Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2017 Feb 13;123(12):2352–2359. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30581

Table IV.

Risks and Benefits of Clinical CGES in Pediatric Oncology

All (N=52) Role
P Somatic Confidencea
Germline Confidenceb
Fellow (n=22) Physician (n=30) Non-confident (n=29) Confident (n=23) P Non-confident (n=31) Confident (n=21) P
What do you perceive as potential risk for your patients and their families by participating in this study? Check all that apply.

Psychological impact 38 (73) 14 (64) 24 (80) NS# 21 (72) 17 (74) NS# 22 (71) 16 (76) NS#
Loss of insurability 24 (46) 8 (36) 16 (53) NS# 13 (45) 11 (48) NS# 13 (42) 11 (52) NS#
Privacy or Confidentiality impact 18 (35) 5 (23) 13 (43) NS# 12 (41) 6 (26) NS# 13 (42) 5 (24) NS#

What do you perceive as potential benefits for your patients and families by participating in this study? Check all that apply.

Identification of the cause for the patient’s cancer 31 (60) 12 (55) 19 (63) NS# 16 (55) 15 (65) NS# 16 (52) 15 (71) NS#
Help detailing the cancer risk in the family. 36 (69) 13 (59) 23 (77) NS# 20 (69) 16 (70) NS# 20 (65) 16 (76) NS#
Facilitating surveillance and early treatment for second cancers in the patient. 39 (75) 16 (73) 23 (77) NS# 21 (72) 17 (81) NS# 22 (71) 17 (81) NS#
Facilitating surveillance and early treatment for cancer in family members. 39 (75) 16 (73) 23 (77) NS# 22 (76) 17 (74) NS# 22 (71) 17 (81) NS#

Data presented as frequency (percent).

a

Defined as confidence in knowledge of interpreting results of somatic genomic findings.

b

Defined as confidence in knowledge of interpreting results of germline genomic findings.

NS# = Not statistically significant