of the upper trachea.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

HE staining, immunohistochemical staining in Patient 2 and CT findings after treatment. (A) Single round cells with a uniform, clear or pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and hyperchromatic nuclei forming microvascular spaces were observed in histopathologic sections (HE, ×200); (B) positive immunohistochemical staining for SMA (×200); (C,D) CT did not show a GT in the tracheas after treatment.

Discussion

Clinical epidemiology

GTs normally present as spheres comprising arterial and venous anastomoses that can be found over nearly the entire body (3). Glomus bodies are responsible for temperature control on the skin surface (4). Arteriovenous anastomoses are more common in the extremities than in other locations. In particular, GTs often develop in the nail beds of the extremities. Such tumors account for approximately 70% of all GTs, and lesions involving the torso and head and neck account for 20% of all GTs. GTs have also been reported to occur at unusual locations, such as the nose, sinuses, thoracic region, kidneys, stomach, mediastinum, heart, intestines, muscles, vagina, tendons, ligaments and lungs. Tracheal glomus tumors (TGTs) are fairly rare (5-12).

Macroscopic presentation

To our knowledge, 70 cases of GT, including those described in the above case reports, have been reported in literature to date. A summary of the clinical characteristics of and treatments provided for these previously reported GTGs is presented in Tables 1,2. This disease commonly occurs in middle-aged people and is more common among men than among women; specifically, the male: female ratio is 1.92:1. The average age of presentation is 48.8 years (range: 10–83 years). Some patients are asymptomatic (10%); therefore, their diagnoses require a medical examination. The most commonly presenting symptoms among symptomatic GT patients are dyspnea (52.86%), cough (51.43%) and hemoptysis (45.71%). Less frequently, patients can present with chest pain (8.57%). Hoarseness and fever are rare, as only approximately 7.14% of patients present with those symptoms. Most patients (64.29%) have the illness for longer than 1 month before presentation, and the longest reported disease duration before presentation is 10 years, suggesting that this type of tumor grows slowly. Physical examination findings often include low blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate, inspiratory dyspnea and wheezing, which is most audible above the clavicle or at the sternal midline during inspiration. Glands and blood vessels are more abundant in the lower bronchial mucosa than in the upper and middle bronchial mucosa (13). Kim et al. (14) reported that glomus-like structures can also be found in the tracheal membranous wall. Specifically, TGTs often occur in the posterior membranous wall of the lower trachea. The statistics regarding the locations of TGTs (upper: 20%, middle: 20%, lower: 34.29%, and bronchi: 24.29%) indicate that the lower 1/3 of the trachea is a common location. To date, only one GT, which was described in a case report by Haver et al. (15), has been demonstrated to involve the middle-lower portion of the trachea. In this study, patient 1 presented with a 0.5×0.3 cm2 tumor, the smallest GT reported to date. In contrast, Vailati has described tumors as large as 5×1.5 cm2. GTs are usually small, exhibiting a diameter of 1.0–2.5 cm, and generally display a clear border, a smooth surface, and numerous capillaries. Most of these tumors are benign and are thus unlikely to exhibit distant metastasis or deep infiltration. Zhang et al. (16) described a GT originating from the right main bronchus that obstructed the bronchial cavity and invaded the upper and middle portions of the bronchus, and Huang et al. (17) described a GT in the upper bronchus with invasive growth involving all layers of the bronchial wall and the outer membrane of the esophagus. Fernandez-Bussy et al. (18) described GTs involving the trachea and the left forearm. The possibility of other distant metastases could not be completely ruled out in these cases.

Table 2. Summary of previous cases includes in our review.

Characteristic Number %
Sex
   Men 46 65.71
   Female 24 34.29
Symptoms
   Hemoptysis 32 45.71
   Cough 36 51.43
   Dyspnea 37 52.86
   Asymptomatic 7 10.00
   Chest pain 6 8.57
   Others 5 7.14
Tumor site
   Superior 14 20.00
   Medium 14 20.00
   Inferior 24 34.29
   Bronchi 17 24.29
   Medium to Inferior 1 1.43
Duration of symptoms before treatment
   ≤1 month 8 11.43
   2–12 months 24 34.29
   ≥1 year 20 28.57
   Not stated 14 20.00
   Asymptomatic 3 4.29
   Long term 1 1.43
Treatment
   Surgical 47 67.14
   Endoscopic 23 32.86
   Endoscopic resection + tracheal resection 3 4.29
   Endoscopic resection + external radiotherapy 2 2.86

Microscopic features

Regarding morphology, GTs can present as single tumors or multiple tumors and can also exhibit distant metastases. Multiple GTs are rare and account for approximately 10–25% of GT cases (13). Typical GTs are classified as solid GTs, glomangiomas and glomangiomyomas, depending on their dominant component (19). The classification system proposed by Folpe et al. (20) in 2001 organized atypical GTs into the following categories: malignant GTs (MGTs), GTs of uncertain malignant potential (UMPGTs), symplastic GTs (SGTs) and glomangiomatosis (GGS). Despite being benign lesions, GTs may behave as aggressive and malignant tumors. The literature regarding MGTs and UMPGTs indicates that approximately 10 cases have been reported thus far and that the incidence of these tumors has gradually increased in recent years. The diagnosis of MGT is reserved for tumors larger than 2 cm in a subfascial or visceral location showing atypical mitotic figures or marked nuclear atypia and exhibiting any level of mitotic activity. The diagnosis of UMPGT is reserved for superficial tumors exhibiting high mitotic activity, deep tumors or large tumors.

Histological and immunohistochemical features

Carcinoid tumors and hemangiopericytomas arise from the submucosa of the trachea, and consist of sheets and nests of cells surrounding numerous vascular spaces (21). Therefore, they are easily mistaken for GTs. Our second patient underwent neoplasm resection because he was diagnosed with a carcinoid tumor via bronchoscopic biopsy. This diagnosis was confirmed via postoperative pathological examination. We identified three patients who exhibited similar presentations. As TGTs are easily missed and often misdiagnosed, we diagnose these tumors on the basis of their histopathological characteristics and immunohistochemical staining patterns (Table 3). GT cells are round or oval in shape and line up tightly. They exhibit strong positive staining for SMA, VIM and type IV collagen but do not stain positive for neuroendocrine and epithelial markers, including chromogranin, CK, desmin and S-100 protein. Carcinoid tumors have less vascular mass, and their cells are arranged as nests. These tumors stain positive for neuroendocrine markers, such as NSE, CgA, chromogranin and synaptophysin, but stain negative for SMA and VIM. Hemangiopericytomas usually consist of new blood vessels and stroma and display staghorn-like vascular features. These tumors stain positive for CD34, Bcl-2 and VIM but stain negative for desmin and SMA.

Table 3. Antibody panel used in this case study.

Characteristic Glomus tumor Carcinoid tumor Hemangiopericytoma
SMA (+) (−) (−)
VIM (+) (−) (+)
CD34 (−) (−) (+)
CK (−) (+) (−)
Neuroendocrine (−) (+) (−)

SMA, smooth muscle actin; VIM, vimentin; CK, cytokeratin.

Treatment

Surgery is considered the first-choice treatment for GT. The currently available data indicate that 67.14% of the 70 reported patients were ultimately treated via surgical resection and that 32.86% of patients underwent endoscopic removal of their tumors. Currently, segmental tracheal resection with an end-to-end anastomosis is the preferred method of treating GTs surgically. However, some patients have been treated via tracheal sleeve resection or tracheal wedge resection. Wu et al. (22) proposed performing a longitudinal resection with spiral tracheoplasty. This method can significantly mitigate tracheal tissue injury and is therefore applicable for patients with larger lesions requiring more extensive tracheal resection. Endobronchial therapy can be administered to patients who are unfit for surgical excision or who refuse surgery. Common endobronchial therapy techniques include laser resection, high-frequency electrocoagulation and APC. Because TGTs have a rich blood supply, bronchoscopic biopsy with forceps should be avoided. In this study, patient 1 experienced severe bleeding during his fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Therefore, bronchoscopic resection was performed after BAE, during which the patient experienced only a small amount of intraoperative bleeding. However, the feasibility and necessity of this method remain unknown. Masoum et al. (23) reported the case of a 21-year-old male patient who underwent bronchoscopic GT resection who experienced postoperative recurrence after 1 year. The patient underwent another resection and exhibited no signs of recurrence after 1 year of follow-up. Therefore, TGT patients should be treated with surgery instead of bronchoscopic therapy.

Prognosis

To date, the reports in the literature indicate that 2 of the 70 patients with GT died of postoperative complications, whereas the remaining patients have been followed for periods ranging from 1–5 years and have exhibited good recovery in most cases. Distant metastasis of MGT is the major cause of death. The rate of metastasis is 31.2–38.0% (20), and tumors often recur between 3 and 4 years after surgery (24). However, Choi et al. (25) reported a case of TGT in which a postoperative bronchoscopy performed 2 months after surgical resection demonstrated a white neoplasm at the anastomosis site. Pathological examination revealed the presence of a granuloma, although a malignant GT could not be completely ruled out. Therefore, a bronchoscopic en bloc resection was performed. There have been rare reports regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy after TGT surgery, namely, two reports by Koskinen et al. (26) and Xiong et al. (27), respectively, and the effectiveness of this therapy is currently unclear.

Acknowledgements

Funding: This work was supported by the Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation, China (SBK2017042749), Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. 324), and Jiangsu Province’s Young Medical Talents Program, China (QNRC2016600).

Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Jo VY, Fletcher CD. WHO classification of soft tissue tumours: an update based on the 2013 (4th) edition. Pathology 2014;46:95-104. 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shen J, Shrestha S, Yen YH, et al. Pericyte Antigens in Perivascular Soft Tissue Tumors. Int J Surg Pathol 2015;23:638-48. 10.1177/1066896915591272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shrestha S, Shen J, Giacomelli P, et al. Ang-2 but not Ang-1 expression in perivascular soft tissue tumors. J Orthop 2016;14:147-153. 10.1016/j.jor.2016.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kleontas A, Barbetakis N, Asteriou C, et al. Primary glomangiosarcoma of the lung: A case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;5:76. 10.1186/1749-8090-5-76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Geramizadeh B, Khorshidi A, Hodjati H. Chronic Long Standing Shoulder Pain, Caused by Glomus Tumor. Rare Tumors 2015;7:5666. 10.4081/rt.2015.5666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Troller R, Soll C, Breitenstein S. Glomus tumour of the stomach. BMJ Case Rep 2016:2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lamba G, Rafiyath SM, Kaur H, et al. Malignant glomus tumor of kidney: the first reported case and review of literature. Hum Pathol 2011;42:1200-3. 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elkrinawi R, Usta E, Baumbach H, et al. Late recurrence of a cardiac glomus tumor. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;60:305-6. 10.1055/s-0030-1270899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rodríguez JM, Idoate MA, Pardo-Mindán FJ. The role of mast cells in glomus tumours: report of a case of an intramuscular glomus tumour with a prominent mastocytic component. Histopathology 2003;42:307-8. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.15355.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yilmaz A, Bayramgurler B, Aksoy F, et al. Pulmonary glomus tumour: a case initially diagnosed as carcinoid tumour. Respirology 2002;7:369-71. 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2002.t01-1-00385.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miettinen M, Paal E, Lasota J, et al. Gastrointestinal glomus tumors: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 32 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:301-11. 10.1097/00000478-200203000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Okereke IC, Sheski FD, Cummings OW. Glomus tumor of the trachea. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:1290-1. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31821f967d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schiefer TK, Parker WL, Anakwenze OA, et al. Extradigital glomus tumors: a 20-year experience. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:1337-44. 10.4065/81.10.1337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim YI, Kim JH, Suh JS, et al. Glomus tumor of the trachea. Report of a case with ultrastructural observation. Cancer 1989;64:881-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Haver KE, Hartnick CJ, Ryan DP, et al. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 10-2008. A 10-year-old girl with dyspnea on exertion. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1382–90. 10.1056/NEJMcpc0800629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang X, Zhu Y, Wang X, et al. Bronchial glomus tumor: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2014;37:758-63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang C, Liu QF, Chen XM, et al. A malignant glomus tumor in the upper trachea. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:1812-4. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fernandez-Bussy S, Labarca G, Rodriguez M, et al. Concomitant tracheal and subcutaneous glomus tumor: Case report and review of the literature. Respir Med Case Rep 2015;16:81-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sakr L, Palaniappan R, Payan MJ, et al. Tracheal glomus tumor: a multidisciplinary approach to management. Respir Care 2011;56:342-6. 10.4187/respcare.00761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M, et al. Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:1-12. 10.1097/00000478-200101000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gowan RT, Shamji FM, Perkins DG, et al. Glomus tumor of the trachea. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:598-600. 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02278-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wu HH, Jao YT, Wu MH. Glomus tumor of the trachea managed by spiral tracheoplasty. Am J Case Rep 2014;15:459-65. 10.12659/AJCR.891191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Masoum SH, Jafarian AH, Attar AR, et al. Glomus tumor of the trachea. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2015;23:325-7. 10.1177/0218492314528184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang Y, Li H, Zhang WQ. Malignant glomus tumor of the esophagus with mediastinal lymph node metastases. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1464-6. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Choi IH, Song DH, Kim J, et al. Two cases of glomus tumor arising in large airway: well organized radiologic, macroscopic and microscopic findings. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2014;76:34-7. 10.4046/trd.2014.76.1.34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Koskinen SK, Niemi PT, Ekfors TO, et al. Glomus tumor of the trachea. Eur Radiol 1998;8:364-6. 10.1007/s003300050395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiong W, Cai C, Zhou Y, et al. Tracheal glomus tumor: two cases with bronchoscopic intervention. Chin Med J (Engl) 2014;127:189-90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Thoracic Disease are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

RESOURCES