Favipiravir (T-705), a broad spectrum inhibitor of viral RNA polymerase

Abstract

Favipiravir (T-705; 6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide) is an anti-viral agent that selectively and potently inhibits the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of RNA viruses. Favipiravir was discovered through screening chemical library for anti-viral activity against the influenza virus by Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd. Favipiravir undergoes an intracellular phosphoribosylation to be an active form, favipiravir-RTP (favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5′-triphosphate), which is recognized as a substrate by RdRp, and inhibits the RNA polymerase activity. Since the catalytic domain of RdRp is conserved among various types of RNA viruses, this mechanism of action underpins a broader spectrum of anti-viral activities of favipiravir. Favipiravir is effective against a wide range of types and subtypes of influenza viruses, including strains resistant to existing anti-influenza drugs. Of note is that favipiravir shows anti-viral activities against other RNA viruses such as arenaviruses, bunyaviruses and filoviruses, all of which are known to cause fatal hemorrhagic fever. These unique anti-viral profiles will make favipiravir a potentially promising drug for specifically untreatable RNA viral infections.

1. Introduction

Significant progress has been made in anti-infection therapies since the middle of the 20th century with the advent of antibiotics, vaccines and other anti-microbial agents. Mainstay of anti-viral therapy has been preventive vaccines and therapeutic anti-viral agents, which are, however, efficacious for a certain type of viruses. There are still emerging or re-emerging viral infections, to which effective drug or vaccine therapies are not available. Resistance to existing anti-viral drugs has become a serious problem.

Influenza is one of the most prevalent infections caused by influenza virus, and epidemic every year in the world. Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus A(H5N1) in humans was identified in Hong Kong in 1997 and continuously causes outbreaks.¹⁾ Avian influenza A(H7N9) in 2013 in China,²⁾ and pandemic influenza A(H1N1) in 2009 which caused 17,700 deaths in 2009, are of public health concern.³⁾ Epidemic of A(H1N1) influenza virus resistant to oseltamivir, a neuraminidase (NA) inhibitor, occurred in the 2008 to 2009 season⁴⁾ and amantadine, an M2 protein inhibitor, showed a high rate of resistance after administration. Due to limited diversity of the mechanism of action of currently available anti-influenza agents, there is a strong need to discover an anti-influenza drug with a novel mechanism of action.

Recently, viruses mediated by arthropod or wild animals are spreading in the world. Outbreaks of Ebola and Lassa viruses in Western Africa in 2014 raised a social concern over prevention and therapy if they occur.^5,6) These viruses are highly pathogenic and cause fatal infections.^5,7)

Favipiravir (Fig. 1) was discovered by chemical modification of a pyrazine analog initially screened by in vitro anti-influenza virus activity in cells. Favipiravir is a selective and potent inhibitor of influenza viral RNA polymerase,⁸⁾ and effective against all subtypes and strains of influenza viruses including ones sensitive or resistant to marketed neuraminidase and M2 inhibitors. Favipiravir demonstrated anti-viral activities against other RNA viruses.⁹⁾ These data clearly suggest that favipiravir is a promising drug for the treatment of infections by not only influenza virus but also a wide range of RNA viruses. On the other hand, favipiravir has a risk for teratogenicity and embryotoxicity. Therefore, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare granted conditional marketing approval with strict regulations for its production and clinical use.¹⁰⁾

Figure 1.

Chemical structure of favipiravir (T-705).

In this review, we will describe the mechanisms of action of favipiravir, a broad spectrum of anti-viral activities in vitro, and therapeutic potential in animal infection models of a wide range of RNA viruses.

2. Mechanisms of action of favipiravir

Favipiravir inhibited the replication of viral genome, which was the most manifested in the middle of viral proliferation cycle in a time-of-drug-addition test.⁸⁾ Anti-viral activity of favipiravir was attenuated in the presence of purine nucleosides or purine bases, indicating competition of favipiravir with purine nucleosides rather than pyrimidine nucleosides.⁸⁾ Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells are well used as an in vitro assay of influenza virus. MDCK cells were treated with favipiravir, and cellular metabolites were analyzed by HPLC. Favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5′-triphosphate (favipiravir-RTP), favipiravir ribofuranose (favipiravir-R) and favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5′-monophosphate (favipiravir-RMP) were detected.⁸⁾ These results suggest that the activation of favipiravir takes place once it is incorporated into cells. Favipiravir-RTP was chemically synthesized and was tested for the inhibition of RNA polymerase activity of influenza virus as assessed by incorporation of ³²P-GTP. Favipiravir-RTP inhibited the viral RNA polymerase activity in concentrations ranging from nanomolar to micromolar.⁸⁾ None of favipiravir and favipiravir-RMP affected influenza RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) at 100 µmol/L (Fig. 2). These results indicate that favipiravir exerts its anti-viral activity as a pro-drug, since favipiravir is intra-cellularly phosphoribosylated to be an active form, favipiravir-RTP, which inhibits the viral replication by interacting with viral RNA polymerase.⁸⁾

Figure 2.

Effects of favipiravir-RTP, favipiravir and favipiravir-RMP on RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) activity of Influenza virus (Based on Furuta et al., 2005⁸⁾). RdRp activity was assessed by incorporation of ³²P-GTP into a nascent RNA strand. Results are means ± standard deviations (n = 3). *, P < 0.01; results significantly different from those for the controls by the Tukey test.

The mechanism of the interaction of favipiravir-RTP with RdRp molecule has not been fully elucidated. It is hypothesized that favipiravir may be misincorporated in a nascent viral RNA, or it may act by binding to conserved polymerase domains, thus preventing incorporation of nucleotides for viral RNA replication and transcription. It was recently demonstrated that favipiravir induced lethal mutagenesis during influenza virus infection, and reduced viral titer either at a low (0.0001 PFU/cell) or high (10 PFU/cell) multiplicity of infection in vitro. Sequence analysis of various nucleoprotein (NP) clones revealed an increase in the number of detectable G→A and C→T or C→U transition mutations, along with an increased mutation frequency, and a concomitant shift in the nucleotide profiles of the NP gene analyzed from various clones.^11,13) It is important to note that no viable favipiravir resistant mutants were isolated in these studies.^9,11–14) Previous studies suggest that favipiravir has virucidal effects, implicating the mutagenesis by favipiravir may be engaged in various types of RNA viruses.

We undertook a primer extension assay using influenza H1N1 extracts as sources for RdRp and template viral RNAs. Addition of 5′Cap1 RNA to the assay mixture made cap-snatching and transcription take place. In the presence of favipiravir-RTP, a single molecule of favipiravir-RTP was incorporated into the nascent RNA, and the strand extension was blocked (Fig. 3).¹⁵⁾ Jin et al.¹⁶⁾ used synthetic RNA templates designed to form the panhandle structure, and recombinant PA/PB1/PB2 complex as RdRp. They demonstrated that favipiravir-RTP was efficiently incorporated into a nascent RNA strand, the incorporation of single molecule of favipiravir-RTP partially prevented the extension of RNA strand, and double incorporation of favipiravir-RTP molecules completely blocked the further extension. These two studies indicate that favipiravir-RTP efficiently inhibits the extension of viral RNA strand, once incorporated into a viral RNA strand.

Figure 3.

Incorporation of favipiravir-RTP and GTP into a nascent RNA strand, and inhibition of influenza virus RdRp (Based on Sangawa et al., 2013¹⁵⁾). (A) Incorporation of favipiravir-RTP and GTP at the position of G11+2. The ³²P-labeled pGEM-7zf (+) DNA run-off transcript with a 5′Cap1 structure (Cap1-pGEM-mRNA), crude influenza virus RdRp containing a viral genome, and nucleotides including favipiravir-RTP were incubated. Reaction products were then electrophoresed. Lane 1–5: Cap1-pGEM-mRNA and crude enzyme solution + 50 µmol/L CTP; Lane 2, 3: Conditions of lane 1 + 100 and 1,000 µmol/L GTP; Lane 4, 5: Conditions of lane 2 + 100 and 1,000 µmol/L favipiravir-RTP. (B) Inhibition of influenza virus RdRp by favipiravir-RTP. The ³²P-labeled pGEM-7zf (+) DNA run-off transcript with a 5′Cap1 structure (Cap1-pGEM-mRNA), crude influenza virus RdRp containing a viral genome, and nucleotides including favipiravir-RTP were incubated. Reaction products were then electrophoresed. Lane 1: Cap1-pGEM-mRNA; Lane 2–6: Cap1-pGEM-mRNA + crude enzyme solution; Lane 3–6: Conditions of lane 2 + 50 µmol/L CTP, 100 µmol/L ATP, 50 µmol/L GTP; Lanes 4–6: Conditions of lane 3 + 10, 100, and 1,000 µmol/L favipiravir-RTP. * Elongated RNA was detected when GTP, ATP, and CTP were added to the reaction mixture.

Ribavirin is a guanosine analog, and has anti-viral activity against a wide range of RNA viruses. Ribavirin undergoes phosphorylation in cells to generate ribavirin monophosphate (ribavirin-MP), and further its triphosphate form. Although multiple mechanisms of action of ribavirin are documented,¹⁷⁾ the best known is inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) by ribavirin-MP, leading to reduced GTP levels.¹⁸⁾ The inhibition of IMPDH was compared between favipiravir-RMP and ribavirin-MP, whose 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values were 601 and 3.9 µmol/L, respectively.⁸⁾ The concentration of GTP in MDCK cells treated with ribavirin-MP was much lower than that with favipiravir-RMP.¹⁹⁾ These data suggest unlikely that IMPDH is the target for favipiravir.

Nucleic acid synthesis is essential for life in viruses and humans. Unlike RNA virus, humans do not have RdRp, but have DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (DdRp) and DNA-dependent DNA polymerase. Favipiravir-RTP was tested for the inhibition of those polymerase activities.²⁰⁾ Favipiravir-RTP inhibited influenza RdRp with an IC₅₀ of 0.341 µmol/L, but did not human DNA polymerases α, β, γ at up to 1000 µmol/L. Favipiravir slightly inhibited human RNA polymerase II, which belongs to DdRp, with an IC₅₀ of 905 µmol/L.⁹⁾ These results are consistent with evidence that favipiravir did not inhibit DNA and RNA synthesis at 637 µmol/L in MDCK cells.⁸⁾

Schematic representation of intracellular activation and mechanism of actions of favipiravir is depicted based on findings of favipiravir obtained to date (Fig. 4). Once incorporated into host cells, favipiravir undergoes phosphoribosylation and further phosphorylation to become favipiravir-RTP, which blocks viral RdRp. This mechanism of action of favipiravir is quite unique, since marketed influenza drugs inhibit either entry or release of the virus. Selective inhibition of viral RdRp by favipiravir implicates a wider anti-viral spectrum. Further investigation is needed to clarify the correlation between anti-viral activity of RNA viruses by favipiravir and inhibition of their RdRp activities.

Figure 4.

Schematic representation of the activation mechanism of favipiravir (Based on Furuta et al., 2013⁹⁾). Favipiravir is incorporated into cells, and converted to favipiravir ribofuranosyl phosphates by host cell enzymes. The triphosphate form, favipiravir-RTP, inhibits the influenza viral RNA polymerase activity.

3. Anti-viral activities of favipiravir

It was demonstrated that favipiravir inhibited proliferation of RNA viruses but not of DNA viruses.²¹⁾ In vitro anti-viral activities of favipiravir cited from published studies are enlisted in Table 1.

Table 1.

In vitro anti-viral activities of favipiravir

Group	Family	Virus	EC50 (µg/mL)	Reference
RNA (−) strand	Orthomyxoviridae	Influenza A (seasonal)	0.01–0.94	Furuta, Y. et al. 200221) Sleeman, K. et al. 201022)
		Influenza A (H5N1)	0.2–1.9	Sidwell, R.W. et al. 200725) Sleeman, K. et al. 201022)
		Influenza A (H1N1)pdm09	0.13–3.53	Sleeman, K. et al. 201022)
		Influenza A (H7N9)	1.4	Watanabe, T. et al. 201361)
		Influenza B	0.04–0.8	Furuta, Y. et al. 200221) Sleeman, K. et al. 201022)
		Influenza C	0.03–0.06	Furuta, Y. et al. 200221)
	Bunyaviridae	La Crosse	5	Gowen, B.B. et al. 200729)
		Punta Toro	8.6–30	Gowen, B.B. et al. 2007, 201029,34)
		Rift Valley fever	4.2–5.0	Gowen, B.B. et al. 2007, 201029,34)
		Sandfly fever	4.7–18	Gowen, B.B. et al. 2007, 201029,34)
		Dobrava	15	Buys, K.K. et al. 201135)
		Maporal	10	Buys, K.K. et al. 201135)
		Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever	1.1	Oestereich, L. et al. 201436)
		Prospect Hill	10	Buys, K.K. et al. 201135)
		Severe fever thrombocytopenia syndrome	0.71–1.3	Tani, H. et al. 201641)
	Arenaviridae	Junin	0.8–3.0	Gowen, B.B. et al. 2007, 201029,34) Mendenhall, M. et al. 201131)
		Pichinde	0.9–3.9	Gowen, B.B. et al. 2007, 201029,34)
		Tacaribe	0.9–4.1	Gowen, B.B. et al. 2007, 201029,34)
		Guanarito	2.4	Mendenhall, M. et al. 201131)
		Machupo	2.2	Mendenhall, M. et al. 201131)
		Lassa	1.7–11.1 (EC90)	Safronetz, D. et al. 201532) Oestereich, L. et al. 201633)
	Filoviridae	Ebola	10.5	Oestereich, L. et al. 201453) Smither, S.J. et al. 201454)
	Rhabdoviridae	Rabies	5.1–7.0	Yamada, K. et al. 201658)
	Paramyxoviridae	Human metapneumovirus	1.3–6.3 (EC90)	Jochmans, D. et al. 201660)
		Respiratory syncytial virus	41	Furuta, Y. et al. 200221)
RNA (+) strand	Flaviviridae	West Nile	53	Morrey, J.D. et al. 200844)
		Yellow fever	42	Julander, J.G. et al. 200943)
		Zika virus	3.5–3.8	Zmurko J. et al. 201645)
	Togaviridae	Western equine encephalitis	1.2, 49 (EC90)	Delang, L. et al. 201447) Julander, J.G. et al. 200946)
		Venezuelan equine encephalitis	1.7	Delang, L. et al. 201447)
		Eastern equine encephalitis	2.8	Delang, L. et al. 201447)
		Barmah forest	2.8	Delang, L. et al. 201447)
		Ross river	0.5	Delang, L. et al. 201447)
		Mayaro	2.5	Delang, L. et.al. 201447)
		Chikungunya	0.3–9.4	Delang, L. et al. 201447)
	Picornaviridae	Polio	4.8	Furuta, Y. et al. 200221)
		Rhino	23	Furuta, Y. et al. 200221)
		Enterovirus 71	23	Wang, Y. et al. 201650)
	Caliciviridae	Noro	19–39	Rocha-pereira, J. et al. 201251)

3.1. Effects on influenza virus.

Favipiravir demonstrated anti-viral activities against all subtypes of influenza virus strains, including type A, B and C in studies using laboratory strains of influenza virus with 50% effective concentration (EC₅₀) values ranging from 0.014 to 0.55 µg/mL.²¹⁾ Favipiravir was evaluated in vitro for the ability to block the proliferation of representative influenza viruses, including seasonable strains A(H1N1), A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B; highly pathogenic avian influenza virus A(H5N1) isolated from human. These strains contain ones resistant to oseltamivir or zanamivir, and several ones resistant to both NA inhibitors. It is noted that favipiravir demonstrated anti-viral activities against all strains tested (Fig. 5).²²⁾ Favipiravir was not cytotoxic for MDCK cells with 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC₅₀) of >1000 µg/mL, demonstrating a high antiviral index.²¹⁾

Figure 5.

Influenza virus susceptibility testing to favipiravir in plaque reduction assay in MDCK cells (Based on Sleeman et al., 2010²²⁾). Influenza viruses were included seasonable strains A(H1N1), A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B; highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) isolated from human. These strains contain ones resistant to oseltamivir or zanamivir, and several ones resistant to both NA inhibitors. Changes to NA were detected by surveillance criteria (Sheu et al., 2008⁵⁹⁾). EC₅₀, 50% effective concentration. ○; NA inhibitor sensitive, ●; Oseltamivir resistant, ▲; Oseltamivir and Zamanivir resistant.

3.2. Efficacy of favipiravir in vivo.

Favipiravir was assessed in murine models of influenza virus infection (Fig. 6). Mice were infected with a lethal dose of influenza virus either of H3N2 (A/Victoria/3/75), H3N2 (A/Osaka/5/70) or H5N1 (A/Duck/MN/1525/81). Favipiravir was orally administered 1 hr post-infection. Survival rate was significantly improved in mice dosed with favipiravir at more than 30 mg/kg/day, regardless of twice a day (b.i.d.) or four times a day, whereas none of mice survived in the control group.⁹⁾

Figure 6.

Therapeutic effects of favipiravir in the mice infection model (Based on Furuta et al., 2013⁹⁾). Ten female Balb/c mice were infected with 100% lethal dose of influenza virus either of A/Victoria/3/75 (H3N2), A/Osaka/5/70 (H3N2) or A/Duck/MN/1525/81 (H5N1) and monitored for survival to day 21. Favipiravir was orally administered 1 hr post-infection twice (Osaka, Duck) or four times (Victoria) a day for 5 days. **, p < 0.001 compared to control group (Yates-corrected Chi-square test). ++, p < 0.001 compared to control group (Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test.

The effect of favipiravir on the viral load was investigated in mice infected with influenza virus H1N1 (A/California/04/09). Oral treatment with favipiravir at 60 and 300 mg/kg/day decreased the viral load in the lung 3 and 6 days post-infection. Favipiravir demonstrated anti-viral efficacy equal to or more potent than oseltamivir and zanamivir in the murine infection model with influenza virus A(H1N1)pdm09.²³⁾ Furthermore, favipiravir was significantly more efficacious than oseltamivir in the murine infection models with the virus challenge of 100 times higher titer with influenza viruses A/PR/8 (H1N1), or of delayed dosing (up to 96 hrs post-infection) in A/Duck/MN/1525/81 (H5N1) infectious murine model.^24,25)

Combination of anti-viral agents with a different mechanism of action is utilized to enhance therapeutic effects or to reduce the emergence of resistant virus clones. Synergistic effects were demonstrated by the combination of favipiravir with oseltamivir in a murine model of influenza virus.²⁶⁾ Combination of favipiravir and oseltamivir significantly improved the survival rate of mice infected with influenza virus A/Victoria/3/75 (H3N2), while either of single agent alone showed limited effects. Similar combination effects were demonstrated in mice infected with influenza viruses A/NWS/33 (H1N1) or A/Duck/MN/1525/81 (H5N1). These results provide us with wider therapeutic options for the treatment for epidemic influenza virus resistant to existing anti-influenza agents or for severe patients.

4. Efficacy of favipiarvir in other viruses

Favipiravir has the characteristic of acting specifically on RNA viruses.²¹⁾ Among infections by RNA viruses, arena-, bunya-, flavi- and filoviruses cause hemorrhagic fever and/or encephalitis with high case fatality rate. Neither vaccines nor approved anti-viral agents are available for those viral infections, underscoring urgent needs for effective broad spectrum anti-viral agents. Ribavirin is the only drug effective for arenaviral hemorrhagic fever, and used off-label. Its therapeutic effects are based on the comparison with historical data.²⁷⁾

The next section is the review on the efficacy of favipiravir for hemorrhagic fever viruses and related ones, including picorna-, noro- and rabies virus.

4.1. Arenaviridae.

Many of arenaviruses are known to cause severe diseases in human.²⁸⁾ No agents are approved for the treatment of arenavirus infections besides ribavirin with toxicity concerns. In vitro activity of favipiravir against pathogenic arenaviruses was compared with ribavirin. EC₅₀ values of favipiravir in cytopathic effect (CPE) assay using Vero cells were 0.79–0.94 µg/mL for Junin virus, Pichinde virus (PICV) and Tacaribe virus. In the virus yield reduction assay with Vero cells on days 3 and 5 post-infection, the 90% effective concentration (EC₉₀) values against Lassa virus (LASV) were 1.7 and 11.1 µg/mL, respectively.³²⁾ In addition, favipiravir showed higher selectivity for tested viruses than ribavirin (Table 2).

Table 2.

In vitro inhibitory effects of favipiravir and ribavirin against Arenaviruses (Based on Gowen et al., 2007²⁹⁾)

Virusa	strain	Favipiravirb			Ribavirinb
		CC50	EC50	SI	CC50	EC50	SI
JUNV	Candid 1	188	0.79	239	51	2.7	19
PICV	An 4763	175	0.94	186	38	3.2	12
TCRV	TRVL 11573	214	0.94	227	68	2.4	28

^aJUNV, Junin virus; PICV, Pichinde virus; TCRV, Tacaribe virus.

^b50% cytotoxic concentration (CC₅₀) and 50% effective concentration (EC₅₀) values are in µg/mL for JUNV, PICV and TCRV determined by CPE reduction assays using Vero cells, and SI (selectivity index) is calculated as CC₅₀/EC₅₀.

In the PICV infected hamster model, oral treatment with favipiravir suppressed deaths, reduced viral loads in the blood and tissues, and blocked the damage in the liver at 60 mg/kg/day b.i.d. for 7 days beginning 4 hr post-infection.²⁹⁾ Administration of favipiravir 4–6 days post-infection significantly increased the survival rate (P < 0.001) at 100 mg/kg/day b.i.d. for 7 days in the PICV infected hamster model.³⁰⁾ In a guinea pig model of PICV infection, therapeutic effects of oral favipiravir were demonstrated, even after symptoms emerged.³¹⁾

It was recently reported that oral favipiravir was efficacious in the guinea pig and mouse infection models of LASV.^32,33) Therapeutic effects were shown by favipiravir, when dosing commenced 2 days post-infection with LASV (Fig. 7A). Subcutaneous treatment of favipiravir at 300 mg/kg/day once a day decreased fever, blocked loss of body weight and increased the survival rate in infected guinea pigs. These effects were more manifested than those achieved by ribavirin at 50 mg/kg/day. Favipiravir improved the survival rate of guinea pigs infected with LASV, even when the treatment was initiated 5, 7 and 9 days post-infection (Fig. 7B).³²⁾

Figure 7.

Treatment of lethal Lassa virus infection in guinea pigs with favipiravir (Based on Safronetz D et al. 2015³²⁾). (A) Treatment began 48 hours after challenge. Groups of nine guinea pigs were challenged with a lethal dose of guinea pig adapted–Lassa virus (GPA-LASV) and treated subcutaneously once daily for two weeks with favipiravir (150 or 300 mg/kg/day), ribavirin (50 mg/kg/day) or vehicle placebo. (B) Groups of six guinea pigs were challenged with a lethal dose of GPA-LASV. Beginning on days 5, 7, and 9 post-challenge, favipiravir treatment (300 mg/kg/day, once daily subcutaneously for 14 consecutive days) was initiated in the respective group of animals. Each study followed survival for up to 42 days post-infection. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to placebo; a; p < 0.05 and b; p < 0.001 compared to ribavirin.

