Skip to main content
BMC Research Notes logoLink to BMC Research Notes
. 2017 Dec 11;10:729. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3018-6

Central nervous system transcriptome of Biomphalaria alexandrina, an intermediate host for schistosomiasis

Tamer A Mansour 1,2, Mohamed R Habib 3, Laura C Vicente Rodríguez 4, Anthony Hernández Vázquez 4, Julián Maldonado Alers 4, Alfredo Ghezzi 5, Roger P Croll 6, C Titus Brown 1, Mark W Miller 4,
PMCID: PMC5725652  PMID: 29228974

Abstract

Objective

Globally, more than 200 million people live at risk of the neglected tropical disease schistosomiasis (or snail fever). Larval schistosomes require the presence of specific snail species that act as intermediate hosts, supporting their multiplication and transformation into forms that can infect humans. This project was designed to generate a transcriptome from the central nervous system (CNS) of Biomphalaria alexandrina, the major intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni in Egypt.

Results

A transcriptome was generated from five pooled central nervous systems dissected from uninfected specimens of B. alexandrina. Raw Illumina RNA-seq data (~ 20.3 million paired end reads of 150 base pairs length each) generated a transcriptome consisting of 144,213 transcript elements with an N50 contig size of 716 base pairs. Orthologs of 15,246 transcripts and homologs for an additional 16,810 transcripts were identified in the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database. The B. alexandrina CNS transcriptome provides a resource for future research exploring parasite-host interactions in a simpler nervous system. Moreover, increased understanding of the neural signaling mechanisms involved in the response of B. alexandrina to infection by S. mansoni larvae could lead to novel and highly specific strategies for the control of snail populations.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-017-3018-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Biomphalaria alexandrina, Schistosoma mansoni, CNS, Trematode, Gastropod, Mollusk, Nile

Introduction

Schistosomiasis remains one of the most prevalent neglected tropical diseases affecting human populations in many parts of Africa, Asia, and South America. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that more than 218 million people in 78 countries required preventive chemotherapy in 2015 [1]. The WHO has recommended a multifaceted strategic plan for control and prevention of schistosomiasis, including large-scale chemotherapy for high-risk populations, hygiene education, access to safe drinking water, and snail control [2].

Fresh water pulmonate snails from the genus Biomphalaria act as the obligatory intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni, the trematode species that causes intestinal schistosomiasis. A recent whole genome analysis for Biomphalaria glabrata, the major intermediate host in the Western Hemisphere, identified several potential targets for developing novel control measures [3]. In Egypt, where schistosomiasis dates to antiquity [46], Biomphalaria alexandrina is the predominant intermediate host for S. mansoni [79]. The presence of B. alexandrina is a key factor that determines the prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis in the country.

In 2016, the Ministry of Health and Population of Egypt (MoHP) and WHO conducted a mapping of S. mansoni infection in five Nile Delta governorates [10]. The results of this project showed that prevalence rates ranged from 4.7% in Qalyubia Governorate to 17.6% in Sharqia Governorate, with an average prevalence of 10.7% in the five governorates surveyed. These observations indicate that previous assessments may have underestimated the extent of infection.

Efforts to control snail populations, such as molluscicides or introduction of predator species, have yielded only modest results. One potential target to be considered for snail control is its central nervous system (CNS), since it regulates vital functions including cardiac activity, feeding and reproductive behavior. In the present investigation, a neural transcriptome was generated with the ultimate goal of identifying signaling mechanisms involved in the response of B. alexandrina to infection by S. mansoni larvae. Such mechanisms may lead to novel and highly specific strategies for the control of snail populations.

Main text

Methods

Sample collection and preparation

Specimens of B. alexandrina (Fig. 1a) used in the present study were descendants from a field population that was collected from Giza Governorate in Egypt in 2012 and shipped to the Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Canada. They were maintained under a 14:10 light–dark cycle and fed romaine lettuce ad libitum. The central nervous systems (Fig. 1b) were dissected, immediately submerged in RNAlater (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and stored at 4 °C for further analysis. Five pooled nervous systems were homogenized in lysis-binding solution provided in the RNAqueous-Micro Total RNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Total RNA was isolated following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer and its quality was verified with an agarose gel. Samples were then sent to the Genomic Sequencing and Analysis Facility (GSAF) at the University of Texas at Austin for library preparation and Illumina sequencing. PolyA RNA selection was implemented using the Poly(A)Purist MAG Kit (Life Technologies). The mRNA quality was assessed with an Agilent Bioanalyzer. A non-directional RNA-seq library (cDNA inserts of approximately 384 bp) was generated using NEBNext Module Components. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencer (Paired End 2 × 150 bp).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Source of RNA used to generate transcriptome. a Biomphalaria alexandrina specimen. Calibration bar: 1 mm. b Dissected central nervous system. B g., buccal ganglion; C g., cerebral ganglion; V g., visceral ganglion. Calibration bar: 200 μm

Transcriptome preprocessing, assembly and annotation

Quality based trimming was implemented using Trimmomatic v0.33 [11] followed by K-mer spectral analysis to remove low abundance K-mers using the Khmer 2.0 package [12]. FastQC v0.11.3 was used to check data quality before and after trimming [13]. Filtration of input sequences produced ~ 14.4 million paired end (PE) reads and ~ 5.4 million single end (SE) reads. High-quality fragments were pooled for de novo transcriptome assembly using Trinity v2.2.0 [14] producing 149,545 transcripts. Several filtration procedures were performed to clean up the assembly: SeqClean was used to trim poly-A tails and remove 38 low complexity sequences [15]. Custom scripts were used to remove 745 fragments smaller than 200 bp. Back-mapping of input sequencing reads to the assembly using Salmon software, allowed removal of 4526 uncovered isoforms [16]. Finally, scanning the new assembly against the UniVec Database containing vector and artificial sequences eliminated 23 transcripts and trimmed an additional 98 transcripts [17]. In total, all filtration steps excluded 5332 transcripts. The final assembly was composed of 144,213 isoforms that belong to 128,739 genes. The total assembly size was 82.7 Mb with N50 equal to 716 base pairs. (Assembly statistics: Table 1). To evaluate the quality of the final assembly, another round of back mapping of input sequencing reads to the assembly was performed. PE and SE reads showed mapping rates of about 96 and 89% respectively. For benchmarking, Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO v.2) software was used to assess annotation completeness against single-copy orthologs in Metazoa (978 orthologs) [18, 19]. BUSCO analysis was able to identify 79.5, 19.5, 1.1% complete, fragmented, and missing gene models. To assess expression abundance of assembled transcripts, mapped sequence reads were normalized into transcript per million scale (TPM) and logarithmic transformation of the normalized expression was plotted as a histogram (Fig. 2). Most of the transcripts had expression abundance levels around 1.5 TPM but only 848 transcripts had TPM values greater than 100 (Expression statistics: Table 2).

Table 1.

Transcriptome assembly statistics

Total trinity ‘genes’ 128739
Total trinity transcripts 144213
Maximum length 5634
Minimum length 201
Percent GC 36.75
Statistics based on ALL transcript contigs
 Contig N10 1986
 Contig N20 1459
 Contig N30 1128
 Contig N40 896
 Contig N50 716
 Median contig length 402
 Mean contig length 573
 Total assembled bases 82,672,833
Statistics based on LONGEST ISOFORM per “GENE”
 Contig N10 1797
 Contig N20 1298
 Contig N30 1001
 Contig N40 796
 Contig N50 636
 Median contig length 382
 Mean contig length 533
 Total assembled bases 68,601,167
Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Histogram of log TPM expression

Table 2.

Expression abundance statistics

Mean expression 6.93
Median expression 1.47
Maximum expression 27609
Isoforms with exp > 10 TPM 11187
Isoforms with exp > 100 TPM 848
Isoforms with exp > 1000 TPM 85
Isoforms with exp > 10000 TPM 3

For annotation, TransDecoder v2.0.1 was used to predict open reading frames (ORFs) [20]. A reciprocal BLAST search was implemented between the final assembly and target databases using BLAST plus v2.2.30. Significant BLAST hits (E-values < 10e−5) were utilized by crb-BLAST software to identify orthologous transcripts [21]. Transcripts with significant BLAST hits that failed to find a significant ortholog were annotated by the best BLAST hit as a candidate homolog.

Results

Annotation of all transcripts in the final assembly predicted 40,408 transcripts with long open reading frames (≥100 amino acids) (Additional file 1). Orthologs of 15,246 transcripts were identified by conditional BLAST search against the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database (Additional file 2). Homologs for an additional 16,810 transcripts were identified by the best BLAST hit against the same database (Additional file 3).

Each transcript in the FASTA file of the transcriptome was annotated with its transcript length and expression level in TPM values. Also, if identified, transcripts were annotated by their orthologs. Otherwise, annotation was implemented using homologs or with possible ORFs (Additional file 4).

Of the 848 highly expressed transcripts, approximately 49% corresponded to orthologs in the Swiss-Prot database. An additional 11% had homologs from a BLAST search against the same database. Another 17% had long ORFs, > 60% of which were complete, but failed to attain significant BLAST hit against the Swiss-Prot database. (Annotation Statistics: Table 3).

Table 3.

Annotation statistics

Total transcriptome (144,213 transcripts) Highly expressed (848 transcripts)
Count Percent Count Percent
Transcripts with long ORF 40408 28.02 336 39.62
Transcripts with complete long ORF 8678 6.02 258 30.42
Against Swiss-Prot database
 Significant BLAST match 32056 22.23 428 50.47
 Transcripts with orthologs 15246 10.57 336 39.62
 Transcripts with homologs 16810 11.66 92 10.85
 Transcripts with ORF but no BLAST hit 15161 10.51 145 17.10
Against (nr) BLAST database
 Significant BLAST match 542 63.92
 Transcripts with orthologs 469 55.31
 Transcripts with homologs 73 8.61
 Transcripts with ORF but no BLAST hit 61 7.19

The 848 highly expressed transcripts were selected for a second reciprocal BLAST search against the comprehensive NCBI Non-Redundant (NR) BLAST database. About 55% of transcripts were assigned an ortholog and 9% were annotated with a best homolog. Only 7% of the highly expressed transcripts had long ORF but failed to achieve a significant hit against the NR database. A new FASTA file for the highly expressed transcripts was annotated by the BLAST results against the NR database (Additional file 5). A reciprocal BLAST search against the recently published transcriptome of twelve pooled B. glabrata tissues [3] showed 22,613 orthologs with average identity 99.1% (Additional file 6).

Discussion

The relatively simple nervous systems of gastropod mollusks contain large identified neurons that allow detailed electrophysiological, biochemical, and molecular analyses at the cellular level [2224]. Gastropods therefore serve as promising models for neurobiological studies exploring the cellular basis of behavior, including sensorimotor integration [25, 26], central pattern generator (CPG) networks [27, 28], neuroendocrine regulation of reproduction [29, 30], and responses to parasitism [31, 32]. The transcriptome of the B. alexandrina CNS complements the whole genome characterization of B. glabrata [3], and provides a resource for future investigation of parasite-host interactions with biomedical implications in a highly tractable nervous system. This transcriptome should also lead to novel strategies directed toward snail control.

Limitations

Potential limitations may include:

  1. Short read sequencing can produce an incomplete gene model leading to inaccurate identification of multiple isoforms for the same gene.

  2. RNA preparation with Poly(A) selection allows us to enrich for non-ribosomal transcripts but also will result in loss of non-polyadenylated transcripts.

  3. Lack of biological and technical replicates.

Additional files

13104_2017_3018_MOESM1_ESM.fa (16.5MB, fa)

Additional file 1. Coding Transcripts: Transcripts with long open reading frames (≥100 amino acids).    

13104_2017_3018_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (1.4MB, xlsx)

Additional file 2. Orthologous Transcripts: Transcripts with significant mutual BLAST hits against the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database.

13104_2017_3018_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (1.6MB, xlsx)

Additional file 3. Homologous Transcripts: Transcripts with significant one-way BLAST hits against the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database.

13104_2017_3018_MOESM4_ESM.fasta (88.6MB, fasta)

Additional file 4. Final assembly: Transcripts annotated with transcript length and expression level in TPM values. Also, if identified, transcripts were annotated by their orthologs. Otherwise, annotation was implemented using homologs or with possible open reading frames.

13104_2017_3018_MOESM5_ESM.fasta (913.1KB, fasta)

Additional file 5. Hi-Express transcripts: Highly expressed transcripts annotated by the BLAST results against the comprehensive NCBI Non-Redundant (NR) database.

13104_2017_3018_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (1.9MB, xlsx)

Additional file 6. BLAST against B. glabrata: A reciprocal BLAST search against the recently published transcriptome of twelve pooled Biomphalaria glabrata tissues [3].

Authors’ contributions

TM, MRH, RPC, and MWM conceived and designed the experiments; LVR, AHV, and JMA performed the experiments; AG, TM, and CTB analyzed the data; MWM, MRH, LVR, CTB, and TM wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data used for assembly are deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Reads Archive (SRA) under Accession Number SRR5485617, associated with BioProject Number PRJNA384662 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2768753).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Protocols conducted on B. alexandrina were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Dalhousie University (Protocol #I13-06). Consent to participate: not applicable.

Funding

Support: Natural Sciences and Research Council (Canada): Discovery Grant 38863; National Institutes of Health (USA): RCMI MD007600, NIGMS-RISE R25 GM061838; National Science Foundation (USA): CREST HRD-1137725, PIRE OISE 1545803; National Academy of Sciences (NAS; USA): U.S.-Egypt Science and Technology (S&T) Joint Fund 2000007152; Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF, Egypt): USC17-188. This article is derived from the Subject Data funded in whole or part by NAS and USAID. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the authors alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or NAS.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abbreviations

BLAST

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

ORF

open reading frame

WHO

World Health Organization

B g.

buccal ganglion

C g.

cerebral ganglion

V g.

visceral ganglion

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-017-3018-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Contributor Information

Tamer A. Mansour, Email: drtamermansour@gmail.com

Mohamed R. Habib, Email: m_ramadanhabib@yahoo.com

Laura C. Vicente Rodríguez, Email: laura.vicente@upr.edu.

Anthony Hernández Vázquez, Email: anthony.hernandez9@upr.edu.

Julián Maldonado Alers, Email: julian.maldonado@upr.edu.

Alfredo Ghezzi, Email: alfredoghezzi@gmail.com.

Roger P. Croll, Email: roger.croll@dal.ca

C. Titus Brown, Email: titus@idyll.org.

Mark W. Miller, Phone: (787) 721-4462, Email: mark.miller@upr.edu

References

  • 1.WHO 2011. Report of an informal consultation on schistosomiasis control. Geneva, Switzerland. (WHO/HTM/NTD/PCT/2013.3). http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/resources/9789241505017/en/. Accessed 29 May 2017.
  • 2.WHO 2017. Schistosomiasis Fact Sheet N115. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs115/en/. 2017. Accessed 29 May 2017.
  • 3.Adema CM, Hillier LW, Jones CS, Loker ES, Knight M, et al. Whole genome analysis of a schistosomiasis-transmitting freshwater snail. Nat Commun. 2017;16(8):15451. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ruffer M. Note on the presence of ‘‘Bilharzia haematobia’’ in Egyptian mummies of the twentieth dynasty [1250-1000 B.C.] Br Med J. 1910;1:16. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.2557.16-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Contis G, David A. The epidemiology of Bilharzia in ancient Egypt: 5000 years of schistosomiasis. Parasitol Today. 1996;12:253–255. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(96)30007-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barakat RM. Epidemiology of schistosomiasis in Egypt: travel through time: review. J Adv Res. 2013;4(5):425–432. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lotfy WM, Dejong RJ, Abdel-Kader A, Loker ES. A molecular survey of Biomphalaria in Egypt: is B. glabrata present? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73(1):131–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lotfy WM, Dejong RJ, Black BS, Loker ES. Specific identification of Egyptian Biomphalaria species and possible hybrids using the polymerase chain reaction based on nuclear and mitochondrial loci. Mol Cell Probes. 2005;19(1):21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2004.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abou-El-Naga IF. Biomphalaria alexandrina in Egypt: past, present, and future. J Biosci. 2013;38(3):666–672. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9329-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haggag AA, Rabiee A, Abd Elaziz KM, Gabrielli AF, Abdel Hay R, Ramzy RM. Mapping of Schistosoma mansoni in the Nile Delta, Egypt: assessment of the prevalence by the circulating cathodic antigen urine assay. Acta Trop. 2017;167:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crusoe MR, Alameldin HF, Awad S, Boucher E, Caldwell A, Cartwright R, et al. The khmer software package: enabling efficient nucleotide sequence analysis. F1000Res. 2015;4:900. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6924.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed 29 May 2017.
  • 14.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Masoudi-Nejad A, Tonomura K, Kawashima S, Moriya Y, Suzuki M, Itoh M, Kanehisa M, Endo T, Goto S. EGassembler: online bioinformatics service for large-scale processing, clustering and assembling ESTs and genomic DNA fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Web Server issue):W459–W462. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast, and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14:417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.The UniVec Database. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/vecscreen/univec/. Accessed 29 May 2017.
  • 18.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(19):3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Creevey CJ, Muller J, Doerks T, Thompson JD, Arendt D, Bork P. Identifying single copy orthologs in Metazoa. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(12):e1002269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.TransDecoder. http://transdecoder.github.io. Accessed 29 May 2017.
  • 21.Aubry S, Kelly S, Kumpers BM, Smith-Unna RD, Hibberd JM. Deep evolutionary comparison of gene expression identifies parallel recruitment of trans-factors in two independent origins of C4 photosynthesis. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(6):e1004365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kandel ER. Cellular basis of behavior: an introduction to behavioral neurobiology. San Francisco: WH Freeman; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kandel ER. Behavioral biology of Aplysia. San Francisco: WH Freeman; 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chase RM. Behavior and its neural control in gastropod molluscs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Levi R, Varona P, Arshavsky YI, Rabinovich MI, Selverston AI. The role of sensory network dynamics in generating a motor program. J Neurosci. 2005;25(42):9807–9815. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2249-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Latorre R, Levi R, Varona P. Transformation of context-dependent sensory dynamics into motor behavior. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(2):e1002908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Getting PA. Emerging principles governing the operation of neural networks. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:1850204. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.001153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Katz PS, Frost WN. Intrinsic neuromodulation: altering neuronal circuits from within. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19(2):54–61. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(96)89621-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lever J, Boer HH, eds. Molluscan neuro-endocrinology. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1983.
  • 30.Koene JM. Neuro-endocrine control of reproduction in hermaphroditic freshwater snails: mechanisms and evolution. Front Behav Neurosci. 2010;4:167. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.de Jong-Brink M. How schistosomes profit from the stress responses they elicit in their hosts. Adv Parasitol. 1995;35:177–256. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60072-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hoek RM, van Kesteren RE, Smit AB, de Jong-Brink M, Geraerts WPM. Schistosome parasites directly induce changes in gene expression in the central nervous system of their molluscan host. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:14072–14076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.14072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

13104_2017_3018_MOESM1_ESM.fa (16.5MB, fa)

Additional file 1. Coding Transcripts: Transcripts with long open reading frames (≥100 amino acids).    

13104_2017_3018_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (1.4MB, xlsx)

Additional file 2. Orthologous Transcripts: Transcripts with significant mutual BLAST hits against the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database.

13104_2017_3018_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (1.6MB, xlsx)

Additional file 3. Homologous Transcripts: Transcripts with significant one-way BLAST hits against the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database.

13104_2017_3018_MOESM4_ESM.fasta (88.6MB, fasta)

Additional file 4. Final assembly: Transcripts annotated with transcript length and expression level in TPM values. Also, if identified, transcripts were annotated by their orthologs. Otherwise, annotation was implemented using homologs or with possible open reading frames.

13104_2017_3018_MOESM5_ESM.fasta (913.1KB, fasta)

Additional file 5. Hi-Express transcripts: Highly expressed transcripts annotated by the BLAST results against the comprehensive NCBI Non-Redundant (NR) database.

13104_2017_3018_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (1.9MB, xlsx)

Additional file 6. BLAST against B. glabrata: A reciprocal BLAST search against the recently published transcriptome of twelve pooled Biomphalaria glabrata tissues [3].

Data Availability Statement

The raw data used for assembly are deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Reads Archive (SRA) under Accession Number SRR5485617, associated with BioProject Number PRJNA384662 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX2768753).


Articles from BMC Research Notes are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES