Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2017 Sep 19;73(Pt 10):1497–1500. doi: 10.1107/S2056989017013093

Unusual formation of (E)-11-(amino­methyl­ene)-8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-5(7H)-one and its crystal structure

Khamid U Khodjaniyazov a, Utkir S Makhmudov a, Kambarali K Turgunov a,*, Burkhon Z Elmuradov a
PMCID: PMC5730303  PMID: 29250366

Unusual formation of (E)-11-(amino­methyl­ene)-8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro-pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-5(7H)-one was found at formyl­ation of 8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]-azepin-5(7H)-one, which was explained by re-amination of firstly formed inter­mediate.

Keywords: fused pyrimidines, formyl­ation, Vilsmeier–Haack reagent, X-ray structure analysis, crystal structure

Abstract

Selective C-formyl­ation of 8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]-azepin-5(7H)-one has been studied for the first time. It was revealed that formyl­ation proceeds by the formation of an inter­mediate salt, which due to the re-amination process on treatment with aqueous ammonia transformed into the corresponding (E)-11-(amino­methyl­ene)-8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]-pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-5(7H)-one, C13H14N4O, as an E-isomer. Formyl­ation was carried out by Vilsmeier–Haack reagent and the structure of the synthesized compound was confirmed by X-ray structural analysis, spectroscopic and LC–MS methods. In the mol­ecule, the seven-membered penta­methyl­ene ring adopts a twist-boat conformation.

Chemical context  

Pyrimidine-containing heterocyclic compounds are widely distributed in nature (Lagoja, 2005) and among synthetic compounds (Joshi et al., 2016; Roopan & Sompalle, 2016). These compounds are of theoretical and practical inter­est, having plural reactivity and with many prospective biologically active compounds among the synthesized derivatives.

In previous reports we have described several syntheses, viz. the reaction of 2,3-tri­methyl­enepyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one with aromatic aldehydes (Khodjaniyazov, 2015a ,b ; Khodjaniyazov & Ashurov, 2016), selective reduction with sodium borohydride (Khodjaniyazov et al., 2016b ), and the formation of (E)-9-(N,N-di­methyl­amino­methyl­idene)-8,9-di­hydro­pyrido[2,3-d]pyrrolo­[1,2-a]pyrimidin-5(7H)-one (Kho­djaniyazov et al., 2016a ). In this current report we present the results of reaction of 8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-5(7H)-one (1) with the Vilsmeier–Haack reagent, decomposition by water and subsequent treatment with aqueous ammonia. We carried out the inter­action of 1 with a formyl­ating agent and, at the end of the reaction, the unusual final product (E)-11-(amino­methyl­ene)-8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]pyrimido-[1,2-a]azepin-5(7H)-one (3) was isolated after treatment (re-amination) of 11-di­methyl­amino­methyl­idene derivative (2) with aqueous ammonia. The reaction proceeds as shown in Fig. 1. The reaction product was different from that obtained in the case of formyl­ation of 2,3-tri­methyl­ene­pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one [pyrido[2,3-d]pyrrolo­[1,2-a]pyrimidin-5(7H)-one; Khodjaniyazov et al., 2016a ]. This fact was explained by re-amination of the initially formed di­methyl­amino­methyl­idene derivative 2 under action of aqueous ammonia to give (E)-11-(amino­methyl­ene)-8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]pyrimido[1,2-a]azepin-5(7H)-one (3) as the final productgraphic file with name e-73-01497-scheme1.jpg.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Reaction scheme.

Structural commentary  

The title compound crystallizes in the centrosymmetric monoclinic P21/c (No. 14) space group. The asymmetric unit contains one crystallographically independent mol­ecule. A displacement ellipsoid plot showing the atom-numbering scheme is presented in Fig. 2. In the mol­ecule, the seven-membered penta­methyl­ene ring exhibits a twist-boat conformation and has an approximate twofold symmetry with a C2 axis passing through atom C12 and midpoint of the C2—C9 bond. The amino group is E-oriented and hybridization of the N atom in this group lies between sp 3 and sp 2. The C—N bond makes an angle of 155° with the bis­ector of the H—N—H angle. The equivalent angle in methyl­amine with a pyramidal sp 3-hybridized N atom is ∼123° (Klingebiel et al., 2002) and it is nearly 180° in formamide with a planar sp2-hybridized N atom (Gajda & Katrusiak, 2011). The pyrimidine ring is twisted slightly, which may be because of the influence of the twisted seven-membered azepane ring. The N1—C8A—N4A—C4 torsion angle of is 8.7 (4)°.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The mol­ecular structure of compound 3, with the atom labelling and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal, hydrogen bonds with 16 ring and three chain motifs are generated by N—H⋯N and N—H⋯O contacts (Table 1). The amino group is located close to the nitro­gen atoms N1 and N8 of an inversion-related mol­ecule, forming hydrogen bonds with Inline graphic(4) and Inline graphic(12) graph-set motifs (Fig. 3). This amino group also forms a hydrogen bond with the C=O oxygen atom of a mol­ecule translated along the a axis, which links the mol­ecules into Inline graphic(16) rings. Hydrogen-bonded chains are formed along [100] by alternating Inline graphic(12) and Inline graphic(16) rings (Fig. 4). These chains are stabilized by inter­molecular π-π-stacking inter­actions observed between the pyridine and pyrimidine rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.669 (2) Å; symmetry operation 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z].

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N15—H1⋯O1i 0.85 (3) 2.21 (3) 3.017 (3) 159 (3)
N15—H2⋯N1ii 0.85 (5) 2.31 (5) 3.146 (3) 168 (4)
N15—H2⋯N8ii 0.85 (5) 2.79 (5) 3.401 (4) 131 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hydrogen bonding in the title compound showing the Inline graphic(4) and Inline graphic(12) graph-set motifs.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Hydrogen-bonded chain formation in 3.

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.38, last update November 2016; Groom et al., 2016) for the 4-aza­quinazoline moiety gave eight hits. Only one of these is a related structure, a tricyclic 4-aza­quinazolin-4-one with a substituent on the third ring (VAMBET; Khodjaniyazov & Ashurov, 2016).

Synthesis and crystallization  

Materials and methods. The results of electro spray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) were recorded using a 6420 TripleQuadLC/MC (Agilent Technologies, US) LC–MS spectrometer. The measurements were carried out in positive-ion mode. 1H NMR spectra were recorded in CD3OD on a Varian 400-MR spectrometer operating accordingly at 400 MHz. Hexa­methyl­disiloxcane (HMDSO) was used as inter­nal standard and the chemical shift of 1H was recorded in ppm. Melting points were measured on a Boetius and MEL–TEMP apparatus manufactured by Branstead inter­national (USA) and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on an IR Fourier System 2000 (Perkin–Elmer) as KBr pellets.

The reaction process was monitored by TLC on Silufol UV-254 plates using a CHCl3/CH3OH (12:1) solvent system and the developed plates were visualized under a UV lamp. Solvents were purified by standard procedures. Organic solutions were dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 or with dried CaCl2.

Synthesis of ( E )-11-(amino­methyl­ene)-8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]-pyrimido[1,2- a ]azepin-5(7 H )-one (3). A round-bottom flask with freshly distilled DMF (3 ml, 39 mmol) was cooled by an ice–water bath and POCl3 (1 ml, 10.7 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred (30 min), then 8,9,10,11-tetra­hydro­pyrido[2′,3′:4,5]pyrim­ido[1,2-a]azepin-5(7H)-one (1) (0.51 g, 2.4 mmol) was added into the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was heated in a water bath for 1.5 h at 343 K and left for another day. Water (4 ml) was poured into the flask. TLC monitoring showed that the initial compound had fully transformed. The reaction mixture was treated by aqueous ammonia solution up to pH 9. The obtained solution was extracted by chloro­form (30 mL) three times. The chloro­form part was dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent was removed. Yield 0.34 g (60%), m.p. 458–460 K, R f 0.63. Single crystals of 3 were grown from acetone solution by slow evaporation of the solvent at room temperature.

UV spectrum (ethanol, λmax, nm) neutral medium: 279.58, 348.97; acidic medium (HCl): 280.24, 362.37, 420.80; neutralization (HCl+NaOH): 279.12, 318.11, 362.29; basic medium (NaOH): 275.83, 347.71. IR spectrum (KBr, ν, cm−1): 3382 (NH2), 3325, 3203, 3064, 2924, 2869, 2824, 1642, 1613 (NH), 1591, 1562, 1523, 1470, 1433, 1389, 1353, 1319, 1267, 1249, 1227, 1184, 1126, 1107, 1077, 1045, 976, 934, 864, 825, 783, 735, 688, 663, 601, 548, 420. LC–MS (+ESI): 243 [M+H]+, 216.1, 201.1, 174, 160.9, 148.0, 121.0, 93.0, 79.0, 55.1, 39.1. 1H NMR spectrum [400 MHz, CD3OD, δ, ppm, J (Hz]): 1.77 (2H, m, γ-CH2), 1.92 (2H, m, δ-CH2), 2.385 (2H, m, β-CH2), 4.195 (2H, t, J = 6.1, ∊-CH2), 7.454 (1H, br s, =CH), 7.28 (1H, dd, J = 4.6, 7.9, H-6), 8.45 (1H, dd, J = 7.9, 2.1, H-5), 8.735 (1H, dd, J = 4.6, 2.1, H-7).

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. H-bound N atoms were freely refined. C-bound H atoms were refined as riding with C—H = 0.93 or 0.97 Å and U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C13H14N4O
M r 242.28
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 293
a, b, c (Å) 8.7260 (7), 15.236 (3), 8.6642 (7)
β (°) 98.046 (8)
V3) 1140.6 (3)
Z 4
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.76
Crystal size (mm) 0.40 × 0.35 × 0.15
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur, Ruby
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
T min, T max 0.965, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7589, 2328, 1478
R int 0.059
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.631
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.050, 0.141, 1.04
No. of reflections 2328
No. of parameters 171
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.18, −0.20

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), SHELXS7 and XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017013093/xu5905sup1.cif

e-73-01497-sup1.cif (270.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017013093/xu5905Isup2.hkl

e-73-01497-Isup2.hkl (128KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1530092

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C13H14N4O Dx = 1.411 Mg m3
Mr = 242.28 Melting point: 458(2) K
Monoclinic, P21/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
a = 8.7260 (7) Å Cell parameters from 911 reflections
b = 15.236 (3) Å θ = 5.9–75.7°
c = 8.6642 (7) Å µ = 0.76 mm1
β = 98.046 (8)° T = 293 K
V = 1140.6 (3) Å3 Plate, colourless
Z = 4 0.40 × 0.35 × 0.15 mm
F(000) = 512

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur, Ruby diffractometer 2328 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Cu) X-ray Source 1478 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.059
Detector resolution: 10.2576 pixels mm-1 θmax = 76.7°, θmin = 5.1°
ω scans h = −9→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis Pro; Oxford Diffraction, 2007) k = −19→18
Tmin = 0.965, Tmax = 1.000 l = −10→8
7589 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.141 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0554P)2 + 0.003P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2328 reflections Δρmax = 0.18 e Å3
171 parameters Δρmin = −0.20 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.6098 (2) 0.35990 (15) 0.1710 (2) 0.0621 (5)
N3 0.3638 (2) 0.39263 (13) 0.2102 (2) 0.0449 (4)
N1 0.2921 (2) 0.40925 (14) 0.4621 (2) 0.0472 (5)
N8 0.4731 (3) 0.39670 (16) 0.6821 (2) 0.0569 (5)
N15 −0.1422 (3) 0.49351 (19) 0.2758 (3) 0.0606 (6)
C2 0.2547 (3) 0.40679 (15) 0.3099 (3) 0.0438 (5)
C9 0.0935 (3) 0.41797 (17) 0.2412 (3) 0.0478 (5)
C4A 0.5549 (3) 0.36809 (16) 0.4323 (3) 0.0468 (5)
C8A 0.4417 (3) 0.39271 (15) 0.5243 (3) 0.0459 (5)
C4 0.5167 (3) 0.37221 (16) 0.2626 (3) 0.0476 (5)
C14 0.0100 (3) 0.47631 (17) 0.3123 (3) 0.0491 (5)
H14A 0.0630 0.5078 0.3950 0.059*
C13 0.3195 (3) 0.40613 (17) 0.0415 (3) 0.0502 (6)
H13A 0.4110 0.4200 −0.0056 0.060*
H13B 0.2492 0.4556 0.0247 0.060*
C5 0.7016 (3) 0.34430 (18) 0.5046 (3) 0.0557 (6)
H5A 0.7782 0.3280 0.4457 0.067*
C12 0.2420 (3) 0.32550 (18) −0.0367 (3) 0.0560 (6)
H12A 0.1995 0.3400 −0.1432 0.067*
H12B 0.3189 0.2798 −0.0403 0.067*
C6 0.7310 (3) 0.34538 (19) 0.6636 (3) 0.0576 (6)
H6A 0.8268 0.3281 0.7154 0.069*
C10 0.0156 (3) 0.3637 (2) 0.1043 (3) 0.0607 (7)
H10A −0.0772 0.3374 0.1341 0.073*
H10B −0.0163 0.4030 0.0177 0.073*
C7 0.6134 (3) 0.3731 (2) 0.7466 (3) 0.0603 (6)
H7A 0.6354 0.3750 0.8547 0.072*
C11 0.1136 (3) 0.2911 (2) 0.0480 (3) 0.0617 (7)
H11A 0.1589 0.2566 0.1368 0.074*
H11B 0.0474 0.2527 −0.0214 0.074*
H1 −0.201 (4) 0.456 (2) 0.224 (4) 0.112 (16)*
H2 −0.181 (6) 0.527 (3) 0.338 (5) 0.16 (2)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0464 (10) 0.0880 (14) 0.0538 (10) 0.0053 (9) 0.0141 (8) −0.0095 (9)
N3 0.0398 (10) 0.0537 (11) 0.0415 (10) −0.0006 (8) 0.0065 (8) −0.0030 (8)
N1 0.0420 (10) 0.0574 (12) 0.0430 (10) 0.0022 (9) 0.0082 (8) −0.0032 (8)
N8 0.0562 (13) 0.0707 (14) 0.0428 (11) 0.0026 (10) 0.0039 (9) −0.0027 (9)
N15 0.0465 (13) 0.0786 (17) 0.0566 (13) 0.0100 (11) 0.0072 (10) 0.0016 (11)
C2 0.0416 (12) 0.0462 (12) 0.0440 (12) −0.0003 (9) 0.0070 (9) −0.0030 (9)
C9 0.0400 (12) 0.0593 (14) 0.0443 (12) 0.0014 (10) 0.0071 (9) −0.0003 (10)
C4A 0.0424 (12) 0.0492 (13) 0.0484 (12) −0.0002 (10) 0.0047 (10) −0.0026 (9)
C8A 0.0430 (12) 0.0494 (13) 0.0450 (12) 0.0015 (9) 0.0049 (9) −0.0019 (9)
C4 0.0404 (12) 0.0500 (12) 0.0533 (13) 0.0002 (10) 0.0097 (10) −0.0076 (10)
C14 0.0393 (12) 0.0630 (15) 0.0446 (12) 0.0021 (11) 0.0042 (9) 0.0033 (10)
C13 0.0478 (13) 0.0601 (15) 0.0436 (12) 0.0002 (11) 0.0088 (10) 0.0018 (10)
C5 0.0450 (14) 0.0610 (16) 0.0611 (15) 0.0061 (11) 0.0074 (11) −0.0003 (11)
C12 0.0616 (16) 0.0598 (16) 0.0457 (13) 0.0034 (12) 0.0044 (11) −0.0082 (10)
C6 0.0467 (13) 0.0625 (16) 0.0600 (15) 0.0042 (11) −0.0053 (11) 0.0051 (12)
C10 0.0461 (14) 0.0748 (18) 0.0598 (16) −0.0004 (13) 0.0023 (11) −0.0098 (13)
C7 0.0628 (16) 0.0693 (17) 0.0455 (13) −0.0001 (13) −0.0036 (11) 0.0008 (11)
C11 0.0616 (17) 0.0634 (17) 0.0589 (16) −0.0091 (13) 0.0046 (12) −0.0110 (12)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O1—C4 1.227 (3) C14—H14A 0.9300
N3—C4 1.383 (3) C13—C12 1.516 (4)
N3—C2 1.389 (3) C13—H13A 0.9700
N3—C13 1.473 (3) C13—H13B 0.9700
N1—C2 1.314 (3) C5—C6 1.365 (4)
N1—C8A 1.364 (3) C5—H5A 0.9300
N8—C7 1.323 (4) C12—C11 1.516 (4)
N8—C8A 1.357 (3) C12—H12A 0.9700
N15—C14 1.347 (3) C12—H12B 0.9700
N15—H1 0.852 (19) C6—C7 1.398 (4)
N15—H2 0.849 (19) C6—H6A 0.9300
C2—C9 1.458 (3) C10—C11 1.519 (4)
C9—C14 1.352 (3) C10—H10A 0.9700
C9—C10 1.525 (4) C10—H10B 0.9700
C4A—C5 1.392 (3) C7—H7A 0.9300
C4A—C8A 1.405 (3) C11—H11A 0.9700
C4A—C4 1.463 (3) C11—H11B 0.9700
C4—N3—C2 122.98 (19) C12—C13—H13B 109.3
C4—N3—C13 117.70 (18) H13A—C13—H13B 107.9
C2—N3—C13 119.16 (19) C6—C5—C4A 118.8 (2)
C2—N1—C8A 118.76 (19) C6—C5—H5A 120.6
C7—N8—C8A 117.3 (2) C4A—C5—H5A 120.6
C14—N15—H1 120 (3) C11—C12—C13 112.1 (2)
C14—N15—H2 116 (4) C11—C12—H12A 109.2
H1—N15—H2 118 (4) C13—C12—H12A 109.2
N1—C2—N3 122.2 (2) C11—C12—H12B 109.2
N1—C2—C9 119.8 (2) C13—C12—H12B 109.2
N3—C2—C9 118.0 (2) H12A—C12—H12B 107.9
C14—C9—C2 116.2 (2) C5—C6—C7 118.4 (2)
C14—C9—C10 120.1 (2) C5—C6—H6A 120.8
C2—C9—C10 123.6 (2) C7—C6—H6A 120.8
C5—C4A—C8A 119.3 (2) C11—C10—C9 115.8 (2)
C5—C4A—C4 121.9 (2) C11—C10—H10A 108.3
C8A—C4A—C4 118.7 (2) C9—C10—H10A 108.3
N8—C8A—N1 115.9 (2) C11—C10—H10B 108.3
N8—C8A—C4A 121.6 (2) C9—C10—H10B 108.3
N1—C8A—C4A 122.3 (2) H10A—C10—H10B 107.4
O1—C4—N3 121.1 (2) N8—C7—C6 124.6 (2)
O1—C4—C4A 124.5 (2) N8—C7—H7A 117.7
N3—C4—C4A 114.40 (19) C6—C7—H7A 117.7
N15—C14—C9 126.7 (2) C12—C11—C10 113.0 (2)
N15—C14—H14A 116.6 C12—C11—H11A 109.0
C9—C14—H14A 116.6 C10—C11—H11A 109.0
N3—C13—C12 111.7 (2) C12—C11—H11B 109.0
N3—C13—H13A 109.3 C10—C11—H11B 109.0
C12—C13—H13A 109.3 H11A—C11—H11B 107.8
N3—C13—H13B 109.3

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N15—H1···O1i 0.85 (3) 2.21 (3) 3.017 (3) 159 (3)
N15—H2···N1ii 0.85 (5) 2.31 (5) 3.146 (3) 168 (4)
N15—H2···N8ii 0.85 (5) 2.79 (5) 3.401 (4) 131 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1, y, z; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z+1.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Academy of Sciences Republic of Uzbekistan grant FA-F7-T207.

References

  1. Gajda, R. & Katrusiak, A. (2011). Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 4768–4774.
  2. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Joshi, G., Nayyar, H., Marin Alex, J. S., Vishwakarma, G. S., Mittal, S. & Kumar, R. (2016). Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 16, 3175–3210. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Khodjaniyazov, Kh. U. (2015a). J. Adv. Chem 11, 3873–3875.
  5. Khodjaniyazov, Kh. U. (2015b). Uzb. Chem. J. 22-25.
  6. Khodjaniyazov, Kh. U. & Ashurov, J. M. (2016). Acta Cryst. E72, 452–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Khodjaniyazov, Kh. U., Makhmudov, U. S. & Kutlimuratov, N. M. (2016a). J. Basic Appl. Res 2, 382–385.
  8. Khodjaniyazov, Kh. U., Mamadrakhimov, A. A., Tadjimukhamedov, Kh. S. & Levkovich, M. G. (2016b). J. Basic Appl. Res. 2, 82–85.
  9. Klingebiel, U., Neugebauer, P., Müller, I., Noltemeyer, M. & Usón, I. (2002). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 717–722.
  10. Lagoja, I. M. (2005). Chem. Biodivers 2, 1-50. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Oxford Diffraction. (2007). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.
  12. Roopan, S. M. & Sompalle, R. (2016). Syn. Commun 46, 645-672.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017013093/xu5905sup1.cif

e-73-01497-sup1.cif (270.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017013093/xu5905Isup2.hkl

e-73-01497-Isup2.hkl (128KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1530092

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES