Abstract Abstract
Spiranthes himalayensis is described here as a new species based primarily on molecular phylogenetic evidence followed by morphological comparison with other Asian Spiranthes species. It is distributed widely from southern India to tropical China. Phylogenetic analysis shows its close affinity to S. nivea which is endemic to Taiwan. Morphologically, the new species looks close to S. sinensis and S. hongkongensis. S. himalayensis is an allogamous species which can be differentiated from its allies on the basis of pubescent plant body, floral bract longer or of the same length as that of ovary, petals with blunt apex, labellum width around hypochile same as the width of epichile, epichile widely flabellate or semi-tunicate, column length equal to or more than 1.5mm, clavate operculum attached to the column on the broader part by an arm-like extension emerging from the upper part of column and a well developed rostellum partitioning the stigma and pollinarium.
Keywords: Karnataka, Manipur, Orchid, Spiranthes hongkongensis, Spiranthes nivea, Spiranthes sinensis, Tamil Nadu, Yunnan, India, China
Introduction
Spiranthes Richard (1817:28) is a genus of terrestrial herbs belonging to the family Orchidaceae, comprising about 36 species, four varieties and four natural hybrids (Govaerts et al. 2017). The genus is widely distributed from Eurasia to Southwest Pacific, North Africa, North and Central America to the Caribbean (Govaerts et al. 2017). Of these, around seven species are found in Asia, including three in China and two in India (Chen et al. 2009, Zhou et al. 2016, Govaerts et al. 2017).
While sampling Spiranthes in an aim to study the evolution and phylogeography of the genus in Asia, a white-flowered pubescent Spiranthes was discovered, which, based on DNA studies, was found to be distinct with respect to other known Spiranthes species (Fig. 1). It showed close affinity to S. nivea T.P Lin & W.M. Lin (Lin and Lin 2011) which is endemic to Taiwan (Fig. 1). It was also proven not to be S. sinensis (Pers.) Ames or S. spiralis (L.) Chevall. which are commonly distributed in Asia and Europe respectively (Fig. 1). Based on both morphological and genetic data, this white-flowered pubescent species is hitherto considered to be a new species that had formerly been misidentified as S. sinensis, S. spiralis or S. hongkongensis S.Y. Hu & Barretto in India and China (see Taxonomic notes). Based on sampling in southern India, North East India and South China, this species is now known to be widely distributed. Considering this as a new species, its morphological synapomorphies are enumerated here. Morphological comparisons have also been provided with allied species, S. sinensis, S. hongkongensis and S. nivea.
Figure 1.
Bayesian phylogenetic tree indicating Spiranthes himalayensis Survesw., Kumar & Mei Sun sp. nov. Sequences generated for this study are indicated in bold, specimen identification numbers and area of collection are indicated beside the species names. Bayesian probability supports are indicated at the nodes.
Methods
Morphological observations of the new species were carried out based on living plants as well as dry specimens. Measurements were made using a ruler and a micrometer. Both herbarium and fresh specimens were examined under a stereo dissecting microscope and photographs were taken with a Nikon SMZ16 stereomicroscope connected to a digital camera.
A combined dataset of nuclear ITS, chloroplast trnL-trnLF intron/intergenic spacer, trnS-trnG intergenic spacer and maturase K (matK) sequences were used for the analysis (Table 1). The sequences were generated using primers described in Dueck et al. (2014). Molecular phylogenetic analysis was performed using MrBayes version 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). One million generations of MCMC chains were run in MrBayes implementing the GTR+I+G model. Independent analysis of the nuclear and plastid markers were congruent and the combined analysis is presented here.
Table 1.
Genbank accession numbers of sequences used.
Taxonomy
Spiranthes himalayensis
Survesw., Kumar & Mei Sun sp. nov.
urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77167300-1
Figure 2.
Habitat and habit of Spiranthes himalayensis Survesw., Kumar & Mei Sun, sp. nov. A Habitat (type location) - along the bunds of paddy fields B Habit of S. himalayensis C Close-up of the inflorescence showing white coloured flowers with densely covered glandular hairs.
Figure 3.
Spiranthes himalayensis Survesw., Kumar & Mei Sun, sp. nov. A Complete plant B Inflorescence C Floral bract D Dorsal sepal E Lateral sepal F Petal G Ovary with column and labellum H Close-up showing the glandular hairs on flower and ovary I Side view of labellum J Top view of labellum K Side view of ovary with column L Front view of ovary and column M Front view of pollinarium N Side view of pollinarium. Note: The pinkish/bluish hue on petals of S. himalayensis is due to the black background in the plates while the flowers appear fully white in natural light.
Figure 4.
Comparison of morphological characters of allied species. ASpiranthes himalayensis: 1 Close-up of inflorescence 2 A flower 3 Floral bract 4 Dorsal sepal 5 Lateral sepal 6 Petal 7 Ovary with column and labellum 8 Labellum (side view) 9 Labellum (top view) 10 Close-up showing glandular hairs on labellum and ovary 11 Ovary with column (side view) 12 Ovary with column (ventral view) BS. sinensis: 1 Close-up of inflorescence 2 A flower 3 Floral bract 4 Dorsal sepal 5 Lateral sepal 6 Petal 7 Ovary with column and labellum 8 Labellum (side view) 9 Labellum (top view) 10 Ovary with column (side view) 11 Ovary with column (ventral view) CS. hongkongensis: 1 Close-up of inflorescence 2 A flower 3 Floral bract 4 Dorsal sepal 5 Lateral sepal 6 Petal 7 Ovary with column and labellum; 8. Labellum (side view) 9 Labellum (top view) 10 Close-up showing glandular hairs on labellum and ovary 11 Ovary with column (side view) 12 Ovary with column (ventral view) DS. nivea: 1. Close-up of inflorescence; 2. A flower 3 Floral bract 4 Dorsal sepal 5 Lateral sepal 6 Petal 7 Ovary with column and labellum 8 Labellum (side view) 9 Labellum (top view) 10 Close-up showing glandular hairs on labellum and ovary 11 Ovary with column (side view) 12 Ovary with column (ventral view). Note: The pinkish/bluish hue on petals of S. himalayensis, S. nivea and S. hongkongensis is due to the black background in the plates while the flowers appear fully white in natural light.
Type.
INDIA. Manipur: Ukrul district, Imphal-Jessami road, found on a paddy field on the way to Ukhrul town from Imphal, 1 May 2016. S. Surveswaran 1 (HJCB 1001) (holotype JCB!) (specimen id M1 in DNA based phylogeny, Fig. 1).
Diagnosis.
Spiranthes himalayensis Survesw., Kumar & Mei Sun sp. nov. is similar to S. hongkongensis, S. nivea and S. sinensis, but can be differentiated on the basis of its allogamous mode of reproduction from S. hongkongensis and S. nivea which are both autogamous. It can also be easily separated from S. nivea by its pubescent body. Other morphological distinctions separating this new species from S. hongkongensis, S. nivea and allogamous S. sinensis include: floral bract longer or of the same length as the ovary, petals with blunt apex, labellum width around hypochile is same as the width of epichile, epichile widely flabellate or semi-tunicate, column length equal to or more than 1.5 mm, clavate operculum attached to the column on the broader part by an arm-like extension emerging from the upper part of column and a well-developed rostellum separating the stigma from the pollinarium.
Description.
Terrestrial herbs with perennating rhizome. Plants c. 16–30 cm tall. Rhizome about 3mm in diameter. Stem erect, leaf clustered towards the base. Leaves 2 to 5 per plant, broadly linear or linear-lanceolate, 4.0–6.0 cm long, ca. 1.5cm wide, 3-veined with depression on upper surface and elevated lining underneath, spreading from the base of the stem. Inflorescence tall, up to 30 cm long, terete, pubescent, covered with glandular hairs, with 1–3 sterile bracts sheathing the peduncle, flowers spirally arranged, clustered towards the upper one-fourth of the peduncle with flowers opening from the base. Flowers widely open 0.22 × 0.26 cm wide, 0.43 cm long, pale white to pale butter-white, pubescent with glandular hairs. Bracts green, equal to or longer than the combined length of pedicel and ovary, ovate-lanceolate, 0.40–0.50 cm long, ca. 0.17 cm wide, acuminate, hairy on the outer surface, sheathing the base of flower, margin white. Dorsal sepal white, hairy towards the base, elongated-triangular, 0.35–0.40 cm long, ca. 0.10 cm wide, obtuse. Lateral sepals white, pubescent towards the base, obliquely elliptic, 0.37–0.40 cm long, 0.10 cm wide, obtuse. Petals white, pubescent towards the base, obliquely elliptic, ca. 0.37 cm long, ca. 0.07 cm wide towards the base, 0.09 cm wide towards apex, apex blunt. Labellum white, distinctly divided into hypochile and epichile with a constriction in the middle, hairy on the outer surface, ca. 0.50 cm long; hypochile concave, ca. 0.30 cm long, 0.33–0.34 cm wide, attached at the base of short foot below the column, saccate, sac 0.05 cm deep, with one semi-globular gland on each side (0.05 cm wide, 0.04 cm high), margin entire and raised upwards till the constriction; epichile semi-tunicate, flabellate, ca. 0.20 cm long, ca. 0.30 cm wide, margin undulate, slightly dentate with some papillose hairs on the front semi-tunicate part. Column green-white, obconical, quadrangular transversely quandrangular, 0.25 cm long, 0.05 cm at the base, 0.07 cm wide towards the apex, with a short foot at the base, 0.06 cm long, stigma at the apex on the lower side, green in colour, shiny, filled with viscid liquid, trapezoid shaped, broad towards base (0.08 cm), narrower towards apex (0.06 cm), 0.06 cm long. Rostellum well developed with two semi-transparent, clavate, rostellar arms projecting in the front above stigma, 0.06 cm long. Pollinarium yellow, ovate with a deep cleft, 0.22 cm long, 0.09 cm wide, narrower end at the apex while the lobes inside covered with operculum, with a ligulate viscidium at the narrower end, 0.1 cm long. Operculum yellow-brown coloured, partly embedded on the upper part of column, not free, convex, ca. 0.10 cm long, 0.06 cm wide. Ovary sessile or with inconspicuous pedicel, densely haired, fusiform, 0.20–0.25 cm long, 0.11–0.13 cm wide. Fruits obliquely clavate, ca. 0.30 cm long, 0.12 cm wide, densely pubescent with glandular hairs.
Phenology.
Flowering: March–June. Fruiting: March–July.
Habitat.
Marshy areas near mountain streams or on bunds of paddy fields (Fig. 2A) where water is stagnant. Plants were usually found growing on clayey soil along with grasses.
Etymology.
The specific name refers to the mighty Himalayan mountain range which is an important geographical feature in Asia. The samples collected for this study were not from the Himalayas. However, based on herbarium records and communication with other researchers, it is believed that this species is widespread in the lower altitudes of Himalayas. The evolutionary origin of this species and other Asian Spiranthes are to be further elucidated.
Currently known locations of distribution.
India (Karnataka, Manipur & Tamil Nadu) & China (Yunnan and most likely Hainan (see taxonomic notes for details)).
Conservation status.
Based on DNA analysis, the occurrence of Spiranthes himalayensis can be confirmed in India and China. This species is likely to be present in a much wider geographic range where it has long been misidentified (see taxonomic notes). It was not possible to assess the specimens which might have been misidentified as S. sinensis or S. spiralis across its broad distributional range. It is emphasised that the type specimen was collected in an agricultural field and other specimens were found on roadsides along mountain slopes above 1000 m in its wide distributional range. Therefore it is speculated that this species might be of least concern for conservation. However large-scale habitat loss and fragmentation of habitats in Asia might pose a threat to this species. Since a thorough assessment has not been undertaken, the conservation status of Not Evaluated (NE) has been assigned to this species as per IUCN Red List categories and criteria (2017).
Other specimens examined.
INDIA. Manipur: Ukrul district, Imphal-Jessami Road, found on paddy fields on the way to Ukhrul town, 1200 m, 1 May 2016, S. Surveswaran 1HJCB 1001 (M1-DNA specimen) (JCB); Karnataka: Chickmagalur district, near Kemmankundi, 1400 m, 14 June 2015, S. Surveswaran 4 (HJCB 0442) (C1-DNA specimen) (JCB!); Tamil Nadu: Coimbatore, near Konalar anti-poaching protection camp, Grass Hills, Valparai Range, Anaimalai Tiger Reserve, 1200 m, 13 March 2012, K. Ravikumar & A.C. Tangavelou FRLH-121312 (FRLH!). CHINA. Yunnan Province: Malipo County, Wenshan, near Xiajinchang village, 1400 m, 20 May 2016, S. Surveswaran S52.
Note.
Hairy Spiranthes have been reported very often from India, sometimes under the name of S. sinensis (Kumar and Manilal 1994, Misra 2004) and, at other times, under the name of S. spiralis (Deva and Naithani 1986, Misra 2007). Hooker (1890) also described two species of Spiranthes, S. australis (= S. sinensis) and S. autumnalis (= S. spiralis) from India. As the protologue of S. sinensis does not mention the presence or absence of hairs (Persoon 1807), there has been no clear distinction between S. sinensis and the new white flowered S. himalayensis amongst the various reports. So far, a true S. spiralis has not been found in India and the specimens treated as S. spiralis might have been S. himalayensis sp. nov. In this study, it was out of the scope to trace all specimens or vouchers of hairy Spiranthes and distinguish them from S. sinensis which could also be hairy in some natural populations.
Seidenfaden (1978) reported Spiranthes sinensis from Thailand, illustrating a hairy plant with long and stalked glands in the hypochile. This specimen is also suspected to be the new species S. himalayensis described here. Deva and Naithani (1986) reported S. sinensis and S. spiralis from northwest Himalaya, differentiating them on the basis of multiple roots; elongated, fleshy, cylindrical tubers; lanceolate leaves, present during flowering and pink flowers in the former against 2–3 roots; fleshy carrot shaped tuber; ovate leaves, absent during flowering; white or greenish-white flowers in the latter. They also illustrated S. sinensis with hairy flowers and well developed rostellum with two rostellar arms. For S. spiralis, they just gave an illustration of tubers, but we believe that this sample could also be the new species described here. They also mentioned that S. sinensis was found in two colours, pink and white. This could be the source of confusion leading to the misidentification of our new species as S. sinensis by other workers. Kumar and Manilal (1994) reported S. sinensis from Kerala, South India, stating that it is a variable species but no description was provided. Pink flowered forms of Spiranthes have not been observed in southern India, indicating an absence of the true S. sinensis in this area and the white flowered species reported as S. sinensis is also most likely to be the new species, S. himalayensis, described here. Acharya et al. (2010) recently described a new record of S. spiralis from Pokhara valley in Nepal with glandular hairs and a flowering season similar to S. himalayensis. It is suspected that this plant from Nepal could also be S. himalayensis sp. nov. but it was not possible to acquire the specimen for detailed morphological or DNA study. The morphological description in this publication would help with the correct identification of the new species, S. himalayensis in the future.
Pridgeon et al. (2003) (fig. 203.1) illustrated Spiranthes sinensis based on Pantling 107 (K) and Grierson & Long 3986 (K), showing hairy plants looking very similar to S. himalayensis sp. nov. However, the flower colour cannot be confirmed from the line drawings.
Huang et al. (2014) reported the presence of a species of Spiranthes at an altitude of about 800 m on a grassy slope of Diaoluoshan of Hainan Island, China, which they revised as S. hongkongensis from a previous misidentification as S. sinensis. However, based on the plant picture presented in Hainan Rainforest Exhibition Hall, the Hainan species looks like the new species S. himalayensis (based on floral morphology and lack of fruit set at the base of inflorescence, personal observations). Therefore it is likely that S. himalayensis might be extending its range up to Hainan Island. Genetic evidence of the occurrence of S. himalayensis in China has been obtained from a population located in Yunnan where at least two plants were consistently placed in the species clade of S. himalayensis whether nuclear ITS or chloroplast DNA was used in the data analysis (Surveswaran and Sun, unpublished).
Based on DNA studies (Fig. 1), the samples of Spiranthes himalayensis formed a distinct species clade, sister to S. nivea clade. Both S. himalayensis and S. nivea are distinct from S. sinensis which forms a large monophyletic clade including samples from a wide geographical range such as Hong Kong, Taiwan and mainland China, Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. It should be noted that S. sinensis is highly polymorphic in flower colour, varying from purple pink to white and also in the extent of hairiness, from glandular to glabrous. The distinguishing morphological features of S. sinensis include: floral bract equal to or longer than the length of ovary, petals with rounded apex, labellum width around hypochile is half of the width of epichile, epichile widely semi-tunicate, column length less than 0.5 mm long, upper part of operculum attached to column with the arm emerging from the top of column, well developed rostellum partitioning the stigma and pollinarium. On the other hand, S. hongkongensis always has white flowers with occasionally pinkish tint on the petal and glandular hairs on various parts of the plant, but its floral bract is equal to or shorter than the length of ovary, petals have rounded apex, labellum width around hypochile is equal or slightly greater than the width of epichile, epichile not tunicate, column length up to 1mm long, lower half of operculum embedded on to column, rostellum absent and pollinia lying directly above stigma rendering autogamy. In contrast, S. nivea has short papillose hairs inconspicuous to the naked eye, flower colour is always white without pinkish tint, floral bracts are much longer than the length of ovary, petals have a blunt apex, labellum width around hypochile being more than the width at epichile, epichile not being tunicate, column length almost 0.5 mm, lower half of operculum embedded in the column, rostellum absent and pollinia lying directly above stigma rendering autogamy (see Table 2).
Table 2.
Comparison of morphological characters of Spiranthes himalayensis Survesw., Kumar & Mei Sun, sp. nov., S. sinensis, S. hongkongensis and S. nivea.
| Character | Spiranthes himalayensis | Spiranthes sinensis | Spiranthes hongkongensis | Spiranthes nivea |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowering time | March to June | April to June (in Hong Kong), August to September (in India) | March to early June | April to June |
| Inflorescence | Pubescent with glandular hairs | Pubescent or sometimes glabrous | Pubescent with glandular hairs | Glabrous, but with microscopic non-glandular papillose hairs |
| Flower | White, pale white, widely open, 0.4–0.5 × 0.15 cm wide, ca. 0.43 cm long | Pink, or purple, but occasionally white, widely open, 0.19 × 0.22 cm wide, ca. 0.45 cm long | White, petals and sepals rarely pink tinged, labellum white, widely open, 0.10, 0.12 cm wide, ca. 0.38 cm long | White, tubular on lower 2/3rd, open towards the tip, 0.09 × 0.09 cm wide, ca. 0.41 cm long |
| Bract | Equal to or longer than ovary, 0.4–0.5 cm long, ca. 0.17 cm wide | Equal to or longer than ovary, 0.36 cm long, 0.14 cm wide | Equal to or shorter than ovary, ca. 0.37 cm long, 0.19 cm wide | Much longer than ovary arching over the flower, 0.49 cm long, 0.16 cm wide |
| Petal | Apex blunt | Apex rounded | Apex rounded | Apex blunt |
| Labellum | Labellum white, pubescent on the outer surface, distinctly divided into hypochile and epichile with a constriction in the middle, ca. 0. cm long; hypochile ovate, concave or saccate, ca. 0.30 cm long, 0.33–0.34 cm wide, sac 0.05 cm deep, with a pair of semi-globular gland at the base (0.05 cm wide, 0.04 cm high), margin entire and raised upwards till the constriction, two broad pale green patch at the constriction; epichile semi-tunicate, flabellate, ca. 0.20 cm long, ca. 0.30 cm wide, margin undulate, slightly dentate with some papillose hairs on the front semi-tunicate part | Labellum pink or white, glabrous, not distinct into epichile and hypochile due to lack of constriction, rather a semi-cylindrical basal portion with tunicate or flabellate frontal portion, 0.46 cm long; basal portion 0.15 cm wide, 0.23 cm long, saccate, sac 0.03 cm deep, margin raised with a pair of semi-globular glands at the base (0.05 cm wide, 0.05 cm high), margin smooth towards base, undulate from almost middle of the basal portion to the whole length of frontal portion; frontal portion semi-tunicate or flabellate, 0.13cm long, 0.16 cm wide at base, 0.35 cm wide towards the apex, margin undulate, slightly dentate | Labellum white with rare pinkish tinge, distinctly divided into hypochile and epichile with a constriction in the middle, ca. 0.58 cm long; hypochile ovate, slightly concave or saccate, 0.26 cm long, 0.32 cm wide, 0.06 cm deep, with a pair of trapezoidal shaped gland at the base (0.09 cm wide, 0.07 cm high), margin entire and raised upwards till the constriction; no colour patch at the constriction; epichile semi-tunicate, flabellate, ca. 0.26 cm long, ca. 0.26 cm wide, margin undulate, slightly dentate, glabrous |
Labellum white, glabrous, not distinct into epichile and hypochile due to lack of constriction, rather a semi-conical basal portion with semi-cylindric frontal portion, 0.43cm long; basal portion 0.24 cm wide towards base, 0.14 cm wide towards upper part, 0.24 cm long, saccate, sac 0.03 cm deep, margin raised with a pair of semi- globose glands at the base (0.04 cm wide, 0.04 cm high), margin smooth till the base of frontal part of labellum; frontal portion not widely spreading, margin convolute, 0.19 cm long, 0.16 cm wide at base, 0.14 cm wide towards the apex, margin undulate towards base and slightly dentate towards apex |
| Labellum apex | Recurved, > 270 degrees | Strongly recurved, almost 360 degrees | Recurved by < 270 degrees | Recurved by < 270 degrees |
| Column | Column, obconical, 0.25 cm long, 0.05 cm at the base, 0.07 cm wide towards the apex; foot 0.06 cm long; stigma trapezoid shaped, broad towards base (0.08 cm), narrower towards apex (0.06 cm), 0.06 cm long. | Column conical, 0.23 cm long, 0.08 cm wide at the base, 0.10 cm wide at the apex; foot 0.05 cm long; stigma almost semicircular in shape, 0.09 cm wide | Column, obconical, 0.21 cm long, 0.07 cm at the base, 0.09 cm wide towards the apex; foot 0.05 cm long; stigma crescent or semicircular shaped, 0.08 cm wide | Column obconical. 0.12 cm long, 0.04 cm wide at base, 0.05 cm wide towards apex; foot 0.04 cm long; stigma semicircular in shape, 0.05 cm wide |
| Operculum attachment on column | An inconspicuously separating arm on the top of column attached to the front broader part of operculum | An extension from the upper part of column protruding out and attached to the top of operculum | Broader front of operculum embedded in the column (no extension projecting from column on to operculum) | Almost half of the broader part of operculum embedded on to the top of the column (no extension projecting from column on to operculum) |
| Rostellum | Well developed with two semi-transparent, clavate, rostellar arms projecting in the front above stigma, 0.06 cm long. | Well developed with two semi-transparent, clavate, rostellar arms projecting in the front above stigma, 0.05 cm long | Not visible or absent | Not visible or absent |
| Pollination | Allogamous | Allogamous | Autogamous (due to lack of rostellum, pollinia falls on the stigma on its own) | Autogamous (due to lack of rostellum, pollinia falls on the stigma on its own) |
Based on preliminary chromosome counts, Spiranthes himalayensis and S. nivea both have a diploid chromosome number of about 30, similar to S. sinensis. It has been confirmed that S. hongkongensis is an allotetraploid (4× = 60), with S. sinensis as its maternal progenitor (Sun 1996, Chen and Sun 1998) and most likely the new species S. himalayensis as its paternal progenitor (Surveswaran and Sun, unpublished). S. hongkongensis was not included in the phylogeny because it is a well-known allotetraploid (Sun 1996) and sequencing of cloned ITS sequences of S. hongkongensis to identify the paternal and maternal progenitors of this species has been performed (Surveswaran and Sun, unpublished).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank, Joy Horam for field assistance, Professor Suhua Shi for help with Yunnan samples and Dr. K. Ravikumar (FRLHT, India) for providing some information on new occurrences. This work was supported by a HKRGC grant (GRF-17101616) and a CRCG grant (201511159168) to Mei Sun.
Citation
Surveswaran S, Kumar P, Sun M (2017) Spiranthes himalayensis (Orchidaceae, Orchidoideae) a new species from Asia. PhytoKeys 89: 115–128. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.89.19978
References
- Acharya KP, Wood JJ, Berwian R, Sharma A. (2010) Spiranthes spiralis (Orchidaceae), A new record for the Nepal Himalaya. Harvard Papers in Botany 15: 71–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3100/025.015.0121 [Google Scholar]
- Chen H, Sun M. (1998) Consensus multiplex PCR–Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) for rapid detection of plant mitochondrial DNA polymorphism. Molecular Ecology 7: 1553–1556. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00476.x [Google Scholar]
- Chen X, Gale SW, Cribb PJ. (2009) Spiranthes. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY. (Eds) Flora of China 25 (Orchidaceae). Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 84–86.
- Deva S, Naithani HB. (1986) The Orchid Flora of North West Himalayas. Print and Media Associate, New Delhi, 459 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Dueck LA, Aygoren D, Cameron KM. (2014) A molecular framework for understanding the phylogeny of Spiranthes (Orchidaceae), a cosmopolitan genus with a North American center of diversity. American Journal of Botany 101: 1551–1571. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Govaerts R, Campacci MA, Baptista DH, Cribb PJ, George A, Kreutz K, Wood JJ. (2017) World Checklist of Orchidaceae http://www.kew.org/wcsp/monocots [Electronic version accessed on 20 April 2017]
- Hooker JD. (1890) Spiranthes In: Flora of British India 6. Ashford, Kent, 02–103.
- Huang MZ, Wand QL, Liu ZL, Yang GS. (2014) Miscellaneous notes on Orchidaceae from Hainan (II). Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture 34: 61–64. [Google Scholar]
- IUCN (2017) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. Second Edition. http://www.iucnredlist.org/ [accessed on 27 September 2017]
- Kumar CS, Manilal KS. (1994) A Catalogue of Indian Orchids. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, 162 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Lin TP, Lin WM. (2011) Newly discovered native orchids of Taiwan (IV). Taiwania 56(4): 315–322. http://tai2.ntu.edu.tw/taiwania/pdf/tai.2011.56.315.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Misra S. (2004) Orchids of Orissa. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, 774 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Misra S. (2007) Orchids of India: A glimpse. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, 402 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Persoon CH. (1807) Synopsis plantarum, seu Enchiridium botanicum, complectens enumerationem systematicam specierum hucusque cognitarum. Parisiis Lutetiorum, C.F. Cramerum, 656 pp https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.638 [Google Scholar]
- Pridgeon AM, Cribb PJ, Chase MW, Rasmussen FN. (2003) Genera Orchidacearum 3: Orchidoideae (Part 2). Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 358 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Richard LC. (1817) De Orchideis Europaeisannotationes, praesertim ad genera dilucidandaspectantes. Ex typ. A. Belin, Parisiis, 152 pp. [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seidenfaden G. (1978) Orchid genera in Thailand VI: Neottioideae Lindl. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv 32: 1–195. [Google Scholar]
- Sun M. (1996) The allopolyploid origin of Spiranthes hongkongensis (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 252–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445944 [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X, Cheng Z, Liu Q, Zhang J, Hu A, Huang M, Hu C, Tian H. (2016) An updated checklist of Orchidaceae for China, with two new national records. Phytotaxa 276: 1–148. https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.276.1.1 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.