Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 8;8(60):101383–101393. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20711

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis for progression-free survival and overall survival from the second-line of chemotherapy.

Progression-Free Survival Overall Survival
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Age (years)
 ≤ 60 vs > 60R 0.85 (0.57-1.27) 0.43 1.18 (0.76-1.82) 0.44
Gender
 Male vs female R 0.65 (0.40-1.05) 0.08 0.62 (0.37-1.03) 0.06
ECOG performance status
 0-1 vs ≥ 2 R 0.52 (0.32-0.86) 0.009 0.56 (0.34-0.91) 0.02 0.35 (0.21-0.59) <.0001 0.34 (0.20-0.57) <.0001
Primary tumor site
 Junction vs stomach R 0.76 (0.50-1.13) 0.18 0.70 (0.45-1.09) 0.11
Histological type
 Diffuse/mixed vs intestinal R 1 (0.53-1.90) 0.99 0.82 (0.41-1.63) 0.57
Tumor grade
 Well/moderate vs poor R 0.69 (0.46-1.05) 0.09 0.57 (0.35-0.93) 0.06
Measurable disease
 Yes vs No R 0.36 (0.19-0.67) 0.001 0.42 (0.21-0.85) 0.01 0.36 (0.19-0.67) 0.001 0.39 (0.19-0.79) 0.009
Number of metastatic sites
 0-1 vs ≥ 2 R 0.63 (0.40-1.0) 0.049 0.70 (0.43-1.13) 0.14 0.61 (0.37-0.99) 0.048 0.59 (0.34-1.02) 0.06
Second-line chemotherapy
 With vs without trastuzumab R 0.51 (0.33-0.79) 0.002 0.56 (0.35-0.89) 0.01 0.44 (0.27-0.73) 0.002 0.47 (0.28-0.79) 0.004

Abbreviations: R, reference; HR, hazard ratio; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.

Multivariate analysis was performed on variables potentially predictive of the risk of disease progression or death in univariate analysis (threshold, 5%).

For PFS and OS multivariate analysis, 7 patients were excluded because they had at least one missing data among the variables selected on univariate analysis; finally, 97 patients were selected for multivariate analysis.

A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.