4.2. Bunyaviridae.

La Crosse virus (LACV), Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV), Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) and hantavirus are in the family of Bunyaviridae, and cause severe diseases such as hemorrhagic fever, fever with thrombocytopenia, and fever with renal or pulmonary syndromes. In in vitro study, favipiravir demonstrated more potent and selective anti-viral activities against these viruses in Vero cells than ribavirin (Table 3).^34,35,41) EC₅₀ values were 0.9–30 µg/mL for LACV, Punta Toro virus (PTV), RVFV, Sandfly fever virus, SFTSV and Dobrava, Maporal and Prospect Hill Hantaviruses in the assays of CPE or focus forming unit (FFU) reduction.

Table 3.

In vitro inhibitory effects of favipiravir and ribavirin against Bunyaviruses (Based on Gowen et al., 2007,²⁹⁾ Buys et al., 2011³⁵⁾ and Tani et al., 2016⁴¹⁾)

Virusa	strain	Favipiravirb			Ribavirinb
		CC50	EC50	SI	CC50	EC50	SI
LACV	—	>1000	5.0	>199	877	17	51
PTV	Adames	>1000	30	>33	898	42	21
RVFV	MP-12	>980	5.0	>196	>906	13	>70
SFNV	Naples	>1000	18	>55	>729	22	>33
DOBV	Sotkamo	757	15	52	296	18	17
MPRLV	HV9021050	753	10	74	256	11	22
PHV	MP40	600	10	58	248	5.6	44
SFTSV	SPL010	>157	0.9	>167	>157	7.7	>20

^aLACV; La Crosse virus, PTV; Punta Toro virus, RVFV; The Rift Valley fever virus, SFNV; Sandfly fever virus, DOBV; Dobrava virus, MPRLV; Maporal virus, PHV; Prospect Hill virus UNV, SFTSV; Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome virus.

^b50% cytotoxic concentration (CC₅₀) and 50% effective concentration (EC₅₀) values are in µg/ml as determined by CPE reduction assays using Vero cells, and SI (selectivity index) is calculated as CC₅₀/EC₅₀.

Oral treatment with favipiravir b.i.d. blocked the lethality, reduced viral loads in the blood and the tissues, and suppressed hepatic lesions in the infection models of PTV in mice and hamsters.^29,34) Oral treatment with favipiravir b.i.d. improved the survival rates in mice infected with CCHFV, when the dosing commenced 2 days post-infection.³⁶⁾ In hamsters infected with RVFV, oral favipiravir b.i.d. blocked deaths, and decreased viral titer in the serum and in the tissues.³⁷⁾

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging viral disease caused by SFTSV, which has recently been identified in China, Korea and Japan.^38–40) Seasonality of SFTSV is throughout the year, but more common between spring to autumn. Favipiravir inhibited the replication of SFTSV with EC₅₀ values of 0.71–1.3 µg/mL in FFU reduction assays using Vero cells.⁴¹⁾ Therapeutic effects of favipiravir was demonstrated in SFTSV infection model in mice lacking interferon alpha receptors (IFNAR^−/−). Oral treatment with favipiravir survived all mice (P < 0.001) at 300 mg/kg once a day for 5 days initiating 3 days post-infection, whereas initiating 4 and 5 days post-infection significantly increased survival rates (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) over the placebo group (Table 4). Upon these pre-clinical study results, clinical research on SFTS has commenced in Japan.⁴²⁾

Table 4.

Therapeutic effects of favipiravir in the SFTSV infected IFNAR^−/− mice model (Based on Tani et al., 2016⁴¹⁾)

Group	Treatment	Treatment period	Survival rate survivor/total	Maximum body weight change (%) mean ± SD
Control	vehicle	day 0–4	1/10	77.3 ± 8.9
Favipiravir	300 mg/kg/day	day 1–5	6/6***	97.9 ± 4.7
		day 2–6	6/6***	88.3 ± 5.1
		day 3–7	6/6***	83.3 ± 2.2
		day 4–8	5/6**	80.2 ± 4.6
		day 5–9	3/6*	75.5 ± 4.9

Six or 10 IFNAR^−/− male mice in each group were inoculated subcutaneously with 1.0 × 10⁶ TCID₅₀ of SFTSV (SPL010 strain). Mice were treated with favipiravir at a dose of 300 mg/kg/day. Treatment was commenced 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 days post-infection. Favipiravir was administered once daily until death or for 5 days. Survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and GraphPad Prism6. Significance was determined relative to results for the placebo group: ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05. Relative weight is shown as means with standard deviations (Tani et al., 2016⁴¹⁾).

4.3. Flaviviridae.

Favipiravir inhibited the replication of several pathogenic flaviviruses, including yellow fever virus (YFV) and West Nile virus (WNV).^43,44) Higher concentrations of favipiravir were needed to achieve the same efficacy for flavivirus as for influenza virus. The EC₉₀ of favipiravir for YFV was 51.8 µg/mL in a yield-reduction assay using Vero cells.⁴³⁾ In YFV-infected hamsters, oral treatment with favipiravir at 200 or 400 mg/kg/day for 8 days significantly decreased fatality rate when the treatment was initiated 4 hr before infection.⁴³⁾ Complete protection was achieved when oral treatment with favipiravir at 400 mg/kg/day was initiated within 2 days post-infection.

In vitro and in vivo anti-viral efficacy of favipiravir was demonstrated for WNV.⁴⁴⁾ Favipiravir inhibited the proliferation of WNV with an EC₅₀ of 53 µg/mL in Vero cells. In WNV infected mice, oral administration of favipiravir at 400 mg/kg/day b.i.d. initiating 4 hr subcutaneous infection protected nine out of ten mice from mortality (p < 0.01), and reduced the expression of viral proteins and RNA in brain tissues on 6 days post-infection. Similar efficacy was demonstrated in the second species. Hamsters were orally dosed at 400 mg/kg/day b.i.d. commencing 4 hr after subcutaneous infection. Like mice, favipiravir significantly improved the survival rate (p < 0.01). It is of note that envelope protein of WNV was not detected in the brains of hamsters dosed with favipiravir when examined on day 7 post-infection.

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an emerging arbovirus of Flaviviridae, which is mainly transmitted by mosquito bites. Evidence to date suggests the association between fetal infection and microcephaly. Favipiravir inhibited the replication of ZIKV in Vero cells with an EC₅₀ of 3.5–3.8 µg/mL, suggesting a therapeutic potential for the ZIKV infection.⁴⁵⁾

4.4. Togaviridae.

Favipiravir showed anti-viral activity against Western equine encephalitis virus (WEEV) cultured in Vero cells with an EC₉₀ of 49 µg/mL.⁴⁶⁾ In WEEV infected mice, oral treatment with favipiravir significantly improved the survival rate (p < 0.01) and prolonged time to death at 400 mg/kg/day b.i.d. for 7 days initiating 4 hr before infection. Viral titer in the brain on day 4 post-infection decreased to one tenth although with no statistical significance. Signs of disease were relatively modest, which was not eliminated by favipiravir.

Favipiravir demonstrated anti-viral activity against Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) in Vero cells with an EC₅₀ of 0.3–9.4 µg/mL. In CHIKV infected mice, oral administration of favipiravir improved the survival rate at 300 mg/kg/day b.i.d. initiating 24 hr before or 4 hr post-infection.⁴⁷⁾

4.5. Picornaviridae.

Replication of foot-and-mouth disease virus was inhibited by favipiravir in vitro with an EC₅₀ of 14 µg/mL.^48,49) Favipiravir blocked the replication of poliovirus in Vero cells and rhinovirus in HeLa cells with EC₅₀s of 4.8 and 23 µg/mL, and with selectivity index of 29 and >43, respectively.²¹⁾ Replication of Enterovirus was inhibited by favipiravir with an EC₅₀ of 23 µg/mL.⁵⁰⁾

4.6. Caliciviridae.

Favipiravir was active against murine norovirus with an EC₅₀ of 39 µg/mL in CPE assay using murine leukaemia macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. Real-time PCR revealed that favipiravir inhibited viral RNA synthesis with an EC₅₀ of 19 µg/mL.⁵¹⁾ In persistent norovirus infected murine model, oral treatment with favipiravir significantly decreased viral titer in feces and the ratio of norovirus antigen positive mice at 600 mg/kg/day b.i.d. for 8 weeks beginning 4 weeks post-infection.¹⁴⁾ It was demonstrated that favipiravir-RTP inhibited RNA polymerase activity of human Norovirus.⁵²⁾

4.7. Filoviridae.

Favipiravir demonstrated anti-viral activity against Zaire Ebola virus (Mayinga 1976 strain) in Vero E6 cells with an EC₅₀ of 10.5 µg/mL. In IFNAR^−/− C57BL/6 mice infected with Mayinga 1976 strain, oral treatment with favipiravir protected all mice from deaths and decreased viral titer in the blood at 300 mg/kg/day b.i.d. for 8 days beginning 6 days post-infection, while all mice died in the placebo group.⁵³⁾ Similarly, in IFNAR^−/− A129 mice infected with E718 strain, oral treatment with favipiravir completely protected infected mice from deaths at 300 mg/kg/day b.i.d. for 14 days beginning 1 hr post-infection.⁵⁴⁾

Outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) occurred in western Africa in 2014. French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and Guinea Government carried out clinical study with favipiravir (JIKI study).⁵⁵⁾ Favipiravir was well tolerated, and demonstrated a trend to decrease the mortality of patients with the low viral load (cycle threshold < 20).⁵⁶⁾ Chinese group recently reported that favipiravir increased the survival rate with statistical significance (p < 0.05), and decreased the viral load in the patients with EVD in Sierra Leone.⁵⁷⁾

4.8. Rhabdoviridae.

It has recently been reported that favipiravir was active against rabies virus (RABV) in murine neuroblastoma Neuro-2a cells with EC₅₀s of 5.1–7.0 µg/mL.⁵⁸⁾ Favipiravir significantly improved the morbidity and mortality of mice infected with RABV, when oral administration at 300 mg/kg/day b.i.d. for 7 days was initiated 1 hr post-infection. Favipiravir showed no effects when administered after symptoms appeared.

These results suggest that favipiravir has a wide range of anti-viral spectrum among RNA viruses, and matches the medical needs for those specifically untreatable viral infections. Interferon α and ribavirin are possible drugs to use with wide anti-viral spectrum; however, debilitating side effects limit their use. Unlike these agents, favipiravir was well tolerated in clinical studies.

5. Conclusion

Favipiravir was discovered by phenotypic screening against influenza virus at Research Laboratories of Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd. We undertook further studies to investigate the mechanism of actions, and anti-viral effects against various types of viruses. Favipiravir is phosphoribosylated in the cells to be an active form, favipiravir-RTP, which is recognized as a purine nucleotide by RdRp, and inhibits the RdRp enzyme activity. Favipiravir-RTP exhibits no effects on DNA-dependent RNA or DNA polymerases. These characters explain that favipiravir favors RNA virus over DNA virus and mammalian cells. Favipiravir is efficacious in multiple types of Influenza viruses, regardless of sensitive or resistant to existing anti-influenza drugs. Of specific note is that favipiravir is active against a wide range of other RNA viruses in vitro and in vivo. In vitro studies indicate no emergence of resistance to favipiravir.

Favipiravir is currently approved for influenza infection in Japan, and at an advanced clinical development in US. Evidence to date from clinical studies shows that favipiravir is well tolerated in human. Wider anti-viral spectrum of favipiravir drove us to pursue clinical research for devastating virus infections such as Ebola and SFTS. We strongly believe that favipiavir with these unique profiles will be a promising therapeutic agent for unremedied infections by RNA viruses in the near future.

Biographies

Profile

Yousuke Furuta was born in Gifu Prefecture in 1956. After receiving BS in Pharmacology from Kitasato University in Japan, he found a job as a researcher at Zenyaku Kogyo Company, Limited in Tokyo, Japan. He switched to Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd. in Toyama, Japan. In the following years, he developed his experience in pharmacology of cancer and virus through temporary transfer to Cancer Institute (HTLV, HIV) and Kitasato University (antiviral screening methods, infectious immunology). Based on the experience, he led a Toyama’s antiviral research team and invented Favipiravir (T-705), viral RNA polymerase inhibitor to influenza virus and T-1105, anti-FMDV agent. For these achievements, he obtained Ph.D. in Bioscience in Kitasato University.

Yousuke Furuta is a Senior Associate of Business Development Department at Toyama Chemical in Japan.

Takashi Komeno was born (1981) and grew up in Takaoka-city of Toyama Prefecture, Japan. He entered the Tokyo University of Science and received a MS degree from the Tokyo University of Science in 2005, he joined Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd. in Toyama, Japan as a researcher in pharmacology of bacteria and virus. He has engaged in development research of Favipiravir (T-705) since 2006. He is being transferred to Fujifilm since 2016.

Takashi Komeno is a researcher of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare research Laboratories at Fujifilm in Japan.

Takaaki Nakamura was born (1957) and grew up in Aichi Prefecture, Japan. After obtaining a BS degree from the University of Tokyo in 1981, he joined Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company (currently Astellas) as a scientist in drug metabolism and cancer pharmacology in 1981. He moved to the research site at Pfizer in Japan in 1989, then to Fujifilm in 2008. In both companies his research centered on pharmacology in immunology, gastroenterology and cancer. He was transferred to Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd. in 2011. While working as a pharmacologist, he received a Ph.D. degree in Medical Sciences from the University of Osaka in 1988.

Takaaki Nakamura is currently Head of Research Laboratories and Leader of Inflammatory Field Project at Toyama Chemical in Japan.