Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2017 Mar 27;120(1):123–133. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx020

Species climate range influences hydraulic and stomatal traits in Eucalyptus species

Aimee E Bourne 1, Danielle Creek 1, Jennifer M R Peters 1, David S Ellsworth 1, Brendan Choat 1,*
PMCID: PMC5737682  PMID: 28369162

Abstract

Background and Aims Plant hydraulic traits influence the capacity of species to grow and survive in water-limited environments, but their comparative study at a common site has been limited. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether selective pressures on species originating in drought-prone environments constrain hydraulic traits among related species grown under common conditions.

Methods Leaf tissue water relations, xylem anatomy, stomatal behaviour and vulnerability to drought-induced embolism were measured on six Eucalyptus species growing in a common garden to determine whether these traits were related to current species climate range and to understand linkages between the traits.

Key Results Hydraulically weighted xylem vessel diameter, leaf turgor loss point, the water potential at stomatal closure and vulnerability to drought-induced embolism were significantly (P < 0·05) correlated with climate parameters from the species range. There was a co-ordination between stem and leaf parameters with the water potential at turgor loss, 12 % loss of conductivity and the point of stomatal closure significantly correlated.

Conclusions The correlation of hydraulic, stomatal and anatomical traits with climate variables from the species’ original ranges suggests that these traits are genetically constrained. The conservative nature of xylem traits in Eucalyptus trees has important implications for the limits of species responses to changing environmental conditions and thus for species survival and distribution into the future, and yields new information for physiological models.

Keywords: Cavitation, embolism, climate, drought, Eucalyptus, hydraulics, stomatal closure, leaf water relations, xylem anatomy

INTRODUCTION

Sensitivity to drought has been identified as an important factor shaping plant species distributions and community composition (BassiriRad et al., 1999; Engelbrecht et al., 2007; Kursar et al., 2009). The ability of plant species to grow and survive under different moisture regimes and to withstand drought is dependent on a number of physiological, anatomical and morphological traits including stomatal regulation of water loss, osmotic adjustment of leaf turgor loss point, rooting depth and xylem structure, as well as whole-plant adjustments such as root and leaf mass fraction, leaf area ratio and root length (Anderson et al., 1996; Villar-Salvador et al., 1997; Schulze et al., 2006; Baltzer et al., 2008; Bourne et al., 2015; Pfautsch et al., 2016). Xylem cavitation resistance has emerged as a key variable in relation to plant drought resistance and the distribution of plants across gradients of water availability (Kursar et al., 2009; Choat et al., 2012; Schuldt et al., 2015; Anderegg et al., 2016). Low precipitation and high evaporative demand will drive high potential evapotranspiration and a decline in plant water potential and increase in xylem tension. Although declining water potentials can be delayed by stomatal closure and leaf shedding, prolonged drought will eventually result in extensive xylem cavitation, a sharp reduction in hydraulic conductivity, canopy die back and ultimately death of the whole plant (Choat, 2013; Nardini et al., 2013).

Stomatal function is linked with hydraulic characteristics because (1) the plant hydraulic system controls the rate at which water can be transported to the canopy (Sperry et al., 2002; Brodribb and Holbrook, 2003) and (2) stomatal regulation must maintain xylem water potentials within a range that limits cavitation to maintain hydraulic integrity (Delzon and Cochard, 2014). Plants with high stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetic rates therefore generally require high hydraulic conductivity (Brodribb and Feild, 2000; Santiago et al., 2004; Choat et al., 2011). Hydraulic conductivity is proportional to the sum of all conduit diameters to the fourth power (Tyree and Ewers, 1991), thus a small increase in vessel diameter results in large increases in hydraulic conductivity (Kh). However, xylem traits that promote high Kh may also increase the risk of cavitation and hydraulic dysfunction within the plant (Loepfe et al., 2007; Sperry et al., 2008). Subsequently, plants face trade-offs between hydraulic safety (e.g. high cavitation resistance) and hydraulic efficiency (high Kh) in order to survive and maintain productivity within the climate of their native distribution (Sperry et al., 2008; Pittermann et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 2011).

In the context of plant hydraulics, efficiency is defined as the amount of water transpired for a given pressure drop along the hydraulic pathway (Tyree et al., 1994); thus, a more efficient hydraulic system requires a smaller pressure drop to transport a given amount of water, and is usually promoted by wider, longer xylem vessels. Conversely, hydraulic safety is promoted by narrower, shorter, more frequent xylem vessels and thicker, less porous pit membranes in the hydraulic system (Sperry et al., 2006, 2008; Loepfe et al., 2007; Jansen et al., 2009). These adaptations enhance drought tolerance (Baas, 1986; Choat et al., 2005), the degree to which a plant has adapted to maintain cell water status under dry or arid conditions (Oliver et al., 2010), by limiting the spread of embolism between xylem vessels via air-seeding (Loepfe et al., 2007; Choat et al., 2008). However, these adaptations also compromise hydraulic efficiency, resulting in lower maximum Kh and therefore the rate at which water can be delivered to the transpiring leaf surface for a given pressure gradient (Sperry et al., 2008; Pittermann et al., 2010). This trade-off between safety and efficiency (Nardini and Salleo, 2000; Sperry et al., 2008; Johnson et al., 2011) forms the basis for the co-ordination of stem hydraulic traits and consequently their relationship to stomatal traits previously reported (Brodribb et al., 2003; Meinzer et al., 2009). Studies examining the co-ordination between stomatal conductance and stem hydraulics have reported that the point of stomatal closure occurs prior to the onset of cavitation and is related to stem vulnerability and the water potential at turgor loss point (ΨTLP) in different species (Brodribb and Holbrook, 2003; Brodribb et al., 2003; Martorell et al., 2014). However, uncertainty remains about how these safety vs. efficiency trade-offs are related to species climatic distribution, particularly when species are grown in a common climate. Additionally, some species are reported to maintain low hydraulic safety and efficiency (Gleason et al., 2016), presenting a challenge for understanding xylem evolution. Understanding this relationship is an important precursor to predicting how species survival and productivity can be affected under current and future climatic conditions.

The selective pressures that prevail within a particular climate constrain species adaptations and subsequently which characteristics are maintained in future generations (Ramirez-Valiente et al., 2010). While species from arid regions may benefit from maintaining a low stomatal conductance, increasing water use efficiency by minimizing transpiration, they also benefit from maintaining a hydraulic system that is resistant to cavitation and offers greater redundancy, i.e. narrow, short and frequent xylem vessels. Alternatively, a species originating from humid areas where water is readily available may benefit from anatomical characteristics oriented towards higher hydraulic conductance, assimilation rates and productivity (Fichot et al., 2009). Species oriented towards hydraulic efficiency typically exhibit stomatal closure at higher leaf and stem water potentials, allowing them high transport rates when water is available but minimizing the risk of cavitation when water deficits develop (Nolf et al., 2015). In this way, while trait values favouring hydraulic safety may be selected for in species from more arid regions (e.g. Schuldt et al., 2015; Pfautsch et al., 2016), hydraulic efficiency and enhanced productivity through access to light, water and nutrient resources are more likely to drive selection in species from more humid regions.

Previous studies have reported correlations between climate and stomatal behaviour (Héroult et al., 2013; Bourne et al., 2015), hydraulic characteristics (Brodribb and Hill, 1999; Maherali et al., 2004; Mitchell et al., 2008; Beikircher and Mayr, 2009; Choat et al., 2012), vessel anatomy (Villar-Salvador et al., 1997; Noshiro and Baas, 2000; Fisher et al., 2007; Medeiros and Pockman, 2014; Schreiber et al., 2015; Pfautsch et al., 2016) and leaf tissue water relations (White et al., 2003; Bartlett et al., 2012). However, many of these studies compare different species along environmental gradients, which does not allow for determination of climatic effects on hydraulic, stomatal and leaf physiological traits of individual species. Common garden studies, which enable environmental conditions to be kept constant, can provide information on the influence of genotype on hydraulic traits. Despite the importance of these traits in determining drought tolerance, survival and water use under different climatic conditions, relatively few studies have utilized common gardens to examine genotypic constraints on hydraulic traits. Previous common garden studies have provided valuable insights into the effects of species climate range on hydraulic characteristics (Vander Willigen et al., 2000), leaf water relations (Baltzer et al., 2008) and xylem anatomy (Schreiber et al., 2015). However, to date, there are no studies that address the influence of species climate range on stomatal, hydraulic and anatomical traits in trees species constrained to a single genus.

Using a common garden plantation of Eucalyptus species, we ask whether species climate range, specifically the mean annual precipitation (MAP) and vapour pressure deficit (D), influences the leaf water relations, xylem anatomy, and hydraulic and stomatal characteristics of a species. We expect that selective pressures from the species native climate constrain the genotypes maintained within a species and thus that the water use strategies employed by different species will be linked to the climate of species range. Our specific hypotheses for this study are: (1) xylem anatomy, leaf tissue water relations, and stomatal and hydraulic traits will correlate with precipitation and D of the native distribution of species; and (2) there is a co-ordination of stem hydraulics with leaf tissue water relations and the point of stomatal closure across species from different climatic ranges. Comparing multiple species from the same genus within a common garden, where confounding environmental and phylogenetic factors are minimized, allows extrapolation of genetic constraints on hydraulic, anatomical, stomatal and leaf tissue water relations traits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site

The study was conducted in a plantation of Eucalyptus species at Richmond, New South Wales, Australia (33º33′S, 150º44′E) near the Hawkesbury River on alluvial floodplain at an elevation of 25 m. The local climate is sub-humid temperate, characterized by hot summers and the low possibility of frost during winter (approx. 13 times annually). Mean annual temperature is 17 ºC, with a mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature of 30·1 ºC and 3·5 ºC generally achieved in January and July, respectively. Annual rainfall is 801 mm, with a mean maximum and minimum rainfall of 129 mm and 32 mm per month, respectively, distributed fairly evenly but with the majority of rain falling in summer months. The plantations were established in September 2007 in a paddock with occasional weed control, as described previously in Héroult et al. (2013) and Bourne et al. (2015). The plantation consisted of two replicate, monoculture plots of each of five Eucalyptus species, namely Eucalyptus cladocalyx, E. crebra, E. dunnii, E. grandis and E. tereticornis, where each plot contained 35 individual trees planted at a density of 1000 trees ha–1 with a spacing of 2·6 m along the row and 3·85 m between rows. An additional monoculture plot of 160 trees of E. saligna was planted alongside these plantations with the same spacing at the same time. Seedlings were fertilized at planting in September 2007, watered by hand for the first 4 months of establishment, and replaced as required within the first year, with survival of all individuals at the time of measurement. Measurements were conducted on 4- to 5-year-old trees of each species with average tree heights of 8·8, 8·3, 13·1, 15·5, 11·1 and 12·8 m for E. cladocalyx, E. crebra, E. dunnii, E. grandis, E. saligna and E. tereticornis, respectively. The driest part of each species range, being the lowest mean annual precipitation observed in the species range, was used as an indication of their ability to tolerate dry conditions, and in accordance with the Koppen–Geiger climate classification system we classified E. cladocalyx and E. crebra as sub-humid climate zone species, E. tereticornis as a sub-humid/humid intermediate species, and E. dunnii, E. grandis and E. saligna as humid zone species. We used climate maps in Peel et al. (2007) overlain with species distributions from the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA; www.ala.org.au) for these classifications, consistent with Bourne et al. (2015).

Leaf tissue water relations

We conducted measurements of pressure volume (PV) isotherms to measure leaf tissue water relations using techniques described by Tyree and Hammel (1972). A mature, sunlit leaf from six different trees of each of six species, namely E. cladocalyx, E. crebra, E. dunnii, E. grandis, E. saligna and E. tereticornis, was collected from the upper third of the tree crown. These measurements provided leaf tissue water relation traits as described by Koide et al. (2000) and Sack et al. (2003) and obtained using a spreadsheet available from PrometheusWiki (Sack et al., 2011).

Anatomical characteristics

Estimates of vessel diameter and density were obtained for E. cladocalyx, E. crebra, E. dunnii, E. grandis, E. saligna and E. tereticornis trees. Sections of 20 μm thickness were taken from one separate branch segment from the upper third of the tree crown from each of five different trees using a sliding microtome. Photographs of these sections, stained with 0·05 % (w/v) Toluidine blue, were taken using a digital camera (ProgRes® C14, JenOptik, Hallam, Australia) with the Lumix Progress C4 software as seen at × 40 (vessel counts) and ×100 (vessel diameter) magnification under a microscope (Olympus BX60, Center Valley, PA, USA). We analysed these images and measured vessel diameter of all vessels >300 μm2 throughout the sapwood of each section using ImageJ processing and analysis software (Abramoff et al., 2004). Hydraulically weighted vessel diameter (Dh), consistent with that measured by Sperry and Saliendra (1994), was calculated for interspecific comparisons of vessel anatomy and correlations with climate.

Stem hydraulics

Five to six branches from separate trees of E. cladocalyx, E. crebra, E. dunnii, E. grandis, E. saligna and E. tereticornis, with up to six 4–9 cm long sub-samples per branch, were harvested from the upper third of the tree crown using a boom lift (Snorkel MHP13/35 Trailer Mounted Lift, Snorkel Ltd, Meadowbrook, Qld, Australia) and measured for stem hydraulic characteristics. Xylem vulnerability curves were constructed using the bench dehydration method (Sperry et al., 1988) where branches were progressively dried down at 25 ºC for between one and 12 cumulative hours dependent on species selected, branch size and the desired water potential. Regardless of segment lengths considered, bench dehydration provides more accurate vulnerability estimates for long-vesseled species, prone to the ‘open vessel’ artefact, than either air injection or centrifuge methods (Choat et al., 2010, 2016; Cochard et al., 2013). As Eucalyptus species have long vessels (>1 m length), bench dehydration was used here.

Xylem tension was relaxed prior to measurements in order to avoid possible excision artefacts (Wheeler et al., 2013; Torres-Ruiz et al., 2015). Preliminary testing of xylem tension relaxation in these species revealed that rehydration for up to 2 h followed by progressive cutting back underwater from upstream and downstream ends achieved the best results. Accordingly, stems were harvested close to dawn and rehydrated for 2 h in a walk-in cold room set to 4 ºC. The first cut was made to the upstream end of the branch underwater, at least 30 cm from the desired segment, and left to rehydrate for 10 min. Successive cuts were made at 2 min intervals, allowing rehydration between each cut, alternating between upstream and downstream ends of the segment. Water potentials on excised leaves were measured prior to cutting the branch using a Scholander type pressure chamber (Model 1505D Pressure Chamber Instrument, PMS Instrument Company, Albany, OR, USA). Initial hydraulic conductivity (Kinitial) and final hydraulic conductivity (Kfinal) were measured using a 0·003 MPa pressure head and logged using a digital liquid flow meter (Liqui-Flow L10, Bronkhorst High-Tech BV, Ruurlo, Gelderland, The Netherlands) and flow analysis programs FlowDDE (V. 4.69) and FlowPlot (Versions 4·69 and 3·34, respectively, Bronkhorst FlowWare, http://downloads.bronhorst.com). Kfinal was measured after flushing the stem segment with 2 mmol KCl solution at a pressure of 175 kPa for 20 min or until bubbles were no longer emitted from the segment.

Stomatal conductance and water relations measurements

Measurements of gs and stem water potential (Ψstem) were made on progressively dehydrated E. cladocalyx, E. crebra, E. dunnii, E. grandis, E. saligna and E. tereticornis branches over 13 sunny days at times when trees were well hydrated post-rainfall events and evaporative demand was not sufficiently high to cause rapid dry-down of branches. Branches were collected from the upper third of five trees of each species using a boom lift, cut underwater and then transferred to water-filled buckets. Branches were kept in the sun and left to transpire for 30 min prior to measurements, while leaves on secondary branches adjacent to gs measurement leaves were bagged and foiled, ready for measurements of Ψstem. Four open-flow portable photosynthesis systems with 6400-01 leaf chambers (Li6400, Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) and a Scholander-type pressure chamber were used to measure gs and Ψstem, respectively. Cuvette light levels and temperatures were adjusted to ambient conditions, as determined from a nearby weather station (Héroult et al., 2013; Bourne et al., 2015) and the portable photosynthesis systems. Chamber humidity was maintained as close as possible to ambient conditions at the beginning of measurements (approx. 70 % humidity) by removing a small amount of water vapour commensurate with that expected to be added by leaves during measurements. For each measurement, the CO2 mole fraction within the chamber and at the leaf surface (Ca) was set at ambient levels (390 μmol mol–1 CO2) by mixing CO2 from an internal source (CO2 cartridge) with outside air. Stomatal ratios determined from microscopic observations of stomatal peels were used to correct stomatal ratios for each species. Three to eight fully expanded, healthy leaves on each branch were placed inside the cuvette and then logged five times for each gs observation once the leaf reached equilibrium (coefficient of variation for Anet and gs < 1 %). Eucalyptus tereticornis and E. saligna only had overwintering leaves, while all other species had fully expanded, hardened leaves, yet stomatal conductance values were consistent with those conducted on fully expanded, hardened leaves for E. tereticornis from an earlier measurement campaign. Measurement leaves and adjacent foiled and bagged leaves were then measured for Ψleaf and Ψstem, respectively. Branches were then dried to more negative water potentials by removing them from the bucket, and gs and Ψstem were measured regularly until all available leaves were exhausted or gs reached zero.

Statistical analysis

Species climate range and distributional co-ordinates of the different species were mined from the ALA (http://spatial.ala.org.au/; accessed 12 December 2014) and synthesized and plotted using R (R Development Core Team, 2014). A drawback of this approach is that it may include planted trees as well as those in their native distribution. The ALA species distributional data were trimmed to include only data between the first and 99th percentile as a small number of locations, such as those from botanical gardens and herbariums, were outside the natural distributional range of species. We conducted pairwise Pearson correlations of traits from species leaf tissue water relations, stomatal behaviour and hydraulic measurements against specific climate parameters of the species range using JMP (v. 5.0.1, SAS, Cary, NC, USA). A large number of climate parameters averaged across the species range are inter-related, and we focused analysis on a few of these as key climate indicators (mean annual precipitation and maximum monthly vapour pressure deficit), with a wider set of climate parameters considered elsewhere (see Supplementary Data Table S1). Maximum monthly vapour pressure deficit (Dmax) was used in analyses in the form of 1/Dmax, consistent with stomatal models based on hydraulic theory and the negative exponential relationship between stomatal conductance and D (Tardieu and Davies, 1993; Leuning, 1995; Oren et al., 1999). The Ψstem at stomatal closure was assessed at two points, the beginning of stomatal closure (gs50; when gs reached 50 % of gsmax) and complete stomatal closure (gs5; when gs reached 5 % of gsmax) by considering the point at which gs declined below a certain point of the maximum measured gs using all gs measurements. These parameters were used as indicators of stomatal behaviour as complete stomatal closure (gs = 0) was not measured. Sigmaplot (v. 11.0, Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for fitting gs vs. Ψstem curves and obtaining 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using sigmoidal three parameter (E. cladocalyx and E. crebra), sigmoidal four parameter (E. saligna and E. tereticornis), Chapman (E. dunnii) and quadratic (E. grandis) functions based on those that best represented the data. A Weibull function as re-parameterized by Ogle et al. (2009) was used for fitting vulnerability curves, from which 50 % loss of conductivity (P50) values and 95 % CIs were calculated in R (R Development Core Team, 2014) using the fitplc package (Duursma and Choat, 2017).

RESULTS

Climate range is related to leaf tissue water relations, xylem anatomy, and stomatal and hydraulic characteristics

All except one of the Eucalyptus species in our study were distributed along the eastern coastline of Australia, with some species, such as E. crebra, distributed into more arid, inland regions of Australia (Fig. 1). The exception to this was E. cladocalyx, which was distributed along the south-eastern coastline of Australia and was also distributed into more arid, inland regions (Fig. 1). Eucalyptus dunnii, E. cladocalyx, E. grandis and E. saligna had narrower distributional ranges compared with the other species, and E. dunnii had the most restricted distribution of all species (Fig. 1), though the native range of E. cladocalyx is also very narrow (not shown) existing in few native pockets in the Flinders Ranges, Eyre Peninsula and on Kangaroo Island. The D and MAP of climate range differed across species, with sub-humid species, E. cladocalyx and E. crebra, having a lower MAP and higher D compared with the humid species, E. saligna, E. dunnii and E. grandis, where E. tereticornis was intermediate between the two (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Distribution of six Eucalyptus species and climatic range for two climate variables related to water relations. Species distribution data were extracted from Atlas of Living Australia (ALA; http://www.ala.org.au; accessed 5 February 2015). In maps, black points represent the species distribution according to ALA. Boxplots indicate the maximum mean monthly D (left) and MAP (right) from the species range. The natural distribution for E. cladocalyx is actually more restricted than depicted here, but there is currently no reliable way to obtain this information.

Species climate range was related to leaf tissue water relations and xylem anatomy of the six Eucalyptus species studied (Fig. 2; Tables 1 and 2; Supplementary Data Fig. S1; Table S1). Water potential at turgor loss (ΨTLP), volume index growth rate (VIGR), osmotic potential at full turgor (Πo), gs50, Dh and P50 were correlated with MAP (R2 = 0·76, 0·84, 0·66, 0·93, 0·75 and 0·53, respectively; Fig. 2A–F;Table S1) such that species from more humid regions with a higher mean annual precipitation of species range had higher ΨTLP, VIGR and Dh and higher (less negative) P50 than species from sub-humid regions. These correlations were qualitatively similar for the inverse of maximal D (Table S1). Mean annual aridity index and monthly maximum water deficit were also significantly correlated with leaf tissue water relations, and anatomical, hydraulic and stomatal characteristics (Table S1). Furthermore, a co-ordination and correlation between these stem and leaf characteristics was also observed (Fig. 3; Table S1) where ΨTLP was significantly positively correlated with VIGR (R2 = 0·73, P = 0·03) and negatively correlated with gs50 and 12 % loss of conductivity (P12; R2 = 0·89 and 0·64, respectively; Fig. 3; Table S1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Correlations of leaf tissue water relations, xylem anatomy, growth and hydraulic characteristics with mean annual precipitation (MAP) of the species range for six climatically contrasting Eucalyptus species. Correlations and their significance are presented in Table S1. Dashed lines are shown as a guide. Error bars are the s.e.m. for each species or climate parameter, and are bidirectional.

Table 1.

Leaf tissue water relations, xylem anatomy and climate characteristics of six Eucalyptus species grown together in a common garden, with the s.e.m. across seven trees of each species

Species Class RWCTLP (%) ε (MPa) VDens (mm–2) VArea (μm2) VDiam (μm) Dh (μm) MAP (mm) AI Dmax (kPa) WDmax (mm)
E. cladocalyx Sub-humid 84·1 ± 0·7 17·4 ± 0·6 113·01 ± 10·78 917·5 ± 58·0 33·1 ± 0·9 36·0 ± 1·3 537·49 ± 3·16 0·59 ± 0·004 0·78 ± 0·007 120·3 ± 1·0
E. crebra Sub-humid 89·2 ± 1·5 26·4 ± 3·9 96·79 ± 5·89 1001·0 ± 130·3 34·3 ± 2·2 38·4 ± 2·0 743·37 ± 2·21 0·48 ± 0·001 1·00 ± 0·003 124·9 ± 0·4
E. tereticornis Intermediate 90·0 ± 0·3 22·1 ± 0·9 78·36 ± 6·01 1195·1 ± 97·9 37·6 ± 1·6 41·2 ± 1·8 971·09 ± 3·13 0·70 ± 0·002 0·67 ± 0·002 87·6 ± 0·4
E. saligna Humid 89·6 ± 0·6 22·6 ± 0·8 64·98 ± 3·85 1151·0 ± 96·0 31·4 ± 1·8 40·8 ± 1·7 1190·93 ± 3·98 0·93 ± 0·003 0·57 ± 0·001 51·2 ± 0·6
E. dunnii Humid 87·6 ± 1·3 15·3 ± 1·8 95·23 ± 3·94 1154·2 ± 83·7 36·1 ± 1·3 39·6 ± 3·5 1109·58 ± 11·22 0·83 ± 0·009 0·57 ± 0·003 33·6 ± 1·2
E. grandis Humid 88·9 ± 0·5 20·0 ± 0·8 97·52 ± 6·85 1171·3 ± 184·0 36·5 ± 2·4 41·4 ± 3·5 1476·37 ± 7·52 1·05 ± 0·006 0·53 ± 0·002 50·7 ± 0·7

VDens, VArea and VDiam are vessel density, vessel area and vessel diameter as an arithmetic mean, respectively. AI and WDmax are representative of the species range, as obtained using Atlas of Living Australia (http://www.ala.org.au; accessed 12 December 2014; climate parameters are for 2007–2010).

Table 2.

A comparison of leaf tissue water relations, hydraulic parameters and growth rates of six Eucalyptus species in a common garden

Species ΨTLP (MPa) P50 (–MPa) P12 (–MPa) P88 (–MPa) gs50 (–MPa) gs5 (–MPa) VIGR (m3 ha–1 year–1)
E. cladocalyx –3·13 ± 0·08 5·27 [6·23, 4·57] 2·74 [3·97, 1·22] 8·13 [2·30, 1·32] 3·51 [5·07, 1·94] 6·91 27 ± 5
E. crebra –2·99 ± 0·11 4·90 [5·16, 4·49] 3·26 [3·79, 2·69] 6·41 [7·14, 5·95] 3·30 [4·13, 2·53] 6·35 52 ± 11
E. tereticornis –2·47 ± 0·07 3·89 [4·30, 3·51] 2·18 [2·75, 1·60] 5·70 [6·99, 4·87] 2·43 [3·30, 1·68] 3·98 [4·74 ,3·27] 60 ± 4
E. saligna –2·50 ± 0·04 3·40 [3·78, 3·08] 1·81 [3·60, 0] 5·16 [6·72, 4·34] 2·34 [3·23, 1·73] 4·57 133
E. dunnii –2·27 ± 0·09 4·93 [5·46, 4·49] 2·18 [2·76, 1·56] 8·44 [11·12, 7·12] 2·42 [2·86, 1·84] 3·55 [4·74, 2·37] 156 ± 31
E. grandis –2·34 ± 0·04 3·83 [4·16, 3·54] 2·14 [2·62, 1·55] 5·63 [7·16, 4·90] 1·95 [2·33, 1·50] 2·28 [2·61, 1·89] 165 ± 13

Errors presented are standard errors, and numbers in square brackets are [lower, upper] 95 % confidence intervals, respectively.

No standard error is given for E. saligna VIGR as there was only one replicate plot.

In cases where upper and lower confidence intervals could not be estimated accurately, they are not given.

gs5 and gs50 are the Ψstem at complete stomatal closure (5 % of gsmax) and the beginning of stomatal closure (50 % of gsmax), respectively.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Correlations of ΨTLP with the point of stomatal closure (gs50), P50 and VIGR for six climatically contrasting Eucalyptus species. Correlations and their significance are presented in Table S1 where P = (A) 0·03, (B) 0·004 and (C) 0·05, respectively. Dashed lines are shown as a guide. Error bars are the s.e.m. for each species or climate parameter, and are bidirectional.

Stomatal and hydraulic responses to Ψstem

Stomatal conductance declined as Ψstem became progressively more negative in all species (Fig. 4). Species from humid regions tended to have higher maximal gs, lower minimum gs and a steeper decline in gs for a given drop in Ψstem compared with species from sub-humid regions (Fig. 4), though E. saligna had comparatively low gs for a humid species (Fig. 4D). Further, sub-humid species tended to maintain some level of gs at Ψstem as low as –6 MPa (Table 2; Fig. 4A, B), whereas humid species had a faster decline in gs, completely closing stomata (gs5) around or before –4 MPa (Table 2; Fig. 4C–F). Stomatal closure (gs50) started at a Ψstem of –3·5 and –3·3 MPa in the sub-humid species E. cladocalyx and E. crebra (Table 2; Fig. 4A, B), whereas in the intermediate and humid species E. tereticornis, E. saligna, E. dunnii and E. grandis, gs50 was at less negative Ψstem of –2·43, –2·34, –2·42 and –1·95 MPa, respectively (Table 2; Fig. 4C–F). Leaf level transpiration (EL) followed the same pattern as gs for all species (data not shown).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The response of gs to declining Ψstem of six climatically contrasting Eucalyptus species. The black dashed line is a spline to highlight the relationship only. Vertical, grey lines represent ΨTLP.

Vulnerability to drought-induced embolism varied between the six species (Fig. 5). Species from sub-humid regions tended to have a shallower increase in percentage loss of conductivity (PLC) for a given drop in Ψstem (Fig. 5A, B) compared with humid zone and intermediate species (Fig. 5C–F). The sub-humid species, E. cladocalyx and E. crebra, maintained a PLC of < 50 % until Ψstem –5·3 and –4·9 MPa, respectively (Table 2; Fig. 4A, B) whereas the intermediate and humid species, E. tereticornis, E. saligna, E. dunnii and E. grandis, reached P50 at –3·9, –3·4, –4·9 and –3·8 MPa, respectively (Table 2; Fig. 4C–F). For all but E. dunnii, sub-humid species P50 was significantly more negative than humid species P50, based on the 95 % CI (Fig. 4). Water potential at turgor loss (ΨTLP) was more negative in sub-humid than humid species, negatively correlated with gs50 and P12 (R2 = 0·89 and 0·64, respectively; Fig. 3B, C) and in all species was similar to, and within the confidence limits of, the Ψstem at P12 and gs50 (Table 2; Fig. 4). The difference between the lower 95 % CI of P50 and upper 95 % CI of gs50 for E. cladocalyx, E. crebra, E. tereticornis, E. saligna, E. dunnii and E. grandis was –0·50, 0·36, 0·21, –0·15, 1·63 and 1·21, respectively (Table 2). Accordingly, species from humid regions tended to have no overlap between the Ψstem at P50 and gs50, starting to close stomata on average 0·72 MPa before P50 was reached, whereas in sub-humid species gs50 tended to be within the 95 % CIs of P50 (Table 2).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The response of PLC to declining Ψstem of six climatically contrasting Eucalyptus species. The dashed line represents the relationship for all PLC vs. Ψstem data. Grouped vertical lines indicate P50 (dark grey centre line) and the 95 % CI (light grey adjacent lines) around the mean as obtained through R (R Development Core Team, 2014) using the fitplc package (Duursma and Choat 2017). The separate grey vertical line indicates the ΨTLP, as in Table 2 and Fig. 4.

DISCUSSION

Climate range related to leaf tissue water relations, xylem anatomy, and stomatal and hydraulic characteristics

We found evidence supporting our first hypothesis, that xylem anatomy, leaf tissue water relations, and stomatal and hydraulic characteristics would correlate with the MAP and D of a species range when species are grown under common environmental conditions. We observed that species from more arid regions, indicated by a lower 1/Dmax and MAP, had lower ΨTLP, Π0, VIGR and Dh and lower (more negative) P50 and gs50 than species from more humid regions (Fig. 2). At the leaf level, a more negative Π0 increases the cell’s capacity to maintain turgor at lower leaf water status (White et al., 2003; Bartlett et al., 2012); more negative Π0 and ΨTLP also allow stomata to remain open at lower water potentials. Consequently, these characteristics facilitate stomatal closure at lower water potentials (more negative gs50) and may confer a competitive advantage in sub-humid environments by enabling continued photosynthesis under water-limited conditions. Our results suggest that a hydraulic system oriented towards high cavitation resistance is favoured in regions where drought is frequent; however, these adaptations constrain the efficiency of water transport, subsequently limiting growth and disadvantaging the plant in areas of high water availability. Consistent with this, Pfautsch et al. (2016) reported that Eucalyptus species growing in arid environments have narrower xylem vessels than those growing in wet environments. The available data therefore strongly support the hypothesis that hydraulic traits of Eucalyptus species are adapted to the water availability of their native environment, consistent with Mitchell and O’Grady (2015) who reported strong selective pressures of aridity for shaping ΨTLP across 174 Australian species.

The correlations between hydraulic traits and species climate range provide evidence that these traits are genetically constrained in Eucalyptus. We observed that sub-humid species with distributions extending further inland (E. cladocalyx and E. crebra) had a higher drought tolerance than humid species with coastal distributions (E. tereticornis, E. saligna, E. dunnii and E. grandis), when considering drought tolerance to be a function of leaf tissue water relations (Fig. 2; Table 2), xylem anatomy (Fig 2; Fig. S1), stomatal behaviour (Fig. 4) and vulnerability to cavitation (Fig. 5). A study examining variation in xylem anatomical traits of Eucalyptus species growing under different rainfall regimes reported low intraspecific variation between populations, an observation consistent with low plasticity in these traits (Pfautsch et al., 2016). Similarly, previous work has suggested that phenotypic plasticity in cavitation resistance is limited (Martinez-Vilalta et al., 2009; Lamy et al., 2014), although there is some evidence of plasticity in this trait from other studies (Lopez et al., 2013; Schuldt et al., 2015). Consistent with the results of the present study, other common garden experiments have shown that differences in cavitation resistance are maintained when water availability is held constant (Sparks and Black, 1999; Vander Willigen et al., 2000), providing further evidence that this trait is under strong genetic control.

Co-ordination of stem hydraulics with stomatal behaviour

In order to test our second hypothesis, that there is a co-ordination of stem hydraulic traits with leaf tissue water relations and the point of stomatal closure across species, we compared these characteristics across six climatically contrasting Eucalyptus species. We observed tight correlations of ΨTLP with the point of stomatal closure (gs50) and P12 (Fig. 3), and a tight correlation between gs50 and P12 (R2 = 0·68, P = 0·04; Table S1) across all species, indicating a co-ordination of stem hydraulics with leaf tissue water relations and the point of stomatal closure. A correlation between ΨTLP and gs50 has previously been reported (Brodribb et al., 2003) and can be expected as stomata will close when guard cells lose turgor (Brodribb et al., 2003; Martorell et al., 2014). The results presented here suggest that Eucalyptus species close stomata prior to the occurrence of significant cavitation (P50), thus protecting the hydraulic system of the stem from dysfunction during periods of drought. We observed only one species, E. cladocalyx, for which Ψstem at gs50 and P50 were statistically similar (overlap in 95 % CIs; Table 2), while species from humid regions tended to have greater margins, with an average of 0·73 MPa difference in the 95 % CIs of these parameters (Table 2; Figs 4 and 5). This is consistent with recent work showing that stem and leaf traits are co-ordinated in woody species such that stomatal closure occurs before critical thresholds for cavitation are crossed in the stem (Delzon and Cochard, 2014; Nolf et al., 2015; Bartlett et al., 2016).

Co-ordination of leaf and stem hydraulics with stomatal behaviour allows the plant to work within narrow safety margins (Choat et al., 2012), ensuring minimal cavitation (safety) while still enhancing transpiration (efficiency) and subsequently productivity, thus benefiting the plant regardless of the environmental conditions it encounters. Consistent with this, we observed a tight relationship between volume growth rates (VIGR) and physiological traits such as leaf water relations (ΨTLP and Π0) and the point of stomatal closure (gs50, gs12 and gs5). This confirms that variation in the hydraulic strategies of these species is translated into differences in productivity and growth at the whole-plant level. Overall, our results support the existence of a fast–slow spectrum of functional traits in Eucalyptus from different climate ranges (Reich, 2014), with species from more arid climates occupying the slow (safe) end of this trait spectrum.

Conclusions

Species climate range was tightly correlated to leaf tissue water relations, xylem anatomy, the Ψstem at stomatal closure (gs50) and hydraulic characteristics of six different Eucalyptus species. Additionally, we observed co-ordination between stem hydraulics, leaf tissue water relations and the point of stomatal closure, which has been hypothesized but infrequently tested, and a difference in water use strategy linked to species climatic range. We observed that species from more humid regions exhibited characteristics of an efficient hydraulic system, preventing hydraulic dysfunction through a conservative approach to stomatal closure. In contrast, sub-humid species with ranges extending into more arid regions maintained a safe hydraulic system, limiting gs and cavitation with narrower xylem vessels, and maintaining leaf tissue characteristics tolerant of water limitation. By conducting this study on species from a single genus and measuring all species in a common garden, we eliminated much of the variation that could be attributed to different climatic or environmental characteristics. Despite minimizing this variation, we observed a significant correlation of climate with leaf tissue water relations, xylem anatomy, stomatal behaviour and hydraulic characteristics between Eucalyptus species from contrasting climates. Additionally, we observed a tighter co-ordination of stem hydraulics with leaf tissue water relations and the point of stomatal closure in humid compared with sub-humid species, indicating a difference between species in the water use strategy employed. These observations indicate that the species climatic range has a large influence on shaping species responses to the environment, supporting the theory that genetic factors influence the expression of leaf tissue water relations, xylem anatomy, stem hydraulics and stomatal behaviour. In these species, it is likely that genetics control plant structural traits in particular, since they pertain to xylem anatomy and thus are not easily modified when growing in different climates. These findings hold important implications for species survival and adaptations to changes in climate, and may assist plantation and land management decisions to ensure survival of native and planted ecosystems under future climate scenarios.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data are available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob and consist of the following. Figure S1: transverse sections of branch xylem tissue imaged with bright field microscopy at × 40 magnification for E. cladocalyx, E. crebra, E. tereticornis, E. saligna, E. dunnii and E. grandis. Table S1: pairwise correlation matrix for hydraulic and anatomical parameters with variables related to the species climate range. Table S2: list of abbreviations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Burhan Amiji for technical support throughout the course of this study, Remko Duursma for his help with statistical analyses, and Kristine Crous for assistance with gas exchange measurements. We also thank Kristine Crous, Stephanie Stuart, Tony Haigh and two external reviewers for helpful comments on a draft of the manuscript. This study was supported by the Australian Research Council [LP0992238 to D.S.E.; FT130101115 to B.C] and an Australian Postgraduate award [to A.E.B.]; with additional funding provided by the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment at Western Sydney University.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ.. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderegg WRL, Klein T, Bartlett M, et al. 2016. Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 113: 5024–5029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson J, Williams J, Kriedemann P, Austin M, Farquhar G.. 1996. Correlations between carbon isotope discrimination and climate of native habitats for diverse eucalypt taxa growing in a common garden. Functional Plant Biology 23: 311–320. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baas P. 1986. Ecological patterns of xylem anatomy In: Givinish TJ, ed. On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baltzer JL, Davies SJ, Bunyavejchewin S, Noor NSM.. 2008. The role of desiccation tolerance in determining tree species distributions along the Malay–Thai Peninsula. Functional Ecology 22: 221–231. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L.. 2012. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 15: 393–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartlett MK, Klein T, Jansen S, Choat B, Sack L.. 2016. The correlations and sequence of plant stomatal, hydraulic, and wilting responses to drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 113: 13098–13103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BassiriRad H, Tremmel DC, Virginia RA, Reynolds JF, de Soyza AG, Brunell MH.. 1999. Short-term patterns in water and nitrogen acquisition by two desert shrubs following a simulated summer rain. Plant Ecology 145: 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  9. Beikircher B, Mayr S.. 2009. Intraspecific differences in drought tolerance and acclimation in hydraulics of Ligustrum vulgare and Viburnum lantana. Tree Physiology 29: 765–775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bourne A, Haigh A, Ellsworth D.. 2015. Stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit relates to climate of origin in Eucalyptus species. Tree Physiology 35: 266–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brodribb TJ, Feild TS.. 2000. Stem hydraulic supply is linked to leaf photosynthetic capacity: evidence from New Caledonian and Tasmanian rainforests. Plant, Cell & Environment 23: 1381–1388. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brodribb T, Hill RS.. 1999. The importance of xylem constraints in the distribution of conifer species. New Phytologist 143: 365–372. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM.. 2003. Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiology 132: 2166–2173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Edwards EJ, Gutiérrez MV.. 2003. Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 443–450. [Google Scholar]
  15. Choat B. 2013. Predicting thresholds of drought-induced mortality in woody plant species. Tree Physiology 33: 669–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Choat B, Ball MC, Luly JG, Holtum JAM.. 2005. Hydraulic architecture of deciduous and evergreen dry rainforest tree species from north-eastern Australia. Trees-Structure and Function, 19: 305–311. [Google Scholar]
  17. Choat B, Cobb AR, Jansen S.. 2008. Structure and function of bordered pits: new discoveries and impacts on whole-plant hydraulic function. New Phytologist, 177: 608–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Choat B, Drayton WM, Brodersen C, et al. 2010. Measurement of vulnerability to water stress-induced cavitation in grapevine: a comparison of four techniques applied to a long-vesseled species. Plant, Cell & Environment 33: 1502–1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Choat B, Medek DE, Stuart SA, et al. 2011. Xylem traits mediate a trade-off between resistance to freeze–thaw-induced embolism and photosynthetic capacity in overwintering evergreens. New Phytologist 191: 996-1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb TJ, et al. 2012. Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491: 752–756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Choat B, Badel E, Burlett R, Delzon S, Cochard H, Jansen S.. 2016. Non-invasive measurement of vulnerability to drought-induced embolism by X-ray microtomography. Plant Physiology 170: 273–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cochard H, Badel E, Herbette S, Delzon S, Choat B, Jansen S.. 2013. Methods for measuring plant vulnerability to cavitation: a critical review. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 4779–4791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Delzon S, Cochard H.. 2014. Recent advances in tree hydraulics highlight the ecological significance of the hydraulic safety margin. New Phytologist 203: 355–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Duursma R, Choat B.. 2017. fitplc-an R package to fit hydraulic vulnerability curves. Journal of Plant Hydraulics 4: p.002. [Google Scholar]
  25. Engelbrecht BMJ, Comita LS, Condit R, et al. 2007. Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature 447: 80–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fichot R, Laurans F, Monclus R, Moreau A, Pilate G, Brignolas F.. 2009. Xylem anatomy correlates with gas exchange, water-use efficiency and growth performance under contrasting water regimes: evidence from Populus deltoides × Populus nigra hybrids. Tree Physiology 29: 1537–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fisher JB, Goldstein G, Jones TJ, Cordell S.. 2007. Wood vessel diameter is related to elevation and genotype in the Hawaiian tree Metrosideros polymorpha (Myrtaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 709–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gleason SM, Westoby M, Jansen S, et al. 2016. Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world’s woody plant species. New Phytologist 209: 123–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Héroult A, Lin Y-S, Bourne A, Medlyn BE, Ellsworth DS.. 2013. Optimal stomatal conductance in relation to photosynthesis in climatically contrasting Eucalyptus species under drought. Plant, Cell & Environment 36: 262–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jansen S, Choat B, Pletsers A.. 2009. Morphological variation of intervessel pit membranes and implications to xylem function in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 96: 409–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Johnson DM, McCulloh KA, Meinzer FC, Woodruff DR, Eissenstat DM.. 2011. Hydraulic patterns and safety margins, from stem to stomata, in three eastern US tree species. Tree Physiology 31: 659–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Koide RT, Robichaux RH, Morse SR, Smith CM.. 2000. Plant water status, hydraulic resistance and capacitance In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Rundel PW, eds. Plant physiological ecology: field methods and instrumentation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kursar TA, Engelbrecht BMJ, Burke A, Tyree MT, El Omari B, Giraldo JP.. 2009. Tolerance to low leaf water status of tropical tree seedlings is related to drought performance and distribution. Functional Ecology 23: 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lamy JB, Delzon S, Bouche PS, et al. 2014. Limited genetic variability and phenotypic plasticity detected for cavitation resistance in a Mediterranean pine. New Phytologist 201: 874–886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Leuning R. 1995. A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal–photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 339–355. [Google Scholar]
  36. Loepfe L, Martinez-Vilalta J, Pinol J, Mencuccini M.. 2007. The relevance of xylem network structure for plant hydraulic efficiency and safety. Journal of Theoretical Biology 247: 788–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lopez R, de Heredia UL, Collada C, et al. 2013. Vulnerability to cavitation, hydraulic efficiency, growth and survival in an insular pine (Pinus canariensis). Annals of Botany 111: 1167–1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Maherali H, Pockman WT, Jackson RB.. 2004. Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology 85: 2184–2199. [Google Scholar]
  39. Martinez-Vilalta J, Cochard H, Mencuccini M, et al. 2009. Hydraulic adjustment of Scots pine across Europe. New Phytologist 184: 353–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Martorell S, Diaz-Espejo A, Medrano H, Ball MC, Choat B.. 2014. Rapid hydraulic recovery in Eucalyptus pauciflora after drought: linkages between stem hydraulics and leaf gas exchange. Plant, Cell & Environment 37: 617–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Medeiros JS, Pockman WT.. 2014. Freezing regime and trade-offs with water transport efficiency generate variation in xylem structure across diploid populations of Larrea sp (Zygophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 101: 598–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Meinzer FC, Johnson DM, Lachenbruch B, McCulloh KA, Woodruff DR.. 2009. Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants: coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance. Functional Ecology 23: 922–930. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mitchell PJ, O’Grady AP.. 2015. Adaptation of leaf water relations to climatic and habitat water availability. Forests 6: 2281–2295. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mitchell PJ, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Burgess SS.. 2008. Using multiple trait associations to define hydraulic functional types in plant communities of south-western Australia. Oecologia 158: 385–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nardini A, Salleo S.. 2000. Limitation of stomatal conductance by hydraulic traits: sensing or preventing xylem cavitation? Trees-Structure and Function 15: 14–24. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nardini A, Battistuzzo M, Savi T.. 2013. Shoot desiccation and hydraulic failure in temperate woody angiosperms during an extreme summer drought. New Phytologist 200: 322–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Nolf M, Creek D, Duursma R, Holtum J, Mayr S, Choat B.. 2015. Stem and leaf hydraulic properties are finely coordinated in three tropical rain forest tree species. Plant, Cell & Environment 38: 2652–2661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Noshiro S, Baas P.. 2000. Latitudinal trends in wood anatomy within species and genera: case study in Cornus s.l. (Cornaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 1495–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ogle K, Barber JJ, Willson C, Thompson B.. 2009. Hierarchical statistical modeling of xylem vulnerability to cavitation. New Phytologist 182: 541–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Oliver M, Cushman J, Koster K.. 2010. Dehydration tolerance in plants. Methods in Molecular Biology 639: 3–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, et al. 1999. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 1515–1526. [Google Scholar]
  52. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA.. 2007. Updated world map of the Koppen–Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11: 1633–1644. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pfautsch S, Harbusch M, Wesolowski A, et al. 2016. Climate determines vascular traits in the ecologically diverse genus Eucalyptus. Ecology Letters 19: 240–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pittermann J, Choat B, Jansen S, Stuart SA, Lynn L, Dawson TE.. 2010. The relationships between xylem safety and hydraulic efficiency in the Cupressaceae: the evolution of pit membrane form and function. Plant Physiology 153: 1919–1931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ramirez-Valiente JA, Sanchez-Gomez D, Aranda I, Valladares F.. 2010. Phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation in leaf ecophysiological traits of 13 contrasting cork oak populations under different water availabilities. Tree Physiology 30: 618–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Reich PB. 2014. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology 102: 275–301. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM.. 2003. The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 1343–1356. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sack L,, Pasquet-Kok J, PrometheusWiki contributors. 2011. Leaf pressure–volume curve parameters. PrometheusWiki.
  60. Santiago LS, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, et al. 2004. Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees. Oecologia 140: 543–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schreiber SG, Hacke UG, Hamann A.. 2015. Variation of xylem vessel diameters across a climate gradient: insight from a reciprocal transplant experiment with a widespread boreal tree. Functional Ecology 29: 1392–1401. [Google Scholar]
  62. Schuldt B, Knutzen F, Delzon S, et al. 2015. How adaptable is the hydraulic system of European beech in the face of climate change-related precipitation reduction? New Phytologist 31: 13798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schulze ED, Turner NC, Nicolle D, Schumacher J.. 2006. Leaf and wood carbon isotope ratios, specific leaf areas and wood growth of Eucalyptus species across a rainfall gradient in Australia. Tree Physiology 26: 479–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sparks JP, Black RA.. 1999. Regulation of water loss in populations of Populus trichocarpa: the role of stomatal control in preventing xylem cavitation. Tree Physiology 19: 453–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sperry JS, Saliendra NZ.. 1994. Intra-plant and inter-plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis. Plant, Cell & Environment 17: 1233–1241. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sperry JS, Donnelly JR, Tyree MT.. 1988. A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant, Cell and Environment 11: 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP.. 2002. Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant, Cell and Environment 25: 251–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Pittermann J.. 2006. Size and function in conifer tracheids and angiosperm vessels. American Journal of Botany 93: 1490–1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sperry JS, Meinzer FC, McCulloh KA.. 2008. Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: scaling from tissues to trees. Plant, Cell & Environment, 31: 632–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tardieu F, Davies WJ.. 1993. Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 16: 341–349. [Google Scholar]
  71. Torres-Ruiz JM, Jansen S, Choat B, et al. 2015. Direct X-ray microtomography observation confirms the induction of embolism upon xylem cutting under tension. Plant Physiology 167: 40–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Tyree MT, Ewers FW.. 1991. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytologist 119: 345–360. [Google Scholar]
  73. Tyree MT, Hammel HT.. 1972. The measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. Journal of Experimental Botany 23: 267–282. [Google Scholar]
  74. Tyree MT, Davis SD, Cochard H.. 1994. Biophysical perspectives of xylem evoution – is there a tradeoff of hydraulic efficiency for vulnerability to dysfunction. IAWA Journal 15: 335–360. [Google Scholar]
  75. Vander Willigen C, Sherwin HW, Pammenter NW.. 2000. Xylem hydraulic characteristics of subtropical trees from contrasting habitats grown under identical environmental conditions. New Phytologist 145: 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  76. Villar-Salvador P, Castro-Diez P, Perez-Rontome C, Montserrat-Marti G.. 1997. Stem xylem features in three Quercus (Fagaceae) species along a climatic gradient in NE Spain. Trees-Structure and Function 12: 90–96. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wheeler JK, Huggett BA, Tofte AN, Rockwell FE, Holbrook NM.. 2013. Cutting xylem under tension or supersaturated with gas can generate PLC and the appearance of rapid recovery from embolism. Plant, Cell & Environment 36: 1938–1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. White DA, Battaglia M, Macfarlane C, Mummery D, McGrath JF, Beadle CL.. 2003. Selecting species for recharge management in Mediterranean south western Australia – some ecophysiological considerations. Plant and Soil 257: 283–293. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES