Skip to main content
PMC home page
Korean Circulation Journal logoLink to Korean Circulation Journal
. 2017 Sep 18;47(6):811–822. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0027

Differences in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Compared with Western Registries

Doo Sun Sim 1, Myung Ho Jeong 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5711672  PMID: 29035427

Abstract

The Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) is the first nationwide registry that reflects current therapeutic approaches and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) management in Korea. The results of the KAMIR demonstrated different risk factors and responses to medical and interventional treatments. The results indicated that the incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was relatively high, and that the prevalence of dyslipidemia was relatively low with higher triglyceride and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates were high for both STEMI and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with higher use of drug-eluting stents (DESs). DES were effective and safe without increased risk of stent thrombosis in Korean AMI patients. Triple antiplatelet therapy, consisting of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol, was effective in preventing adverse clinical outcomes after PCI. Statin therapy was effective in Korean AMI patients, including those with very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and those with cardiogenic shock. The KAMIR score had a greater predictive value than Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scores for long-term mortality in AMI patients. Based on these results, the KAMIR will be instrumental for establishing new therapeutic strategies and effective methods for secondary prevention of AMI and guidelines for Asian patients.

Keywords: Myocardial infarction, Risk factors, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, Percutaneous coronary intervention

INTRODUCTION

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. The Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) is the first nationwide, multicenter data collection registry, including 55 community and teaching hospitals in Korea, with patients in all stages of AMI. Since the KAMIR was started in 2005, more than 62,000 patients have been registered, and a total of 178 papers have been published.

KAMIR STUDY OUTCOMES

The KAMIR study showed that Korean AMI patients had different characteristics compared with Western AMI registries with respect to etiologies, risk factors, drug responses, and treatment strategies.1),2),3),4),5),6) These findings have provided important information to predict prognosis as well as better diagnostic and treatment tools to improve the quality of care, tailored for Korean AMI patients. The KAMIR study was limited, however, because it provided data of up to 1-year follow-up, although this has been improved by increased quality and database registry utility.

TEMPORAL TRENDS IN AMI INCIDENCE AND OUTCOMES

The incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) decreased from 60.5% in 2006 to 48.1% in 2013, while the incidence of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) increased from 39.5% in 2006 to 51.9% in 2013. The ratio of STEMI/NSTEMI in Korea changed in 2012 when a higher incidence of NSTEMI than STEMI was reported (Figure 1A). In-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI remained relatively constant, but in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI decreased (Figure 1B).1) Compared with Western registries, the proportion of STEMI was relatively high in the KAMIR (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Annual incidence rates of STEMI and NSTEMI from 2006 to 2013. (B) Annual in-hospital mortality rates of STEMI and NSTEMI from 2006 to 2013.

NSTEMI = non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI = ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with AMI in Korea compared with other registries.

Registry Title KAMIR GRACE SCAAR NRMI MINAP SWEDEHEART/RIKS-HIA
Region Korea Europe, America Sweden US UK Sweden
Time period Nov 2005–Oct 2010 2004–2007 Jan 2003–Dec 2004 1994–2006 Jan 2004–Dec 2010 Jan 2004–Dec 2010
Sample size 27,852 28,449 19,771 542,008 391,077 119,786
Follow-up rate (%) NA 89.8 95.2 NA NA NA
Follow-up duration 231.6 days 2 years 3 years NA NA NA
Demographics
Mean or median age (years) 63.2 65.0 65.7 64.0 69.5 71.2
Male (%) 75.0 68.4 72.0 59.0 65.2 63.7
Comorbidities (%)
Hypertension 45.9 64.7 44.5 52.3 47.3 45.2
DM 24.6 25.2 18.1 22.4 17.6 22.7
Dyslipidemia 9.5 53.0 NA 28.0 NA NA
Smoking 62.8 59.8 20.4 31.3 29.5 23.3
Previous MI 11.1 30.3 37.4 NA 18.3 22.4
Family history of CAD 7.9 NA NA 28.0 NA NA
CVA 5.6 NA 6.0 NA 8.5 10.1
HF 1.1 8.8 7.4 NA 5.3 9.7
STEMI (%) 56.6 35.9 22.6 41.8 40.3 32.1
Multivessel disease (%) 52.7 NA 50.0 NA NA NA
DES (%) 91.1 NA 30.5 NA NA NA
PCI success rate (%) 99.0 NA NA NA NA NA
Open in a new tab

Rate of follow-up at 6 months. Data modified from Table 1 of Kim et al.2)

AMI = acute myocardial infarction; CAD = coronary artery disease; DES = drug-eluting stent; DM = diabetes mellitus; HF = heart failure; KAMIR = Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry; GRACE = Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; SCAAR = Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry; MI = myocardial infarction; MINAP = Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project; NA = not available; NRMI = National Registry of Myocardial Infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI = ST-elevation myocardial infarction; SWEDEHEART/RIKS-HIA = Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies/Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions.

RISK FACTORS

Risk factors of Korean AMI patients are different from those of Western patients (Table 1). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia has increased, but the prevalence of smoking and obesity has decreased. Previously, smoking was the most common risk factor in Korean AMI patients. The prevalence of smoking decreased from 62.0% in 2006 to 44.6% in 2013 in STEMI patients and from 51.1% in 2006 to 34.5% in 2013 in NSTEMI patients.1) Smoking in female patients is a predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).7)

The prevalence of dyslipidemia is relatively low and the pattern of dyslipidemia differs in Korean patients. Korean patients have a lower incidence of high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and higher incidence of high triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. About half of the patients have low HDL-C, and one-quarter of the patients have high TG. Statin therapy was not effective for preventing clinical events, based on 2-year follow-up in this patient population, and a TG/HDL-C ratio >3.35 was associated with overall increased risk of MACE.8) These findings suggest different benefits of statin therapy in Korean patients.5) Low HDL-C after overnight fasting is associated with in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients, but not in NSTEMI patients.9) MACE was associated with more than 50% reduction of LDL-C from baseline, but not with targeting an LDL-C <70 mg/dL in Korean patients.10)

The prevalence of hypertension was similar in both populations, but the mean systolic blood pressure at admission was lower.2) Korean AMI patients were more likely to exhibit a J-curve phenomenon: low blood pressure (<100/60 mmHg) and high blood pressure (>170/100 mmHg) were associated with MACE.11)

The prevalence of diabetes is higher in Korean patients.2) Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) and hyperglycemia (≥260 mg/dL) at admission were associated with higher 1-month mortality rates in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Hypoglycemia in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients predicted 1-month mortality in AMI patients.12) According to the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, undernutrition at admission was present in 18% of patients13) and was associated with post-myocardial infarction (MI) complications and in-hospital mortality.

INTERVENTIONAL STRATEGIES

The KAMIR evaluated various interventional strategies and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex coronary lesions in AMI setting. Primary PCI is the preferred reperfusion strategy in Korean STEMI patients. About 91% of patients with STEMI that presented <12 hours from symptom onset were treated by primary PCI, and the median door-to-balloon time in STEMI patients was 78 minutes.14) Shorter door-to-balloon time was not significantly correlated with 1-month mortality, although total ischemic time <180 minutes was an independent predictor of 1-month survival.15) Shortening symptom-to-door time might be more important than reducing door-to-balloon time in Korea, which indicates the importance of early pharmacologic therapy. For patients undergoing successful thrombolytic therapy, early elective PCI within 48 hours was associated with more favorable clinical outcomes than patients that later underwent PCI.16) The comparison between pharmacoinvasive strategy (defined as thrombolytic therapy followed by PCI) and primary PCI showed that the pharmacoinvasive group had shorter time to reperfusion therapy, a higher rate of pre-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3, and similar 1-year survival rates. Equipoise between pharmacoinvasive strategy and primary PCI occurred when PCI-related delay was ≈100 minutes.14) These findings were consistent with observations from Western studies.17),18) The clinical benefit of reperfusion is controversial for stable patients with STEMI that present >24 hours after symptom onset.19),20) In the KAMIR, stable early latecomers of STEMI that presented 12 to 72 hours after symptom onset had lower mortality and a lower incidence of death or MI at 12 months when they received PCI.21)

For patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), immediate invasive approach has diagnostic benefits, facilitates treatment logistics, and can prevent further complications.22) The KAMIR demonstrated that an immediate invasive approach was not associated with a statistically significant decrease of the 12-month rates of death, MI, death/MI, or MACE, but was associated with lower major bleeding risk and shorter hospital stay.23) NSTEMI with chronic kidney disease (CKD) management indicated that a deferred invasive strategy was associated with higher 1-year death/MI-free survival than early invasive treatment.24) In octogenarian patients with NSTEMI, MACE-free survival was similar between early and delayed interventions at 1-year.25)

In AMI patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis undergoing PCI from the KAMIR, culprit LMCA was associated with higher in-hospital mortality than non-culprit LMCA (16.0% vs. 8.9%; p=0.008), with similar clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up.26) Compared to coronary artery bypass graft surgery, PCI using drug-eluting stents (DESs) was more frequently performed for LMCA, with similar early and 12-month clinical outcomes. Multi-vessel PCI in NSTEMI patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) was associated with higher 1-year MACE-free survival and death/MI-free survival rates compared with culprit-only PCI.27) Staged PCI in STEMI patients with multi-vessel disease compared to ad hoc or culprit-only PCI was associated with lower rates of cardiac death and MACE at 3 years, without an increase of repeat PCI.28)

There are several unique characteristics of revascularization strategies for Korean AMI patients. First, PCI was performed in 96.7% and 82.7% of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively, and the procedural success rates were 99.4% and 99.5%, which is relatively higher than in Western countries.2) Second, the DES penetration rate in AMI patients was >90% (97% currently) in Korea. Several observational studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DES in Korean AMI patients have been published and have indicated that the event rates were lower after DES implantation compared to bare metal stent (BMS), suggesting that DES could safely and effectively treat AMI patients without increasing the risks of mortality, MI, and stent thrombosis.6) DES in large vessels (≥3.5 mm) in AMI was associated with lower repeat revascularization compared to BMS, without compromising the overall safety over the course of 1-year follow-up.29) Zotarolimus- and everoliumus-eluting stents showed comparable clinical outcomes in STEMI patients with CKD undergoing primary PCI.30) In octogenarian AMI patients, DES was associated with lower stent thrombosis rates compared to BMS, with similar target vessel failure-free survival at 1-year.31) In patients with metabolic syndrome and AMI, Resolute® zotarolimus-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting stents (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) showed comparable outcomes in target lesion failure and MACE at 1-year.32) In addition, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI was performed in approximately 20% of AMI patients in Korea, but IVUS guidance was not an independent predictor of 12-month all-cause death in AMI patients that underwent PCI.33)

Clinical benefits of manual thrombus aspiration (TA) during primary PCI remain controversial.34),35),36) TA during primary PCI in STEMI patients in the KAMIR did not reduce MACE, but subgroup analysis indicated that administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and culprit lesions in the left anterior descending artery were associated with lower MACE.37) More recently, the benefit of manual TA during primary PCI in relation to total ischemic time was evaluated in 5,641 patients with STEMI (<12 hours) from the KAMIR who underwent primary PCI. After propensity matching (n=1,162 for each group), there were no differences in the 12-month outcomes between TA and PCI only. The effect of TA on 12-month outcome showed a U-shaped relationship, indicating that the impact of TA might become clinically relevant with longer total ischemic time.38)

MEDICAL TREATMENT

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor blocker is recommended for all patients undergoing PCI with stenting. To prevent ischemic events after PCI, the safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy (cilostazol for at least 1-month, adding to aspirin and P2Y12 receptor blocker) was evaluated in patients with STEMI that were treated with primary PCI using DES.39) At 8 months, the triple antiplatelet therapy group had significantly lower rates of cardiac death (2.0% vs. 3.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–0.84; p=0.007) and MACE (7.6% vs. 9.3%; OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58–0.95; p=0.019), without an increased risk of major bleeding.39)

The safety and efficacy profile of some antiplatelet agents can differ depending on the patient's ethnicity. A small randomized study showed that aspirin plus prasugrel of both standard and low maintenance doses (10 mg and 5 mg) in STEMI patients was associated with lower levels of platelet reactivity units compared with triple anti-platelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol), suggesting that, contrary to Western patients, low dose prasugrel might be effective in Korean AMI patients.40) In addition, the KAMIR analysis showed that the usual dose of ticagrelor did not reduce the incidence of MACE, but increased TIMI major and minor bleeding risks, which indicates that a lower dose of ticagrelor might be necessary in Korean AMI patients.3)

Oral beta-blockers are recommended for all patients without contraindications who have suffered STEMI.41) The benefit of a long-term beta-blockade is not well established in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function. The effect of beta-blocker therapy on clinical outcomes in STEMI patients that underwent primary PCI was investigated in 20,344 patients in the KAMIR. After propensity-score matching, beta-blocker use was associated with a lower rate of all-cause death (2.8% vs. 4.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27–0.78; p=0.004).42)

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) could be used as an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in STEMI patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.43),44) However, the benefit of ARB is uncertain in patients with STEMI with preserved left ventricular systolic function. The effect of ARB therapy on clinical outcomes was evaluated in 6,698 patients with STEMI in the KAMIR who underwent primary PCI and had preserved left ventricular systolic function. After propensity score matching, patients receiving ARB had a lower rate of cardiac death or MI compared to the no renin-angiotensin system blocker group (1.7% vs. 3.1%; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.90; p=0.030).4) Treatment with insurmountable ARB such as valsartan, candersartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, and olmesartan was associated with lower MACE at 1-year compared to treatment with surmountable ARB such as losartan and eprosartan in Korean AMI patients.45) Use of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor in STEMI patients undergoing late PCI reduced the 1-year MACE, even in low-risk patients with relatively preserved left ventricular systolic function.46)

Intensive statin therapy should be initiated as early as possible in all patients with ACS.47),48) Statin therapy in AMI patients with LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (n=1,054) in the KAMIR significantly reduced the risks of cardiac death (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.93; p=0.031) and MACE (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34–0.89; p=0.015).49) Early statin therapy in statin-naïve AMI patients with cardiogenic shock who underwent revascularization was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and MACE at 1-year.50) Statin therapy for spasm-induced AMI patients improved MACE-free survival at 1-year.51) Statin plus ezetimibe did not significantly reduce MACE compared with high-intensity statin in Korea AMI patients.52) On subgroup analysis, however, statin plus ezetimibe was effective in high-risk patients, such as those with diabetes mellitus, old age, and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

RISK ASSESSMENT

Risk assessment scores that were specific for Korean AMI patient were developed from the KAMIR. The KAMIR score for NSTEMI consisted of the TIMI risk index, Killip class, and serum creatinine,53) and the KAMIR hospital discharge score for AMI was composed of age, Killip class, PCI use, serum creatinine, LVEF <40% and admission hyperglycemia >180 mg/dL.54) Both scores showed better predictive values than previous scoring systems established in Western countries, including TIMI or Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scores (Figure 2). In addition, other risk scoring systems, including CHA2DS2-VASC score, high sensitive C-reactive protein, simple age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) were validated in the KAMIR population.55),56),57) About 50% of STEMI patients had one or more non-infarct-related artery (IRA) lesions, and the presence of IRA stenosis was associated with a significant increase in 30-day mortality in STEMI patients (3.6% vs. 2.5%; risk difference, 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.6%–1.7%; p<0.001).58)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) A new risk score for predicting 1-year death from AMI. (B) Receiver operator characteristic curves for 1-year mortality in patients with AMI.

AMI = acute myocardial infarction; GRACE = Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.

CONCLUSION

AMI is a major challenge for health care systems. The KAMIR has allowed prospective follow-up to assess the incidence and characteristics of AMI and to perform comprehensive analyses of AMI in the Korean population. The feedback from this registry will help with continuous tracking, outcome measurement, and adherence to evidence-based care processes for AMI. The KAMIR has provided and will provide vital contributions to the assessment and improvement of treatment outcomes in patients with AMI. Ultimately, the KAMIR study will be instrumental for establishing Asian AMI guidelines.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was performed with the support of the Korean Circulation Society in commemoration of its 50th Anniversary.

Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) Investigators: Myung Ho Jeong, MD, Young Keun Ahn, MD, Shung Chull Chae, MD, Jong Hyun Kim, MD, Seung Ho Hur, MD, Young Jo Kim, MD, In Whan Seong, MD, Dong Hoon Choi, MD, Jei Keon Chae, MD, Taek Jong Hong, MD, Jae Young Rhew, MD, Doo Il Kim, MD, In Ho Chae, MD, Jung Han Yoon, MD, Bon Kwon Koo, MD, Byung Ok Kim, MD, Myoung Yong Lee, MD, Kee Sik Kim, MD, Jin Yong Hwang, MD, Myeong Chan Cho, MD, Seok Kyu Oh, MD, Nae Hee Lee, MD, Kyoung Tae Jeong, MD, Seung Jea Tahk, MD, Jang Ho Bae, MD, Seung-Woon Rha, MD, Keum Soo Park, MD, Chong Jin Kim, MD, Kyoo Rok Han, MD, Tae Hoon Ahn, MD, Moo Hyun Kim, MD, Ki Bae Seung, MD, Wook Sung Chung, MD, Ju Young Yang, MD, Chong Yun Rhim, MD, Hyeon Cheol Gwon, MD, Seong Wook Park, MD, Young Youp Koh, MD, Seung Jae Joo, MD, Soo Joong Kim, MD, Dong Kyu Jin, MD, Jin Man Cho, MD, Yang Soo Jang, MD, Jeong Gwan Cho, MD, and Seung Jung Park, MD.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions:
  • Conceptualization: Jeong MH.
  • Data curation: Sim DS.
  • Formal analysis: Sim DS.
  • Investigation: Sim DS.
  • Methodology: Sim DS.
  • Project administration: Jeong MH.
  • Resources: Sim DS.
  • Supervision: Jeong MH.
  • Validation: Jeong MH.
  • Writing - original draft: Sim DS.
  • Writing - review & editing: Jeong MH.

References

  • 1.Kook HY, Jeong MH, Oh S, et al. Current trend of acute myocardial infarction in Korea (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from 2006 to 2013) Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:1817–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim JH, Chae SC, Oh DJ, et al. Multicenter cohort study of acute myocardial infarction in Korea: interim analysis of the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health Registry. Circ J. 2016;80:1427–1436. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park KH, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing successful revascularization; from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health. Int J Cardiol. 2016;215:193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang JH, Hahn JY, Song YB, et al. Angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular systolic function: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014;349:g6650. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim KH, Kim CH, Jeong MH, et al. Differential benefit of statin in secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction according to the level of triglyceride and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Korean Circ J. 2016;46:324–334. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.3.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, Kang JC. The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction (KAMIR) Int J Cardiol. 2013;163:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jeong YA, Jeong MH, Jeong HC, et al. Impact of smoking on clinical outcomes in female patients with acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J. 2015;45:22–27. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2015.45.1.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim JS, Kim W, Woo JS, et al. The predictive role of serum triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio according to renal function in patients with acute myocardial infarction. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ji MS, Jeong MH, Ahn YK, et al. Impact of low level of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol sampled in overnight fasting state on the clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (difference between ST-segment and non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction) J Cardiol. 2015;65:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cho KH, Jeong MH, Park KW, et al. Comparison of the effects of two low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction in real-world practice: ≥ 50% reduction from baseline versus <70 mg/dL. Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:478–485. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cho JY, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Impact of high admission blood pressure without history of hypertension on clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction: from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172:e54–e58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee SA, Cho SJ, Jeong MH, et al. Hypoglycemia at admission in patients with acute myocardial infarction predicts a higher 30-day mortality in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes than in well-controlled patients. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2366–2373. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yoo SH, Kook HY, Hong YJ, Kim JH, Ahn Y, Jeong MH. Influence of undernutrition at admission on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2017;69:555–560. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sim DS, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Pharmacoinvasive strategy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a propensity score-matched analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e003508. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim HK, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Relationship between time to treatment and mortality among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention according to Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. J Cardiol. 2017;69:377–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sim DS, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Safety and benefit of early elective percutaneous coronary intervention after successful thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1333–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrières J, et al. Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI) Circulation. 2008;118:268–276. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein P, et al. Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1379–1387. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC, Jr, et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2205–2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909–2945. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sim DS, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention in early latecomers with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:1275–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Riezebos RK, Verheugt FW. Timing of angiography in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2013;99:1867–1873. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sim DS, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Clinical impact of immediate invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:937–943. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hachinohe D, Jeong MH, Saito S, et al. Management of non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease (from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry) Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Piao ZH, Jeong MH, Jin L, et al. Clinical impact of early intervention in octogenarians with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172:462–464. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sim DS, Ahn Y, Jeong MH, et al. Clinical outcome of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int Heart J. 2013;54:185–191. doi: 10.1536/ihj.54.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim MC, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. What is optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? Multivessel or culprit-only revascularization. Int J Cardiol. 2011;153:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim MC, Jeong MH, Park KH, et al. Three-year clinical outcomes of staged, ad hoc and culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176:505–507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sim DS, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Effectiveness of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in large coronary arteries in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26:521–527. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.4.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ahmed K, Jeong MH, Chakraborty R, et al. Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and chronic kidney disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiol. 2014;64:273–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Piao ZH, Jeong MH, Li Y, et al. Comparison of second-generation drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in octogenarian patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2014;177:1081–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ji MS, Jeong MH, Ahn YK, et al. Comparison of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting stents in patients with metabolic syndrome and acute myocardial infarction: propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;199:53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ahmed K, Jeong MH, Chakraborty R, et al. Role of intravascular ultrasound in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, van der Horst IC, et al. Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2008;371:1915–1920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60833-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1587–1597. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lagerqvist B, Fröbert O, Olivecrona GK, et al. Outcomes 1 year after thrombus aspiration for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1111–1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hachinohe D, Jeong MH, Saito S, et al. Clinical impact of thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. J Cardiol. 2012;59:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2011.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sim DS, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Manual thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Impact of total ischemic time. J Cardiol. 2017;69:428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen KY, Rha SW, Li YJ, et al. Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2009;119:3207–3214. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.822791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Park KH, Jeong MH, Lee KH, et al. Comparison of peri-procedural platelet inhibition with prasugrel versus adjunctive cilostazol to dual anti-platelet therapy in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2014;63:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.American College of Emergency Physicians 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78–e140. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang JH, Hahn JY, Song YB, et al. Association of beta-blocker therapy at discharge with clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:592–601. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Steg PG, James SK, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–2619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127:e362–e425. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jeong HC, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Comparative assessment of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: surmountable vs. insurmountable antagonist. Int J Cardiol. 2014;170:291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Park H, Kim HK, Jeong MH, et al. Clinical impacts of inhibition of renin-angiotensin system in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent successful late percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiol. 2017;69:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1495–1504. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285:1711–1718. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.13.1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee KH, Jeong MH, Kim HM, et al. Benefit of early statin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction who have extremely low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1664–1671. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sim DS, Jeong MH, Cho KH, et al. Effect of early statin treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J. 2013;43:100–109. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2013.43.2.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Piao ZH, Jeong MH, Li Y, et al. Benefit of statin therapy in patients with coronary spasm-induced acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2016;68:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ji MS, Jeong MH, Ahn YK, et al. Clinical outcome of statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction propensity-score matching analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;225:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim HK, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. A new risk score system for the assessment of clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2010;145:450–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim HK, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al. Hospital discharge risk score system for the assessment of clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry [KAMIR] score) Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:965–971.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jeong YW, Jeong MH, Kim SS, et al. CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system as an initial method for screening high-risk patients in acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2014;174:777–780. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kim HK, Jeong MH, Seo HW, et al. Clinical impacts of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein reduction for secondary prevention in Asian patients with one-year survivor after acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2015;193:20–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lee JH, Bae MH, Yang DH, et al. Prognostic value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score for 1-year mortality in 30-day survivors who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:1167–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Park DW, Clare RM, Schulte PJ, et al. Extent, location, and clinical significance of non-infarct-related coronary artery disease among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2014;312:2019–2027. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Korean Circulation Journal are provided here courtesy of The Korean Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES