Abstract
Aim:
Canine babesiosis is an important vector-borne hemoparasitic disease caused by Babesia canis vogeli and Babesia gibsoni, in India. The communication places on record the salient findings of the study directed to detect and characterize the pathogenic B. gibsoni isolates of Kerala state.
Materials and Methods::
A total of 150 dogs were examined for the presence of hemoparasites by light microscopy as well as by PCR targeting the 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni. Hematological parameters were also analysed. Phylogenetic tree was constructed based on Tamura kei model adopting ML method.
Results::
A sensitive and specific polymerase chain reaction assay was developed with newly designed primer pair BAGI-F/BAGI-R for the amplification of 488 bp fragment of 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni. Out of the 150 dogs examined, molecular evidence of B. gibsoni was recorded in 47.3% animals, while light microscopy detected the infection in 26.67% cases. The phylogenetic analyses revealed that B. gibsoni, Kerala, isolate was closest and occurred together with Bareilly isolate. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were the significant hematological alterations in chronic B. gibsoni infection.
Conclusion::
A high prevalence of natural infection of B. gibsoni was detected among the study population. The affected animals showed anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Phylogenetic analysis of this pathogenic isolate from south India revealed the closest similarity with Bareilly isolates.
Keywords: 18S rRNA gene, Babesia gibsoni, dogs, hematology, phylogeny, polymerase chain reaction
Introduction
Babesiosis is one among the most prevalent tick-borne parasitic diseases of dogs in south India, caused by either Babesia gibsoni, the small piroplasm or Babesia canis, the large piroplasm. Canine babesiosis is exhibited in a wide range of presentations from subclinical disease to serious illness characterized by fever, pallor, anemia, jaundice, splenomegaly, weakness and collapse associated with intra- and extra-vascular hemolysis. The large piroplasm is classified into three different phylogenetic groups referred to as subspecies Babesia canis, Babesia canis vogeli, and Babesia canis rossi, of which B. canis vogeli is reported from India. The small Babesia piroplasm in dogs was reported for the first time in India in 1910 [1]. Since then, there exist sporadic reports on microscopic detection of B. gibsoni in India [2-8]. Although B. gibsoni is mainly transmitted by Haemaphysalis longicornis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks [9], the former was reported to be the putative vector in India [10].
Morphologically, B. gibsoni organisms are small (1-2.5 µm) occurring as ovoid or annular forms within the erythrocytes, but three distinct isolates of these piroplasms were reported based on analysis of 18S rRNA gene of the isolates from Asia, United Sates, Africa, and Spain [11]. Nevertheless, molecular detection of the organism has been attempted by very few workers in the country [12-15]. Apart from B. gibsoni, small intraerythrocytic piroplasms such as Theileria equi, Theileria annulata, and an un named Theileria spp. were also reported from dogs in Spain and South Africa [16,17]. Genetic characterization of the small Babesia spp. isolated from four north and north eastern states of India, established ITS-1 and 18S rRNA genes to be useful genetic markers to study the evolutionary relationship of B. gibsoni isolates and reported the existence of atypical Babesia spp. in dogs in the region [13].
The present investigation is directed toward identifying the prevalence of B. gibsoni infection in Kerala, South India using a single step polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol and analyzing the phylogeny of the South Indian isolates based on 18S rRNA gene sequence. The hematological parameters of PCR positive animals are also evaluated in this study to identify the health status of dogs during subclinical infection.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
No ethical approval was required as the samples were collected from animals presented to the different hospitals for treatment/regular checkup.
Sample collection
A total number of 150 client-owned dogs were included in the study. Peripheral blood smears were prepared from the ear tips and stained with Giemsa to identify the presence of hemoparasites by light microscopy. Whole blood samples were collected from saphenous vein in 6 ml K2 EDTA coated vacutainer under aseptic conditions for DNA extraction and estimation of hematological parameters.
Hematological parameters
The hematological parameters of dogs were analyzed using autoanalyzer (Master T, Hospitex international, Italy) and compared with the normal range. Parameters such as red blood cell (RBC) count, white blood cell count, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit, (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), red cell distribution width (RDW), and platelet (PLT) count were estimated.
Isolation of genomic DNA
Genomic DNA extraction was performed by phenol–chloroform method [18] with modifications [19]. The quality of DNA in the final elutes were estimated using nano spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 200 C, Thermo Scientific, USA). Samples which yielded a ratio between 1.7 and 1.9 at 260:280 nm were selected for analysis.
PCR
The PCR was initially standardized by gradient thermal protocol using known positive blood DNA sample as revealed by heavy parasitemia during microscopic examination of stained blood smears. The primers targeting a 488 bp region of 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni were designed using Primer 3 software (www.bioinfo.ut.ee>primer3-0.4.0) based on the corresponding gene sequences of B. gibsoni isolate available in the GenBank. The suitability was checked with sequence manipulation suite software (www.bioinformatics.org>sms2) and specificity confirmed by blast analysis (BLASTntool: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
Gradient PCR was performed in a 25 µL reaction volume containing 2.5 µL of buffer (10×) without MgCl2, 200 µM each of dNTP, 25 pmol each of forward (BAGI-F 5’- TTG GCG GCG TTT ATT AGT TC-3’) and reverse primers (BAGI-R -5’ AAA GGG GAA AAC CCC AAA AG-3’), 2.0 mM of MgCl2, 1.5U of Taq DNA polymerase, and 5.0 µL of template DNA. All the reagents were procured from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). A no template control was included in each run. A gradient thermal cycling program (Bio-Rad T100, USA) with initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (94°C, 30 s), annealing (54°C to 61°C, 30 s) and extension (72°C, 1 min), and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min was adopted. The amplified PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel (Hoefer, USA) and visualized in Gel-documentation system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis
The amplicons were purified using silica gel purification columns (GeneJET, Thermo scientific), sequenced using Sanger’s dideoxy chain termination method and the sequences aligned using Sequencher Version 5.0 (SciGenom Labs Pvt Ltd, Cochin). Bidirectional sequencing was done with both forward and reverse primers. The sequences were aligned using EMBOSS (www.bioinformatics.nl>cgi-bin>merger) and blasted using NCBI BLAST tool (www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov>blast) to analyze their similarity with other published sequences available in online databases. Sequences corresponding to partial 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni were downloaded from online databases and aligned with the corresponding partial sequence of B. gibsoni obtained in this study and were further utilized for the construction of phylogenetic tree using maximum likelihood method. The bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 1000 replicates, in Dambe 5.5.24.
Results
PCR was standardized for amplifying partial region of 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni by gradient protocol using newly designed primers (BAGI-F and BAGI-R). A bright band of size between 400 and 500 bp was observed in all annealing temperatures between 54°C and 61°C using known positive control DNA. Alignment of the bidirectional nucleotide sequences of the product yielded a 488 bp sequence which revealed 99% similarity with corresponding published sequences of B. gibsoni. There was no significant similarity with any other species of Babesia, thus confirming the identity of the small intraerythrocytic piroplasms of this genus among dogs in Kerala as B. gibsoni. The sequence was submitted to GenBank and assigned with accession number KX766396. The specificity of the designed primers was also well ascertained by the absence of cross-amplification with DNA of common hemoparasites in south India, namely, B. canis, Ehrlichia canis, Trypanosoma evansi, or Dirofilaria spp. available in the Department of Veterinary Parasitology of this institution. Sensitivity of the primers was determined based on the amplification of serially diluted DNA of known positive controls amplified at an annealing temperature of 59°C. Distinct amplicons were observed up to 10−6 dilution of template DNA (2.935 pg DNA) (Figure-1).
Out of the 150 dogs, 71 (47.33%) were found to be PCR positive for B. gibsoni, while only 40 were blood smear positive. The higher prevalence detected by PCR indicated the presence of subclinical/chronic status of infection among a significant proportion of study population.
The phylogenetic tree based on maximum likelihood method with Tamura-Nei model using 18S rRNA gene sequences with Plasmodium falciparum as outgroup species is presented in Figure-2. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that Kerala isolate of B. gibsoni was closest with Bareilly isolate (KC811801) and occurred as a single clade. This clade was closest and could be observed as a sister clade of other Indian isolates, i.e., Assam isolate (KC 811802) and Kolkata isolate (KC 811803). However, the Kerala isolate was farthest from the Punjab (KC 954653) to Ludhiana isolate (KF 511955).
The hematological parameters of dogs that were PCR positive for B. gibsoni without any evidence of parasitemia in stained peripheral blood smear were analyzed (Table-1). The results suggested that the PCR positive animals exhibited a near normal leukogram while the erythrogram values were below the normal range. The hematological alterations of decreased RBC, Hb, and HCT suggested that all animals were anemic. Anisocytosis was suggested by the high values of RDW. Severe thrombocytopenia was also observed in B. gibsoni positive animals.
Table-1.
Parameters | Minimum | Maximum | Mean±SE | Normal |
---|---|---|---|---|
WBC (103/µl) | 5.2 | 38.4 | 16.26±4.00 | 6-17 |
LYM% | 6.3 | 62.8 | 22.95±6.401 | 12-30 |
MON% | 1.3 | 12.5 | 4.95±1.259 | 3-10 |
GRA% | 34.6 | 92.4 | 72.1±6.711 | 60-74 |
RBC (106/µl) | 0.46 | 4.04 | 2.84±0.497 | 5.5-8.5 |
Hb (g/dl) | 1.3 | 11.9 | 7.57±1.45 | 12-18 |
HCT (%) | 3.5 | 28.8 | 18.625±3.249 | 37-55 |
MCV (µm3) | 55 | 76.1 | 66.97±2.633 | 60-77 |
MCH (pg) | 15.8 | 32.1 | 26.8±1.9361 | 19-25 |
MCHC (g/dl) | 26.8 | 51.5 | 40±2.64 | 30-36 |
RDW (%) | 11.1 | 19.2 | 15.37±1.123 | 11-14 |
PLT (103/µl) | 19 | 89 | 50.62±8.333 | 160-525 |
MPV (µm3) | 5 | 8.1 | 6.37±0.3282 | 7-13 |
PCT (%) | 0.011 | 0.058 | 0.033±0.0060 | 0.150-0.390 |
WBC=White blood cell count, RBC=Red blood cell, Hb=Hemoglobin, HCT=Hematocrit, MCV=Mean corpuscular volume, RDW=Red cell distribution width, PLT=Platelet, MCH=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, MPV=Mean platelet volume, PCT=Plateletcrit
Discussion
A sensitive and specific PCR protocol for detection of B. gibsoni was standardized using novel primers. The primers could detect infection with low as 2.935 pg template DNA in ethidium bromide stained gels without any nonspecific products. This also suggests the suitability of the protocol for assessing the clearance after chemotherapy, which is especially important with B. gibsoni, as combinations therapies to eliminate this infection were mostly encountered with either remission or low recovery rates [20,21]. The absence of amplification with the DNA of the most common hemoparasites of dogs in Kerala established the specificity of the primer and the protocol. A significant proportion of dogs (47.33%) were found infected with B. gibsoni piroplasm using PCR when compared to conventional microscopy. This clearly demonstrated that PCR is more sensitive than light microscopic examination of stained blood smear [22]. The higher prevalence detected by PCR indicated the presence of subclinical/chronic status of infection among a significant proportion of study population. Jefferies et al. [23] had also observed that chronic phase of B. gibsoni infection fail to reveal parasitemia in blood smear and could be confirmed by PCR. Subsequent to the first report on natural infections of B. gibsoni in dogs in Kerala [5], the decade has witnessed a sharp rise in the prevalence of the organism in the state. The reports of the incidence of B. gibsoni among dogs in the state were based on the results of conventional microscopy until [24] provided molecular evidence of B. gibsoni in dogs in Thrissur following the protocol of Birkenheuer et al. [25] utilizing semi-nested PCR targeting the 18S rRNA gene. Reports suggest that B. gibsoni infection was predominant in dogs in North India [26] and in Chennai [27] while the prevalence of the organism was lower than B. canis in Pakistan [28]. The increased prevalence in the recent years in Kerala could be the result of complex interaction of factors such as climate, habitat management change, increased tick abundance, and distribution. This has necessitated molecular characterization of the small piroplasms of the state.
Molecular characterization of B. gibsoni based on 18S rRNA gene sequence was effective in differentiating the various genotypes of the organism [13,29]. Apart from employing small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence, heat shock protein [30] and B. gibsoni thrombospondin-related adhesive protein [31] were also reported to be useful for phylogenetic analysis of B. gibsoni. Sequencing of the PCR product obtained with newly designed primer pairs (BAGIF and BAGIR) yielded a 488 bp sequence of 18S r RNA gene which revealed 99% similarity with several corresponding sequences of B. gibsoni available in online databases. The phylogenetic tree based on partial 18S rRNA gene revealed that Kerala isolate was closest to Bareilly isolate (B. gibsoni Asian genotype) and farthest from the two isolates from North Indian states, namely, Punjab and Ludhiana. Singh et al. [31] had observed that B. gibsoni endemic in dogs in India and Bangladesh formed a distinct genetic clade.
Animals that were PCR positive without any intraerythrocytic organisms being detectable during blood smear examination were targeted for the analysis of hematological parameters, to provide information on the subclinical/chronic status of B. gibsoni among naturally infected dogs. The comparison of mean values with the normal range reported by Meinkoth et al. [32], revealed that anemia and thrombocytopenia were evident in chronic infections of B. gibsoni. Hemolysis of infected erythrocytes due to direct parasite-induced damage has been a well-documented finding of canine babesiosis [33]. The unaltered MCV demonstrated a normocytic anemia. Increased RDW indicated anisocytosis and was considered more sensitive than MCV in detecting early changes in theses cell populations [34]. Anemic changes despite detectable parasitemia correlated with the observations of Brown et al. [35], who suggested that severity of anemia was seldom proportional to magnitude of the peripheral parasitemia and oxidative and immune-mediated injury also contributed to the erythrocyte loss. Thrombocytopenia in B. gibsoni infection was associated with an immune-mediated phenomenon involving the binding of IgG to the PLT surface followed by removal of PLTs [20,36] or due to the release of inflammatory mediators during RBC lysis [37]. In this context, significant hematological alterations in the absence of detectable parasites in conventional microscopy throws light on the pathogenicity of chronic infections of small Babesia species which demands the use of sensitive PCR protocol for quick detection of the infection to select timely treatment options. Future investigations need be directed toward exploring the possibility of these hematologic alterations to be used as phenotypic markers of B. gibsoni infection which could be adopted infield practice. In the light of increasing prevalence of this species in this state, there is an urgent need to evaluate the genotypes of this isolates to further explore the molecular epidemiology of this infection as well as to assess the novel therapeutic protocols for complete clearance of parasite in the hosts.
Conclusion
The increasing prevalence of small Babesia piroplasm in Kerala, South India, was documented with the aid of a sensitive and specific PCR protocol amplifying a 488 bp sequence of 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni. The Kerala isolate shared closest evolutionary relationship with a North Indian (Bareilly) isolate which was reported as Asian genotype. The protocol could effectively amplify the specific gene fragment during chronic/subclinical phase of infection. This phase of infection was characterized by severe anemia, anisocytosis, thrombocytopenia, and a near normal leukogram even without detectable parasitemia in peripheral blood smears suggesting the high pathogenicity of the parasite. The alarmingly high prevalence of pathogenic small Babesia among canines of the state necessitates further trials to validate novel treatment modules and genotype variations.
Authors’ Contributions
KJJ and JEP have performed the molecular part of the work, BL has designed the study and drafted the manuscript, KS has performed hematological analysis and TA has critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Government of Kerala, for providing financial assistance through the State Plan funds 15-16 (RSP/15-16/VI-10) and to Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, for the technical support.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Patton W.S. Preliminary report on a new piroplasm (Piroplasma gibsoni sp. nov.) found in the blood of the hounds of the Madras hunt and subsequently discovered in the blood of the jackal Canis aureus. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1910;3:274–280. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mitra K, Ghosh G, Chattopadhya A.P, Banerjee D, Chowdhury S.P.C. Canine babesiosis. Ind. J. Anim. Health. 1987;26:85. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sundar N, Balachandran C, Senthivelan A. Incidence of Babesia gibsoni infection in dogs in Tamil Nadu. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2004;18:79–80. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harikrishnan T.J, Pazhanivel N, Chellappa J. Concomitant Babesia gibsoni and Ehrlichia canis infection in a dog. Vet. Arhiv. 2005;75:513–520. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sabu L. Canine babesiosis. J. Ind. Vet. Assoc. 2005;7:12–14. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Varshney J.P, Deshmukh V.V, Chaudhary P.S. A clinical study of tick-borne diseases in puppies. Intas Polivet. 2009;10:387–391. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Karunakaran S, Pillai U.N, Sasidharan H.P. Babesia gibsoni infection in a German shepherd dog. Vet. World. 2011;4:269–270. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tresamol P.V, Pillai U.N, Anumol J, Devada K, Saseendranath M.R. Cerebral babesiosis due to Babesia gibsoni in a dog-a case report. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2013;44:85–86. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Solano-Gallego L, Baneth G. Babesiosis in dogs and cats-expanding parasitological and clinical spectra. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;181:48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shaw S.E, Day M.J, Birtles R.J, Breitschwerdt E.B. Tick-borne infectious diseases of dogs. Trends Parasitol. 2001;17:74–80. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(00)01856-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kjemtrup A.M, Kocan A.A, Whitworth L, Meinkoth J, Birkenheuer A.J, Cummings J, Boudreaux M.K, Stockham S.L, Irizarry-Rovira A, Conrad P.A. There are at least three genetically distinct small piroplasms from dogs. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000;30:1501–1505. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00120-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abd Rani P.A, Irwin P.J, Coleman G.T, Gatne M, Traub R.J. A survey of canine tick borne diseases in and India. Parasit. Vectors. 2011;4:141. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mandal M, Banerjee P.S, Garg R, Ram H, Kundu K, Kumar S, Kumar G.V. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic relationships based on 18S rRNA and ITS1 region of small form of canine Babesia spp. from India. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014;27:325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Singh A, Singh H, Singh N.K, Singh N.D, Rath S.S. Canine babesiosis in North Western India:Molecular detection and assessment of risk factors. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;11:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2014/741785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Augustine S. Morphological and Molecular Detection of Babesia spp. In Dogs in Thrissur, M.V.Sc Thesis Submitted to Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University. 2013 [Google Scholar]
- 16.Criado-Fornelio A, Gonzalez-del-Rio M.A, Buling-Sarana A, Barba-Carretero J.C. Molecular characterization of a Babesia gibsoni isolate from a Spanish dog. Vet. Parasitol. 2003;117:123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matjila P.T, Leisewitz A.L, Oosthuizen M.C, Jongejan F, Penzhorn B.L. Detection of a Theileria species in dogs in South Africa. Vet. Parasitol. 2008;157:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sambrook J, Russell D.W. Molecular Cloning-A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001. pp. 6.8–6.11. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Aravindakshan T.V, Nainar A.M, Nachimuthu K. Extraction of DNA from cattle blood cells. Cheiron. 1998;27:5–6. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matsuu A, Koshida Y, Kawahara M, Inoue K, Ikadai H, Hikasa Y, Okano S, Higuchi S. Efficacy of atovaquone against Babesia gibsoni in vivo and in vitro. Vet. Parasitol. 2004;124:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lin E.C.Y, Chueh L.L, Lin C.N, Hsieh L.E, Su B.L. The therapeutic efficacy of two antibabesial strategies against Babesia gibsoni. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;186:159–164. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bose R, Jorgensen W.K, Dalgliesh R.J, Friedhoff K.T, de Vos A.J. Current state and future trends in the diagnosis of babesiosis. Vet. Parasitol. 1995;57:61–74. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)03111-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jefferies R, Ryan U.M, Irwin P.J. Development of a nested PCR-RFLP for the detection and differentiation of the canine piroplasm species and its use with filter paper-based technologies. Vet. Parasitol. 2007;14:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Augustine S, Sabu L, Lakshmanan B. Molecular identification of Babesia spp. in naturally infected dogs of Kerala, South India. J. Parasit. Dis. 2017;41:459–462. doi: 10.1007/s12639-016-0827-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Birkenheuer A.J, Levy M.G, Breitschwerdt E.B. Development and evaluation of seminested PCR for detection and differentiation of Babesia gibsoni (Asian genotype) and B.canis DNA in canine blood samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:4172–4177. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4172-4177.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chaudhuri S, Varshney J.P. The prevalence of canine babesiosis amongst dogs reffered at referral veterinary polyclinic of Indian veterinary research institute. Ann. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2017;4:53–63. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kumar K.S, Vairamuthu S, Kathiresan D. Prevalence of haemoprotozoans in canines in Chennai city. Tamil Nadu J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2009;5:104–108. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ahmad S.S, Khan M.S, Khan M.A. Prevalence of canine babesiosis in Lahore, Pakistan. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2007;17:11–13. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Trapp S.M, Messick J.B, Vidotto O, Jojima F.S, de Morais H.S.A. Babesia gibsoni genotype Asia in dogs from Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2006;141:177–180. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yamasaki M, Inokuma H, Sugimoto C, Shaw S.E, Aktas M, Yabsley M.J, Yamato O, Maede Y.C. Comparison and phylogenetic analysis of the heat shock protein 70 gene of Babesia parasites from dogs. Vet. Parasitol. 2007;145:217–227. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh M.N, Raina O.K, Sankar M, Rialch A, Tigga M.N, Kumar G.R, Banerjee P.S. Molecular detection and genetic diversity of Babesia gibsoni in dogs in India. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016;41:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Meinkoth J.H, Kocan A.A, Loud S.D, Lorenz M.D. Clinical and hemotologic effects of experimental infection of dogs with recently identified Babesia gibsoni-like isolates from Oklahoma. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2002;220:185–189. doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Irwin P.J. Canine babesiosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2010;40:1141e–1156e. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schalm O.W, Jain N.C, Carroll E.J. Veterinary Haematology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lea and Febiger; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brown A.L, Shiel R.E, Irwin P.J. Clinical, haematological, cytokine and acute phase protein changes during experimental Babesia gibsoni infection of beagle puppies. Exp. Parasitol. 2015;157:185–196. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wilkerson M.J, Shuman W, Swist S, Harkin K, Meinkoth J, Kocan A.A. Platelet size, platelet surface-associated IgG, and reticulated platelets in dogs with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2001;30:141–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165x.2001.tb00423.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lobetti R.G. Canine babesiosis. Compend Contin Educ Pract. Vet. 1998;20:418–430. [Google Scholar]