Abstract
Aim:
The small ruminant lentiviruses are known to cause maedi-visna (MV) and caprine arthritis - encephalitis in sheep and goats, typically affecting joints, udder, lungs, and the central nervous system. The diagnosis usually involves serology, clinical signs, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the present study, the histopathologically positive pneumonia cases of MV were confirmed by PCR in lung tissue probably for the first time in India.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 888 lungs of adult sheep, aged between 2 and 5 years, were screened during slaughter, of which 121 were found to have pneumonic lesions. The tissues from each pneumonic lung including associated lymph nodes were collected in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathology. The frozen tissues of the same were also collected and stored at −20°C for PCR confirmation.
Results:
Three of 121 cases of pneumonic lungs of sheep revealed gross and histopathological lesions suggestive of maedi or ovine progressive pneumonia infection. These 3 cases were further confirmed by PCR technique that amplified 291-base pair DNA in the long terminal repeat sequence of MV provirus.
Conclusion:
This study suggests the low occurrence of MV virus (MVV) infection in India in naturally affected sheep based on pathomorphological lesions and using the molecular tool of PCR detection of the virus in tissues. Further, a combination of pathomorphology or/and PCR testing might be optimal for detecting the animals infected with MVV.
Keywords: histopathology, maedi-visna, ovine progressive pneumonia, polymerase chain reaction, small ruminant lentiviruses
Introduction
Small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLVs), under the Retroviridae family, mostly cause maedi-visna (MV) disease in sheep and caprine arthritis encephalitis disease in goats. Most of the lentiviruses infection is restricted to host, but SRLV can infect other closely related wild small ruminants, namely, red deer, roe deer, and mouflon [1,2]. MV disease is a chronic progressive and persisting infection affecting multiorgans such as lungs, mammary glands, joints, and the central nervous system [3-5]. After a prolonged incubation period, the virus causes chronic degenerative changes of smooth muscle hyperplasia (lungs), demyelination in central nervous system, indurations of udder, and proliferative synovial membrane changes (joints) [6].
Meadi-visna virus (MVV) mainly targets blood monocytes/macrophage and dendritic cell, but other cells such as epithelial cell and mammary gland also act as a reservoir of the virus and free virus in colostrum may transmit from dam to offspring. The virus becomes restricted to replication in blood monocytes but when virus through lymph node transmitted to systemic circulation it multiplies in mature tissue macrophage of the lung, mammary gland, and joint [7]. Once an animal becomes infected with MVV, the virus integrates into leukocyte DNA, and the affected animal harbors the virus for a lifetime. The burden of virus differs among individual animals; on the other hand, both asymptomatic and symptomatic animals can transmit MVV [6,8]. Maedi is diagnosed by progressive interstitial pneumonia, and visna is generally associated with meningoencephalitis. These names are Icelandic: Maedi means dyspnea (respiratory distress) and visna is equal to wasting (neurological sign); these terms arose from the early investigations of these diseases in the 1940s from Iceland. Maedi has been reported from worldwide except for Australia and New Zealand [5,9]. Transmission of the virus occurs mainly through the infected colostrums, milk from infected mother to the lamb, and/or insemination with the use of infected ram semen. Other routes of viral transmission from infected animals to healthy ones involve close contact, contaminated feed, water troughs, or milking machines [10,11]. Some reports recommended that coinfection with ovine pulmonary adenocarcinoma (OPA) amplified the transmission of MVV among sheep flocks [12].
Diagnosis of the SRLVs infection can be made clinically only in a small proportion of infected animals due to the long incubation period of diseases from months to years. Sheep may develop the clinical signs of maedi at about 3-4 years of age [3,7]. In flocks, the disease remains undetected due to the absence of obvious clinical signs. Postmortem detection of a pneumonic form of the disease rests on gross and microscopic lesions, but such lesions are not always confirmatory [13]. Difficulties in the interpretation of MV can arise in tissues with mild interstitial pneumonia, which can resemble those of lungworms or mycoplasmosis [14,15]. Pneumonia due to secondary bacterial infections usually complicates the lesions caused by MVV [16] or OPA [17].
Therefore, in such inconclusive cases, additional laboratory tests are required for confirmation of the disease. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays or virus isolation are reliable and specific tests for diagnosis of this virus. These tests may be particularly useful before the animal seroconverts. MVV is usually cell-associated; the free virus is rarely found in plasma or other fluids. In living animals, viruses can be detected in leukocytes in blood or milk. At necropsy, MVV can be found in affected tissues, such as lung, mediastinal lymph node, kidney, spleen, and brain. MVV can also be detected in alveolar macrophages collected by bronchoalveolar lavage at necropsy [18,19].
This study describes the pathomorphological lesions simulating the MVV and its further confirmation by PCR. The article emphasizes that both lesions and long terminal repeat (LTR)-PCR combination might be optimal for detection of MVV infected animals.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
Due permission was taken for collection of samples from the slaughterhouse.
Sample collection
During the period from August 2015 to April 2016, a total of 888 lungs of adult sheep were screened and 121 pneumonic lungs specimen were collected from different slaughterhouses, located in different parts of India, on the basis of gross lesions (Table-1). These animals aged mostly between 2 and 5 years. The lungs and associated lymph nodes of the affected sheep lung tissues were collected in 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) for histopathology and frozen tissues were stored at −20°C until further examination.
Table-1.
Place | Lungs screened | Lungs specimen collected | Histopathologically suspected for maedi | LTR-PCR Positive for Maedi-visna virus |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bareilly (Uttar Pradesh) | 20 | 6 | - | - |
Gannavarum (Andhra Pradesh) | 50 | 15 | 1 | 1 |
Delhi | 800 | 90 | 2 | 2 |
Postmortem facility, IVRI | 18 | 10 | - | - |
Total | 888 | 121 | 3 | 3 |
PCR: Polymerase chain reaction, LTR: Long terminal repeat
Histopathology
The NBF fixed tissues were cut into small pieces of 0.5 cm thickness and washed thoroughly with water for an overnight before putting in ascending grades of alcohol for dehydration. The dehydrated tissues were cleared in xylene and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 4-5 µm thickness were prepared from paraffin blocks and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E), and duplicate paraffin sections were stained with Masson’s trichrome to demonstrate the smooth muscle hyperplasia in lung tissue [20]. The lesions were examined by a veterinary pathologist to give authenticity of the histopathology reports.
Extraction of proviral MV DNA
The genomic MV proviral DNA was isolated from the frozen lung samples of histopathologically suspected animals mainly sheep using the DNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Catalog No. 69504) as per manufacturer’s protocol and stored at −20°C until used for PCR.
Detection of MV provirus in lung sections by LTR-PCR
A PCR procedure was performed to amplify the LTR sequence of the MV provirus [18,21]. The forward primers (5-TGACACAGCAAAT GTAACCGCAAG-3, and reverse primer 5-CCA CGTTGGGCGCCAGCTGCGAGA-3) were used to amplify a 291 bp fragment of the LTR region of the MV provirus, as follows: Few modifications to the published procedure proved necessary to achieve optimum amplification. The temperature cycling procedure consisted of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s. The cycling was repeated 35 times. Each PCR reaction was initiated with a 5 min denaturation at 95°C and terminated with a 10 min extension at 72°C. All 121 lung samples were subjected to PCR using negative controls. In the negative extraction control, an equal volume of sterile deionized water was used. PCR reactions were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and photographed in Gel Doc system. A sample was considered positive when the 291 bp DNA fragment of the LTR region was obtained in at least one of the replicates.
Results
Pathologic findings
Of the 121 pneumonic lungs samples of sheep, the maedi lesions were encountered only in 3 cases of sheep. Grossly, the affected lungs were heavier than normal, with focal or multifocal swollen nodules, and inflated. The color of the lungs was pink to white. The affected lung tissues were firm and with a somewhat meaty consistency. In two cases, rib impressions were also noticed on diaphragmatic lobes of the lungs. The lesions were found in the diaphragmatic lobes. Various numbers of pale-white granular nodules, 1-2 mm in diameter, were observed on the cut section of the lungs (Figure-1).
Histopathologically, the lung sections showed chronic interstitial pneumonia, characterized by diffuse thickening of the interalveolar septa, mainly due to the presence of macrophages, lymphocytes, and plasma cells. Lymphocytic proliferative nodules were scattered throughout the pulmonary parenchyma primarily surrounding the bronchi, bronchioles, and blood vessels. Sometimes several foci of lymphoid hyperplasia coalesced and formed larger aggregates. The neutrophils were infiltrated in the lumen of some of the alveoli and bronchioles (Figures-2 and 3). The presence of peribronchiolar and perivascular lymphoid cells and smooth muscle hyperplasia of the alveolar wall and terminal bronchioles were the characteristic lesions observed (Figure-4). The hyperplasia of smooth muscles of the alveolar wall and the terminal bronchioles was demonstrated by Masson’s Trichome Stain (Figure-5). The mediastinal lymph nodes showed severe hyperplasia of lymphocytes with moderately expanded and some active secondary follicles with evident of germinal centers (Figure-6).
PCR detection of MVV in the lung sections
Of 121 lung samples screened, 3 cases yielded 291 bp amplicons of LTR-DNA region of MVV by PCR (Figure-7). The same cases were also having the microscopic lesions of MV disease.
Discussion
MV disease causes enormous production losses in small sheep and goats flocks by decreasing muscle mass and milk production [5,10,22]. Therefore, detection of such animals and their removal from the flocks is important to reduce the disease incidence. A definitive diagnosis of MVV can be made on the basis of clinical history, characteristic pathomorphological lesions, serological tests, and molecular tests [11,13,23,24].
Although MVV can infect animal at very early stage of life, MV normally does not appear in young animals except the nervous form, and in most instances, the symptoms and lesions appear in adult animals that are more than 2 years old, and that is why the detection of MV disease in young animals through macroscopic and microscopic examination alone seems to be difficult. Thus, alternative promising tests are looked for the detection of MVV. Serological prevalence of MV disease within a flock may reach up to 90%. However, the majority of infected animals do not develop the overt clinical disease [25] that is why over all conclusive idea of the frequency of occurrence of MV disease remains vague and this needs to be explored out.
In the present study, lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes of 121 sheep obtained from slaughterhouses of different regions of India were primarily screened on the basis of pathomorphology and further analyzed for the presence of proviral nucleotide sequences through an LTR-PCR method for ruling out naturally affected with meadi cases. Alvarez et al. [26] detected MVV seroconversion in lambs’ fed with colostrum from the seropositive ewes using LTRs and pol MVV genes-based PCR primers and found the higher sensitivity of PCR with LTR region-based primers in comparison to other tests. Serological tests were not taken into account in our study because serological based tests before seroconversion pose difficulty in confirming the diagnosis of the disease. However, PCR could be used to identify seronegative animals [13].
In our study, pulmonary lesions of MV-infected sheep were in accordance with the observation of the previous reports [11,24,27]. The dominant feature was generalized lymphoid hyperplasia with excessive peribronchiolar and discrete lymphoid follicles within lung lobules. These lymphoid nodules were frequently related to small vessels, specifically venules, even in peribronchiolar locations [21,22]. Apart from lung lesions, marked lymphoid hyperplasia and acute lymphadenitis were also observed in mediastinal lymph nodes, which were in agreement with the reported literature [28,29]. In all the three positive cases, any bacteria, mycoplasma, or chlamydia were not isolated from the infected lung tissue samples with severe involvement of maedi lesions.
The MVV has the typical genomic organization of lentiviruses which is firstly reversed transcribed into c-DNA that acts as provirus. This provirus becomes integrated to host genomic DNA through means of viral encoded integrase. Proviral DNA, having a gag, pol, and env gene, is required for virus multiplication that is flanked by LTR on 5’ and 3’ end that is why LTR-PCR may give a clear-cut picture of the virus-infected cell. Different PCR techniques have been used for MVV detection in tissue samples with different specificity and sensitivity; however, LTR-PCR method is reported to have high specificity and sensitivity [18,21,29-31]. The PCR detection of MV disease has not been carried out in India.
In the present study, three of all the screened pulmonary tissue (n=121) samples showed histopathological characteristics of MV and were also positive in LTR-PCR with amplicons size of 229 bp, which give a confirmative presence of the MV in the infected sheep samples. Thus, the LTR-PCR showed practically the same specificity and sensitivity as histopathology, in the diagnosis of this viral infection. However, our findings slightly differ with the findings of Extramiana et al. [18] in terms of sensitivity. These authors reported that LTR-PCR for detection of the MV provirus DNA had 100% specificity with all the screened samples, namely, blood, milk, and tissue samples of infected sheep, but differed in sensitivity, i.e. 66.7% sensitivity for milk sample and 98% sensitivity for other tissues in comparison to the two serological methods, ELISA, and AGID tests, which may be due to different viral load of tissues. Low virus load is one of the main problems for compromised PCR sensitivity for the detection of MVV [13,32]. However, the use of different PCR protocols or primers or primers from different regions (pol or gag) may be helpful for improving the sensitivity of PCR [33].
The histopathological findings in the present study are in concurrence with earlier reports [11,27,29,34]. Sasani et al. [23] demonstrated similar histopathological lesions of ovine lungs (26.5%) and (8.8%) with a moderate degree and severe degree of involvement, respectively, which showed the pathogen causing maedi disease (MVV) could be one of the pathogens causing chronic to subacute lymphoid interstitial pneumonia. Comparison of histopathological findings and PCR results showed that LTR-PCR is highly specific and sensitive diagnostic tool in detecting the MVV provirus in the lung samples of sheep [18,19,30]. In the present study, the frequency of occurrence of MV at abattoir was 2.47% (3 cases of 121 cases), which is akin to the previous reports that vary from 0.27% to 4.15% [24,29,35-37].
Conclusion
The present study describes the histopathological and PCR-based detection of the advanced cases of maedi in which lymphoproliferative interstitial pneumonia and proviral DNA were detected in sheep lung samples. Pathomorphology alone poses difficulty in diagnosing those cases in which apparent lesions are not developed. Thus, a combination of pathomorphology or and PCR testing might be optimal for detecting the animals infected with MVV.
Authors’ Contributions
RS and PK planned and accomplished the overall research work. RS, SK, and GK collected the samples and did the research works. VS and MS helped in the result analysis and drafted the manuscript. KD, KPS, and JPY revised the manuscript. All authors participated to the redaction of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Director and Joint Director (Research) of the Institute (ICAR-Indian veterinary research institute) for providing the funds and facilities to carry out this work.
The work was carried out under the institute funded project vide grant no. IVRI/PATH/14-17/007.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Minardi C.J.C, Singh D.K, Lamara A, Chebloune Y. Small ruminant Lentiviruses (SRLVs) break the species barrier to acquire new host range. Viruses. 2013;5:1867–1884. doi: 10.3390/v5071867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sanjosé L, Crespo H, Blatti-Cardinaux L, Glaria I, Martínez-Carrasco C, Berriatua E, Amorena B, Andrés D, Bertoni G, Reina R. Post-entry blockade of small ruminant Lentiviruses by wild ruminants. Vet. Res. 2016;1:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13567-015-0288-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Narayan O, Clements J.E. Biology and pathogenesis of Lentiviruses. A review article. J. Gen. Virol. 1989;70:1617–1639. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-70-7-1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hananeh W, Barhoom S. Outbreak of maedi-visna in sheep and goats in Palestine. Appl. Sci. J. 2009;7:19–23. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Minguijón E, Reina R, Pérez M, Polledo L, Villoria M, Ramírez H, Leginagoikoa I, Badiola J.J, García-Marín J.F, de Andrés D, Luján L. Small ruminant Lentivirus infections and diseases. Vet. Microbiol. 2015;181:75–89. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ramírez H, Reina R, Amorena B, Andrés D.D, Martínez H.A. Small ruminant Lentiviruses:Genetic variability, tropism and diagnosis. Viruses. 2013;5:1175–1207. doi: 10.3390/v5041175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blacklaws B.A. Small ruminant Lentiviruses:Immunopathogenesis of visna-maedi and caprine arthritis and encephalitis virus. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. 2012;35:259–269. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Herrmann-Hoesing L.M, White S.N, Lewis G.S, Mousel M.R, Knowles D.P. Development and validation of an ovine progressive pneumonia virus quantitative PCR. Clin. Vac. Immunol. 2007;14:1274–1278. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00095-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martin W.B, Aitken I.D. Diseases of Sheep. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2002. pp. 187–191. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peterhans E, Greenland T, Badiola J, Harkiss G, Bertoni G, Amorena B, Eliaszewicz M, Juste R.A, Krassnig R, Lafont J.P, Lenihan P, Petursson G, Pritchard G, Thorley J, Vitu C, Mornex J.F, Pépin M. Routes of transmission and consequences of small ruminant Lentiviruses (SRLVs) infection and eradication schemes. Vet. Res. 2004;35:257–274. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2004014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Christodoulopoulos G. Maedi-visna:Clinical review and short reference on the disease status in Mediterranean countries. Small Ruminant Res. 2006;62:47–53. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leroux C, Cruz J.C.M, Mornex J.F. SRLVs:A genetic continuum of lentiviral species in sheep and goats with cumulative evidence of cross species transmission. Curr. HIV Res. 2010;98:94–100. doi: 10.2174/157016210790416415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Andrés D, Klein D, Watt N.J, Berriatua E, Torsteinsdottir S, Blacklaws B.A, Harkiss G.D. Diagnostic tests for small ruminant Lentiviruses. Vet. Microbiol. 2005;107:49–62. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Georgsson G, Pálsson P.A. The histopathology of maedi, a slow viral pneumonia of sheep. Vet. Pathol. 1971;8:63–80. doi: 10.1177/030098587100800108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.López C.M, Lago N, Viña M, Panadero R, Díaz P, Díez-Baños P, Morrondo P, Fernández G. Lungworm infection and ovine visna-maedi:Real risk factor or a confounding variable? Small Ruminant Res. 2013;111:157–161. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Watt N.J, King T.J, Collie D, McIntyre N, Sargan D, McConnell I. Clinic pathological investigation of primary, uncomplicated maedi-visna virus infection. Vet. Rec. 1992;131:455–461. doi: 10.1136/vr.131.20.455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lopez A. Respiratory system. In: McGavin M.D, Zachary J.F, editors. Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2007. pp. 531–532. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Extramiana A.B, Gonz´alez L, Cortabarr´ıa N, Garc´ıa M, Juste R.A. Evaluation of a PCR technique for the detection of maedi-visna proviral DNA in blood, milk and tissue samples of naturally infected sheep. Small Ruminant Res. 2002;44:109–118. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Preziuso S, Taccini E, Rossi G, Renzoni G, Braca G. Experimental maedi-visna virus infection in sheep:A morphological, immunohistochemical and PCR study after three years of infection. Eur. J. Histochem. 2003;47:373–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bancroft J.D, Gamble M. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. United Kingdom: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008. pp. 5–9. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Benavides J, Garcia-Pariente C, Gelmetti D, Fuertes M, Ferreras M.C, Garcia-Marin J.F, Perez V. Effects of fixative type and fixation time on the detection of maedi-visna virus by PCR and immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded ovine lung samples. J. Virol. Methods. 2006;137:317–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fournier D, Campbell J.R, Middleton D.M. Prevalence of maedi-visna infection in culled ewes in Alberta. Can Vet. J. 2006;47:460–466. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sasani F, Javanbakht J, Hemmatzadeh F, Moghadam M.R, Hassan M.A.M. Evaluation of histopathological on maedi disease with serological confirmation in North-East of Iran. Res. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;1:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Villagra-Blanco R, Dolz G, Solórzano-Morales A, Alfaro A, Montero-Caballero D, Romero-Zúñiga J.J. Presence of maedi-visna in Costa Rican sheep flocks. Small Rum. Res. 2015;124:132–136. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Knowles D.P., Jr Laboratory diagnostic tests for retrovirus infections of small ruminants. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1997;13:1–11. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30361-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alvarez V, Arranz J, Daltabuit-Test M, Leginagoikoa I, Juste R.A, Amorena B, de Andres D, Lujan L.L, Badiola J.J, Berriatua E. Relative contribution of colostrum from maedi-visna virus (MVV) infected ewes to MVV-seroprevalence in lambs. Res. Vet. Sci. 2005;78:237–243. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Angelopoulou K, Brellou G.D, Vlemmas I. Detection of maedi-visna virus in the kidneys of naturally infected sheep. J. Comp. Pathol. 2006;134:329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jubb K.V.F, Kennedy P.C, Palmer N. Pathology of Domestic Animals. 4th ed. Vol. 3. New York: Academic; 1993. p. 653. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Azizi S, Tajbakhsh E, Fathi F, Oryan A, Momtaz H, Goodarzi M. Maedi in slaughtered sheep:A pathology and polymerase chain reaction study in southwestern Iran. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012;44:113–118. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9896-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Brinkhof J.M.A, Houwers D.J, Moll L, Dercksen D, Van Maanen C. Diagnostic performance of ELISA and PCR in identifying SRLV-infected sheep and goats using serum, plasma and milk samples and in early detection of infection in dairy flocks through bulk milk testing. Vet. Microbiol. 2010;142:193–198. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Barquero N, Domenech A, Arjona A, Fernández-Garayzabal J.F, Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria J.A, Gomez-Lucia E. Comparison of two PCR and one ELISA techniques for the detection of small ruminant Lentiviruses (SRLVs) in milk of sheep and goats. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013;94:817–819. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Glaria I, Reina R, Ramírez H, De Andres X, Crespo H, Jáuregui P, Salazar E, Lujan L, Perez M.M, Benavides J, Perez V. Visna/maedi virus genetic characterization and serological diagnosis of infection in sheep from a neurological outbreak. Vet. Microbial. 2012;155:137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zanoni R.G, Nauta I.M, Kuhnert P, Pauli U, Pohl B, Peterhans E. Genomic heterogeneity of SRLV detected by PCR. Vet. Microbiol. 1992;33:341–351. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(92)90061-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Woldemeskel M, Tibbo M. Pulmonary adenomatosis and maedi-visna in Ethiopian central highland sheep:A microscopic study. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2010;42:995–999. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9520-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rajya B.S, Singh C.M. The pathology of pneumonia and associated respiratory disease of sheep and goats. Occurrence of jagziekte and maedi in sheep and goats in India. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1964;25:61–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sharma D.N, Rajya B.S, Dwivedi J.N. Patho-anatomical studies of meningoleuco-encephalitis in maedi of sheep and goats. Indian. J. Anim. Sci. 1976;44:480–484. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ramesh K.P. Studies on pathology of ovine pneumonia and experimental Pastueurella multocida infection in rabbits. Indian. J. Vet. Pathol. 2005;29:153. [Google Scholar]