Skip to main content
European Journal of Rheumatology logoLink to European Journal of Rheumatology
. 2017 Nov 2;4(4):250–253. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2017.17044

ABO blood groups and rheumatic diseases

Songül Çildağ 1,, Yasemin Kara 1, Taşkın Şentürk 1
PMCID: PMC5741336  PMID: 29308278

Abstract

Objective

Various genetic and environmental risk factors have been shown to be associated with the incidence of rheumatic diseases. However, the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases poorly understood. Several studies have shown associations of ABO blood groups with various diseases. Our study aimed to determine whether there is an association between the types of rheumatic diseases and ABO and Rh blood groups.

Material and Methods

The study included the patients, followed up at the Immunology-Rheumatology clinic between January 2016 and December 2016 for diagnosis of rheumatic disease, who had an ABO Rh blood data. Age, gender, type of rheumatic disease, ABO Rh blood groups were recorded.

Results

When 823 patients were assessed for blood types, 42.5% patients had A type, 33.2% had O type, 15.4% had B type, and 8.9% had AB type. There was significant difference in the distribution of blood types in rheumatic diseases. While SpA, vasculitis, UCTD, Behçet’s and RA were more common in the patients with A blood type; FMF, SLE, SSc and SjS were more common in the patients with O blood type. In addition, the blood type where all the diseases are observed the least commonly was AB. There was significant difference in the distribution of Rh factor in rheumatic diseases. 92.2% patients were Rh positive and 7.8% patients were Rh negative.

Conclusion

In our study, we thought that the higher incidence of different rheumatic diseases in different blood types was associated with different genetic predisposition.

Keywords: ABO blood group, rheumatic diseases, rh factor

Introduction

Although various blood group systems have been described based on different blood group antigens, in clinical practice, the relevant blood group systems are ABO and Rhesus. The ABO blood group system consists of four basic groups, namely A, B, AB, and O, depending on the presence of the A and B antigens. These antigens are controlled by three allelic A, B, and O genes located on the long arm of chromosome 9 (1). The blood groups in the Rhesus system are classified as Rh− and Rh+, depending on the presence of the Rhesus D antigen located on the red blood cell surface. Rh antigens are coded by three pairs of allele genes on chromosome 1. The major antigen of this group is Rho(D) (2). Although the entire human population shares similar ABO and Rh blood groups, the frequency and distribution of the blood groups vary among nationalities and races (3). The distribution of ABO blood groups worldwide is O>A>B>AB, whereas it is A>O>B>AB and Rh+>Rh− in Turkey (410).

The association of ABO and Rh blood groups with various diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular disorders, infections, and diabetes mellitus, has been demonstrated (1114).

Our study aimed to determine whether there is an association between types of rheumatic diseases and the ABO and Rh blood groups.

Material and Methods

The study included patients followed up at the Immunology-Rheumatology clinic in Aydın (Turkey) between January 2016 and December 2016 because of the diagnosis of a rheumatic disease and with ABO and Rh blood group data. Patient files were examined; age, gender, types of rheumatic diseases, and ABO and Rh blood groups were recorded. For this retrospective study, approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee for Non-invasive Clinical Studies at the Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine (No: 2017/1061). As this study was retrospectively designed, there was no requirement of informed consent forms.

Statistical evaluation

The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 18.0 software (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical evaluation of data. Data are presented as mean±standard derivation and percentage. The chi-square test was used for investigating the correlation between the types of rheumatic diseases and blood groups. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

In the study, the mean age of the patients was 48.44±14.8 years; a total of 823 patients, including 581 (70.6%) female and 242 (29.4%) male patients, were examined. There were nine types of diseases, including spondyloarthropathy (SpA), vasculitis, undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), Behçet’s diseases, familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In total, 350 (42.5%) patients had blood group A type, 273 (33.2%) had O type, 127 (15.4%) had B type, and 73 (8.9%) had AB type. There was significant difference in the distribution of blood types in rheumatic diseases. While SpA, vasculitis, UCTD, Behçet’s disease, and RA were more common in the patients with the A blood type, FMF, SLE, SSc and SjS were more common in the patients with the O blood type. In addition, the blood type where all the diseases were observed the least commonly was AB blood type (Table 1).

Table 1.

Frequency of ABO blood groups in cases of rheumatic diseases

n O A B AB

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Significance
SpA 149 18.10 37 24.80 70 47.00 28 18.80 14 9.40
Vasculitis 33 4.00 9 27.30 19 57.60 2 6.10 3 9.10
UCTD 41 5.00 16 39.00 22 53.70 2 4.90 1 2.40
Behçet’s disease 36 4.40 10 27.80 12 33.30 9 25.00 5 13.90 χ2=56.404
FMF 54 6.60 25 46.30 12 22.20 12 22.20 5 9.30 df=24
SLE 93 11.30 44 47.30 30 32.30 10 10.80 9 9.70 p=.000
SSc 49 6.00 23 46.90 14 28.60 8 16.30 4 8.20
SjS 50 6.10 17 34.00 15 30.00 9 18.00 9 18.00
RA 318 38.60 92 28.90 156 49.10 47 14.80 23 7.20
Total 823 100 273 33.2 350 42.5 127 15.4 73 8.9

SpA: spondyloarthropathy; UCTD: undifferentiated connective tissue disease; FMF: Familial Mediterranean fever; SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc: systemic sclerosis; SjS: Sjögren’s syndrome; RA: rheumatoid arthritis

There was significant difference in the distribution of Rh factor in rheumatic diseases. In total, 759 (92.2%) patients were Rh positive and 64 (7.8%) patients were Rh negative (Table 2).

Table 2.

Frequency of Rh factor in cases of rheumatic diseases

Rh− Rh+ Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Significance
SpA 11 7.40 138 92.60 149 100 χ2 p
Vasculitis 1 3.00 32 97.00 33 100
UCTD 2 4.90 39 95.10 41 100
Behçet’s disease 4 11.10 32 88.90 36 100
FMF 4 7.40 50 92.60 54 100
SLE 4 4.30 89 95.70 93 100 47.38 .000
SSc 6 12.20 43 87.80 49 100
SjS 3 6.00 47 94.00 50 100
RA 29 9.10 289 90.90 318 100
Total 64 7.80 759 92.20 823 100

Rh: rhesus; SpA: spondyloarthropathy; UCTD: undifferentiated connective tissue disease; FMF: Familial Mediterranean fever; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc: systemic sclerosis; SjS: Sjögren’s syndrome; RA: rheumatoid arthritis

In terms of the distribution by the ABO blood groups, the O blood type had SLE, SSc, and FMF at the highest rate; the A blood type had vasculitis, UCTD, RA, and SpA at the highest rate; the B blood type had Behçet’s disease and FMF at the highest rate; and the AB blood type had SjS at the highest rate (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Segregation of diseases according to ABO blood groups

Discussion

In our study, the most common blood type in all the rheumatic diseases was A, followed by O, B, and AB. Our study does not have data for the normal population, and the distribution of blood types for the normal population in other studies conducted in Turkey is A>O>B>AB and Rh+>Rh− (510). Generally, the blood type distribution in rheumatic diseases appears to be the same as the normal population. Considering the type of rheumatic disease, the distribution of blood groups for RA, SpA, vasculitis, UCTD, and Behçet’s disease is A>O>B>AB, which appears to be the same as that in the normal population. The most common blood type for FMF, SLE, SSc, and SjS is type O, followed by A, B, and AB. Also, in our study, the rate of Rh factor positivity is higher in all the diseases groups.

In the literature, studies investigating the association of RA and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with blood types are available, and similar to our study, the most common blood type in both diseases has shown to be A and the least common blood type has been shown to be AB (15, 16). In the literature, we found a study investigating the relationship between Behçet’s disease and blood types, wherein no significant difference with the control group was detected, and blood types O and A were found to be more common at similar rates (10). In a study of discoid lupus, blood type A was found to be at a higher rate, which was followed by blood types O, B Please use consistent font formats for column headings in Tables 1 and 2. Similarly, use uniform alignment for row headings for the tables, and AB (17). In our study, all patients were followed up because of the diagnosis of SLE. In these patients, blood type O was positive at a higher rate, which was followed by blood types A, B, and AB.

In the literature, there were no studies investigating the association between SSc, SjS, and SLE and blood types. In our study, we found that the blood type O was the most common in all three groups of connective tissue disorders, followed by blood types A, B, and AB. Further, we did not find a study of FMF, an autoinflammatory disease, in the literature, and in our study, blood type A was found to be the most common in FMF patients.

In our study, an interesting finding was that blood type A was found to be at the highest rate in patients with RA and AS with erosive arthritis, which are the most common rheumatic diseases, and blood type O was found to be at the highest rate in patients with SLE, SSc, and SjS, which are among the connective tissue disorders frequently observed with antinuclear antibodies. The reason for this could be the difference in the genetic characteristics of the diseases.

Various genetic and environmental risk factors have been shown to be associated with the incidence of rheumatic diseases (18, 19). Studies on genetic and environmental risk factors in rheumatic diseases have been conducted in patients with RA owing to its partially homogeneous disease phenotype and high prevalence (20). In major histocompatibility complex, the polymorphism of the three human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes (HLA-DRB1, HLA-DP1, and HLA-B) is highly related to RA (21). As in RA and other autoimmune diseases, HLA genes are thought to have a central role in the predisposition to SLE. HLA-DRB1*03:01 and *15:01 haplotypes have been described as strong genetic risk factors for SLE in the European population (18). Different from other rheumatic diseases, the genetic relationship has been largely described in AS patients, and the rate of HLA-B27 positivity is known to be approximately 90% in these patients (22, 23). Although the genetic mechanism cannot be thoroughly explained in all patients, there is a strong relationship between Behçet’s disease and HLA-B51 (24).

It has been demonstrated that the genetic markers of autosomal recessive FMF are associated with HLA-DR4 alleles and that HLA-DR levels increase during attacks compared to those in controls; studies have described the association between FMF and HLA-DR (25, 26).

In SSc, some alleles on HLA-DRB1, DQB1, DPB1, and DPB2 have been shown to be risk factors for the disease (2730). The association between HLA DR-2 and DR-3 has been described, and in subsequent studies of SjS, the haplotypes DRB1* 0301 (HLA DR-3), DQB1 *0201, and DRB1*1501(DR-2) have been shown to be associated with the disease (31).

The strongest HLA association with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis has been shown to be with HLA DPB1 (32).

The ABO blood groups are clinically practicable parameters for performing genetic assessments. In our study, we believe that the higher incidence of different rheumatic diseases in different blood types is associated with different genetic predispositions.

Footnotes

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the ethics committee of Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine (No: 2017/1061).

Informed Consent: As this study was retrospectively designed, there was no requirement of informed consent forms.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Concept - S.Ç., T.Ş.; Design - S.Ç., Y.K., T.Ş.; Supervision - S.Ç., T.Ş.; Resources - S.Ç.; Materials - S.Ç.; Data Collection and/or Processing - S.Ç., Y.K., T.Ş.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - S.Ç., T.Ş.; Literature Search - S.Ç., Y.K.; Writing Manuscript - S.Ç., Y.K., T.Ş.; Critical Review - S.Ç., T.Ş.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

  • 1.Eastlund T. The histo-blood group ABO system and tissue transplantation. Transfusion. 2003;38:975–88. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.381098440863.x. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.381098440863.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Behra D, Joshi D. Distribution of ABO blood group and RH (D) factor in Western Rajasthan. J Med Res. 2013;3:73–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Donbak L, Rencuzogullari E, Topaktas M, Kayrın L. Detection of some blood group (ABO, RH-D) and serum protein (HP, a1-AT, TF) polymorphisms in Antakya Province, Turkey. T Klin J Med Res. 2002;20:109–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guyton AC, Hall JE. Blood Types; Transfusion; Tissue and Organ Transplantation. In: Guyton AC, Hall JE, editors. Textbook of Medical Physiology. Eleventh Edition. Philadelphia: 2006. pp. 452–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Doğan E, Sevimligül G, Çelik C, Şencan M. Blood group distribution of donors and patients admitted to the Blood and Transfusion Center of Cumhuriyet University Hospital. CMJ. 2015;37:23–29. https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.v37i1.5000071839. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Salduz ZIY, Çetin G, Karatoprak C, Ozder A, Bilginç M, Gültepe I, et al. ABO and Rh Blood Group Distribution in İstanbul Province (Turkey) İstanbul Med J. 2015;16:98–100. https://doi.org/10.5152/imj.2015.14890. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Balcı Y, Ovet G, Covut İE, Goncu F, Yılmaz M. ABO and Rh blood groups frequency in Denizli province. UHOD. 2010;2:103–5. https://doi.org/10.4999/uhod.09141. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Temiz H, Altıntaş A, Gül K. Distrubition of ABO and Rh Blood Groups in Diyarbakır. UHOD. 2008:234–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dilek İ, Demir C, Bay A, Akdeniz H, Öner AF. ABO and Rh blood groups frequency in men and women living in eastern Turkey. UHOD. 2006:23–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ozyurt K, Oztürk P, Gül M, Benderli YC, Çölgeçen E, Inci R. ABO blood groups, Rhesus factor, and Behçet’s disease. Acta Dermatovenerol APA |. 2013;22:63–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rummel Seth K, Ellsworth Rachel E. The role of the histoblood ABO group in cancer. Future Sci OA. 2016;2:FSO107. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2015-0012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Franchini M, Favaloro EJ, Targher G, Lippi G. ABO blood group, hypercoagulability, and cardiovascular and cancer risk. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2012;49:137–49. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2012.708647. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408363.2012.708647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Panda AK, Panda SK, Sahu AN, Tripathy R, Ravindran B, Das BK. Association of ABO blood group with severe falciparum malaria in adults: case control study and meta-analysis. Malar J. 2011;10:309. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-309. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meo SA, Rouq FA, Suraya F, Zaıdı SZ. Association of ABO and Rh blood groups with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20:237–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stoıa I, Ramneantu R, Poıtas M. Blood groups ABO and Rh (D) factor in the rheumatıc dıseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1967;26:332–33. doi: 10.1136/ard.26.4.332. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.26.4.332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shinebaum Ruht. ABO Blood group and secretor status in the spondyloarthropathies. FEMS Microbiology Immunology. 1989;47:389–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb02426.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb02426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Almeida Tamega Andreia, da Silva Pinto Bezerra Lilian Valeria Guerra, de Paula Pereira Fabiola, Miot Helio Amante. Blood groups and discoid lupus erythematosus. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:477–81. doi: 10.1590/s0365-05962009000500005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sparks Jeffrey A, Costenbader Karen H. Genetics, environment, and gene-environment interactions in the development of systemic rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2014;40:637–57. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2014.07.005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2014.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Van Steenbergen HW, Huizinga TW, van der Helm-van Mil AH. The preclinical phase of rheumatoid arthritis: what is acknowledged and what needs to be assessed? Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:2219–32. doi: 10.1002/art.38013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Raychaudhuri S, Sandor C, Stahl EA, Freudenberg J, Lee HS, Jia X, et al. Five amino acids in three HLA proteins explain most of the association between MHC and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet. 2012;44:291–96. doi: 10.1038/ng.1076. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okada Y, Wu D, Trynka G, Raj T, Terao C, Ikari K, et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature. 2014;506:376–81. doi: 10.1038/nature12873. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schlosstein L, Terasaki PI, Bluestone R, Pearson CM. High association of an HL-A antigen, W27, with ankylosing spondylitis. N Engl J Med. 1973;288:704–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197304052881403. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197304052881403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Reveille JD. Genetics of spondyloarthritis--beyond the MHC. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(5):296–304. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2012.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chambrun MP, Wechsler B, Geri G, Cacoub P, Saadoun D. New insights into the pathogenesis of Behçet’s disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11:687–98. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Musabak U, Sengul A, Oktenli C, Pay S, Yesilova Z, Kenar L, et al. Does immune activation continue during an attack-free period in familial Mediterranean fever? Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;138:526–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02632.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kınıklı G, Bektaş M, Mısırlıoğlu M, Ateş A, Turgay M, Tuncer S, et al. Relationship between HLA-DR, HLA-DQ alleles and MEFV gene mutations in familial mediterranean fever (FMF) patients. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2005;16:143–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Assassi S, Radstake TR, Mayes MD, Martin J. Genetics of scleroderma: implications for personalized medicine? BMC Med. 2013;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Radstake TR, Gorlova O, Rueda B, Martin JE, Alizadeh BZ, Palomino-Morales R, et al. Genome-wide association study of systemic sclerosis identifies CD247 as a new susceptibility locus. Nat Genet. 2010;42:426–29. doi: 10.1038/ng.565. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Allanore Y, Saad M, Dieude P, Avouac J, Distler JH, Amouyel P, et al. Genome-wide scan identifies TNIP1, PSORS1C1, and RHOB as novel risk loci for systemic sclerosis. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:7.e1002091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mayes MD, Bossini-Castillo L, Gorlova O, et al. Immunochip analysis identifies multiple susceptibility loci for systemic sclerosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:47–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.12.002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cobb BL, Lessard CJ, Harley JB, Moser KL. Genes and Sjögren’s Syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2008;34:847–68. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2008.08.003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alberici F, Martorana D, Vaglio A. Genetic aspects of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:37–45. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Journal of Rheumatology are provided here courtesy of AVES

RESOURCES