Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Microbiology
. 2017 Aug;9(4):219–223.

Molecular detection of Bordetella holmesii in two infants with pertussis-like syndrome: the first report from Iran

Masoumeh Nakhost Lotfi 1, Vajiheh Sadat Nikbin 1, Omid Nasiri 1, Farzad Badmasti 1, Fereshteh Shahcheraghi 1,*
PMCID: PMC5723974  PMID: 29238457

Abstract

Background and Objectives:

Bordetella holmesii is associated with a pertussis-like respiratory syndrome in healthy individuals and also a rare cause of septicaemia, endocarditis, pneumonia, and septic arthritis, mostly in immunocompromised patients. Culture technique and real-time PCR are 2 methods used to detect Bordetella spp.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, 435 nasopharyngeal specimens of patients with suspected whooping cough were checked for the presence of B. holmesii using 2 methods of culture technique and real-time PCR.

Results:

In this study, we detected hIS1001 and IS481 of B. holmesii in 2 infants suspected of having pertussis-like syndrome.

Conclusion:

Our observations demonstrate that accurate diagnosis is needed to discriminate between B. holmesii and B. pertussis infections among pertussis cases; otherwise, it could lead to misestimating pertussis rate and vaccine efficacy.

Keywords: Bordetella holmesii, Real-time PCR, HIS1001, Pertussis-like Infections

INTRODUCTION

Bordetella holmesii is a Gram- negative coccobacillus, strictly aerobic and slow-growing organism, which was first identified as a species in 1995 (1). Little information is available on the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of B. holmesii. Although B. holmesii has not been historically associated with a cough illness, this pathogen has recently been more associated with a pertussis-like respiratory syndrome in healthy individuals (2, 3). It is difficult to ensure whether B. holmesii is in fact responsible for the clinical symptoms, as the sequencing of B. holmesii genome has harbored any gene encoding virulence factors similar to those of B. pertussis (4). Moreover, B. holmesii is also a rare cause of septicemia, endocarditis, pneumonia and septic arthritis, mostly in immunocompromised patients (5).

Respiratory infection associated with B. holmesii is frequently misidentified as whooping cough with B. pertussis. Although no fatal cases of B. holmesii have been reported, invasive infections associated with this bacterium can cause substantial morbidities even in previously healthy individuals. Antimicrobial treatment can be difficult because susceptibility of B. holmesii to macrolides and third generation cephalosporin is lower than expected (6, 7).

Based on previous investigations, B. holmesii does not have a clear reservoir and transmission pattern. It is still unknown whether these species are pathogens for humans or they should be considered as opportunistic bacteria. However, the biological diagnosis has confirmed the presence of B. holmesii in human respiratory samples (710). Although Bordetella spp. are genetically similar to each other, they are different in the presence or absence of insertion sequences (ISs) and their copy number. For example, IS481 presents in B. pertussis, B. holmesii and B. bronchiseptica with 50–200, 8–10 and <5 copy number, respectively, while it has not been reported in B. parapertussis. Moreover, there is IS1001 in B. parapertussis and some of B. bronchiseptica; and hIS1001 has just been found in B. holmesii (11). Detection of ISs is the basis of molecular diagnosis among Bordetella species. Therefore, correct detection of Bordetella spp. need a precise molecular technique such as real-time PCR. On the other hand, the incorrect reports of pertussis-like syndrome associated with B. holmesii as whooping cough give rise to misestimating pertussis infection rate. It seems that B. holmesii may need a diagnostic assay and epidemiological surveillance. The present study aimed at detecting B. holmesii in clinical samples of patients suspected of having pertussis using real time PCR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients, sampling and culture.

Nasopharyngeal samples were taken from 435 pertussis suspected patients in all age ranges using Dacron swab. The swabs were put in Regan-Lowe (RL) agar (with oxacillin) as transport medium. One of the swabs was cultured on RL agar plates (with or without oxacillin in medium) and incubated at 35–36°C for 14 days. The second swab was used for DNA extraction and real-time PCR. In this study, the samples were not checked for the presence of viral or mycoplasmal infections.

DNA Extraction and Real-time PCR.

DNA was extracted from 200 μL of diluted specimen using High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit, as recommended by the supplier (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The extracted DNAs were eluted in a 100μL volume. Primers and TaqMan probes were designed to amplify IS481, IS1001, IS1002, ptxP and hIS1001, as demonstrated in Table 1. ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Bio-system, Inc.) was used for amplification. The temperature profile included an initial denaturation of 10 minutes at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. Acquisition of the fluorescence signal was set at 60°C during each cycle. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were determined automatically using the ABI SDS software. Positive control samples of purified DNA from the reference strains were B. petussis Tohama I, B. parapertussis 12822 and B. holmesii ATCC 51541; moreover, no template control samples (PCR-grade water) were included in each run. Eukaryotic RnaseP was used as internal control in each tube.

Table 1.

The primers and TaqMan probes was used in this study

Primer and probe name Sequence (5′→3′) Final concentration (μM) Reference
IS481 Fwd GCCGGATGAACACCCATAAG 0.25 (20)
IS481 Rev GCGATCAATTGCTGGACCAT 0.25
IS481 probe(FAM) CGATTGACCTTCCTACGTC-MGB 0.1
IS1001 Fwd AATTGCTGCAAGCCAACCA 0. 25 (20)
IS1001 Rev CCAGAGCCGTTTGAGTTCGT 0. 25
IS1001 probe(VIC) ACATAGACCGTCAGCAG- MGB 0.1
IS1002 Fwd CTAGGTCGAGCCCTTCTTGTTAAC 0. 25 (20)
IS1002 Rev GCGGGCAAGCCACTTGTA 0. 25
IS1002 probe(CY5) CATCGTCCAGTTCTGTTGCATCACCC-BHQ-3 0.1
ptxP Fwd TTCGTCGTACAAAACCCTCGA 0. 25 (21)
ptxP Rev GTTCATGCCGTGTTGGATTG 0. 25
ptxP probe(FAM) CTTCCGTACATCCC-BHQ-1 0.1
hIS1001 Fwd CCGTGCCAATCGGTAAAGTT 0. 25 (22)
hIS1001 Rev AAGGGCTGGTTGGCCTGGAGCA 0. 25
hIS1001 probe(FAM) GTCCTGCGTGACGAACTCAA 0.1
RNaseP Fwd CCAAGTGTGAGGGCTGAAAAG 0. 25 (23)
RNaseP Rev TGTTGTGGCTGATGAACTATAAAAGG 0. 25
RNaseP probe(Yakimayellow) CCCCAGTCTCTGTCACCACTCCC-BHQ-1 0.1

RESULTS

Culture and real-time PCR.

The suspensions of samples were cultured on RL agar for 14 days. However, no colonies were isolated as Bordetella spp. on the RL agar. Considering the high sensitivity of real-time PCR technique, all 435 samples were checked for IS481, IS1001, ptxP and hIS1001. Among the samples, 2 were detected as B. holmesii, which had hIS1001 with Ct value of 37.9 and 37.2, respectively, and also had IS481 with Ct value of 42.4 and 41.4; however, they were negative for IS1001 and ptxP. The results of culture and real-time PCR of the 2 positive samples are demonstrated in Table 2.

Table 2.

Laboratory findings for two patients with pertussis-like syndrome

Patient No. Culture IS481 IS1001 IS1002 ptxP hIS1001 RnaseP*
1 - + (41.4) − (UD) − (UD) − (UD) + (37.9) + (28.83)
2 - + (42. 4) − (UD) − (UD) − (UD) + (39.2) + (30.04)

UD means “undetectable”

*

Eukaryotic RnaseP was used as internal control in each tube

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.

The first case belonged to a 5- month-old female, who was admitted to a general hospital in southwest of Iran (Ahwaz, Khuzestan) in July 2015. Her symptoms were proximal cough and post-tussive vomiting but no fever. This patient had received 2 DTP vaccine doses including whole- cell of pertussis (wP) at 2 and 4 month olds. Prior to hospital admission, she had been injected 2 doses of azithromycin (10 mg/kg per day) by a physician. The second case was a 3- year- old female, who referred to a general hospital in northeast of Iran (Shirvan, khorasan) in June 2015. She had received all the vaccines (She had been injected 4 doses at 2, 4, 6, and 18 month olds.). There was no antibiotic prescription for this patient before sampling. Neither of the patients had splenectomy experience or immunocompromised status. However, we found that the two patients had close contacts with persons that had persistent cough.

DISCUSSION

Bordetella spp can be diagnosed using 2 methods: culture and real-time PCR (12). Cephalexin is widely used in culture medium of Bordetella spp. (eg, Regan–Lowe agar) and it has been acknowledged that it has an inhibitory effect on the growth of B. holmesii, which possibly explains why most laboratories did not identify B. holmesii in nasopharyngeal specimens of patients with pertussis-like symptoms before 2000 (13). Hence, meticillin or oxacillin is preferred to be to add to culture medium instead of cephalexin (14). In this study, no colonies were isolated as B. holmesii on the RL agar (with or without antibiotic in medium). The most difficulties in the isolation of Bordetella spp. are inappropriate techniques of specimen collection, transportation, and detection. Real-time PCR is a sensitive and acceptable assay to detect Bordetella spp. infection. Most of the PCR tests are based on detection of insertion sequences (IS) present in multiple copies per genome, increasing the sensitivity of PCR tests. The IS481 is the target mostly used to detect B. pertussis. However, the IS481, which has been associated with pertussis-like disease, is also present in B. holmesii (15, 16). There are only 2 specific molecular diagnostic approaches available: One for B. pertussis, the target is the sequence of the pertussis toxin gene promoter (17) and the other for B. holmesii, the target is the hIS1001 sequence (18). A retrospective study of 177 samples using real-time PCRs specific for B. pertussis and for B. holmesii showed that B. holmesii DNA was detected in 20.3% of the samples collected from adolescents and adults (8, 9).

The pertussis vaccination program in Iran includes 3 doses of a whole-cell pertussis vaccine together with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid (DTwP) at months 2, 4, and 6 of life and 2 booster doses at 18 months and to 6 years old. The incidence of B. pertussis in Iran was 0.5 cases per 100 000 population in 2008, which was higher than the previous year, 0.19 cases per 100 000 population (19). We believe that the re-emergence of pertussis is overestimated because the infection associated with B. parapertussis and B. holmesii are similar to pertussis infection and have usually been reported as pertussis cases, though they have milder nature and shorter duration. Therefore, accurate diagnosis is the utmost importance in evaluating vaccine efficacy. Interestingly, the mice model has shown that neither whole-cell (wP) cellular (aP) B. pertussis vaccination conferred protection against B. holmesii. Although T-cell responses induced by wP or aP cross-reacted with B. holmesii, vaccine-induced antibodies failed to efficiently bind to B. holmesii (20).

The reservoir of B. holmesii and transmission between humans are currently unknown. However, one report in Japan has demonstrated that 5 patients infected with B. holmesii showed epidemiologic linkage (2). In particular, the fact that 4 of these patients attended the same junior high school suggests that B. holmesii may be transmitted from person to person (2). However, in their conclusions, the authors explained that they did not check for any other causes of clinical symptoms, such as viral or mycoplasma causes. We have reported the first molecular diagnosis of B. holmesii in Iran using real-time PCR. Our observations revealed that accurate diagnosis is needed to discriminate between B. holmesii and B. pertussis infections among pertussis cases because symptoms associated with these 2 diseases are similar. The laboratory capacity limitations to detect B. holmesii from B. pertussis, give raise to the rate of infections associated with B. holmesii, which have been underestimated. Further studies, surveillance enhancement, and precise diagnosis are required to fully elucidate the burden of B. holmesii infections among infants, adolescents and adults.

ACkNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to acknowledge Kazunari Kamachi (National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan) for gifting DNA genome of B. holmesii ATCC 51541.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Weyant RS, Hollis DG, Weaver RE, Amin M, Steigerwalt AG, O’Connor SP, et al. Bordetella holmesii sp. nov., a new gram-negative species associated with septicemia. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kamiya H, Otsuka N, Ando Y, Odaira F, Yoshino S, Kawano K, et al. Transmission of Bordetella holmesii during pertussis outbreak, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis 2012;18:1166–1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mooi FR, Bruisten S, Linde I, Reubsaet F, Heuvelman K, van der Lee S, et al. Characterization of Bordetella holmesii isolates from patients with pertussis-like illness in the Netherlands. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2012;64:289–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bouchez V, Guiso N. Bordetella holmesii: comparison of two isolates from blood and a respiratory sample. Adv Infect Dis 2013;3:123–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pittet LF, Emonet S, Schrenzel J, Siegrist C-A, Posfay-Barbe KM. Bordetella holmesii: an under-recognised Bordetella species. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14:510–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shepard CW, Daneshvar MI, Kaiser RM, Ashford DA, Lonsway D, Patel JB, et al. Bordetella holmesii bacteremia: a newly recognized clinical entity among asplenic patients. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:799–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yih WK, Silva EA, Ida J, Harrington N, Lett SM, George H. Bordetella holmesii-like organisms isolated from Massachusetts patients with pertussis-like symptoms. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5:441–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Njamkepo E, Bonacorsi S, Debruyne M, Gibaud SA, Guillot S, Guiso N. Significant finding of Bordetella holmesii DNA in nasopharyngeal samples from French patients with suspected pertussis. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:4347–4348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rodgers L, Martin SW, Cohn A, Budd J, Marcon M, Terranella A, et al. Epidemiologic and laboratory features of a large outbreak of pertussis-like illnesses associated with cocirculating Bordetella holmesii and Bordetella pertussis--Ohio, 2010–2011. Clin Infect Dis 2013:56:322–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dinu S, Guillot S, Dragomirescu CC, Brun D, Lazăr Ş, Vancea G, et al. Whooping cough in South-East Romania: a 1-year study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2014;78:302–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
  • 12.Nikbin VS, Shahcheraghi F, Lotfi MN, Zahraei SM, Parzadeh M. Comparison of culture and real-time PCR for detection of Bordetella pertussis isolated from patients in Iran. Iran J Microbiol 2013;5:209–214. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mazengia E, Silva EA, Peppe JA, Timperi R, George H. Recovery of Bordetella holmesii from patients with pertussis-like symptoms: use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to characterize circulating strains. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2330–2333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mattoo S, Cherry JD. Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005;18:326–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Riffelmann M, Von König CW, Caro V, Guiso N, Group PPC Nucleic acid amplification tests for diagnosis of Bordetella infections. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:4925–4929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tizolova A, Guiso N, Guillot S. Insertion sequences shared by Bordetella species and implications for the biological diagnosis of pertussis syndrome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013;32:89–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.André P, Caro V, Njamkepo E, Wendelboe AM, Van Rie A, Guiso N. Comparison of serological and real-time PCR assays to diagnose Bordetella pertussis infection in 2007. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:1672–1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tatti KM, Sparks KN, Boney KO, Tondella ML. Novel multitarget real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of Bordetella species in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:4059–4066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ghanaie RM, Karimi A, Sadeghi H, Esteghamti A, Falah F, Armin S, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the world health organization pertussis clinical case definition. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14:e1072–e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang X, Weyrich LS, Lavine JS, Karanikas AT, Harvill ET. Lack of cross-protection against Bordetella holmesii after pertussis vaccination. Emerg Infect Dis 2012;18:1771–1779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roorda L, Buitenwerf J, Ossewaarde JM, van der Zee A. A real-time PCR assay with improved specificity for detection and discrimination of all clinically relevant Bordetella species by the presence and distribution of three Insertion Sequence elements. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grogan JA, Logan C, O’Leary J, Rush R, O’Sullivan N. Real-time PCR-based detection of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis in an Irish paediatric population. J Med Microbiol 2011;60:722–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pittet LF, Emonet S, François P, Bonetti E-J, Schrenzel J, Hug M, et al. Diagnosis of whooping cough in Switzerland: differentiating Bordetella pertussis from Bordetella holmesii by polymerase chain reaction. PloS one 2014;9:e88936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES