Abstract
Purpose of review
The purpose of this review is to describe recent findings in the context of previous work regarding dysregulated myelopoiesis and hematopoietic function following an acute physiologic insult, focusing on the expansion and persistence of myeloid-deriver suppressor cells, the deterioration of lymphocyte number and function, and the inadequacy of stress erythropoiesis.
Recent findings
Persistent myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) expansion among critically ill septic patients is associated with T-cell suppression, vulnerability to nosocomial infection, chronic critical illness, and poor long-term functional status. Multiple approaches targeting MDSC expansion and suppressor cell activity may serve as a primary or adjunctive therapeutic intervention. Traumatic injury and the neuroendocrine stress response suppress bone marrow erythropoietin receptor expression in a process that may be reversed by nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blockade. Hepcidin-mediated iron-restricted anemia of critical illness requires further investigation of novel approaches involving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, iron administration, and hepcidin modulation.
Summary
Emergency myelopoiesis is a dynamic process with unique phenotypes for different physiologic insults and host factors. Following an acute physiologic insult, critically ill patients are subject to persistent MDSC expansion, deterioration of lymphocyte number and function, and inadequate stress erythropoiesis. Better strategies are required to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from targeted therapies.
Keywords: emergency myelopoiesis, myeloid-derived suppressor cell, sepsis, stress erythropoiesis, trauma
INTRODUCTION
Following an acute physiologic insult, granulocytes are mobilized to sites of injury, inflammation, and infection [1]. Increased T-cell apoptosis, reduced lymphopoiesis and expansion of T-regulatory population result in reduced effector cell function (ref). Simultaneously, innate immune cells have low proliferative capacity, and must be replenished by differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells through the process of emergency myelopoiesis [2].
The above-said phenomenon has been demonstrated following intra-abdominal sepsis [2–5], hemorrhage [6], burn and soft-tissue injury [7–9], and bone marrow ablation [10], but not all injuries result in emergency myelopoiesis. Intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection causes emergency myelopoiesis in mice, but the combination of hypoxia and LPS may reduce myelopoiesis [4,5]. Chemical soft-tissue injury may also trigger emergency myelopoiesis, but the combination of tissue injury and hemorrhage reduces myelopoiesis [7]. The neuroendocrine stress response, which is common to many acute physiologic insults, potentiates myelopoiesis in a process that is reversed by chemical sympathectomy [8,9,11]. Aging is associated with reduced hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) proliferative capacity, and affects regulation of genes involved in granulocyte differentiation as well as lymphocyte and mononuclear cell activation [12]. Therefore, the nature of the injury and comorbidities of the host each affect emergency myelopoiesis.
Despite the dynamic nature of emergency myelopoiesis, several events occur with relative consistency and important clinical implications. This review will describe the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets for three such events: the expansion and persistence of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MSDC), the deterioration of lymphocyte number and function, and the inadequacy of stress erythropoiesis.
MYELOID-DERIVED SUPPRESSOR CELL EXPANSION AND PERSISTENCE
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells are immature mye-loid cells with simultaneous proinflammatory and immunosuppressive properties [13,14]. In addition to influencing tumor immunity, MDSCs play an important role in acute and chronic inflammatory processes [15]. MDSCs are characterized by suboptimal phagocytic and antigen-presenting functions, but are potent producers of TNFα, IL-10, TGFB, and reactive oxygen species [16–19]. Although an initial and proportionate expansion of MDSCs may be beneficial by potentiating the early innate immune response and pathogen surveillance, persistent MDSC expansion exerts harmful effects by propagating persistent inflammation while dampening the adaptive immune response via T-cell suppression and a shift toward the Th2-adaptive immune response [1,20–22]. In a recent study of critically ill septic patients, persistent MDSC expansion was associated with T-cell suppression, nosocomial infection, chronic critical illness, and poor functional status at the time of discharge from the hospital [23▪▪].
MDSCs are intermediates in the generation of terminally differentiated myeloid populations. They originate from long-term hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that yield short-term HSCs with limited capacity for self-renewal, which become multipotent progenitors, then common myeloid progenitors, and finally MDSCs [24]. Endogenous and exogenous granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been shown to promote MDSC expansion and immunosuppressive activity [17,25]. High tyrosine-protein kinase Kit (c-Kit) activity promotes MDSC expansion and egress of immature myeloid cells from the bone marrow to peripheral blood [26,27]. Low bone marrow levels of stromal cell-derived factor one (SDF-1) are also associated with MDSC egress, and high peripheral SDF1-levels appear to have the same effect, which may be related to MDSC expression of the SDF-1 receptor, CXCR4 [28,29]. Upregulation of colony-stimulating factor one (CSF1) and its receptor, CSF1R, also appear to promote MDSC expansion and homing toward the CSF1–CSF1R axis [30,31]. Common to all of these pathways, MDSC expansion occurs whenever an acute insult prompts mobilization of mature leukocytes to peripheral sites of injury, infection, and inflammation, depleting bone marrow reserves and activating emergency myelopoiesis [24,32,33]. The degree of MDSC expansion observed following an acute physiologic insult, however, is proportionately greater than may be explained by emergency myelopoiesis alone [2,34].
MDSCs retain the capacity to differentiate into terminally differentiated populations [1,35]. Terminal differentiation of MDSCs, however, may be prevented by elevated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [36,37]. As inflammatory stimuli persist, immature myeloid cell production persists as well, with increased expression of CD31 and decreased expression of MHC class II on splenocytes expressing GR-1 in models of prolonged sepsis or tumorigenesis [23▪▪,24,38]. Beyond these observations, factors influencing MDSC terminal differentiation are poorly understood. The degree to which MDSCs exert immunosuppressive effects, however, may by attenuated through several mechanisms, including inhibition of nitrosylation, blocking IL-10 and TGFb, and by inhibition of the negative costimulatory molecule-programmed cell death protein one (PD-1) and PD ligand 1 (PD-L1), which are upregulated following sepsis, traumatic injury, and burn injury [39–41].
The potential therapeutic value of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors was demonstrated whenever sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was shown to abrogate MDSC-associated immunosuppression by reducing PD-L1 expression on MDSCs [42]. The immunomo-dulating properties of PD-1 and PDL-1 appear to be conserved between rodents and humans. Among critically ill septic patients, high levels of PD-1 expression have been associated with nosocomial infection and increased mortality [43]. PD-1 and PD-L1 may also be therapeutic targets. In murine sepsis models, PD-1 and PD-L1 knockout and inhibition have been associated with improved survival [40,44,45▪,46▪]. Among individuals with septic shock, in-vitro PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade has been associated with decreased T-cell apoptosis, decreased IL-10 production by monocytes, and restoration of normal function for neutrophils, monocytes, T cells, and natural killer cells [41,47▪▪]. Most ongoing clinical trials using PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are targeting cancer. It is, however, becoming increasingly apparent that PD-1 and PD-L1 modulation deserves further attention as a therapeutic strategy for critically ill septic patients. Recent evidence also suggests that high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) blockade may improve neutrophil function and bacterial clearance following septic insult in mice and humans [48▪].
LYMPHOPENIA AND LYMPHOCYTE DYSFUNCTION
Emergency myelopoiesis and granulocyte expansion may occur at the expense of common lymphoid progenitor production and lymphopoiesis. In addition, mature lymphocytes are adversely affected by T-cell exhaustion, increased regulatory T-cell activity, and apoptosis. The resulting lymphopenia and lymphocyte dysfunction place patients at increased risk for secondary infection following an acute physiologic insult.
Lymphopenia has been observed following human and murine sepsis, in proportion to illness severity [49–51]. Among critically ill septic patients, persistent lymphopenia and immunosuppression is associated with increased vulnerability to secondary infection with weak opportunistic pathogens and increased mortality [51,52]. T-cell exhaustion may contribute to this process. During persistent inflammation, T cells are continually exposed to antigenic and inflammatory signals, a state that is associated with deteriorating T-cell function [53,54]. Abrogating T-cell exhaustion has proven difficult. Although, there is experimental evidence to suggest that TGFb signaling is partially responsible for T-cell exhaustion [55], exogenous TGFb inhibitors have had little success [56,57]. Among mice with chronic lymphocytic choriomenigitis virus infections, the combination of PD-1 blockade and an agonistic antibody to CD137, a T-cell costimulatory molecule, was associated with expansion of viral-specific CD8+ T cells and decreased viral loads [58]. Blocking the immunosuppressive effects of hyperactive regulatory T cells has also been attempted in murine sepsis models by administering an herbal extract with potentially immunomodulat-ing properties [59] and by neutralizing IL-10 and TGFb [60]. These approaches, however, require further preclinical investigation with consistent evidence of beneficial effects prior to clinical translation.
Blocking lymphocyte apoptosis has also been proposed as a therapeutic strategy [61]. This approach is supported by murine studies in which overexpression of Bcl-2, an antiapoptotic protein, is associated with improved survival following sepsis [62–64], and that blockade of the Fas/Fas ligand pathway has reduced mortality among septic mice [65,66]. In human and murine sepsis, endotoxin-stimulated monocytes have been shown to release caspase-1 and induce lymphocyte apoptosis in a process that is reversed by caspase-1 inhibition [67,68]. Unfortunately, the success of caspase blockade is hindered by incomplete caspase inhibition, as small amounts of uninhibited caspase are sufficient to damage deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and initiate cell death [69]. Nonselective caspase blockade may inhibit monocyte activation and inflammatory cytokine release, attenuating the early inflammatory response and potentially impacting the immune response to sepsis upstream of the effects of caspase blockade on lymphocyte populations [70▪]. Therefore, the timing and selectivity of cas-pase inhibition for sepsis must be carefully considered and tailored to the therapeutic objective, recognizing that an effective host response to sepsis involves a robust early innate immune response, an effective late adaptive immune response, and downregulation of systemic inflammation and restoration of homeostasis after the infection is contained. A currently registered clinical trial is investigating caspase-4 and caspase-5 expressions in LPS-stimulated and nonstimulated monocytes from septic patients (NCT02539147). Monocyte apoptosis among septic patients is also being studied in the context of subcutaneous administration of thymosin a1 (NCT02883595), an immunomodulat-ing medication, which has shown efficacy in improving survival among septic patients whenever administered in combination with ulinastatin [71▪].
STRESS ERYTHROPOIESIS AND ANEMIA
An acute physiologic insult may be accompanied by increased oxygen demand, prompting increased erythrocyte production through stress erythropoie-sis. Stress erythropoiesis, however, is often blunted by myeloid shifts away from erythrocyte production [72▪,73▪]. This shift promotes granulocyte and monocyte production as part of the emergency myelopoi-esis response at the cost of decreased erythropoiesis [74▪▪]. Among critically ill patients, management of severe anemia often involves red blood cell transfusion, which is associated with immune suppression, infectious complications, and increased mortality [75–77]. Therefore, better strategies are needed to promote effective erythropoiesis among critically ill patients.
Iron dysregulation likely contributes to inadequate stress erythropoiesis. Bone marrow iron consumption and the rate of erythropoiesis may increase by as much as 10-fold and 5-fold, respectively [78,79]. Iron trafficking, however, is often dysregulated during systemic inflammatory states. Hepcidin and its receptor, ferroportin, are key regulators of iron trafficking. Ferroportin is present on enterocytes, macrophages, and hepatocytes, which are ideal locations to facilitate iron absorption, procurement from senesced erythrocytes, storage, and mobilization. Exogenous hepcidin and genetic upregulation of hepcidin are associated with decreased serum iron levels and iron-restricted erythropoiesis [80,81], whereas hepcidin gene inactivation is associated with iron overload [82,83]. Following an acute physiologic insult, elevated IL-6 levels and bone morphogenic protein (BMP) activation stimulate hepcidin production [84–86], potentiating an acute iron-restricted anemia. The hepcidin antagonist, lexatepid, has demonstrated efficacy in increasing serum iron levels in a recent randomized trial of endotoxin injection in healthy individuals, and appeared to be well tolerated [87]. The use of hepcidin antagonists in the ICU setting, however, has not yet been reported. Instead, management of severe anemia among critically ill patients often involves red blood cell transfusion, which is associated with immunomodulation, nosocomial infection, and increased mortality [75,88–90]. These effects are especially problematic for critically ill patients who are already at increased risk for secondary infection because of innate and adaptive immune dysfunction.
Anemic states also trigger extramedullary eryth-ropoiesis in the spleen and liver, embryonic and fetal sites of erythropoiesis [91]. Extramedullary erythropoiesis is activated by global hypoxia, upre-gulation of BMP-4 [92,93], hedgehog signaling [94,95], and activation of the stem cell factor–c-Kit axis [96,97]. Extramedullary erythropoiesis is also upregulated by psychological stress alone, illustrating the importance of the neuroendocrine stress response in modulating erythropoiesis [11]. Following severe traumatic injury, erythroid progenitor growth in the spleen is significantly increased, though the magnitude of this increase may be insufficient to compensate for the degree of anemia [98▪]. In addition, extramedullary hematopoiesis is associated with MDSC expansion [99▪], suggesting that erythropoiesis in the spleen and liver are components of emergency myelopoiesis, wherein different components of the granulocytic lineage respond to signaling pathways that are unique to the physiologic insult and host response.
Endogenous and exogenous erythropoietin potentiate stress erythropoiesis [100]. Erythropoie-tin binds to surface receptors on erythroid progenitor cells, activating several intracellular signaling pathways, including mitogen-activated kinase (MAPK), signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (Stat5), and phosphoinositide-3 kinase–Akt pathways [101–103]. Although hypoxia, anemia, and stress upregulate erythropoietin, a pro-inflammatory state may render the bone marrow unable to respond to endogenous and exogenous erythropoi-etin. Hepcidin may play a key role in potentiating erythropoietin resistance [104▪▪]. In rat models of severe traumatic injury and chronic activation of the neuroendocrine stress response, plasma eryth-ropoietin is significantly elevated, but erythropoie-tin receptor expression is suppressed in the bone marrow and spleen [98▪,105▪]. Likewise, severely injured trauma patients have elevated plasma eryth-ropoietin, but decreased bone marrow expression of the erythropoietin receptor (unpublished observation). Abrogating the neuroendocrine stress response via nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blockade or central nervous system-sympathetic inhibition may have the capacity to restore eryth-ropoietin receptor expression and curtail persistent anemia following severe injury and chronic stress (manuscript under review).
In a randomized trial, nonselective beta-adren-ergic receptor blockade administration to severely injured trauma patients was associated with increased bone marrow growth of erythroid progenitors, but did not significantly increase hemoglobin levels or decrease red blood cell transfusions [106]. This trial, however, may have been underpowered to detect differences in hemoglobin levels and transfusions. Nonselective beta blockade has also demonstrated efficacy in promoting erythroblast maturation following burn injury [72▪,73▪]. In two multicenter randomized trials, administration of recombinant erythropoietin to critically ill medical and surgical patients increased hemoglobin and decreased red cell transfusions, without adverse effects [107,108]. In a subsequent multicenter randomized trial, exogenous erythropoietin administration was associated with increased incidence of thrombotic events and did not significantly decrease red cell transfusions, but was associated with lower mortality among trauma patients (hazard ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.23–0.69) [109], which may be attributable to modulation of inflammation and apoptosis by erythropoietin.
Recent work has focused on the optimal approach to iron-restricted anemia of critical illness. In a recent multicenter randomized trial [110], iron supplementation to critically ill trauma patients was well tolerated, without increased risk for infection despite very high ferritin concentrations (>1000 ng/ml), but did not significantly increase hemoglobin levels or decrease red blood cell transfusion requirements. Critically ill trauma patients are being actively recruited to a randomized trial of intravenous iron administration with and without oral administration of oxandrolone, a commercially available anabolic steroid that may mitigate the effects of hepcidin (NCT02047552).
CONCLUSION
Following an acute physiologic insult, emergency myelopoiesis allows for mobilization of granulocytes to sites of injury, inflammation, and infection, and replenishes granulocyte populations by differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Several phenomena may adversely affect the host response, including the expansion and persistence of MDSCs, the deterioration of lymphocyte number and function, and the inadequacy of stress erythropoiesis. Recent and ongoing studies are elucidating pathophysiology and identifying therapeutic targets to improve myelopoiesis and hemato-poietic function following trauma and sepsis. Future research should continue to investigate the safety and efficacy of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, caspase inhibitors, beta blockers, and combinations of iron, erythropoietin, and hepcidin modulators for critically ill patients with bone marrow dysfunction. As emergency myelopoiesis is a dynamic process with unique phenotypes for different injuries and host factors, better strategies are needed to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from targeted therapies.
KEY POINTS.
Emergency myelopoiesis is a dynamic process with unique phenotypes for different physiologic insults and host factors.
Following an acute physiologic insult, critically ill patients are subject to persistent MDSC expansion, deterioration of lymphocyte number and function, and inadequate stress erythropoiesis.
Better strategies are needed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from targeted therapies.
Acknowledgments
A.M.M. and L.M.M. were supported by P50 GM111152–01 awarded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). A.M.M. was supported by R01 GM105893-01A1 from the NIGMS. T.J.L. was supported by a postgraduate training grant (T32 GM-008721) in burns, trauma, and perioperative injury from the NIGMS.
Footnotes
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
▪ of special interest
▪▪ of outstanding interest
- 1.Delano MJ, Scumpia PO, Weinstein JS, et al. MyD88-dependent expansion of an immature GR-1(+)CD11b(+) population induces T cell suppression and Th2 polarization in sepsis. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1463–1474. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scumpia PO, Kelly-Scumpia KM, Delano MJ, et al. Cutting edge: bacterial infection induces hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell expansion in the absence of TLR signaling. J Immunol. 2010;184:2247–2251. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kelly-Scumpia KM, Scumpia PO, Delano MJ, et al. Type I interferon signaling in hematopoietic cells is required for survival in mouse polymicrobial sepsis by regulating CXCL10. J Exp Med. 2010;207:319–326. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mohr AM, Upperman JS, Taneja R, et al. Differential effects of acute hypoxia and endotoxin on the secretion and expression of bone marrow interleukin-1 and interleukin-6. Shock. 1997;7:324–331. doi: 10.1097/00024382-199705000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Livingston DH, Wang MT, Hsieh J, et al. Hemorrhagic shock inhibits lipo-polysaccharide-induced myelopoiesis in both germ-free and conventional rats. Surgery. 1992;112:773–779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheshier SH, Prohaska SS, Weissman IL. The effect of bleeding on hema-topoietic stem cell cycling and self-renewal. Stem Cells Dev. 2007;16:707–717. doi: 10.1089/scd.2007.0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Raff G, Livingston DH, Wang MT, Rameshwar P. Hemorrhagic shock abolishes the myelopoietic response to turpentine-induced soft tissue injury. J Surg Res. 1995;59:75–79. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1995.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen MJ, Shankar R, Stevenson J, et al. Bone marrow norepinephrine mediates development of functionally different macrophages after thermal injury and sepsis. Ann Surg. 2004;240:132–141. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000130724.84914.d6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tang Y, Shankar R, Gamboa M, et al. Norepinephrine modulates myelopoi-esis after experimental thermal injury with sepsis. Ann Surg. 2001;233:266–275. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200102000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Morrison SJ, Wright DE, Weissman IL. Cyclophosphamide/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces hematopoietic stem cells to proliferate prior to mobilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:1908–1913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vignjevic S, Budec M, Markovic D, et al. Chronic psychological stress activates BMP4-dependent extramedullary erythropoiesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:91–103. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nacionales DC, Szpila B, Ungaro R, et al. A detailed characterization of the dysfunctional immunity and abnormal myelopoiesis induced by severe shock and trauma in the aged. J Immunol. 2015;195:2396–2407. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:162–174. doi: 10.1038/nri2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bronte V. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in inflammation: uncovering cell subsets with enhanced immunosuppressive functions. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:2670–2672. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Sinha P. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: linking inflammation and cancer. J Immunol. 2009;182:4499–4506. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rodrigues JC, Gonzalez GC, Zhang L, et al. Normal human monocytes exposed to glioma cells acquire myeloid-derived suppressor cell-like properties. Neuro Oncol. 2010;12:351–365. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nop023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Filipazzi P, Valenti R, Huber V, et al. Identification of a new subset of myeloid suppressor cells in peripheral blood of melanoma patients with modulation by a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulation factor-based antitumor vaccine. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2546–2553. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.5829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Heim CE, Vidlak D, Kielian T. Interleukin-10 production by myeloid-derived suppressor cells contributes to bacterial persistence during Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic biofilm infection. J Leukoc Biol. 2015;98:1003–1013. doi: 10.1189/jlb.4VMA0315-125RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao X, Rong L, Zhao X, et al. TNF signaling drives myeloid-derived suppressor cell accumulation. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:4094–4104. doi: 10.1172/JCI64115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Youn JI, Gabrilovich DI. The biology of myeloid-derived suppressor cells: the blessing and the curse of morphological and functional heterogeneity. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:2969–2975. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Darcy CJ, Minigo G, Piera KA, et al. Neutrophils with myeloid derived suppressor function deplete arginine and constrain T cell function in septic shock patients. Crit Care. 2014;18:R163. doi: 10.1186/cc14003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Janols H, Bergenfelz C, Allaoui R, et al. A high frequency of MDSCs in sepsis patients, with the granulocytic subtype dominating in Gram-positive cases. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;96:685–693. doi: 10.1189/jlb.5HI0214-074R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23▪▪.Mathias B, Delmas AL, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, et al. Human myeloid-derived suppressor cells are associated with chronic immune suppression after severe sepsis/septic shock. Ann Surg. 2017;265:827–834. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001783. This study examined MDSC expansion and immunosuppressive activity for 28 days following severe sepsis and septic shock, correlating MDSC expansion with T-cell suppression and adverse clinical outcomes. Patients with persistent MDSC expansion had increased nosocomial infections, chronic critical illness, and poor long-term functional status. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cuenca AG, Delano MJ, Kelly-Scumpia KM, et al. A paradoxical role for myeloid-derived suppressor cells in sepsis and trauma. Mol Med. 2011;17:281–292. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2010.00178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marigo I, Bosio E, Solito S, et al. Tumor-induced tolerance and immune suppression depend on the C/EBPbeta transcription factor. Immunity. 2010;32:790–802. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Heissig B, Hattori K, Dias S, et al. Recruitment of stem and progenitor cells from the bone marrow niche requires MMP-9 mediated release of kit-ligand. Cell. 2002;109:625–637. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00754-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pan PY, Wang GX, Yin B, et al. Reversion of immune tolerance in advanced malignancy: modulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cell development by blockade of stem-cell factor function. Blood. 2008;111:219–228. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-04-086835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Panka DJ, Liu Q, Geissler AK, Mier JW. Effects of HDM2 antagonism on sunitinib resistance, p53 activation, SDF-1 induction, and tumor infiltration by CD11b+/Gr-1+ myeloid derived suppressor cells. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 29.Yang L, Huang J, Ren X, et al. Abrogation of TGF beta signaling in mammary carcinomas recruits Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells that promote metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xu J, Escamilla J, Mok S, et al. CSF1R signaling blockade stanches tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells and improves the efficacy of radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:2782–2794. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhu Y, Knolhoff BL, Meyer MA, et al. CSF1/CSF1R blockade reprograms tumor-infiltrating macrophages and improves response to T-cell checkpoint immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer models. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5057–5069. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ueda Y, Cain DW, Kuraoka M, et al. IL-1R type I-dependent hemopoietic stem cell proliferation is necessary for inflammatory granulopoiesis and reactive neutrophilia. J Immunol. 2009;182:6477–6484. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ueda Y, Kondo M, Kelsoe G. Inflammation and the reciprocal production of granulocytes and lymphocytes in bone marrow. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1771–1780. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tebartz C, Horst SA, Sparwasser T, et al. A major role for myeloid-derived suppressor cells and a minor role for regulatory T cells in immunosuppression during Staphylococcus aureus infection. J Immunol. 2015;194:1100–1111. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kusmartsev S, Cheng F, Yu B, et al. All-trans-retinoic acid eliminates immature myeloid cells from tumor-bearing mice and improves the effect of vaccination. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4441–4449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fricke I, Mirza N, Dupont J, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-trap overcomes defects in dendritic cell differentiation but does not improve antigen-specific immune responses. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4840–4848. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gabrilovich D, Ishida T, Oyama T, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits the development of dendritic cells and dramatically affects the differentiation of multiple hematopoietic lineages in vivo. Blood. 1998;92:4150–4166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meyer C, Sevko A, Ramacher M, et al. Chronic inflammation promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cell activation blocking antitumor immunity in transgenic mouse melanoma model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:17111–17116. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108121108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Monaghan SF, Thakkar RK, Tran ML, et al. Programmed death 1 expression as a marker for immune and physiological dysfunction in the critically ill surgical patient. Shock. 2012;38:117–122. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31825de6a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Huang X, Venet F, Wang YL, et al. PD-1 expression by macrophages plays a pathologic role in altering microbial clearance and the innate inflammatory response to sepsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A. 2009;106:6303–6308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809422106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang Y, Li J, Lou J, et al. Upregulation of programmed death-1 on T cells and programmed death ligand-1 on monocytes in septic shock patients. Crit Care. 2011;15:R70. doi: 10.1186/cc10059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ozao-Choy J, Ma G, Kao J, et al. The novel role of tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the reversal of immune suppression and modulation of tumor microenviron-ment for immune-based cancer therapies. Cancer Res. 2009;69:2514–2522. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Guignant C, Lepape A, Huang X, et al. Programmed death-1 levels correlate with increased mortality, nosocomial infection and immune dysfunctions in septic shock patients. Crit Care. 2011;15:R99. doi: 10.1186/cc10112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brahmamdam P, Inoue S, Unsinger J, et al. Delayed administration of anti-PD-1 antibody reverses immune dysfunction and improves survival during sepsis. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88:233–240. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0110037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45▪.Young WA, Fallon EA, Heffernan DS, et al. Improved survival after induction of sepsis by cecal slurry in PD-1 knockout murine neonates. Surgery. 2017;161:1387–1393. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.008. Wild-type and PD-1−/− mice were subjected to intra-abdominal sepsis by cecal slurry and assessed for inflammatory cytokine markers, blood and peritoneal fluid cultures, and survival over the course of 7 days. PD-1−/− mice had increased IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα levels, increased peritoneal neutrophil influx, maintenance of peritoneal B-cell populations, and lower mortality than wild-type mice. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46▪.Shindo Y, McDonough JS, Chang KC, et al. Anti-PD-L1 peptide improves survival in sepsis. J Surg Res. 2017;208:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.099. Mice were subjected to intra-abdominal sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture, followed by intravenous injection of Candida albicans on postoperative day 3, followed by randomization to receive a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor or inactive peptide on postoperative day 5. Mice that received the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor had significantly lower mortality. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47▪▪.Patera AC, Drewry AM, Chang K, et al. Frontline science: defects in immune function in patients with sepsis are associated with PD-1 or PD-L1 expression and can be restored by antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;100:1239–1254. doi: 10.1189/jlb.4HI0616-255R. Blood from septic patients, critically ill nonseptic patients, and healthy controls was analyzed for leukocyte function and the impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade. Neutrophil and monocyte function progressively deteriorated with prolonged sepsis whereas PD-L1+ neutrophil populations expanded. PD-1 and PDL-1 inhibition restored neutrophil, monocyte, T-cell, and natural killer cell function. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48▪.Gregoire M, Tadie JM, Uhel F, et al. Frontline science: HMGB1 induces neutrophil dysfunction in experimental sepsis and in patients who survive septic shock. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;101:1281–1287. doi: 10.1189/jlb.5HI0316-128RR. Mice were subjected to intra-abdominal sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture, and bone marrow neutrophils were isolated 7 days after sepsis. Mice that received anti-HMGB1 antibodies had improved NADPH oxidase activity. A similar effect was observed for neutrophils from humans recovering from septic shock. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Remick DG, Newcomb DE, Bolgos GL, Call DR. Comparison of the mortality and inflammatory response of two models of sepsis: lipopolysaccharide vs. cecal ligation and puncture. Shock. 2000;13:110–116. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200013020-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Swanson PE, et al. Sepsis-induced apoptosis causes progressive profound depletion of B and CD4+ T lymphocytes in humans. J Immunol. 2001;166:6952–6963. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Le Tulzo Y, Pangault C, Gacouin A, et al. Early circulating lymphocyte apoptosis in human septic shock is associated with poor outcome. Shock. 2002;18:487–494. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200212000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Boomer JS, To K, Chang KC, et al. Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure. JAMA. 2011;306:2594–2605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wherry EJ, Kurachi M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:486–499. doi: 10.1038/nri3862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kahan SM, Wherry EJ, Zajac AJ. T cell exhaustion during persistent viral infections. Virology. 2015;479–480:180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tinoco R, Alcalde V, Yang Y, et al. Cell-intrinsic transforming growth factor-beta signaling mediates virus-specific CD8+ T cell deletion and viral persistence in vivo. Immunity. 2009;31:145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Garidou L, Heydari S, Gossa S, McGavern DB. Therapeutic blockade of transforming growth factor beta fails to promote clearance of a persistent viral infection. J Virol. 2012;86:7060–7071. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00164-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Boettler T, Cheng Y, Ehrhardt K, von Herrath M. TGF-beta blockade does not improve control of an established persistent viral infection. Viral Immunol. 2012;25:232–238. doi: 10.1089/vim.2011.0079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vezys V, Penaloza-MacMaster P, Barber DL, et al. 4-1BB signaling synergizes with programmed death ligand 1 blockade to augment CD8 T cell responses during chronic viral infection. J Immunol. 2011;187:1634–1642. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Liu QY, Yao YM, Yu Y, et al. Astragalus polysaccharides attenuate postburn sepsis via inhibiting negative immunoregulation of CD4+ CD25(high) T cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hiraki S, Ono S, Tsujimoto H, et al. Neutralization of interleukin-10 or transforming growth factor-beta decreases the percentages of CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in septic mice, thereby leading to an improved survival. Surgery. 2012;151:313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hotchkiss RS, Coopersmith CM, Karl IE. Prevention of lymphocyte apopto-sis–a potential treatment of sepsis? Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(Suppl 7):S465–S469. doi: 10.1086/431998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Oberholzer C, Oberholzer A, Bahjat FR, et al. Targeted adenovirus-induced expression of IL-10 decreases thymic apoptosis and improves survival in murine sepsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11503–11508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181338198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Iwata A, Stevenson VM, Minard A, et al. Over-expression of Bcl-2 provides protection in septic mice by a trans effect. J Immunol. 2003;171:3136–3141. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hotchkiss RS, Swanson PE, Knudson CM, et al. Overexpression of Bcl-2 in transgenic mice decreases apoptosis and improves survival in sepsis. J Immunol. 1999;162:4148–4156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chung CS, Xu YX, Wang W, et al. Is Fas ligand or endotoxin responsible for mucosal lymphocyte apoptosis in sepsis? Arch Surg. 1998;133:1213–1220. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.11.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hotchkiss RS, Chang KC, Swanson PE, et al. Caspase inhibitors improve survival in sepsis: a critical role of the lymphocyte. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:496–501. doi: 10.1038/82741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sarkar A, Hall MW, Exline M, et al. Caspase-1 regulates Escherichia coli sepsis and splenic B cell apoptosis independently of interleukin-1beta and interleukin-18. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:1003–1010. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-546OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Exline MC, Justiniano S, Hollyfield JL, et al. Microvesicular caspase-1 mediates lymphocyte apoptosis in sepsis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Methot N, Huang J, Coulombe N, et al. Differential efficacy of caspase inhibitors on apoptosis markers during sepsis in rats and implication for fractional inhibition requirements for therapeutics. J Exp Med. 2004;199:199–207. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70▪.Oliva-Martin MJ, Sanchez-Abarca LI, Rodhe J, et al. Caspase-8 inhibition represses initial human monocyte activation in septic shock model. Onco-target. 2016;7:37456–37470. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9648. Human and murine monocytes were exposed to LPS with nonselective caspase inhibition or selective caspase-8 inhibition. For human monocytes, caspase-8 inhibition was associated with decreased monocyte activation, increased monocyte necroptosis, decreased expression of IL-1 beta and IL-10. For murine monocytes, caspase-8 inhibition was ineffectual, but nonselective caspase inhibition decreased monocyte activation and increased monocyte necroptosis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71▪.Wang FY, Fang B, Qiang XH, et al. The efficacy and immunomodulatory effects of ulinastatin and thymosin alpha1 for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9508493. doi: 10.1155/2016/9508493. This systematic review and meta-analysis included six randomized trials investigating the utility of immunomodulating agents, ulinastatin and thymosin alpha1, for patients with sepsis. The combination of ulinastatin and thymosin alpha1 was associated with shorter ICU length of stay, fewer ventilator days, and increased 28-day survival. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72▪.Hasan S, Mosier MJ, Conrad P, et al. Terminal maturation of orthochromatic erythroblasts is impaired in burn patients. J Burn Care Res. 2017 doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000592. [Epub ahead of print] Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from burn patients exhibited impaired enucleation and maturation in a process that was reversed by culture with plasma from healthy individuals. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73▪.Hasan S, Johnson NB, Mosier MJ, et al. Myelo-erythroid commitment after burn injury is under beta-adrenergic control via MafB regulation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2017;312:C286–C301. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00139.2016. Mice subjected to a scald burn injury exhibited decreased production of mega-karyocyte and erythrocyte precursors. Nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blockade increased megakaryocyte erythrocyte progenitor production. A similar phenomenon was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from burn patients. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74▪▪.Johnson NB, Posluszny JA, He LK, et al. Perturbed MafB/GATA1 axis after burn trauma bares the potential mechanism for immune suppression and anemia of critical illness. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;100:725–736. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1A0815-377R. Mice subjected to burn injury demonstrated production of multipotential stem cells, and shifted myelopoiesis away from megakaryocyte erythrocyte precursors toward granulocyte monocyte precursors. Induction of V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibro-sarcoma oncogene homolog B played an important role in this process, which may be targeted and abrogated by administration of small interfering RNA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, et al. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002;288:1499–1507. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.12.1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Charles A, Shaikh AA, Walters M, et al. Blood transfusion is an independent predictor of mortality after blunt trauma. Am Surg. 2007;73:1–5. doi: 10.1177/000313480707300101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Malone DL, Dunne J, Tracy JK, et al. Blood transfusion, independent of shock severity, is associated with worse outcome in trauma. J Trauma. 2003;54:898–905. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000060261.10597.5C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Finch C. Regulators of iron balance in humans. Blood. 1994;84:1697–1702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kim A, Nemeth E. New insights into iron regulation and erythropoiesis. Curr Opin Hematol. 2015;22:199–205. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Rivera S, Liu L, Nemeth E, et al. Hepcidin excess induces the sequestration of iron and exacerbates tumor-associated anemia. Blood. 2005;105:1797–1802. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Roy CN, Mak HH, Akpan I, et al. Hepcidin antimicrobial peptide transgenic mice exhibit features of the anemia of inflammation. Blood. 2007;109:4038–4044. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-051755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Nicolas G, Bennoun M, Devaux I, et al. Lack of hepcidin gene expression and severe tissue iron overload in upstream stimulatory factor 2 (USF2) knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8780–8785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151179498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Viatte L, Lesbordes-Brion JC, Lou DQ, et al. Deregulation of proteins involved in iron metabolism in hepcidin-deficient mice. Blood. 2005;105:4861–4864. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Nemeth E, Rivera S, Gabayan V, et al. IL-6 mediates hypoferremia of inflammation by inducing the synthesis of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1271–1276. doi: 10.1172/JCI20945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Rodriguez R, Jung CL, Gabayan V, et al. Hepcidin induction by pathogens and pathogen-derived molecules is strongly dependent on interleukin-6. Infect Immun. 2014;82:745–752. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00983-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Armitage AE, Eddowes LA, Gileadi U, et al. Hepcidin regulation by innate immune and infectious stimuli. Blood. 2011;118:4129–4139. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-351957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.van Eijk LT, John AS, Schwoebel F, et al. Effect of the antihepcidin Spie-gelmer lexaptepid on inflammation-induced decrease in serum iron in humans. Blood. 2014;124:2643–2646. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-559484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Opelz G, Vanrenterghem Y, Kirste G, et al. Prospective evaluation of pretransplant blood transfusions in cadaver kidney recipients. Transplantation. 1997;63:964–967. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199704150-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Offner PJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL, et al. Increased rate of infection associated with transfusion of old blood after severe injury. Arch Surg. 2002;137:711–716. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.6.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Vamvakas EC, Moore SB. Blood transfusion and postoperative septic complications. Transfusion. 1994;34:714–727. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.34894353470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Paulson RF, Shi L, Wu DC. Stress erythropoiesis: new signals and new stress progenitor cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2011;18:139–145. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32834521c8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lenox LE, Perry JM, Paulson RF. BMP4 and Madh5 regulate the erythroid response to acute anemia. Blood. 2005;105:2741–2748. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wu DC, Paulson RF. Hypoxia regulates BMP4 expression in the murine spleen during the recovery from acute anemia. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Murtaugh LC, Chyung JH, Lassar AB. Sonic hedgehog promotes somitic chondrogenesis by altering the cellular response to BMP signaling. Genes Dev. 1999;13:225–237. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.2.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lau CI, Outram SV, Saldana JI, et al. Regulation of murine normal and stress-induced erythropoiesis by Desert Hedgehog. Blood. 2012;119:4741–4751. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-387266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Agosti V, Karur V, Sathyanarayana P, et al. A KIT juxtamembrane PY567-directed pathway provides nonredundant signals for erythroid progenitor cell development and stress erythropoiesis. Exp Hematol. 2009;37:159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Perry JM, Harandi OF, Paulson RF. BMP4, SCF, and hypoxia cooperatively regulate the expansion of murine stress erythroid progenitors. Blood. 2007;109:4494–4502. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98▪.Alamo IG, Kannan KB, Loftus TJ, et al. Severe trauma and chronic stress activates extramedullary erythropoiesis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83:144–150. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001537. Rats were subjected to severe traumatic injury and daily chronic stress for 7 days following injury. In splenic tissue, severe trauma and chronic stress were associated with increased expression of BMP4 and erythropoietin, decreased expression of the erythropoietin receptor, and increased hematopoietic progenitor colony growth. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99▪.Li Y, Zhou T, Wang Y, et al. The protumorigenic potential of FTY720 by promoting extramedullary hematopoiesis and MDSC accumulation. Oncogene. 2017;36:3760–3771. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.2. Nude mice were inoculated with colon cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma cell lines, resulting tumors were injected into the flank of immune-competent mice, and these mice were randomized to receive the immunosuppressive drug FTY720 daily for 3 weeks. FTY720 administration was associated with extramedullary hemato-poiesis, MDSC expansion, and increased tumor growth. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Millot S, Andrieu V, Letteron P, et al. Erythropoietin stimulates spleen BMP4-dependent stress erythropoiesis and partially corrects anemia in a mouse model of generalized inflammation. Blood. 2010;116:6072–6081. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Hattangadi SM, Wong P, Zhang L, et al. From stem cell to red cell: regulation of erythropoiesis at multiple levels by multiple proteins, RNAs, and chromatin modifications. Blood. 2011;118:6258–6268. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-356006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ghaffari S, Kitidis C, Zhao W, et al. AKT induces erythroid-cell maturation of JAK2-deficient fetal liver progenitor cells and is required for Epo regulation of erythroid-cell differentiation. Blood. 2006;107:1888–1891. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zhang J, Lodish HF. Endogenous K-ras signaling in erythroid differentiation. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:1970–1973. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.16.4577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104▪▪.Petruliene K, Ziginskiene E, Kuzminskis V, et al. Hepcidin serum levels and resistance to recombinant human erythropoietin therapy in hemodialysis patients. Medicina (Kaunas) 2017;53:90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2017.03.001. Patients on long-term hemodialysis who were receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) were classified by their response to erythropoietin, calculated by dividing ESA dose by hemoglobin level. Patients who were poorly responsive to ESA had significantly higher serum hepcidin levels than patients with a good response, and hepcidin levels had an inverse correlation with hemoglobin levels. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105▪.Alamo IG, Kannan KB, Smith MA, et al. Characterization of erythropoietin and hepcidin in the regulation of persistent injury-associated anemia. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81:705–712. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001163. Rats were subjected to severe traumatic injury and daily chronic stress for 7 days. Plasma erythropoietin was significantly increased, but bone marrow erythropoietin receptor expression was decreased, and animals remained persistently anemic 7 days after injury. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Bible LE, Pasupuleti LV, Alzate WD, et al. Early propranolol administration to severely injured patients can improve bone marrow dysfunction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:54–60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, et al. Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2827–2835. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Rodriguez RM, et al. Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in the critically ill patient: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:2346–2350. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199911000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Fabian TC, et al. Efficacy and safety of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:965–976. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Pieracci FM, Stovall RT, Jaouen B, et al. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial of IV iron supplementation for anemia of traumatic critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2048–2057. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
