Abstract
Liver fibrosis induced by Schistosoma japonicum (Sj) infection is characterized by the accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM). The activated and differentiated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are the predominant ECM-producing cell type in the liver. Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 pathway activation plays a key role in mice liver fibrosis models induced by alcohol, biliary ligation, and carbon tetrachloride 4. In this work, we found that TLR4 pathway activation correlated with the severity of liver fibrosis post Sj infection. The TLR4 receptor inhibitor TAK242 reduced the extent of liver fibrosis. The increased expression of TLR4, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and cytoglobin was observed in the HSCs of mouse liver after Sj infection. In response to stimulation with either lipopolysaccharide or Sj’s soluble egg antigen (SEA), high levels of TLR4 and α-SMA were induced in HSCs and were inhibited by TAK242 treatment. In previous work, we had reported that a high level of transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) is crucial for liver fibrosis post Sj infection. Herein, we found that TLR4 signaling also controlled Tgm2 expression. Inhibition of TGM2 activity by cystamine (CTM) in Sj-infected mice or in HSCs induced with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) stimulation led to a lowered activation of TLR4 signaling and a reduced α-SMA expression. These results were confirmed by downregulating the Tgm2 gene by specific siRNA. These observations implied the presence of a positive feedback regulation between TGM2 and TLR4 signaling in HSCs that correlated with liver fibrosis post Sj infection. This novel connection between TGM2 and TLR4 pathway activation in liver fibrosis induced by Sj infection enhances our understanding of liver diseases.
Keywords: toll-like receptor 4 signaling, transglutaminase 2, liver fibrosis, hepatic stellate cells, Schistosoma japonicum
Introduction
Schistosoma japonicum (Sj) infection has been reported in 12 provinces in China to date (1). Sj-infected hosts display serious pathological changes in the liver. Hepatic fibrosis develops as a response to chronic liver injury or infection and occurs almost exclusively in a pro-inflammatory environment. However, the role of inflammatory mediators in the fibrogenic responses of the liver remains poorly understood. The activation and proliferation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), which are characterized by the morphological transition to myofibroblast-like cells marked by a high level of α-SMA expression and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition [e.g., collagen type I (COL I) and III (COL III), encoded, respectively, by the col1a1 and col3a1 genes] have been well established as central events in the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis (2, 3). HSCs are the predominant ECM-producing cell type in the liver (4). Previous studies suggest that inhibiting the activation, proliferation, and migration of HSCs may be an attractive option for anti-fibrotic therapy (4). The inflammatory mechanisms that underlie the activation of HSCs and the liver fibrosis induced by Sj infection both warrant further study.
The toll-like receptors (TLRs) in liver tissues are expressed on Kupffer cells, endothelial cells, dendritic cells (DCs), biliary epithelial cells, HSCs, and hepatocytes. TLRs, especially TLR4 signal pathway, play critical roles in liver fibrosis (5–7). A deficiency in TLR4 expression attenuates alcoholic or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in mice (8–10), which is similar to liver fibrosis induced in mice by biliary ligation and exposure to carbon tetrachloride 4 (11). HSCs express all TLRs in the liver, including TLR4 (12, 13). TLR4 signaling can be activated in the HSCs of mice with liver fibrosis induced by biliary ligation (11). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the major ligand of TLR4. In response to LPS stimulation, some inflammatory cytokines and chemokines are upregulated in HSCs, including intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5), and chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 10 (CXCL10), most of which can directly activate HSCs (11, 14, 15). The glycolipids in Schistosoma mansoni (Sm) adult worm, the C-type lectin DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN), and TLR4 on DCs have crucial roles in DC activation, which can skew the T cell response toward a Th1 profile during the early stage of a Sm infection (16). However, no study has examined the relationship between the TLR4 signal pathway and Schisotosoma-induced fibrosis.
Transglutaminase 2 (TG2 or TGM2), also known as tissue transglutaminase, is a multifunctional enzyme involved in several important biological processes, including cell death, signaling, cytoskeleton rearrangements, ECM stabilization, and fibrosis (17, 18). We have provided evidence that TGM2 regulates the TGF-β1 of parasite origin and IL-13 of the host as well as documented the important role of TGM2 in liver fibrosis during Sj infection (19, 20). Tgm2 expression has been reported to be induced by LPS in macrophages, microglial cells, and astrocytes (21–23). The genetic knockout of Tgm2 confers resistance to LPS-induced septic shock in mice and has been associated with the capacity to restore the initial equilibrium of circulating cytokines and pro-inflammatory mediators (24). On the other hand, a marked downregulation of membrane TLR4 in DCs was observed in Tgm2-knockout mice (25). However, the relationship among TLR4 signaling, TGM2, and liver fibrosis in HSCs has never been reported in the literatures.
Based on above findings, the objectives of this study were to gain further insights into the mechanisms that lead to the dysregulation of HSCs activation in liver fibrosis post Sj infection. We specifically focused on the possible role of TLR4 signaling, TGM2, and their feedback regulation.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Sirius red staining kit was purchased from Abcam (USA). The antibodies used were as follows: anti-α-SMA (BS70000, Bioworld Technology, China), anti-TLR4 (Ab47093, Abcam, USA), anti-COL I (14695-I-AP, Abcam, USA) and anti-COL III (Ab7778, Abcam, USA), anti-TMG2 (3557, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), anti-cytoglobin (CYGB) (Ab52662, Abcam, USA), anti-desmin (DM0095, Boster, China), anti-cleaved-Caspase3 (9664, CST, USA), anti-p-IRAK1 (bs-3194R, Bioss, China), anti-β-Tubulin (DKM9003, Sanjian Biotechnology, China), and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies of mice or rabbit IgG (SA00001, Proteintech, Wuhan, China), Alexa Fluor-488- and Alexa Fluor-594-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (35552 and 35510, Invitrogen, USA). Lipopolysaccharide, a ligand of TLR4, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). TAK242, a small-molecule inhibitor of the TLR4 receptor that blocks binding to downstream adaptors in the signal pathway, was purchased from Shanghai Haoyuan Chemexpress. Cystamine (CTM), the inhibitor of TGM2 enzyme activity, was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit was purchased from the Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Jiangsu, China). 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate kit was purchased from Gene Tech Company Limited (Shanghai, China). Hoechst33342 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA), while the powder of the soluble egg antigen (SEA) of Sj was obtained from the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases in Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. PrimeScript® RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) and SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNase H Plus) were purchased from TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). Trizol was obtained from Life Technologies (USA), and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Recombinant human TGM2 protein [recombinant TGM2 (rTGM2), endotoxin level <1.0 EU per 1 µg] was purchased from R&D systems (USA). Lipofectamin RNAiMAX RNAi transfection reagent was purchased from Invitrogen (USA). The Tgm2 siRNAs targeting the 3-UTR of the Tgm2 mRNA were synthesized by Robibio Biotechnology Limited. The target sequences are as follows: Tgm2 siRNA-1, 5′-CCTTCTCATCGAGTACTTC-3′; Tgm2 siRNA-2, 5′-TCAATGCCGACGTGGTAGA-3′; Tgm2 siRNA-3, 5′-GCCTGATCCTTCTAGATGT-3′.
Mice, Ethics Statement, Infection of Parasites, and Treatments
Six- to eight-week-old female BABL/c mice (Experimental Animal Center of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China) were maintained according to the guidelines and were approved to be appropriate and humane by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Guangzhou Medical University. These mice were fed with commercially available diet and housed in a controlled environment at 23 ± 2°C. They were infected percutaneously through the abdomen with 20 ± 3 Sj cercariae of Chinese mainland strain. The mice developed liver granuloma and then acute, advanced, and chronic fibrosis at weeks 5, 6, 8, and 12 after they were infected (n = 8–10), respectively. The uninfected mice were used as normal controls (n = 7). Three days post-infection, the mice group with TGM2 inhibitor–CTM treatment (n = 8–10) were administered with 100 µl CTM (10−2 M) in PBS by intraperitoneal injection once a day for 7 days (26), while the infection control group (n = 7) only received PBS. Two non-infection control mice groups were treated with CTM (n = 7) and PBS (n = 7), respectively. Four weeks post-infection, the mice group with TLR4 pathway inhibitor–TAK242 treatment (n = 8–10) were administered with 100 µl TAK242 (0.3 mg/kg) in PBS by intraperitoneal injection twice a week for 4 weeks, while the infection control group (n = 7) only received PBS. Two non-infection control mice groups were treated with TAK242 (n = 7) and PBS (n = 7), respectively. All mice were sacrificed at week 8 and their liver tissues and sera were collected for further detection.
Measurement of the Severity of Liver Fibrosis in Mice via Sirius Red Staining
Fresh liver tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h and routinely embedded with paraffin. Liver sections of 5 µm were then prepared for Sirius red staining to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis. The area of morphometric collagen as shown in red was analyzed using the Image J software. Each stained sample was evaluated in a double-blind fashion by two independent researchers.
RNA Isolation and Quantitative PCR
The total RNA from fresh liver tissues and HSCs was extracted with a Trizol reagent, and cDNA was synthesized using PrimeScript® RT Master Mix according to the instructions of the manufacturer. cDNA was amplified by quantitative real-time PCR(qPCR) using the SYBR Green I PCR master kit and the CFX96™ real-time system (BIO-RAD, USA). Table 1 lists the primer sequences. The mRNA level of individual genes was normalized to GAPDH and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt data analysis method.
Table 1.
Proteins | Genes | Forward primer sequence | Reverse primer sequence |
---|---|---|---|
Mice | |||
GAPDH | Gapdh | TGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTGA | TTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCAGGAG |
α-SMA | Acta2 (actin, alpha 2, smooth muscle, aorta) | TTCGTGTGGCCCCTGAAGAGCAT | CCAGTTGTACGTCCAGAGGCA |
Col I | Col1a1 | CGTAAGCACTGGTGGACAGA | TCTGAGGAATGCCAGCTGCA |
Col III | Col3a1 | AGCACGTCTGGTTTGGAGAG | GACATTAGGCGCAGGAAGGT |
TLR4 | Tlr4 | ACCTGGCTGGTTTACACGTC | CTGCCATATACATTGCAGAA |
CD14 | Cd14 | ATTTGCATCCTCCTGGTTTC | AAATCAGGGGTCAAGTTTGC |
Pro-IL-1β | Il1b | TTGACGGACCCCAAAAGATG | TGGACAGCCCAGGTCAAAG |
TNF-α | Tnf | CAGGAGGGAGAACAGAAACTCCA | CCTGGTTGGCTGCTTGCTT |
CXCL10 | Cxcl10 | CTGCCGTCATTTTCTGCCTC | TTCAAGCTTCCCTATGGCCC |
CCL5 | Ccl5 | ATATGGCTCGGACACCACTC | TCTTCTCTGGGTTGGCACACA |
IFN-α | Ifna1 | TTTCCCCTGACCCAGGAAGATG | CTCTCAGTCTTCCCAGCACATT |
Transglutaminase 2 (TGM2) | Tgm2 | CTAGAGGCTTCTACTGGCTACC | GCGTAAGGACATATTCCCGTC |
Fibronectin 1 (FN1) | Fn1 | CTACGGAGAGACAGGAGGAAATAGC | AGTGACAGCATACAGGGTGATGG |
Humans | |||
GAPDH | GAPDH | GAACGGGAAGCTCACTGG | GCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCT |
Pro-IL-1β | IL1B | ATGATGGCTTATTACAGTGGCAA | GTCGGAGATTCGTAGCTGGA |
CXCL10 | Cxcl10 | GTGGCATTCAAGGAGTACCTC | TGATGGCCTTCGATTCTGGATT |
IL-6 | IL6 | TCCACAAGCGCCTTCGGTCCAGTTG | AGAGGTGAGTGGCTGTCTGTGTGGG |
Semi-Quantitative Immunohistochemical (IHC) Assay
After sacrificing the mice, their livers were quickly fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight before they were dehydrated with alcohol and embedded with paraffin. Liver sections of 5 µm were prepared. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nonspecific background was eliminated through a 10% bovine serum albumin treatment. The tissue sections were then incubated with specific primary antibodies, including anti-: α-SMA (1:400), COL I (1:400), COL III (1:400), p-IRAK1(1:400), or desmin (1:400), followed by HRP-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies. The images were observed and captured with an optical microscope (Olympus, Japan).
Five fields were randomly selected from each section of one sample at 400× magnification, and the semi-quantitative IHC assay was determined based on the modified H-score (27). The results of the IHC assay were scored in a semi-quantitative fashion by incorporating both the staining intensity level and the specific positive staining area (400×). Three staining intensity levels and five categories for the percentage of positive staining areas were scored as shown in Table 2. The score of each field from the same section was computed by multiplying a weighted staining intensity level by the percentage of positive staining area. The final score (H-score) of each tissue section was equal to the average score of five fields ranging from 0 to 12.
Table 2.
Staining intensity level | Score | Percentage of positive staining area (%) |
---|---|---|
– | 0 | 0–5 |
Canary yellow | 1 | 6–25 |
Pale brown | 2 | 26–50 |
Tan | 3 | 51–75 |
– | 4 | 76–100 |
The protein expression level in IHC was standardized based on H-score as follows: 0: negative expression or (+); 1–4: weak expression or (++); 5–8: moderate expression or (+++); and 9–12: strong expression or (++++). The semi-quantitative level of target protein expression in each group was determined based on the average H-score among the sections of different samples.
Semi-Quantification of the Single or Double-Positive Cells for α-SMA and TLR4 Immunofluorescence (IF)
The liver sections of Sj-infected mice with or without TAK242 or CTM treatment were incubated with primary antibodies against α-SMA or CYGB and TLR4 at 4°C overnight. Afterward, these sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor-488- and Alexa Fluor-594-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies (1:4,000) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33343 (1:4,000) for 30 min. The slides were then mounted with an antifading medium. Immunofluorescent images were observed and captured using a Zeiss LSM Pascal Axiovert confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss). The number of single TLR4 or α-SMA or CYGB positive cells as well as α-SMA or CYGB and TLR4 double-positive cells in each field at 400× magnification was calculated using Image J. Five images were randomly selected from each sample, and the staining intensity of the selected images was quantified with a preselected threshold using Image J.
In Vitro Cultured Human HSCs Line
A human HSCs line (LX-2) was obtained from the Shanghai Cell Institute (Shanghai, China) and was maintained in a DMEM culture medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 mmol/L glutamate, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin.
Western Blotting
The proteins from mouse livers and the cultured HSCs line were extracted in radio-immunoprecipitation assay buffer. Equal amounts of cell proteins were resolved in 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to PVDF membranes. After incubating with the primary and secondary antibodies, the target proteins were visualized using an enhanced ECL reagent according to the instructions of the supplier.
RNA Interference
Hepatic stellate cells were seeded in a six-well plate the day before transfection at 30–50% confluency. Tgm2 siRNA was transfected with Lipofectamin RNAiMAX RNAi transfection reagent. 48 h after transfection, TGM2 protein levels were measured by Western blotting.
Statistical Analysis
The results are presented as the mean or SEM (±SD) of the indicated number of replicates/experiments. We performed one-way analysis of variance to calculate the statistical differences among multiple groups, and then performed paired comparisons through t-test. An adjusted P-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Activation of the TLR4 Signal Pathway Correlates with the Extent of Liver Fibrosis Post Sj Infection
The extent of liver granuloma and fibrosis was evaluated by monitoring the liver aspect, collagen deposition (Sirius red staining) (Figure 1A), and HSCs activation [high RNA and protein expression levels of Acta2 (which encodes α-SMA), Col1a1, and Col3a1] (Figures 1B,C). The week-8 Sj infection group displayed the largest collagen deposition area (29.66 ± 1.07%), followed by the week 6 (21.69 ± 1.24%), week 12 (11.98 ± 0.95%), and week 5 (1.76 ± 0.34%) groups (Figure 1A, right). The levels of Acta2, Col1a1, and Col3a1 transcription and translation in the liver increased after Sj infection at weeks 5, 6, 8, and 12, and peaked at week 8 (Figure 1B). The expression of α-SMA, COL I, and COL III was moderate at week 8 after Sj infection (Figure 1C, right). Consistent with the results of our previous study (19, 20), liver granuloma induced by Sj infection began at week 5, acute fibrosis began at week 6, and advanced liver fibrosis began at week 8. The areas of collagen deposition and the expressions of α-SMA, COL I, and COL III all decreased at week 12 (chronic liver fibrosis).
To examine the correlation between TLR4 signaling and liver fibrogenesis, qPCR was used to screen the transcriptional profiles of hepatic Tlr4 and Cd14, which encode, respectively, transmembrane and membrane associated receptors, Tnf and Il1b that code for effector cytokines of MyD88-dependent TLR4 pathway activation, and Cxcl10 and Ccl5 chemokine genes, which are used as readouts of MyD88-independent TLR4 pathway activation. The mRNA levels of Tnf and Il1b significantly increased after Sj infection at week 6 during acute liver fibrosis and subsequently remained high at the advanced liver fibrosis stage (week 8). The level of Cxcl10 and Ccl5 strongly increased at weeks 5 and 6 when the Sj eggs began to induce granuloma and acute liver damage, and no differences were observed between week 8 and the non-infected control (Figure 1D). These data are compatible with the hypothesis that TLR4 pathway activation triggers the host inflammatory response during Sj infection.
Inhibition of TLR4 Signaling Alleviates Hepatic Fibrosis Induced by Sj Infection
To assess whether the TLR4 signal pathway is involved in the formation of liver fibrosis induced by Sj infection, we started to inject the TLR4 signal pathway inhibitor TAK242 (28) to Sj-infected mice at week 4 of infection. The whole treatment lasted for 4 weeks. TAK242 treatment lowered the mRNA levels of Tlr4, Il1b, and ifna1, Ccl5 (Figure 2A). In addition, the TAK242-treated mice exhibited a significant reduction in their collagen deposition area percentage after Sj infection (Figure 2B). The mRNA and protein expression levels of Acta2, Col1a1, and Col3a1 (Figures 2C,D) of these mice were lower than those of TAK242-untreated mice. The expression of α-SMA changed from moderate to low level according to H-score evaluation in the IHC assay (Figure 2D). TAK242-treated mice showed a significant decrease in parasite egg number after Sj infection compared to the non-treated mice (P ≤ 0.05, Figure S1 in Supplementary Material). These findings suggest that inhibiting TLR4 signaling alleviated the egg load and extent of liver fibrosis, thereby highlighting TLR4 pathway activation as an important pathogenic mechanism that induces liver fibrogenesis post Sj infection.
TLR4 and α-SMA Expression Is Induced in Sj-Infected Liver HSCs, and LPS, and Sj SEA Triggered the Activation of In Vitro Cultured HSCs
Hepatic stellate cells activation plays a crucial role in the progression of hepatic fibrosis (2, 3). TLR4 signaling in HSCs, but not in Kupffer cells, is crucial for the development of liver fibrosis induced by alcohol, CCL4, and viral infection (11, 13). In humans, CYGB has been reported to be a relevant marker for distinguishing stellate cells from portal myofibroblasts in the damaged liver, while α-SMA marks activated HSCs and myofibroblasts (29). However, in mice, α-SMA and desmin are used as markers for activated and total HSCs, respectively (30). We explored whether the TLR4 signal pathway is activated in HSCs during Sj infection. In the week 8 Sj-infected liver but not in the non-infected control, TLR4 (red fluorescence) was highly expressed in the cells surrounding the vessels where Sj adult worms located. TLR4 was especially expressed in the granuloma where Sj eggs are deposited, while α-SMA (green) (Figure 3A) or CYGB (green) (Figure S2 in Supplementary Material, left) was highly expressed in HSCs or appeared as fiber-like materials surrounding the eggs. Consistent with the results of qPCR and IHC (Figure 2), TAK242 decreased the levels of TLR4, α-SMA (Figure 3B, top), and CYGB (Figure S2 in Supplementary Material, right top) in the liver 8 weeks after Sj infection. As expected, TLR4 and α-SMA or TLR4 and CYGB doubly positive cells were found, and TAK242 treatment did decrease the number of these doubly positive cells (Figure 3B, bottom; Figure S2 in Supplementary Material, right bottom). The numbers of TLR4 and α-SMA doubly positive cells (yellow, merged color by red, and green) in each field (200×) with or without TAK242 treatment were 63.3 ± 6.2 and 18.2 ± 5.7, respectively (Figure 3B, bottom), while the numbers of TLR4 and CYGB doubly positive cells in each field (200×) were 256.0 ± 34.1 and 33.0 ± 7.3, respectively (Figure S2 in Supplementary Material, right bottom). The liver sections of TAK242-treated mice also showed reduced levels of desmin expression after Sj infection compared to the non-treated control according to the IHC assay (Figure S3 in Supplementary Material). These results suggest that the activated TLR4 signal pathway in HSCs may contribute to the activation of HSCs and fibrogenesis induced by Sj infection. When we stimulated the in vitro cultured HSC line with LPS to activate TLR4 signaling, we found that the protein level of α-SMA was upregulated in a LPS-dose-dependent way (Figure 3C; Figure S4A in Supplementary Material). The SEA of Sj also triggered TLR4 and α-SMA expression in the in vitro cultured HSCs in a dose-dependent way (Figure 3D; Figure S4B in Supplementary Material). Altogether, these results suggest that the TLR4 signal pathway in HSCs contributes to the activation of HSCs during Sj infection.
TLR4 Signaling Regulates the Expression of TGM2
Our previous work indicated that TGM2 contributes to liver fibrosis post Sj infection (19, 20). Thus, both TGM2 and activation of the TLR4 signal pathway correlated with the development of liver fibrosis during Sj infection. As an inflammatory factor, TGM2 might be under the control of TLR4 signaling and involved in the activation of HSCs. The mRNA and protein expression levels of Tgm2 in the 8-week Sj-infected mouse liver with TAK242 treatment were significantly reduced compared to those of the non-treated control (Figures 4A,B; Figure S5A in Supplementary Material). In the HSC line, the TGM2 and α-SMA levels both increased after LPS stimulation and were reduced by TAK242 treatment in a dose-dependent way (Figures 4C; Figure S5B in Supplementary Material), thereby indicating that Tgm2 expression is regulated by the TLR4 signal pathway.
TGM2 Is Involved in Liver Fibrosis during Sj Infection As an Upstream Factor That Activates TLR4 Signaling in HSCs
Positive feedback regulations often occur in immune response and immune-related diseases. We examined whether TGM2 might not only act downstream of TLR4 signaling but also act as an upstream activator of the TLR4 signal pathway in our infection model.
In our previous work, we found that treating mice with CTM, a TGM2 inhibitor, decreased the levels of TGM2 and liver fibrosis in the 8-week Sj-infected mouse liver (19). We observed that the mRNA expression levels of Tlr4, Il1b, and Ccl5 (Figure 5A) as well as the TLR4 protein expression levels were downregulated in CTM-treated mice with respect to the non-treated control (Figure 5B; Figure S11A in Supplementary Material). IHC assay results showed that the level of p-IRAK1, an important cytoplasmic factor of the TLR4-MyD88-dependent pathway, decreased upon CTM treatment (Figure 5C), as p-IRAK1 positive cells were rarely found in the CTM-treated mouse liver sections (Figure 5C). TGM2 can interact with fibronectin (FN) with high affinity (31), and FN extra domain A was identified as an agonist of TLR4 (32). We found that the RNA expression level of Fn1 during Sj infection was accordingly increased at weeks 5 and 6, which correlated with the level of expression of Tgm2 and TLR4 pathway effector genes (Figure S6 in Supplementary Material).
We investigated further whether TGM2–TLR4 signaling regulation also operates in HSCs in Sj-infected mouse liver. We detected TLR4, α-SMA, and CYGB in the 8-week Sj infection mice livers with or without CTM treatment using IF assay. CTM treatment dramatically decreased the levels of TLR4, α-SMA (Figure 5D, right top), and CYGB (Figure S7 in Supplementary Material, top right). Moreover, the treatment significantly decreased the number of TLR4 and α-SMA doubly positive cells (Figure 5D, left) and also TLR4 and CYGB doubly positive cells (Figure S5 in Supplementary Material left). The number of TLR4, α-SMA doubly positive cells changed from 79.3 ± 6.7 in every 200× field in the CTM treatment group to 48.4 ± 6.6 in the non-treatment group (Figure 5D, bottom right), whereas that of TLR4, CYGB doubly positive cells changed from 256.0 ± 34.1 to 66.4 ± 16.3 (Figure S5 in Supplementary Material, bottom right). The IHC assay results showed that the expression level of desmin significantly decreased in the liver sections of the CTM-treated mice after Sj infection in comparison with the non-treatment group (Figure S8 in Supplementary Material). Western blotting analysis showed that CTM treatment significantly decreased cleaved caspase 3 (c-casp3) levels in the infected mice livers (Figure S9 in Supplementary Material). Furthermore, CTM-treated mice after Sj infection displayed no significant change in egg numbers when compared with the non-treated control group (Figure S10 in Supplementary Material). These results thereby exclude the possibility that CTM treatment triggers caspase 3 cleavage in the host liver and thus triggers apoptosis of HSCs and also rule out that CTM directly acts upon the pathogen during Sj infection.
We, further, verified the effect of TGM2 regulation on TLR4 signaling in the cultured HSC line. As Tgm2 gene promoter contained a retinoic acid response element (1.7 kb upstream of the initiation site), all trans-retinoic acid (ARTA) was used to trigger TGM2 expression (33). In cultured HSCs, ATRA at 2.5–15 µM (Figure 5E, left and Figure S11B in Supplementary Material) and rTGM2 (Figure 5E, right and Figure S11C in Supplementary Material) treatment effectively upregulated TLR4 and α-SMA expression, whereas ATRA treatment at 20 µM downregulated TGM2 and TLR4 (Figure 5E, left and Figure S11B in Supplementary Material). The upregulation of TLR4, TGM2, and α-SMA in response to 10 µM ATRA could be reduced by CTM treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5F, left and Figure S11D in Supplementary Material). Moreover, treatment with validated specific siRNAs of Tgm2 (Figure 5F, bottom right and Figure S11E in Supplementary Material) confirmed this result (Figure 5F, top right and Figure S11F in Supplementary Material). Meanwhile, the RNA expression levels of the IL1B, IL6, and Cxcl10, readouts of TLR4 pathway activation were significantly upregulated with 10 µM ATRA and 20 ng/ml human rTGM2. Almost all of these levels could be lowered by CTM treatment, except for Cxcl10 under ATRA stimulation (Figure 5G).
Collectively, these results establish a novel positive feedback regulation in which Sj infection activated TLR4 signal pathway increases the expression of TGM2, which in turn contributes to HSCs activation through TLR4 pathway and then causes liver fibrosis. Moreover, upregulated TGM2 positively enhances TLR4 signaling by triggering TLR4 ligation or possibly through IRAK1 phosphorylation (Figure 6).
Discussion
Despite major efforts on this research topic, the mechanisms of liver fibrosis post Sj infection remain unclear to date. TLR signaling contributes to the development of chronic liver diseases via complex immunopathogenesis (34). TLR4 activation in HSCs is a key step in collagen production and a major mechanism for the development of fibrosis and cirrhosis (11, 14, 35, 36). Activated HSCs can express TLR4 and CD14 and respond to LPS via the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6 and IL-8) and several chemokines or adhesion molecules (such as monocyte chemotactic protein 1, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, CCL5, and CXCL10) (14, 15, 37, 38). In chimeric C3H/HeJ mice with TLR4 mutation in HSCs, remission of hepatic fibrosis induced by exposure to LPS indicated a main role for HSCs in hepatic inflammation and fibrosis (11, 39). In this work, we show that the transcription of Tlr4 and Cd14 is upregulated in the liver of Sj-infected mice, and that suppression of TLR4 signaling by TAK242 decreases the extent of hepatic fibrosis induced by Sj infection. We also observed the consistent correlation of the expressions of TLR4, α-SMA, CYGB, and desmin in the HSCs of Sj-infected liver with or without TAK242 treatment through the IF or IHC method. Importantly, under SEA of Sj or LPS stimulation, TLR4 and α-SMA levels in cultured HSCs were upregulated in a dose-dependent manner. As α-SMA is a marker of activated HSCs in mice (30), these results indicate that Sj-activated TLR4 signaling induces HSCs activation and then liver fibrogenesis. Compared with wild-type mice, Tlr4 (−/−) mice showed a higher survival ratio and a higher extent of liver fibrosis, but the difference was not significant (data not shown). Zhang et al. (40) have reported that Tlr4(−/−) mice display reduced levels of IL-12, IFN-γ, and IL-4 in dermal tissues and retroauricular draining lymph nodes 4 days after Sj infection as well as increased egg burden and decreased T cell activation at week 6. Durães et al. (41) concluded that TLR4 is a key receptor involved in Sm tegument induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These results indicate that TLR4 signaling is needed for the host’s protective response at an early stage of Schistosoma infection. This early protective function of TLR4 renders the use of Tlr4 (−/−) mice unsuitable for the study of liver fibrosis at the late stage of Sj infection. As a first step, we therefore used the TLR4 pathway inhibitor TAK242 at week 4, when Sj enters the liver for 4 weeks. Of note, as we cannot formally exclude a possible direct action of the TAK242 inhibitor on Sj, the results obtained with this inhibitor will need to be confirmed in future work either using a conditional knockout of TLR4 in HSCs, or using the chimeric C3H/HeJ HSCs mouse model (11, 39).
Transglutaminase 2, a multifunctional enzyme, is reportedly involved in liver fibrosis (18, 19). We also provided evidence that TGM2 regulates TGF-β1 of Sj origin and IL-13 of the host and documented the important involvement of TGM2 in liver fibrosis during Sj infection in previous studies (19, 20). TGM2 and TLR4 levels display a similar pattern of expression changes that correlates with the extent of liver fibrosis post Sj infection. Seki et al. (11) reported that TLR4-enhanced TGF-β1 signaling and HSCs activation promote hepatic fibrosis, which prompted us to explore the relationship between TGM2 and TLR4 signaling in liver fibrosis post Sj infection. Brown (42) reviewed that NF-κB pathway activation upregulates TGM2 level in the breast cancer, and Kiziltas (34) reported that NF-κB pathway activation is the common downstream pathway of TLR4 signal pathway activation in the liver. Based on these data, we hypothesized that TLR4 signaling might act upstream of TGM2 during Sj infection. As expected, the RNA and protein expression levels of Tgm2 significantly decrease in the liver of 8-week Sj-infected mice treated with the TLR4 inhibitor TAK242, and the expression levels of TGM2 and α-SMA increase in vitro in cultured HSCs under LPS stimulation. Moreover, the increased levels are dose-dependently lowered by TAK242 treatment. These results suggest that Tgm2 is a downstream target of TLR4 signaling during Sj infection. The mechanisms by which TLR4 regulates Tgm2 expression will need to be clarified in future experiments.
Positive feedback regulation usually occurs in immune-related diseases. In the present research, we found that TGM2 expression is not only regulated through the TLR4 pathway but also its protein product acts upstream to activate this pathway. The TGM2 inhibitor CTM decreased the level of expression of TLR4, of the TLR4 pathway-dependent effector cytokines, and levels of p-IRAK1, a cytoplasmic adaptor of the TLR4-MyD88-dependent pathway in Sj-infected mice liver. However, we found that p-IRF3 levels were also upregulated in HSCs, suggesting an involvement of the TLR4/MyD88-independent pathway (data not shown). Petrasek et al. (43) reported that high levels of p-IRF3 in parenchymal cells of the liver exert protective effect against liver injury in alcoholic mice. In-depth studies will be performed to assess the effect of CTM treatment or Tgm2 downregulation on p-IRAK-1 and p-IRF3 expression. IF results establish that the TGM2-TLR4 pathway is regulated in the HSCs of Sj-infected mouse liver. Furthermore, we have confirmed that this regulation also takes place in in vitro cultured HSCs. Treatment with ATRA (a trigger of TGM2 expression), and rTGM2 effectively upregulated TGM2, TLR4, and α-SMA, and the upregulation was alleviated by CTM or specific siRNA of TGM2. The transcription levels of IL1B, IL6, and Cxcl10 were also upregulated by the ATRA treatment. Taken together, our results indicate that a novel self-reinforcing molecular feedback loop takes place between TGM2 and the TLR4 pathway in HSCs. Given that TLR4 expression in mice liver without treatment is very low or absent (34), this feedback loop should not exist in normal mice.
Using Myd88-deficient mice, Seki et al. (11) concluded that the TLR4-MyD88–NF-κB axis is linked to hepatic fibrosis induced by elevated LPS levels. However, TLR4-MyD88-independent activation by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) is central to the inflammatory process in ischemia–reperfusion lesions (44, 45). In our infection model, the following indirect evidence suggests that TLR4 signaling is possibly MyD88-dependent: there is a significant increase of the expression levels of the TLR4/MyD88-dependent effector cytokine genes, Tnf, and Il1ß at week 6 when liver fibrosis is acute and then at week 8 when liver fibrosis is advanced after Sj infection. However, the levels of CXCL10 and CCL5, readout cytokines of the MyD88-independent TLR4 pathway increased at week 5 when Sj eggs induce granuloma and then at week 6 when Sj eggs induce acute liver damage. Only the RNA levels of IL1B or IL6 but not those of Cxcl10 were decreased in HSCs after CTM and ATRA treatment.
Cystamine treatment of mice during the early stage of Sj infection (from day 3 to 10) alleviates the extent of liver fibrosis but the treatment during the late stage (from week 5 to 6 or from week 6 to 8) did not have this effect (19). The early inhibition role might persist in some cells because TGM2 might affect CD8+ memory T-cell generation as reported by Kim et al. (46). However, the exact mechanism needs to be elucidated. Tgm2(−/−) mice were not used in this study to verify the results because of the inconsistent effect of CTM treatment in the early and late stages of liver fibrosis.
In general, the positive feedback regulation between TGM2 and TLR4 signaling in HSCs correlated with liver fibrosis post Sj infection. It is, however, unclear at this stage as to which stimulus actually triggers the TLR4 pathway during Sj infection. Results showed that the level of FN was correlated with the level of TGM2, TLR4, and the extent of liver fibrosis during Sj infection. SEA of Sj and rTGM2 induce TLR4 and α-SMA expression in cultured HSCs in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, potential TLR4 ligands during Sj infection include pathogen associated molecular patterns such as the components of SEA from the parasite, possibly some danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), e.g., FN and/or TGM2 from the host. The novel self-reinforcing molecular feedback loop between the TLR4 pathway and TGM2 may represent a potential new target in Sj infection-induced liver fibrosis and even other related liver diseases. Future studies will reveal whether the TGM2/TLR4 pathway axis is relevant in other inflammatory diseases.
Ethics Statement
Six- to eight-week-old female BABL/c mice (Experimental Animal Center of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China) were maintained according to the guidelines and were approved to be appropriate and humane by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Guangzhou Medical University.
Author Contributions
ZW, XJ, JT, and GL contributed equally to this work. ZW, and XJ performed the research; ZL, ZW, XJ, JT, and DF designed the research; JT, ZW, XJ, GL, LX, MW, and CL contributed essential reagents or tools; ZW analyzed the data; ZW, ZL, and JT wrote the paper; ZL and JT revised the paper.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Professor Jongdae Lee, Samuel Liegeois, and Jianming Chen for constructive comments and suggestions at several stages of this work.
Footnotes
Funding. This work was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (no. 2015A030313469) and Immunology as one of the Key Disciplines of Guangdong high level University.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at http://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01808/full#supplementary-material.
References
- 1.Colley DG, Bustinduy AL, Secor WE, King CH. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet (2014) 383(9936):2253–64. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61949-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Friedman SL. Evolving challenges in hepatic fibrosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2010) 7(8):425–36. 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology (2008) 134(6):1655–69. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kisseleva T, Brenner DA. Role of hepatic stellate cells in fibrogenesis and the reversal of fibrosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2007) 22(Suppl 1):S73–8. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04658.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seki E, Schnabl B. Role of innate immunity and the microbiota in liver fibrosis: crosstalk between the liver and gut. J Physiol (2012) 590(3):447–58. 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.219691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nakamoto N, Kanai T. Role of toll-like receptors in immune activation and tolerance in the liver. Front Immunol (2014) 5:221. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Petrasek J, Csak T, Szabo G. Toll-like receptors in liver disease. Adv Clin Chem (2013) 59:155–201. 10.1016/B978-0-12-405211-6.00006-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hritz I, Mandrekar P, Velayudham A, Catalano D, Dolganiuc A, Kodys K, et al. The critical role of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 in alcoholic liver disease is independent of the common TLR adapter MyD88. Hepatology (2008) 48(4):1224–31. 10.1002/hep.22470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rivera CA, Adegboyega P, van Rooijen N, Tagalicud A, Allman M, Wallace M. Toll-like receptor-4 signaling and Kupffer cells play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol (2007) 47:571–9. 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.04.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Csak T, Velayudham A, Hritz I, Petrasek J, Levin I, Lippai D, et al. Deficiency in myeloid differentiation factor-2 and toll-like receptor 4 expression attenuates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2011) 300(3):G433–41. 10.1152/ajpgi.00163.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Seki E, De Minicis S, Osterreicher CH, Kluwe J, Osawa Y, Brenner DA, et al. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat Med (2007) 13(11):1324–32. 10.1038/nm1663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang B, Trippler M, Pei R, Lu M, Broering R, Gerken G, et al. Toll-like receptor activated human and murine hepatic stellate cells are potent regulators of hepatitis C virus replication. J Hepatol (2009) 51(6):1037–45. 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aoyama T, Paik YH, Seki E. Toll-like receptor signaling and liver fibrosis. Gastroenterol Res Pract (2010) 2010:192543. 10.1155/2010/192543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Paik YH, Schwabe RF, Bataller R, Russo MP, Jobin C, Brenner DA. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates inflammatory signaling by bacterial lipopolysaccharide in human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology (2003) 37(5):1043–55. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang L, Seki E. Toll-like receptors in liver fibrosis: cellular crosstalk and mechanisms. Front Physiol (2012) 3:138. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.van Stijn CM, Meyer S, van den Broek M, Bruijns SC, van Kooyk Y, Geyer R, et al. Schistosoma mansoni worm glycolipids induce an inflammatory phenotype in human dendritic cells by cooperation of TLR4 and DC-SIGN. Mol Immunol (2010) 47(7–8):1544–52. 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nurminskaya MV, Belkin AM. Cellular functions of tissue transglutaminase. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol (2012) 294:1–97. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394305-7.00001-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tatsukawa H, Furutani Y, Hitomi K, Kojima S. Transglutaminase 2 has opposing roles in the regulation of cellular functions as well as cell growth and death. Cell Death Dis (2016) 7(6):e2244. 10.1038/cddis.2016.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tang J, Zhu X, Zhao J, Fung M, Li Y, Gao Z, et al. Tissue transglutaminase-regulated transformed growth factor-β1 in the parasite links Schistosoma japonicum infection with liver fibrosis. Mediators Inflamm (2015) 2015:659378. 10.1155/2015/659378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tang J, Huang H, Ji X, Zhu X, Li Y, She M, et al. Involvement of IL-13 and tissue transglutaminase in liver granuloma and fibrosis after Schistosoma japonicum infection. Mediators Inflamm (2014) 2014:753483. 10.1155/2014/753483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kawabe K, Takano K, Moriyama M, Nakamura Y. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated transglutaminase 2 expression enhances endocytosis activity in the mouse microglial cell line BV-2. Neuroimmunomodulation (2015) 22(4):243–9. 10.1159/000365484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sarang Z, Köröskényi K, Pallai A, Duró E, Melino G, Griffin M, et al. Transglutaminase 2 null macrophages respond to lipopolysaccharide stimulation by elevated proinflammatory cytokine production due to an enhanced αvβ3 integrin-induced Src tyrosine kinase signaling. Immunol Lett (2011) 138(1):71–8. 10.1016/j.imlet.2011.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Takano K, Shiraiwa K, Moriyama M, Nakamura Y. Transglutaminase 2 expression induced by lipopolysaccharide stimulation together with NO synthase induction in cultured astrocytes. Neurochem Int (2010) 57(7):812–8. 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Falasca L, Farrace MG, Rinaldi A, Tuosto L, Melino G, Piacentini M. Transglutaminase type II is involved in the pathogenesis of endotoxic shock. J Immunol (2008) 180:2616–24. 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Matic I, Sacchi A, Rinaldi A, Melino G, Khosla C, Falasca L, et al. Characterization of transglutaminase type II role in dendritic cell differentiation and function. J Leukoc Biol (2010) 88(1):181–8. 10.1189/jlb.1009691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Luciani A, Villella VR, Esposito S, Gavina M, Russo I, Silano M, et al. Targeting autophagy as a novel strategy for facilitating the therapeutic action of potentiators on ΔF508 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. Autophagy (2012) 8(11):1657–72. 10.4161/auto.21483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Budwit-Novotny DA, McCarty KS, Cox EB, Soper JT, Mutch DG, Creasman WT, et al. Immunohistochemical analyses of estrogen receptor in endometrial adenocarcinoma using amonoclonal antibody. Cancer Res (1986) 46(10):5419–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Matsunaga N, Tsuchimori N, Matsumoto T, Ii M. TAK-242 (resatorvid), a small-molecule inhibitor of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 signaling, binds selectively to TLR4 and interferes with interactions between TLR4 and its adaptor molecules. Mol Pharmacol (2011) 79(1):34–41. 10.1124/mol.110.068064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Motoyama H, Komiya T, Thuy le TT, Tamori A, Enomoto M, Morikawa H, et al. Cytoglobin is expressed in hepatic stellate cells, but not in myofibroblasts, in normal and fibrotic human liver. Lab Invest (2014) 94(2):192–207. 10.1038/labinvest.2013.135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Troeger JS, Mederacke I, Gwak GY, Dapito DH, Mu X, Hsu CC, et al. Deactivation of hepatic stellate cells during liver fibrosis resolution in mice. Gastroenterology (2012) 143(4):1073–83.e22. 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cardoso I, Østerlund EC, Stamnaes J, Iversen R, Andersen JT, Jørgensen TJ, et al. Dissecting the interaction between transglutaminase 2 and fibronectin. Amino Acids (2017) 49(3):489–500. 10.1007/s00726-016-2296-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Julier Z, Martino MM, de Titta A, Jeanbart L, Hubbell JA. The TLR4 agonist fibronectin extra domain A is cryptic, exposed by elastase-2; use in a fibrin matrix cancer vaccine. Sci Rep (2015) 5:8569. 10.1038/srep08569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nagy L, Thomázy VA, Saydak MM, Stein JP, Davies PJ. The promoter of the mouse tissue transglutaminase gene directs tissue-specific, retinoid-regulated and apoptosis-linked expression. Cell Death Differ (1997) 4(7):534–47. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kiziltas S. Toll-like receptors in pathophysiology of liver diseases. World J Hepatol (2016) 8(32):1354–69. 10.4254/wjh.v8.i32.1354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mencin A, Kluwe J, Schwabe RF. Toll-like receptors as targets in chronic liver diseases. Gut (2009) 58(5):704–20. 10.1136/gut.2008.156307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bataller R, Brenner DA. Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest (2005) 115(2):209–18. 10.1172/JCI24282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kesar V, Odin JA. Toll-like receptors and liver disease. Liver Int (2014) 34(2):184–96. 10.1111/liv.12315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen Y, Sun R. Toll-like receptors in acute liver injury and regeneration. Int Immunopharmacol (2011) 11(10):1433–41. 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.04.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guo J, Friedman SL. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling in liver injury and hepatic fibrogenesis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair (2010) 21(3):21. 10.1186/1755-1536-3-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang M, Gao Y, Du X, Zhang D, Ji M, Wu G. Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4 deficiencies exert differential in vivo effects against Schistosoma japonicum. Parasite Immunol (2011) 33(4):199–209. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2010.01265.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Durães FV, Carvalho NB, Melo TT, Oliveira SC, Fonseca CT. IL-12 and TNF-alpha production by dendritic cells stimulated with Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula tegument is TLR4- and MyD88-dependent. Immunol Lett (2009) 125(1):72–7. 10.1016/j.imlet.2009.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brown KD. Transglutaminase 2 and NF-κB: an odd couple that shapes breast cancer phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2013) 137(2):329–36. 10.1007/s10549-012-2351-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Petrasek J, Dolganiuc A, Csak T, Nath B, Hritz I, Kodys K, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 3 and type I interferons are protective in alcoholic liver injury in mice by way of crosstalk of parenchymal and myeloid cells. Hepatology (2011) 53(2):649–60. 10.1002/hep.24059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schwabe RF, Seki E, Brenner DA. Toll-like receptor signaling in the liver. Gastroenterology (2006) 130(6):1886–900. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chang WJ, Toledo-Pereyra LH. Toll-like receptor signaling in liver ischemia and reperfusion. J Invest Surg (2012) 25(4):271–7. 10.3109/08941939.2012.687802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kim JH, Hong JM, Jeong EM, Lee WJ, Kim HR, Kang JS, et al. Lack of transglutaminase 2 diminished T-cell responses in mice. Immunology (2014) 142(3):506–16. 10.1111/imm.12282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.