Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Dec 12;7:17464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17593-7

Impact of treatment on resting cerebral blood flow and metabolism in obsessive compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis

A L van der Straten 1,2,3,4,✉, D Denys 1,2,3,4, G A van Wingen 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC5727319  PMID: 29234089

Abstract

Neurobiological models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) posit that its clinical symptoms such as repetitive thoughts and behaviors are related to hyperactivity in the cortico–striato–thalamo–cortical (CSTC) circuit. Small scale neuroimaging studies have shown that treatment of OCD is associated with reduced activity across different brain structures within this circuitry. We performed the first meta-analysis of positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies that investigated cerebral blood flow or glucose metabolism in patients with OCD before and after pharmacological or psychological treatment. We calculated standardized mean differences for the regions-of-interest most often reported. The meta-analysis revealed small reductions in activity in the caudate nucleus and orbitofrontal cortex after treatment with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor or cognitive behavioral therapy. Small reductions were also observed in the thalamus when one SPECT study with a large opposite effect was excluded from the analysis. Meta-regression analyses for the caudate nucleus showed no significant effect of the type of treatment, decrease in symptom severity, mean duration until the follow-up scan, or year of publication. These results show that pharmacological and psychological treatments reduce resting CSTC circuit activity, and provide further support for the CSTC circuit model in OCD.

Introduction

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that occurs in 2–3% of the general population1. OCD is characterized by repetitive thoughts (obsessions) and repetitive behaviors (compulsions). Compulsions such as washing, cleaning or counting occupy the patients for the entire day rendering them incapable of the routine chores of everyday life. Patients with OCD initially receive pharmacological treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or psychological treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). If the patients do not benefit sufficiently from these treatments, the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine or addition with antipsychotics are prescribed2. Symptom reduction, often quantified with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), is the primary measure of success in the treatment of OCD3. Neuroimaging studies have implicated the cortico–striato–thalamo–cortical (CSTC) circuit in the pathophysiology of OCD. A disbalance between ventral and dorsal CSTC circuits is thought to lead to increased anxiety, repetitive behaviors and the inability to modulate responses4. The main aim of functional neuroimaging studies investigating the effects of treatment is assessing changes in brain activity between a pre- and post-treatment scan. Imaging techniques that have been used most often are 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). FDG-PET and SPECT are both measures of neural activity at rest. fMRI typically measures neural responses to emotional and cognitive challenges that vary substantially across studies, which hampers pooling of those studies for meta-analysis. Our analysis will therefore focus on the resting nuclear neuroimaging studies that have been conducted in OCD.

FDG-PET is an imaging technique that measures the local cerebral metabolic rates for glucose (LCMRglc). The most common finding in FDG-PET studies in patients with OCD is decreased LCMRglc in the caudate nucleus after treatment5–9. Others found changes in glucose metabolism in the thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex or orbitofrontal cortex8,10–12. The finding of increased glucose metabolism in the caudate nucleus after successful treatment is in conflict with the other studies13. Technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene-amine-oxime (HMPAO) and xenon (Xe-) SPECT techniques measure the cerebral regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Studies using these techniques report changes in the rCBF after treatment in the caudate nucleus, putamen, thalamus, orbitofrontal cortex and prefrontal cortex14–19. Results indicating that pharmacotherapy was associated with an increased rCBF in the thalamus differed from these earlier studies20.

The majority of studies reviewed above have pointed towards a reduction of activity in at least one of the brain regions that are part of the CSTC circuit. However, the particular brain regions implicated vary across studies, suggesting more heterogeneity of the results than what is immediately apparent. Moreover, the results of those studies are typically based on small sample sizes, limiting the generalizability of the findings from the individual studies. To overcome these limitations, we performed the first meta-analysis of studies that have assessed resting cerebral blood flow or glucose metabolism in patients with OCD before and after pharmacological or psychological treatment. To explore whether variability in the study methods (e.g., type of therapy) and patient characteristics (e.g., level of symptom improvement) could explain variability in the results, we performed additional meta-regressions.

Methods

Literature search and study selection

We searched the Cochrane, PubMed and Psych INFO databases between January 1990 and July 2017 using the following search terms: (cognitive behavioral therapy OR serotonin reuptake inhibitor OR sertraline OR fluvoxamine OR clomipramine OR fluoxetine OR paroxetine OR (es)citalopram) AND (positron-emission tomography OR single-photon emission computed tomography OR glucose metabolism OR regional cerebral blood flow) AND obsessive compulsive disorder. We also manually searched reference lists of published review articles. All retrieved studies subsequently underwent a selection process consisting of reading the articles’ methods sections and applying the following inclusion criteria: (i) Diagnosis: participants of all ages with OCD according to DSM, (ii) Treatment: CBT, an SSRI or tricyclic antidepressant, (iii) Imaging technique: FDG-PET measuring the LCMRglc or SPECT measuring the regional cerebral blood flow, (iv) Analysis: region-of-interest (ROI) based and whole brain, hemisphere or cerebellum ratios. Exclusion criteria were based on case reports, whole brain analyses and studies providing insufficient data (i.e. no information on pre- and post-treatment mean and standard deviations to calculate the effect size). The search and selection of articles was performed by AvdS and GvW and any discrepancy was solved by agreement. The inter-rater agreement score kappa was calculated.

Extracting data

Characteristics of the subjects and trials from the included studies were collected as followed: (a) group size, (b) type of treatment, (c) imaging technique, (d) duration until follow up (e) mean age, (f) pre-treatment YBOCS score, (g) percentage response rate measured with YBOCS (h) Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HDRS) score [Table 1]. In addition, we determined whether the studies included patients with comorbidity, if and how often they scanned healthy controls and how they defined their regions of interests. The authors described 36 regions of interest in total, which were grouped for further analysis [Table 1]. Although a meta-analysis can be performed with only two studies21, we chose to perform the analysis with a minimum of eight studies for increased power of the statistical tests.

Table 1.

Characteristics of PET and SPECT neuroimaging studies and pre-post treatment effect sizes by region.

Authors N1 Treatment Imaging Rescan (weeks) Mean age (years) YBOCS score HDRS YBOCS decrease (%) Effect size (g)
caudatus OFC thalamus ACC2 putamen PFC3 hippo-campus amygdala
Benkelfat et al. 1990 8 TCA PET 12 32.0 ± 6.6 — 9 ± 3 — −0.13 −0.47 0.11 — −0.15 — 0.17 —
Baxter et al. 1992 6 SSRI PET 12 31.2 ± 12.9 25 ± 4 10 ± 5 36 −0.35 0.17 −0.62 −0.27 0.25 — — —
5 CBT PET 34.7 ± 6.0 24 ± 6 8 ± 6 25 −0.41 −0.19 −0.06 −0.11 −0.22 — — —
Swedo et al. 1992 13 TCA/SSRI PET 52 27.8 ± 7.5 — 9 ± 9 — −0.08 −0.68 — −0.41 — −0.17 −0.08 —
Hoehn-Saric et al. 1992 6 SSRI SPECT 14 33.3 ± 9,8 24 ± 4 — 47 — 0.12 — — — — — —
Rubin et al. 1995 8 TCA SPECT 30 33.6 ± 5.0 21 ± 5 — 48 0.14 — 0.00 — 0.40 — — —
Schwartz et al. 1996 9 CBT PET 12 33.4 ± 6.6 26 ± 4 4 ± 3 49 −0.53 — — — — — — —
Saxena et al. 1999 20 SSRI PET 8–12 — 26 ± 6 9 ± 3 38 −0.32 −1.02 −0,64 −0.34 — — — —
Saxena et al. 2002 25 SSRI PET 8–12 37.5 ± 12.6 26 ± 5 10 ± 4 22 −0.28 −0.23 −0.23 −0.20 −0.22 −0.13 0.00 0.00
Nakatani et al. 2003 22 CBT SPECT 32 29.7 ± 12.0 27 ± 5 14 ± 10 55 −0.46 — −0.16 — — −0.24 — —
Ho Pian et al. 2004 15 SSRI SPECT 12 30.6 ± 11.0 28 ± 4.9 8 ± 4 21 −0.28 0.14 −0.13 — −0.56 — — —
Diler et al. 2004 18 SSRI SPECT 12 13.2 ± 1.6 — — — −0.90 −0.53 — −0.90 — −0.80 — —
Saxena et al. 2009 10 CBT PET 4 46.4 ± 9.9 25 ± 3 12 ± 5 55 0.11 0.00 −0.32 0.00 0.09 0.21 0.18 −0.30
Apostolova et al. 2010 7 SSRI PET 20 30.9 ± 4.6 23 ± 8 — 43 0.00 −0.17 — — — — — —
9 CBT PET 37.1 ± 10.3 23 ± 8 — 47 0.12 0.09 — — — — — —
Karadag et al. 2013 7 SSRI SPECT 33 33.7 ± 9.2 28 ± 4 10 ± 6 54 — — 1.11 0.48 — — — —
Open in a new tab

Characteristics of functional neuroimaging studies and pre-post treatment effect sizes for the caudate nucleus, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), putamen, prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus and amygdala. Treatment: tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), imaging techniques: positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), questionnaires: Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HDRS).

1N = all patients (responders and non-responders).

2Anterior cingulate cortex or ventral anterior cingulate cortex.

3Prefrontal cortex or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Effect size computation

Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software22 was used to perform the analysis. All included studies used the mean ± standard deviation of the sample to report their results. We included all the results reported, significant and non-significant. A separate meta-analysis was performed for each region of interest, averaging the results of both hemispheres. We calculated the standardized mean difference because the studies measured the outcome in a variety of ways. For the studies that reported the results of responders and non-responders separately we calculated the weighted average of the effect sizes by summing the means multiplied by the number of responders/non-responders, divided by the total amount of participants. We expressed our results in terms of Hedges g; for small sample sizes it provides a superior estimate of the standardized mean difference23. The magnitude of Hedges g can be interpreted using Cohen’s convention as small (0.2), medium (0.5), and large (0.8)24. Because we incorporated a group of studies with different sampling frames, we used the random-effects model for the analysis23. The results were corrected with the Holm-Bonferroni method for multiple comparisons25. To calculate the effect size, pre-post correlations are needed. None of the included studies reported the pre-post correlations. Therefore, we assumed that these correlations were similar to those reported in test retest reliability studies for each imaging technique26–28. In the analysis we used the reported correlations of the different regions for FDG-PET studies (0.72–0.88) and SPECT studies (0.54–0.75). For the regions of interest for which we could not obtain any correlation, we chose the most moderate value (r = 0.50).

Cochran’s Q and I2 statistic were used to assess statistical heterogeneity29. We explored the heterogeneity by performing a sensitivity analyses while excluding the study with pediatric participants and excluding studies with patients with depressive disorder as concomitant Axis 1 diagnoses. Jackknife analysis was also carried out to test the replicability of the results, by repeating the analysis with discarding one different study each time. As described above, we combined the results of two nuclear imaging techniques, in line with previous OCD neuroimaging meta-analyses30,31. FDG-PET measures the local cerebral glucose metabolism while SPECT measures the regional cerebral blood flow. These are two different measures and increased glucose metabolism may not always go together with increased blood flow. Therefore, we performed two separate analyses for each imaging technique to determine if combing these results is reasonable. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and the Egger regression test32. The dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Meta-regression

In addition, we performed a random-effect meta-regression33 to determine (1) the differences between treatment with medication and with CBT; (2) the influence of reduction in YBOCS score; (3) the influence of the mean duration until the follow-up scan; (4) the influence of the date of publication. We could only perform meta-regression for the caudate, as meta-regression should not be considered when there are fewer than ten studies in a meta-analysis34. The results of the meta-regression were corrected with a Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Results

Study selection and characteristics

The systematic search retrieved 63 potential articles, of which the title and abstract were scanned for more detailed evaluation. Studies excluded from the analysis were whole brain based9,14,35,36 or did not report the standard deviation of the mean11. In addition, we excluded studies that investigated a combined group of anxiety disorders37 or an individual patient38. The flow of studies reviewed is presented in the PRISMA diagram, see Fig. 1 39. After screening with the inclusion criteria, 14 studies that remained were included in the analysis [Table 1]. The inter-rater agreement score kappa was 1.00 after screening the abstracts and 0.68 after screening the full text. The lower inter-rater reliability was due to inclusion or exclusion of three studies that reported regional blood flow or metabolism expressed as percentage rather than proportion. After agreement to include those studies with rescaling to proportion, kappa increased to 1.00. There were eight PET studies and six SPECT studies included, with a total number of 188 patients. Nine studies treated the OCD patients with an SSRI or clomipramine, three studies treated patients with CBT and two studies treated patients with an SSRI or CBT.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

PRISMA flow diagram.

While the majority of the studies investigated adult patients, Diler et al. included only pediatric patients, aged 11 to 1519. The majority of studies excluded patients with comorbid disorders, although this was not always clearly described10. In the other studies patients with depressive disorder5,13,40 or other concomitant diagnoses like dysthymic disorder, panic disorder or tics participated6,8,12,17. Four studies scanned healthy controls before and after treatment6,12,20,40, other studies only scanned healthy controls before treatment started5,15,19. Because a large proportion of studies did not include data from a healthy comparison group, we performed the analysis without reference to healthy controls. All studies were performed under similar conditions; in a quiet room with as little distractions as possible. During the administration there were no tasks performed. The process of defining the ROIs differed between studies, while some created the ROIs manually for each individual patient on the PET/SPECT scan6–8,15,18,20 or on a co-registered structural MRI12,16,40, others used a predefined FDG template13, a cortical circumferential profiling method17 or predefined slices/boxes5,19 and made no individual adjustments. Also the rater blindness to subject identity and diagnosis differed between studies.

Meta-analysis

As described above, we calculated the effects sizes for the regions most often reported by the included studies [Table 1]. Successful treatment led to a significant decrease of activity in the caudate nucleus (g = −0.25, 95% CI = −0.40, −0.10, k = 12, Z = −3.26, p < 0.01, Q = 21.73, df = 13, p = 0.06, I2 = 40.2) and the OFC (g = −0.25, 95% CI = −0.47, −0.03, k = 10, Z = −2.25, p = 0.05, Q = 27.34, df = 11, p < 0.01, I2 = 59.8). There was no significant effect found in the thalamus (g = −0.13, 95% CI = −0.36, 0.10, k = 9, Z = −1.14, p = 0.26, Q = 23.26, df = 9, p < 0.01, I2 = 61.3). As shown in the forest plots [Figs 2, 3 and 4], the average magnitude of the effect sizes found in the analysis were small (0.13–0.25), ranging from small negative effects to large positive effects. The heterogeneity of the results was substantial for the studies looking at the OFC (Q = 27.34, df = 11, p < 0.01, I2 = 59.8) and the thalamus (Q = 23.26, df = 9, p < 0.01, I2 = 61.3), and was moderate in the caudate nucleus (Q = 21.73, df = 13, p = 0.06, I2 = 40.2). We explored heterogeneity by performing sensitivity analyses while excluding studies with aberrant patient characteristics. By removing the studies that included patients with depressive disorder as comorbid diagnosis from the analysis, heterogeneity did not improve substantially. Excluding the study with pediatric participants led to a slight improvement in heterogeneity of the caudate results. The heterogeneity among studies was accounted for by using the random-effects model for the meta-analyses23. The jackknife sensitivity analysis on the overall results indicated that the decreased activity in the caudate nucleus was highly replicable, as this finding was preserved throughout all the combinations of studies. The effect sizes became a trend towards significant by repeating the analysis with discarding two of the studies for the OFC10,19. After removing one study from the analysis, the effect size for the thalamus became highly significant (g = −0.23, 95% CI = −0.38, −0.07, k = 8, Z = −2.67, p < 0.01, Q = 9.59, df = 7, p = 0.30, I2 = 12.5)20.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of effect sizes of the caudate nucleus for PET and SPECT studies combined.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of effect sizes of the orbitofrontal cortex for PET and SPECT studies combined.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Forest plot of effect sizes of the thalamus for PET and SPECT studies combined.

In addition, we performed a separate analysis for each imaging technique, because increased glucose metabolism does not always lead to increased blood flow. The effect directions were negative in the separate analyses for both imaging techniques, indicating a decrease of blood flow and glucose metabolism in all the regions of interest after treatment. FDG-PET studies showed a significant decrease of glucose metabolism in the caudate nucleus (g = −0.18; 95% CI = −0.32, −0.05, k = 8, Z = −2.65, p < 0.01, Q = 7.64, df = 7, p = 0.57, I2 = 0.0), the OFC (g = −0.29; 95% CI = −0.54, −0.03, k = 7, Z = −2.23, p = 0.03, Q = 21.87, df = 6, p < 0.01, I2 = 63.4) and the thalamus (g = −0.30; 95% CI = −0.53, −0.07, k = 5, Z = −2.61, p < 0.01, Q = 7.13, df = 4, p = 0.21, I2 = 29.8). SPECT studies only showed a significant decrease of blood flow in the caudate nucleus (g = −0.40; 95% CI = −0.78, −0.01, k = 4, Z = −2.03, p = 0.04, Q = 10.21, df = 3, p = 0.02, I2 = 70.6). There were no signs of publication bias by visually screening the funnel plots of the analyses of the caudate nucleus and OFC. In addition, the Egger’s regression showed no evidence for publication bias for the caudate nucleus (bias = 1.11, 95% CI = −2.79, 5.02, p = 0.54) and the OFC (bias = 1.99, 95% CI = −3.33, 7.31, p = 0.42). The funnel plot and Egger’s regression test for the analysis of the thalamus suggested possible publication bias, with an outlier to the right side (bias = 3.06, 95% CI = −0.46, 6.58, p = 0.08) that had a large influence on the results.

Meta-regression

As described above, we could only perform a meta-regression for the caudate nucleus as meta-regression should not be considered when there are fewer than ten studies in a meta-analysis. Meta-regression analyses showed no difference between CBT and medication-induced effects on the caudate nucleus. Similarly, there was no significant influence of level of symptom improvement, mean duration until follow up scan and year of publication.

Discussion

The aim of our meta-analysis was to aggregate the results from previous small sample studies that investigated the impact of treatment on brain activity in OCD. The analysis that combined PET and SPECT imaging studies showed that successful treatment reduced activity in the caudate nucleus and the OFC. There was no significant effect observed in the thalamus, but the jackknife sensitivity analysis showed that this was due to one particular study20. By removing this study from the analysis the decrease in activity was highly significant. The average effect sizes were small, presumably due to the combination of studies reporting medium to large effects and studies reporting no effect in the different brain structures. Our results support the hypothesis that symptom reduction is associated with a decrease of resting cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism in the CSTC circuit. In the separate analyses for these imaging techniques, FDG-PET studies showed a significant decrease of glucose metabolism in the caudate nucleus, the OFC and the thalamus. SPECT studies only showed a significant decrease of blood flow in the caudate nucleus. Meta-regression analysis showed no differences between CBT and medication-induced effects on the caudate nucleus. No significant effects of the reduction in YBOCS score, year of publication and the mean duration until the follow up scan were detected.

The analysis showed normalization of activity in the caudate nucleus, the area that that showed a significant difference in activity between OCD patients and controls in a previous meta-analysis31. Our results partially corroborate the conclusions from a recently published systematic review41, which reported decreased activity in the ventral CSTC circuits and increased activity in the dorsal CSTC circuits during cognitive processing as assessed with FDG-PET, SPECT and fMRI after psychotherapy in OCD patients. However, the increased activity in the dorsal circuit was only reported in fMRI studies using cognitive paradigms, which were not included in our analysis. And because of the limited amount of studies, we could not perform a meta-analysis on all the regions of interest described in the existing literature, nor perform a meta-analysis on results that have been reported using whole brain analyses (e.g.,9,14,35). Remarkable is that the jackknife sensitivity analysis showed that the non-significant result of the thalamus was due to one study with a large positive effect, which is in conflict with the previous literature20. A possible explanation of this inconsistent finding might be the fact that they analyzed their scans semi-quantitatively and selected the best slices for thalamic evaluation manually, which might have introduced a bias in the results compared to methods that averaged data for the entire thalamus. Interestingly, this suggests that the effects of treatment on the thalamus may be different across subregions within the thalamus.

The analysis of CBT and medication-related changes at the level of brain areas and circuits provides a better perspective on the pathophysiology of OCD and the response to different treatments. Our results cannot clarify the etiology of OCD, but do support the link between activity in specific brain circuits and reduction of symptoms after successful treatment42. The OFC is seen as a crucial integrating link in emotional processing and plays an important role in the consequences of making decisions. The caudate nucleus integrates cortical information, selects and generates routines in response to the specific stimuli. The anterior nucleus of the thalamus plays a role in emotional expression, sending projections to the anterior cingulate cortex43. Keeping the function of these areas in mind, normalization of activity in these areas could lead to a reduction of repetitive thoughts, repetitive behaviors and anxiety. It is still unclear whether the changes in brain function lead to symptom reduction or are a consequence of the symptom reduction. Some of the included studies describe a correlation between the reduction in YBOCS score and changes in brain activity13,40. Our meta-regression analysis showed no influence of the decrease in YBOCS score. This might be because the response rates between the studies were similar and we performed the meta-regression on study level.

It is a general assumption that increased glucose metabolism leads to increased blood flow, as the blood has to supply the glucose and has to carry away the metabolic waste products. Cerebral glucose metabolism and regional blood flow have been reported to be closely correlated in healthy controls44. Altered coupling of cerebral glucose metabolism and regional cerebral blood flow have been reported in major depressive disorder45,46. Our results showed no sign of uncoupling between cerebral blood flow and cerebral glucose utilization during recovery, as both of the measures decreased in the analyzed regions.

The findings of our meta-analysis are limited by a number of factors. In most of the studies the participants were re-scanned after 8–12 weeks, but some were rescanned after months or until recovery. Although our meta-regression showed no effect of the main duration until the follow up scan, the clinical symptoms and the brain change continuously and the different results might therefore correlate with the timing of the second scan. Previous research suggested that the caudate changes may occur earlier in the course of treatment, while cortical changes may occur at the end of treatment6. In addition, the lack of healthy controls was an important methodological limitation in the analyzed studies. Changes in activity might be the consequence of passed time or previous exposure to the scanning environment if the results are not compared to a healthy control group that is also investigated twice. Because of the limited amount of studies, we performed the analyses without reference to healthy controls. Heterogeneity was substantial for the studies looking at the OFC and thalamus. Clinical and methodological diversity between the studies are likely to contribute to the heterogeneity. Possible explanations are the use of different imaging techniques and the inclusion of participants in different age groups and with comorbid disorders. In addition, the process of defining the ROIs differed substantially between studies. Some of the studies used a predefined template for the ROIs and made no individual alterations, while others manually draw the regions on the functional or the co-registered structural MRI scan. Because the ROIs are generally drawn manually, they vary with devices, raters and research facilities. This variability may lower the reliability and reproducibility of the results and might therefore contribute to the observed heterogeneity.

Although the funnel plots and Egger’s regression tests showed no evidence of publication bias for the majority of the analyses, this field of research is prone to report results that are in line with the previous literature. The studies predefine their regions of interest based on the previous literature, which might also be contaminated by publication bias. Since recruitment of OCD patients is often challenging, many of the individual studies have small sample sizes, which undermines the reliability of the results. Furthermore, the power to detect bias with the Egger’s regression test is low with a small numbers of studies, so we cannot fully exclude the possibility of publication bias. The question whether treatment with CBT or SSRIs in OCD leads to similar or different functional changes in the brain remains to be addressed. Most of the studies found no differences between the treatment modalities6,13,40. Important methodological shortcomings in these studies are the small sample sizes and the lack of randomization. Therefore, neuroimaging studies controlled by a randomized treatment intervention are needed to assess whether SSRIs and CBT also have different effects on the brain.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis revealed consistent though small pharmacological and CBT-induced changes in cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism in the caudate nucleus and OFC in patients with OCD. There was no significant effect found in the thalamus, although the jackknife sensitivity analysis showed that this was due to a large positive effect in one particular study. Therefore, our results support the hypothesis that symptom reduction in OCD is associated with decreased CSTC circuit activity. Remarkable is the small reduction in activity in the particular brain structures, which is a result of studies reporting medium to large effect sizes combined with other studies reporting no significant effect of treatment.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO/ZonMW Vidi 917.15.318).

Author Contributions

A.S. and G.W. performed the search and wrote the main manuscript text, all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Ruscio AM, Stein DJ, Chiu WT, Kessler RC. The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:53–63. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Koran LM, et al. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:5–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goodman WK, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. II. Validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:1012–1016. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110054008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van den Heuvel, O. A. et al. Brain circuitry of compulsivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.005 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Benkelfat C, et al. Local cerebral glucose metabolic rates in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Patients treated with clomipramine. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47:840–848. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810210048007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baxter, L. R. Jr. et al. Caudate glucose metabolic rate changes with both drug and behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry49, 681–9 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Schwartz JM, et al. Systematic changes in cerebral glucose metabolic rate after successful behavior modification treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:109–113. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830020023004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saxena S, et al. Localized orbitofrontal and subcortical metabolic changes and predictors of response to paroxetine treatment in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;21:683–693. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00082-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hansen ES, Hasselbalch S, Law I, Bolwig TG. The caudate nucleus in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Reduced metabolism following treatment with paroxetine: a PET study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002;5:1–10. doi: 10.1017/S1461145701002681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Swedo SE, et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in childhood-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder. Revisualization during pharmacotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:690–694. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820090018003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Perani D, et al. [18F]FDG PET study in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A clinical/metabolic correlation study after treatment. The British journal of psychiatry: the journal of mental science. 1995;166:244–250. doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.2.244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saxena S, et al. Differential cerebral metabolic changes with paroxetine treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder vs major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:250–261. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.3.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Apostolova I, et al. Effects of behavioral therapy or pharmacotherapy on brain glucose metabolism in subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder as assessed by brain FDG PET. Psychiatry Res. 2010;184:105–116. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamanishi T, et al. Changes after behavior therapy among responsive and nonresponsive patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2009;172:242–250. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nakatani E, et al. Effects of behavior therapy on regional cerebral blood flow in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2003;124:113–120. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4927(03)00069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ho Pian KL, et al. Decreased thalamic blood flow in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients responding to fluvoxamine. Psychiatry Res. 2005;138:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2004.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoehn-Saric R, Pearlson GD, Harris GJ, Machlin SR, Camargo EE. Effects of fluoxetine on regional cerebral blood flow in obsessive-compulsive patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1243–1245. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.9.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rubin RT, Ananth J, Villanueva-Meyer J, Trajmar PG, Mena I. Regional 133xenon cerebral blood flow and cerebral 99mTc-HMPAO uptake in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder before and during treatment. Biol Psychiatry. 1995;38:429–437. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)00305-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Diler RS, Kibar M, Avci A. Pharmacotherapy and regional cerebral blood flow in children with obsessive compulsive disorder. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45:90–99. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.1.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Karadag F, et al. The comparison of pre- and post-treatment (99m)Tc HMPAO brain SPECT images in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2013;213:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Valentine J. How Many Studies Do You Need? A Primer on Statistical Power for Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2010;35:215–247. doi: 10.3102/1076998609346961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. & Rothstein, H. Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Engelwood, NJ: Bistate (2005).
  • 23.Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis (Academic Press, 1985).
  • 24.Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge Academic, 1988).
  • 25.Holm S. A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 1979;6:65–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Deutsch G, Mountz JM, Katholi CR, Liu HG, Harrell LE. Regional stability of cerebral blood flow measured by repeated technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT: implications for the study of state-dependent change. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:6–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Holcomb HH, et al. PET-FDG test-retest reliability during a visual discrimination task in schizophrenia. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993;17:704–709. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199309000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bartlett EJ, et al. Reproducibility of cerebral glucose metabolic measurements in resting human subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1988;8:502–512. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1988.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aylward EH, et al. Normal caudate nucleus in obsessive-compulsive disorder assessed by quantitative neuroimaging. Arch Gen Psychiat. 1996;53:577–584. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830070021006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Whiteside SP, Port JD, Abramowitz JS. A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiat Res-Neuroim. 2004;132:69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2004.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Colditz GA. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1995;14:395–411. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780140406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thompson SG, Higgins JP. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med. 2002;21:1559–1573. doi: 10.1002/sim.1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kang DH, et al. Brain glucose metabolic changes associated with neuropsychological improvements after 4 months of treatment in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;107:291–297. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hendler T, et al. Brain reactivity to specific symptom provocation indicates prospective therapeutic outcome in OCD. Psychiatry Res. 2003;124:87–103. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4927(03)00091-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Carey PD, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of anxiety disorders before and after treatment with citalopram. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-4-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Molina V, et al. Drug therapy and cerebral perfusion in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:2234–2238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Saxena S, et al. Rapid effects of brief intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy on brain glucose metabolism in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14:197–205. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Thorsen AL, van den Heuvel OA, Hansen B, Kvale G. Neuroimaging of psychotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2015;233:306–313. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Aouizerate B, et al. Pathophysiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a necessary link between phenomenology, neuropsychology, imagery and physiology. Prog Neurobiol. 2004;72:195–221. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pauls DL, Abramovitch A, Rauch SL, Geller DA. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: an integrative genetic and neurobiological perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:410–424. doi: 10.1038/nrn3746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ginsberg MD, et al. Increases in both cerebral glucose utilization and blood flow during execution of a somatosensory task. Ann Neurol. 1988;23:152–160. doi: 10.1002/ana.410230208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Conca A, et al. Preliminary findings of simultaneous 18F-FDG and 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT in patients with depressive disorders at rest: differential correlates with ratings of anxiety. Psychiatry Res. 2000;98:43–54. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4927(99)00051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dunn RT, et al. Preliminary findings of uncoupling of flow and metabolism in unipolar compared with bipolar affective illness and normal controls. Psychiatry Res. 2005;140:181–198. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES