Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 11;8(62):105692–105702. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22389

Table 2. Comparison between diastolic and systolic function of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle in rats in each group.

Group Number (n) Systolic function (%) Diastolic function (%)
Normal 12 8.07 ± 2.52 40.51 ± 3.24
Blank 9 26.99 ± 2.82* 21.13 ± 2.11*
NC 10 27.99 ± 2.22* 20.96 ± 2.05*
TrkA 11 19.07 ± 2.21*# 27.93 ± 2.91*#
TrkA+NGF 10 15.74 ± 2.32*#& 35.57 ± 2.53*#&

Note: NC: negative control. *P < 0.05, compared with the normal group; #P < 0.05, compared with the blank group; &P < 0.05, compared with the TrkA group.