Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Jan 4;56(6):1544–1548. doi: 10.1002/anie.201611332

Asymmetric Petasis Borono-Mannich Allylation Reactions Catalyzed by Chiral Biphenols

Yao Jiang 1, Scott E Schaus 1,
PMCID: PMC5716625  NIHMSID: NIHMS843137  PMID: 28052567

Abstract

Chiral biphenols catalyze the asymmetric Petasis borono–Mannich allylation of aldehydes and amines through the use of a bench-stable allyldioxaborolane. The reaction proceeds via a two-step, one-pot process and requires 2 – 8 mol% of 3,3’-Ph2-BINOL as the optimal catalyst. Under microwave heating the reaction affords chiral homoallylic amines in excellent yields (up to 99%) and high enantioselectivies (e.r. up to 99:1). The catalytic reaction is a true multicomponent condensation reaction whereas both the aldehyde and the amine can possess a wide range of structural and electronic properties. Use of crotyldioxaborolane in the reaction results in stereodivergent products with anti- and syn-diastereomers both in good diastereoselectivities and enantioselectivities from the corresponding E- and Z-borolane stereoisomers.

Keywords: enantioselective synthesis, organocatalysis, boronate, multicomponent reactions, imine allylation

COMMUNICATION

graphic file with name nihms843137u1.jpg

Aldehydes and amines are assembled with allylboronates in one-pot two-step procedure to provide chiral homoallyllic amines. The reaction is catalyzed by chiral biphenols to afford the products in high enantioselectivities.


The Petasis borono-Mannich reaction is a multicomponent condensation reaction of aldehydes, amines, and boronic acid nucleophiles.[1] The reaction products have proven useful as building blocks for synthesis in academic and industrial settings.[2] A specific subset of this reaction uses allyl boronates as nucleophiles. The corresponding chiral homoallylic amines are also valuable building blocks for the synthesis of biologically and pharmacologically active molecules.[3,4] Considerable efforts have been devoted to the development of a direct enantioselective allylation of imines.[514] In addition, we introduced the use of chiral biphenols as catalysts in the enantioselective allylboration of acyl imines.[15] However, the reaction did not leverage the most attractive nature of the Petasis–Borono-Mannich reaction, the multicomponent condensation giving rise to chiral amines that have different functionality at the aldehyde and amine component. We sought to develop a more general approach in performing the asymmetric allyl-Mannich reaction using amines and aldehydes in the imine formation step then performing the asymmetric allylboration reaction [Eq. (1)]. Herein, we report a highly enantioselective Petasis borono-Mannich reaction catalyzed by chiral biphenols in a one-pot procedure using aldehydes, amines, and allylboronates.

The challenge in performing an asymmetric allylation of imines is identifying a set of conditions that enable the use of amines and aldehydes that possess a wide range of steric and electronic properties; thereby maximizing the potential utility of the method. Notable asymmetric imine allylation methodologies use nitrogen protecting groups that can be removed subsequent to allylation such as acyl,[7] phosphinoyl,[8] sulfonyl,[9] and silyl[10] groups. Developing a reaction that would be highly enantioselective and yet general enough to permit the use of amines possessing different structural and electronic properties in the imine formation step is a significant challenge. Progress towards this goal include two notable examples of a three-component asymmetric imine allylation reaction employing in-situ generated imines. The condensation of aldehydes, 2-hydroxyaniline, and allyl tin reagents catalyzed by chiral scandium complexes in excellent enantioselectivities was reported in 2008.[16] In addition, List and co-workers used fluorenylmethyl carbamate, aldehydes, and allyl silane in a chiral acid catalyzed imine allylation achieving high enantioselectivities.[17] We sought to develop a methodology that would utilize the multicomponent strategy of the Petasis Borono-Mannich reaction, leveraging the ability to activate boronates for nucleophilic additions using chiral diols and biphenols developed by us[15,18] and others[19]. We envisioned a general method that was highly enantioselective irrespective of the imine used in the reaction.

graphic file with name nihms843137e1.jpg (1)

The reaction of benzaldehyde 1a with p-anisidine 2a was first evaluated as the aldehyde and amine component in the Petasis reaction. Performing a screen of chiral biphenol catalysts with the pure imine identified 3,3’-Ph2-BINOL catalyst 4 as the optimal catalyst (see Supporting Information for details); consistent to what was observed in the asymmetric allylborations of acyl imines.[15] Using on 2 mole % of the catalyst was enabled by the addition of t-BuOH as an additive to the neat reaction, an observation we made in the asymmetric allylboration of ketones.[18f] A one-pot procedure was subsequently developed. A mixture of benzaldehyde 1a and p-anisidine 2a in the presence of 3Å molecular sieves was stirred in dichloromethane at room temperature; after concentration, to the crude aldimine was added t-BuOH, 3,3’-Ph2-BINOL catalyst 4 and cyclic allyldioxaborolane 3. The reaction was then subjected to microwave irradiation conditions, 10 Watts achieving 50 °C, affording the allylation product amine 5a in 90% isolated yield and 97:3 enantiomeric ratio (e.r., Scheme 1). The observed enantioselectivity was consistent with the reaction of allyldioxaborolane with acyl imines.[15]

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Aldehyde substrate scope.[a] [a] Unless noted otherwise, all reactions were run in the following conditions: aldehyde (0.4 mmol), p-anisidine (0.8 mmol) and 3 Å molecular sieves (350 mg) were mixed in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) at room temperature for 2 h then concentrated in vacuo by rotary evaporation and high vacuum; then allylboronate (0.6 mmol), catalyst (0.012 mmol), t-BuOH (1.2 mmol) were added and submitted to the microwave reactor held at 10 W for 1 h. [b] Conventional heating at 50 °C for 24 h. [c] 4 mol% catalyst.

We examined the scope of the Petasis allylation reaction using p-anisidine as the amine with the objective of identifying the structural and electronic parameters of the aldehyde component that resulted in good yields and selectivities. In general, electron-deficient aromatic aldehydes produced excellent yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 1, 5b–5g). Electron-rich aromatic aldehydes were less reactive under the optimized conditions; however, better yields were obtained when higher catalyst loadings (4 mol%) and conventional heating for an extended period of time (5h–5i). Heteroaromatic aldehydes were also determined to be good substrates for the reaction (5k and 5l) as was 2-naphthaldehyde (5j). The general reaction conditions were also effective for aliphatic aldehydes.[20] Cyclohexane-carboxaldehyde afforded the homoallylic product 5p in excellent yield and enantioselectivity (93% yield, 99:1 e.r.). Notably, ethyl glyoxylate could be employed as an substrate, affording the chiral alpha-amino ester 5s in 70% yield and 97:3 e.r.[21,22] Branched aliphatic aldehydes isovaleraldehyde and pivaldehyde, while challenging substrates for other methods, were also excellent substrates, affording the products 3t and 3u in great enantioselectivities (>97:3 e.r.) and good yields (70 and 57% isolated yield respectively).

We next performed experiments to assess the use of amines possessing different electronic and steric properties in the multicomponent condensation reaction (Scheme 2). Cyclohexane carboxaldehyde was chosen as a representative aliphatic aldehyde and aryl amines were first evaluated. Substitution at the para-position with both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups resulted in similar yields and enantioselectivities (98:2 e.r., Scheme 2, 6a–6d). Substitution at the meta-position led to similar results in enantioselectivity (6e and 6f), and 2-bromoaniline afforded ortho-substituted homoallyl amine 6h in excellent enantiomeric purity (99:1 e.r.), demonstrating tolerance for substituents at the ortho positions. 2-Naphthylamine also proved to be an excellent substrate in the Petasis allylation reaction (6g). However, 2-amino pyridine afforded the desired product 6i in lower yield, even when conventional heating reaction conditions were employed, attributed to the coordinating ability of the pyridine nitrogen. However, the product was still isolated in 50% yield and 96:4 e.r.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Amine substrate scope.[a] [a] Unless noted otherwise, all reactions were run in the following conditions: aldehyde (0.4 mmol), amine (0.8 mmol) and 3Å molecular sieves (350 mg) were mixed in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) at room temperature for 2 h then concentrated in vacuo by rotary evaporation and high vacuum; then allylboronate (0.6 mmol), catalyst (0.012 mmol), t-BuOH (1.2 mmol) were added and submitted to the microwave reactor held at 10 W for 1 h. [b] Conventional heating at 50 °C for 24 h. [c] 4 mol% catalyst. [d] 0.4 mmol (1 equiv) amine. [e] 8 mol% catalyst.

Petasis condensation products of fluorinated and oxygenated anilines exhibit utility in the synthesis of anti-bacterials and antifungals.[23] Bearing this in mind condensation products 6j and 6k were obtained with excellent yields and selectivities (98:2 e.r.). We then evaluated the use of aliphatic amines in the Petasis borono-Mannich reaction. Chiral homoallylic amine products derived from aliphatic amine Mannich allylation reactions are challenging to achieve in high enantio-selectivities,[14] although important for natural product and bioactive molecule synthesis.[24] Higher biphenol catalyst concentrations enabled the use of p-methoxy-benzylamine and allylamine in the Petasis allylation reaction, affording 6l and 6m in excellent yields and enantioselectivities (>95:5). Products such as the di-olefin 6m serve as precursors for ring closing metathesis, utilized as building blocks in synthesis.[25] Furthermore, aliphatic aldehydes were also successfully used with benzylamine (6n and 6o) further demonstrating the scope of the asymmetric Petasis borono-Mannich allylation reaction.

We then turned our attention to the asymmetric Petasis crotylation reaction of imines. Crotylborations are expected to proceed through a Zimmerman-Traxler transition state (TS), resulting in high diastereoselectivities.[6,26] However, the stereochemical outcome of imine crotylborations can be complicated by factors: 1) whether a boat TS[15] or a chair TS is involved in the reaction and 2) spontaneous E/Z isomerization of the imines[27] prior to crotylboration.[26] As anticipated, (E)-crotylboronate 7 resulted in the formation of the anti-diastereomer 9a in high diastereo- and enantioselectivity. Conversely, (Z)-crotylboronate 8 afforded the syn-diastereomer 10a predominantly in low e.r. yield and d.r. (9:1, Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Asymmetric crotylation. [a] 2 mol% catalyst. [b] 4 mol% catalyst. [b] 8 mol% catalyst.

The observed enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity was consistent with the reaction of (E)-crotyl boronate with acyl imines.[15] In contrast, the (Z)-crotyl boronate afforded the anticipated syn product in the present study.[26] The observed enantioselectivity but lower diasteroselectivity and yield for (Z)-crotylboration can be attributed to a pseudo-diaxial interaction between the crotyl-methyl group on the boronate and the aryl substituent of in situ isomerized Z-imine.[26] The benzyl amine imine was also evaluated in the crotylation reaction. The (E)-and (Z)-crotylboronate afforded the corresponding anti- and syn-diastereomers in excellent diastereoselectivities and enantioselectivities (Scheme 3). The syn-diastereomer 10b was achieved in a higher diastereoselectivity in comparison to 10a; attributed to the free rotation introduced by the additional methylene of the benzyl group reducing the steric interaction in the transition state between the (Z)-crotylmethyl group and the N-benzyl substituent.

In summary, we have developed an asymmetric Petasis borono-Mannich allylation reaction that affords chiral homoallylic amines using chiral biphenol catalysts. The enantioselective reaction is tolerant of aldehydes and amines possessing a range of electronic and steric properties. The reaction is operationally straightforward; a one-pot, two-step procedure affording the chiral amine products in excellent yields and enantioselectivities. Furthermore, the crotylboration reactions provide access to both syn- and anti-diastereomers which bear two vicinal stereogenic centers. The generality of the imine condensation step indicates a broader utility of the allylation products than has been previously observed for enantioselective allylation reactions.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by NIH (R01 GM078240 and P50 GM067041).

References

  • 1.a) Petasis NA, Zavialov IA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:11798–11799. [Google Scholar]; b) Petasis NA, Goodman A, Zavialov IA. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:16463–16470. [Google Scholar]; c) Petasis NA, Zavialov IA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:445–446. [Google Scholar]; d) Petasis NA, Akritopoulou I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:583–586. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.For reviews on Petasis reaction: de Graaff C, Ruijter E, Orru RVA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:3969–4009. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15361k.Candeias NR, Montalbano F, Cal PMSD, Gois PMP. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:6169–6193. doi: 10.1021/cr100108k.
  • 3.a) Su B, Zhang H, Deng M, Wang Q. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014;12:3616–3621. doi: 10.1039/c4ob00200h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ren H, Wulff WD. Org. Lett. 2013;15:242–245. doi: 10.1021/ol302769r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Bonazzi S, Cheng B, Wzorek JS, Evans DA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:9338–9341. doi: 10.1021/ja404673s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) White JD, Hansen JD. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:1963–1977. doi: 10.1021/jo0486387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Nicolaou KC, Mitchell HJ, van Delft FL, Rübsam F, Rodríguez RM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998;37:1871–1874. [Google Scholar]; Nicolaou KC, Mitchell HJ, van Delft FL, Rübsam F, Rodríguez RM. Angew. Chem. 1998;110:1972–1974. [Google Scholar]; f) Schmidt U, Schmidt J. Synthesis. 1994:300–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a) Munagala S, Sirasani G, Kokkonda P, Phadke M, Krynetskaia N, Lu P, Sharom FJ, Chaudhury S, Abdulhameed MDM, Tawa G, Wallqvist A, Martinez R, Childers W, Abou-Gharbia M, Krynetskiy E, Andrade RB. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014;22:1148–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhao S, Sirasani G, Vaddypally S, Zdilla MJ, Andrade RB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:8309–8311. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Zhao S, Sirasani G, Vaddypally S, Zdilla MJ, Andrade RB. Angew. Chem. 2013;125:8467–8469. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Reddy NSS, Reddy BJM, Reddy BVS. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013;54:4228–4231. [Google Scholar]; d) Siva Senkar Reddy N, Srinivas Reddy A, Yadav JS, Subba Reddy BV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:6916–6918. [Google Scholar]; e) Bosque I, González-Gómez JC, Guijarro A, Foubelo F, Yus M. J. Org. Chem. 2012;77:10340–10346. doi: 10.1021/jo302045y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Sirasani G, Andrade RB. Org. Lett. 2011;13:4736–4737. doi: 10.1021/ol202056w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.For recent reviews on asymmetric imine allylations: Yus M, González-Gómez JC, Foubelo F. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:7774–7854. doi: 10.1021/cr1004474.Ramadhar TR, Batey RA. Synthesis. 2011;2011:1321–1346.Friestad GK, Mathies AK. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:2541–2569. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.06.117.Ding H, Friestad GK. Synthesis. 2005:2815–2829.Puentes CO, Kouznetsov V. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2002;39:595–614.Alvaro G, Savoia D. Synlett. 2002;2002:0651–0673.Denmark SE, Almstead NG. In: Modern Carbonyl Chemistry. Otera J, editor. Weinheim, Germany: 2007. pp. 299–401.
  • 6.For recent reviews on asymmetric imine allylborations: Huo H-X, Duvall JR, Huang M-Y, Hong R. Org. Chem. Front. 2014;1:303–320.Ramachandrant PV, Burghardt TE. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006;78:1397–1406.
  • 7.Acyl imines: Momiyama N, Nishimoto H, Terada M. Org. Lett. 2011;13:2126–2129. doi: 10.1021/ol200595b.Kiyohara H, Nakamura Y, Matsubara R, Kobayashi S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:1615–1617. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504196.Kiyohara H, Nakamura Y, Matsubara R, Kobayashi S. Angew. Chem. 2006;118:1645–1647. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504196.
  • 8.Phosphinoyl imines: van der Mei FW, Miyamoto H, Silverio DL, Hoveyda AH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:4701–4706. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600546.van der Mei FW, Miyamoto H, Silverio DL, Hoveyda AH. Angew. Chem. 2016;128:4779–4784. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600546.Silverio DL, Torker S, Pilyugina T, Vieira EM, Snapper ML, Haeffner F, Hoveyda AH. Nature. 2013;494:216–221. doi: 10.1038/nature11844.
  • 9.Sulfonyl imines: Luo Y, Hepburn HB, Chotsaeng N, Lam HW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:8309–8313. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204004.Luo Y, Hepburn HB, Chotsaeng N, Lam HW. Angew. Chem. 2012;124:8434–8438. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204004.Aydin J, Kumar KS, Sayah MJ, Wallner OA, Szabó KJ. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:4689–4697. doi: 10.1021/jo070288b.
  • 10.Silyl imines: Chen JLY, Aggarwal VK. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:10992–10996. doi: 10.1002/anie.201407127.Chen JLY, Aggarwal VK. Angew. Chem. 2014;126:11172–11176.Canales E, Hernandez E, Soderquist JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:8712–8713. doi: 10.1021/ja062242q.Ramachandran PV, Burghardt TE. Chem. Eur. J. 2005;11:4387–4395. doi: 10.1002/chem.200401295.
  • 11.Hydrazones and acyl hydrazones: Feske MI, Santanilla AB, Leighton JL. Org. Lett. 2010;12:688–691. doi: 10.1021/ol9026864.Fujita M, Nagano T, Schneider U, Hamada T, Ogawa C, Kobayashi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:2914–2915. doi: 10.1021/ja710627x.Tan KL, Jacobsen EN. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:1315–1317. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603354.Tan KL, Jacobsen EN. Angew. Chem. 2007;119:1337–1339.Kargbo R, Takahashi Y, Bhor S, Cook GR, Lloyd-Jones GC, Shepperson IR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:3846–3847. doi: 10.1021/ja070742t.Berger R, Duff K, Leighton JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:5686–5687. doi: 10.1021/ja0486418.Berger R, Rabbat PMA, Leighton JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:9596–9597. doi: 10.1021/ja035001g.
  • 12.Cyclic imines: Alam R, Diner C, Jonker S, Eriksson L, Szabó KJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016 doi: 10.1002/anie.201608605.Alam R, Diner C, Jonker S, Eriksson L, Szabó KJ. Angew. Chem. 2016 doi: 10.1002/ange.201608605.Miyazaki M, Ando N, Sugai K, Seito Y, Fukuoka H, Kanemitsu T, Nagata K, Odanaka Y, Nakamura KT, Itoh T. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:534–542. doi: 10.1021/jo101956m.Wu TR, Chong JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:9646–9647. doi: 10.1021/ja0636791.
  • 13.N-aryl imines: Rabbat PM, Valdez SC, Leighton JL. Org. Lett. 2006;8:6119–6121. doi: 10.1021/ol062589y.Gastner T, Ishitani H, Akiyama R, Kobayashi S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:1896–1898.Gastner T, Ishitani H, Akiyama R, Kobayashi S. Angew. Chem. 2001;113:1949–1951.
  • 14.N-alkyl imines: Fernandes RA, Chaudhari DA. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012;2012:1945–1952.Perl NR, Leighton JL. Org. Lett. 2007;9:3699–3701. doi: 10.1021/ol701723w.Wada R, Shibuguchi T, Makino S, Oisaki K, Kanai M, Shibasaki M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:7687–7691. doi: 10.1021/ja061510h.Fernandes RA, Yamamoto Y. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:735–738. doi: 10.1021/jo035453b.Fernandes RA, Stimac A, Yamamoto Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:14133–14139. doi: 10.1021/ja037272x.
  • 15.Lou S, Moquist PN, Schaus SE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:15398–15404. doi: 10.1021/ja075204v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li X, Liu X, Fu Y, Wang L, Zhou L, Feng X. Chem. Eur. J. 2008;14:4796–4798. doi: 10.1002/chem.200800534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gandhi S, List B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:2573–2576. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Gandhi S, Gandhi S, List B. Angew. Chem. 2013;125:2633–2636. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.a) Barbato KS, Luan Y, Ramella D, Panek JS, Schaus SE. Org. Lett. 2015;17:5812–5815. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Luan Y, Barbato KS, Moquist PN, Kodama T, Schaus SE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:3233–3236. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Luan Y, Schaus SE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:19965–19968. doi: 10.1021/ja309076g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Barnett DS, Schaus SE. Org. Lett. 2011;13:4020–4023. doi: 10.1021/ol201535b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Moquist PN, Kodama T, Schaus SE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49:7096–7100. doi: 10.1002/anie.201003469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Moquist PN, Kodama T, Schaus SE. Angew. Chem. 2010;122:7250–7254. doi: 10.1002/anie.201003469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Barnett DS, Moquist PN, Schaus SE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:8679–8682. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Barnett DS, Moquist PN, Schaus SE. Angew. Chem. 2009;121:8835–8838. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Bishop JA, Lou S, Schaus SE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:4337–4340. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Bishop JA, Lou S, Schaus SE. Angew. Chem. 2009;121:4401–4404. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Lou S, Schaus SE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6922–6923. doi: 10.1021/ja8018934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.a) Shih J-L, Nguyen TS, May JA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:9931–9935. doi: 10.1002/anie.201503528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Shih J-L, Nguyen TS, May JA. Angew. Chem. 2015;127:10069–10073. [Google Scholar]; b) Alam R, Vollgraff T, Eriksson L, Szabó KJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:11262–11265. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b07498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhang Y, Li N, Qu B, Ma S, Lee H, Gonnella NC, Gao J, Li W, Tan Z, Reeves JT, Wang J, Lorenz JC, Li G, Reeves DC, Premasiri A, Grinberg N, Haddad N, Lu BZ, Song JJ, Senanayake CH. Organic Letters. 2013;15:1710–1713. doi: 10.1021/ol400498a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Le PQ, Nguyen TS, May JA. Org. Lett. 2012;14:6104–6107. doi: 10.1021/ol3030605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Lundy BJ, Jansone-Popova S, May JA. Org. Lett. 2011;13:4958–4961. doi: 10.1021/ol2020847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Wu TR, Chong JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:4908–4909. doi: 10.1021/ja0713734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Wu TR, Chong JM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:3244–3245. doi: 10.1021/ja043001q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Denmark SE, Nakajima N, Stiff CM, Nicaise OJC, Kranz M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008;350:1023–1045. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200800017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Synthesis of chiral allylglycines: Sun X-W, Liu M, Xu M-H, Lin G-Q. Org. Lett. 2008;10:1259–1262. doi: 10.1021/ol8001514.Selander N, Kipke A, Sebelius S, Szabó KJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:13723–13731. doi: 10.1021/ja074917a.Myers AG, Gleason JL. Org. Synth. 1999;76:57–76.
  • 22.Chiral allylglycines in total syntheses: Ryan SJ, Zhang Y, Kennan AJ. Org. Lett. 2005;7:4765–4767. doi: 10.1021/ol0520222.Xie W, Zou B, Pei D, Ma D. Org. Lett. 2005;7:2775–2777. doi: 10.1021/ol050991r.McGarvey GJ, Benedum TE, Schmidtmann FW. Org. Lett. 2002;4:3591–3594. doi: 10.1021/ol0264861.Borzilleri RM, Zheng X, Schmidt RJ, Johnson JA, Kim S-H, DiMarco JD, Fairchild CR, Gougoutas JZ, Lee FYF, Long BH, Vite GD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:8890–8897.
  • 23.a) Suvire FD, Sortino M, Kouznetsov VV, Vargas M LY, Zacchino SA, Cruz UM, Enriz RD. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006;14:1851–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Urbina JM, Cortes JCG, Palma A, Lopez SN, Zacchino SA, Enriz RD, Ribas JC, Kouznetzov VV. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000;8:691–698. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(00)00003-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wakchaure VN, Kaib PSJ, Leutzsch M, List B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:11852–11856. doi: 10.1002/anie.201504052.Wakchaure VN, Kaib PSJ, Leutzsch M, List B. Angew. Chem. 2015;127:12019–12023. doi: 10.1002/anie.201504052.Nugent TC, editor. Chiral Amine Synthesis: Methods, Developments and Applications. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2010.
  • 25.a) Fernandes RA, Nallasivam JL. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012;10:7789–7800. doi: 10.1039/c2ob26188j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Agami C, Couty F, Evano G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2000;11:4639–4643. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alam R, Das A, Huang G, Eriksson L, Himo F, Szabo KJ. Chem. Sci. 2014;5:2732–2738. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.a) Alvaro G, Boga C, Savoia D, Umani-Ronchi A. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1996;1:875–882. [Google Scholar]; b) Corey EJ, Decicco CP, Newbold RC. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991;32:5287–5290. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES