Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2017 Dec;285:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.10.006

Direct enhancement of nitrogen-15 targets at high-field by fast ADAPT-SABRE

Soumya S Roy a, Gabriele Stevanato b, Peter J Rayner a, Simon B Duckett a,
PMCID: PMC5720475  PMID: 29102821

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Keywords: Hyperpolarization, PHIP, SABRE, ADAPT

Highlights

  • SABRE hyperpolarization is achieved at high field by the ADAPT pulse sequence.

  • A theoretical description of ADAPT-SABRE is linked to related methods for comparison.

  • ADAPT-SABRE achieves faster magnetization transfer than several analogous approaches.

  • ∼3 orders of magnitude signal enhancement produced in 1.6 s for a 15N target.

Abstract

Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange (SABRE) is an attractive nuclear spin hyperpolarization technique capable of huge sensitivity enhancement in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) detection. The resonance condition of SABRE hyperpolarization depends on coherent spin mixing, which can be achieved naturally at a low magnetic field. The optimum transfer field to spin-1/2 heteronuclei is technically demanding, as it requires field strengths weaker than the earth’s magnetic field for efficient spin mixing. In this paper, we illustrate an approach to achieve strong 15N SABRE hyperpolarization at high magnetic field by a radio frequency (RF) driven coherent transfer mechanism based on alternate pulsing and delay to achieve polarization transfer. The presented scheme is found to be highly robust and much faster than existing related methods, producing 3 orders of magnitude 15N signal enhancement within 2 s of RF pulsing.

1. Introduction

Despite the huge success of NMR in a wide assortment of research fields ranging from structural material characterization to the imaging of internal human organs, it is still regarded to be underexploited based on its theoretical potential [1], [2]. Most of the successes of NMR and MRI applications have been achieved utilizing the thermal level of nuclear spin polarization which is only of the order of 10−5 at room temperature in a standard high field spectrometer [2]: only one spin in 30,000 contributes to the NMR signal for protons in a 9.4 T magnet. Improving this poor sensitivity would make NMR and MRI more widespread and cost-efficient. The solution to this challenge is offered by hyperpolarization methods that enhance the nuclear spin polarization by up to 5 orders of magnitude compared to standard thermal polarization [3]. This large sensitivity enhancement enables the completion of high-end MRI applications e.g. in vivo study of human cancer, which could otherwise not be performed due to sensitivity issues [4], [5], [6].

Within the class of hyperpolarization techniques, the Para-hydrogen Induced Polarization (PHIP) method employs a highly ordered nuclear singlet, para-hydrogen (p-H2) gas, to enhance poorly polarized substrate spins by several orders of magnitude [7], [8]. An important variant of the PHIP technique, SABRE was introduced in 2009, that no longer requires active hydrogenation to hyperpolarize targeted molecules [9]. It relies on the temporary association of the substrate at a metal center where the associated J-coupling network ultimately enables the generation of hyperpolarized substrates (see Fig. 1a). SABRE provides a simple, fast and cost-efficient approach to hyperpolarize substrates in its original form and they can be re-polarized several times in quick succession, providing the opportunity to achieve continuous hyperpolarization [10]. The method has been successful in polarizing a large class of biologically relevant substrates where their 1H, 13C and 15N nuclei [11], [12], [13], [14] are senitised, and also in preparing long-lived forms that are detectable for up to 30 min [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Considering their biological relevance, hyperpolarizing spin-1/2 heteronuclei already show great importance for in vivo MRI studies [20], [21].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Schematic depiction of SABRE hyperpolarization mechanism. The standard Iridium based metal catalyst (Ir-Imes) is used with IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl) imidazol-2-ylidene. Singlet order from para-hydrogen is introduced reversibly to the hydrides, which subsequently transfer the polarization to substrate spins (15N-sub) via a J-coupling network under suitable resonance conditions. (b) ADAPT pulse sequence used in this study to achieve high-field SABRE transfer.

The coherent spin mixing condition for heteronuclei in SABRE can be achieved by bubbling the solution at ultra-low magnetic field (typically 0.2–1.0 μT), as previously shown by Theis et al. [22]. However, this low-field technique requires field-cycling between low and high magnetic fields, a condition that is both technically demanding and unsuitable for immediate signal detection. Overcoming this challenge, Warren and co-workers proposed the LIGHT-SABRE approach to create a similar resonance condition at high field by applying an optimized spin-lock based RF pulse sequence [23]. Pravdivtsev et al. have since developed a ramp based CW pulse to achieve hyperolarization in heteronuclei [24], [25].

Here we show that, the recently published ADAPT (Alternating Delays Achieve Polarization Transfer) sequence [26] can be applied to transfer polarization from singlet hydrides to target 15N nuclei in a repetitive fashion. It takes only few seconds to build up strong 15N hyerpolarized signal whilst the transfer mechanism is fully compatible with LIGHT-SABRE [23], Level Anti-Crossing (LAC) [27] and PHIP spin-order transfer mechanisms [28].

This article is organized as follows: In Section 2 we briefly describe the ADAPT method and its optimizations by simulations to yield a SABRE perspective. In Section 3 we present experimental details and results. Finally, Section 4 contains conclusions and discussions.

2. Methods

2.1. ADAPT approach

We consider a system formed by three nuclear spins: two hydride 1H (1 and 2 in Fig. 1a) and a 15N (3 in Fig. 1a). The aim is to transfer nuclear spin polarization between the 1H singlet spin population and 15N longitudinal magnetization. 1H chemical equivalence is assumed, and it is experimentally imposed by CW irradiation on the 1H channel.

In a doubly rotating frame, if the 1H nuclei are chemically equivalent, the J coupling terms form the coherent Hamiltonian:

HJ=ωJI1·I2+ωΣ+ωΔ2I1zI3z+ωΣ-ωΔ2I2zI3z (1)

where ωJ=2πJ12,ωΣ=2π(J13+J23) and ωΔ=2π(J13-J23). We use a basis formed by the direct product of the singlet-triplet basis for 1H spins 1 and 2, and the eigenbasis for the I3x operator of 15N spin 3. In this basis, the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) can be decomposed into the direct sum of four orthogonal subspaces as detailed in Ref. [26]. However, we restrict the ADAPT analysis to the two relevant orthogonal subspaces Ha,b and Hc,d containing the proton singlet state:

2.1. (2)
2.1. (3)

where |a=-(|S0,α-|S0,β),|b=(|T0,α+|T0,β),|c=-(|T0,α-|T0,β) and |d=(|S0,α+|S0,β). The out-of-diagonal elements -ωΔ4 in Eqs. (2), (3) can be exploited to transfer polarization from |S0S0| to I3x. One of such methods is the ADAPT sequence as shown in Fig. 1b. It performs the task via a number of RF pulses and delays that are recursively repeated. Small and/or large α tip angle pulses can be used, providing the experimentalist a further degree of freedom. The protocol includes a number of steps: (i) definition of the tip angle: for example α=30°, (ii) calculation of the conversion efficiency for a given range of delays Δ and loop numbers m as detailed in [26], (iii) choice of the optimal pair Δopt and mopt. A 90° pulse at the end of the loops (see Fig. 1b), is inserted to transform I3x into I3z so as to retain magnetization on the substrate upon dissociation. For the present case, the J-coupling network is known: J12=8 Hz, J13-J23=25.5 Hz, and J13+J23=25.5 Hz and a theoretical transfer of 93% is achieved by ADAPT30 in about 40 ms with Δ=8 ms and m=5. In practice, multiple repetitions of this block are required to build up bulk longitudinal heteronuclear magnetization (see Fig. 5). To keep our studies simple, in this work we employ ADAPT30 which experimentally we found to be optimal, however as predicted all of the combinations of α,Δ and m we tested produced a return [26].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

ADAPT-SABRE derived 15N spectra showing free substrate peaks with increasing numbers (n) of ADAPT block (see Fig. 4). A maximum enhancement of 940-fold was achieved at n = 40.

ADAPT remains robust even in the case of uncertainty about the value of the heteronuclear J23 (simulations not shown).

2.2. Initial state and trajectories

When the para-hydrogen and the substrate bind to the catalyst, the initial state can be represented as an overpopulation of the 1H scalar singlet order. We can define a set of orthogonal operators Ixrs,Iyrs,Izrs with cyclic commutation relationships [Ixrs,Iyrs]=iIzrs, for each of the 2×2 subspaces in Eqs. (2), (3). The initial state and the observable I3x 15N-transverse magnetization are related to the following single transitions operators:

|S0S0|12(Izab-Izcd)I3x2-12(Izab+Izcd) (4)

From the set of Eq. (4), it is apparent that polarization transfer can be obtained, for example, when a sequence of events invert the sign of the operator Izcd while maintaining the sign of the operator Izab. ADAPT achieves this by performing a π rotation in the subspace Hc,d (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

ADAPT induced rotations in the subspaces Ha,b and Hc,d upon application of ADAPT30 for Δ=8 ms and m=5 for J12 = 8 Hz, J13-J23 = 25.5 Hz.

2.3. Analogy with the LIGHT-SABRE and the LAC approach

A LAC [27] occurs when (i) the energy level relative to a pair of states |m and |n is equal E|m=E|n and (ii) there is a matrix element Vmn=m|V|n for some operator V that splits them. Essentially, the LIGHT-SABRE and LAC methods share the same clever idea: a resonance condition between the spin populations of the subspaces Ha,b and Hc,d can be established upon spin locking on the heteronuclear channel. The Hamiltonian operator for a constant RF heteronuclear irradiation is HRF=2πνRFI3x. The ramp modulation used in the LAC method can be included by introducing a time dependency in the term νRF. For simplicity, here we disregard the time dependency νRF as in the LIGHT-SABRE protocol [23]. The matrix representation of the Hamiltonian operator H=HJ+HRF transforms Eqs. (2), (3)into:

2.3. (5)
2.3. (6)

In Eqs. (5), (6), when νRF=J12,E|a=E|b=E|c=E|d so that a level crossing occurs. More importantly, in presence of magnetic inequivalence ωΔ0, and a LAC can be established for each subspace in Eqs. (5), (6). As a result, the heteronuclear J-coupling imbalance removes the degeneracy and promotes spin population transfer in each subspace Ha,b and Hc,d. The term ωΔ is completely analogous to Vmn. The duration of the optimal spin lock is inversely proportional to 2ωΔ [23]. To complete the analogy with the ADAPT method, it has also been noted by Theis et al. [23], that the effect of the CW irradiation is to produce a π pulse which transfers population between the hydrogen singlet population to the 15N transverse magnetization: precisely the same transformation achieved by ADAPT in the subspace of Eq. (3)(see Fig. 2).

3. Experimental results and discussions

All the measurements were carried out with a 500 MHz Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a broad-band (BBO) probe at 298 K. The sample was prepared in a 5 mm NMR tube by mixing 10 mM of [IrCl(COD)(IMes)] (IMes = 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl) imidazole-2-ylidene, COD = cycloocta-1,5-diene) pre-catalyst and 50 mM of 15N-ethylnicotinate [29] in 0.6 ml methanol-d4 solution. A valve-controlled para-hydrogen flow PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) tube was immersed inside the NMR tube to bubble the solution with para-hydrogen originating from a para-hydrogen generator with 90% enrichment. To accurately assign the resonances of the concerned spins and measuring their coupling constants within the network, we first performed a standard in-magnet PHIP experiment by bubbling p-H2 inside the spectrometer and recording a 1H spectrum upon applying a 45° pulse on the proton channel. A large and transient antiphase spectrum is observed in the hydride region reflecting the hydrogenation product, resulting from reaction with p-H2. Both the hydrides (spin-1 and -2) show overlapping resonances at −22.66 ppm as shown in Fig. 3. The 2JHH and cis-2JNH coupling constants were simply measured from the hydride region of the spectrum. Whilst trans-2JNH could not be observed it is expected to be negligible (<0.5 Hz) in these types of system [12], [27].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

1H PHIP NMR spectrum of 15N- ethylnicotinate measured in a 500 MHz spectrometer, showing enhanced hydride region. The coupling constants presented in Fig. 1a can be calculated from the spectrum. The ‘down-field’ region (0–10 ppm) is vertically multiplied by 8 compared to the ‘up-field’ (hydride) region.

Next we performed a standard SABRE-SHEATH experiment [22] by shaking the solution with p-H2 inside a μ-metal can and then quickly recording a 15N spectra upon a 90° detection pulse. The purpose of this experiment was to find out the 15N resonance frequencies for the different forms of the substrate; the substrate can be free from the catalyst and also bound to the catalyst. Two different forms of bound substrate exist here (equatorial and axial position). In our study, we observe 15N free resonance at 303.22 ppm and equatorial-bound resonance at 256.60 ppm whilst the axial-bound resonance remains undetected due to insufficient detectable polarization. The parameters obtained from these initial screening experiments were sufficient to optimize the ADAPT pulse sequence numerically (see Fig. 1b).

The high-field SABRE experiments were performed according to the experimental protocol depicted in Fig. 4. After a suitable relaxation delay, p-H2 was bubbled through the solution for a duration of τb (typically 10 s) followed by a short waiting period (τw 1 s.) for the solution to settle. The optimized ADAPT pulse sequence immediately followed with a total duration of τrf (Δ×m×n), selectively exciting the bound-15N resonance without affecting the free resonance. The offset for 15N channel was set on the bound-peak (256.60 ppm) whilst the band-width (BW) of the RF pulse was kept at 500 Hz (10 ppm). After n number of repeated ADAPT blocks, a hard 90° pulse was applied to detect the magnetization. During the RF sequence, a continuous-wave (CW) pulse of 1 kHz band-width was applied in proton channel resonant with the hydride region to enforce chemical equivalence between the hydride protons. However, when performed without any CW pulse in proton channel, we observe polarization transfer, albeit with a 30–40% of less enhancement than earlier.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Experimental timings and RF sequence for the high-field ADAPT-SABRE experiment. The solution was bubbled by p-H2 gas for the duration of τb; after that an appropriate waiting time (τw) was provided to settle down the solution before applying the ADAPT pulse sequence (as shown in Fig. 1b) in 15N channel on-resonance and selectively exciting the equatorial bound peak. The ADAPT block was repeated n times before a final 90° hard pulse detects the signal. A low-powered continuous wave (CW) pulse was applied on 1H channel throughout the experiment on-resonance to the hydrides region.

Using the numerically optimized parameters (see Section 2), the ADAPT sequence efficiently transfers singlet-order polarization of hydrides into longitudinal polarization of 15N nuclei that are connected to the network. An optimum level of polarization can be realized for ADAPT30 with Δ = 8 ms and m=5 in a total pulse duration of only 40 ms. Using these parameters, one ADAPT block achieves 196-fold enhancement factor () for the free 15N target. The enhancement factor () of hyerpolarization was calculated as the ratio of the integral for the hyperpolarized signal and the integral for the thermal signal divided by the number of thermal scans. As SABRE is an exchangeable process, the polarization transfer rate is limited by the residence time of both the hydrides and the free substrate, which are in the range of 100–200 ms under standard SABRE conditions. As a result, hydrogenation with p-H2 and therefore the polarization transfer does not occur simultaneously across the entire sample volume. For this reason, the ADAPT block has to be repeated multiple times to build up 15N polarization. In practice, one block of ADAPT sequence transfers only a fraction of available polarization into 15N magnetization. But as long as fresh p-H2 keeps exchanging together with non-polarized substrates, we observe accumulation in 15N magnetization by repeated application of the ADAPT block. Fig. 5 presents a gradual build-up in free 15N magnetization with increasing numbers of ADAPT blocks. A maximum enhancement of 940-fold was achieved after 40 ADAPT blocks of total duration 1.6 s. Ultimately, spin relaxation together with p-H2 consumption take over in the magnetization build-up process and starts decreasing with larger loop counts. The is also limited by several other factors e.g. RF inhomogeneity and imperfections caused by mixing and diffusion [30], [31].

In Fig. 6 we show the success of the ADAPT-SABRE method in driving polarization from singlet-hydrides to bound 15N nuclei of ethylnicotinate and enhancing the free 15N response. The earlier parameters were used to achieve the 1-shot ADAPT-SABRE spectra in Fig. 6a. The corresponding thermal signal in Fig. 6b was acquired by averaging 400 transients with a recycle delay of 120 s (T1(15N) = 21.5 ± 0.5 s), taking over 13.5 h. The bound peaks remain undetectable in the thermal measurements even after many scans signifying greater relative enhancements as predicted previously [25]. The lack of a thermal signal for the bound peaks can be attributed to their broad line shapes, they are visible after 2000 scans.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

15N NMR spectra of 15N-ethyl nicotinate showing hyperpolarized spectra acquired by ADAPT-SABRE method in seconds and (b) corresponding thermal spectra obtained by 90° hard pulses over 400 transients with 120 s of recycle delays (total experimental time of 13.5 h). The free15N resonance peak was observed at 303.2 ppm whilst the ‘equatorial-bound’ peak was found at 255.6 ppm.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have used ADAPT-SABRE to generate 15N hyperpolarization at high magnetic field without the requirement of below-earth field sample mixing. The conversion is robust and faster than previously reported methods: it took only 1.6 s to reach nearly 3 orders of signal enhancement for a 15N target. This method has several advantages over the low-field SABRE mechanism, e.g. constant field shuttling, unnecessary signal losses during transport. The presented scheme whilst being inherently simple, can be easily augmented to any SABRE active species and their 13C, 19F and 31P nuclei. We are currently working on its further optimization via exchange rate, sample concentration and additive-dependence studies. In the future, we plan to examine how the dynamics of SABRE exchange can be harnessed to improve this ADAPT process. We believe it will be of particular importance in terms of achieving in vivo hyperpolarization, where sample transport poses a significant challenge to hyperpolarization based experiments.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Wellcome Trust (092506 and 098335) and the ERC (advanced grant N. 320860) for funding. We thank Richard John and Fadi Ahwal for experimental help. The analysis and the simulations presented in this study make extensive use of the SpinDynamica code [32]. Data for this work can be found at: DOI: 10.15124/788cb3de-6213-4b5d-9ac5-90128535a6d6.

Contributor Information

Soumya S. Roy, Email: soumya.roy@york.ac.uk.

Gabriele Stevanato, Email: gabriele.stevanato@epfl.ch.

Simon B. Duckett, Email: simon.duckett@york.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Abragam A. Oxford University Press; 1961. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ernst R.R., Bodenhausen G., Wokaun A. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 1990. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee J.H., Okuno Y., Cavagnero S. J. Magn. Reson. 2014;241:18–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Golman K., in’tZandt R., Lerche M., Pehrson R., Ardenkjaer-Larsen J.H. Cancer Res. 2006;66:10855–10860. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Day S.E., Kettunen M.I., Gallagher F.A., Hu D.E., Lerche M., Wolber J., Golman K., Ardenkjaer-Larsen J.H., Brindle K.M. Nat. Med. 2007;13:1382–1387. doi: 10.1038/nm1650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bhattacharya P., Chekmenev E.Y., Perman W.H., Harris K.C., Lin A.P., Norton V.A., Tan C.T., Ross B.D., Weitekamp D.P. J. Magn. Reson. 2007;186:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bowers C.R., Weitekamp D.P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986;57:2645–2648. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Eisenberg R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991;24:110–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adams R.W., Aguilar J.A., Atkinson K.D., Cowley M.J., Elliott P.I.P., Duckett S.B., Green G.G.R., Khazal I.G., Lopez-Serrano J., Williamson D.C. Science. 2009;323:1708–1711. doi: 10.1126/science.1168877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mewis R.E., Duckett S.B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012;45:1247–1257. doi: 10.1021/ar2003094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zeng H.F., Xu J.D., Gillen J., McMahon M.T., Artemov D., Tyburn J.M., Lohman J.A.B., Mewis R.E., Atkinson K.D., Green G.G.R., Duckett S.B., van Zijl P.C.M. J. Magn. Reson. 2013;237:73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shchepin R.V., Barskiy D.A., Mikhaylov D.M., Chekmenev E.Y. Bioconjug. Chem. 2016;27:878–882. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barskiy D.A., Shchepin R.V., Coffey A.M., Theis T., Warren W.S., Goodson B.M., Chekmenev E.Y. J. Am. Chem. Sci. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:8080–8083. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rayner P.J., Burns M.J., Olaru A.M., Norcott P., Fekete M., Green G.G.R., Highton L.A.R., Mewis R.E., Duckett S.B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E3188–E3194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620457114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Theis T. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1501438. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roy S.S., Rayner P.J., Norcott P., Green G.G.R., Duckett S.B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:24905–24911. doi: 10.1039/c6cp02844f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roy S.S., Norcott P., Rayner P.J., Green G.G.R., Duckett S.B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:15642–15645. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roy S.S., Norcott P., Rayner P.J., Green G.G.R., Duckett S.B. Chem. Eur. J. 2017;23:10496–10500. doi: 10.1002/chem.201702767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Barskiy D.A., Shchepin R.V., Tanner C.P.N., Colell J.F.P., Goodson B.M., Theis T., Warren W.S., Chekmenev E.Y. ChemPhysChem. 2017;18:1493–1498. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201700416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nelson S.J. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:198ra108. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rodrigues T.B., Serrao E.M., Kennedy B.W.C., Hu D.E., Kettunen M.I., Brindle K.M. Nat. Med. 2014;20:93–98. doi: 10.1038/nm.3416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Theis T., Truong M.L., Coffey A.M., Shchepin R.V., Waddell K.W., Shi F., Goodson B.M., Warren W.S., Chekmenev E.Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:1404–1407. doi: 10.1021/ja512242d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Theis T., Truong M.L., Coffey A.M., Chekmenev E.Y., Warren W.S. J. Magn. Reson. 2014;248:23–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pravdivtsev A.N., Yurkovskaya A.V., Vieth H.-M., Ivanov K.L. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2015;119:13619–13629. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pravdivtsev A.N., Yurkovskaya A.V., Zimmermann H., Vieth H.-M., Ivanov K.L. RSC Adv. 2015;5:63615–63623. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stevanato G. J. Magn. Reson. 2017;274:148–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pravdivtsev A.N., Yurkovskaya A.V., Lukzen N.N., Vieth H.-M., Ivanov K.L. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:18707–18719. doi: 10.1039/c4cp01445f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bär S., Lange T., Leibfritz D., Hennig J., Elverfeldt D.V., Hövener J.-B. J. Magn. Reson. 2012;225:25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.15N ethyl nicotinate was synthesised in 3 steps beginning with the cyclisation of diethyl acetone-1,3-dicarboxylate in the presence of HC(OEt)3 and 15NH4OH. The resultant dihydroxypyridine was treated with POCl3 and then underwent palladium mediated hydrogenosis to give the desired compound. Full experimental procedures and characterisation data is available from the York Data Catalogue.
  • 30.Barskiy D.A., Yurkovskaya A.V., Ivanov K.L., Kovtunov K.V., Koptyug I.V. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:89–93. doi: 10.1039/c5cp05134g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Knecht S., Pravdivtsev A.N., Hövener J.-B., Yurkovskaya A.V., Ivanov K.L. RSC Adv. 2016;6:24470–24477. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.C. Bengs and M.H. Levitt Magn. Reson. Chem., 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.4642 (in press). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

RESOURCES