Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 11.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2017 Feb 1;27(6):1425–1427. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.01.093

Radiolabeling and initial biological evaluation of [18F]KBM-1 for imaging RAR-α receptors in neuroblastoma

Kiran Kumar Solingapuram Sai a,*, Bhaskar C Das a,*, Anirudh Sattiraju a, Frankis G Almaguel a, Suzanne Craft b, Akiva Mintz a,*
PMCID: PMC5724519  NIHMSID: NIHMS924469  PMID: 28216044

Abstract

Retinoic acid receptor alpha (RAR-α) plays a significant role in a number of diseases, including neuroblastoma. Children diagnosed with high-risk neuroblastoma are treated 13-cis-retinoic acid, which reduces risk of cancer recurrence. Neuroblastoma cell death is mediated via RAR-α, and expression of RAR-α is upregulated after treatment. A molecular imaging probe that binds RAR-α will help clinicians to diagnose and stratify risk for patients with neuroblastoma, who could benefit from retinoid-based therapy. In this study, we report the radiolabeling, and initial in vivo evaluation of [18F]KBM-1, a novel RAR-α agonist. The radiochemical synthesis of [18F]KBM-1 was carried out through KHF2 assisted substitution of [−18F] from aryl-substituted pinacolatoesters-based retinoid precursor. In vitro cell uptake assay in human neuroblastoma cell line showed that the uptake of [18F]KBM-1 was significantly inhibited by all three blocking agents (KBM-1, ATRA, BD4) at all the selected incubation times. Standard biodistribution in mice bearing neuroblastoma tumors demonstrated increased tumor uptake from 5 min to 60 min post radiotracer injection and the uptake ratios for target to non-target (tumor: muscle) increased 2.2-fold to 3.7-fold from 30 min to 60 min post injection. Tumor uptake in subset of 30 min blocking group was 1.7-fold lower than unblocked. These results demonstrate the potential utility of [18F]KBM-1 as a RAR-α imaging agent.

Keywords: Retinoic acid receptor alpha (RAR-α), All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), Biodistribution, Neuroblastoma


Retinoic acids (RA) exhibit various important biological functions in the control of normal growth, differentiation and fetal development.1,2 Their activity is mediated through retinoic acid receptors (RAR), which are ligand activated nuclear receptors.3,4 This receptor family consists of α, β, and γ subtypes; each subtype has multiple isoforms. Recent studies have demonstrated that both all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and 13-cis-retinoic acid (isotretinoin) promote morphological differentiation and inhibit growth of neuroblastoma cells, mainly through activation of RAR-α subtypes.5,6 Human neuroblastoma cell lines treated with ATRA differentiate in culture, forming neurites and exhibiting growth arrest. Haber et al. demonstrated that RAR-α expression was specifically induced in neuroblastoma cell lines by ATRA and other differentiating agents tested.7 RAR-α expression appears to be necessary for ATRA to have therapeutic effects on neuroblastoma cells in vitro.7 Furthermore, reduced expression of RAR-α in vivo may contribute to the process of neuroblastoma tumorigenesis and resistance to ATRA therapy.8 Although attempts have been made to measure RAR-α activity using neuroblastoma cell lines in vitro, no reliable in vivo clinically relevant probe exists to measure and quantify RAR-α expression.7 A RAR-α binding PET radiotracer could be a key tool to measure real-time RAR-α expression and elucidate effects of RAR-α on the pathogenesis of neuroblastoma.

Das et al. developed a novel boron-based RAR-α agonist (BD4) specifically for treatment of kidney diseases.9 They analyzed structure-activity relationships (SAR) derived from in vitro binding assays and demonstrated that 10-fold concentration of ATRA was required to induce a 50% competitive inhibition of BD4 binding to a GST-tagged RAR-α. This confirms that BD4 binds to RARα with a higher affinity than ATRA.9,10 Using BD4 as a lead structure, we designed an F-18 based PET tracer by replacing the boronic ester group with a borontrifluoride group.11 Here we report for the first time a novel radiolabeling procedure, and initial in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation of [18F]KBM-1 as a potential imaging probe for RAR-α in a murine model of neuroblastoma.

The precursor BD4 for the radiochemical reaction was synthesized following the previously reported method from aryl aldehyde derivative using Michael-Aldol and Witting reactions.9,1214 The non-radioactive standard KBM-1 was obtained from the precursor aryl bornic ester moiety BD4 using KF/KHF2 chemistry as previously reported.9,13,15 Radiochemical synthesis of [18F]KBM-1 was achieved by adding the precursor BD4 (200 mM) to the azeotropically dried [18F] residue followed by addition of 2 M HCl (6 μL) and 0.4 M KHF2 (1.0 μL) at a pH of ~3, using published methods (Scheme 1).1517 The reaction mixture was heated in a closed vial setup at 40 °C for 130 min. The final product was purified on silica gel chromatography using EtOH:NH4OH (95:5) as the eluent. The radiotracer [18F]KBM-1 was formulated with 0.9% NaCl solution and filtered through a 0.22 μm pyrogen-free Millipore filter. [18F] KBM-1 was produced in 6–8% decay corrected radiochemical yield in a total synthesis and formulation of 2.5 h (n = 6). The overall radiochemical purity was ~98% and the specific activity of the [18F]KBM-1 was ~1800–2000 mCi/μmol (decay corrected to end of synthesis).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Radiochemical synthesis of [18F]KBM-1.

We conducted in vitro cell uptake assays using SH-SY5Y cell line, a human neuroblastoma cell line previously reported to express RAR-α with and without the blocking agents to evaluate the specificity and binding efficiency of [18F]KBM-1.7,1821 The precursor molecule, BD4 has been reported to demonstrate high and specific binding towards RAR-α over ATRA. The fluorometric binding assay showed that BD4 binds specifically to RARα with an affinity of 14 ± 5 nM (KD) over ATRA.9 We used nonradioactive standard KBM1, ATRA, and precursor BD4 as blocking agents in our in vitro cell uptake assay. The uptake of [18F]KBM-1 was ~62% and 60% inhibited by non-radioactive KBM-1 as blocking agent, ~37% and 32% inhibited by ATRA as blocking agent, and ~58% and 51% inhibited by precursor BD4 as blocking agent after 15 min and 60 min incubation times respectively (Fig. 1). These findings indicate that [18F]KBM-1 uptake was significantly decreased in neuroblastoma cell lines with all three blocking agents (1) non-radioactive standard KBM-1, (2) ATRA, the widely used RAR-α targeting agent and (3) BD4, the previously published highly selective RAR-α ligand; thus demonstrating binding of [18F]KBM-1 to RAR-α.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

In vitro cell uptake of [18F]KBM-1 by at baseline and blockade conditions at 15 min and 60 min incubation time points. The data were expressed as % injected dose (ID)/mg of protein present in each well with p values ≤0.05 considered statistically significant (n = 6). All the blocking sections received 60-fold excess concentration of the blocking agent including, KBM-1, ATRA, and BD4 five min prior to the radiotracer addition.

We then conducted a biodistribution study with [18F]KBM-1 in male BALB/c mice with neuroblastoma tumors. Mice were grouped into three groups (n = 4) based on 5 min, 30 min and 60 min post injection (p.i). [18F]KBM-1 displayed rapid clearance from most of the major organs from 5 min to 60 min post injection (Fig. 2). The initial uptake at 5 min p.i in blood, kidney and liver was 4.37 ± 1.131, 26.22 ± 2.351 and 2.92 ± 0.209 (%ID/g) respectively. The uptake had mostly cleared by 60 min, with blood levels at 0.93 ± 0.512, kidney at 10.50 ± 1.509 and liver at 1.95 ± 0.233 (% ID/g) respectively. However, from 5 min to 60 min, bone uptake was constant or slightly increased-%ID/g of 1.65 ± 0.781 (5 min), 2.65 ± 0.112 (30 min) and 2.48 ± 0.131 (60 min), suggesting minor metabolic in vivo defluorination.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Biodistribution of [18F]KBM-1 in tumor-bearing mice (n = 4) after 5 min, 30 min and 60 min post injection. Results are expressed in % injected dose (ID)/g ± standard deviation, with p values ≤0.05 considered statistically significant.

Tumor uptake remained stable, while the uptake ratios for target to non-target (tumor: muscle) increased from 2.2-fold to 3.7-fold at 5 min to 60 min p.i respectively (Fig. 3). To demonstrate specific binding, we performed a blocking experiment in a subset of mice from the 30 min group (n = 2). The blocking agent was the nonradioactive KBM-1 (15 mg/kg) and was administered 15 min before the radiotracer injection. Tumor uptake in the 30 min blocking group was 1.7-fold lower than in the unblocked ones i.e., 0.80 ± 0.23 (%ID/g) versus 1.46 ± 0.81 in the unblocked group, demonstrating specificity for RAR-α receptors in the tumor (Table 1).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Ratio of target (tumor): nontarget (muscle) at 5 min, 30 min and 60 min post injection of [18F]KBM-1 in tumor bearing mice (n = 4).

Table 1.

Biodistribution of [18F]KBM-1 in tumor bearing mice (n = 3) at 30 min post injection, with and without blocking agent. Results are expressed in % injected dose (ID)/g ± standard deviation.

Organs 30 min-nonblockade 30 min-blockade
Brain 0.23 ± 0.09 0.15 ± 0.07
Heart 1.91 ± 1.12 1.70 ± 0.75
Blood 4.01 ± 2.31 2.91 ± 1.19
Lung 2.78 ± 0.77 2.88 ± 0.11
Liver 2.32 ± 0.22 2.44 ± 0.84
Pancreas 2.03 ± 1.23 2.13 ± 0.65
Kidneys 24.33 ± 2.36 20.43 ± 2.78
Tumor 1.46 ± 0.81 0.81 ± 0.23
Muscle 0.49 ± 0.11 0.40 ± 0.07
Bone 2.65 ± 1.12 3.18 ± 1.65

In conclusion, [18F]KBM-1 was synthesized for the first time using ArBF3/KHF2 chemistry with high radiochemical purity and specific activity. The in vitro cell uptake assay indicated that [18F] KBM-1 has the potential to serve as a RAR-α imaging agent. Initial in vivo biodistribution studies in BALB/c tumor-bearing mice demonstrate the potential of [18F]KBM-1 as a radiotracer for imaging neuroblastoma. Although we demonstrate novel radiochemistry and initial evaluation of [18F]KBM-1 binding in vitro and in vivo towards RAR-α, we are currently characterizing the complete receptor specificity, in vivo metabolic profile, kinetics and its performance in microPET imaging studies.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a pilot from Roena B. Kulynych Center for Memory and Cognition Research, the National Institute of Health (NIH) grant #1R01CA179072-01A1 (Mintz), P30 CA012197, the American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar grant # 124443-MRSG-13-121-01-CDD (Mintz), and the Translational Imaging Program (TIP) of the Wake Forest CTSA (UL1TR001420). We acknowledge the editorial assistance of Karen Klein, MA in the Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

References

  • 1.Boylan JF, Lufkin T, Achkar CC, Taneja R, Chambon P, Gudas LJ. Targeted disruption of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RAR alpha) and RAR gamma results in receptor-specific alterations in retinoic acid-mediated differentiation and retinoic acid metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:843–851. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Niederreither K, Dolle P. Retinoic acid in development: towards an integrated view. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:541–553. doi: 10.1038/nrg2340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chambon P. A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. FASEB J. 1996;10:940–954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chambon P. The retinoid signaling pathway: molecular and genetic analyses. Semin Cell Biol. 1994;5:115–125. doi: 10.1006/scel.1994.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dimberg A. The Role of Stat1 in Retinoic Acid-induced Myelomonocytic Differentiation of Human Leukemia Cells. 2002 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schapira M. Pharmacogenomics opportunities in nuclear receptor targeted cancer therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2002;2:243–256. doi: 10.2174/1568009023333845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marshall G, Cheung B, Stacey K, Norris M, Haber M. Regulation of retinoic acid receptor alpha expression in human neuroblastoma cell lines and tumor tissue. Anticancer Res. 1993;14:437–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu T, Bohlken A, Kuljaca S, et al. The retinoid anticancer signal: mechanisms of target gene regulation. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:310–318. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhong Y, Wu Y, Liu R, et al. Novel retinoic acid receptor alpha agonists for treatment of kidney disease. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Das BC, Smith ME, Kalpana GV. Design, synthesis of novel peptidomimetic derivatives of 4-HPR for rhabdoid tumors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:4177–4180. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.05.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Solingapuram Sai KK, Das B, Sattiraju A, Almaguel F, Craft S, Mintz A. Radiosynthesis and initial in vitro evaluations of [18F]KBM-1 as a potential RAR-α imaging agent. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1077. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Das BC, Mahalingam SM, Evans T, Kabalka GW, Anguiano J, Hema K. Design and synthesis of (E)-1-((3-ethyl-2,4,4-trimethylcyclohex-2-enylidene)methyl-4-substituted benzenes from 1-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enyl)ethanol. Chem Commun. 2009;16:2133–2135. doi: 10.1039/b823063c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goel S, Schinke C, Bhagat T, et al. Design and synthesis of novel derivatives of ATRA demonstrate the combined importance of acid moiety and conjugated double bonds in its binding to PMLRAR-alpha oncogene in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 2008;112:5036. doi: 10.3109/10428191003786766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schinke C, Goel S, Bhagat TD, et al. Design and synthesis of novel derivatives of all-trans retinoic acid demonstrate the combined importance of acid moiety and conjugated double bonds in its binding to PML–RAR-α oncogene in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia Lymphoma. 2010;51:1108–1114. doi: 10.3109/10428191003786766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ting R, Adam MJ, Ruth TJ, Perrin DM. Arylfluoroborates and alkylfluorosilicates as potential PET imaging agents: high-yielding aqueous biomolecular 18F-labeling. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:13094–13095. doi: 10.1021/ja053293a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ting R, Harwig C, auf dem Keller U, et al. Toward [18F]-labeled aryltrifluoroborate radiotracers: in vivo positron emission tomography imaging of stable aryltrifluoroborate clearance in mice. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12045–12055. doi: 10.1021/ja802734t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Z, Li Y, Lozada J, et al. Stoichiometric leverage: rapid 18F-aryltrifluoroborate radiosynthesis at high specific activity for click conjugation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:2303–2307. doi: 10.1002/anie.201208551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van der Leede BJM, van den Brink CE, Van der Saag PT. Retinoic acid receptor and retinoid X receptor expression in retinoic acid—resistant human tumor cell lines. Mol Carcinog. 1993;8:112–122. doi: 10.1002/mc.2940080208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Messi E, Florian MC, Caccia C, Zanisi M, Maggi R. Retinoic acid reduces human neuroblastoma cell migration and invasiveness: effects on DCX, LIS1, neurofilaments-68 and vimentin expression. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Encinas M, Iglesias M, Liu Y, et al. Sequential treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with retinoic acid and brain-derived neurotrophic factor gives rise to fully differentiated, neurotrophic factor-dependent, human neuron-like cells. J Neurochem. 2000;75:991–1003. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0750991.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xie H-R, Hu L-S, Li G-Y. SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line: in vitro cell model of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s disease. Chin Med J. 2010;123:1086–1092. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES