Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul;30(3):217–222. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000432

General Anesthesia and Young Brain: What is new?

Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic 1, Ansgar Brambrick 2
PMCID: PMC5732095  NIHMSID: NIHMS859124  PMID: 28622158

Abstract

Considering that growing population of very young children is exposed to general anesthesia every year, it is of utmost importance to understand how and whether such practice may affect the development and growth of their very immature and vulnerable brains. Compelling evidence from animal studies suggests that an early exposure to general anesthesia is detrimental to normal brain development leading to structural and functional impairments of neurons and glia, and long-lasting impairments in normal emotional and cognitive development. Although the evidence from animal studies is overwhelming and confirmed across species examined from rodents to non-human primates, the evidence from human studies is inconsistent and not conclusive at present. In this review we focus on new developments in animal studies of anesthesia-induced developmental neurotoxicity and summarize recent clinical studies while focusing on outcome measures and exposure variables in terms of their utility for assessing cognitive and behavioral development in children.

I. Introduction

Mounting preclinical findings published over the past decade confirm the compelling evidence presented in the initial animal studies where the exposure to commonly used gaseous and intravenous GAs induces developing neurons to undergo widespread neuroapoptosis ultimately resulting in their demise (Jevtovic-Todorovic et al., 2003; Yon et al., 2005; 2006; Head et al., 2009). Concerning was the demonstration of significant cognitive and behavioral impairments later in life not only in animals (Jevtovic-Todorovic et al., 2003; Fredriksson et al., 2004; 2007; Viberg et al., 2008; Shu et al., 2012; Boscolo et al., 2012; 2013) but possibly in humans as well (Wilder et al., 2009; Sprung et al., 2012; Block et al., 2012; Ing et al., 2014). Although the causality between neuro-morphological damage and behavioral sequelae could not be established with certainty, concerns were raised regarding the safety of GAs, a class of agents that once were considered to be safe for the young brain.

In view of the fact that there is a large body of information available in this area of research, our review will focus on two important and rapidly growing bodies of work: very recent studies of anesthesia-induced epigenetic modulations during critical stages of mammalian brain development and mounting evidence of anesthesia-induced developmental neurotoxicity in non-human primates. Since definitive proof of anesthesia-induced impairments of synaptogenesis and long-term behavioral sequelae may not be possible in humans considering the complexity of the phenomenon, non-human primate studies are quickly becoming invaluable in getting us a step closer to understanding potential relevance of currently availbale animal data to humans.

II. Neuromodulatory Changes from Anesthetic Exposure in the developing Brain

A. Neuronal Development and Activity

During early stages of brain development neurons undergo intense maturation and differentiation while actively migrating to their final destination in order to establish functional circuitries crucial for proper behavioral and cognitive development. Of particular interest for this review is the developmental period referred to as synaptogenesis which is marked by intense branching of dendritic processes and the formation of numerous synaptic contacts. Although the exact timing of developmental synaptogenesis in mammalian species is not easy to decipher and it varies from one species to another, it is believed that the critical stages in humans occur during the last trimester of in utero life and a first couple (perhaps a few) years of postnatal life. The evidence that neuronal firing and communication are essential for proper formation of neuronal circuitries, which form the foundation for cognitive and behavioral development (Hudetz et al., 2012), suggests that perhaps non-physiological interference with neuronal interactions during the GA state could contribute to enhanced neuronal demise observed in GA-induced developmental neurotoxicity.

B. GA-induced structural modulations during brain development

Over the last decade the scientific community has spent a great deal of effort identifying the features of injury and investigating the cellular pathways that are triggered by anesthetics in the developing brain so that neuroprotective strategies could be devised. Many anesthetic agents have been studied in pre-clinical laboratory experiments, both in vivo and in vitro, and found to have significant neurotoxic potential.

Although the intial focus was on neurons where extensive apoptotic damage was reported, it appears that GA-induced neurotoxicity could be detected in glial cells as well (Brambrink et al., 2015; Lunardi et al., 2011; Culley et al., 2013). For example, oligodendrocytes, which are necessary for myelination in the central nervous system white matter, have been shown to undergo GA-induced apoptosis, both in fetal and neonatal non-human primates (Brambrink et al., 2012; 2015; Creeley et al., 2013; 2014). The observed neurotoxic effects occur at the point of maturation when the oligodendrocytes develop the ability to myelinate axons, suggesting that a deficit in myelination could partially explain GA-associated problems with neurobehavioral development.

When one considers GA-induced developmental neurotoxicity of GABAergic anesthetics it is important to recognize that unlike in adults, GABAA receptor activation during early stages of brain development is an excitatory phenomenon (Rivera et al., 2005; Ben-Ari et al., 2002). Thus, while GABAergic medications are commonly used to treat excitatory conditions such as status epilepticus in the mature brain, it is possible that sustained GABAA mediated excitation may contribute to GA-induced neurotoxicity in the developing brain. The switch from an excitatory to inhibitory GABAA effect is a gradual process that peaks at P7 in rodents and could contribute to the anesthetic toxicity seen experimentally in mouse and rat pup models. However, recent evidence suggests that this switch is likely to occur immediately before birth in humans, and even earlier in non-human primates (Brambrink et al., 2015). Therefore, this mechanism may contribute to neurotoxicity following in utero, rather than postnatal exposure to anesthesia in humans and non-human primates.

C. Modulation of neuronal plasticity

Since proper and timely formation of neuronal circuitries provides the fundamental neuronal network necessary for proper neurocognitive development, axonal and dendritic development are thus key features of early brain maturation. During axonal development, the establishment of axon-dendrite polarity, in which the axon becomes differentiated from the dendrites, is a crucial step in the development of a functional neuron (Kolodkin et al., 2011). Isoflurane, a volatile anesthetic and propofol, an intravenous anesthetic, both have been shown to delay this polarization process and to impair collapse of the axonal growth cone in response to a repulsive cue in an in vitro model of embryonic mouse neocortical neurons (Mintz et al., 2012; 2013). Exposure to isoflurane at higher concentrations or for longer durations was associated with a dose-dependent retardation of neuronal polarization (Mintz et al., 2013). Ketamine exposure has also been shown to impair normal formation of dendrites on GABAergic interneurons, which are crucial for the formation of neuronal networks (Vutskits et al. 2006).

Impaired neurogenesis following early exposure to volatile anesthetics has also been shown to lead to memory deficits. When infant rats and mice were exposed to daily isoflurane anesthesia on four days for 35 minutes each day, they showed progressively severe memory impairments on subsequent testing over the next four weeks. On histologic examination, no increased cell death was seen 24 hours after the last isoflurane exposure; however, the hippocampal stem cell pool was significantly smaller 4 weeks after exposure, and the overall number of hippocampal neurons was lower in the young rodents who were exposed to isoflurane (Zhu et al., 2010). The underlying mechanism and significance of these findings have yet to be determined.

III. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Anesthetic Neurotoxicity

As early as the 1980’s, there were reports of a variety of behavioral impairments was shown to be associated with GA exposure during fetal stages of brain development. Interestingly, in utero exposure of rodents to volatile anesthetics (e.g. halothane and enflurane) caused cognitive impairments not only in the first generation offspring, but also in the second generation offspring never exposed to GA but born to dams exposed to GA in utero (Chalon et al., 1981). These findings suggest that a transient exposure to GA during a critical period of neuronal remodeling perhaps causes epigenetic changes that become embedded in the genetic information resulting in the impairment of proper and timely neuronal development. Could epigenetic modifications from exposure to general anesthetic agents be an explanation for long-lasting impairments in behavioral development observed in numerous animal and emerging human studies?

Behavioral development including cognitive development depends on gene expression which requires access to DNA. Since DNA is highly intertwined with chromatin (Alberini, 2009; Barrett and Wood, 2008) access to DNA depends not only on the epigenetic modulation of DNA itself (e.g. methylation) but very much on chromatin remodeling and histone epigenetic modifications (e.g. acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and sumoylation) that could be impacted by environmental influences. As such, epigenetic mechanisms translate environmental influences into changes in the expression of target genes having significant roles in brain development. The importance of epigenetic mechanisms is gaining significant attention especially in view of the recent findings that some forms of chromatin remodeling were found to be implicated in intellectual disability disorders (Santen et al., 2012; Tsurusaki et al., 2014; Van Houdt et al., 2012) and autism (Neale et al., 2012; O’Roak et al., 2012). Furthermore, the human disease Rubinstein-Tayby syndrome, which is clinically manifested as significant mental retardation from an early age (Rubinstein and Tayby, 1963), was found to be caused by dysfunctional and down-regulated CREB-binding protein (CBP) (Petrij et al., 1995). CBP plays an important role in epigenetic modulation of histones as a histone acetyl transferase (HAT), which acetylates specific lysine residues in histones, thereby generating epigenetic changes that disrupt repressive chromatin structure and promotes DNA transcription. Interestingly, our recent findings suggest that an early exposure to GA causes significant downregulation of CBP leading to hypoacetylated state of histones (histone-3 in particular) which in turns results in downregulation of c-fos and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), proteins considered to be responsible for memory storage and new memory formation (Pascual et al., 2012; Murawski et al., 2012).

Along the same lines, the review of the literature reveals that administration of ethanol, the oldest anesthetic known to mankind, during critical stages of brain development causes significant chromatin remodeling (Guo et al., 2011; Pascual et al., 2012) in the promoters of BDNF and c-Fos. This in turn downregulates their transcription and consequently leads to the impairment of long-term memory (Lubin et al., 2008; Stafford and Lattal, 2011). Epigenetic changes are critical for long-term memory storage. For instance, the down-regulation of CBP protein together with significant reduction in histone acetylation were accompanied by impaired late phase hippocampal long-term potentiation and learning deficits (Barrett and Wood, 2008; Korzus et al., 2004; Valor et al., 2009) similar to those described post-GA exposure (Jevtovic-Todorovic et al., 2003). Furthermore, CBP mutations have been shown to result in reduced CBP protein content and in histone acetylation accompanied by impaired late phase hippocampal long-term potentiation and learning deficits (Korzus et al, 2004; Barrett et al., 2011; Valor et al., 2009). Hence, it would appear that CBP modulation observed after an early exposure to GA or ethanol mimics the one observed with genetic disease diagnosed during early stages of human development such as Rubinstein-Tayby syndrome (Rubinstein and Tayby, 1963).

As a critical contributor to long-term memory storage epigenetic modulations have been suggested for therapeutic purposes. For example, inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC), which removes acetyl groups from lysines on histone tails and increases histone acetylation has been employed in some therapeutic strategies. Through histone hyperacetylation, HDAC inhibitors increase the expression of many genes, thus enhancing new memory formation (Lubin et al., 2008; Stafford and Lattal, 2011) by increasing or ‘normalizing’ histone acetylation which in turn relaxes chromatin structure and improves access to transcription factors. Collectively, these findings suggest that drugs or diseases that promote epigenetic modulations could induce long-term molecular signals leading to the impairment of neuronal development. Furthermore, a strategic use of global HDAC inhibitors can minimize the genetic influences of GA and reverse some aspects of GA-induced developmental neurotoxicity (Dalla Massara et al., 2016). This notion is based on the fact that activity-dependent transcription enables neurons to convert brief cellular changes into stable alterations in brain function that constitute a form of ‘molecular memory’ (Hardingham et al., 2001) hence suggesting that a short term exposure to GAs during critical stages of neuronal activity could be culpable for long-lasting alterations in synaptogenesis and behavioral impairments. Over the past decade HDAC inhibitors have been used in clinical practice in cases where HDAC levels were found to be elevated or there was a need to modify histone acetylation status. Hence, in certain types of cancer the HDAC inhibitors were reported to be an important epigenetic therapy of great benefit as adjuvants (Schobert and Biersack, 2017). Many of them have been approved by the FDA (Raynal et al., 2017) and have well-described pharmacological, pharmacokinetic and safety profiles with well-defined therapeutic index, dosing and side-effect characteristics. Hence, the use of the HDAC inhibitors as adjuvants to commonly-used GAs in cases where a child may need prolonged exposure to GA but has excessively elevated basal HDAC levels or perhaps low level of acetylated histones may not be an unreasonable option.

Interestingly newly available evidence suggests a link between epigenetic alteration and apoptotic cell dying process. Specifically, down-regulation of CBP protein expression we and others have reported could be due to CBP degradation to fragments known to have impaired HAT activity (Shen et al., 2001). Although the exact mechanism of CBP fragmentation remains to be determined, activation of apoptotic cascades, in particular, the activation of caspase-6, was shown to increase CBP cleavage, suggesting that CBP is very sensitive to apoptotic activation (Rouaux et al. 2011). Considering that GA exposure during critical stages of synaptogenesis results in substantial apoptotic activation as shown previously (Jevtovic-Todorovic et al., 2003) and increase in fragmentation of lamin (Dalla Massara et al., 2016), a substrate of activated caspase-6, we have proposed that GA-induced epigenetic changes manifested as CBP fragmentation during critical stages of synaptogenesis might be an apoptosis-induced phenomenon. Interestingly, excessive CBP fragmentation has been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease and was reported to promote amyloid accumulation (Rouaux et al., 2003). As stated earlier the issue of neuronal communication and activity during early stages of synaptogenesis is being recognized as an important element of timely and proper formation of neuronal circuitries. Along those lines, it is of no surprise that kinase pathways that drive c-fos and CREB phosphorylation, two transcription factors that control the promoters of many genes important for acquisition and storage of new memories (Kida et al., 2002; Pittenger et al, 2002) could be exquisitely sensitive to GA-induced changes in neuronal activity and communication.

The unique property of many epigenetic changes is that they can be detected long after the initial environmental or pharmacological influences are removed. In many instances, rapid and often transient epigenetic modifications of the immediate early gene family like c-fos and BDNF (Kwon and Houpt, 2010; Hendrickx et al, 2014) have been shown to have long-lasting influence via a variety of activator proteins that bind to the promoters of numerous later response genes, the gens that participate in processes crucial for neuronal development and survival (Sung et al, 2006). Along those lines, a recent work by Wu et al. (2016) has shown that an early exposure of young rats at the peak of their synaptogenesis to isoflurane, an inhaled anesthetic used in clinical practice, modulates histone acetylation and DNA methylation in the promoter region of BDNF (axon IV in particular) thus leading to downregulation of BDNF expression. Interestingly, the authors report that the epigenetic influences of enriched environment resulted in mitigation of the isoflurane-induced changes in BDNF expression. This in turn lead to improved synthesis of synaptic proteins which then resulted in the improvement of the hippocampal synaptic activity and cognitive abilities when compared to isoflurane-treated animals living in the standard cage environment.

In addition to epigenetic modulations that could be observed in the enriched environment there are some inclinations that GA-induced long-term memory impairment could be pharmacologically ameliorated when the histone acetylation status is modulated with the use of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. For example, Zhong and coauthors (2015) have shown that HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A can reverse isoflurane-induced hypoacetylation of hippocampal histone 4 (H4K12) and increase c-fos expression in hippocampus while reversing isoflurane-induced memory impairments in mice exposed to isoflurane at the peak of their synaptogenesis.

There is also evidence that a relatively recently described class of molecules may play a significant role in anesthesia-induced epigenetic modulations and apoptotic damage to neuronal cells. These small ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules, known as micro-RNA (mi-RNA), are non-coding RNA molecules that bind in complexes to messenger RNA (mRNA), downregulating translation or increasing degradation of mRNA strands. When a group of 84 miRNAs were assayed in human embryonic stem cell-derived neurons after exposure to propofol, 20 of them were found to be down-regulated (Twaroski et al., 2014). Of these, several had already been established to have important roles in neuronal differentiation and the regulation of apoptosis (Roush and Slack, 2008; Roese-Koerner et al., 2013); however, one of them -miR-21 was of particular interest due to its well-established anti-apoptotic activity. In order to further investigate the role of miR-21 in GA-induced apoptosis, stem cell-derived neurons were altered to either up-regulate or knockdown the levels of miR-21. When these neurons were exposed to propofol, more apoptosis was seen in the knock-down neurons, whereas the neurons with up-regulated miR-21 were protected from the apoptotic effect of propofol (Twaroski et al., 2014). mi-RNAs may also play a role ketamine-induced neurotoxicity (Twaroski et al., 2015). The effects of GA exposure on miRNA activity is being actively investigated.

All these finding collectively suggest that an early exposure to general anesthesia could be very powerful epigenetic modulator with far reaching consequences on neuronal maturation, proper circuitries formation and behavioral development. If indeed we could gain full understanding as to how an early exposure to general anesthesia becomes embedded in genetic information and how this could be prevented/modified, we could perhaps provide early interventions that would allow safe use on general anesthetics while preventing devastating long term sequelae we and others have been reporting for over a decade.

IV. GA-induced behavioral modulations during brain development

Although numerous rodent studies have reported the association between an early exposure to GA and long-lasting behavioral and cognitive impiarments, more recent evidence with non-human primates suggests that GA-induced neuropathological changes appear to be associated with persistent cognitive deficits and behavioral impairments later in life. For example, prolonged single exposure to ketamine in the first week of rhesus monkeys’ life resulted in significant learning deficits as well as a deficit in accuracy, task performance and response speed notable even at 3 years of age (Paule et al., 2011). More recent evidence from Dr. Baxter’s laboratory have demonstrated that repeated exposure of infant rhesus monkeys to sevoflurane anesthesia (total of three exposures, four hours each) resulted in significant increase in anxiety-related behaviors when examined at 6 months of age suggesting adverse long-term anesthesia effects (Raper et al., 2015). Along the same lines, a very recent evidence where a single 5-hour exposure to isoflurane was compared to multiple exposures (total of three times) confirms that when compared to controls, multiple- but not single-exposed monkeys exhibited motor reflex deficits at 1 month of age and responded to their new social environment with increased anxiety and affiliative/appeasement behavior at 12 months of age. The authors concluded that an early exposure to isoflurane results in long-lasting and detrimental effects on socioemotional development (Coleman et al, 2017). Although in odds with rapidly accumulating evidence regarding the detrimental effects of sevoflurane in non-human primates, one of the studies with Cynomolgus monkeys suggests that perhaps there is no correlation between an early exposure to sevoflurane and long-term learning deficits although the authors report a decresed envinromental behavior when compared to controls (Zhou et al., 2015). While these data cannot be directly extrapolated to human children, they provide important information about the pathophysiology and potential functional consequences of anesthetic neurotoxicity.

V. Conclusions

In this review we have summarized some recently available advances in the field of anesthesia-induced disturbances in the development of the immature brain. As the body of evidence continues to mount, it is becoming increasing clear that the animal data, non-human primates ones in particular, are very suggestive of detrimental effects of general anesthetics on the very young brain undergoing substantial growth and maturation. It is noteworthy though that existing human studies at present cannot completely address the potentially detrimental effects of general anesthesia due to the complexity of the experimental design and the complexity of human cognitive and behavioral development.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the grants R0144517 (NIH/NICHD), R0144517-S (NIH/NICHD), R01 GM118197 (NIH/NIGMS), R21 HD080281 (NIH/NICHD), John E. Fogarty Award 007423-128322 (NIH) and March of Dimes National Award, USA (to Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic). Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic was an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. Additional support was received from the Frontiers in Anesthesia Research Award (FARA 2012) by the International Anesthesia Research Society (to Ansgar Brambrink). The Authors would like to thank Lena S. Sun, M.D. for thoughtful comments and suggestions.

Footnotes

This review is respectfully dedicated to late Dr. John W. Olney, Professor of Psychiatry and Neuropathology whose boundless energy, endless ideas and tenaciousness remain inspiration to those fortunate to call him a mentor and a friend.

References

  • 1.Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y, et al. Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci. 2003;23:876–882. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-03-00876.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yon J-H, Daniel-Johnson J, Carter LB, Jevtovic-Todorovic V. Anesthesia induces neuronal cell death in the developing rat brain via the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways. Neuroscience. 2005;35:815–827. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.03.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yon J-H, Carter LB, Reiter RJ, Jevtovic-Todorovic V. Melatonin reduces the severity of anesthesia-induced apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;21:522–530. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Head BP, Patel HH, Niesman IR, et al. Inhibition of p75 Neurotrophin Receptor Attenuates Isoflurane-mediated Neuronal Apoptosis in the Neonatal Central Nervous System. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:813–25. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819b602b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fredriksson A, Archer T, Alm H, et al. Neurofunctional deficits and potentiated apoptosis by neonatal NMDA antagonist administration. Behav Brain Res. 2004;153:367–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fredriksson A, Pontén E, Gordh T, Eriksson P. Neonatal exposure to a combination of N-methyl-D-aspartate and gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor anesthetic agents potentiates apoptotic neurodegeneration and persistent behavioral deficits. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:427–36. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278892.62305.9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Viberg H, Pontén E, Eriksson P, et al. Neonatal ketamine exposure results in changes in biochemical substrates of neuronal growth and synaptogenesis, and alters adult behavior irreversibly. Toxicology. 2008;49:153–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shu Y, Zhou Z, Wan Y, et al. Nociceptive stimuli enhance anesthetic-induced neuroapoptosis in the rat developing brain. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;45:743–50. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boscolo A, Starr JA, Sanchez V, et al. The abolishment of anesthesia-induced cognitive impairment by timely protection of mitochondria in the developing rat brain: the importance of free oxygen radicals and mitochondrial integrity. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;45:1031–41. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boscolo A, Starr JA, Sanchez V, et al. Early exposure to general anesthesia disturbs mitochondiral dynamics in the developing rat brain. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1086–97. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289bc9b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilder RT, Flick RP, Sprung J, et al. Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:796–804. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000344728.34332.5d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sprung J, Flick RP, Katusic SK, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder after early exposure to procedures requiring general anesthesia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:120–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Block RI, Thomas JJ, Bayman EO, et al. Are anesthesia and surgery during infancy associated with altered academic performance during childhood? Anesthesiology. 2012;117:494–503. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182644684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ing CH, DiMaggio CJ, Malacova E, et al. Comparative analysis of outcome measures used in examining neurodevelopmental effects of early childhood anesthesia exposures. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1319–32. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hudetz AG. General anesthesia and human brain connectivity. Brain Connect. 2012;2:291–302. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brambrink AM, Martin LD, Dissen GA, et al. Poster Presentation: Ketamine Induces Oligodendroglia Apoptosis in Addition to Neuronal Loss in Developing Non-Human Primates. International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS) Annual Meeting 2015. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:S-181. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lunardi N, Hucklenbruch C, Latham JR, et al. Isoflurane impairs immature astroglia development in vitro: the role of actin cytoskeleton. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70:281–91. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31821284e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Culley DJ, Cotran EK, Karlsson E, et al. Isoflurane affects the cytoskeleton but not survival, proliferation, or synaptogenic properties of rat astrocytes in vitro. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(Suppl 1):i19–28. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brambrink AM, Back SA, Riddle A, et al. Isoflurane–induced apoptosis of oligodendrocytes in the neonatal primate brain. Ann Neurol. 2012;72:525–35. doi: 10.1002/ana.23652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Creeley C, Dikranian K, Dissen G, et al. Propofol-induced apoptosis of neurones and oligodendrocytes in fetal and neonatal rhesus macaque brain. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(Suppl 1):i29–38. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Creeley CE, Dikranian KT, Dissen GA, et al. Isoflurane-induced Apoptosis of Neurons and Oligodendrocytes in the Fetal Rhesus Macaque Brain. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:626–38. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rivera C, Voipio J, Kaila K. Two developmental switches in GABAergic signalling: the K+-Cl− cotransporter KCC2 and carbonic anhydrase CAVII. J Physiol. 2005;562(Pt 1):27–36. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.077495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ben-Ari Y. Excitatory actions of gaba during development: the nature of the nurture. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:728–39. doi: 10.1038/nrn920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kolodkin AL, Tessier-Lavigne M. Mechanisms and molecules of neuronal wiring: a primer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(6) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mintz CD, Smith SC, Barrett KMS, Benson DL. Anesthetics Interfere With the Polarization of Developing Cortical Neurons. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2012;24:368–75. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31826a03a6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mintz CD, Barrett KMS, Smith SC, et al. Anesthetics Interfere with Axon Guidance in Developing Mouse Neocortical Neurons In Vitro via a gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Mechanism. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:825–33. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318287b850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vutskits L, Gascon E, Tassonyi E, Kiss JZ. Effect of ketamine on dendritic arbor development and survival of immature GABAergic neurons in vitro. Toxicol Sci. 2006;91:540–9. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhu C, Gao J, Karlsson N, et al. Isoflurane anesthesia induced persistent, progressive memory impairment, caused a loss of neural stem cells, and reduced neurogenesis in young, but not adult, rodents. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:1017–30. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chalon J, Tang CK, Ramanathan S, et al. Exposure to halothane and enflurane affects learning function of murine progeny. Anesth Analg. 1981;60:794–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Alberini CM. Transcription factors in long-term memory and synaptic plasticity. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:121–45. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barrett RM, Wood MA. Beyond transcription factors: the role of chromatin modifying enzymes in regulating transcription required for memory. Learn Mem. 2008;15:460–7. doi: 10.1101/lm.917508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Santen GW, Kriek M, van Attikum H. SWI/SNF complex in disorder: SWItching from malignancies to intellectual disability. Epigenetics. 2012;7:1219–24. doi: 10.4161/epi.22299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tsurusaki Y, Okamoto N, Ohashi H, et al. Coffin-Siris syndrome is a SWI/SNF complex disorder. Clin Genet. 2014;85:548–54. doi: 10.1111/cge.12225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Van Houdt JK1, Nowakowska BA, Sousa SB, et al. Heterozygous missense mutations in SMARCA2 cause Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome. Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nat Genet. 2012;44:445–9. S1. doi: 10.1038/ng.1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Neale BM, Kou Y, Liu L, et al. Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature. 2012;485:242–5. doi: 10.1038/nature11011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.O’Roak BJ, Vives L, Fu W, et al. Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders. Science. 2012;338:1619–22. doi: 10.1126/science.1227764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rubinstein JH, Taybi H. Broad thumbs and toes and facial abnormalities: A possible mental retardation syndrome. Am J Dis Child. 1963;105:588–608. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1963.02080040590010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Petrij F, Giles RH, Dauwerse HG, et al. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by mutations in the transcriptional co-activator CBP. Nature. 1995;376:348– 51. doi: 10.1038/376348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pascual M, Do Couto BR, Alfonso-Loeches S, et al. Changes in histone acetylation in the prefrontal cortex of ethanol-exposed adolescent rats are associated with ethanol-induced place conditioning. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62:2309–19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Murawski NJ, Klintsova AY, Stanton ME. Neonatal alcohol exposure and the hippocampus in developing male rats: effects on behaviorally induced CA1 c-Fos expression, CA1 pyramidal cell number, and contextual fear conditioning. Neuroscience. 2012;206:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guo W, Crossey EL, Zhang L, et al. Alcohol exposure decreases CREB binding protein expression and histone acetylation in the developing cerebellum. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lubin FD, Roth TL, Sweatt JD. Epigenetic regulation of BDNF gene transcription in the consolidation of fear memory. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10576–10586. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1786-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stafford JM, Lattal KM. Is an epigenetic switch the key to persistent extinction? Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011;96:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Korzus E, Rosenfeld MG, Mayford M. CBP histone acetyltransferase activity is a critical component of memory consolidation. Neuron. 2004;42:961–72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Valor LM, Pulopulos MM, Jimenez-Minchan M, et al. Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:796–804. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000344728.34332.5d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Barrett RM, Malvaez M, Kramar E, et al. Hippocampal focal knockout of CBP affects specific histone modifications, long-term potentiation and long-term memory. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:1545–56. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dalla Massara L, Osuru HP, Oklopcic A, et al. General anesthesia causes epigenetic histone modulation of c-Fos and Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, target genes important for neuronal development in the immature rat hippocampus. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:1311–27. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hardingham GE, Arnold FJ, Bading H. A calcium microdomain near NMDA receptors: on switch for ERK-dependent synapse-to-nucleus communication. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:565–566. doi: 10.1038/88380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schobert R, Biersack B. Multimodal HDAC inhibitors with improved anticancer activity. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2017 Feb 5; doi: 10.2174/1568009617666170206102613. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Raynal NJ, Da Costa EM, Lee JT, Gharibyan V, Ahmed S, Zhang H, Sato T, Malouf GG, Issa JJ. Repositioning FDA-Approved Drugs in Combination with Epigenetic Drugs to Reprogram Colon Cancer Epigenome. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:397–407. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shen WF, Krishnan K, Lawrence HJ, Largman C. The HOX homeodomain proteins block CBP histone acetyltransferase activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(7):509–22. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.21.7509-7522.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rouaux C, Jokic N, Mbebi C, et al. Critical loss of CBP/p300 histone acetylase activity by caspase-6 during neurodegeneration. EMBO J. 2003;22:6537–49. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kida S, Josselyn SA, Peña de Ortiz S, et al. CREB required for the stability of new and reactivated fear memories. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:348–55. doi: 10.1038/nn819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pittenger C, Huang YY, Paletzki RF, et al. Reversible inhibition of CREB/ATF transcription factors in region CA1 of the dorsal hippocampus disrupts hippocampus-dependent spatial memory. Neuron. 2002;34:447–62. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00684-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kwon B, Houpt TA. Phospho-acetylation of histone H3 in the amygdala after acute lithium chloride. Brain Res. 2010;1333:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hendrickx A, Pierrot N, Tasiaux B, et al. Epigenetic regulations of immediate early genes expression involved in memory formation by the amyloid precursor protein of Alzheimer disease. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sung YJ, Wu F, Schacher S, Ambron RT. Synaptogenesis regulates axotomy- induced activation of c-Jun-activator protein-1 transcription. J Neurosci. 2006;26:6439–4. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1844-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wu J, Bie B, Naguib M. Epigenetic Manipulation of Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor Improves Memory Deficiency Induced by Neonatal Anesthesia in Rats. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:624–40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhong T, Guo Q, Zou W, et al. Neonatal isoflurane exposure induces neurocognitive impairment and abnormal hippocampal histone acetylation in mice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Twaroski D, Yan T, Olson JM, et al. Down-regulation of MicroRNA-21 is Involved in the Propofol-induced Neurotoxicity Observed in Human Stem Cell-derived Neurons. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:786–800. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Roush S, Slack FJ. The let-7 family of microRNAs. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18:505–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Roese-Koerner B, Stappert L, Koch P, et al. Pluripotent stem cell-derived somatic stem cells as a tool to study the role of microRNAs in early human neural development. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13:707–22. doi: 10.2174/1566524011313050003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Twaroski D, Bosnjak ZJ, Bai X. MicroRNAs: New Players in Anesthetic-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity. Pharm Anal Acta. 2015;6:357. doi: 10.4172/2153-2435.1000357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Paule MG, Li M, Allen RR, et al. Ketamine anesthesia during the first week of life can cause long-lasting cognitive deficits in rhesus monkeys. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2011;33:220–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Raper J, Alvarado MC, Murphy KL, Baxter MG. Multiple anesthetic exposure to sevoflurane in infant monkeys alters emotional reactivity to an acute stressor. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:1084–92. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Coleman K, Robertson ND, Dissen GA, Neuringer MD, Martin LD, Cuzon Carlson VC, Kroenke C, Fair D, Brambrink AM. Isoflurane Anesthesia Has Long-term Consequences on Motor and Behavioral Development in Infant Rhesus Macaques. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:74–84. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhou L, Wang Z, Zhou HZ, et al. Neonatal exposure to sevoflurane may not cause learning and memory deficits and behavioral abnormality in the childhood of Cynomolgus monkeys. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11145. doi: 10.1038/srep11145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES