Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2017 Oct 8;9(1):10.1002/wrna.1454. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1454

Cyclic-di-GMP regulation of virulence in bacterial pathogens

Cherisse L Hall 1, Vincent T Lee 1,
PMCID: PMC5739959  NIHMSID: NIHMS906168  PMID: 28990312

Abstract

Signaling pathways allow bacteria to adapt to changing environments. For pathogenic bacteria, signaling pathways allow for timely expression of virulence factors and the repression of anti-virulence factors within the mammalian host. As the bacteria exit the mammalian host, signaling pathways enable expression of factors promoting survival in the environment and/or non-mammalian hosts. One such signaling pathway uses the dinucleotide cyclic-di-GMP (c-di-GMP), and many bacterial genomes encode numerous proteins that are responsible for synthesizing and degrading c-di-GMP. Once made, c-di-GMP binds to individual protein and RNA receptors to allosterically alter the macromolecule function to drive phenotypic changes. Each bacterial genome encodes unique sets of genes for c-di-GMP signaling and virulence factors so the regulation by c-di-GMP is organism specific. Recent works have pointed to evidence that c-di-GMP regulates virulence in different bacterial pathogens of mammalian hosts. In this review, we discuss the criteria for determining the contribution of signaling nucleotides to pathogenesis using a well-characterized signaling nucleotide, cyclic AMP (cAMP), in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using these criteria, we review the roles of c-di-GMP in mediating virulence and highlight common themes that exist among eight diverse pathogens that cause different diseases through different routes of infection and transmission.

Introduction

Bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) is a widely utilized signaling pathway that regulates bacterial adaptation to different environments.1 C-di-GMP is synthesized from two GTP by diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) that contain a GGDEF domain and degraded into pGpG by phosphodiesterases (PDE-As) that contain EAL or HD-GYP domain. Signaling by c-di-GMP is completed when pGpG is degraded further to GMP by oligoribonuclease and related RNA degradation enzymes.2-4 Thus, c-di-GMP represents one of the shortest signaling ribonucleotides. In addition, a number of genes can encode proteins with both GGDEF and EAL domains (GGDEF-EAL) indicating that levels of c-di-GMP in the cell are regulated by a complicated number of synthetic and degradative enzymes. Once made, c-di-GMP binds a diverse set of protein receptors and RNA riboswitches.1 C-di-GMP binding to molecular receptors allosterically alter their function and downstream cellular phenotypes.5 Genes encoding c-di-GMP signaling components are found in a large number of bacterial pathogens. This review seeks to cover the contribution of c-di-GMP signaling to bacterial pathogenesis for a number of different pathogens to identify common themes. For this review, virulence and pathogenesis is considered as the ability of the bacteria to replicate and cause disease symptoms in the mammalian host. Due to space limitation, for each pathogen, we have referenced reviews that cover their virulence factors and their c-di-GMP signaling pathway throughout the text. In order to understand how c-di-GMP contributes to pathogenesis, we adapted the principles of molecular Koch’s postulates6 for signaling nucleotides. For signaling nucleotides to contribute to pathogenesis they should meet the following criteria: 1. the nucleotide should be made during infection, 2. the receptor of the signaling nucleotide should be required for infection, and 3. the process regulated by the signaling nucleotide should be required for infection. Each of these criteria can be assessed experimentally using different approaches. To understand how we assessed c-di-GMP regulation of pathogens using these criteria, first we will briefly describe the role of the well-characterized signaling nucleotide system of cAMP in the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.7

In P. aeruginosa, cAMP signaling pathway controls the expression of hundreds of genes including type three secretion system (T3SS) that is essential for virulence in a murine model of acute pneumonia.8 P. aeruginosa encodes two adenylate cyclases, cyaA and cyaB,8 and one phosphodiesterase, cpdA.9 Once generated, cAMP is bound by the transcription factor Vfr to drive differential expression of more than a hundred genes of which 80% are differentially expressed in the absence of the two cyclases, indicating that cAMP signals through Vfr.8 Of these genes, Vfr-cAMP binds directly upstream of exsA,10 which encodes the transcription factor for T3SS.11 To assess the contribution of cAMP to P. aeruginosa pathogenesis, strains with altered signaling components were tested in the acute pneumonia model. In this model, P. aeruginosa strains that were unable to either synthesize cAMP (∆cyaAcyaB), lacked the receptor (∆vfr) or lacked the regulated genes (∆exsA and ∆pscC, which cannot perform T3SS) had a similar 2-log defect in the colony forming units (CFU) within the lung and a 3-log CFU reduction of bacteria disseminated to the liver and spleen.12 Since all steps of the signaling pathway have a similar virulence defect, based on the criteria adapted from molecular Koch’s postulates, cAMP signaling is required for acute pneumonia by P. aeruginosa. For this review, we applied a similar assessment for c-di-GMP in each of the different pathogens in which c-di-GMP signaling has been studied during mammalian infections. In many pathogens, there can be over 40 genes encoding GGDEF domains and over 30 genes encoding PDE-A domains. This functional redundancy complicates the ability to analyze the contribution of c-di-GMP signaling from the standpoint of controlling the levels of c-di-GMP in the bacterial cell. Nonetheless, a number of different strategies have been used to test the contribution of the c-di-GMP signaling on bacterial pathogenesis.

This review has been divided into three sections to separate the pathogens based on their route of infection/transmission cycle: 1. Healthcare-associated infection pathogens, 2. Gastrointestinal pathogens, and 3. Vector-borne pathogens. These three classes were used in order to consider broadly how pathogens behave inside and outside of mammalian hosts. However, this classification should not be considered as a strict definition as some bacterial pathogens infect through multiple routes of infection.

Healthcare-associated infection pathogens

Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) include central line-associated bloodstream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonias, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) and surgical site infections. One strategy used by HAI pathogens in establishing infections is to form a biofilm on the surfaces of medical devices and subsequently disseminate from the contaminated device into other host tissues to cause systemic infections. HAI pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, have the potential to utilize c-di-GMP since their genomes encode numerous proteins with GGDEF and EAL/HD-GYP domains. For clinical isolates of E. coli and P. aeruginosa, the amount of c-di-GMP has been measured in the laboratory setting, and these levels are elevated when specific DGCs are overexpressed and decreased when specific PDE-As are overexpressed.13 Together, these in vitro studies suggest that all three organisms extensively utilize c-di-GMP as a signaling molecule to regulate bacterial biofilm. Since HAI pathogens cause a number of different infections, the effect of c-di-GMP is discussed for each pathogen, including c-di-GMP receptors and phenotypes that contribute to different infections.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that causes a diverse set of acute and chronic infections. Key virulence factors for acute infections include type II secretion system (T2SS), type III secretion system (T3SS), type IV pili as well as other virulence factors (see review14). Chronic infections caused by P. aeruginosa include the life-long colonization of the lungs of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients15 and infections associated with the use of medical devices.16 A key P. aeruginosa virulence factor for CF patients is alginate,15 a viscous polysaccharide that further occludes the airways, leading to morbidity and mortality. In contrast, infections associated with the use of medical devices often are linked to P. aeruginosa forming a biofilm on the device surface. Biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa is multifactorial and involves a number of extracellular matrix components (see review17).P. aeruginosa extensively utilize c-di-GMP to regulate alginate production, biofilm formation, and motility (see reviews18, 19). P. aeruginosa encodes 16-17 GGDEF domains, 5 EAL domains and 16 GGDEF-EAL domains, and numerous studies have implicated these genes in the regulation of downstream processes.20 For brevity, we are focusing on the c-di-GMP receptors that mediate the response to c-di-GMP. Biosynthesis of alginate is regulated by c-di-GMP binding to the Alg44 receptor, which has a PilZ domain.21 C-di-GMP signaling is required for alginate production as Alg44 mutants that are unable to bind c-di-GMP fail to produce alginate.21 C-di-GMP also regulates biofilm formation through many receptors. P. aeruginosa biofilm formation is transcriptionally regulated by c-di-GMP binding to FleQ receptor which activates transcription of the pel operon, psl operon and the cdrA gene,22-25 while simultaneously repressing flagella genes.26 The Pel and Psl exopolysaccharide and the CdrA surface proteins contribute to the P. aeruginosa extracellular matrix and support biofilm formation. C-di-GMP binds to PelD receptor to activate Pel polysaccharide biosynthesis.27 C-di-GMP is important for biofilm formation as mutations in PelD that are defective for c-di-GMP binding fail to form biofilm.27-29 In addition, several other c-di-GMP receptors have been identified that increase biofilm production, repress flagella motility and repress type IV pili motility. To enhance biofilm formation, c-di-GMP interacts with HapZ, which alters signaling by the SagS histidine kinase;30 WarA, which regulates LPS biosynthesis;31 and BlrR, which is a transcription factor.32 To repress flagella motility, c-di-GMP binds MapZ, which alters CheR1 methyltransferase activity and chemotaxis33 and FlgZ, which interacts with the MotCD stator proteins.34 C-di-GMP represses type IV pili by binding FimX, a degenerate GGDEF-EAL that serves as a receptor protein.35 Together, these studies on P. aeruginosa in the laboratory setting show that c-di-GMP binds to a number of receptors to directly activate alginate biosynthesis and biofilm formation while repressing motility mediated by flagella and type IV pili.To address the contribution of c-di-GMP to chronic P. aeruginosa infections, several studies have analyzed P. aeruginosa strains from sputum samples of CF patients. Isolates from CF sputum are heterogeneous and a subset of these isolates exhibit small colony variant (SCV) phenotype. Using genomic sequencing, several studies have shown that P. aeruginosa strains can accumulate mutations during life-long colonization of lungs of CF patients.36 Sequencing of longitudinal isolates from the lungs of one CF patient identified mutations in the wspF gene, which leads to increased c-di-GMP synthesis by the diguanylate cyclase WspR37, indicating that an increase in c-di-GMP signaling can occur in vivo.36 In addition to c-di-GMP regulating SCV, c-di-GMP binding to the Alg44 receptor is also needed to activate alginate production during mucoid conversion in the CF lung.21 Since P. aeruginosa in the CF lung can develop SCV phenotype and undergo mucoid conversion, c-di-GMP is implicated in CF infections. Nonetheless, direct evidence that c-di-GMP contributes to CF infection is lacking due to the current limitation in the animal models for CF.38, 39 Future studies using animal models that better reflect airway infections in CF is needed.

Another type of study determining the contribution of c-di-GMP signaling to chronic infection utilized animal models of medical device infections that typically involve biofilm formation. The experimental designs of these studies have two challenges in genetic redundancy. First is the large number of genes encoding DGCs and PDE-As and the redundancy in the generation and degradation of c-di-GMP. Second is that multiple c-di-GMP regulated pathways can up-regulate biofilm production, leading to complications in determining which of the c-di-GMP-regulated processes is driving biofilm formation and infection. A number of studies have assessed c-di-GMP signaling using implanted catheters in mammalian models of infections by employing strains that were genetically altered to either overproduce or reduce the cellular levels of c-di-GMP. In one study, an yfiR mutant was identified with SCV phenotype. Further studies revealed that YfiR is a negative regulator of the YfiN DGC.40 Thus, mutants in yfiR have elevated c-di-GMP levels and are phenotypically SCVs with slower growth rates.40 When infecting mice using a subcutaneous catheter model, the yfiR mutant had a 1-log reduction in CFUs in the subcutaneous catheter and in the surrounding tissue as compared with the parental PAO1 strain at 4-weeks post-infection.40 At 8-weeks post-infection, the difference between wild type and yfiR mutant was decreased to statistically not significant. When co-infected in a competition experiment, the yfiR mutant was 8-fold outcompeted by PAO1 at 4 weeks. By 8 weeks, the difference was diminished as the number of PAO1 CFU was reduced to numbers similiar to the yfiR mutant. In another study, PAO1 with a vector control or a vector expressing the yhjH PDE-A from E. coli were grown as a biofilm on silicone catheters which were then implanted in the peritoneum of mice.41 Outside the animal, expression of yhjH in PAO1 reduced c-di-GMP levels in the cell, which led to a reduction in biofilm formation and an increase in dispersal from pre-formed biofilm. When the silicone catheter with preformed biofilm was implanted in the peritoneum, implants with strains expressing yhjH heterologously had a 1-log reduction in CFU associated with the catheter and concomitantly increased CFU in the intraperitoneal cavity by 1.5-log.41 These results indicate that lower levels of c-di-GMP led P. aeruginosa to disseminate from the biofilm on catheter surface. When determining whether expression of yhjH had an effect on bacterial colonization of the implanted catheter over time, the authors found that the two different experimental groups showed different levels of clearance of the bacteria from the catheter, indicating that in vivo experiments are more variable than studies in laboratory conditions.41 A third model of catheter infections used a mice model of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI).42 One part of the study utilized overexpression of two DGCs (wspR and PA1107) and two PDE-As (PA2133 and rocR). Expression of the DGCs increased the number of CFU in the bladder and the number of CFU in kidney. In contrast, overexpression of the PDE-As reduced the number of CFU the bladder and the number of CFU in the kidney.42 These results suggest that elevated c-di-GMP levels enhance biofilm formation on the urinary catheter and increased the likelihood of the bacteria to disseminate to the kidneys. To determine which of the DGC/PDE-A is important for CAUTI, a library of in-frame deletion mutants of PA14 was used43 to assess the contribution of c-di-GMP during CAUTI. From the analysis of 24 mutants, only two genes encoding GGDEF-EAL domains, morA and PA14_07500, had 1-log reduction in CFU within the bladder indicating a defect in colonization. The subtle effects of in-frame deletion mutants suggest that the signaling redundancy of c-di-GMP may mask any single DGC/PDE-A mutation. Together, these results indicate c-di-GMP signaling enhances the attachment of bacteria to catheters placed in different anatomical locations. However, this enhancement in colonization is about 1-log and can vary for different groups of infected animals.

Two other chronic infection models used to study chronic P. aeruginosa pathogenesis are chinchilla model of otitis media and an agar bead model of lung infection in rats. For the chinchilla model of otitis media, P. aeruginosa is applied to the middle ear of the animal through a transbullar injection.44 Infection with P. aeruginosa strain MJK8, a strain with a 22 amino acid deletion mutation in the wspA gene that results in elevated levels of c-di-GMP37 was able to persist for a longer amount of time in the chinchilla bulla and caused less morbidity as compared to the parental PAO1 strain.44 Additional experiments with the MJK8 ∆psl and MJK8 ∆pel strains did not show a significant difference in the infection from the MJK8 strain.44 There are two possible explanations for these results. One explanation is that these polysaccharides can act in a redundant manner to mediate their effects in the host. A second explanation is that a different c-di-GMP regulated process is acting in the host to promote biofilm and reduce acute virulence. Together, this study shows that elevated c-di-GMP levels reduce acute virulence and enhance persistence in the otitis media model of infection. Another model of chronic infection was the instillation of agar beads embedded with P. aeruginosa into the lungs of rats.45 A signature-tagged mutagenesis (STM) study revealed a number of genes required for chronic colonization including genes that are involved in type IV pili and alginate biosynthesis among many other functions.45 Of the 148 ORFs that showed defects in this infection model, only one encoded a gene, PA4929, that is involved in c-di-GMP signaling.45 The lack of overlap between genes involved in c-di-GMP and the STM mutants may indicate functional redundancy of DGCs, PDE-As and receptor proteins.The contribution of c-di-GMP signaling to P. aeruginosa infections can be assessed using the criteria of molecular Koch’s postulates adapted for signaling nucleotides and assessed for each type of infection. For P. aeruginosa lung infection in CF patients, there is indirect evidence that strongly indicates the involvement of c-di-GMP in SCV formation and alginate production. However, the ability to directly assess the contribution of the c-di-GMP regulated process for infection requires future development of an appropriate CF animal model. For other infection models, the evidence for c-di-GMP contribution to infection is less clear. In general, there is a positive correlation between c-di-GMP signaling and virulence. Typically, increased c-di-GMP levels are correlated with an enhanced ability of P. aeruginosa to persist as biofilms on foreign objects or in the bulla of chinchilla, while decreased c-di-GMP levels are correlated with the reduction of P. aeruginosa on foreign objects. One possible reason for the enhancement of biofilm formation in vivo is the production of the PSL polysaccharide which can protect the bacteria from host immune recognition.46 While these observations generally support the idea that c-di-GMP contributes to these chronic infections, future studies are required to determine the levels of c-di-GMP in the bacteria during infection, to elucidate the processes and pathways regulated by c-di-GMP and to assess contribution of c-di-GMP regulated pathways to chronic infections.

Escherichia coli

E. coli causes numerous types of infection including gastroenteritis, urinary tract infections, meningitis and many others (see reviews 47, 48). E. coli utilizes a number of virulence factors to cause infections including enterotoxins, T3SS effectors and adhesins. The ability of E. coli to cause diverse infections is in part due to the plasticity of the genome, which consists of 2,200 core genes and thousands of accessory genes for each distinct pathotype.49, 50 In a sequencing study of 61 pathogenic and commensal E. coli strains 2 GGDEF domains, 4 EAL domains, and 2 GGDEF-EAL domains were found in the core genome.51This is a small subset of the total number of genes encoding GGDEF/EAL domains in the pangenome. From the same sequencing study, c-di-GMP receptors including BcsA,52 BscE,53 YcgR54, 55 are found in most strains. Exceptions include some enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) strains that have insertion sequence in ycgR, several extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) strains that have frameshift mutations in bcsA, and some enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) strains that have various mutations leading to a truncated BcsE protein.51 C-di-GMP signaling in E. coli has been extensively studied in K-12 strain that is non-pathogenic (see review56). High levels of c-di-GMP activate the production of matrix components, including cellulose, poly-N-acetyl glucosamine (PNAG) and curli, and repress flagella motility.56 C-di-GMP binds the PilZ domain of BcsA to activate cellulose biosynthesis.57, 58 C-di-GMP binds the complex consisting of PgaC and PgaD to activate productin of PNAG.59 C-di-GMP bound YcgR inhibits motility by interacting with the flagella machinery.54, 55 C-di-GMP also activates CsgD to increase expression of curli60, 61 by a yet to described mechanism.

Since E. coli causes numerous distinct infections, the contribution of c-di-GMP has been tested through studies using different bacterial strains on mammalian cells or animal models of infection. For UPEC, a mutation in yfiR leads to constitutive activity of the YfiN DGC,62 in a manner similar to P. aeruginosa. Using a murine model of urinary tract infection (UTI), a uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) clinical isolate CFT073 with the ∆yfiR mutation was outcompeted by the parental strain by 1-log in the bladder and kidneys, whereas the ∆yfiN mutant performed as well the parental strain, indicating that the YfiN DGC is not required for UTI.62 Interestingly, the virulence defect of the ∆yfiR strain is eliminated when yfiN is also deleted. The virulence defect associated with elevated c-di-GMP is due to increased cellulose and curli, as a ∆yfiRcsgDbcsA triple mutant competes equally with the parental strain.62 These results indicate that c-di-GMP enhances the production of cellulose and curli, which act as anti-virulence factors for UTI. One other study investigated the contribution of c-di-GMP for adhesion to bladder epithelial cells using CFT073 strain with deletion of individual DGC, PDE, and DGC-PDE genes.63 The results indicated mutants lacking a subset of genes encoding GGDEF/EAL domains have increased adherence, while mutants in a different subset of genes encoding GGDEF/EAL domains have decreased adherence. Future studies to determine the c-di-GMP levels in the mutants and determining their ability to cause UTI in a mammalian model would reveal which of these genes are active in a mammalian host.

In addition, studies of non-UPEC strains have investigated the contribution of c-di-GMP signaling to pathogenesis. For ETEC, attachment of bacteria to Caco-2 intestinal epithileal cells led to an increased expression of GGDEF domain proteins and bcs operon, indicating binding to host cells triggers c-di-GMP synthesis.64 Additional studies are required to determine if c-di-GMP levels are increased in response to attachment and whether the bcs operon contributes to attachment and infection. For EHEC strain O157:H7, expression of the BlrP PDE-A from K. pneumoniae was able to reduce cellular c-di-GMP levels, expression of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) T3SS, and attachment to HT-29 human colon epithelial cells.65 Future studies can determine which c-di-GMP receptor is responsible for regulating the LEE locus and attachment to host cells. For EAEC, genomic sequencing revealed the presence of two genes encoding GGDEF domain (dgx and yneF) not found in non-pathogenic K-12 strains.66 Interestingly, all of the clinical strains have lower levels of cellulose at 37 °C.66 Future studies can test if these additional genes contribute to c-di-GMP signaling and virulence.

Assessing the contribution of c-di-GMP to E. coli infection using the criteria of adapted molecular Koch’s postulate is complicated by the limited number of studies using the same model to test more than one aspect of the requirement for c-di-GMP signaling during infection. Of these studies on diverse pathogenic E. coli, the studies of the UPEC strain CFT073 is the most well characterized. Increased c-di-GMP signaling reduced the competitive index by 1-log in a murine UTI model. This defect was reversed when the c-di-GMP regulated processes, curli and cellulose, are genetically deleted. Together with the ability of the DGC mutant to compete as well as the parental strain, these results indicate that c-di-GMP, cellulose and curli are anti-virulence factors for UTI caused by CFT073. Future studies to determine the concentration of c-di-GMP during infection and which of the known c-di-GMP regulated processes are responsible for other infections caused by E. coli would elucidate the function of the signaling pathway for this important pathogen.

Klebsiella pneumoniae

K. pneumoniae is one of the leading HAI pathogens that form biofilms on the surfaces of medical devices and healthcare facilities.16 As an opportunistic pathogen, Klebsiella utilizes a number of different virulence factors to establish infections. Numerous genetic experiments in different infection models have revealed a number of different virulence genes including capsule, LPS, fimbriae and surface adhesins (see review67). K. pneumoniae extensively utilizes c-di-GMP signaling, as genome sequencing of 3 strains revealed that there are 12-15 genes encoding proteins with GGDEF domain, 10-15 genes encoding proteins with EAL domain, and 5-6 genes encoding genes encoding proteins with GGDEF-EAL domains.68 Of the many virulence factors in K. pneumoniae, mannose-resistant Klebsiella-like (Mrk) hemagglutinin is the only one known to be regulated by c-di-GMP. In a signature-tagged mutagenesis screen for mutants defective for liver abscess from an oral route of infection, a transposon insertion in the mrkC gene was avirulent and does not disseminate from the GI tract.69 mrkC is a part of the mrkABCDF operon which encodes the Mrk,70, 71 that forms the type 3 fimbriae that allows attachment to abiotic surfaces and biofilm formation.72

In a separate screen for mutants defective in biofilm formation under laboratory conditions, mutants in mrkABCDF operon and the adjacent mrkHIJ operon were identified.73 The mrkHIJ operon encodes for a PilZ-domain protein (MrkH), a LuxR family transcription factor (MrkI), and a PDE-A (MrkJ).73, 74 Mutations that ablate in individual genes within the mrk operons, except mrkJ, have reduced export of the major pili MrkA, hemagglutinin activity and biofilm formation. Additional analysis revealed that MrkH binds c-di-GMP via the PilZ domain and is sufficient to promote expression from the mrkA promoter.73, 74,75 In contrast, the mrkJ mutant had enhanced levels of MrkA protein and biofilm formation.73, 76 Since mrkJ encodes a PDE-A, the mrkJ deletion mutant have elevated levels of c-di-GMP, that binds MrkH to activate type 3 fimbriae expression and biofilm formation. In addition, another PDE-A, YjcC, also reduces c-di-GMP levels, mrkA expression, and biofilm formation in a manner similar to MrkJ.77 Mutants lacking yjcC have a 1-log increase in LD50 for an intraperitoneal infection, indicating that elevated levels of c-di-GMP lead to a defect in a systemic infection.77 Since mrkC is not required for intraperitoneal infection of mice, elevated levels of c-di-GMP may regulate other processes that are detrimental to systemic infection of mammalian hosts.69 K. pneumoniae encodes the cellulose biosynthesis operon, and cellulose may act as an anti-virulence factor.78 These studies show that an opportunistic pathogen such as K. pneumoniae likely utilizes c-di-GMP regulated processes in a subset of infections in which the Mrk type 3 fimbriae promotes infections while other factors may act as anti-virulence factors.

Currently, two independent studies of K. pneumoniae have satisfied one of the criteria of the molecular Koch’s postulates adapted for c-di-GMP signaling in pathogenesis. In the study of dissemination to the liver from a GI infection, strains with mutations in mrkC, which is a c-di-GMP regulated type 3 fimbriae, are defective for dissemination from the intestines. In a different model of intraperitoneal infection, a yjcC mutant which has elevated c-di-GMP exhibited an increased LD50. Future work is required to determine whether c-di-GMP is made during infection and which c-di-GMP receptor and c-di-GMP-regulated processes are required for various types of infections caused by K. pneumoniae.

Summary of HAI pathogens

The contribution of c-di-GMP signaling to these three HAI pathogens is specific to each pathogen and each type of infection. For P. aerguinosa, c-di-GMP signaling is required for alginate production and SCV phenotype providing evidence that c-di-GMP is utilized during life-long lung infections of CF patients. For other chronic infections, c-di-GMP signaling also contributes to P. aeruginosa infections although additional studies are required to elucidate the receptors and regulated processes involved in each infection. In contrast, c-di-GMP signaling attenuates E. coli virulence during UTIs. This defect can be reversed when the curli and cellulose are genetically removed indicating that c-di-GMP activation of curli and cellulose interferes with the infection process. The effect of c-di-GMP regulated process on infection is likely due to the specific molecule that is produced. Many of the c-di-GMP regulated processes include production of extracellular proteins and polysaccharides. Some of these polymers such as cellulose and curli in E. coli may be recognized by the mammalian immune system, thus providing a basis for the apparent anti-virulence property of c-di-GMP signaling. In contrast, c-di-GMP regulated extracellular proteins and polysaccharides of P. aeruginosa are different in protein sequence and sugar composition. These differences may distinguish which pathogens utilize c-di-GMP signaling to promote infections in mammalian hosts.

Gastrointestinal pathogens

Vibrio cholerae

V. cholerae, the causative agent of cholera, is responsible for seven documented worldwide pandemics.79 V. cholerae infections start with the ingestion of contaminated water and food. Upon ingestion, the bacteria moves though the gastrointestinal tract and the mucosal layer (see review80). Biofilm formation by V. cholerae enhances survival at low pH81 and allows the bacteria to enter the small intestines where cholera toxin and the toxin-coregulated pili (Tcp) are expressed. Cholera toxin binds GM1 glangiosides on intestinal epithelial cells82, moves to the endoplasmic reticulum by retrograde transport and enters the cytoplasm through retrotranslocation from the endoplasmic reticulum.83 In the cytoplasm, cholera toxin ADP-ribosylates Gsα subunit of adenylate cyclase thereby activating the production of cAMP.84, 85 cAMP activates protein kinase A to phosphorylate the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)86 chloride channel, leading to export of chloride and carbonate ions and water loss. Intoxication of the intestinal epithelial cells leads to rapid fluid accumulation in the intestinal lumen leading to rice water diarrhea. In addition to cholera toxin, V. cholerae use Tcp to attach and colonize the small intestine. As V. cholerae exits the host, expression of cholera toxin and Tcp is repressed while genes involved in biofilm production are up-regulated.81, 87

V. cholerae extensively utilizes c-di-GMP signaling to regulate biofilm formation (please see review88). The V. cholerae genome contains 31 genes encoding GGDEF domains, 12 EAL domains, 9 HD-GYP domains and 10 GGDEF-EAL domains.88 In addition to enzymes that synthesize and degrade c-di-GMP, V. cholerae encodes numerous c-di-GMP binding proteins, including PilZ domain containing proteins such as PlzC, PlzD and PlzE89, 90 and transcription factors – VpsT,91 VpsR,92 and FlrA,93 and MshE, which is the export ATPase of the mannose sensitive hemagglutinin (MSHA).94, 95 Elevated levels of c-di-GMP trigger a transcriptional response that includes increased expression of the Vibrio polysaccharide (vps) and msh operons and the repression of flagellar genes.96 Vps polysaccharide and MSHA both promote biofilm formation.97 In addition to promoting interactions between bacteria, MSHA also allows V. cholerae to bind to chitin, which is the primary component of exoskeleton of crustaceans in marine estuaries and allows the bacteria to have a reservoir outside the host.98, 99 Furthermore, V. cholerae in the biofilm state is more tolerant to hypotonic stress in fresh water environments100 as well as low pH81 and surfactant101 stresses that mimic the mammalian upper GI tract. Together, c-di-GMP drives biofilm formation that promotes bacterial survival outside the mammalian host and the mammalian upper GI tract.

A key question is whether or not c-di-GMP promotes V. cholerae virulence inside the mammalian host. Several lines of evidence indicate that c-di-GMP levels are decreased in the small intestines. A study for down-regulated genes in the infant mouse model revealed that the entire msh operon and the DGC VC2224 were down-regulated in the intestines.102 Studies using recombination-based in vivo expression technology (RIVET) to detect expression of genes by V. cholerae during infection showed that ctx and tcpA were highly expressed early in infection, whereas msh operon and DGCs (VC0130, VC0956, VC1593 and VC2697) were expressed late in infection.103 These studies indicate a coordinated down-regulation of DGC and DGC-regulated msh operon upon entry into the host. One reason for reduction of c-di-GMP and down-regulation of c-di-GMP-regulated genes was revealed by studies using V. cholerae that constitutively express MSHA.102 In an infant mouse model, the V. cholerae with the msh operon placed under the constitutive lac promoter had a 1,000-fold decrease in competition with the parental strain only when the infected mice were breast fed by wild-type mothers. This defect was not observed in pups that were fed by IgA-/- mothers because the milks lacks IgA which binds MSHA and opsonizes bacteria expressing MSHA. These results show that IgA is responsible for host immune clearance of MSHA expressing V. cholerae.102 Together these studies indicate that V. cholerae suppresses c-di-GMP-regulated MSHA to evade host IgA and allow for productive infection in the intestinal tract. As the bacteria exits the host, DGCs are expressed, leading to elevated c-di-GMP levels that can drive biofilm formation as the bacteria returns to the environment.103 Another proposed signal for this increased c-di-GMP production is the temperature change from the homeostatic mammalian host to the lower ambient environment.104 The ability of V. cholerae to cause epidemics is attributed to hypervirulence of the bacteria exiting infected hosts.105 This is likely through the ability of bacterial biofilm to better survive the acidic environment as they re-enter the GI tract of the next host. Overall, V. cholerae uses c-di-GMP in the infection cycle, but within the mammalian host, DGCs are repressed and c-di-GMP-regulated MSHA acts as an anti-virulence factor (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

C-di-GMP signaling in gastrointestinal pathogens. Repression of c-di-GMP-regulated extracellular matrix components in the mammalian host prevents host recognition and immune clearance. Activation of c-di-GMP-regulated extracellular matrix components outside the mammalian host allows bacteri to survive environmental stresses and reentry through the low pH of the stomach. Once inside the mammalian intestine, bacteria reduces c-di-GMP levels in order to establish a successful infection. * S. Typhimurium does not encode the pga genes encoding for the biosynthetic genes for producing the PNAG polysaccharide. Heterologous expression of pga genes attenuates virulence of S. Typhimurium.

C-di-GMP signaling in V. cholerae pathogenesis as assessed by the adapted molecular Koch’s postulates for signaling nucleotides indicates that it is an anti-virulence signaling pathway. Genes encoding DGCs are down-regulated in the host upper GI tract and up-regulated later in the infection. C-di-GMP regulated MSHA is recognized by host IgA and serves as an anti-virulence factor. Together, these studies indicate that c-di-GMP is an anti-virulence factor in the mammalian host. However, this does not mean that c-di-GMP signaling does not contribute to V. cholerae transmission and epidemics. C-di-GMP activation of MSHA, and presumably the Vps polysaccharide, promotes biofilm formation that allows the bacteria to survive hypotonic stress in the environment and the acidic pH of the stomachs of subsequent human hosts. The reciprocal regulation of c-di-GMP as the bacteria enters and exits the mammalian host allows the bacteria to survive both host immune stress and environmental stress. Future work to determine the concentration of c-di-GMP in V. cholerae throughout the GI tract during infection will increase our understanding of the contribution of c-di-GMP signaling to V. cholerae pathogenesis.

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

S. eneterica serovar Typhirium is a facultative anaerobic bacterium that causes gastroenteritis (see reviews).106-108 During infection of the gastrointestinal tract, S. Typhimurium utilizes two T3SS systems to interact with the host: T3SS-1 mediates entry of S. Typhimurium into epithelial cells and T3SS-2 allows the bacteria to survive in the phagosome of macrophages. Currently, neither T3SSs have been shown to be regulated by c-di-GMP.

S. Typhimurium regulates c-di-GMP levels using five GGDEF domain containing proteins, seven EAL domain containing proteins, and seven proteins with both GGDEF and EAL domains.109, 110 C-di-GMP signaling increases production of biofilm matrix components including exopolysaccharide cellulose and curli fimbriae and represses flagella motility.111-114 C-di-GMP binds two PilZ domain protein receptors to independently regulate flagella and cellulose. YcgR, binds c-di-GMP and inhibits flagellar rotation.54, 55, 115, 116 BcsA binds c-di-GMP leading to an allosteric shift that no longer occludes the active site of BscB, the cellulose synthase, thereby allowing UDP-glucose to be polymerized into cellulose.58 In addition to these PilZ domain receptors, c-di-GMP activates transcription of csgD through a yet to be identified receptor.117, 118 CsgD is a Lux-family transcriptional regulator that positively regulates expression of the diguanylate cyclase adrA and the cgsABC operon that encodes the curli fimbraie.56, 111 In turn, AdrA generates c-di-GMP to drive cellulose production. In summary, c-di-GMP enhances biofilm formation by activating cellulose and curli while simultaneously down-regulating flagella motility.

The contribution of c-di-GMP signaling on pathogenesis has been tested in several animal models of infection. In one study, overexpression of AdrA from an ectopic plasmid decreased cell surface attachment on gastrointestinal epithelial HT-29 cells and decreased virulence in a mouse ligated ileal loop infection.119 The defect caused by elevated levels of c-di-GMP is reversed in part by deletion of the bcsA and csgD genes.119 In another study based on intravenous mouse infection, a cgdR PDE-A mutant with elevated c-di-GMP levels was attenuated.120 Another approach to test the effect of c-di-GMP regulated processes on pathogenesis, bacterial aggregation was used as a surrogate phenotype for c-di-GMP levels.121 After separating aggregate from planktonic cells, the aggregates had higher levels of c-di-GMP, CgsD and curli fimbriae, whereas planktonic cells had lower levels of c-di-GMP, CsgD and curli. In an oral route of murine infection, the planktonic cells outcompeted the aggregate cells by over 2-logs.121 The planktonic cells maintained a 2-log competitive advantage over the homogenized aggregates indicating that there are additional changes to the aggregated cells beyond their ability to form biofilm.121 In another study of intraperitoneal infection, the contribution of c-di-GMP regulated processes was assessed using a mutant defective in extracellular matrix components.122 The mutant lacking csgA, bcsE, wcaM and yihO had an increase in virulence as compared to wild-type in an intraperitoneal mouse infection.122 Recently, an interesting study was conducted on the pga operon which encodes the c-di-GMP-regulated biosynthetic proteins for PNAG exopolysaccharide, that was evolutionarily lost in S. Typhimurium.123 S. Typhimurium expressing pga operon had reduced survival in macrophages and reduced virulence in an ileal loop competition experiment and intragastric infections. Interestingly, this study also showed that a mutant lacking bcsA is more virulent than the isogenic parental strain.123

The adapted molecular Koch’s postulates for signaling nucleotides can be used to assess the contribution of c-di-GMP signaling to S. Typhimurium infection. Results from various studies indicate that increase in cellular levels of c-di-GMP attenuates S. Typhimurium in ligated ileal loop and intravenous infections. These defects were likely caused by cellulose and curli since removal of genes responsible for cellulose and curli synthesis reversed the observed attenuation. In addition, introduction of PNAG in S. Typhimurium, a polysaccharide that is synthesized by some E. coli strains, is also detrimental to virulence in the mammalian host (Figure 1). Together, these results suggest that c-di-GMP signaling and c-di-GMP-regulated processes are detrimental to S. Typhimurium infections. Future work is needed to assess the c-di-GMP levels in the bacterial cells during infection to reveal if S. Typhimurium turns off c-di-GMP signaling in the mammalian host.

Clostridium difficile

Antibiotic use in clinical settings is a primary risk factor for C. difficile infection (CDI).124 CDI is a leading cause of health-care associated infections that present with a wide spectrum of diseases ranging from mild self-limiting diarrhea to pseudomembrane colitis and toxic megacolon, which often results in death (see review125). Ingested C. difficile spores germinate into their metabolically active vegetative form that express numerous genes including the TcdA/TcdB toxins, which are essential for virulence, flagella, type IV pili, adhesins, and extracellular degradative enzymes (see reviews126, 127). C. difficile TcdA and TcdB toxins are large glycosylating toxins that inactivate the Rho and Rac family of GTPases 127. The roles of flagella and type IV pili in C. difficile pathogenesis are still under investigation. C. difficile flagella is recognized by the TLR5 receptor to elicit host proinflammatory responses.128 Lastly, C. difficile metalloprotease ZmpI cleaves host fibronectin and fibrinogen129, 130 and clostridial surface proteins,130, 131 but the function of these proteins during infections has yet to be determined. In summary, C. difficile uses a number of virulence factors to cause infection in mammalian hosts.

C. difficile is unique among the pathogens discussed because its c-di-GMP signaling is primarily mediated through the action of two classes of riboswitches (see review132), consisting of twelve Cdi1133 and four Cdi2.134 The two classes of riboswitches respond differently to c-di-GMP. Cdi1 riboswitches binding to c-di-GMP lead to premature termination,133 while Cdi2 riboswitches binding to c-di-GMP allow for transcription of the full-length transcripts.135 The Cdi1_3 riboswitch is located upstream of the flgB operon 133 that encodes several early stage flagella proteins, including the SigD sigma factor. High levels of c-di-GMP repress expression of SigD.136, 137 SigD positively regulates the transcription of tcdR, an alternative sigma factor that directs transcription of tcdA and tcdB.138, 139 The consequence of elevated c-di-GMP levels and the repression of sigD by Cdi1_3 is the lack of expression of tcdR and tcdA/tcdB, leading to decrease cytoxicity in vitro.137 The riboswitch Cdi1_12 prematurely terminates the mRNA for zinc metalloprotease ZmpI (CD2830) in the presence of high c-di-GMP levels.135 Zmp1 cleave two adhesins called CD2831 and CD3246,131 and the 5’UTR of these two genes contain Cdi2 class riboswitches, Cdi2_3 and Cdi2_1, respectively.135 The ZmpI metalloprotease and its two substrates are reciprocally regulated by c-di-GMP. At high levels of c-di-GMP, expression of ZmpI is repressed while its substrates are expressed. For the Cdi2_4 riboswitch, high c-di-GMP levels allow for full-length transcription of type IV pilli that promotes bacterial motility and aggregation in vitro.140 Aside from riboswitches, PilB1, the type IV pili ATPase, is a protein receptor for c-di-GMP.141 Together, high levels of c-di-GMP activate expression of adhesins and type IV pili while repressing flagella, toxins and metalloprotease.

Currently, the contribution of c-di-GMP to C. difficile infection cannot be fully assessed by the modified molecular Koch’s postulates for signaling nucleotides. While c-di-GMP regulates gene expression of virulence factors in C. difficile, very little is known about whether c-di-GMP regulates pathogenesis during infection. Further studies are needed that explore whether c-di-GMP is required for virulence. Outstanding questions include whether DGCs and PDE-As are differentially expressed during infection, whether c-di-GMP levels are altered during infection, and whether c-di-GMP riboswitch are required for infection. Answering these questions will allow for a more complete understanding of how c-di-GMP regulates pathogenesis of C. difficile.

Summary of GI pathogens

Studies of c-di-GMP in two GI pathogens, V. cholerae and S. Typhimurium, clearly show that the expression of c-di-GMP regulated extracellular proteins, such as MSHA and curli, and polysaccharides, such as cellulose, are detrimental to the ability of the bacteria to cause infections in mammalian hosts. Curli and cellulose are also found in E. coli and appear to be anti-virulent during UTI. Expression of E. coli PNAG in S. Typhimurium also attenuated infection. These results indicate that c-di-GMP positively regulates expression of surface molecules that attenuates the bacterial pathogen during infections. Nonetheless, c-di-GMP regulated processes serve the bacteria outside the mammalian host and, in the case of V. cholerae, may aid the infection cycle outside the mammalian GI tract. Future studies to determine how well mammalian host recognize these c-di-GMP regulated surface molecules in a manner similar to MSHA will reveal why c-di-GMP attenuates mammalian infections by these GI pathogens.

Vector-borne pathogens

Two notable vector-borne bacterial pathogens, Yersinia pestis and Borrelia burgdorferi, use c-di-GMP signaling in their infection life cycle. In both cases, the bacteria require expression of different factors to survive and infect mammalian hosts and insect vectors (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

C-di-GMP signaling in vector-borne pathogens. Repression of c-di-GMP-regulated extracellular matrix components in the mammalian host prevents host immune recognition and clearance, thus allowing disseminating systemic infection. Activation of c-di-GMP-regulated extracellular matrix components in the insect vector allows bacteria to survive the insect and infect additional mammalian hosts.

Yersinia pestis

Y. pestis, the causative agent of bubonic plague, spreads from one mammalian host to another through the flea vector. Upon entry into the mammalian host, Y. pestis utilizes the type III secretion system and Pla protease to avoid immune clearance and establish systemic infection.142 Fleas feeding on the infected mammalian host ingest blood meal containing Y. pestis. Y. pestis utilizes the hemin storage system (hms) to form a biofilm on the proventriculus of the flea that effectively blocks the digestive tract, leading to starvation of the flea.143 The starving fleas continuously bite additional hosts in an attempt to feed, leading to transmission of Y. pestis to additional mammalian hosts.143

The hms genes in Y. pestis are regulated by c-di-GMP. C-di-GMP is synthesized from two DGCs, HmsT and y3730 (HmsD),144-146 and degraded by the HmsP PDE-A.147, 148 When c-di-GMP levels are high, Y. pestis utilize the hms genes to produce an exopolysaccharide that mediates biofilm formation.149 The Hms exopolysaccharide is recognized by antibodies that recognize the intercellular adhesin (ica) of Staphylococcus epidermidis, which is a PNAG polysaccharide.145 Although the c-di-GMP receptor responsible for Hms exopolysaccharide has not yet been experimentally determined, HmsR and HmsS are homologous to the PgaC and PgaD in E. coli150 that serve as the heteromeric c-di-GMP receptor for PNAG synthesis.59 Together, these studies reveal that the c-di-GMP pathway in Y. pestis regulates Hms exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation.

Several studies have characterized the roles of c-di-GMP and the Hms exopolysaccharide using various Y. pestis mutants in mice infections. A mutant lacking both DGCs, hmsT and hmsD, is able to infect mice intranasally and subcutaneously with LD50 similar to the parental strain, indicating that c-di-GMP is dispensable for mammalian infections.145 A Y. pestis hmsP mutant lacking the HmsP PDE, that has constitutively high c-di-GMP levels, can infect via the intranasal route of infection, albeit with about a 2.3-fold increase in LD50 as compared to the parental strain145. In contrast, the same hmsP mutant had a 1,000-fold increase in LD50 in a subcutaneous infection.145 The defect in subcutaneous infection for the hmsP mutant was suppressed by an additional mutation in hmsR that prevents the synthesis of the Hms exopolysaccharide.145 Together, these results indicate that the Hms exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation prevent systemic infection of mammalian hosts.

When Y. pestis is ingested by fleas, transcription of the hmsT gene is induced.146 The lower temperature in the flea also contributes to accumulation of the HmsT protein, which can lead to an increase in c-di-GMP level and the production of the Hms exopolysaccharide. The Y. pestis hmsT hmsD double mutant lacking DGCs was unable to block the proventriculus of the flea allowing the fleas to clear the mutant when inoculated at a lower dose.146 This matches previous studies in which mutants in hmsR are also unable to block the fleas and the number of bacteria in the fleas is reduced. Together, these studies show that Y. pestis increases c-di-GMP in the flea to form a biofilm and block the flea. The blocked flea will bite other mammalian hosts and infect them with Y. pestis. Once in the mammalian host, Y. pestis must reduce levels of c-di-GMP to allow dissemination and systemic infection.

Evaluation of the current literature of c-di-GMP signaling in Y. pestis pathogenesis indicates that c-di-GMP signaling is an anti-virulence factor in the mammalian host. Mutants that increase c-di-GMP levels are defective in establishing murine infections, whereas mutants lacking c-di-GMP have similar LD50 as the parental strain indicating that c-di-GMP signaling is dispensable for mammalian infections. The virulence defect of mutants with elevated c-di-GMP can be reversed by a secondary mutation in hmsR indicating that reduction in virulence caused by elevated c-di-GMP signaling is due to the production of the Hms exopolysaccharide that is cross-reactive to PNAG antibodies. Similar to E. coli, V. cholerae and S. Typhimurium, increase in c-di-GMP signaling and c-di-GMP regulated processes attenuates Y. pestis pathogenesis during infection of mammalian hosts. However, the infection cycle of Y. pestis is biphasic with the flea serving as an insect vector critical for the spread of Y. pestis to new mammalian hosts. In the flea, c-di-GMP signaling and c-di-GMP-regulated Hms exopolysaccharide allow the bacteria to block the proventriculus of the flea. This blockage serves two important functions: first, Y. pestis that cannot block the flea is cleared from the insect host; second, blocked fleas cannot feed and continue to bite mammalian host in an attempt to feed. As a consequence, the bacteria are spread to new mammalian hosts. Similar to c-di-GMP regulation of V. cholerae infections, c-di-GMP signaling pathway acts as an anti-virulence factor in the mammalian host, but serves an important function in the infection cycle within the insect vector.

Borrelia burgdorferi

B. burgdorferi is the causative agent of Lyme disease.151 After transmission from the tick vector to a mammalian host, B. burgdorferi can replicate at the bite site, disseminate and form foci of infection in various tissues.152 Since the genome of B. burgdorferi lacks genes encoding recognizable toxins, secretion systems and virulence factors found in other pathogens, Lyme disease is thought to be caused by the mammalian host immune response to the spirochete.151

B. burgdorferi utilizes c-di-GMP signaling (see review153). C-di-GMP is produced by the DGC Rrp1, which must be phosphorylated by Hk1 to be active.154 C-di-GMP is degraded by two phosphodiesterases: PdeA (BB0363)155 and PdeB (BB0374).156 B. burgdorferi encodes one PilZ domain protein, PlzA, that contain the consensus RXXXR DXSXXG motifs.157, 158 In vitro, c-di-GMP regulation of B. burgdorferi occurs by altering the expression of several genes encoding proteins, including Bdr, OspE, and OspF as well as other OspE-related proteins.159, 160 The function of c-di-GMP regulation of B. burgdorferi in the mammalian host and insect vector was investigated using individual mutants rrp1, hk1, pdeA, pdeB and plzA. Mice infected subcutaneously with a needle injection of hk1,161 rrp1,159, 162 or plzA158 mutants were all capable of establishing an infection similar to the parental strain. However, when mice were infected using the tick vector, the hk1, rrp1 and plzA single mutant strains were defective in infection of mice.158, 160, 162 The defect of these mutants is due to their inability to persist in the tick larvae and nymphs.158, 159, 161 Even ticks microinjected with B. burgdorferi hk1, rrp1 or plzA mutant cleared the bacteria,162 indicating that c-di-GMP signaling pathway is critical for B. burgdorferi survival in the tick vector.

The role of c-di-GMP signaling was also assessed using mutants lacking the two PDEs, pdeA or pdeB. The pdeA mutant was avirulent in mice through the intraperitoneal and subcutaneous route, by tail vein injection, or through tick bite.155 The pdeA mutant was able to survive in the tick, indicating the defect in the mice is due to elevated levels of c-di-GMP, not just an inability of the mutant to persist in the tick vector.155 In contrast, pdeB mutant was able to infect mice subcutaneously, but unable to infect via tick bite.156 The pdeB mutant had a similar defect in survival in ticks, indicating that pdeA and pdeB have different functions in B. burgdorferi. Future studies determining the levels of c-di-GMP in the parental, pdeA, and pdeB mutant B. burgdorferi strains will aid in interpretation of the function of phosphodiesterases in pathogenesis. B. burgdorferi with elevated levels of c-di-GMP fails to spread from the infection site,155 indicating that the bacteria must reduce c-di-GMP levels upon entry into the mammalian host.

The contribution of c-di-GMP signaling to B. burgdorferi infections assessed by the adapted molecular Koch’s postulates suggests that c-di-GMP signaling is an anti-virulence factor in the mammalian host. Similar to Y. pestis, B. burgdorferi utilizes the c-di-GMP signaling pathway to survive within the insect host, but the pathway must be turned off for successful infection of mammalian hosts. Future studies are needed to identify the c-di-GMP regulated processes that promote survival in the tick and attenuate infection of B. burgdorferi in the mammalian host. Identification of these c-di-GMP regulated processes will complete our understanding of c-di-GMP regulation of B. burgdorferi pathogenesis.

Summary of vector-borne pathogens

Studies from these two c-di-GMP utilizing vector-borne pathogens reveal that the bacteria utilize c-di-GMP levels in the insect vector in order to survive and potentially induce the vector to feed more often. Once back in the mammalian host, the c-di-GMP pathway must be turned off in order to allow the bacteria to disseminate from the subcutaneous site to cause systemic infection.

Conclusion

C-di-GMP regulation of bacterial virulence is specific to each pathogen, strain, and type of infection. Differences in the composition and structure of extracellular matrix components could underlie the variation in immune response in the mammalian host. For HAI pathogens, there are some infections, such as P. aeruginosa infection in CF patients and on medical devices, that are enhanced by high c-di-GMP levels and c-di-GMP-regulated production of alginate, Psl and Pel exopolysaccharides. In contrast, most infections of mammalian host by GI and vector-borne pathogens are attenuated by high levels of c-di-GMP and the c-di-GMP-mediated activation of extracellular matrix components, including polysaccharides (cellulose and PNAG) and surface protein polymers (MSHA and curli). Bacteria expressing these extracellular matrix components in the mammalian host can be recognized by the immune system leading to immune clearance. To enhance infection, a subset of pathogens reduces c-di-GMP levels during infection in the mammalian host. Outside the mammalian host, these pathogens benefit from c-di-GMP activation of extracellular matrix components that enhance biofilm formation. For GI pathogens that exit into the environment, bacteria in the biofilm state can better survive hypotonic stress and re-enter into the acidic environment of the mammalian stomach. For vector borne pathogens, biofilms allow the bacteria to survive in the insect vector. Future studies determining the levels of c-di-GMP in the bacteria during infection of mammalian host, the contribution of c-di-GMP receptors and regulated processes will further reveal how c-di-GMP signaling pathway regulates bacterial pathogenesis.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge support to V.T.L (NIH AI110740). We thank Anna B. Seminara for reviewing the manuscript and helping with the figures.

References

  • 1.Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77:1–52. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00043-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Orr MW, Donaldson GP, Severin GB, Wang J, Sintim HO, Waters CM, Lee VT. Oligoribonuclease is the primary degradative enzyme for pGpG in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that is required for cyclic-di-GMP turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:E5048–5057. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507245112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cohen D, Mechold U, Nevenzal H, Yarmiyhu Y, Randall TE, Bay DC, Rich JD, Parsek MR, Kaever V, Harrison JJ, et al. Oligoribonuclease is a central feature of cyclic diguanylate signaling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:11359–11364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421450112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bowman L, Zeden MS, Schuster CF, Kaever V, Grundling A. New Insights into the Cyclic di-adenosine Monophosphate (c-di-AMP) Degradation Pathway and the Requirement of the Cyclic Dinucleotide for Acid Stress Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:26970–26986. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.747709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krasteva PV, Sondermann H. Versatile modes of cellular regulation via cyclic dinucleotides. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:350–359. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Falkow S. Molecular Koch's postulates applied to microbial pathogenicity. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10(2):S274–276. doi: 10.1093/cid/10.supplement_2.s274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Coggan KA, Wolfgang MC. Global regulatory pathways and cross-talk control Pseudomonas aeruginosa environmental lifestyle and virulence phenotype. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2012;14:47–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wolfgang MC, Lee VT, Gilmore ME, Lory S. Coordinate regulation of bacterial virulence genes by a novel adenylate cyclase-dependent signaling pathway. Dev Cell. 2003;4:253–263. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00019-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fuchs EL, Brutinel ED, Klem ER, Fehr AR, Yahr TL, Wolfgang MC. In vitro and in vivo characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa cyclic AMP (cAMP) phosphodiesterase CpdA, required for cAMP homeostasis and virulence factor regulation. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:2779–2790. doi: 10.1128/JB.00168-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marsden AE, Intile PJ, Schulmeyer KH, Simmons-Patterson ER, Urbanowski ML, Wolfgang MC, Yahr TL. Vfr Directly Activates exsA Transcription To Regulate Expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System. J Bacteriol. 2016;198:1442–1450. doi: 10.1128/JB.00049-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Frank DW, Iglewski BH. Cloning and sequence analysis of a trans-regulatory locus required for exoenzyme S synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:6460–6468. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.20.6460-6468.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Smith RS, Wolfgang MC, Lory S. An adenylate cyclase-controlled signaling network regulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in a mouse model of acute pneumonia. Infect Immun. 2004;72:1677–1684. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1677-1684.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Simm R, Morr M, Kader A, Nimtz M, Romling U. GGDEF and EAL domains inversely regulate cyclic di-GMP levels and transition from sessility to motility. Mol Microbiol. 2004;53:1123–1134. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gellatly SL, Hancock RE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses. Pathog Dis. 2013;67:159–173. doi: 10.1111/2049-632X.12033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Govan JR, Deretic V. Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:539–574. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.3.539-574.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, Fridkin SK. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:996–1011. doi: 10.1086/591861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mann EE, Wozniak DJ. Pseudomonas biofilm matrix composition and niche biology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36:893–916. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00322.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ha DG, O'Toole GA. c-di-GMP and its Effects on Biofilm Formation and Dispersion: a Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Review. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0003-2014. MB-0003-2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Valentini M, Filloux A. Biofilms and Cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) Signaling: Lessons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Other Bacteria. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:12547–12555. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R115.711507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kulasakara H, Lee V, Brencic A, Liberati N, Urbach J, Miyata S, Lee DG, Neely AN, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, et al. Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases reveals a role for bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic-GMP in virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2839–2844. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511090103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Merighi M, Lee VT, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, Lory S. The second messenger bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic-GMP and its PilZ domain-containing receptor Alg44 are required for alginate biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65:876–895. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hickman JW, Harwood CS. Identification of FleQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a c-di-GMP-responsive transcription factor. Mol Microbiol. 2008;69:376–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06281.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Borlee BR, Goldman AD, Murakami K, Samudrala R, Wozniak DJ, Parsek MR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses a cyclic-di-GMP-regulated adhesin to reinforce the biofilm extracellular matrix. Mol Microbiol. 2010;75:827–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06991.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baraquet C, Harwood CS. FleQ DNA Binding Consensus Sequence Revealed by Studies of FleQ-Dependent Regulation of Biofilm Gene Expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2016;198:178–186. doi: 10.1128/JB.00539-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Matsuyama BY, Krasteva PV, Baraquet C, Harwood CS, Sondermann H, Navarro MV. Mechanistic insights into c-di-GMP-dependent control of the biofilm regulator FleQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E209–218. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523148113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Baraquet C, Harwood CS. Cyclic diguanosine monophosphate represses bacterial flagella synthesis by interacting with the Walker A motif of the enhancer-binding protein FleQ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:18478–18483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318972110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee VT, Matewish JM, Kessler JL, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, Lory S. A cyclic-di-GMP receptor required for bacterial exopolysaccharide production. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65:1474–1484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05879.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li Z, Chen JH, Hao Y, Nair SK. Structures of the PelD cyclic diguanylate effector involved in pellicle formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:30191–30204. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.378273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Whitney JC, Colvin KM, Marmont LS, Robinson H, Parsek MR, Howell PL. Structure of the cytoplasmic region of PelD, a degenerate diguanylate cyclase receptor that regulates exopolysaccharide production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:23582–23593. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.375378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu L, Venkataramani P, Ding Y, Liu Y, Deng Y, Yong GL, Xin L, Ye R, Zhang L, Yang L, et al. A Cyclic di-GMP-binding Adaptor Protein Interacts with Histidine Kinase to Regulate Two-component Signaling. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:16112–16123. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.730887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McCarthy RR, Mazon-Moya MJ, Moscoso JA, Hao Y, Lam JS, Bordi C, Mostowy S, Filloux A. Cyclic-di-GMP regulates lipopolysaccharide modification and contributes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa immune evasion. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:17027. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chambers JR, Liao J, Schurr MJ, Sauer K. BrlR from Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a c-di-GMP-responsive transcription factor. Mol Microbiol. 2014;92:471–487. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu L, Xin L, Zeng Y, Yam JKH, Ding Y, Venkataramani P, Cheang QW, Yang X, Tang X, Zhang LH, et al. A cyclic di-GMP-binding adaptor protein interacts with a chemotaxis methyltransferase to control flagellar motor switching. Science Signaling. 2016;9:raX. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaf7584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baker AE, Diepold A, Kuchma SL, Scott JE, Ha DG, Orazi G, Armitage JP, O'Toole GA. PilZ Domain Protein FlgZ Mediates Cyclic Di-GMP-Dependent Swarming Motility Control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2016;198:1837–1846. doi: 10.1128/JB.00196-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kazmierczak BI, Lebron MB, Murray TS. Analysis of FimX, a phosphodiesterase that governs twitching motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:1026–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05156.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Smith EE, Buckley DG, Wu Z, Saenphimmachak C, Hoffman LR, D'Argenio DA, Miller SI, Ramsey BW, Speert DP, Moskowitz SM, et al. Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:8487–8492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602138103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Starkey M, Hickman JH, Ma L, Zhang N, De Long S, Hinz A, Palacios S, Manoil C, Kirisits MJ, Starner TD, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa rugose small-colony variants have adaptations that likely promote persistence in the cystic fibrosis lung. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:3492–3503. doi: 10.1128/JB.00119-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Clarke LL, Grubb BR, Gabriel SE, Smithies O, Koller BH, Boucher RC. Defective epithelial chloride transport in a gene-targeted mouse model of cystic fibrosis. Science. 1992;257:1125–1128. doi: 10.1126/science.257.5073.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mall M, Grubb BR, Harkema JR, O'Neal WK, Boucher RC. Increased airway epithelial Na+ absorption produces cystic fibrosis-like lung disease in mice. Nat Med. 2004;10:487–493. doi: 10.1038/nm1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Malone JG, Jaeger T, Manfredi P, Dotsch A, Blanka A, Bos R, Cornelis GR, Haussler S, Jenal U. The YfiBNR signal transduction mechanism reveals novel targets for the evolution of persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis airways. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002760. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Christensen LD, van Gennip M, Rybtke MT, Wu H, Chiang WC, Alhede M, Hoiby N, Nielsen TE, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T. Clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa foreign-body biofilm infections through reduction of the cyclic Di-GMP level in the bacteria. Infect Immun. 2013;81:2705–2713. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00332-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cole SJ, Lee VT. Cyclic Di-GMP Signaling Contributes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Mediated Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection. J Bacteriol. 2015;198:91–97. doi: 10.1128/JB.00410-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ha DG, Richman ME, O'Toole GA. Deletion mutant library for investigation of functional outputs of cyclic diguanylate metabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:3384–3393. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00299-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Byrd MS, Pang B, Hong W, Waligora EA, Juneau RA, Armbruster CE, Weimer KE, Murrah K, Mann EE, Lu H, et al. Direct Evaluation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Mediators in a Chronic Infection Model. Infect Immun. 2011;79:3087–3095. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00057-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Potvin E, Lehoux DE, Kukavica-Ibrulj I, Richard KL, Sanschagrin F, Lau GW, Levesque RC. In vivo functional genomics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for high-throughput screening of new virulence factors and antibacterial targets. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5:1294–1308. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00542.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jones CJ, Wozniak DJ. Psl Produced by Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Contributes to the Establishment of Biofilms and Immune Evasion. MBio. 2017;8 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00864-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HLT. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2004;2:123–140. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Croxen MA, Finlay BB. Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2009;2:123–113. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rasko DA, Rosovitz MJ, Myers GS, Mongodin EF, Fricke WF, Gajer P, Crabtree J, Sebaihia M, Thomson NR, Chaudhuri R, et al. The pangenome structure of Escherichia coli: comparative genomic analysis of E. coli commensal and pathogenic isolates. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:6881–6893. doi: 10.1128/JB.00619-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Touchon M, Hoede C, Tenaillon O, Barbe V, Baeriswyl S, Bidet P, Bingen E, Bonacorsi S, Bouchier C, Bouvet O, et al. Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Povolotsky TL, Hengge R. Genome-Based Comparison of Cyclic Di-GMP Signaling in Pathogenic and Commensal Escherichia coli Strains. J Bacteriol. 2015;198:111–126. doi: 10.1128/JB.00520-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ross P, Weinhouse H, Aloni Y, Michaeli D, Ohana P, Mayer R, Braun S, de Vroom GE, van der Marel A, van Boom JH, et al. Regulation of cellulose synthesis in Acetobacter xylinum by cyclic diguanylic acid. Nature. 1987;325:279–281. doi: 10.1038/325279a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fang X, Ahmad I, Blanka A, Schottkowski M, Cimdins A, Galperin MY, Römling U, Gomelsky M. GIL, a new c-di-GMP-binding protein domain involved in regulation of cellulose synthesis in enterobacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2014;93:439–452. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Paul K, Nieto V, Carlquist WC, Blair DF, Harshey RM. The c-di-GMP binding protein YcgR controls flagellar motor direction and speed to affect chemotaxis by a “backstop brake” mechanism. Mol Cell. 2010;38:128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Boehm A, Kaiser M, Li H, Spangler C, Kasper CA, Ackermann M, Kaever V, Sourjik V, Roth V, Jenal U. Second messenger-mediated adjustment of bacterial swimming velocity. Cell. 2010;141:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hengge R. Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:263–273. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Amikam D, Galperin MY. PilZ domain is part of the bacterial c-di-GMP binding protein. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:3–6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Morgan JL, McNamara JT, Zimmer J. Mechanism of activation of bacterial cellulose synthase by cyclic di-GMP. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:489–496. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Steiner S, Lori C, Boehm A, Jenal U. Allosteric activation of exopolysaccharide synthesis through cyclic di-GMP-stimulated protein-protein interaction. EMBO J. 2013;32:354–368. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Weber H, Pesavento C, Possling A, Tischendorf G, Hengge R. Cyclic-di-GMP-mediated signalling within the sigma network of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2006;62:1014–1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05440.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pesavento C, Becker G, Sommerfeldt N, Possling A, Tschowri N, Mehlis A, Hengge R. Inverse regulatory coordination of motility and curli-mediated adhesion in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2434–2446. doi: 10.1101/gad.475808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Raterman EL, Shapiro DD, Stevens DJ, Schwartz KJ, Welch RA. Genetic analysis of the role of yfiR in the ability of Escherichia coli CFT073 to control cellular cyclic dimeric GMP levels and to persist in the urinary tract. Infect Immun. 2013;81:3089–3098. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01396-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Spurbeck RR, Tarrien RJ, Mobley HLT. Enzymatically Active and Inactive Phosphodiesterases and Diguanylate Cyclases Are Involved in Regulation of Motility or Sessility in Escherichia coli CFT073. mBio. 2012;3 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00307-12. e00307-00312-e00307-00312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kansal R, Rasko DA, Sahl JW, Munson GP, Roy K, Luo Q, Sheikh A, Kuhne KJ, Fleckenstein JM. Transcriptional Modulation of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Virulence Genes in Response to Epithelial Cell Interactions. Infection and Immunity. 2012;81:259–270. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00919-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hu J, Wang B, Fang X, Means WJ, McCormick RJ, Gomelsky M, Zhu MJ. c-di-GMP signaling regulates E. coli O157:H7 adhesion to colonic epithelium. Vet Microbiol. 2013;164:344–351. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Richter AM, Povolotsky TL, Wieler LH, Hengge R. Cyclic-di-GMP signalling and biofilm-related properties of the Shiga toxin-producing 2011 German outbreak Escherichia coli O104:H4. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6:1622–1637. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Paczosa MK, Mecsas J. Klebsiella pneumoniae: Going on the Offense with a Strong Defense. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80:629–661. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00078-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cruz DP, Huertas MG, Lozano M, Zarate L, Zambrano MM. Comparative analysis of diguanylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tu YC, Lu MC, Chiang MK, Huang SP, Peng HL, Chang HY, Jan MS, Lai YC. Genetic requirements for Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced liver abscess in an oral infection model. Infect Immun. 2009;77:2657–2671. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01523-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gerlach GF, Allen BL, Clegg S. Molecular characterization of the type 3 (MR/K) fimbriae of Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:3547–3553. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.8.3547-3553.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gerlach GF, Clegg S, Allen BL. Identification and characterization of the genes encoding the type 3 and type 1 fimbrial adhesins of Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:1262–1270. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.3.1262-1270.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Langstraat J, Bohse M, Clegg S. Type 3 fimbrial shaft (MrkA) of Klebsiella pneumoniae, but not the fimbrial adhesin (MrkD), facilitates biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2001;69:5805–5812. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5805-5812.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wilksch JJ, Yang J, Clements A, Gabbe JL, Short KR, Cao H, Cavaliere R, James CE, Whitchurch CB, Schembri MA, et al. MrkH, a novel c-di-GMP-dependent transcriptional activator, controls Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formation by regulating type 3 fimbriae expression. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002204. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Johnson JG, Murphy CN, Sippy J, Johnson TJ, Clegg S. Type 3 fimbriae and biofilm formation are regulated by the transcriptional regulators MrkHI in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:3453–3460. doi: 10.1128/JB.00286-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yang J, Wilksch JJ, Tan JW, Hocking DM, Webb CT, Lithgow T, Robins-Browne RM, Strugnell RA. Transcriptional activation of the mrkA promoter of the Klebsiella pneumoniae type 3 fimbrial operon by the c-di-GMP-dependent MrkH protein. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Johnson JG, Clegg S. Role of MrkJ, a phosphodiesterase, in type 3 fimbrial expression and biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:3944–3950. doi: 10.1128/JB.00304-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Huang CJ, Wang ZC, Huang HY, Huang HD, Peng HL. YjcC, a c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase protein, regulates the oxidative stress response and virulence of Klebsiella pneumoniae CG43. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zogaj X, Bokranz W, Nimtz M, Romling U. Production of cellulose and curli fimbriae by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun. 2003;71:4151–4158. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.7.4151-4158.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Clemens JD, Nair GB, Ahmed T, Qadri F, Holmgren J. Cholera. Lancet. 2017 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30559-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Almagro-Moreno S, Pruss K, Taylor RK. Intestinal Colonization Dynamics of Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004787. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhu J, Mekalanos JJ. Quorum sensing-dependent biofilms enhance colonization in Vibrio cholerae. Dev Cell. 2003;5:647–656. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00295-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Holmgren J, Lonnroth I, Mansson J, Svennerholm L. Interaction of cholera toxin and membrane GM1 ganglioside of small intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975;72:2520–2524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tsai B, Rapoport TA. Unfolded cholera toxin is transferred to the ER membrane and released from protein disulfide isomerase upon oxidation by Ero1. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:207–216. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200207120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gill DM, Meren R. ADP-ribosylation of membrane proteins catalyzed by cholera toxin: basis of the activation of adenylate cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75:3050–3054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cassel D, Pfeuffer T. Mechanism of cholera toxin action: covalent modification of the guanyl nucleotide-binding protein of the adenylate cyclase system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75:2669–2673. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gabriel SE, Brigman KN, Koller BH, Boucher RC, Stutts MJ. Cystic fibrosis heterozygote resistance to cholera toxin in the cystic fibrosis mouse model. Science. 1994;266:107–109. doi: 10.1126/science.7524148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hammer BK, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50:101–104. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Conner JG, Zamorano-Sanchez D, Park JH, Sondermann H, Yildiz FH. The ins and outs of cyclic di-GMP signaling in Vibrio cholerae. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;36:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pratt JT, Tamayo R, Tischler AD, Camilli A. PilZ domain proteins bind cyclic diguanylate and regulate diverse processes in Vibrio cholerae. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:12860–12870. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611593200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Benach J, Swaminathan SS, Tamayo R, Handelman SK, Folta-Stogniew E, Ramos JE, Forouhar F, Neely H, Seetharaman J, Camilli A, et al. The structural basis of cyclic diguanylate signal transduction by PilZ domains. Embo J. 2007;26:5153–5166. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Krasteva PV, Fong JC, Shikuma NJ, Beyhan S, Navarro MV, Yildiz FH, Sondermann H. Vibrio cholerae VpsT regulates matrix production and motility by directly sensing cyclic di-GMP. Science. 2010;327:866–868. doi: 10.1126/science.1181185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Srivastava D, Harris RC, Waters CM. Integration of cyclic di-GMP and quorum sensing in the control of vpsT and aphA in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:6331–6341. doi: 10.1128/JB.05167-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Srivastava D, Hsieh ML, Khataokar A, Neiditch MB, Waters CM. Cyclic di-GMP inhibits Vibrio cholerae motility by repressing induction of transcription and inducing extracellular polysaccharide production. Mol Microbiol. 2013;90:1262–1276. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Roelofs KG, Jones CJ, Helman SR, Shang X, Orr MW, Goodson JR, Galperin MY, Yildiz FH, Lee VT. Systematic Identification of Cyclic-di-GMP Binding Proteins in Vibrio cholerae Reveals a Novel Class of Cyclic-di-GMP-Binding ATPases Associated with Type II Secretion Systems. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005232. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Jones CJ, Utada A, Davis KR, Thongsomboon W, Zamorano Sanchez D, Banakar V, Cegelski L, Wong GC, Yildiz FH. C-di-GMP Regulates Motile to Sessile Transition by Modulating MshA Pili Biogenesis and Near-Surface Motility Behavior in Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005068. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Beyhan S, Tischler AD, Camilli A, Yildiz FH. Transcriptome and phenotypic responses of Vibrio cholerae to increased cyclic di-GMP level. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:3600–3613. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.10.3600-3613.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yildiz FH, Visick KL. Vibrio biofilms: so much the same yet so different. Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Chiavelli DA, Marsh JW, Taylor RK. The mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin of Vibrio cholerae promotes adherence to zooplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:3220–3225. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.7.3220-3225.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zampini M, Canesi L, Betti M, Ciacci C, Tarsi R, Gallo G, Pruzzo C. Role for mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin in promoting interactions between Vibrio cholerae El Tor and mussel hemolymph. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:5711–5715. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5711-5715.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kamruzzaman M, Udden SM, Cameron DE, Calderwood SB, Nair GB, Mekalanos JJ, Faruque SM. Quorum-regulated biofilms enhance the development of conditionally viable, environmental Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:1588–1593. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913404107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hung DT, Mekalanos JJ. Bile acids induce cholera toxin expression in Vibrio cholerae in a ToxT-independent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:3028–3033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409559102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hsiao A, Liu Z, Joelsson A, Zhu J. Vibrio cholerae virulence regulator-coordinated evasion of host immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14542–14547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604650103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Schild S, Tamayo R, Nelson EJ, Qadri F, Calderwood SB, Camilli A. Genes induced late in infection increase fitness of Vibrio cholerae after release into the environment. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2:264–277. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Townsley L, Yildiz FH. Temperature affects c-di-GMP signalling and biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:4290–4305. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Hartley DM, Morris JG, Jr, Smith DL. Hyperinfectivity: a critical element in the ability of V. cholerae to cause epidemics? PLoS Med. 2006;3:e7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zhang S, Kingsley RA, Santos RL, Andrews-Polymenis H, Raffatellu M, Figueiredo J, Nunes J, Tsolis RM, Adams LG, Bäumler AJ. Molecular Pathogenesis of Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium-Induced Diarrhea. Infection and Immunity. 2003;71:1–12. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.1.1-12.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Fabrega A, Vila J. Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium skills to succeed in the host: virulence and regulation. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2013;26:308–341. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00066-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gart EV, Suchodolski JS, Welsh TH, Alaniz RC, Randel RD, Lawhon SD. Salmonella Typhimurium and Multidirectional Communication in the Gut. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:1185–1118. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kader A, Simm R, Gerstel U, Morr M, Romling U. Hierarchical involvement of various GGDEF domain proteins in rdar morphotype development of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:602–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Ahmad I, Lamprokostopoulou A, Le Guyon S, Streck E, Barthel M, Peters V, Hardt WD, Römling U. Complex c-di-GMP Signaling Networks Mediate Transition between Virulence Properties and Biofilm Formation in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28351–28315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Römling U. Characterization of the rdar morphotype, a multicellular behaviour in Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:1234–1246. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-4557-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Garcia B, Latasa C, Solano C, Garcia-del Portillo F, Gamazo C, Lasa I. Role of the GGDEF protein family in Salmonella cellulose biosynthesis and biofilm formation. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54:264–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Simm R, Remminghorst U, Ahmad I, Zakikhany K, Romling U. A Role for the EAL-Like Protein STM1344 in Regulation of CsgD Expression and Motility in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Journal of Bacteriology. 2009;191:3928–3937. doi: 10.1128/JB.00290-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Simm R, Lusch A, Kader A, Andersson M, Romling U. Role of EAL-Containing Proteins in Multicellular Behavior of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007;189:3613–3623. doi: 10.1128/JB.01719-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Le Guyon S, Simm R, Rehn M, Römling U. Dissecting the cyclic di-guanylate monophosphate signalling network regulating motility in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Environmental Microbiology. 2015;17:1310–1320. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Pultz IS, Christen M, Kulasekara HD, Kennard A, Kulasekara B, Miller SI. The response threshold of Salmonella PilZ domain proteins is determined by their binding affinities for c-di-GMP. Molecular Microbiology. 2012;86:1424–1440. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ahmad I, Rouf SF, Sun L, Cimdins A, Shafeeq S, Guyon S, Schottkowski M, Rhen M, Römling U. BcsZ inhibits biofilm phenotypes and promotes virulence by blocking cellulose production in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Microbial Cell Factories. 2016:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0576-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Ahmad I, Cimdins A, Beske T, Römling U. Detailed analysis of c-di-GMP mediated regulation of csgD expression in Salmonella typhimurium. BMC Microbiology. 2017:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0934-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lamprokostopoulou A, Monteiro C, Rhen M, Römling U. Cyclic di-GMP signalling controls virulence properties of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium at the mucosal lining. Environmental Microbiology. 2010;12:40–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hisert KB, MacCoss M, Shiloh MU, Darwin KH, Singh S, Jones RA, Ehrt S, Zhang Z, Gaffney BL, Gandotra S, et al. A glutamate-alanine-leucine (EAL) domain protein of Salmonella controls bacterial survival in mice, antioxidant defence and killing of macrophages: role of cyclic diGMP. Molecular Microbiology. 2005;56:1234–1245. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.MacKenzie KD, Wang Y, Shivak DJ, Wong CS, Hoffman LJL, Lam S, Kröger C, Cameron ADS, Townsend HGG, Köster W, et al. Bistable Expression of CsgD in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Connects Virulence to Persistence. Infection and Immunity. 2015;83:2312–2326. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00137-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Adcox HE, Vasicek EM, Dwivedi V, Hoang KV, Turner J, Gunn JS. Salmonella Extracellular Matrix Components Influence Biofilm Formation and Gallbladder Colonization. Infection and Immunity. 2016;84:3243–3251. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00532-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Echeverz M, Garcia B, Sabalza A, Valle J, Gabaldon T, Solano C, Lasa I. Lack of the PGA exopolysaccharide in Salmonella as an adaptive trait for survival in the host. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Deshpande A, Pasupuleti V, Thota P, Pant C, Rolston DD, Hernandez AV, Donskey CJ, Fraser TG. Risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:452–460. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Napolitano LM, Edmiston CE., Jr Clostridium difficile disease: Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment update. Surgery. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Janoir C. Virulence factors of Clostridium difficile and their role during infection. Anaerobe. 2016;37:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Awad MM, Johanesen PA, Carter GP, Rose E, Lyras D. Clostridium difficile virulence factors: Insights into an anaerobic spore-forming pathogen. Gut Microbes. 2014;5:579–593. doi: 10.4161/19490976.2014.969632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Yoshino Y, Kitazawa T, Ikeda M, Tatsuno K, Yanagimoto S, Okugawa S, Yotsuyanagi H, Ota Y. Clostridium difficile flagellin stimulates toll-like receptor 5, and toxin B promotes flagellin-induced chemokine production via TLR5. Life Sci. 2013;92:211–217. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Cafardi V, Biagini M, Martinelli M, Leuzzi R, Rubino JT, Cantini F, Norais N, Scarselli M, Serruto D, Unnikrishnan M. Identification of a Novel Zinc Metalloprotease through a Global Analysis of Clostridium difficile Extracellular Proteins. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81306–81314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Hensbergen PJ, Klychnikov OI, Bakker D, van Winden VJ, Ras N, Kemp AC, Cordfunke RA, Dragan I, Deelder AM, Kuijper EJ, et al. A novel secreted metalloprotease (CD2830) from Clostridium difficile cleaves specific proline sequences in LPXTG cell surface proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:1231–1244. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.034728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Peltier J, Shaw HA, Couchman EC, Dawson LF, Yu L, Choudhary JS, Kaever V, Wren BW, Fairweather NF. Cyclic diGMP regulates production of sortase substrates of Clostridium difficile and their surface exposure through ZmpI protease-mediated cleavage. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:24453–24469. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.665091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Bordeleau E, Burrus V. Cyclic-di-GMP signaling in the Gram-positive pathogen Clostridium difficile. Curr Genet. 2015;61:497–502. doi: 10.1007/s00294-015-0484-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Sudarsan N, Lee ER, Weinberg Z, Moy RH, Kim JN, Link KH, Breaker RR. Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger cyclic di-GMP. Science. 2008;321:411–413. doi: 10.1126/science.1159519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Lee ER, Baker JL, Weinberg Z, Sudarsan N, Breaker RR. An allosteric self-splicing ribozyme triggered by a bacterial second messenger. Science. 2010;329:845–848. doi: 10.1126/science.1190713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Soutourina OA, Monot M, Boudry P, Saujet L, Pichon C, Sismeiro O, Semenova E, Severinov K, Le Bouguenec C, Coppee JY, et al. Genome-wide identification of regulatory RNAs in the human pathogen Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Purcell EB, McKee RW, McBride SM, Waters CM, Tamayo R. Cyclic Diguanylate Inversely Regulates Motility and Aggregation in Clostridium difficile. Journal of Bacteriology. 2012;194:3307–3316. doi: 10.1128/JB.00100-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.McKee RW, Mangalea MR, Purcell EB, Borchardt EK, Tamayo R. The Second Messenger Cyclic Di-GMP Regulates Clostridium difficile Toxin Production by Controlling Expression of sigD. Journal of Bacteriology. 2013;195:5174–5185. doi: 10.1128/JB.00501-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Aubry A, Hussack G, Chen W, KuoLee R, Twine SM, Fulton KM, Foote S, Carrillo CD, Tanha J, Logan SM. Modulation of Toxin Production by the Flagellar Regulon in Clostridium difficile. Infection and Immunity. 2012;80:3521–3532. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00224-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.El Meouche I, Peltier J, Monot M, Soutourina O, Pestel-Caron M, Dupuy B, Pons JL. Characterization of the SigD Regulon of C. difficile and Its Positive Control of Toxin Production through the Regulation of tcdR. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e83748–83717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Bordeleau E, Purcell EB, Lafontaine DA, Fortier LC, Tamayo R, Burrus V. Cyclic di-GMP riboswitch-regulated type IV pili contribute to aggregation of Clostridium difficile. J Bacteriol. 2015;197:819–832. doi: 10.1128/JB.02340-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Hendrick WA, Orr MW, Murray SR, Lee VT, Melville SB. Cyclic Di-GMP Binding by an Assembly ATPase (PilB2) and Control of Type IV Pilin Polymerization in the Gram-Positive Pathogen Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol. 2017:199. doi: 10.1128/JB.00034-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Perry RD, Fetherston JD. Yersinia pestis--etiologic agent of plague. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:35–66. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Hinnebusch BJ, Perry RD, Schwan TG. Role of the Yersinia pestis hemin storage (hms) locus in the transmission of plague by fleas. Science. 1996;273:367–370. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5273.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Simm R, Fetherston JD, Kader A, Römling U, Perry RD. Phenotypic convergence mediated by GGDEF-domain-containing proteins. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:6816–6823. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.19.6816-6823.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Bobrov AG, Kirillina O, Ryjenkov DA, Waters CM, Price PA, Fetherston JD, Mack D, Goldman WE, Gomelsky M, Perry RD. Systematic analysis of cyclic di-GMP signalling enzymes and their role in biofilm formation and virulence in Yersinia pestis. Mol Microbiol. 2011;79:533–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07470.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Sun YC, Koumoutsi A, Jarrett C, Lawrence K, Gherardini FC, Darby C, Hinnebusch BJ. Differential control of Yersinia pestis biofilm formation in vitro and in the flea vector by two c-di-GMP diguanylate cyclases. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Kirillina O, Fetherston JD, Bobrov AG, Abney J, Perry RD. HmsP, a putative phosphodiesterase, and HmsT, a putative diguanylate cyclase, control Hms-dependent biofilm formation in Yersinia pestis. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54:75–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Bobrov AG, Kirillina O, Perry RD. The phosphodiesterase activity of the HmsP EAL domain is required for negative regulation of biofilm formation in Yersinia pestis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;247:123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Perry RD, Pendrak ML, Schuetze P. Identification and cloning of a hemin storage locus involved in the pigmentation phenotype of Yersinia pestis. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:5929–5937. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.10.5929-5937.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Hinnebusch BJ, Erickson DL. Yersinia pestis biofilm in the flea vector and its role in the transmission of plague. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2008;322:229–248. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Bockenstedt L. Lyme disease. In: Firestein GS, Budd RC, Gabriel SE, McInnes IB, O’Dell JR, editors. Kelley's textbook of rheumatology. 9th. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2013. pp. 1815–1828. [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Bockenstedt LK, Wormser GP. Review: unraveling Lyme disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:2313–2323. doi: 10.1002/art.38756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Novak EA, Sultan SZ, Motaleb MA. The cyclic-di-GMP signaling pathway in the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:56. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Ryjenkov DA, Tarutina M, Moskvin OV, Gomelsky M. Cyclic diguanylate is a ubiquitous signaling molecule in bacteria: insights into biochemistry of the GGDEF protein domain. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:1792–1798. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.5.1792-1798.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Sultan SZ, Pitzer JE, Miller MR, Motaleb MA. Analysis of a Borrelia burgdorferi phosphodiesterase demonstrates a role for cyclic-di-guanosine monophosphate in motility and virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2010;77:128–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07191.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Sultan SZ, Pitzer JE, Boquoi T, Hobbs G, Miller MR, Motaleb MA. Analysis of the HD-GYP domain cyclic dimeric GMP phosphodiesterase reveals a role in motility and the enzootic life cycle of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2011;79:3273–3283. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05153-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Freedman JC, Rogers EA, Kostick JL, Zhang H, Iyer R, Schwartz I, Marconi RT. Identification and molecular characterization of a cyclic-di-GMP effector protein, PlzA (BB0733): additional evidence for the existence of a functional cyclic-di-GMP regulatory network in the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010;58:285–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00635.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Pitzer JE, Sultan SZ, Hayakawa Y, Hobbs G, Miller MR, Motaleb MA. Analysis of the Borrelia burgdorferi cyclic-di-GMP-binding protein PlzA reveals a role in motility and virulence. Infect Immun. 2011;79:1815–1825. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00075-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Kostick JL, Szkotnicki LT, Rogers EA, Bocci P, Raffaelli N, Marconi RT. The diguanylate cyclase, Rrp1, regulates critical steps in the enzootic cycle of the Lyme disease spirochetes. Mol Microbiol. 2011;81:219–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07687.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Caimano MJ, Dunham-Ems S, Allard AM, Cassera MB, Kenedy M, Radolf JD. Cyclic di-GMP modulates gene expression in Lyme disease spirochetes at the tick-mammal interface to promote spirochete survival during the blood meal and tick-to-mammal transmission. Infect Immun. 2015;83:3043–3060. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00315-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Caimano MJ, Kenedy MR, Kairu T, Desrosiers DC, Harman M, Dunham-Ems S, Akins DR, Pal U, Radolf JD. The hybrid histidine kinase Hk1 is part of a two-component system that is essential for survival of Borrelia burgdorferi in feeding Ixodes scapularis ticks. Infect Immun. 2011;79:3117–3130. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05136-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.He M, Ouyang Z, Troxell B, Xu H, Moh A, Piesman J, Norgard MV, Gomelsky M, Yang XF. Cyclic di-GMP is essential for the survival of the lyme disease spirochete in ticks. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002133. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES