Abstract
Graphene decorated with metallic nanoparticles exhibits electronic, optical, and mechanical properties that neither the graphene nor the metal possess alone. These composite films have electrical conductivity and optical properties that can be modulated by a range of physical, chemical, and biological signals. Such properties are controlled by the morphology of the nanoisland films, which can be deposited on graphene using a variety of techniques, including in situ chemical synthesis and physical vapor deposition. These techniques produce non-random (though loosely defined) morphologies, but can be combined with lithography to generate deterministic patterns. Applications of these composite films include chemical sensing and catalysis, energy storage and transport (including photoconductivity), mechanical sensing (using a highly sensitive piezroresistive effect), optical sensing (including so-called “piezoplasmonic” effects), and cellular biophysics (i.e sensing the contractions of cardiomyocytes and myoblasts).
TOC image
Two current applications of metal nanoisland-graphene composites are shown.
Introduction
Graphene, when decorated with noble metal nanoparticles (“metallic nanoislands”), exhibits emergent electronic, optical, and mechanical properties found in neither large-area graphene sheets nor bulk metals. Such composite films can be regarded as a type of metamaterial. For example, the deposition of metal particles onto graphene can change its band gap,1,2 optical properties,3,4 and give rise to catalytic behavior5 and properties such as enhanced piezoresistance6 and strain-evolved optical—i.e., “piezoplasmonic”—effects.7 These properties are most closely associated with semiconducting materials, but can emerge in metal-graphene composites if the metal overlayer has the right thickness or morphology (e.g., interconnectivity or pattern).8,9 Graphene serves a dual role in these composite films. It is active in determining the optical, electronic, chemical, or biological function of these composite materials, and also serves as a physical support. Indeed, the manipulability of a graphene sheet permits transfer of these materials onto a wide variety of substrates.10,11,12,13
This minireview describes the fabrication, properties, and applications of metallic nanoislands on graphene. A summary of the phenomena and applications of this class of composite material is shown Figure 1. One finds a range of applications that is remarkable for a single class of material: chemical sensing and catalysis, energy storage and transport, mechanical sensing, optical sensing, and cellular biophysics. We begin our discussion by describing the methodologies used to deposit metal nanoparticles on graphene, and then describe applications in chemistry, energy, mechanics, and optics. Biological applications are discussed in the context of the physical modality with which biological signals are transduced.
Fabrication Strategies
Chemical Synthesis
Metallic nanoislands can be deposited on graphene directly using solution-phase synthesis.14,15,16,17,18 Crystallites of metal nucleate and grow directly on the surface of graphene, enabling the controlled growth of single crystals of metal and even complex geometries such as spheres,19 rods,20,21 or flower-like nanoparticles (Figure 2a).15 While a wet chemical method allows some degree of control of the shapes of nanoparticles, along with the crystalline quality (Figure 2b), it also results in an uncontrolled distribution of metal on the surface of graphene. A random distribution of particles may not have deleterious effects on applications such as catalysis, but limits other applications (i.e., electronics and photonics) that require deterministic placement of nanoparticles.
Physical Vapor Deposition
Physical vapor deposition (PVD) of metal, such as by electron-beam or thermal evaporation, produces disconnected nanoislands at low nominal thicknesses (Figure 2c). While the shapes of the nanoparticles produced by this method are not deterministic, some degree of control can be achieved by tuning the parameters of deposition. For example, the evaporation rate and substrate temperature can be used to control the crystallinity, size distribution, and interconnectivity of the nanoislands.22 The unique surface properties of graphene provide an additional mechanism to control the morphology of the nanoislands during deposition. Rafiee and coworkers first observed that the surface energy of the substrate supporting the graphene can influence the surface energy of the graphene—an effect known as “wetting transparency”.23,24 This phenomenon can be leveraged to control the nanoisland morphology by simply switching the substrate that is supporting the graphene during the deposition process.6 Finally, Xiang et al. reported that thermal annealing of the nanoislands after deposition can cause the nanoislands to assemble into quasi-ordered arrays.25 While limited in precision, tuning parameters in PVD and post-processing provides a simple method to control the morphology of metallic nanoislands on graphene.
Lithography
Electron-beam lithography (EBL) and photolithography offer the ability to produce deterministic patterns of metal on single-layer graphene.26,27 These methods can produce patterns with controllable periodicity and geometry, which are critical parameters in plasmonics,28 light scattering,29 and quantum tunneling.30,31 Particularly, optical sensing platforms, like SERS, benefit greatly from the precision of lithographic techniques due to the dependence of signal sensitivity on nanoparticle spacing. EBL has been used for fabrication of radially symmetric metal nanostructures on graphene with sub-micron features (Figure 2e, f). Lithographic methods, while affording deterministic control over the geometries of the nanoislands, can do so only over small areas, and scale-up may be problematic for some applications.
Chemical Applications
Gas Sensing
Metallic nanoislands on graphene have been used as sensors for a variety of gases such as hydrogen,32,33 NOx species,21 and ethanol vapor.34 In these applications, the graphene acts as an inert, flexible, and conductive substrate for the metal, which undergoes a physicochemical interaction with the gas species of interest. Changes in the resistivity in the nanoisland-graphene composite as the gas interacts with the metal can be measured. For example, Shin and coworkers demonstrated the use of palladium flower-like nanoparticles supported by graphene for hydrogen sensing as shown in Figure 3a. In this example, the shapes of the nanoparticles and sensitivities to gases were determined by the growth time of the nanoparticles.15 The sensitivity of these nanoisland-graphene composites is determined by nanoparticle surface area, which limits the chemical kinetics. Shorter reaction times lead to smaller particles with a higher surface area to volume ratio. This higher ratio increases the total amount of hydrogen that can chemisorb to the surface and thus increases the sensitivity. This trend with particle size and sensitivity has also been observed for simpler geometries such as palladium spheres on graphene (Figure 3b).35 In addition to metals, semiconductor nanoparticles, such as oxides of tin, copper, and zinc, supported by graphene, have also been used for hydrogen sensors with lower detection limits at higher temperatures than their metal counterparts.36
Catalysis
The high ratio of surface area to volume of metal nanoislands on graphene makes them useful substrates for catalysis.37,38 For this application, the graphene acts as an inert support for the metal catalyst. The flexibility of graphene allows it to adhere conformably to a surface of interest, or fold and wrinkle, increasing the active catalytic area per unit volume. While this is a common technique for designing catalyst supports, most supports are rigid ceramics, whereas graphene is flexible.39 Examples of metal nanoislands for liquid-phase catalyst applications includes the use of silver, platinum, palladium, and gold nanoislands supported on graphene for the catalysis of redox reactions (Figure 3c).5 Examples of catalysis applications include the use of graphene-supported platinum nanoislands for carbon monoxide conversion and liquid-phase high temperature catalysis (Figure 3d).40 Catalytic applications of graphene composites, in particular, are described in detail by many recent reviews.41,42,43
Mechanical Sensing
Metallic nanoislands on graphene exhibit an exceptional degree of piezoresistance—a change in electrical resistance with mechanical strain. Graphene44,45,46 and metal47 are both intrinsically piezoresistive. For metals, this effect is predominately geometrical; there is a negligible change in the resistivity with strain. For graphene, however, mechanical strain also induces a significant increase in the resistivity. This effect has been shown to result from a reduction in the electron mobility with strain.48 When metallic nanoislands are deposited by vapor deposition on graphene, the graphene acts as a conductive, stretchable, flexible and strengthening support.49,50 Under small strains (less than approximately 1%), the conductivity is mediated, in part, by the tunneling of electrons across gaps between the metal nanoparticles. In principle, this modality permits a high degree of piezoresistance because tunneling current is exponentially dependent on the distance between the nanoislands.51 Recently, our group investigated the piezoresistance of gold and palladium nanoislands on graphene. Gauge factors, defined as the ratio of the relative change in electrical resistance to the mechanical strain, were measured to be over 100 in the small strain regime. This sensitivity is an order of magnitude better than conventional thin-film metal strain gauges. The reproducible dynamic behavior also spanned a wide range (0.001–9% strain), a useful trait for strain sensors. Usually, strain sensors excel in sensitivity but are limited in dynamic range or vice-versa. Moreover, gold nanoislands have proven to be compatible with biological cells, such as mammalian cardiomyocytes (Figure 4a). The increased sensitivity by electron-tunneling in gold nanoisland substrates permits the detection of microscale deformations induced by the contractions of these cells (Figure 4b).6 Additionally, larger strains are detectable (>1%) owing to the stretchable, underlying graphene which permits sensing of larger-scale deformations such as the pulse in the radial artery for wearable physiological sensors using gold nanoislands (Figure 4c). Finally, silver nanoisland-graphene composites have been used for other wearable applications, including speech detection (Figure 4d) and bending of fingers (Figure 4e).52
In all the examples discussed, detection of mechanical deformation relies on a piezoresistive effect. However, if the thermal coefficient of resistance (TCR) is large, then temperature fluctuations will also cause changes in the resistivity that are comparable to the changes due to strain (i.e., thermal drift).53 Noting that the TCR of metals is positive and that of graphene is negative, we reasoned that it should be possible to tune the amount of metal to achieve a near-zero TCR. Using this strategy, we were able to minimize thermal drift in metal nanoisland-graphene composites by controlling the surface coverage of metal in the composite (Figure 4f).54 This design strategy enabled the fabrication of a wearable sensor that exhibited stability against abrupt and large temperature fluctuations such as exposure to simulated sunlight (Figure 4g). Critically, this strategy used control of the materials—as opposed to backend electronics—to stabilize the signal.
Energy Transport and Storage
A wide variety of metals have been explored in metal nanoisland-graphene composites for fuel cell applications.2,55,56,57,58,59,60,61 This topic has been reviewed in detail by Liu and coworkers.62 Additionally, other two-dimensional materials, such as tungsten disulfide and molybdenum disulfide, have been used for hydrogen evolution in fuel cells.63 Metal nanoparticles on graphene have also been used as co-catalysts for hydrogen evolution by photocatalytic water splitting, while maintaining charge carriers separated for the generation of energy.64,65 In all these cases, graphene acts as a functional material and a flexible substrate. The choice of metal can significantly improve the efficiency of fuel cells.66 Other applications in energy conversion include the use of symmetric patterns of gold on graphene for the generation of photocurrent by Halas and others.3,27,67,68,69,70,71 In these applications, the gold is used to enhance light absorption by localized surface plasmon resonance, and hot carriers are shuttled into the underlying graphene which generates a photocurrent. Radial symmetry of the gold structures is crucial in this application, as it mitigates phonon scattering, which impedes electron transport. In work by Fang et al., polarization dependent photocurrent was demonstrated using dimer and heptamer gold structures on graphene (Figure 5a, b). Similar work exploiting surface plasmon resonance was demonstrated by Etchermeyer and coworkers who showed significant polarization-dependent enhancement of photocurrent with simple patterns of gold lines (Figure 5c, d).69 Radially symmetric structures, such as gold bowtie antennas fabricated by nanosphere lithography fabricated by Chen and coworkers,67 have been used to enhance light absorption in the NIR and enhanced photoresponse (Figure 5e, f). The strong wavelength dependence of surface plasmon resonance on geometry allows researchers to adjust parameters lithographically, such as the spacing of nanodisks by Liu and coworkers (Figure 5g), and subsequently control the wavelength of light absorbed (Figure 5h).3 Nam and coworkers have exploited buckling as a method to tune the dispersion and sensitivity of nanoisland-graphene photodetectors.72 In all of these cases, the graphene plays a crucial role in electronic transport while the metal nanostructures aid in enhancing light absorption and subsequent generation of photocarriers.
Optical Applications
For metallic nanoislands on graphene in optical applications, the role of graphene has varied from substrate to functional material. For example, Fang and coworkers have used precisely patterned gold nanostructures on graphene (Figure 6a) for optically doped p-n junctions, where the spacing of particles determines both the wavelength of light absorbed and nature of the photocarrier injected into the underlying graphene.26 The result is a composite material that exhibits semiconducting behavior that can be modulated by the wavelength of illuminating light (Figure 6b). Interestingly, the graphene assumes a role of semiconductor and substrate, analogous to silicon in traditional p-n junctions. Metasurfaces comprising patterned gold resonators on graphene have also been used as gate-tunable, reflective phase modulators for mid-infrared beam steering.73 Another optical application that has seen considerable attention is the use of metal nanoisland-graphene composites as substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS).6,74,75,25,76,77,78 The role of graphene in the majority of these applications is as a substrate, allowing easy transfer onto arbitrary substrates for specific applications such as optical strain sensing using SERS (Figure 6c, d).7 Additionally, it has been shown that graphene can also mitigate the effects of fluorescence in SERS signal-to-noise ratios. In recent work, the role of graphene has been expanded by exploiting its electrical conductivity to actuate musculoskeletal cells (Figure 6e, f). This approach permitted the simultaneous electrical stimulation and optical detection (Figure 6g) of musculoskeletal contractions, providing orthogonal modes of interrogation and sensing.
Conclusions
This minireview has discussed a versatile class of composite material comprising metallic nanoislands on graphene. While made of conductive components, the nanoscale arrangement of disconnected nanoislands on a graphene surface gives rise to properties that can be modulated in ways reminiscent of semiconductors. The unique properties of this composite material have led to a wide variety of applications. Applications in chemistry include the use of metal nanoisland-graphene composites for thin-film catalysts with remarkable efficiency. Applications in mechanical sensing include the use of nanoislands for wearable sensors for gesture recognition and cardiac health monitoring. Applications in biological sensing include the use of both optical (piezoplasmonic) and electronic (piezoresistive) modalities for the detection of cellular activity such as mammalian cardiomyocyte and stimulated-myoblast contractions. Both optical and electronic modalities have demonstrated high gauge factors in this area of cellular strain sensing. The field of energy storage and energy transport has employed nanoislands as a catalyst for conversion in fuel cells and highly efficient photodetectors. In summary, the range of application for this simple, two-component metamaterial is extensive. Future work will most likely broaden it even further, as various methods of fabrication make this metamaterial easily attainable. From a materials development perspective, there is a tremendous amount of work left to be done to understand the fundamentals behind the optical, electronic, and mechanical properties that result from a physicochemical interface between graphene and metal nanoislands. A clearer understanding of new properties may be accomplished by first-principle electromagnetic or mechanical simulations of graphene-metal composites. A fundamental understanding of the origin, limits, and utility of these emergent properties will lead to effective engineering of metal nanoisland-graphene composites in the future.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Director’s New Innovator Award, grant 1DP2EB022358-01 and by a Diversity Supplement (for B. C. M.) under the same award number.
References
- 1.Choi SM, Jhi SH, Son YW. Nano Lett. 2010;10:3486–3489. doi: 10.1021/nl101617x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xu C, Wang X, Zhu J. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:19841–19845. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu Y, Cheng R, Liao L, Zhou H, Bai J, Liu G, Liu L, Huang Y, Duan X. Nat Commun. 2011;2:579. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kang P, Wang MC, Knapp PM, Nam SW. Adv Mater. 2016;28:4565. doi: 10.1002/adma.201600482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.He H, Gao C. Sci China Chem. 2011;54:397–404. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zaretski AV, Root SE, Savchenko A, Molokanova E, Printz AD, Jibril L, Arya G, Mercola M, Lipomi DJ. Nano Lett. 2016;16:1375–1380. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marin BC, Liu J, Aklile E, Urbina AD, Chiang AS, Lawrence N, Chen S, Lipomi DJ. Nanoscale. 2016;9:1292–1298. doi: 10.1039/c6nr09005b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kamat PV. J Phys Chem Lett. 2010;1:520–527. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, Hobza P, Zboril R, Kim KS. Chem Rev. 2012;112:6156–6214. doi: 10.1021/cr3000412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Reina A, Son H, Jiao L, Fan B, Dresselhaus MS, Liu Z, Kong J. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:17741–17744. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bae S, Kim H, Lee Y, Xu X, Park J-S, Zheng Y, Balakrishnan J, Lei T, Ri Kim H, Il Song Y, Kim Y-J, Kim KS, Özyilmaz B, Ahn J-H, Hong BH, Iijima S. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5:574–578. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reina A, Jia X, Ho J, Nezich D, Son H, Bulovic V, Dresselhaus MS, Kong J, Kim KSKS, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee SY, Kim JM, Ahn JH, Kim P, Choi JY, Hong BH. Nano Lett. 2009;9:30–35. doi: 10.1021/nl801827v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Arco LG, Zhang Y, Schlenker C. ACS Nano. 2010;4:2865–2873. doi: 10.1021/nn901587x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hong W, Bai H, Xu Y, Yao Z, Gu Z, Shi G. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:1822–1826. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shin DH, Lee JS, Jun J, An JH, Kim SG, Cho KH, Jang J. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–11. doi: 10.1038/srep12294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou X, Huang X, Qi X, Wu S, Xue C, Boey FYC, Yan Q, Chen P, Zhang H. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:10842–10846. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen X, Wu G, Chen J, Chen X, Xie Z, Wang X. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:3693–3695. doi: 10.1021/ja110313d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wan YC, Teoh HF, Tok ES, Sow CH. J Appl Phys. doi: 10.1063/1.4906043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Muszynski R, Seger B, Kamat PV. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112:5263–5266. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee JW, Hall AS, Kim JD, Mallouk TE. Chem Mater. 2012;24:1158–1164. [Google Scholar]
- 21.An X, Yu JC, Wang Y, Hu Y, Yu X, Zhang G. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:8525. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tsong TT. Prog Surf Sci. 2003;74:69–80. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rafiee J, Mi X, Gullapalli H, Thomas AV, Yavari F, Shi Y, Ajayan PM, Koratkar Na. Nat Mater. 2012;11:217–222. doi: 10.1038/nmat3228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chae S, Jang S, Choi WJ, Kim YS, Chang H, Il Lee T, Lee J-O. Nano Lett. 2017 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04989. DOI:acs.nanolett.6b04989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xiang Q, Zhu X, Chen Y, Duan H. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:75201. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/7/075201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fang Z, Wang Y, Liu Z, Schlather A, Ajayan PM, Koppens FHL, Nordlander P, Halas NJ. ACS Nano. 2012;6:10222–10228. doi: 10.1021/nn304028b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fang Z, Liu Z, Wang Y, Ajayan PM, Nordlander P, Halas NJ. Nano Lett. 2012;12:3808–3813. doi: 10.1021/nl301774e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ghosh SK, Pal T. Chem Rev. 2007;107:4797–4862. doi: 10.1021/cr0680282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fromm DP, Sundaramurthy A, James Schuck P, Kino G, Moerner WE. Nano Lett. 2004;4:957–961. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Scholl JA, García-Etxarri A, Koh AL, Dionne JA. Nano Lett. 2013;13:564–569. doi: 10.1021/nl304078v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Laughlin RB. Phys Rev B. 1981;23:5632–5633. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yi J, Kim SH, Lee WW, Kwon SS, Nam SW, Il Park W. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2015;48:475103. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wu W, Liu Z, Jauregui LA, Yu Q, Pillai R, Cao H, Bao J, Chen YP, Pei SS. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2010;150:296–300. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yi J, Lee JM, Il Park W. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2011;155:264–269. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chung MG, Kim DH, Seo DK, Kim T, Im HU, Lee HM, Yoo JB, Hong SH, Kang TJ, Kim YH. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2012;169:387–392. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhangyuan Zhanga JL, Zoua Xuming, Xua Lei, Liao*a Lei, Liua Wei, Hob Johnny, Xiao*a Xiangheng, Jianga Changzhong. Nanoscale. 2010;4:1166–1169. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Navalon S, Dhakshinamoorthy A, Alvaro M, Garcia H. Coord Chem Rev. 2016;312:99–148. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hang L, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Liu G, Cai W, Li Y, Qu L. Acta Mater. 2016;105:59–67. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Julkapli NM, Bagheri S. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40:948–979. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shang L, Bian T, Zhang B, Zhang D, Wu LZ, Tung CH, Yin Y, Zhang T. Angew Chemie - Int Ed. 2014;53:250–254. doi: 10.1002/anie.201306863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huang C, Li C, Shi G. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5:8848. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu Y, Dong X, Chen P. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2283–2307. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15270j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhou X, Qiao J, Yang L, Zhang J. Adv Energy Mater. 2014;4:1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yan C, Wang J, Kang W, Cui M, Wang X, Foo CY, Chee KJ, Lee PS. Adv Mater. 2014;26:2022–2027. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kumar M, Bhaskaran H. Nano Lett. 2015;15:2562–2567. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tsui M, Islam MF. Nanoscale. 2016:1128–1135. doi: 10.1039/c6nr07432d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li M, Tang HX, Roukes ML. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:114–20. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2006.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Smith AD, Niklaus F, Paussa A, Vaziri S, Fischer AC, Sterner M, Forsberg F, Delin A, Esseni D, Palestri P, Östling M, Lemme MC. Nano Lett. 2013;13:3237–3242. doi: 10.1021/nl401352k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Smith AD, Niklaus F, Paussa A, Schroder S, Fischer AC, Sterner M, Wagner S, Vaziri S, Forsberg F, Esseni D, Ostling M, Lemme MC. ACS Nano. 2016;10:9879–9886. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b02533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim Y, Lee J, Yeom MS, Shin JW, Kim H, Cui Y, Kysar JW, Hone J, Jung Y, Jeon S, Han SM. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2114. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yi L, Jiao W, Wu K, Qian L, Yu X, Xia Q, Mao K, Yuan S, Wang S, Jiang Y. Nano Res. 2015;8:2978–2987. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen S, Wei Y, Yuan X, Lin Y, Liu L. J Mater Chem C. 2016;4:4304–4311. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun P, Zhu M, Wang K, Zhong M, Wei J, Wu D, Zhu H. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5:9563–9571. doi: 10.1021/am403186r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Marin BC, Root SE, Urbina AD, Aklile E, Miller R, Zaretski AV, Lipomi DJ. ACS Omega. 2017;2:626–630. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liang Y, Wang H, Zhou J, Li Y, Wang J, Regier T, Dai H. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:3517–3523. doi: 10.1021/ja210924t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Qian Y, Wang C, Le ZG. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;257:10758–10762. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li Y, Gao W, Ci L, Wang C, Ajayan PM. Carbon NY. 2010;48:1124–1130. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liang Y, Li Y, Wang H, Zhou J, Wang J, Regier T, Dai H. Nat Mater. 2011;10:780–786. doi: 10.1038/nmat3087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wu ZS, Sun Y, Tan YZ, Yang S, Feng X, M??llen K. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:19532–19535. doi: 10.1021/ja308676h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang H, Liang Y, Li Y, Dai H. Angew Chemie - Int Ed. 2011;50:10969–10972. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jiang M, He H, Huang C, Liu B, Yi WJ, Chao ZS. Electrochim Acta. 2016;219:492–501. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Liu M, Zhang R, Chen W. Chem Rev. 2014;114:5117–5160. doi: 10.1021/cr400523y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kim J, Byun S, Smith AJ, Yu J, Huang J. J Phys Chem Lett. doi: 10.1021/jz400507t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Singh GP, Shrestha KM, Nepal A, Klabunde KJ, Sorensen CM. Nanotechnology. 2014;25:265701. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/25/26/265701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xie G, Zhang K, Guo B, Liu Q, Fang L, Gong JR. Adv Mater. 2013;25:3820–3839. doi: 10.1002/adma.201301207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dong L, Gari RRS, Li Z, Craig MM, Hou S. Carbon NY. 2010;48:781–787. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chen Z, Li X, Wang J, Tao L, Long M, Liang SJ, Ang LK, Shu C, Tsang HK, Xu JB. ACS Nano. 2017 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b06172. DOI: acsnano.6b06172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Echtermeyer TJ, Milana S, Sassi U, Eiden A, Wu M, Lidorikis E, Ferrari AC. Nano Lett. 2016;16:8–20. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Echtermeyer TJ, Britnell L, Jasnos PK, Lombardo A, Gorbachev RV, Grigorenko AN, Geim AK, Ferrari AC, Novoselov KS. Nat Commun. 2011;2:458. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liu YL, Yu CC, Te Lin K, Yang TC, Wang EY, Chen HL, Chen LC, Chen KH. ACS Nano. 2015;9:5093–5103. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Maiti R, Sinha TK, Mukherjee S, Adhikari B, Ray SK. Plasmonics. 2016;11:1297–1304. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kim M, Kang P, Leem J, Nam S. Nanoscale. 2017:23–27. doi: 10.1039/c6nr09338h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sherrott MC, Hon PWC, Fountaine KT, Garcia JC, Ponti SM, Brar VW, Sweatlock LA, Atwater HA. Nano Lett. 2017 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00359. DOI:acs.nanolett.7b00359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nien LW, Chien MH, Chao BK, Chen MJ, Li JH, Hsueh CH. J Phys Chem C. 2016 acs.jpcc.5b11940. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Leem J, Wang MC, Kang P, Nam S. Nano Lett. 2015;15:7684–7690. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Khalil I, Julkapli NM, Yehye WA, Basirun WJ, Bhargava SK. Materials (Basel) doi: 10.3390/ma9060406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hu W, Huang Z, Zhou Y, Cai W, Kang J. Sci China Physics, Mech Astron. 2014;57:2021–2023. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yang C, Zhang C, Huo Y, Jiang S, Qiu H, Xu Y, Li X, Man B. Carbon NY. 2016;98:526–533. [Google Scholar]