Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anticancer Res. 2017 Dec;37(12):6989–6995. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12167

Primary Urinary Tract Lymphoma: Rare but Aggressive

Konstantinos Lontos 1, Anastasia Tsagianni 2, Pavlos Msaouel 3, Leonard Joseph Appleman 1, Dimitrios Nasioudis 4
PMCID: PMC5726395  NIHMSID: NIHMS924167  PMID: 29187485

Abstract

Background

Primary urinary tract lymphoma (PUTL) is an uncommon disease with only a few case reports in the literature.

Materials and Methods

Information about 1264 patients diagnosed between 1983 and 2013 with PUTL was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable regression analysis were used to analyze the survival and identify prognostic factors. A comparison of nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with PUTL DLBCL was performed. In addition, we compared the characteristics of kidney and bladder lymphoma.

Results

PUTL incidence was 1 case/1,000,000 people per year. DLBCL was found to be the predominant histology. 5-Year overall survival and cancer-specific survival were 49% and 58%, respectively. DLBCL histology, male gender, stage III–IV disease, and advanced age were found to be poor prognostic factors. Surgery may be beneficial. Urinary tract DLBCL has a worse prognosis than nodal DLBCL.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the largest population-based study of PUTL in the literature. The survival of patients has not improved in the era of modern therapies therefore new treatments are needed.

Keywords: Kidney lymphoma, renal lymphoma, bladder lymphoma


Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are hematological malignancies that can arise either from the lymph nodes (nodal) or other organs (extranodal). Based on an analysis of the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 72240 new cases of NHL will be diagnosed in 2017, while 20,140 people will die of the disease (1). Extranodal lymphoma comprises on average 25–35% of NHLs, with the most frequent sites being the skin, small intestine and stomach (2).

Primary urinary tract lymphoma (PUTL), first described in 1953 (3), is a very rare entity, with only a few case reports in the literature (4,5). Genitourinary tract NHLs represent 8.4% of extranodal lymphomas (6). To elucidate the demographic, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors of patients with PUTL, we performed a retrospective analysis using data deriving from a multi-institutional, population-based cancer database.

Materials and Methods

The SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute collects information on cancer incidence and survival from 18 registries (Alaska Native Tumor Registry, Arizona Indians, Cherokee Nation, Connecticut, Detroit, Georgia Center for Cancer Statistics, Greater Bay Are Cancer Registry, Greater California, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Los Angeles, Louisiana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Seattle-Puget Sound, Utah) (7). It covers approximately 28% of the current US population based on the 2010 census. The SEER data are de-identified and available to the public for research purposes.

Eligible cases of PUTL were identified using ICD-O-3 codes (9590/3–9823/3) and topographical codes (64.9–68.9) from 1983 to 2013. Disease of the prostate was excluded as it is part of the male reproductive system. Patients diagnosed before 1983 were excluded due to unavailability of staging information according to the Ann Arbor system. Moreover, cases without active follow-up (diagnosis obtained from autopsy or death certificates), unknown Ann-Arbor stage, and those without histological confirmation of the disease were excluded. Demographic, clinical and pathological findings, and survival data were exported from the database using the case-listing option. The primary site was classified as either kidney, renal pelvis, ureter, or bladder. Treatment characteristics of patients with PUTL (administration of radiation therapy and performance of cancer-directed surgery) were also extracted. Unfortunately, the SEER database does not provide data on the administration of chemotherapy. In general, the captured treatment data exhibit low sensitivity but high positive predictive value (8). Following the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI prognostic model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (9), patients were categorized into three age groups, <60, 60–75 and >75 years old. Cases were also dichotomized based on the year of diagnosis; 2000 was used as a cut-off as in December of 2000 the first landmark study on the addition of rituximab to standard chemotherapy was presented at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Meeting (10). In addition, according to an epidemiological study, the use of rituximab before that date was infrequent (11). For comparison of survival with nodal DLBCL, additional cases were extracted using the 9680/3 code and the NHL – Nodal ‘Site recode ICD-O-3/WHO 2008’ category. Similar exclusion criteria were applied as described above.

The SEER database records survival as the number of months elapsed from the day of tumor diagnosis to the day of death or last contact. For the estimation of cancer-specific survival (CSS), only death attributable to the lymphoma was considered to be an event. To prevent confounding, we excluded patients diagnosed with more than one primary tumor from the survival analysis. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to identify independent predictors of cancer-specific mortality. Cases with missing data for one or more of the variables were excluded from the multivariable regression analysis. To allow adequate power for the Kaplan–Meier curves and the Cox model, kidney cases were grouped with renal pelvis cases, whereas ureter cases were grouped with bladder cases. We did not use this grouping when presenting descriptive statistics or for the comparison between kidney and bladder lymphoma. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 24 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Incidence data and trends were calculated through SEER*Stat Version 8.3.4 (12), using all 18 registries from 2000 to 2014. Chi-square tests were utilized to compare categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U-test and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to compare continuous variables.

Results

Incidence

The age-adjusted incidence rate of PUTL was calculated to be 1 case/1,000,000 people per year in the US population. The yearly incidence of kidney lymphoma was 0.7 cases while that of bladder lymphoma was 0.3. Trends in yearly changes were examined and no site was proven to have a statically significant annual percentage change. Among different races, Hispanics, Asians/Pacific Islanders and Whites exhibited the highest annual incidence rates (1.6, 1.6 and 1.1, respectively) while Blacks and American Indians/American Natives exhibited the lowest (0.7 and 0.4, respectively).

Demographics, histology and clinical characteristics

A total of 1264 eligible cases of PUTL diagnosed between 1983 and 2013 were identified. Patient demographics and clinicopathological characteristics are listed in Table I. The OS and CSS at 5 years were 49% and 58%, respectively. There was a slight male predominance (57%). Median age at presentation was 71 years, with only 24% of cases occurring in patients younger than 60 years old. Most patients were White (78.3%) and 77% were diagnosed after 2001. The predominant site of involvement was the kidney (70.8%). The most frequently encountered stage at presentation was stage I (40% of cases), followed by stage IV (32% of cases).

Table I.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with primary urinary tract lymphoma (n=1264).

Characteristic Subgroup n (%)
Age <60 Years 309 (24%)
60–75 Years 507 (40%)
>75 Years 448 (36%)
Race White 989 (78.3%)
Black 90 (7.2%)
Hispanic 101 (8%)
American Indian/Alaskan 4 (0.3%)
Asian or Pacific Islander 77 (6%)
Unknown 3 (0.2%)
Marital status Married 693 (55%)
Single 179 (14%)
Widowed 251 (20%)
Divorced 95 (7%)
Unknown 46 (4%)
Year of diagnosis Before 2000 293 (23%)
2000 On 971 (77%)
Site Kidney 896 (70.8%)
Pelvis 22 (1.7%)
Ureter 20 (1.6%)
Bladder 326 (25.9%)
Ann-Arbor stage I 500 (40%)
II 279 (22%)
III 78 (6%)
IV 407 (32%)
Cancer-directed surgery Yes 732 (57.9%)
No 529 (41.9%)
Unknown 3 (0.2%)
Radiation Yes 143 (11.3%)
No 1103 (87.3%)
Unknown 18 (1.4%)
Treatment Surgery only 442 (35%)
Radiation only 64 (5.1%)
Both 79 (6.2%)
Unknown 19 (1.5%)
Neither 660 (52.2%)
Type of lymphoma DLBCL 656 (51.9%)
MALT 158 (12.5%)
Follicular 119 (9.4%)
NHL, NOS 118 (9.3%)
Malignant lymphoma, NOS 68 (5.4%)
CLL 57 (4.5%)
Burkitt 31 (2.5%)
Other NHL, B-cell 29 (2.3%)
Hodgkin 11 (0.9%)
Other lymphomas 10 (0.8%)
Other NHL, T-cell 7 (0.5%)
Gender Female 540 (43%)
Male 724 (57%)

Abbreviations: DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MALT, mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue; NHL, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; NOS, not otherwise specified; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Stratification by age according to NCCN-IPI demonstrated well-separated survival Kaplan–Meier curves (Figure 1, p<0.001). The 5-year CSS for patients <60 years old was 65%, for these aged 60–75 years 58% and for those >75 years 51%. The 5-year CSS was 69%, 58%, 53% and 47% for stage I, II, III and IV, respectively (Figure 2, p<0.001). The majority of cases did not receive radiation therapy or undergo cancer-directed surgery (52.2%), while 35% of the patients only underwent cancer-directed surgery, 5.1% received only radiation therapy, and 6.2% had multimodal treatment (radiation therapy combined with cancer-directed surgery).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cancer-specific survival of patients with primary urinary tract lymphoma stratified by age (N=846, p<0.001). 5-Year cancer-specific survival was 65%, 58% and 51% for those aged <60, 60–75 and >75 years, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cancer-specific survival of patients with primary urinary tract lymphoma (PLUT) stratified by stage (N=846, p<0.001). 5-year cancer-specific survival was 69%, 58%, 53% and 47% for patients with stage I, II, III and IV disease, respectively.

In terms of histology, the three most prevalent types of PUTL were DLBCL (51.9%) followed by marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (12.5%) and follicular lymphoma (9.4%). Five-year CSS rates were 56% for patients diagnosed with Burkitt lymphoma, 78% for those with chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma, 51% for those with DLBCL, 71% for those with follicular and 88% for those with MALT (Figure 3, p<0.001). The incidence of most types of PUTL peaked among patients in their 70s (median age of 71 years for DLBCL and follicular lymphoma, 71.5 years for MALT, and 73 years for CLL), with the exception of Burkitt lymphoma which had a median age of 41 years (p<0.001).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cancer-specific survival of patients with primary urinary tract lymphoma stratified by histology (N=846, p≤0.001). 5-Year cancer-specific survival was 56%, 78%, 51%, 71% and 88% for patients with Burkitt lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL.), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT), respectively.

Multivariable analyses are presented in Table II. Variables that were included were age, race, treatment, site, stage, year, gender and type of lymphoma. Older age groups had worse CCS. Male gender also conferred a worse prognosis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13–1.94], whereas race did not affect the outcomes. Compared with stage III–IV, patients with stage I disease had better CSS. Stage II did not reach statistical significance. Cancer-directed surgery and multimodal treatment (surgery plus radiation therapy) were associated with a mortality benefit, while the administration of radiation therapy alone did not improve outcomes. DLBCL carried the worst prognosis, with follicular and MALT lymphomas demonstrating better outcomes. There was no clear benefit of improved survival in the rituximab era (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.60–1.07)

Table II.

Cox proportional hazards model for cancer-specific survival in patients with primary urinary tract lymphoma.

Variable Hazard ratio 95% CI p-Value
Histology DLBCL Referent -
Follicular 0.48 0.31–0.74 0.001
MALT 0.16 0.08–0.33 0.000
Gender Female Referent -
Male 1.48 1.13–1.94 0.004
Year 1983–2000 Referent -
2001–2013 0.80 0.60–1.07 0.138
Stage I 0.55 0.40–0.76 .000
II 0.73 0.53–1.01 .06
III–IV Referent -
Site Bladder Referent -
Kidney 0.77 0.55–1.07 0.117
Treatment No Radiation or Surgery Referent -
Only Surgery 0.70 0.53–0.93 0.015
Only Radiation 0.84 0.49–1.43 0.515
Surgery and Radiation 0.41 0.22–0.77 0.005
Race Non-White Referent -
White 0.90 0.66–1.23 0.513
Age <60 Referent -
60–75 1.97 1.40–2.78 0.000
>75 2.72 1.91–3.90 0.000

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MALT, mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue

Bladder versus kidney lymphoma

The majority of patients with bladder lymphoma were female (58.7%) whereas the majority with lymphoma of the kidney were male (63.3%) (<0.001). Moreover, most bladder lymphomas were diagnosed at stage I (61.3%) compared to only 31.4% of kidney lymphomas (p<0.001). MALT lymphomas were more common in the bladder (22.7% vs. 12.7%, p<0.001). Patients with bladder lymphomas received more interventions (surgery 61% vs. 33.8%, radiation 22% vs. 7.3%, p<0.001). 5-Year CCS rates were 63% and 56% for patients with bladder and kidney lymphoma, respectively (p = 0.117). There was no significant difference in CSS between the two groups. A detailed comparison of demographic, clinicopathological and survival data between the two sites is presented in Table III.

Table III.

Comparison of patients with bladder versus kidney primary urinary tract lymphoma

Characteristic Bladder Kidney p-Value
Age, years Median 76 70 <0.001
Sex, n (%) Female 58.7% 36.7% <0.001
Male 41.3% 63.3%
Stage, n (%) I 61.3% 31.4% <0.001
II 14.7% 24.8%
III 4.6% 6.8%
IV 19.4% 37%
Histology, n (%) DLBCL 60.3% 65.8% <0.001
Follicular 7.1% 13.4%
MALT 22.7% 12.7%
Burkitt 2.1% 3.4%
CLL 7.8% 4.7%
Treatment, n (%) No surgery or radiation 32.9% 52.2% <0.001
Only surgery 43.9% 31.6%
Only radiation 4.9% 5.1%
Surgery and radiation 17.1% 2.2%
Unknown 1.2% 1.6%

Abbreviations: DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MALT, mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue; NHL, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Comparison of PUTL with nodal DLBCL

As DLBCL was the most common type of PUTL, 47,437 cases of microscopically confirmed nodal DLBCL were extracted from the SEER database (1983–2013). Following stratification by Ann-Arbor stage, patients with early-stage disease (stage I–II) and nodal DLBCL had 5-year CCS of 69% compared with 59% in patients with urinary tract DLBCL lymphoma (Figure 4A, p<0.001). Similarly, among patients with late stage disease (stage III–IV), urinary tract DLBCL had worse 5-year CSS (39% vs. 46%) compared with nodal DLBCL (Figure 4B, p= 0.03). Multivariable analyses controlling for year of diagnosis, gender, disease stage, patient age and race showed that patients with urinary tract DLBCL had worse CSS compared with patients with nodal DLBCL (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.10–1.44).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cancer-specific survival of patients with stage I–II (N=19173, p<0.001) (A) and stage III–IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (N=28731, p=0.03) (B) stratified by site. 5-Year cancer-specific survival for patients with nodal and urinary tract diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was 69% and 59% for those with stage I–II and 46% and 39%, respectively, for those with stage II–IV disease.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale population study of PUTL with >1000 cases from several registries across the USA. Although the urinary tract does not have any organized lymphoid tissue, PUTL may originate from lymphoid cells attracted to the area from recurrent infections (4,5). This hypothesis is supported by regression of some lymphomas in other parenchymal organs after the use of antibiotics, particularly MALT-associated lymphomas (13). In addition, the observation that bladder lymphomas occur more frequently in women than men could support the above theory since women experience cystitis more frequently than men. Moreover, higher frequency of MALT-associated lymphoma, which is commonly associated with bacterial infections (13), was noted in the bladder. A previous study failed to demonstrate an association between kidney lymphoma and Epstein-Barr virus infection (14). The most frequent symptoms in patients with kidney lymphoma are fever, weight loss, flank or abdominal pain, and hematuria (4), whereas the most frequent symptoms in bladder lymphomas are hematuria and recurrent urinary tract infections (5). Patients can have a flank mass on physical examination and may often present with acute kidney injury from renal parenchymal involvement or obstruction (15). While the differential diagnosis of lymphoma from other more common malignancies of the urinary tract can be difficult based solely on imaging, a small-scale study with 12 patients suggested that in contrast to most types of renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma usually has a high fludeoxyglucose uptake on positron-emission tomography scan (16). The use of percutaneous biopsy can safely and accurately provide histological diagnosis (17) and lead to early identification of kidney lymphoma. For bladder masses, cystoscopy with tissue biopsy can provide an accurate diagnosis (18).

Our data suggest that surgical treatment may be beneficial in patients with PUTL. This is notable, given that the mainstays of nodal DLBCL therapy are chemotherapy and radiation therapy (19). Surgery was most likely implemented for diagnostic purposes in the majority of patients, but it is possible that tumor debulking may produce survival benefit. Of note, Kim et al. similarly found that intestinal lymphoma benefits from surgery (20). Another study found that the most likely lymphoma to respond to local therapies is MALT-associated lymphoma of the bladder, which can recede even with administration of antibiotics (21). Surgery is occasionally used for MALT-associated lymphomas (22) but given that the analysis was multivariable and that DLBCL was the predominant form, the benefit should have been shared across all cases.

With regards to radiation therapy, it should be noted that the limitations of SEER radiation data can confound interpretation. The International Lymphoma Radiation Group includes in their guidelines “pelvic lymphoma involving bladder or gynecologic organs” and advises in favor of the use of radiation therapy. However, it does not outline any specific indications for lymphomas originating from the kidneys (23). In terms of chemotherapy, based on an analysis of the SEER database, Olsewski et al. argued that the location of extranodal NHL is critical for the effect of rituximab on the therapy, and that survival of patients with genitourinary lymphomas has not shown an improvement in the rituximab era (24). Our data are in agreement with this finding, however, the assumptions that after 2000 almost everybody received rituximab and that only the introduction of rituximab affected the survival are significant limitations.

Extranodal lymphoma has been shown to have worse prognosis than nodal (especially for DLBCL) depending on the tumor location. Castillo et al. demonstrated that gastrointestinal, pulmonary and liver/pancreas DLBCL carry a worse prognosis than nodal (6). In our analysis, after controlling for gender, patient age and race, disease stage and year of diagnosis, we showed for the first time that PUTL of DLBCL type is associated with worse CSS compared with primary nodal DLBCL in both early (I–II) and late (III–IV) stages. This could potentially be explained by the comorbidities that are caused by mass effect in the urinary tract (hydronephrosis) and infiltration of the renal parenchyma which leads to acute kidney injury. Any type of kidney injury in patients with cancer is associated with worse outcomes (25).

When comparing kidney with bladder lymphoma, a few differences were noted. Patients with bladder lymphoma were mainly female whereas those with kidney lymphoma were mainly male. Moreover, a higher frequency of MALT-associated lymphoma was noted in the bladder, which according to the literature is most commonly associated with bacterial infections (13). Contrary to kidney lymphoma, the majority of the bladder lymphomas were diagnosed at stage I. A possible explanation is the fact that bladder lymphoma gives rise to symptoms faster, mainly hematuria (5). More patients with bladder lymphoma underwent surgery and received radiation, which can be interpreted as being a result of the greater accessibility of the area for excisional biopsy when compared to the kidney. After controlling for multiple variables, no mortality difference was noted between the two sites. Finally, our data clearly disagree with the literature on the most common lymphoma of the bladder as it was found to be DLBCL and not MALT-associated as mentioned before (26).

Among the three most prevalent PUTL histology subtypes in our analysis, DLBCL carried the worse prognosis, whereas patients diagnosed with MALT-associated lymphoma had the best prognosis. Female gender was also independently associated with better survival. Similar data have been reported for B-cell lymphomas in the era of rituximab but were not noticed before supporting the fact that women may respond better to rituximab (27,28). Age as categorized by NCCN-IPI (9) also has prognostic value for patients with PUTL.

The major strength of our study is the large number of patients (>1000) from a multi-institutional database that spans more than 30 years, minimizing selection bias. Limitations include the lack of information about chemotherapy regimens and the low quality of information on radiation treatment. Moreover, due to the lack of central pathology review, possible tumor misclassification cannot be excluded. It should be noted that the distinction between advanced-stage primary extranodal and nodal lymphoma can be challenging given that nodal disease can involve extranodal sites as it progresses (29). Different definitions can often alter the results of these studies (30). We propose the creation of an international multi-center clinical database that can further elucidate and verify our findings. Already, efforts from the International Extranodal Study Group have delineated the behavior and clarified the treatment of other rare types of extranodal lymphomas (3133).

In summary, our study is the first to provide a detailed description of the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with PUTL. We found that primary urinary tract DLBCL carries a worse prognosis than nodal DBLCL in both early and late stages. In addition, surgery may be beneficial for patients with PUTL. The survival of patients with PUTL in the past two decades has not improved significantly despite the introduction of modern therapies such as rituximab. Therefore, better therapies are needed.

Acknowledgments

Pavlos Msaouel is supported by the National Institutes of Health T32 CA009666 grant. Leonard Joseph Appleman is supported by the National Institutes of Health P30-CA47904 and UM1 CA186690-01.

References

  • 1. [Accessed 05/2016]; https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/nhl.html.
  • 2.Newton R, Ferlay J, Beral V, Devesa SS. The epidemiology of non-hodgkin’s lymphoma: Comparison of nodal and extra-nodal sites. Int J Cancer. 1997;72(6):923–930. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970917)72:6<923::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jacobs A, Symington T. Primary lymphosarcoma of urinary bladder. Br J Urol. 1953;25(2):119–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1953.tb09253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen X, Hu D, Fang L, Chen Y, Che X, Tao J, Weng G, Ye X. Primary renal lymphoma: A case report and literature review. Oncol Lett. 2016;12(5):4001–4008. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simpson WG, Lopez A, Babbar P, Payne LF. Primary bladder lymphoma, diffuse large b-cell type: Case report and literature review of 26 cases. Urol Ann. 2015;7(2):268–272. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.152947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Castillo JJ, Winer ES, Olszewski AJ. Sites of extranodal involvement are prognostic in patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: An analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results database. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(3):310–314. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. [Accessed 05/2017]; https://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html.
  • 8.Noone AM, Lund JL, Mariotto A, Cronin K, McNeel T, Deapen D, Warren JL. Comparison of seer treatment data with medicare claims. Med Care. 2016;54(9):e55–64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou Z, Sehn LH, Rademaker AW, Gordon LI, Lacasce AS, Crosby-Thompson A, Vanderplas A, Zelenetz AD, Abel GA, Rodriguez MA, Nademanee A, Kaminski MS, Czuczman MS, Millenson M, Niland J, Gascoyne RD, Connors JM, Friedberg JW, Winter JN. An enhanced international prognostic index (nccn-ipi) for patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era. Blood. 2014;123(6):837–842. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-524108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, Bouabdallah R, Morel P, Van Den Neste E, Salles G, Gaulard P, Reyes F, Lederlin P, Gisselbrecht C. Chop chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with chop alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-b-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(4):235–242. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cronin DP, Harlan LC, Clegg LX, Stevens JL, Yuan G, Davis TA. Patterns of care in a population-based random sample of patients diagnosed with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematol Oncol. 2005;23(2):73–81. doi: 10.1002/hon.747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute SEER*Stat software version 8.3.4. http://www.seer.cancer.gov/seerstat.
  • 13.Raderer M, Kiesewetter B, Ferreri AJ. Clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (malt lymphoma) CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):153–171. doi: 10.3322/caac.21330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yasunaga Y, Hoshida Y, Hashimoto M, Miki T, Okuyama A, Aozasa K. Malignant lymphoma of the kidney. J Surg Oncol. 1997;64(3):207–211. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199703)64:3<207::aid-jso6>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Al-Salam S, Shaaban A, Alketbi M, Haq NU, Abouchacra S. Acute kidney injury secondary to renal large b-cell lymphoma: Role of early renal biopsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43(1):237–240. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9728-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye XH, Chen LH, Wu HB, Feng J, Zhou WL, Yang RM, Bu ZB, Ding Y, Guan J, Wang QS. 18f-fdg pet/ct evaluation of lymphoma with renal involvement: Comparison with renal carcinoma. South Med J. 2010;103(7):642–649. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181e23cb0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Caoili EM, Davenport MS. Role of percutaneous needle biopsy for renal masses. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014;31(1):20–26. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Satoh E, Miyao N, Tachiki H, Fujisawa Y. Prediction of muscle invasion of bladder cancer by cystoscopy. Eur Urol. 2002;41(2):178–181. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(01)00035-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Armitage JO. How i treat patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2007;110(1):29–36. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-01-041871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim SJ, Kang HJ, Kim JS, Oh SY, Choi CW, Lee SI, Won JH, Kim MK, Kwon JH, Mun YC, Kwak JY, Kwon JM, Hwang IG, Kim HJ, Park J, Oh S, Huh J, Ko YH, Suh C, Kim WS. Comparison of treatment strategies for patients with intestinal diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: Surgical resection followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Blood. 2011;117(6):1958–1965. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-288480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hughes M, Morrison A, Jackson R. Primary bladder lymphoma: Management and outcome of 12 patients with a review of the literature. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005;46(6):873–877. doi: 10.1080/10428190500079829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.NCCN Clinical Guidelines in Oncology. [Accessed 05/2017];B-Cell Lymphomas. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/b-cell.pdf.
  • 23.Yahalom J, Illidge T, Specht L, Hoppe RT, Li YX, Tsang R, Wirth A International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology G. Modern radiation therapy for extranodal lymphomas: Field and dose guidelines from the international lymphoma radiation oncology group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92(1):11–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Olszewski AJ, Winer ES, Castillo JJ. Improved survival with rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with extranodal diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. Leuk Res. 2014;38(8):866–873. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rosner MH, Perazella MA. Acute kidney injury in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1770–1781. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1613984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kempton CL, Kurtin PJ, Inwards DJ, Wollan P, Bostwick DG. Malignant lymphoma of the bladder: Evidence from 36 cases that low-grade lymphoma of the malt-type is the most common primary bladder lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(11):1324–1333. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199711000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Riihijarvi S, Taskinen M, Jerkeman M, Leppa S. Male gender is an adverse prognostic factor in b-cell lymphoma patients treated with immunochemotherapy. Eur J Haematol. 2011;86(2):124–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2010.01541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ngo L, Hee SW, Lim LC, Tao M, Quek R, Yap SP, Loong EL, Sng I, Hwan-Cheong TL, Ang MK, Ngeow J, Tham CK, Tan MH, Lim ST. Prognostic factors in patients with diffuse large b cell lymphoma: Before and after the introduction of rituximab. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49(3):462–469. doi: 10.1080/10428190701809156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yunus SA, Usmani SZ, Ahmad S, Shahid Z. Renal involvement in non-hodgkin’s lymphoma: The shaukat khanum experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007;8(2):249–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Krol AD, le Cessie S, Snijder S, Kluin-Nelemans JC, Kluin PM, Noordijk EM. Primary extranodal non-hodgkin’s lymphoma (nhl): The impact of alternative definitions tested in the comprehensive cancer centre west population-based nhl registry. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(1):131–139. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ryan G, Martinelli G, Kuper-Hommel M, Tsang R, Pruneri G, Yuen K, Roos D, Lennard A, Devizzi L, Crabb S, Hossfeld D, Pratt G, Dell’Olio M, Choo SP, Bociek RG, Radford J, Lade S, Gianni AM, Zucca E, Cavalli F, Seymour JF International Extranodal Lymphoma Study G. Primary diffuse large b-cell lymphoma of the breast: Prognostic factors and outcomes of a study by the international extranodal lymphoma study group. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(2):233–241. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sammassimo S, Pruneri G, Andreola G, Montoro J, Steffanoni S, Nowakowski GS, Gandini S, Negri M, Habermann TM, Raderer M, Li ZM, Zinzani PL, Adam P, Zucca E, Martinelli G. A retrospective international study on primary extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of the lung (balt lymphoma) on behalf of international extranodal lymphoma study group (ielsg) Hematol Oncol. 2016;34(4):177–183. doi: 10.1002/hon.2243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Govi S, Christie D, Mappa S, Marturano E, Bruno-Ventre M, Messina C, Medina EA, Porter D, Radford J, Heo DS, Park Y, Pro B, Jayamohan J, Pavlakis N, Zucca E, Gospodarowicz M, Ferreri AJ International Extranodal Lymphoma Study G. The clinical features, management and prognosis of primary and secondary indolent lymphoma of the bone: A retrospective study of the international extranodal lymphoma study group (ielsg #14 study) Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55(8):1796–1799. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.853298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES