Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2017 Dec 13;8:1739. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01739

Regulation of Fn14 Receptor and NF-κB Underlies Inflammation in Meniere’s Disease

Lidia Frejo 1, Teresa Requena 1, Satoshi Okawa 2, Alvaro Gallego-Martinez 1, Manuel Martinez-Bueno 3, Ismael Aran 4, Angel Batuecas-Caletrio 5, Jesus Benitez-Rosario 6, Juan M Espinosa-Sanchez 1,7, Jesus José Fraile-Rodrigo 8, Ana María García-Arumi 9, Rocío González-Aguado 10, Pedro Marques 11, Eduardo Martin-Sanz 12, Nicolas Perez-Fernandez 13, Paz Pérez-Vázquez 14, Herminio Perez-Garrigues 15, Sofía Santos-Perez 16, Andres Soto-Varela 16, Maria C Tapia 17, Gabriel Trinidad-Ruiz 18, Antonio del Sol 2, Marta E Alarcon Riquelme 3,19, Jose A Lopez-Escamez 1,7,20,*
PMCID: PMC5733484  PMID: 29326686

Abstract

Meniere’s disease (MD) is a rare disorder characterized by episodic vertigo, sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, and aural fullness. It is associated with a fluid imbalance between the secretion of endolymph in the cochlear duct and its reabsorption into the subarachnoid space, leading to an accumulation of endolymph in the inner ear. Epidemiological evidence, including familial aggregation, indicates a genetic contribution and a consistent association with autoimmune diseases (AD). We conducted a case–control study in two phases using an immune genotyping array in a total of 420 patients with bilateral MD and 1,630 controls. We have identified the first locus, at 6p21.33, suggesting an association with bilateral MD [meta-analysis leading signal rs4947296, OR = 2.089 (1.661–2.627); p = 1.39 × 10−09]. Gene expression profiles of homozygous genotype-selected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) demonstrated that this region is a trans-expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) in PBMCs. Signaling analysis predicted several tumor necrosis factor-related pathways, the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway being the top candidate (p = 2.42 × 10−11). This pathway is involved in the modulation of inflammation in several human AD, including multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or rheumatoid arthritis. In vitro studies with genotype-selected lymphoblastoid cells from patients with MD suggest that this trans-eQTL may regulate cellular proliferation in lymphoid cells through the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway by increasing the translation of NF-κB. Taken together; these findings suggest that the carriers of the risk genotype may develop an NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response in MD.

Keywords: TNFRSF12A, NFKB1, TWEAK/Fn14 pathway, NF-κB signaling, vertigo, sensorineural hearing loss, Meniere’s disease

Introduction

Meniere’s disease [MD (MIM 156000)] is an inner ear syndrome characterized by recurrent attacks of vertigo associated with concurrent ipsilateral aural symptoms, such as fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), tinnitus, or aural pressure (1, 2). MD is associated with a fluid imbalance between the secretion of endolymph in the cochlear duct and the reabsorption into the subarachnoid space, leading to an accumulation of endolymph termed endolymphatic hydrops (3), but the underlying molecular mechanism remains unknown.

Epidemiological evidences support a genetic contribution in MD including: (a) a higher prevalence of MD in Caucasians over other ethnicities (4) and (b) familial clustering, as familial MD occurs in 6–10% of patients with MD in European and Asian-descent populations, respectively, and it has a high sibling recurrence risk ratio (λs = 24–45) (5, 6). Early case–control studies in small series using candidate genes suggested an association with HLA class II genes in different populations (7); however these studies have not been replicated (8). By contrast, a genomic approach using whole-exome sequencing in families with autosomal-dominant MD and autoimmune background has identified rare variants with potential pathogenic effects in the FAM136A, DTNA, PRKCB, DPT, and SEMA3D genes (911). Although these candidate genes for familial MD should be confirmed in sporadic and more families with MD, they start to anticipate genetic heterogeneity.

Different studies have described a MD association with several autoimmune diseases (AD), such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), or psoriasis (12, 13). Based on the results of proteomic studies performed in small series of patients, autoimmunity has been proposed as a potential cause of MD (14, 15). However, elevated immune complexes were only found in 7% of patients with MD (16), and there is no consistent immunological biomarker for the diagnosis of MD. Therefore, the evidence to support the hypothesis of autoimmunity is limited. The TWEAK/Fn14 pathway is involved in the modulation of inflammation in several chronic AD, including multiple sclerosis, SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, or ulcerative colitis (17). However, this pathway has not been investigated in SNHL or MD.

Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is a family of transcription factors, which regulate immune and inflammatory responses. In the latent state, NF-κB is inhibited in the cytosol by IκB (inhibitor of NF-κB) proteins. Upon stimulation of innate immune receptors such as cytokines or toll-like receptors, a series of membrane proximal events lead to the activation of IκB kinases (IKK). Phosphorylation of IκBs releases NF-κB, which translocates to the nucleus to regulate gene transcription (18).

Bilateral involvement in MD (BMD) may occur in 20–47% of patients after 10 years of follow-up (19). Most patients begin with vertigo and hearing loss in one ear, and hearing loss can appear in the second ear several years later, but a significant number of individuals show simultaneous SNHL. Autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED) is a rare disorder defined by recurrent episodes of bilateral SNHL progressing over a period of several weeks or months (20). Vestibular symptoms may be present in 50% of patients and systemic autoimmune disease coexists in 30% of patients (21). This audiovestibular phenotype overlaps with BMD and it may not be possible to distinguish AIED and MD. In some cases, AIED may begin as sudden unilateral SNHL involving rapidly the second ear. Although the mechanism of AIED is not well understood, these patients show elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β and TNFα (22), and may respond to steroid therapy or anakinra (23). Furthermore, autoimmune endolymphatic hydrops was described in patients with Cogan syndrome and polyarteritis nodosa and it was found in 50% of patients with AIED.

The aim of this study was to identify susceptibility loci using the Immunochip genotyping array to define a subset of patients with MD, which may have an autoimmune dysfunction. Here, we found a locus in 6p21.33 and we demonstrated that it regulates gene expression in the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK)/Fn14 pathway and induces translation of NF-κB in lymphoid cells.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Approval Statement

The study protocol PI13/1242, with reference 01-2014, was approved by the ethic Committee for clinical research of all the recruiting centers. All participants gave written informed consent. The work was performed according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975 (as revised in 2013) (24).

Case Definition and Sample Population

Meniere’s disease cases were diagnosed according to the clinical guidelines defined by the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium of the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) (25). All familial cases were excluded.

The initial cohort consisted of 681 cases of MD (492 unilateral and 189 bilateral SNHL) and 735 unrelated controls. The replication cohort was drawn from an independent group of 240 bilateral cases and 895 Iberian controls of European ancestry. The samples included in the discovery cohort were partially overlapped with a preliminary study previously published (26).

The diagnosis protocol included a complete neuro-otological evaluation including otoscopy, a pure-tone audiometry, nystagmus examination and caloric testing, and a brain MRI to exclude other possible causes of neurological symptoms. Patients were monitored with serial audiograms and the following clinical variables were studied in our series: gender, age, hearing stage, duration of the disease, bilateral SNHL, age of onset, type of headache, history of autoimmune disease, smoking, Tumarkin crisis, and the functional scale of the AAO-HNS. Hearing stage was calculated with the audiogram obtained the day of inclusion for each patient with definite MD and was defined as the mean of four-tone average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz according to the AAO-HNS criteria: stage 1, ≤25 dB HL; stage 2, 26–40 dB HL; stage 3, 41–70 dB HL; and stage 4, >70 dB HL.

DNA and RNA Extraction

DNA was isolated from peripheral blood using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of genomic DNA was measured using the Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and concentrations were standardized to 50 ng/mL for genotyping, the quality was determined by Nanodrop 2,000 C (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Total RNA was obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The quantity and quality of total RNA were determined using the RNA Nano assay on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany).

Genotyping and Quality Controls (QC)

DNA samples were genotyped by the Immunochip, a custom genotyping array which includes loci previously associated with 12 autoimmune disorders (27). Clusters were manually inspected and verified, and SNPs with poor clustering quality metrics were removed (call frequency <0.98, cluster separation <0.4, and GenCall scores <0.15). Further, the SNPs that did not meet the following criteria were excluded: minor allele frequency (MAF) <5%, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium <10−4 in controls, non-random differential missing data rate test between cases and controls <10−5, and missing-genotype rate <0.5%. All markers in chromosome X were also excluded. After QC, 96,899 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) remained with a MAF >5% for statistical analysis.

Samples with a genotype success rate of <90% and increased heterozygosity rate (<0.18 and >0.45) were excluded from the analysis. Finally, genetic outliers determined by principal-component analysis (PCA) were removed from the analysis (>3 SD around the mean).

The genotyping of the replication cohort was performed with the TaqMan SNP assay in an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Life Techonologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The alleles were determined using the SDS 2.2.1 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). We used PCA to identify population substructure. Furthermore, a representative sample of SNVs genotyped by the Immunochip was validated also by Taqman assays in 165 individuals. The correlation coefficient between both methods was 98%. Genotype calling was performed in all samples with the Genotyping Module (v1.8.4) of the Genome Studio Data Analysis Software. NCBI Build 36 (hg18) mapping was used (Illumina manifest file Immuno_BeadChip_11419691_B.bpm). Data were converted into the human Build hg38 using.1

Quality controls were performed, for each set of samples and SNVs separately, using Genome Studio Data Analysis Software and PLINK software (version 1.07) (28). After all QC, 189 patients with bilateral SNHL and 735 controls remained for further statistical analyses. We have evaluated the association between each SNV and patients with unilateral or bilateral MD.

Gene Expression Assay in PBMCs

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from peripheral blood of patients with the main genotypes of SNVs rs4947296 by Ficoll gradients (Biowest, Nuaillé, France). After RNA extraction, gene expression levels were quantified using the Illumina HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Probe intensity data were analyzed using Illumina’s GenomeStudio software (Gene Expression Module) to determine the gene expression levels according to negative control probes for background correction and quantile normalization using negative and positive control probes. Probes with detection p-values < 0.05 in less than 10% of samples were filtered, and replicated genes were removed using the median value. Differential expression analysis between samples was performed using the R limma package. Furthermore, we evaluated if the expression of the genes located at <1 Mb distance from the locus and the MHC region were affected by rs4947296 (p < 0.05).

Data from the expression array can be accessed at the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE77865.

Bioinformatics Analysis

Signaling pathway analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA®, Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands2) software. Core analysis tool was executed using the differentially expressed gene (DEG) with an adjusted p-value cutoff of 0.001. The most significant pathway was the “TWEAK Signaling pathway.” Pathway enrichment analysis was performed with MetaCore (GeneGo3) (29), using the DEG with the enrichment p-value cutoff of 0.001. The three enriched canonical pathways “apoptosis and survival Apoptotic TNF-family pathways,” “signal transduction NF-κB activation pathways,” and “apoptosis and survival Anti-apoptotic TNFs-NF-κB-Bcl-2 pathway” were retrieved and the shortest paths from Fn14 (TNFRSF12A) to NF-κB genes were extracted. The shortest paths were visualized in Cytoscape ver. 2.7.0 (30).

Cell Culture

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 106 cells/mL in RPMI 1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 20% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Biowest, Nuaillé, France) and Epstein–Barr virus at 1:1 ratio was added to generate lymphoblasts. Cells were placed in an incubator maintained at 37°C with 7% CO2 and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, non-essential amino acids, and sodium pyruvate.

Cell viability and proliferation assays were performed in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) to investigate the effect of the rs4947296 homozygous conditional genotypes. Five thousand cells were plated in 96-well plates and incubated at different TWEAK (PeproTech, London, UK) concentrations to examine the effect over both cell lines (0, 50, 100, 250, and 500 ng/mL) (31). Proliferation rate was measured at 24, 48, and 72 h. At each time point, 20 μL of PrestoBlue™ (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added to each well and cultured at 37°C for 4 h. After that, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 570 nm in a Tecan Infinite Nanoquant M200 Pro absorbance microplate reader. Blank controls were performed for each measure using medium and PrestoBlue™ (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cell viability assay was performed using Trypan blue staining (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The size of the clusters was measured using the area (μm2) of 200 clusters for each genotype by ImageJ software (ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health).

Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR)

Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR® Green qPCR Master Mix (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and an ABI 7900 HT Fast real-time PCR Systems (Life Technologies, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using primers listed in Table 1. Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 was used as housekeeping gene. Technical triplicates were performed to reduce experimental errors. The fold change for each gene was obtained using the comparative CT method (32). Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Table 1.

Primer sequences for quantitative RT-PCR.

GENE Forward primers Reverse primers
NFKB1 5′-GAAGCACGAATGACAGAGGC-3′ 5′-GCTTGGCGGATTAGCTCTTTT-3′
TNFRSF12A 5′-CTGGCTCCAGAACAGAAAGG-3′ 5′-GGGCCTAGTGTCAAGTCTGC-3′
LFA-1 5′-TTGGGGTTTGAAGAAGTCTCAG-3′ 5′-GTGCCTCCCATTGAAGATGT-3′
ICAM-1 5′-GATTCTGACGAAGCCAGAGG-3′ 5′-CCGGGTCTGGTTCTTGTGTA-3′
Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 5′-TGACACTGGCAAAACAATGCA-3′ 5′-GGTCCTTTTCACCAGCAAGCT-3′
FOS 5′-GGGGCAAGGTGGAACAGTTAT-3′ 5′-CCGCTTGGAGTGTATCAGTCA-3′
BIRC3 5′-AAGCTACCTCTCAGCCTACTTT-3′ 5′-CCACTGTTTTCTGTACCCGGA-3′
FADD 5′-GTGGCTGACCTGGTACAAGAG-3′ 5′-GGTAGATGCGTCTGAGTTCCAT-3′
NFKBIE 5′-TCTGGCATTGAGTCTCTGCG-3′ 5′-AGGAGCCATAGGTGGAATCAG-3′
CASP3 5′- GTACAGATGTCGATGCAGCAA-3′ 5′- GCACACAAACAAAACTGCTCC-3′
CASP6 5′- CGATGTGCCAGTCATTCCTTT-3′ 5′- GCTGCATCCACCTCAGTTATG-3′
CASP9 5′- CAGAGATTCGCAAACCAGAGG-3′ 5′- CACCGACATCACCAAATCCTC-3′
APAF1 5′- GCCCTGCTCATCTGATTCATG-3′ 5′- TCTCACTGACTGCACAATCCT-3′
CYCS 5′- AAGACTGGGCCAAATCTCCAT-3′ 5′- TCTGCCCTTTCTTCCTTCTTCT-3′
IKBKG 5′- GATCTCAAACAGCAGCTCCAG-3′ 5′- AGTCCGCCTTGTAGATATCCG-3′

Western Blot

Protein extraction was carried out by acetone precipitation (33). Protein concentration was determined by Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and total protein was stored at −80°C. Sixty micrograms of total proteins were separated by molecular weight in a poliacrilamyde gel [Criterion™ TGX™ Precast Gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA)] and transferred to a Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Midi PVDF membrane by Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Transfer System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was incubated with primary antibody against NF-κB p105/p50 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; #ab7971, 1:400) overnight at 4°C and a chicken polyclonal antibody against GAPDH (EMD Millipore, #AB2302, 1:1,000). Then, the membrane was incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. A goat anti-rabbit (R&D Systems, #HAF008, 1:3,000) and a rabbit anti-chicken (Sigma-Aldrich, #A9046-1ML, 1:9,000) were used, respectively. After that, the membrane was developed using Clarity™ Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and the images were obtained using the ImageQuant LAS4000 (GE Healthcare Life Science). ImageJ software (NIH, USA) was used for the quantification.

Confocal Image Analysis of Whole Mount LCLs

Selected LCLs were obtained from patients with MD according to the genotype. LCLs undergoing TWEAK treatment (250 ng/mL) for 48 h were fixed using fresh methanol: DMSO (4:1) and stored at −20°C until used. LCLs were then rehydrated, blocked, stained, and mounted as previously described (34). Primary antibodies were used as follows: a mouse monoclonal antibody against Fn14 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; #sc-56250, 1:50) and a rabbit polyclonal antibody against NF-κB p105/p50 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; #ab7971, 1:50). As secondary antibodies, we used Alexa-555-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA; #A-21422, 1:500) and Alexa-633-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA; #A-21071, 1:500), respectively. For nuclei staining, we used Hoechst 3342 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA; #H1399, 1:1,000). A laser scanning confocal microscope LSM 710 (Carl Zeiss, Oberköchen, Germany) was used for image collection and the Zeiss browser software program ZEN black edition was used to acquire and export the data. All images were taken with the same laser intensity settings on the microscope and final image processing and labeling were performed with ImageJ.

NF-κB p65 Phosphorylation Assay

Lymphoblastoid cell lines according to each genotype were plated with a density of 1 × 106cells/mL and treated with TWEAK (250 ng/mL) during 48 h at 37°C. After that time, cells were centrifuged and resuspended in an appropriate volume of HBSS containing 5% FBS (Biowest, Nuaillé, France). Cells were then lysed with Cell Lysis Buffer 5× from the NF-κB p65 (Total/phospho) Multispecies InstantOne™ ELISA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and manufacturer’s protocol was followed.

Statistical Analysis

We performed a descriptive statistical analysis for clinical variables, using SPSS software v.22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are shown as means with their SD. Quantitative variables were compared using Student’s unpaired t-test. Qualitative variables were compared using crosstabs and Fisher’s exact test. Nominal p-values using a 5% level to determine significance are reported. Allelic and genotypic frequencies were compared between patients and controls by logistic regression test and calculating the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals using PLINK (version 1.07). Genotypes were imputed and implemented in IMPUTEv2 using the 1,000 Genomes Phase 3 integrated reference panel according to a previously described method (35).

Potential interactions between associated loci were also tested using the association module in PLINK v1.07. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the genotype-specific effects of the risk alleles.

We selected SNVs for the replication study based on the results of the discovery phase and the meta-analysis was performed by SPSS. The functional evaluation of each SNP located in candidate loci was performed in silico using HaploReg,4 which provides linkage disequilibrium information (r2 and D′ measurements) and it allows us to define haplotype blocks in each chromosome used (36). Moreover, we used seeQTL5 and RegulomeDB6 to annotate regulatory variants of the noncoding genome such as enhancers, transcription factors binding sites, their conservation across mammals and their potential effects on regulatory motifs (37, 38).

Clinical variables were compared between patients with unilateral and BMD by unpaired t test for quantitative variables and χ2 test for qualitative variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Bilateral MD Is Associated with a Locus in the Classical Class I Subregion of the MHC

Table 2 compares the clinical features of 1,451 patients with uni and bilateral SNHL in MD. Patients with bilateral SNHL had a longer duration of the disease (p = 1.5 × 10−6), worse hearing loss at diagnosis (p = 2.5 × 10−4), worse hearing stage (p = 2 × 10−6), higher frequency of AD (p = 4 × 10−3), and higher frequency of migraine (p = 6 × 10−3).

Table 2.

Clinical features of patients with sporadic Meniere’s disease.

Variables Bilateral (n = 420) Unilateral (n = 1,031) p-Value
Age of onset, mean (SD) 45.23 (13.6) 47.24 (12.1) 0.263
Gender (% women) 59.3 57.5 0.598
Time course (years), mean (SD) 15.16 (9.1) 10.35 (±7.7) 1.50 × 10−06
Affected ear (%) Right (50.9)
Hearing loss at diagnosis, mean (SD) 56.96 (16.7) 48.66 (19.1) 2.47 × 10−04
Migraine, n (%) 70 (18.4) 131 (12.8) 0.006
History of autoimmune disease, n (%) 63 (19.2) 119 (12.8) 0.004
Smoking, n (%) 81 (21.3) 254 (24.3) 0.422

Hearing stage, n (%)
1 7 (2.0) 117 (12.2) 5.00 × 10−06
2 52 (14.9) 232 (24.2)
3 178 (51.0) 471 (49.1)
4 112 (32.1) 140 (14.6)
Hearing stage, mean (SD) 3.13 (0.7) 2.66 (0.8) 2.00 × 10−06
Turmakin crisis, n (%) 85 (29.5) 126 (16.9) 8.00 × 10−06

Functional scale, n (%)
1 37 (12.6) 167 (12.6) 0.008
2 91 (31.0) 332 (37.1)
3 74 (25.2) 185 (20.7)
4 46 (15.6) 126 (14.1)
5 37 (12.6) 71 (7.9)
6 8 (2.7) 13 (2.7)

Numbers in bold represent significant p-values (p < 0.05).

Although no significant association was found in patients with unilateral MD, two genomic regions at chromosome 2 and 6 reached confirmatory significance (p-values < 10−6) in the subset of patients with BMD (Figure 1). To perform the replication, we selected representative TagSNVs, according to the results of the discovery phase in both regions (Table 3). The meta-analysis confirmed a suggestive significant association with a locus in the classical class I subregion of the MHC ~9 kb at 6p21.33 (31,081,878–31,090,401), being the leading SNV rs4947296; OR = 2.089 (1.661–2.627); p = 1.39 × 10−09. Conditional regression analysis showed no independent associated signals in chromosome 6, and the association between this locus and BMD remained robust when it was adjusted to any variant in the region. So, according to rs4947296, we defined the homozygous risk genotype as CC and the protective genotype as TT for further studies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Two loci associated with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). (A) Manhattan plot for association study findings from Immunochip genotyped bilateral cases and controls. (B) Association area at the region on chromosome 2 and (C) association area at the region on chromosome 6. Both (B,C) −logP values of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) associated with bilateral SNHL are shown on the left y-axis and the recombination rates expressed in centimorgans (cM) per Mb, are shown on the right y-axis. Positions in Mb are on the x-axis (NCBI Build GRCh38). Linkage disequilibrium for each SNV with the top SNV, displayed as a large purple diamond, is indicated by its color. The plots were drawn using LocusZoom tool (http://locuszoom.sph.umich.edu/locuszoom/).

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of loci associated with bilateral Meniere’s disease.

SNV
Phase 1 (n = 189 cases; 735 controls)
Phase 2 (n = 240 cases; 895 controls)
Meta-analysis (n = 429 cases; 1,630 controls)
Chr. Pos. Rs Ref. Alt. RAF_C RAF_N OR (95%) p-Value RAF_C RAF_N OR (95%) p-Value RAF_C RAF_N OR (95%) p-Value
2 102351615 rs4988957 C T 0.414 0.358 1.27 (0.99–1.62) 5.24E−02 0.381 0.355 1.07 (0.93–1.23) 1.88E−01 0.406 0.351 1.16 (1.05–1.83) 2.91E−03
2 102417980 rs11465670 T C 0.156 0.093 1.81 (1.29–2.54) 5.02E−04 0.087 0.083 1.04 (0.73–1.49) 4.41E−01 0.121 0.087 1.38 (1.10–1.73) 4.52E−03
2 102460685 rs4851589 A G 0.337 0.279 1.32 (1.02–1.69) 3.35E−02 0.247 0.258 0.96 (0.79–1.16) 3.61E−01 0.299 0.267 1.12 (0.99–1.27) 4.53E−02
6 30814225 rs886424 C T 0.102 0.051 2.11 (1.39–3.21) 3.55E−04 0.082 0.071 1.14 (0.81–1.62) 2.55E−01 0.095 0.067 1.41 (1.09–1.83) 7.73E−03
6 31083776 rs9380217 C T 0.159 0.069 2.55 (1.81–3.58) 3.40E−07 0.108 0.078 1.43 (1.00–2.06) 5.52E−02 0.132 0.074 1.854 (1.465–2.347) 2.02E−07
6 31090401 rs4947296 T C 0.164 0.067 2.72 (1.93–3.82) 3.15E−08 0.108 0.078 1.432 (1.024–2.004) 3.52E−02 0.142 0.073 2.089 (1.661–2.627) 1.39E−09
6 32082981 rs1150754 C T 0.117 0.061 2.04 (1.38–3.01) 2.66E−04 0.089 0.067 1.16 (0.81–1.65) 2.35E−01 0.096 0.071 1.36 (1.05–1.77) 1.34E−02

Chr., chromosome; SNV, single nucleotide variant; Pos., genomic position; Rs, SNV identifier; Ref., reference; Alt., alternative allele on human genome reference GRCh38; RAF_C, risk allelic frequency in cases; RAF_N, risk allelic frequency in controls; OR, odds ratio.

The rs4947296 Regulates Gene Expression in the TWEAK/Fn14 Pathway in PBMCs

We compared the gene expression profile of PBMCs from 10 individuals according to the rs4947296 genotype (CC vs. TT). We demonstrated that this region is an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) in mononuclear cells, showing significant differences in the expression levels of 973 genes (adjusted p < 0.001, Figure 2A; Table S1 in Supplementary Material). Selecting those genes showing a differential expression according to the genotype, pathway analysis performed by IPA® software, predicted the activation of several candidate pathways associated with TNF (Table S2 in Supplementary Material). The TWEAK/Fn14 pathway showed 31 differentially expressed genes (DEG, 88.5%; p = 2.42 × 10−11). Moreover, the eQTL was also associated with the activation of the Death Receptor signaling pathway with 64 DEG (68.8%; p = 8.45 × 10−11); TNFR2 signaling pathway with 26 DEG (86.6%; p = 2.97 × 10−9), and TNRF1 signaling pathway with 37 DEG (74%; p = 6.69 × 10−9).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. (A) Heatmap of 973 differentially expressed genes (DEG). Samples and genes (columns and rows, respectively) are reordered on the basis of the normalized expression value and give rise to groups of genes and samples with similar expression levels, according to the color key. The samples (column) were clustered into two groups according to rs4947296: three individuals with CC genotype (risk) and seven individuals with TT genotype (protective). (B) The shortest path from Fn14 (TNFRSF12A) to NFKB genes. DEG in mononuclear cells (adjusted p < 0.001), according to the homozygous genotype, were used to predict involved pathways. The network was retrieved from three MetaCore pathways [“apoptosis and survival Apoptotic tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-family pathways,” “signal transduction NF-κB activation pathways,” and “apoptosis and survival Anti-apoptotic TNFs-NF-κB-Bcl-2 pathway”] enriched in our pathway enrichment analysis. Log fold change is color-coded, where red nodes indicate upregulated genes, whereas blue nodes indicate downregulated genes. Activation interactions are indicated by arrow heads, whereas inhibitory interactions are indicated by blunted heads. Black edges indicate physical binding interaction, purple edges indicate phosphorylation, and brown edges indicate ubiquitination. Genes with thick purple margin are DEG. (C) Quantitative RT-PCR validation of genes involved in the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway (NFKB1, Fn14, BIRC3, FADD, NFKBIE, FOS, APAF1, CASP3, CASP6, CASP9, CYCS, and IKBKG) (*p < 0.03, **p < 0.0005).

The enrichment analysis of canonical pathways in MetaCore (adjusted p < 0.001) also resulted in several TNF-related pathways for apoptosis and inflammation that contained TWEAK/Fn14 sub-pathway (Table S3 in Supplementary Material). To gain insight into the possible molecular interactions that mediate TWEAK signaling to NF-κB, we extracted three enriched canonical pathways “apoptosis and survival Apoptotic TNF-family pathways,” “signal transduction NF-κB activation pathways,” and “apoptosis and survival Anti-apoptotic TNFs-NF-κB-Bcl-2 pathway” from MetaCore. The shortest paths from Fn14 (TNFRSF12A) to NFKB1 genes were extracted (Figure 2B) and visualized in Cytoscape v.2.7.0 (30). These shortest paths involved several DEG, including BIRC3 and NFKBIE. Although FADD was not among these shortest paths, it is along the TNFRSF10A-induced path that feeds into the TWEAK/Fn14 path, suggesting its complementary role in the TWEAK/Fn14 signaling.

We also validated the gene expression profile of NFKB1, TNFRSF12A, BIRC3, FADD, NFKBIE, FOS, CASP3, CASP6, APAF1, IKBKG, CYCS, and CASP9 genes in mononuclear cells from patients by qPCR, according to the selected genotypes (Figure 2C).

TWEAK Induces Cluster Formation and Proliferation in Selected Lymphoblasts

Lymphoblastoid cell lines proliferate forming clusters with rosette morphology due to the expression of adhesion molecules such as LFA-1 (leukocyte function antigen 1 encoded by ITGB2 gene) also known as CD11a/CD18 and its ligand, ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule 1, CD54) in the plasma membrane. Interestingly, the size of the clusters showed significant differences according to the genotype, being smaller for the risk genotype (CC: 30,968.88 ± 1,960.45 μm2; TT: 103,921.33 ± 12,720.92 nm, p = 5 × 10−7) (Figure 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Genotype-conditioned lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) for rs4947296. (A) Proliferation assay of homozygous LCL treated with tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK; 0, 50, 100, 250, and 500 ng/mL) and measured using PrestoBlue™ (*p < 0.05). Comparisons between groups were achieved using a two-sided Student’s t-test. (B) Relative gene expression according to the genotype, after treatment with 250 ng/mL of TWEAK, p-values: TNFRSF12A = 0.44; NFKB1 = 1.36 × 10−4; ICAM = 0.91; LFA-1 = 5 × 10−6; TJP1 = 3.2 × 10−5 (*p < 1 × 10−4, **p < 5 × 10−6) (C) Cluster size within LCLs with and without stimulation (**p = 5 × 10−7, *p = 0.02). CC, risk genotype; TT, protective genotype.

When we treated the cells with TWEAK at a concentration of 250 ng/mL, we observed a marked increase in the size of the risk genotype clusters, which was not observed in the protective genotype (CC: 125,609.84 ± 17,502.21 μm2, p = 2 × 10−6; TT: 136,132.42 ± 14,785.38 μm2, p = 0.02). This experiment shows that TWEAK induces a significant aggregation of LCLs in the carriers of the risk genotype.

Next, we compared the effect of TWEAK in the proliferation of selected LCLs. So, 250 ng/mL TWEAK increased the proliferation rate after 48 h in both cell lines (CC p = 0.017, TT, p = 0.013; Figure 3C). This effect suggests the activation of the non-canonical NF-κB signaling via Fn14 receptor that we confirmed showing an increase expression of TNFRSF12A and NFKB1 genes (Figure 3B).

To investigate if the difference in the cluster formation was related with the differential expression of cell adhesion molecule genes, we measured the mRNA levels of three cell surface markers in LCLs: the integrin LFA-1 and the adhesion molecule ICAM which binds to integrins, as well as tight-junction protein ZO-1 (TJP1 gene), which interacts directly with actin. We found a significant increase in the expression of ITGB2 (p = 5 × 10−6; Figure 3B) and in TJP1 (p = 3.2 × 10−5) in the risk genotype, which was not observed in the protective genotype. The differences in clusters size, ITGB2 and TJP1 expression, according to the genotype, are consistent with the hypothesis that this eQTL could regulate lymphoblasts adhesion and proliferation.

The rs4947296 May Regulate Phosphorylation in NF-κB p65 Subunit on Serine 536 in Lymphoblasts

We measured total and phosphorylated NF-κB p65 on serine 536 in conditioned LCLs to determine if the variant rs4947296 had any effect on NF-κB phosphorylation. Non-stimulated LCLs with the risk genotype (CC) showed a significantly higher amount of total NF-κB when they were compared to cells with the protective genotype (TT) at basal levels (Figure 4A, p = 0.006). Thus, when we compared risk and protective genotypes in stimulated LCLs, we also found significant differences (p = 0.026). However, rs4947296 did not increase phosphorylation on S536 in NF-κB p65 subunit in the risk genotype, and the stimulation with TWEAK itself, did not increase NF-κB p65 phosphorylation in LCL (Figure 4B, for both comparisons, p > 0.05).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

NF-κB transcription factor protein studies in genotype-conditioned lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). (A) Total NF-κB ELISA performed in homozygous LCL for rs4947296 at basal levels and after stimulation with TWEAK at 250 ng/mL (*p < 0.02, *p < 0.006). (B) Phosphorylation assay for NF-κB p65 on serine 536 in homozygous LCL at basal levels and after stimulation with TWEAK at 250 ng/mL. (C) Representative NF-κB western blot of homozygous LCL before and after treatment with 250 ng/mL of TWEAK. (D) NF-κB western blot showing significant differences between both genotype cells at basal levels as well as differences within the protective genotype cells before and after stimulation (*p < 0.05). CC, risk genotype; TT, protective genotype.

The rs4947296 Upregulates the Translation of NF-κB in Lymphoblasts

Non-stimulated LCLs with the risk genotype (CC) showed a higher expression of TNFRSF12A and NFKB1 RNA (3.6 ± 0.7 and 2.7 ± 0.7 fold higher, respectively) when they were compared to TT LCLs, confirming the previous results obtained in selected PBMC. When we stimulated both cell lines with 250 ng/mL of TWEAK, we found no significant differences for TNFRSF12A; however, the expression of NFKB1 was significantly increased (CC: 10.4 ± 0.8; TT 3.7 ± 0.2, p = 1.4 × 10−4).

This finding was validated by western blot at protein level (Figures 4C,D) finding marginally significant differences when comparing risk and protective genotypes at basal levels (p = 0.05), but not after stimulation. When we compared each group before and after stimulation with 250 ng/mL of TWEAK, we found significant differences in the protective genotype (p = 0.017), but not in the risk genotype (p = 0.49), in accordance with the findings observed in ELISA.

We also performed immunocytochemistry to quantify TNFRSF12A and NFKB1 expression at protein level in LCLs by confocal microscopy (Figure 5). At basal levels, we found significant differences in the translation of Fn14 between both cell lines (CC: 78.5 ± 9.6; TT 48.3 ± 3.7, p = 10−3), but no differences were found for NF-κB (CC: 56.2 ± 4.2; TT 45.2 ± 3.3, p = 0.06). However, TWEAK upregulated the translation of NF-κB significantly in the risk LCLs (CC: p = 0.01; TT: p = 0.04), but it has no effect on Fn14 in neither of LCLs (CC: p = 0.77; TT: p = 0.29).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Fn14 and NF-κB expression in homozygous lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). Confocal microscopy images showing representative clusters of LCLs with Fn14 and NF-κB immunolabeling after treatment with 250 ng/mL of TWEAK. CC, risk genotype; TT, protective genotype.

Discussion

The main finding of this study is that the SNV rs4947296 is associated with bilateral MD. This variant is a trans-eQTL in lymphoid cells regulating gene expression in several genes in the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway and it activates NF-κB, probably increasing the inflammatory response in MD.

Bilateral MD Is a Heterogeneous Disorder Including Five Clinical Variants

Bilateral MD is a severe, disabling inner ear condition, whose diagnosis usually requires few years of follow-up, since it is based on clinical criteria and no biological marker is available for its diagnosis (1). Moreover, BMD is a heterogeneous disorder that includes several clinical variants. A phenotype-driven cluster analysis has defined five subgroups of patients with potentially different etiology (39). BMD type 1 and type 2 are defined by diachronic or synchronic hearing loss, respectively, without migraine or AD; BMD type 3 includes familial MD cases and we have excluded them on this study; BMD type 4 is defined by migraine as a comorbid condition without AD, and BMD type 5 includes all patients with a comorbid AD. Since the prevalence of BMD is around 25% in our cohort and BMD type 5 is found in 11% of cases, we could estimate that the prevalence of BMD type 5 will be ≈1/40,000 individuals. Our results confirm previous studies that supported a significant association between BMD, migraine and ADs (12, 13). Here, we describe a locus at 6p21.33 suggesting association with BMD, being the leading signal rs4947296.

The Variant rs4947296 Associated with BMD Is a Trans-eQTL and Regulates Several Genes in the TWEAK/Fn14 Pathway

Our results show that rs4947296 is an eQTL in mononuclear cells and it regulates the expression of 31/34 genes in the TWEAK/Fn14 signaling pathway (Table S2 in Supplementary Material) and 16/51 genes in the signal transduction NF-κB activation pathways (Table S3 in Supplementary Material). The SNV rs4947296 has been previously described as one the most strongly SNV associated with Behcet’s disease (p < 10−12) in a GWAS conducted in Korean, Japanese, and Han Chinese populations (4042), as well as associated with Graves’ disease in Chinese population (43). Our study confirms that the rs4947296 is a trans-eQTL regulating gene expression in the Fn14/TWEAK pathway in lymphoid cells, and these findings support a role for an abnormal innate immune response in the pathophysiology of BMD. The TWEAK/Fn14 pathway has been involved in skin autoimmune disorders. So, TWEAK/Fn14 activation triggers Ro52-mediated photosensitization in cutaneous lupus erythematosus and involves the activation of NF-κB pathway (44). Furthermore, TWEAK/Fn14 contributes to the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid by reducing BP180 of hemidesmosomes and activating ERK and NF-κB pathways (45), demonstrating a pathogenic effect on the proteins of intercellular junctions.

In addition, TWEAK/Fn14 pathway could also be involved in Behcet and Graves’ disease and it could be a potential target for therapy is these disorders. So, pleiotropy is a common finding in trans-eQTL for autoimmune disorders (46, 47), and SNVs in the HLA region showing trans-eQTL effects were 10-fold enriched (48).

The Variant rs4947296 Regulates NF-κB-Mediated Inflammation in Lymphoid Cells in BMD

TWEAK is a multifunctional cytokine that regulates multiple cellular responses, including angiogenesis, inflammation, cellular adhesion, proliferation, or apoptosis (49, 50). TWEAK activates signals through its receptor, Fn14, encoded by TNFRSF12A gene, which is highly expressed in epithelial cells and induced in several human diseases (51). High levels of TWEAK and/or Fn14 have also been found to be associated with the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (52), SLE (53), multiple sclerosis (54), or neuroinflammation (31). The binding of TWEAK to Fn14 induces both, an acute activation of the canonical NF-κB pathway and a prolonged activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway (49). Furthermore, the non-canonical NF-κB pathway plays a key role in immunity and immune-mediated disorders as SLE (49). Our findings using homozygous LCLs demonstrate that this eQTL upregulates the expression and translation of NF-κB in lymphoid cells and it may influence phosphorylation on S536 in the transactivation domain of NF-κB p65. Although our results were not statistically significant, they showed a trend for the risk genotype.

The non-canonical NF-κB pathway relies on the phosphorylation-induced p100 processing, which is triggered by signaling from a subset of TNFR members, including Fn14, TNFR2, BAFFR, CD40, LTβR, and RANK (55). Most of these signals are regulatory elements of the immune response and support the hypothesis that the allelic variants of genes of the immune response can modify the clinical course in MD. Previous studies have suggested that variants in NFKB1 and TLR10 genes are modifiers of hearing outcome in patients with uni (26) or BMD (56), but the relationship between TLR10 and NF-κB-mediated inflammation in MD is not known.

The Site of NF-κB-Mediated Inflammation in MD Remains to be Defined: the Blood–Labyrinth Barrier (BLB), the Endolymphatic Sac, Fibrocytes of the Spiral Ligament, or/and the Tight Junctions (TJ) at the Reticular Lamina

This study provide evidences that the risk genotype could be used as predictor for bilateral SNHL in MD and our findings support an NF-κB-mediated inflammation in MD. In addition, this signal is a trans-eQTL and it regulates TWEAK/Fn14 pathway.

Although TWEAK could induce the abnormal activation of this pathway in MD, the site of inflammation is unknown. An interesting hypothesis to explore is an inflammatory damage of the BLB, given the role of TWEAK in maintaining the blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability and regulating the structure and function of the neurovascular unit (25) (Figure 6). Recent evidences suggest a role for TWEAK/Fn14 pathway in compromising the BBB in neuropsychiatric SLE (57). So, TWEAK/Fn14 interactions increase the accumulation of inflammatory cells in the choroid plexus, disorganizing BBB integrity and inducing neuronal death in vitro by the NF-κB signaling pathway (58, 59), but the role of TWEAK/Fn14 in the regulation of the BLB is unexplored.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Inflammation model in Meniere’s disease (MD). (A) TWEAK/Fn14 pathway activates non-canonical NF-κB signaling in lymphoid cells in MD. (B) Potential sites of inflammatory damage are the blood–brain barrier (BBB), the endolymphatic sac, the spiral ligament, and the reticular lamina in the neurosensory epithelium of the cochlea.

A second hypothesis is that inflammation may occur in the endolymphatic sac, since proteomic studies have found a high content of immunoglobulins in the sac (15). The sac is a small organ located in the posterior cranial fossa and has a crucial role, not only in the maintenance of endolymph composition but also in the innate immune response (60). We hypothesize that, after exposure to an environmental trigger, the carriers of the risk genotype could have an abnormal NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response at the endolymphatic sac, causing an ionic imbalance in the endolymph leading to the accumulation of endolymph at the cochlear duct.

A third hypothesis will involve the increase of NF-κB in fibrocytes within the spiral ligament and the spiral limbus after a stress stimuli and the release of proinflammatory cytokines. Genetic mutations involving spiral ligament cells may lead to SNHL (6163). Immune-mediated and acoustic trauma-mediated hearing impairment may result from the vulnerability of type I and type II fibrocytes to acoustic trauma and systemic inflammatory stress, respectively (64).

The last hypothesis affects cell adhesion molecules in the neurosensorial epithelium of the cochlea. The strict compartmentalization in the inner ear is necessary for normal hearing and is achieved by the TJs of the reticular lamina (65). An outstanding example for these interactions is established by the tight-junction proteins ZO-1, ZO-2, and ZO-3 that connect with the cytoplasmic domains of different integral membrane proteins such as occludins and claudins (66). TJP ZO-1 protein was shown to directly interact with F-actin, building a molecular bridge between integral membrane proteins like tricellulin (encoded by the TRIC gene) and the cytoskeleton, and human mutations in TRIC lead to deafness (67). Other members of the TJP have also been described to be involved in some types of deafness. Thus, a mutation in TJP2 was linked to progressive NSHL DNFA51 (68). So, carriers of the risk genotype may have an abnormal expression of cell adhesion molecules, which may compromise the permeability of the reticular lamina causing an ionic imbalance.

Conclusion

We present experimental data showing that the rs4947296 regulates gene expression in the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway in PBMCs and LCLs. This locus is a trans-eQTL and upregulates the translation of NF-κB in LCLs, supporting a regulatory effect in immune response.

Fn14 receptor and NF-κB are potential targets for drug therapy for carriers of the risk genotype in MD. Future preclinical studies and clinical trials using inhibitors of this pathway will be needed to demonstrate any potential benefit.

Patent

JL-E. Use of allelic variants in the locus 6p21.33 for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of Meniere’s disease. Patent P201531458, October 9, 2015.

Ethics Statement

The study was carried out in accordance with the recommendation of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975 (as revised in 2013). The study protocol PI13/1242 with reference number 01-2014 was approved by the Ethical Review Board in Almeria and all the ethics committees for clinical research of all the recruiting centers. All participants gave written informed consent.

Author Contributions

LF, TR, and AG-M performed experimental work including genotyping and gene expression arrays, cell culture, and confocal imaging studies. LF, TR, SO, AG-M, MM-B, AS, and JL-E performed statistical and bioinformatics analyses. IA, AB-C, JBDR, JE-S, JJFR, AG-A, RG-A, PM, EM-S, NP, PP, HP-G, SS-P, AS-V, MT, GT-R, and JL-E recruited patients and obtained informed consent in all individuals. MA-R and JL-E designed the study and data interpretation. JL-E supervised all experiments and LF and JL-E drafted the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of patients with Meniere’s disease for their participation in this study. The authors also want to specially thank to the staff of genomics and microscopy units at Genyo for the support and advice. This work was supported by Grants from Meniere’s Society, UK and PI13/1242 from ISCIII by FEDER Funds from the EU. LF was a graduate student at the Biomedicine program of the University of Granada and this work has been part of her doctoral thesis.

Footnotes

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at http://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01739/full#supplementary-material.

References

  • 1.Lopez-Escamez JA, Carey J, Chung WH, Goebel JA, Magnusson M, Mandala M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for Meniere’s disease. J Vestib Res (2015) 25(1):1–7. 10.3233/ves-150549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Espinosa-Sanchez JM, Lopez-Escamez JA. Meniere’s disease. Handb Clin Neurol (2016) 137:257–77. 10.1016/b978-0-444-63437-5.00019-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Merchant SN, Adams JC, Nadol JB., Jr Pathophysiology of Meniere’s syndrome: are symptoms caused by endolymphatic hydrops? Otol Neurotol (2005) 26(1):74–81. 10.1097/00129492-200501000-00013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ohmen JD, White CH, Li X, Wang J, Fisher LM, Zhang H, et al. Genetic evidence for an ethnic diversity in the susceptibility to Meniere’s disease. Otol Neurotol (2013) 34(7):1336–41. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182868818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Requena T, Espinosa-Sanchez JM, Cabrera S, Trinidad G, Soto-Varela A, Santos-Perez S, et al. Familial clustering and genetic heterogeneity in Meniere’s disease. Clin Genet (2014) 85(3):245–52. 10.1111/cge.12150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee JM, Kim MJ, Jung J, Kim HJ, Seo YJ, Kim SH. Genetic aspects and clinical characteristics of familial Meniere’s disease in a South Korean population. Laryngoscope (2015) 125(9):2175–80. 10.1002/lary.25207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xenellis J, Morrison AW, McClowskey D, Festenstein H. HLA antigens in the pathogenesis of Meniere’s disease. J Laryngol Otol (1986) 100(1):21–4. 10.1017/S0022215100098698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hietikko E, Kotimaki J, Okuloff A, Sorri M, Mannikko M. A replication study on proposed candidate genes in Meniere’s disease, and a review of the current status of genetic studies. Int J Audiol (2012) 51(11):841–5. 10.3109/14992027.2012.705900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Requena T, Cabrera S, Martin-Sierra C, Price SD, Lysakowski A, Lopez-Escamez JA. Identification of two novel mutations in FAM136A and DTNA genes in autosomal-dominant familial Meniere’s disease. Hum Mol Genet (2015) 24(4):1119–26. 10.1093/hmg/ddu524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martin-Sierra C, Requena T, Frejo L, Price SD, Gallego-Martinez A, Batuecas-Caletrio A, et al. A novel missense variant in PRKCB segregates low-frequency hearing loss in an autosomal dominant family with Meniere’s disease. Hum Mol Genet (2016) 25(16):3407–15. 10.1093/hmg/ddw183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martin-Sierra C, Gallego-Martinez A, Requena T, Frejo L, Batuecas-Caletrio A, Lopez-Escamez JA. Variable expressivity and genetic heterogeneity involving DPT and SEMA3D genes in autosomal dominant familial Meniere’s disease. Eur J Hum Genet (2017) 25(2):200–7. 10.1038/ejhg.2016.154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gazquez I, Soto-Varela A, Aran I, Santos S, Batuecas A, Trinidad G, et al. High prevalence of systemic autoimmune diseases in patients with Meniere’s disease. PLoS One (2011) 6(10):e26759. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tyrrell JS, Whinney DJ, Ukoumunne OC, Fleming LE, Osborne NJ. Prevalence, associated factors, and comorbid conditions for Meniere’s disease. Ear Hear (2014) 35(4):e162–9. 10.1097/aud.0000000000000041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chiarella G, Di Domenico M, Petrolo C, Saccomanno M, Rothenberger R, Giordano A, et al. A proteomics-driven assay defines specific plasma protein signatures in different stages of Meniere’s disease. J Cell Biochem (2014) 115(6):1097–100. 10.1002/jcb.24747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim SH, Kim JY, Lee HJ, Gi M, Kim BG, Choi JY. Autoimmunity as a candidate for the etiopathogenesis of Meniere’s disease: detection of autoimmune reactions and diagnostic biomarker candidate. PLoS One (2014) 9(10):e111039. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lopez-Escamez JA, Saenz-Lopez P, Gazquez I, Moreno A, Gonzalez-Oller C, Soto-Varela A, et al. Polymorphisms of CD16A and CD32 Fcgamma receptors and circulating immune complexes in Meniere’s disease: a case-control study. BMC Med Genet (2011) 12:2. 10.1186/1471-2350-12-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xu WD, Zhao Y, Liu Y. Role of the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway in autoimmune diseases. Immunol Res (2016) 64(1):44–50. 10.1007/s12026-015-8761-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Napetschnig J, Wu H. Molecular basis of NF-kappaB signaling. Annu Rev Biophys (2013) 42:443–68. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.House JW, Doherty JK, Fisher LM, Derebery MJ, Berliner KI. Meniere’s disease: prevalence of contralateral ear involvement. Otol Neurotol (2006) 27(3):355–61. 10.1097/00129492-200604000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McCabe BF. Autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (1979) 88(5 Pt 1):585–9. 10.1177/000348947908800501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ruckenstein MJ. Autoimmune inner ear disease. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2004) 12(5):426–30. 10.1097/01.moo.0000136101.95662.aa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pathak S, Goldofsky E, Vivas EX, Bonagura VR, Vambutas A. IL-1beta is overexpressed and aberrantly regulated in corticosteroid nonresponders with autoimmune inner ear disease. J Immunol (2011) 186(3):1870–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vambutas A, Lesser M, Mullooly V, Pathak S, Zahtz G, Rosen L, et al. Early efficacy trial of anakinra in corticosteroid-resistant autoimmune inner ear disease. J Clin Invest (2014) 124(9):4115–22. 10.1172/JCI76503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA (2013) 310(20):2191–4. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yepes M. TWEAK and Fn14 in the neurovascular unit. Front Immunol (2013) 4:367. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cabrera S, Sanchez E, Requena T, Martinez-Bueno M, Benitez J, Perez N, et al. Intronic variants in the NFKB1 gene may influence hearing forecast in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in Meniere’s disease. PLoS One (2014) 9(11):e112171. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Polychronakos C. Fine points in mapping autoimmunity. Nat Genet (2011) 43(12):1173–4. 10.1038/ng.1015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet (2007) 81(3):559–75. 10.1086/519795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nikolsky Y, Ekins S, Nikolskaya T, Bugrim A. A novel method for generation of signature networks as biomarkers from complex high throughput data. Toxicol Lett (2005) 158(1):20–9. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res (2003) 13(11):2498–504. 10.1101/gr.1239303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stephan D, Sbai O, Wen J, Couraud PO, Putterman C, Khrestchatisky M, et al. TWEAK/Fn14 pathway modulates properties of a human microvascular endothelial cell model of blood brain barrier. J Neuroinflammation (2013) 10:9. 10.1186/1742-2094-10-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods (2001) 25(4):402–8. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pena-Llopis S, Brugarolas J. Simultaneous isolation of high-quality DNA, RNA, miRNA and proteins from tissues for genomic applications. Nat Protoc (2013) 8(11):2240–55. 10.1038/nprot.2013.141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ayllon V, Bueno C, Ramos-Mejia V, Navarro-Montero O, Prieto C, Real PJ, et al. The Notch ligand DLL4 specifically marks human hematoendothelial progenitors and regulates their hematopoietic fate. Leukemia (2015) 29(8):1741–53. 10.1038/leu.2015.74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet (2009) 5(6):e1000529. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ward LD, Kellis M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res (2012) 40(Database issue):D930–4. 10.1093/nar/gkr917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xia K, Shabalin AA, Huang S, Madar V, Zhou YH, Wang W, et al. seeQTL: a searchable database for human eQTLs. Bioinformatics (2012) 28(3):451–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Boyle AP, Hong EL, Hariharan M, Cheng Y, Schaub MA, Kasowski M, et al. Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res (2012) 22(9):1790–7. 10.1101/gr.137323.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Frejo L, Soto-Varela A, Santos S, Aran I, Batuecas-Caletrio A, Perez-Guillen V, et al. Clinical subgroups in bilateral Meniere disease. Front Neurol (2016) 7:182. 10.3389/fneur.2016.00182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hou S, Yang Z, Du L, Jiang Z, Shu Q, Chen Y, et al. Identification of a susceptibility locus in STAT4 for Behcet’s disease in Han Chinese in a genome-wide association study. Arthritis Rheum (2012) 64(12):4104–13. 10.1002/art.37708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mizuki N, Meguro A, Ota M, Ohno S, Shiota T, Kawagoe T, et al. Genome-wide association studies identify IL23R-IL12RB2 and IL10 as Behcet’s disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet (2010) 42(8):703–6. 10.1038/ng.624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee YJ, Horie Y, Wallace GR, Choi YS, Park JA, Choi JY, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies GIMAP as a novel susceptibility locus for Behcet’s disease. Ann Rheum Dis (2013) 72(9):1510–6. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chu X, Pan CM, Zhao SX, Liang J, Gao GQ, Zhang XM, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies two new risk loci for Graves’ disease. Nat Genet (2011) 43(9):897–901. 10.1038/ng.898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu Y, Xu M, Min X, Wu K, Zhang T, Li K, et al. TWEAK/Fn14 activation participates in Ro52-mediated photosensitization in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol (2017) 8:651. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu Y, Peng L, Li L, Liu C, Hu X, Xiao S, et al. TWEAK/Fn14 activation contributes to the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid. J Invest Dermatol (2017) 137(7):1512–22. 10.1016/j.jid.2017.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Westra HJ, Franke L. From genome to function by studying eQTLs. Biochim Biophys Acta (2014) 1842(10):1896–902. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.04.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Heinig M, Petretto E, Wallace C, Bottolo L, Rotival M, Lu H, et al. A trans-acting locus regulates an anti-viral expression network and type 1 diabetes risk. Nature (2010) 467(7314):460–4. 10.1038/nature09386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fehrmann RS, Jansen RC, Veldink JH, Westra HJ, Arends D, Bonder MJ, et al. Trans-eQTLs reveal that independent genetic variants associated with a complex phenotype converge on intermediate genes, with a major role for the HLA. PLoS Genet (2011) 7(8):e1002197. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Winkles JA. The TWEAK-Fn14 cytokine-receptor axis: discovery, biology and therapeutic targeting. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2008) 7(5):411–25. 10.1038/nrd2488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Burkly LC. Regulation of tissue responses: the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway and other TNF/TNFR superfamily members that activate non-canonical NFkappaB signaling. Front Immunol (2015) 6:92. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baxter FO, Came PJ, Abell K, Kedjouar B, Huth M, Rajewsky K, et al. IKKbeta/2 induces TWEAK and apoptosis in mammary epithelial cells. Development (2006) 133(17):3485–94. 10.1242/dev.02502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Park JS, Kwok SK, Lim MA, Oh HJ, Kim EK, Jhun JY, et al. TWEAK promotes osteoclastogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Pathol (2013) 183(3):857–67. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.05.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Michaelson JS, Wisniacki N, Burkly LC, Putterman C. Role of TWEAK in lupus nephritis: a bench-to-bedside review. J Autoimmun (2012) 39(3):130–42. 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Serafini B, Magliozzi R, Rosicarelli B, Reynolds R, Zheng TS, Aloisi F. Expression of TWEAK and its receptor Fn14 in the multiple sclerosis brain: implications for inflammatory tissue injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol (2008) 67(12):1137–48. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31818dab90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sun SC. Non-canonical NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Cell Res (2011) 21(1):71–85. 10.1038/cr.2010.177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Requena T, Gazquez I, Moreno A, Batuecas A, Aran I, Soto-Varela A, et al. Allelic variants in TLR10 gene may influence bilateral affectation and clinical course of Meniere’s disease. Immunogenetics (2013) 65(5):345–55. 10.1007/s00251-013-0683-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stock AD, Wen J, Putterman C. Neuropsychiatric lupus, the blood brain barrier, and the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway. Front Immunol (2013) 4:484. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wen J, Doerner J, Weidenheim K, Xia Y, Stock A, Michaelson JS, et al. TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis promotes blood brain barrier disruption and increases neuronal cell death in MRL/lpr mice. J Autoimmun (2015) 60:40–50. 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Haile WB, Echeverry R, Wu F, Guzman J, An J, Wu J, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis and fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 mediate cerebral ischemia-induced poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 activation and neuronal death. Neuroscience (2010) 171(4):1256–64. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.10.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Moller MN, Kirkeby S, Vikesa J, Nielsen FC, Caye-Thomasen P. Gene expression demonstrates an immunological capacity of the human endolymphatic sac. Laryngoscope (2015) 125(8):E269–75. 10.1002/lary.25242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Minowa O, Ikeda K, Sugitani Y, Oshima T, Nakai S, Katori Y, et al. Altered cochlear fibrocytes in a mouse model of DFN3 nonsyndromic deafness. Science (1999) 285(5432):1408–11. 10.1126/science.285.5432.1408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Abe S, Katagiri T, Saito-Hisaminato A, Usami S, Inoue Y, Tsunoda T, et al. Identification of CRYM as a candidate responsible for nonsyndromic deafness, through cDNA microarray analysis of human cochlear and vestibular tissues. Am J Hum Genet (2003) 72(1):73–82. 10.1086/345398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Delprat B, Ruel J, Guitton MJ, Hamard G, Lenoir M, Pujol R, et al. Deafness and cochlear fibrocyte alterations in mice deficient for the inner ear protein otospiralin. Mol Cell Biol (2005) 25(2):847–53. 10.1128/MCB.25.2.847-853.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Adams JC, Seed B, Lu N, Landry A, Xavier RJ. Selective activation of nuclear factor kappa B in the cochlea by sensory and inflammatory stress. Neuroscience (2009) 160(2):530–9. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.02.073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kitajiri SI, Furuse M, Morita K, Saishin-Kiuchi Y, Kido H, Ito J, et al. Expression patterns of claudins, tight junction adhesion molecules, in the inner ear. Hear Res (2004) 187(1–2):25–34. 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00338-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dror AA, Avraham KB. Hearing impairment: a panoply of genes and functions. Neuron (2010) 68(2):293–308. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Riazuddin S, Ahmed ZM, Fanning AS, Lagziel A, Kitajiri S, Ramzan K, et al. Tricellulin is a tight-junction protein necessary for hearing. Am J Hum Genet (2006) 79(6):1040–51. 10.1086/510022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Walsh T, Pierce SB, Lenz DR, Brownstein Z, Dagan-Rosenfeld O, Shahin H, et al. Genomic duplication and overexpression of TJP2/ZO-2 leads to altered expression of apoptosis genes in progressive nonsyndromic hearing loss DFNA51. Am J Hum Genet (2010) 87(1):101–9. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES