ABSTRACT
Intuitively, excess caloric intake causes adipose tissue expansion. However, the signals and mechanisms by which this systemic trigger directs a local response in the adipose tissue are incompletely understood. Both hypertrophy of existing adipocytes and the generation of new adipocytes through differentiation of adipocyte precursor cells (APCs), contribute to adipose tissue expansion in response to changes in the diet. Ex vivo studies of this process elucidated an elegant network of mostly transcription factors that drive APCs through the differentiation (adipogenesis) process. Here we discuss our study that identified an Adamts1 signal as a glucocorticoid and diet responsive regulator of an extracellular relay system that modulates the initiation of this intracellular adipogenesis program in APCs. Furthermore, we describe how we applied sensitive tools that enable monitoring of endogenous APC activity to study the early response to high-fat diet in vivo.
Keywords: adipocyte stem cells, adipogenesis, glucocorticoids, high fat diet, obesity
Introduction
Changes in dietary intake can have a major impact on adipose tissue.1,2 High-calorie diets that exceed the total energy expenditure of the body lead to increased adipose tissue mass. As excess caloric intake in the diet is the leading cause of obesity,3 studying this process holds promise for revealing novel insights into the pathogenesis of obesity that enable the development of new approaches to address this major health problem.
Adipose tissue can expand by both hypertrophy of mature adipocytes and by the generation of new adipocytes through adipogenesis of precursor cells.1 Both of these processes have been studied extensively but there are particularly significant barriers to examining adipogenesis in vivo. These obstacles include the difficulties of studying the systemic nature of the signals that trigger adipogenesis as well as technical hurdles of identifying, monitoring and tracing endogenous precursor cells in the adipose depots. As a result, adipogenesis has primarily been studied in vitro using pharmacological stimulation of either immortalized cell-lines that attempt to model true precursor cell biology or heterogeneous stromal vascular fractions harvested from adipose tissue depots.4 Using these approaches, a large number of studies have led to the generation of a detailed molecular map of the intracellular cascade of events that propel adipocyte precursor cells through the differentiation process.5 However, there remains a substantial knowledge gap in our understanding of how this differentiation cascade is physiologically gated and triggered in vivo.
Glucocorticoids, particularly dexamethasone, are commonly used as a critical component of a cocktail of pharmacological agents that induce adipogenesis in vitro.6 Glucocorticoids are also frequently used in vivo because of their efficacy in treating a broad array of medical conditions. However, one of the most common side effects of systemic glucocorticoids, when used for extended periods of time or at high-doses, is the induction of obesity7 suggesting that excess glucocorticoids promotes adipogenesis even if they are physiologically dispensable for this process.8 Because of these in vitro and in vivo properties, we elected to use glucocorticoids as medically relevant molecular probes to reveal molecular mechanisms that regulate adipose tissue expansion.
Our studies also apply recent advances in the stem cell biology of adipocyte precursor cells (APCs). Even though using primary endogenous APCs, rather than cell lines or heterogeneous populations of surrogate cells, is time-consuming and technically demanding, we believe that the rationale that using this approach will more clearly define physiologically relevant pathways and modes of regulating adipogenesis is compelling. While it remains unresolved if there are multiple distinct APC populations, we feel there are robust data from multiple independent laboratories that the population of Lin(-):CD29(+):CD34(+):Sca-1(+) cells, isolated from adipose depot are bona fide APCs. Data on this population of APCs, which include their ability to reconstitute an adipose depot in vivo9 and lineage tracing studies,10,11 provide a foundation for studying adipogenesis in vivo.
Results
Using glucocorticoids and monitoring endogenous APCs, we interrogated how systemic cues communicate a signal to initiate adipogenesis in vivo.12 We discovered that increasing circulating glucocorticoid levels by exogenous administration of dexamethasone inhibits the expression of the Adamts1 gene in mature adipocytes. Furthermore, we found that Adamts1 expression leads to the production of ADAMTS1 protein, which is then secreted from the mature adipocytes. Our data indicate that extracellular ADAMTS1 signals to other adipocytes, resulting in the induction of secretion of PTN protein. PTN, again acting as an extracellular protein, signals to APCs and inhibits adipogenesis by modulating Wnt signaling. When we generated transgenic mice that constitutively overexpress Adamts1 in adipocytes (Adam Tg), we found that these animals have smaller adipose depots compared to wild-type littermates. Furthermore, we confirmed that overexpression of ADAMTS1 in Adam Tg mice is sufficient to block the effects of glucocorticoids on APCs.
We interrogated the endogenous APCs in Adam Tg mice using EdU pulse-chase experiments to monitor the levels of adipogenesis in vivo.12 As mature adipocytes do not divide, EdU labeling of mature adipocytes can only occur from the differentiation of a pulse-labeled precursor cell and, therefore, the number of EdU positive mature adipocytes detected after a chase reflects the level of adipogenesis that occurred during that same interval. In this way, we established that Adam Tg mice have significantly lower rates of adipogenesis in vivo compared to wild-type littermate controls. In addition, we demonstrated that Adam Tg mice can be rescued from the block in adipogenesis phenotype, again using in vivo approaches: We found that injecting Adam Tg mice with an antibody that neutralizes PTN activity is sufficient to restore adipogenesis to wild-type levels. In addition to defining a critical pathway that regulates the initiation of the cell-intrinsic adipogenesis cascade in endogenous APCs in vivo, these studies also establish that extracellular signaling is the essential mechanism by which this process is regulated.
Together, these data validate our approach of using medically relevant glucocorticoids to elucidate an in vivo mechanism for gating the initiation of adipogenesis. We were next inspired to test how this pathway might relate to physiological induction of adipogenesis in response to a high-calorie diet. The use of high-fat diet (HFD) is the most validated approach to study diet-induced obesity. Therefore, we tested if the ingestion of HFD impacts Adamts1 signaling.12 Importantly, we conducted these studies in wild-type mice to test for the physiological relevance of Adamts1. Indeed, we found that in adipose depots where HFD induces adipogenesis, Adamts1 expression was also repressed by HFD. Next, to test if HFD-induced adipogenesis is dependent on the repression of Adamts1, we repeated the studies using Adamts1 Tg mice, where expression of Adamts1 persists in adipose tissue irrespective of the ingestion HFD. Importantly, these studies revealed that the repression of Adamts1 expression is essential for HFD-induced adipogenesis.
We were intrigued by the fact that a pathway regulated by exogenously administered glucocorticoids is essential for HFD-induced adipogenesis and speculated that endogenous glucocorticoids might have a role in the physiological regulation of Adamts1 pathway in response to HFD. Given the depot-specificity of the induction of adipogenesis by HFD, we hypothesized that changes in glucocorticoid levels in response to HFD would be tissue specific, rather than systemic. Tissue-specific regulation of glucocorticoids is a well-established process mediated by context-specific expression of two enzymes (11BHSD1 and 11BHSD2), which activate and inactivate intracellular glucocorticoids respectively.13 Remarkably, we found that ingestion of HFD leads to adipose depot-specific activation of the 11BHSD enzymes: Expression of the glucocorticoid activating enzyme 11BHSD1 is induced in depots where adipogenesis is induced by HFD and expression of the glucocorticoid inactivating enzyme 11BHSD2 is induced in depots where adipogenesis is not induced.12 These data indicate that a pathway that is critical for diet-induced adipogenesis is embedded within physiological glucocorticoid signaling. Furthermore, the results illuminate a novel mechanistic paradigm by which depot-specific induction of adipogenesis is specified.
In addition to monitoring adipogenesis, our approaches enable us to interrogate the activity of the endogenous APC population. Specifically, by combining in vivo EdU pulse-chase with flow cytometery of the APC population we elucidated the impact of Adamts1 signaling on both adipogenesis as well as the rates of APC proliferation.12 Because of the sensitivity of these techniques, we decided to extend these investigations of the adipose tissue and APC population to an early timepoint after the initiation of HFD. Intriguingly, after just one month of HFD, we detected depot-specific changes in the Adamts1 signal in adipose tissue in response to HFD (Fig. 1A, B). These changes were associated with depot-specific responses in the APC population: We detected an induction of adipogenesis in the perigonadal visceral adipose depot (gWAT) while in the subcutaneous inguinal depot (iWAT) the rate of proliferation of APCs was induced (Fig. 1C, D).
Figure 1.
Depot-specific changes in response to 1-month of high-fat diet. qRT-PCR measuring the expression levels of Adamts1 and Ptn in the iWAT (A) and gWAT (B) adipose depots after one month of HFD compared to mice fed standard chow diet (Control). Flow cytometry of iWAT and gWAT adipose depots measuring the number of EdU positive mature adipocytes (C) and APCs (D) after a pulse-chase after one month of HFD.
Discussion
In conclusion, we identified a diet responsive extracellular signal that directs APCs in the decision to differentiate. Our studies support the model that this depot-specific response to the HFD is coordinated by differential modulation of Adamts1 and Ptn levels, leading to distinct activation of Wnt signaling in APCs. The extracellular nature of the ADAMTS1-PTN-Wnt pathway is particularly intriguing to us, as unraveling the implications for this mechanism will likely expose an important new understanding of systemic regulation of adipose tissue. We speculate that this extracellular pathway evolved as a means to keep the adipose depot size itself in homeostatic balance under basal conditions by the sum of competing and synergizing endocrine, paracrine and other systemic signals that serve to gate or balance any one trigger with inputs from additional cues. In addition, this system is able to maintain responsiveness to stimuli that summon adipose depot expansion when needed. Testing this hypothesis would include identifying counter-regulatory signals to the potent Adamts1 signal that modulate APC activity. Furthermore, it will be of particular interest to elucidate if these putative counter-regulatory signals also converge on Wnt signaling or if entirely independent intracellular mechanisms are responsible for gating the initiation of differentiation in APCs.
An additional interesting feature of the Adamts1 pathway we identified is the ADAMTS1 relay to induce PTN as a critical step for the pathway function. Strikingly, we found that inhibiting PTN with a neutralizing antibody completely rescued APCs from the APC proliferation and differentiation phenotype in vivo in the Adamts1 Tg mice. While the logic of embedding a relay system into the regulation of APCs is not fully apparent from our studies, we speculate that this enhances the coordination and feedback with the systemic environment. In support of this hypothesis, our data demonstrate that HFD results in a decrease in circulating levels of PTN in the mouse models and circulating PTN also decreased in humans participating in an overfeeding study.12 Drawing a comparison with other regions of the endocrine system, the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis appears to utilize a similar approach, with hormones secreted from the hypothalamus for a short-range stimulation of the pituitary gland to secrete secondary hormones that circulate and implement the effects.14 As with the HPA axis, we hypothesize that the ADAMTS1-PTN relay controlling APCs, enables multilevel feedback loops that modulate the final signal.
In summary, we identified Adamts1 as the modulator of a potent pathway that converts changes in diet into a cellular signal in adipose tissue that controls APC activity in vivo.12 These findings reveal a previously unrecognized control mechanism for adipose tissue to respond to increased caloric intake by adjusting the rate of APC differentiation. Elucidating the pathways by which high-calorie diets generate a cellular signal governing adipogenesis could lead to the development of new approaches for the treatment and prevention of obesity and associated disorders such as diabetes.
Methods
Mice
All studies were approved by Stanford University's Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care Committee. For the HFD experiments in wild-type mice, 10 week-old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories and fed a diet with 60% kcals from fat (Bioserv, F3282) ad libitum for 1 month.
In vivo EdU labeling
5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) (Carbosyth) was administered by intraperitoneal injections (100 mg/kg) once every day for 2 weeks. For flow cytometric analysis, SVF was prepared and stained for surface markers as previously described 12 using the following the antibodies: SCA1 APC (BioLegend, 108112), CD45 PE-Cy7 (eBioscience, 25-0421-82), CD31 PE-Cy7 (eBioscience, 25-0311-81). Samples were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/PBS for 30 minutes, and then permeabilized in 1x saponin-based permeabilization buffer (Invitrogen) for 10 minutes. EdU was labeled using the Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor 488 Flow Cytometry Assay Kit (Invitrogen) by following the manufacturer's protocol. For adipocyte EdU-labeled nuclei analysis, adipocyte nuclei were isolated in cold nuclei extraction buffer (320 mM sucrose, 5mM MgCl2, 10mM HEPES, 2% Triton X-100, pH 7.4) in a dounce homogenizer. Nuclei were centrifuged at 3000 X g for 15 min and washed with cold nuclei wash buffer (320 mM sucrose, 5mM MgCl2, 10mM HEPES, 1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide, pH 7.4). EdU nuclei were labeled using the Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor 488 Flow Cytometry Assay Kit. DAPI (500 ng/mL) was added to cells or nuclei immediately prior to FACS analysis.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of Interest
Stanford University has filed a patent related to the discoveries described in this manuscript.
Funding
The work was funded by an NIH Director's New Innovator Award (DP2 OD006740), R01DK114217 and the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research to B.J.F.. J.C.W. was supported by the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health, Stanford NIH-NCATS-CTSA UL1 TR001085, and the Child Health Research Institute of Stanford University. B.J.F. is the Bechtel Endowed Faculty Scholar in Pediatric Translational Medicine.
References
- [1].Rutkowski JM, Stern JH, Scherer PE. The cell biology of fat expansion. J Cell Biol 2015; 208(5):501-12; PMID:25733711; https://doi.org/ 10.1083/jcb.201409063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Morrison RF, Farmer SR. Hormonal signaling and transcriptional control of adipocyte differentiation. J Nutr 2000; 130(12):3116S-21S; PMID:11110883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Roberto CA, Swinburn B, Hawkes C, Huang TT, Costa SA, Ashe M, Zwicker L, Cawley JH, Brownell KD. Patchy progress on obesity prevention: emerging examples, entrenched barriers, and new thinking. Lancet 2015; 385(9985):2400-9; PMID:25703111; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61744-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Rosen ED, MacDougald OA. Adipocyte differentiation from the inside out. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7(12):885-96; PMID:17139329; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Cristancho AG, Lazar MA. Forming functional fat: a growing understanding of adipocyte differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12(11):722-34; PMID:21952300; https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm3198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].MacDougald OA, Mandrup S. Adipogenesis: forces that tip the scales. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002; 13(1):5-11; PMID:11750856; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1043-2760(01)00517-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Berthon BS, MacDonald-Wicks LK, Wood LG. A systematic review of the effect of oral glucocorticoids on energy intake, appetite, and body weight in humans. Nutr Res (New York, N.Y.) 2014; 34(3):179-90; PMID:24655484; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Park YK, Ge K. Glucocorticoid receptor accelerates, but is dispensable for, Adipogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 2017; 37(2):e00260-16. PMID:PMC5214856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Rodeheffer MS, Birsoy K, Friedman JM. Identification of white adipocyte progenitor cells in vivo. Cell 2008; 135(2):240-9; PMID:18835024; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Krueger KC, Costa MJ, Du H, Feldman BJ. Characterization of Cre recombinase activity for in vivo targeting of adipocyte precursor cells. Stem Cell Reports 2014; 3(6):1147-58; PMID:25458893; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.10.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Sanchez-Gurmaches J, Hsiao WY, Guertin DA. Highly selective in vivo labeling of subcutaneous white adipocyte precursors with Prx1-Cre. Stem Cell Reports 2015; 4(4):541-50; PMID:25801508; https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Wong JC, Krueger KC, Costa MJ, Aggarwal A, Du H, McLaughlin TL, Feldman BJ. A glucocorticoid- and diet-responsive pathway toggles adipocyte precursor cell activity in vivo. Sci Signal 2016; 9(451):ra103; PMID:27811141; https://doi.org/ 10.1126/scisignal.aag0487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Tomlinson JW, Walker EA, Bujalska IJ, Draper N, Lavery GG, Cooper MS, Hewison M, Stewart PM. 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: a tissue-specific regulator of glucocorticoid response. Endocr Rev 2004; 25(5):831-66; PMID:15466942; https://doi.org/ 10.1210/er.2003-0031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Smith SM, Vale WW. The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2006; 8(4):383-95; PMID:17290797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]