Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology logoLink to Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
. 2017 Dec 19;5:114. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2017.00114

The Multifaceted Role of the Lysosomal Protease Cathepsins in Kidney Disease

Pasquale Cocchiaro 1,2,3,4,5,, Valeria De Pasquale 1,, Rossella Della Morte 6, Simona Tafuri 6, Luigi Avallone 6, Anne Pizard 2,3,4,5, Anna Moles 7,*, Luigi Michele Pavone 1,*
PMCID: PMC5742100  PMID: 29312937

Abstract

Kidney disease is worldwide the 12th leading cause of death affecting 8–16% of the entire population. Kidney disease encompasses acute (short-lasting episode) and chronic (developing over years) pathologies both leading to renal failure. Since specific treatments for acute or chronic kidney disease are limited, more than 2 million people a year require dialysis or kidney transplantation. Several recent evidences identified lysosomal proteases cathepsins as key players in kidney pathophysiology. Cathepsins, originally found in the lysosomes, exert important functions also in the cytosol and nucleus of cells as well as in the extracellular space, thus participating in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes. Based on their catalytic active site residue, the 15 human cathepsins identified up to now are classified in three different families: serine (cathepsins A and G), aspartate (cathepsins D and E), or cysteine (cathepsins B, C, F, H, K, L, O, S, V, X, and W) proteases. Specifically in the kidney, cathepsins B, D, L and S have been shown to regulate extracellular matrix homeostasis, autophagy, apoptosis, glomerular permeability, endothelial function, and inflammation. Dysregulation of their expression/activity has been associated to the onset and progression of kidney disease. This review summarizes most of the recent findings that highlight the critical role of cathepsins in kidney disease development and progression. A better understanding of the signaling pathways governed by cathepsins in kidney physiopathology may yield novel selective biomarkers or therapeutic targets for developing specific treatments against kidney disease.

Keywords: cathepsins, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, lysosomal proteases, signaling pathways

Introduction

Kidneys are complex organs whose excretory, biosynthetic and metabolic activities are essential for healthy living. They regulate body fluid balance, blood pressure, waste removal, and red blood cells production (Preuss, 1993; Adamson, 1996). Kidney functions take place through mechanisms of filtration, reabsorption and secretion occurring in the nephrons, the basic structural and functional units of the kidney (Figure 1). Nephron components filter the blood free of cells and large proteins, producing an ultrafiltrate composed of the other smaller circulating elements. The ultrafiltrate enters tubule segments to produce the final urine by removing (reabsorption) or adding (secretion) substances from or to the tubular fluid (Gueutin et al., 2012; Mount, 2014). Indeed, by adapting the quality composition of urine to the needs of the body, kidneys keep the organism in balance of water, hydrogen ion concentration, electrolytes, and minerals, and eliminate the toxic substances produced in the body. Deregulation of kidney functions may lead to severe pathological conditions affecting different tissues and organs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Nephron segments and their main physiological function. The nephron is the functional unit of the kidney and is composed by the renal corpuscle and the renal tubule. In the renal corpuscle, the glomerular filtrate is generated by filtration of water, ions, and small molecules from the bloodstream. The glomerular filtrate is transformed into urine by reabsorption and secretion of different molecules through the different sections of the renal tubule (proximal convoluted tubule, loop of Henle, and distal convoluted tubule) and the collecting duct system. Kidney and nephron image adapted from Smart Servier Medical Art under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Kidney diseases are worldwide the 12th leading cause of death and the 17th cause for loss of healthy life years (Glassock et al., 2017). They are classified into two major groups of pathologies depending on the length of the disease encompassing acute kidney injury (AKI), which is an abrupt reduction of kidney functions within 48 hours (Mehta et al., 2007; Rewa and Bagshaw, 2014), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) that is a gradual loss of renal function over years (Jha et al., 2013; Hill et al., 2016). AKI is associated with an high mortality rate (30–70%) and can have long-term consequences predisposing to CKD development (Coca et al., 2009). Due to the lack of adequate specific treatments, many patients (>2 millions worldwide) progress from CKD to end-stage renal disease and organ failure, requiring dialysis, or kidney transplantation (Hu and Coresh, 2017). Management of AKI and CKD represents a massive burden for the health care systems (Kerr et al., 2014), and CKD is on the rise due to the aging of the population and the clinical complications associated with diabetes and hypertension (Jobs et al., 2011; Tonelli and Riella, 2014). Therefore, there is an urgent need to increase our understanding on kidney disease pathogenesis to find new selective biomarkers or therapeutic candidates for drug development.

In this scenario, emerging evidence demonstrate the important role for lysosomal proteases cathepsins (Cts) in the onset and progression of kidney disease (Svara et al., 2010; Moallem et al., 2011; Ozkayar et al., 2015; Cocchiaro et al., 2016; Fox et al., 2016; Yamamoto-Nonaka et al., 2016; Conley et al., 2017). Lysosomes are ubiquitous organelles responsible for the catabolism and recycling of different types of macromolecules and constitute the major degradative compartment of the cell (Cuervo and Dice, 1998). They are involved in the renal epithelial molecular machinery underlying kidney physiology (Surendran et al., 2014). Two classes of proteins mediate lysosomal activity: integral lysosomal membrane proteins and soluble lysosomal hydrolases.

Among hydrolases, Cts are implicated in multiple cellular processes ranging from the processing of proteins and hormones to the regulation of cell cycle, autophagy, cell death, and immune response (Ciechanover, 2012). Altered expression and/or activity of Cts have been associated with a variety of human diseases (Reiser et al., 2010; Pišlar and Kos, 2014; Stoka et al., 2016). Since a growing number of studies deals with the involvement of Cts in kidney physiopathology, this review aims to highlight the most recent advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which lysosomal Cts promote kidney disease.

Proteases cathepsins

To date more than 20 types of Cts have been identified in animals, plants, and microorganisms. In humans, 15 types of Cts have been reported, which can be classified into 3 distinct groups based on the amino acid that comprises the active site residue: serine (Cts A and G), cysteine (Cts B, C, H, F, L, K, O, S, V, X, W), and aspartate proteases (Cts D and E) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Classification, tissue localization and disease involvement of human cathepsins.

Cat. Protease family Aminoacids Localization Disease involvement
A Ser 480 Brain, skin, placenta, liver, kidney, platelets
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis (Pereira et al., 2016)

  • Sialidosis (d'Azzo et al., 2015)

  • Cardiomyopathies (Hua and Nair, 2015)

B Cys 339 Liver, kidney, spleen, thyroid
  • Alzheimer's disease. (Schechter and Ziv, 2011)

  • Atheriosclerosis (Hua and Nair, 2015)

  • Cancer and metastasis (Gocheva and Joyce, 2007)

  • Inflammatory lung disease (Zhang et al., 2015)

  • Neurodegenerative disorders (Stoka et al., 2016)

  • Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis (Pozgan et al., 2010)

  • Kidney disease (Senatorski et al., 1998; Tao et al., 2005; Svara et al., 2010; Peres et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2015; Musante et al., 2015; Fox et al., 2016; Lim et al., 2016; Scarpioni et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Conley et al., 2017)

C Cys 463 Liver, lung, kidney, spleen, gut, placenta, T lymphocytes
  • Papillon-Lefèvre and Haim-Munk syndromes (Rai et al., 2010)

  • Diabetes (Korpos et al., 2013)

  • Inflammatory lung disease (Hamon et al., 2016)

  • Neurodegenerative disorders (Stoka et al., 2016)

  • Squamous tumors (Ruffell et al., 2013)

D Asp 412 Spleen, kidney, liver, platelets
  • Atheriosclerosis (Hua and Nair, 2015)

  • Cancer (Benes et al., 2008)

  • Neurodegenerative disorders (Stoka et al., 2016)

  • Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (Benes et al., 2008)

  • Obesity (Hua and Nair, 2015)

  • Kidney disease (Moallem et al., 2011; Ozkayar et al., 2015; Cocchiaro et al., 2016; Fox et al., 2016; Yamamoto-Nonaka et al., 2016)

E Asp 401 Brain, gut, skin, spleen, lung, kidney, lymph nodes, erythrocytes, adipocytes
  • Alzheimer's disease (Mackay et al., 1997)

  • Cancer (Abd-Elgaliel et al., 2013; Kawakubo et al., 2014)

  • Rosai-Dorfman disease (Paulli et al., 1994)

F Cys 484 Brain, heart, skeletal muscle, testis, ovary, kidney, macrophages
  • Cancer (Vazquez-Ortiz et al., 2005; Ji et al., 2017)

  • Kufs-disease (Peters et al., 2015)

  • Neurodegenerative disorders (Stoka et al., 2016)

G Ser 225 Skin, kidney, monocytes, neutrophils
  • Atheriosclerosis (Rafatian et al., 2013)

  • Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (Herrmann et al., 2001)

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, cystic fibrosis (Kosikowska and Lesner, 2013)

  • Papillon-Lefevre syndrome (Korkmaz et al., 2010)

  • Glomerulonephritis and renal failure (Johnson et al., 1988; Sanders et al., 2004; Shimoda et al., 2007; Cohen-Mazor et al., 2014)

H Cys 335 Liver, kidney, spleen
  • Cancer and metastasis (Gocheva and Joyce, 2007)

  • Inflammatory lung disease (Bunatova et al., 2009)

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (Jørgensen et al., 2011)

K Cys 329 Lung, osteoclasts, macrophages, embryonic epithelial gastrointestinal cells, respiratory and urinary tracts
  • Atherosclerosis and obesity (Lafarge et al., 2010)

  • Cardiac hypertrophy (Hua and Nair, 2015)

  • Cancer (Husmann et al., 2008)

  • Inflammatory lung disease (van den Brûle et al., 2005)

  • Osteoarthritis (Saftig et al., 1998)

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (Hao et al., 2015)

L Cys 333 Liver, thyroid, kidney, macrophages
  • Alzheimer's disease (Schechter and Ziv, 2011)

  • Neurodegenerative disorders (Stoka et al., 2016)

  • Atherosclerosis and obesity (Lafarge et al., 2010; reviewed in Hua and Nair, 2015)

  • Diabetes (Huang et al., 2003)

  • Cancer and metastasis (Sudhan and Siemann, 2015)

  • Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis (Solau-Gervais et al., 2007)

  • Kidney disease (Cohen and Kretzler, 2003; Goulet et al., 2004; Reiser et al., 2004; Sever et al., 2007; Bauer et al., 2011; Haase et al., 2014; Sołtysiak et al., 2014; Carlsson et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015; Garsen et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2017)

O Cys 321 Liver, kidney, ovary, placenta
  • Breast cancer (Cairns et al., 2017)

S Cys 331 Spleen, lymph nodes, heart
  • Alzheimer's disease (Schechter and Ziv, 2011)

  • Atherosclerosis and obesity (Jormsjö et al., 2002; Lafarge et al., 2010; Hua and Nair, 2015)

  • Diabetes (Jobs et al., 2013; Korpos et al., 2013)

  • Cancer and metastasis (Gocheva and Joyce, 2007)

  • Inflammatory lung disease (Bunatova et al., 2009)

  • Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis (Pozgan et al., 2010)

  • Kidney disease (Luhe et al., 2003; Aikawa et al., 2009; Carlsson et al., 2015; Figueiredo et al., 2015; Steubl et al., 2017)

V Cys 334 Cornea, thymus, testis, liver, heart, kidney, colon, T lymphocytes
  • Atheriosclerosis (Yasuda et al., 2004)

  • Cardiovascular disorders (Keegan et al., 2012; Leng et al., 2017)

  • Neurological diseases (Funkelstein et al., 2012)

  • Pulmonary sarcoidosis (Naumnik et al., 2015)

  • Systemic sclerosis (Noda et al., 2013)

W Cys 376 Spleen, lymph nodes, liver, heart, kidney
  • Leukemia (Kothapalli et al., 2003)

  • Diabetes (Korpos et al., 2013)

  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease (Raab et al., 2011)

  • Inflammatory bowel disease or autoimmune gastritis (Buhling et al., 2002)

X Cys 303 Liver, kidney, placenta, lung, heart, colon
  • Neuroinflammation and multiple sclerosis (Stoka et al., 2016; Allan et al., 2017)

  • Cancer and metastasis (Nägler et al., 2004; Krueger et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2011)

Mainly localized in the lysosomes where their activity is facilitated by the lysosomal acidic environment, under certain circumstances, Cts can also be found in the intracellular and extracellular spaces (Stoka et al., 2001, 2005, 2016; Jordans et al., 2009). Indeed, leakage of CtD from the lysosome into the cytosol induces apoptosis (Liaudet-Coopman et al., 2006). In addition, Cts B, D, G, K, L, S, and X participate in the degradation of the major extracellular matrix components in various pathophysiological processes (Brix et al., 2008).

Almost all types of Cts share a common synthetic pathway (Ishidoh and Kominami, 2002). They are synthesized as inactive preproenzyme, and following translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the N-terminal signal peptide of the precursor protein is cleaved with simultaneous N-linked glycosylation of the proenzyme (zymogen) (Erickson, 1989; Wiederanders et al., 2003). The propeptide is transported to the Golgi apparatus where it is further glycosylated and phosphorylated to form a mannose-6-phosphate protein that is recognized by the mannose-6-phosphate receptor and carried toward the lysosome where it is hydrolyzed to the active form. This general mechanism of Ct biosynthesis and transport may vary in some cases. The proteolytic cleavage of the zymogen may occur either through an autocatalytic process which is facilitated by the binding of the zymogen to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) or through the action of other proteases (Dahl et al., 2001; Vasiljeva et al., 2005; Caglic et al., 2007).

Although Cts show similarities in their cellular localization and biosynthesis, they are expressed at different levels in tissues and organs (Table 1). While some Cts such as B, H, L, C, and O are ubiquitously expressed, other Cts such as F, K, S, V, X, and W show a more limited cell and tissue distribution and expression. The differences in tissue localization and expression levels suggest specific cellular functions for different Cts (Brix et al., 2008; Reiser et al., 2010; Stoka et al., 2016). The relevance of the Cts physiological roles in different organs and tissues is supported by multiple evidence demonstrating that abnormal levels or activity of Cts correlate with numerous human diseases, including inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, obesity, cancer, kidney dysfunction, and others (Table 1). In particular, depending on the cell type localization, Cts B, D, L, and S regulate in the kidney different physiopathological processes, by activating signaling pathways that ultimately may result in kidney disease (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cellular processes and kidney diseases involving cathepsins in different renal cell types. In podocytes, CtB participates in inflammation during ESRD, CtD is involved in apoptosis in glomerulosclerosis, and CtL plays a role in cytoskeleton reorganization and cell cycle regulation during glomerular kidney disease, proteinuria, renal failure and polycystic kidney disease. In endothelial cells, CtB and CtD are involved in inflammation. In addition, CtD participates in interstitial fibrosis and endothelial dysfunction during CKD. CtS is important in CKD, diabetic nephropathy and ESRD. In tubular cells, CtsB is involved in apoptosis and autophagy during AKI, and CtD in apoptosis and ECM remodeling during CKD. CtG participates in fibrosis during proteinuria, and CtL in autophagy in AKI. ESRD, end-stage renal disease; KD, kidney disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ECM, extracellular matrix; AKI, acute kidney injury.

Cathepsins in acute kidney injury (AKI)

AKI is characterized by a relatively sudden reduction, within 48 hours, in kidney function or production, processing, and excretion of ultrafiltrate by the kidney (decreased glomerular filtration rate, GFR) (Mehta et al., 2007). Permanent damage to the microvasculature with subsequent abnormalities in kidney structure and function are caused by AKI. Incomplete recovery from AKI leads to the development of CKD (Venkatachalam et al., 2015; Sud et al., 2016). To date, no effective treatments for AKI are available.

A variety of insults may promote the onset of AKI, leading all of them to epithelial tubular cell death. Increasing evidence demonstrates that ER dysfunction and mitochondrial stress causing tubular damage are important factors in the pathogenesis of AKI (Tábara et al., 2014; Ishimoto and Inagi, 2016; Duann and Lin, 2017; Galvan et al., 2017). Cts play important roles in the signaling pathways driving apoptotic and necrotic cell death, by degrading different substrates and/or contributing to mitochondrial destabilization (Turk et al., 2002; Stoka et al., 2005; Turk and Stoka, 2007). Increased expression levels and activation of CtB have been observed in the human proximal tubular epithelial cell line HK-2 undergoing to apoptosis (Wang et al., 2008). Autophagy induction in proximal tubular cells occurs during AKI (Livingston and Dong, 2014). The activity of CtB and CtL decreases when autophagy-lysosome pathway in HK-2 is disrupted by advanced glycation end products in diabetic nephropathy (Liu et al., 2015). Decreased activity of CtB correlates with an impairment of the autophagic flux and worsening of the renal function in a tubular epithelial cell model (Herzog et al., 2012). In a rat model of AKI, a significant decrease of CtB was detected in the affected proximal tubules, which correlated with increased severity of the histopathological lesions of the tubules (Svara et al., 2010). However, although autophagy causes cell death under certain conditions, a renoprotective role for autophagy in AKI has been established (Jiang et al., 2012). Urinary CtB levels have shown a strong inverse correlation with surrogate markers of nephron number in intrauterine growth-restricted neonates and pre-term infants, suggesting that urinary CtB activity may represent an useful tool for early predicting renal susceptibility to damage in low birth weight neonates (Aisa et al., 2016). Serum CtB concentration directly correlates with the loss of renal function in healthy individuals and the aging-related decrease of kidney function in the normal population (Wang et al., 2016).

The protease CtD is highly expressed in damaged tubular cells suggesting a possible contribution of CtD to cell death in AKI (Cocchiaro et al., 2016). During apoptosis, lysosomal membrane permeabilization allows translocation of CtD from the lysosome into the cytosol where it can exert its pro-apoptotic function. Cytosolic CtD cleaves Bid protein into tBid triggering the insertion of Bax protein into the mitochondrial membrane. This leads to cytochrome c release from the mitochondria into the cytosol, and the activation of pro-caspases 9 and 3 (Stoka et al., 2001). Enhanced CtD expression has been found in murine models of AKI (Kimura et al., 2012; Cocchiaro et al., 2016). CtD has been recently identified as a possible novel prognostic marker for AKI, as it is differentially regulated in urine from late/non recovered vs. early/recovered AKI patients (Aregger et al., 2014).

Translocation of CtL from the lysosome into the cytoplasm is a key event in the induction of glomerular kidney disease (Sever et al., 2007). The onset of proteinuria in kidney dysfunctions reflects a migratory event in the foot processes of the podocytes that correlates with the activation of CtL (Reiser et al., 2004; Cao et al., 2017). Three substrates have been described for cytosolic CtL in podocytes: CD2-associated protein, synaptopodin and dynamin (Sever et al., 2007; Mundel and Reiser, 2010; Yaddanapudi et al., 2011). These proteins are crucial for maintaining the normal cytoskeleton architecture of podocytes, and their degradation by CtL results in the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, proteinuria and renal failure (Reiser et al., 2010; Garsen et al., 2016). An emerging role of nuclear CtL in polycystic kidney disease comes out from the evidence that a CtL isoform lacking of a signal peptide localizes to the nucleus in S phase and processes the CDP/Cux transcription factor, thus regulating cell cycle progression (Goulet et al., 2004). The quantification of CtL has been demonstrated to provide a better predictive value for AKI than creatinine, urea and urine output (Haase et al., 2014). Genome expression studies performed with RNA from kidneys of 7-week-old male and female double transgenic rats (dTGRs), harboring human renin and angiotensinogen genes, showed that CtL was differentially expressed between the sexes and was strongly associated with the degree of renal injury (Bauer et al., 2011).

Finally, CtG has been identified as a critical component sustaining neutrophil-mediated acute tissue pathology and subsequent fibrosis after renal ischemia/reperfusion injury (Shimoda et al., 2007). It has been shown that CtG mediates marked changes in glomerular permeability in vivo, contributing to proteinuria (Johnson et al., 1988).

Cathepsins in chronic kidney disease (CKD)

In spite of advance in the development of treatment approaches to improve outcomes, CKD is still associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate for patients affected by kidney dysfunctions (Hill et al., 2016; Glassock et al., 2017). AKI can contribute or worse the progression of CKD because of an abnormal or incomplete repair response (Chawla et al., 2014). The primary glomerular injury leads to a decreased post-glomerular flow, which finally results into peri-tubular capillary loss. Alternatively, renal injury can trigger an inflammatory response that recruits profibrotic cytokines such as transforming growth factor-β, and further induces the transformation of renal epithelial and endothelial cells to myofibroblasts (De Chiara and Crean, 2016; Cruz-Solbes and Youker, 2017). The histopathological hallmark of CKD is tubulointerstitial fibrosis, which is currently thought to be the best predictor to assess progression toward end-stage renal disease (Liu, 2006).

During CKD, CtD plays critical roles in inflammation and endothelial dysfunction (Erdmann et al., 2008; Ozkayar et al., 2015; Fox et al., 2016). Elevated expression levels of CtD have been found in human and murine damaged kidneys. Inhibition of CtD by Pepstatin A in murine models of progressive CKD resulted in a reduction of interstitial fibrosis (Fox et al., 2016). CtD inhibition led to an increase in extracellular protease activity of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) due to altered lysosomal recycling; UPA processes plasminogen into plasmin, which can degrade extracellular matrix proteins (Eddy, 2009). A role for CtD in podocytes, responsible for maintaining the ultrafiltration barrier thus preventing urinary protein loss, has also been reported (Yamamoto-Nonaka et al., 2016). In a podocyte-specific knock-out mouse model, the absence of CtD resulted in podocyte apoptotic cell death, and in age–dependent, late–onset glomerulosclerosis (Alghamdi et al., 2017). Therefore, CtD activity in kidney could be different depending on the cell type, and further studies will be required to clarify this issue. In CKD, CtD serum levels were significantly higher and correlated with endothelial dysfunction in patients (Ozkayar et al., 2015). However, no correlation was found between serum CtD levels and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, indicating that enhanced CtD could be a selective risk factor for endothelial dysfunction in kidney disease.

Altered levels of CtB activity have been detected under pathological processes in kidney (Ling et al., 1998; Senatorski et al., 1998; Svara et al., 2010). Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3), which activates both the innate and adaptive immune systems, is cleaved and activated by CtB (Garcia-Cattaneo et al., 2012). CtB-dependent activation of TLR3 leads to the activation of the transcription factors NF-κB and interferon regulatory factor 3, resulting into the production of type I interferons and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8 (Kawasaki and Kawai, 2014). In the kidney, inflammation promotes the progression of glomerular sclerotic pathologies resulting in end-stage renal disease (Anders and Muruve, 2011; Lim et al., 2016). It has been demonstrated that CtB mediates the signaling pathway activating the inflammasome, a large multiprotein complex containing NOD-like receptor with pyrin domain 3 (NLRP3) which triggers the production of proinflammatory cytokines in response to infection and tissue injury (Conley et al., 2017). NLRP3 inflammasome activation by CtB may promote glomerular inflammation and other cell damages resulting into glomerular injury and end-stage renal disease. Inflammasome activation may occur not only in immune cells but also in residential cells such as endothelial cells and podocytes in the glomeruli (Conley et al., 2017). Thus, NLRP3 inflammasome has been suggested as a potential target for the treatment of progressive CKD (Scarpioni et al., 2016). A correlation between serum CtB concentration and the age-related decline in renal function has been described in healthy individuals (Wang et al., 2016). CtB has also been shown to be involved in diabetic nephropathy (Musante et al., 2015). Other reports demonstrate a reduction of CtB activity during polycystic kidney disease (Schaefer et al., 1996; Hartz and Wilson, 1997; Tao et al., 2005), puromycin induced nephrosis (Huang et al., 1999), and rat and human diabetic nephropathy (Shechter et al., 1994; Grzebyk et al., 2013; Peres et al., 2013). Conversely, CtB expression increased in unilateral ureteric obstruction mouse model, however, its inhibition led to no reduction in kidney fibrosis (Fox et al., 2016).

The expression of CtL results to be enhanced in various glomerular diseases such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous glomerulonephritis, and diabetic nephropathy (Baricos et al., 1991; Sever et al., 2007). Induction of CtL expression in podocytes has been associated with the development of proteinuria in puromycin aminonucleoside induced-kidney failure (Reiser et al., 2004), and streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy (Garsen et al., 2016). CtL can contribute to the development of kidney disease by different mechanisms. Cytoplasmic CtL cleaves the GTPase dynamin resulting in podocyte failure and proteinuria (Sever et al., 2007). In addition, CtL activates proteins such as heparanase that are involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy (Garsen et al., 2016). Interestingly, CtL expression levels resulted to be lower in males than in females, but the increase in CtL detected with disease progression was greater in males. This evidence strongly suggests that estrogens regulate CtL expression and activity (Bauer et al., 2011). In CKD patients, serum CtL activity is markedly elevated and its levels positively correlate with the severity of proteinuria (Cohen and Kretzler, 2003; Sever et al., 2007; Cao et al., 2017). The presence and severity of proteinuria in patients with CKD is associated with higher mortality and morbidity (Hemmelgarn et al., 2010; Garsen et al., 2016). Elevated CtL activity correlates with higher hospital admission rates in CKD patients (Cao et al., 2017). Urinary excretion of CtL was higher in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus with respect to healthy patients (Sołtysiak et al., 2014).

In contrast with other Ct members, CtS remains catalytically active under neutral pH (optimum pH values, 6.0–7.5) and its main physiological role is outside the lysosome. Intracellularly, CtS has an important role in the intrinsic apoptotic pathways inducing cleavage of both caspase-3 and poly ADP ribose polymerase (Wang et al., 2015). CtS can translocate to the cell surface and be secreted into the extracellular milieu, participating in the degradation of extracellular matrix proteins (Jordans et al., 2009; Wilkinson et al., 2015). Beside its ability to degrade fibers, CtS may activate the protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) in endothelial cells (Elmariah et al., 2014). Indeed, in vitro studies demonstrated that CtS may damage the integrity and barrier function of glomerular endothelial cells (Aikawa et al., 2009; Lafarge et al., 2010). In human and mouse type 2 diabetic nephropathy, CtS mRNA resulted to be expressed only in CD68(+) intrarenal monocytes, while the protein was found along endothelial cells and inside proximal tubular epithelial cells (Kumar et al., 2016). High circulating levels of CtS have been correlated with increased mortality risk in the human population (Jobs et al., 2011) because of its involvement in the complex pathways leading to cardiovascular disease, cancer and impaired kidney function (Feldreich et al., 2016). In vivo studies demonstrated that CtS-induced elastolysis stimulates arterial and aortic valve calcification in CKD, suggesting that CtS might be a therapeutic target to prevent cardiovascular complications in CKD (Aikawa et al., 2009). Up-regulation of CtS has been detected in ochratoxin A-induced nephropathy (Luhe et al., 2003). Furthermore, selective CtS inhibition attenuates atherogenesis in hypercholesterolemic mice with CKD (Figueiredo et al., 2015). In mice, serum levels of CtS and markers of inflammation-related endothelial dysfunction, such as soluble tumor-necrosis-factor receptors (sTNFR) 1 and 2, increase with the decline of estimated GFR, while in human cohortes an increase of GFR was associated with a decrease of CtS (Steubl et al., 2017). However, in patients with end-stage renal disease, high levels of CtS were associated with sTNFR1/2 activation (Carlsson et al., 2015). These findings indicate that CtS activity increases with CKD progression, thus representing a potential marker of disease progression.

Conclusions and perspective

Kidney disease, characterized by the progressive loss of kidney functions, occurs through different steps of damage leading to organ failure and end-stage renal disease. Due to the lack of specific treatments to stop disease progression (Mehta et al., 2007; Black et al., 2010), kidney disease remains an important clinical problem affecting millions of people worldwide (Jha et al., 2013; Hu and Coresh, 2017). In addition, the traditional clinical markers used to assess and monitor kidney function such as serum creatinine, GFR, and the presence of proteinuria often miss the early stages of the disease delaying essential treatment (Mårtensson et al., 2012; Haase et al., 2014; Wasung et al., 2015). Indeed, both of the two major groups of kidney disease, AKI and CKD, are still associated with increasing morbidity and mortality (Coca et al., 2009; Kerr et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2016; Glassock et al., 2017). Therefore, there is an urgent need to better understand the biological events driving AKI and CKD in order to either find more accurate and sensitive biomarkers of cell injury that may predict disease progression or identify critical cellular and molecular mediators that may provide novel therapeutic targets. Lysosomal Cts have emerged in the recent years as important players in kidney disease, thus suggesting their detection as early diagnostic approach. Moreover, targeting Cts or their downstream signaling seems a promising treatment strategy to slow down kidney disease progression. Nevertheless, further studies are required to assess the suitability, specificity and drugability of Cts in human kidney disease.

Author contributions

PC, VDP, LMP, and AM has conceived, designed the work, written and revised the manuscript. RDM, ST, LA, and AP have collaborated to design, to write and revise the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. The work has been supported by a grant from University of Naples Federico II to LMP, and by Northern Countries Kidney Research Fund (NCKRF), Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support and MRC Confidence in Concept funds granted to AM. AM salary is funded through Newcastle University Research Fellowship (NURF) scheme.

References

  1. Abd-Elgaliel W. R., Cruz-Monserrate Z., Wang H., Logsdon C. D., Tung C. H. (2013). Pancreatic cancer-associated Cathepsin E as a drug activator. J. Control Release 167, 221–227. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamson J. W. (1996). Regulation of red blood cell production. Am. J. Med. 101, 4S−6S. 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00160-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aikawa E., Aikawa M., Libby P., Figueiredo J. L., Rusanescu G., Iwamoto Y., et al. (2009). Arterial and aortic valve calcification abolished by elastolytic cathepsin S deficiency in chronic renal disease. Circulation 119, 1785–1794. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.827972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aisa M. C., Cappuccini B., Barbati A., Orlacchio A., Baglioni M., Di Renzo G. C. (2016). Biochemical parameters of renal impairment/injury and surrogate markers of nephron number in intrauterine growth-restricted and preterm neonates at 30-40 days of postnatal corrected age. Pediatr. Nephrol. 31, 2277–2287. 10.1007/s00467-016-3484-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alghamdi T. A., Majumder S., Thieme K., Batchu S. N., White K. E., Liu Y., et al. (2017). Janus Kinase 2 regulates transcription factor EB expression and autophagy completion in glomerular podocytes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 28, 2641–2653. 10.1681/ASN.2016111208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Allan E. R. O., Campden R. I., Ewanchuk B. W., Tailor P., Balce D. R., McKenna N. T., et al. (2017). A role for cathepsin Z in neuroinflammation provides mechanistic support for an epigenetic risk factor in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroinflammation 14:103. 10.1186/s12974-017-0874-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Anders H. J., Muruve D. A. (2011). The inflammasomes in kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 22, 1007–1018. 10.1681/ASN.2010080798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Aregger F., Uehlinger D. E., Witowski J., Brunisholz R. A., Hunziker P., Frey F. J., et al. (2014). Identification of IGFBP-7 by urinary proteomics as a novel prognostic marker in early acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 85, 909–919. 10.1038/ki.2013.363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baricos W. H., Cortez S. L., Le Q. C., Wu L. T., Shaw E., Hanada K., et al. (1991). Evidence suggesting a role for cathepsin L in an experimental model of glomerulonephritis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 288, 468–472. 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90222-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauer Y., Hess P., Qiu C., Klenk A., Renault B., Wanner D., et al. (2011). Identification of cathepsin L as a potential sex-specific biomarker for renal damage. Hypertension 57, 795–801. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.157206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Benes P., Vetvicka V., Fusek M. (2008). Cathepsin D–many functions of one aspartic protease. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 68, 12–28. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Black C., Sharma P., Scotland G., McCullough K., McGurn D., Robertson L., et al. (2010). Early referral strategies for management of people with markers of renal disease: a systematic review of the evidence of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and economic analysis. Health Technol. Assess. 14, 1–184. 10.3310/hta14210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brix K., Dunkhorst A., Mayer K., Jordans S. (2008). Cysteine cathepsins: cellular roadmap to different functions. Biochimie 90, 194–207. 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Buhling F., Kellner U., Guenther D., Kahl S., Brömme D., Weber E., et al. (2002). Characterization of novel anti-cathepsin W antibodies and cellular distribution of cathepsin W in the gastrointestinal tract. Biol. Chem. 383, 1285–1289. 10.1515/BC.2002.144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bunatova K., Obermajer N., Kotyza J., Pesek M., Kos J. (2009). Levels of cathepsins S and H in pleural fluids of inflammatory and neoplastic origin. Int. J. Biol. Markers 24, 47–51. 10.5301/JBM.2009.1216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Caglic D., Pungercar J. R., Pejler G., Turk V., Turk B. (2007). Glycosaminoglycans facilitate procathepsin B activation through disruption of propeptide-mature enzyme interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 33076–33085. 10.1074/jbc.M705761200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cairns J., Ingle J. N., Wickerham L. D., Weinshilboum R., Liu M., Wang L. (2017). SNPs near the cysteine proteinase cathepsin O gene (CTSO) determine tamoxifen sensitivity in ERα-positive breast cancer through regulation of BRCA1. PLoS Genet. 13:e1007031. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cao Y., Liu X., Li Y., Lu Y., Zhong H., Jiang W., et al. (2017). Cathepsin L activity correlates with proteinuria in chronic kidney disease in humans. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 49, 1409–1417. 10.1007/s11255-017-1626-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Carlsson A. C., Carrero J. J., Stenvinkel P., Bottai M., Barany P., Larsson A., et al. (2015). Endostatin, cathepsin S, and cathepsin L, and their association with inflammatory markers and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Blood Purif. 39, 259–265. 10.1159/000381664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chawla L. S., Eggers P. W., Star R. A., Kimmel P. L. (2014). Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease as interconnected syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 58–66. 10.1056/NEJMra1214243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ciechanover A. (2012). Intracellular protein degradation: from a vague idea thru the lysosome and the ubiquitin-proteasome system and onto human diseases and drug targeting. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1824, 3–13. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Coca S. G., Yusuf B., Shlipak M. G., Garg A. X., Parikh C. R. (2009). Long-term risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 53, 961–973. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cocchiaro P., Fox C., Tregidgo N. W., Howarth R., Wood K. M., Situmorang G. R., et al. (2016). Lysosomal protease cathepsin D; a new driver of apoptosis during acute kidney injury. Sci. Rep. 6:27112. 10.1038/srep27112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cohen C. D., Kretzler M. (2003). Gene-expression analysis of microdissected renal biopsies. Methods Mol. Med. 86, 285–293. 10.1385/1-59259-392-5:285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cohen-Mazor M., Mazor R., Kristal B., Sela S. (2014). Elastase and cathepsin G from primed leukocytes cleave vascular endothelial cadherin in hemodialysis patients. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014:459640. 10.1155/2014/459640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Conley S. M., Abais J. M., Boini K. M., Li P. L. (2017). Inflammasome activation in chronic glomerular diseases. Curr. Drug Targets 18, 1019–1029. 10.2174/1389450117666160817103435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cruz-Solbes A. S., Youker K. (2017). Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT): role and implications in kidney fibrosis. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 60, 345–372. 10.1007/978-3-319-51436-9_13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cuervo A. M., Dice J. F. (1998). Lysosomes, a meeting point of proteins, chaperones, and proteases. J. Mol. Med. 76, 6–12. 10.1007/s109-1998-8099-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dahl S. W., Halkier T., Lauritzen C., Dolenc I., Pedersen J., Turk V., et al. (2001). Human recombinant pro-dipeptidyl peptidase I (cathepsin C) can be activated by cathepsins L and S but not by autocatalytic processing. Biochemistry 40, 1671–1678. 10.1021/bi001693z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. d'Azzo A., Machado E., Annunziata I. (2015). Pathogenesis, emerging therapeutic targets and treatment in sialidosis. Expert Opin. Orphan Drugs 3, 491–504. 10.1517/21678707.2015.1025746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. De Chiara L., Crean J. (2016). Emerging transcriptional mechanisms in the regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cellular plasticity in the kidney. J. Clin. Med. 5:E6. 10.3390/jcm5010006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Duann P., Lin P. H. (2017). Mitochondria damage and kidney disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 982, 529–551. 10.1007/978-3-319-55330-6_27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Eddy A. A. (2009). Serine proteases, inhibitors and receptors in renal fibrosis. Thromb. Haemost. 101, 656–664. 10.1160/TH08-12-0779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Elmariah S. B., Reddy V. B., Lerner E. A. (2014). Cathepsin S signals via PAR2 and generates a novel tethered ligand receptor agonist. PLoS ONE 9:e99702. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Erdmann S., Ricken A., Hummitzsch K., Merkwitz C., Schliebe N., Gaunitz F., et al. (2008). Inflammatory cytokines increase extracellular procathepsin D in permanent and primary endothelial cell cultures. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 87, 311–323. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Erickson A. H. (1989). Biosynthesis of lysosomal endopeptidases. J. Cell. Biochem. 40, 31–41. 10.1002/jcb.240400104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Feldreich T., Carlsson A. C., Risérus U., Larsson A., Lind L., Ärnlöv J. (2016). The association between serum cathepsin L and mortality in older adults. Atherosclerosis 254, 109–116. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.09.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Figueiredo J. L., Aikawa M., Zheng C., Aaron J., Lax L., Libby P., et al. (2015). Selective cathepsin S inhibition attenuates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E–deficient mice with chronic renal disease. Am. J. Pathol. 185, 1156–1166. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fox C., Cocchiaro P., Oakley F., Howarth R., Callaghan K., Leslie J., et al. (2016). Inhibition of lysosomal protease cathepsin D reduces renal fibrosis in murine chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 6:20101. 10.1038/srep20101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Funkelstein L., Lu W. D., Koch B., Mosier C., Toneff T., Taupenot L., et al. (2012). Human cathepsin V protease participates in production of enkephalin and NPY neuropeptide neurotransmitters. Biol. Chem. 287, 15232–15241. 10.1074/jbc.M111.310607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Galvan D. L., Green N. H., Danesh F. R. (2017). The hallmarks of mitochondrial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 92, 1051–1057. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.05.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Garcia-Cattaneo A., Gobert F. X., Müller M., Toscano F., Flores M., Lescure A., et al. (2012). Cleavage of Toll-like receptor 3 by cathepsins B and H is essential for signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 9053–9058. 10.1073/pnas.1115091109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Garsen M., Rops A. L., Dijkman H., Willemsen B., van Kuppevelt T. H., Russel F. G., et al. (2016). Cathepsin L is crucial for the development of early experimental diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 90, 1012–1022. 10.1016/j.kint.2016.06.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Glassock R. J., Warnock D. G., Delanaye P. (2017). The global burden of chronic kidney disease: estimates, variability and pitfalls. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 13, 104–114. 10.1038/nrneph.2016.163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gocheva V., Joyce J. A. (2007). Cysteine cathepsins and the cutting edge of cancer invasion. Cell Cycle 6, 60–64. 10.4161/cc.6.1.3669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Goulet B., Baruch A., Moon N. S., Poirier M., Sansregret L. L., Erickson A., et al. (2004). A cathepsin L isoform that is devoid of a signal peptide localizes to the nucleus in S phase and processes the CDP/Cux transcription factor. Mol. Cell. 14, 207–219. 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00209-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Grzebyk E., Knapik-Kordecka M., Piwowar A. (2013). Advanced glycation end-products and cathepsin cysteine protease in type 2 diabetic patients. Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 123, 364–370. 10.20452/pamw.1821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gueutin V., Deray G., Isnard-Bagnis C. (2012). Renal physiology. Bull. Cancer 99, 237–249. 10.1152/ajprenal.00239.2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Haase M., Bellomo R., Albert C., Vanpoucke G., Thomas G., Laroy W., et al. (2014). The identification of three novel biomarkers of major adverse kidney events. Biomark. Med. 8, 1207–1217. 10.2217/bmm.14.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hamon Y., Legowska M., Hervé V., Dallet-Choisy S., Marchand-Adam S., Vanderlynden L., et al. (2016). Neutrophilic cathepsin C is maturated by a multistep proteolytic process and secreted by activated cells during inflammatory lung diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 8486–8499. 10.1074/jbc.M115.707109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hao L., Zhu G., Lu Y., Wang M., Jules J., Zhou X., et al. (2015). Deficiency of cathepsin K prevents inflammation and bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis and reveals its shared osteoimmune role. FEBS Lett. 589, 1331–1339. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hartz P. A., Wilson P. D. (1997). Functional defects in lysosomal enzymes in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): abnormalities in synthesis, molecular processing, polarity, and secretion. Biochem. Mol. Med. 60, 8–26. 10.1006/bmme.1996.2542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hemmelgarn B. R., Manns B. J., Lloyd A., James M. T., Klarenbach S., Quinn R. R., et al. (2010). Relation between kidney function, proteinuria, and adverse outcomes. JAMA 303, 423–429. 10.1001/jama.2010.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Herrmann S. M., Funke-Kaiser H., Schmidt-Petersen K., Nicaud V., Gautier-Bertrand M., Evans A., et al. (2001). Characterization of polymorphic structure of cathepsin G gene: role in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 21, 1538–1543. 10.1161/hq0901.095555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Herzog C., Yang C., Holmes A., Kaushal G. P. (2012). zVAD-fmk prevents cisplatin-induced cleavage of autophagy proteins but impairs autophagic flux and worsens renal function. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 303, F1239–F1250. 10.1152/ajprenal.00659.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hill N. R., Fatoba S. T., Oke J. L., Hirst J. A., O'Callaghan C. A., Lasserson D. S., et al. (2016). Global prevalence of chronic kidney disease – a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0158765. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hu J. R., Coresh J. (2017). The public health dimension of chronic kidney disease: what we have learnt over the past decade. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 32, ii113–ii120. 10.1093/ndt/gfw416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hua Y., Nair S. (2015). Proteases in cardiometabolic diseases: pathophysiology, molecular mechanisms and clinical applications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1852, 195–208. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.04.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Huang S., Schaefer R. M., Reisch S., Paczek L., Schaefer L., Teschner M., et al. (1999). Suppressed activities of cathepsins and metalloproteinases in the chronic model of puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 22, 121–127. 10.1159/000025917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Huang X., Vaag A., Carlsson E., Hansson M., Ahrén B., Groop L. (2003). Impaired cathepsin L gene expression in skeletal muscle is associated with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 52, 2411–2418. 10.2337/diabetes.52.9.2411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Husmann K., Muff R., Bolander M. E., Sarkar G., Born W., Fuchs B. (2008). Cathepsins and osteosarcoma: expression analysis identifies cathepsin K as an indicator of metastasis. Mol. Carcinog. 47, 66–73. 10.1002/mc.20362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ishidoh K., Kominami E. (2002). Processing and activation of lysosomal proteinases. Biol. Chem. 383, 1827–1831. 10.1515/BC.2002.206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ishimoto Y., Inagi R. (2016). Mitochondria: a therapeutic target in acute kidney injury. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 31, 1062–1069. 10.1093/ndt/gfv317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Jha V., Garcia-Garcia G., Iseki K., Li Z., Naicker S., Plattner B., et al. (2013). Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet 382, 260–272. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60687-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ji C., Zhao Y., Kou Y. W., Shao H., Guo L., Bao C. H., et al. (2017). Cathepsin F knockdown induces proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in gastric cancer cells. Oncol. Res. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.3727/096504017X14928634401204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Jiang M., Wei Q., Dong G., Komatsu M., Su Y., Dong Z. (2012). Autophagy in proximal tubules protects against acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 82, 1271–1283. 10.1038/ki.2012.261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Jobs E., Ingelsson E., Risérus U., Nerpin E., Jobs M., Sundström J., et al. (2011). Association between serum cathepsin S and mortality in older adults. JAMA 306, 1113–1121. 10.1001/jama.2011.1246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Jobs E., Risérus U., Ingelsson E., Sundström J., Jobs M., Nerpin E., et al. (2013). Serum cathepsin S is associated with decreased insulin sensitivity and the development of type 2 diabetes in a community-based cohort of elderly men. Diabetes Care 36, 163–165. 10.2337/dc12-0494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Johnson R. J., Couser W. G., Alpers C. E., Vissers M., Schulze M., Klebanoff S. J. (1988). The human neutrophil serine proteinases, elastase and cathepsin G, can mediate glomerular injury in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 168, 1169–1174. 10.1084/jem.168.3.1169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jordans S., Jenko-Kokalj S., Kühl N. M., Tedelind S., Sendt W., Brömme D., et al. (2009). Monitoring compartment-specific substrate cleavage by cathepsins B, K, L and S at physiological pH and redox conditions. BMC Biochem. 10:23. 10.1186/1471-2091-10-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Jørgensen I., Kos J., Krašovec M., Troelsen L., Klarlund M., Jensen T. W., et al. (2011). Serum cysteine proteases and their inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: relation to disease activity and radiographic progression. Clin. Rheumatol. 30, 633–638. 10.1007/s10067-010-1585-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Jormsjö S., Wuttge D. M., Sirsjö A., Whatling C., Hamsten A., Stemme S., et al. (2002). Differential expression of cysteine and aspartic proteases during progression of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Am. J. Pathol. 161, 939–945. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64254-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kawakubo T., Yasukochi A., Toyama T., Takahashi S., Okamoto K., Tsukuba T., et al. (2014). Repression of cathepsin E expression increases the risk of mammary carcinogenesis and links to poor prognosis in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 35, 714–726. 10.1093/carcin/bgt373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Kawasaki T., Kawai T. (2014). Toll-Like receptor signaling pathways. Front. Immunol. 5:461. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Keegan P. M., Surapaneni S., Platt M. O. (2012). Sickle cell disease activates peripheral blood mononuclear cells to induce cathepsins K and V activity in endothelial cells. Anemia 2012:201781. 10.1155/2012/201781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kerr M., Bedford M., Matthews B., O'Donoghue D. (2014). The economic impact of acute kidney injury in England. Nephrol. Dial Transplant. 29, 1362–1368. 10.1093/ndt/gfu016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Kimura A., Ishida Y., Inagaki M., Nakamura Y., Sanke T., Mukaida N., et al. (2012). Interferon-γ is protective in cisplatin-induced renal injury by enhancing autophagic flux. Kidney Int. 82, 1093–1104. 10.1038/ki.2012.240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Korkmaz B., Horwitz M. S., Jenne D. E., Gauthier F. (2010). Neutrophil elastase, proteinase 3, and cathepsin G as therapeutic targets in human diseases. Pharmacol. Rev. 62, 726–759. 10.1124/pr.110.002733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Korpos É., Kadri N., Kappelhoff R., Wegner J., Overall C. M., Weber E., et al. (2013). The peri-islet basement membrane, a barrier to infiltrating leukocytes in type 1 diabetes in mouse and human. Diabetes 62, 531–542. 10.2337/db12-0432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Kosikowska P., Lesner A. (2013). Inhibitors of cathepsin G: a patent review (2005 to present). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 23, 1611–1624. 10.1517/13543776.2013.835397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Kothapalli R., Bailey R. D., Kusmartseva I., Mane S., Epling-Burnette P. K., Loughran T. P., et al. (2003). Constitutive expression of cytotoxic proteases and down-regulation of protease inhibitors in LGL leukemia. Int. J. Oncol. 22, 33–39. 10.3892/ijo.22.1.33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Krueger S., Kalinski T., Hundertmark T., Wex T., Küster D., Peitz U., et al. (2005). Up-regulation of cathepsin X in Helicobacter pylori gastritis and gastric cancer. J. Pathol. 207, 32–42. 10.1002/path.1820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kumar Vr. S., Darisipudi M. N., Steiger S., Devarapu S. K., Tato M., Kukarni O. P., et al. (2016). Cathepsin S cleavage of protease-activated receptor-2 on endothelial cells promotes microvascular diabetes complications. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 1635–1649. 10.1681/ASN.2015020208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Lafarge J. C., Naour N., Clément K., Guerre-Millo M. (2010). Cathepsins and cystatin C in atherosclerosis and obesity. Biochimie 92, 1580–1586. 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Leng Y. P., Ma Y. S., Li X. G., Chen R. F., Zeng P. Y., Li X. H., et al. (2017). l-Homocysteine-induced cathepsin V mediates the vascular endothelial inflammation in hyperhomocysteinaemia. Br. J. Pharmacol. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/bph.13920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Liaudet-Coopman E., Beaujouin M., Derocq D., Garcia M., Glondu-Lassis M., Laurent-Matha V., et al. (2006). Cathepsin D newly discovered functions of a long-standing aspartic protease in cancer and apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 237, 167–179. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Lim B. J., Yang J. W., Do W. S., Fogo A. B. (2016). Pathogenesis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 50, 405–410. 10.4132/jptm.2016.09.21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ling H., Ardjomand P., Samvakas S., Simm A., Busch G. L., Lang F., et al. (1998). Mesangial cell hypertrophy induced by NH4Cl: role of depressed activities of cathepsins due to elevated lysosomal pH. Kidney Int. 53, 1706–1712. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00952.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu W. J., Shen T. T., Chen R. H., Wu H. L., Wang Y. J., Deng J. K., et al. (2015). Autophagy-lysosome pathway in renal tubular epithelial cells is disrupted by advanced glycation end products in diabetic nephropathy. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 20499–20510. 10.1074/jbc.M115.666354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Liu Y. (2006). Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics. Kidney Int. 69, 213–217. 10.1038/sj.ki.5000054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Livingston M. J., Dong Z. (2014). Autophagy in acute kidney injury. Semin. Nephrol. 34, 17–26. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2013.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Luhe A., Hildebrand H., Bach U., Dingermann T., Ahr H. J. (2003). A new approach to studying ochratoxin A (OTA)-induced nephrotoxicity: expression profiling in vivo and in vitro employing cDNA microarrays. Toxicol. Sci. 73, 315–328. 10.1093/toxsci/kfg073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Mackay E. A., Ehrhard A., Moniatte M., Guenet C., Tardif C., Tarnus C., et al. (1997). A possible role for cathepsins D, E, and B in the processing of beta-amyloid precursor protein in Alzheimer's disease. Eur. J. Biochem. 244, 414–425. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00414.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Mårtensson J., Martling C. R., Bell M. (2012). Novel biomarkers of acute kidney injury and failure: clinical applicability. Br. J. Anaesth. 109, 843–850. 10.1093/bja/aes357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Mehta R. L., Kellum J. A., Shah S. V., Molitoris B. A., Ronco C., Warnock D. G., et al. (2007). Acute kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit. Care 11:31. 10.1186/cc5713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Moallem S. A., Nazemian F., Eliasi S., Alamdaran S. A., Shamsara J., Mohammadpour A. H. (2011). Correlation between cathepsin D serum concentration and carotid intima-media thickness in hemodialysis patients. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 43, 841–848. 10.1007/s11255-010-9729-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Mount D. B. (2014). Thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 9, 1974–1986. 10.2215/CJN.04480413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Mundel P., Reiser J. (2010). Proteinuria: an enzymatic disease of the podocyte? Kidney Int. 77, 571–580. 10.1038/ki.2009.424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Musante L., Tataruch D., Gu D., Liu X., Forsblom C., Groop P. H., et al. (2015). Proteases and protease inhibitors of urinary extracellular vesicles in diabetic nephropathy. J. Diabetes Res. 2015:289734. 10.1155/2015/289734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Nägler D. K., Krüger S., Kellner A., Ziomek E., Menard R., Buhtz P., et al. (2004). Up-regulation of cathepsin X in prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Prostate 60, 109–119. 10.1002/pros.20046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Naumnik W., Ossolinska M., Płonska I., Chyczewska E., Niklinski J. (2015). Endostatin and cathepsin-V in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 833, 55–61. 10.1007/5584_2014_26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Noda S., Asano Y., Takahashi T., Akamata K., Aozasa N., Taniguchi T., et al. (2013). Decreased cathepsin V expression due to Fli1 deficiency contributes to the development of dermal fibrosis and proliferative vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 52, 790–799. 10.1093/rheumatology/kes379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Ozkayar N., Piskinpasa S., Akyel F., Turgut D., Bulut M., Turhan T., et al. (2015). Relation between serum cathepsin D levels and endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nefrologia 35, 72–79. 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Paulli M., Feller A. C., Boveri E., Kindl S., Berti E., Rosso R., et al. (1994). Cathepsin D and E co-expression in sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease) and Langerhans' cell histiocytosis: further evidences of a phenotypic overlap between these histiocytic disorders. Virchows Arch. 424, 601–606. 10.1007/BF00195773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Pereira V. G., Queiroz M. T., D'Almeida V. (2016). Differential expression of microRNAs from miR-17 family in the cerebellum of mucopolysaccharidosis type I mice. Gene 595, 207–211. 10.1016/j.gene.2016.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Peres G. B., Juliano M. A., Simões M. J., Michelacci Y. M. (2013). Lysosomal enzymes are decreased in the kidney of diabetic rats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832, 85–95. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Peters J., Rittger A., Weisner R., Knabbe J., Zunke F., Rothaug M., et al. (2015). Lysosomal integral membrane protein type-2 (LIMP-2/SCARB2) is a substrate of cathepsin-F, a cysteine protease mutated in type-B-Kufs-disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 457, 334–340. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Pišlar A., Kos J. (2014). Cysteine cathepsins in neurological disorders. Mol. Neurobiol. 49, 1017–1030. 10.1007/s12035-013-8576-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Pozgan U., Caglic D., Rozman B., Nagase H., Turk V., Turk B. (2010). Expression and activity profiling of selected cysteine cathepsins and matrix metalloproteinases in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Biol. Chem. 391, 571–579. 10.1515/bc.2010.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Preuss H. G. (1993). Basics of renal anatomy and physiology. Clin. Lab. Med. 13, 1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Raab A. K., Mönkemüller K., Kandulski A., Weber E., Malfertheiner P., Wex T. (2011). Expression pattern of cathepsin W isoforms in peripheral blood and gastroesophageal mucosa of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Biol. Chem. 392, 1167–1172. 10.1515/BC.2011.192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Rafatian N., Karunakaran D., Rayner K. J., Leenen F. H., Milne R. W., Whitman S. C. (2013). Cathepsin G deficiency decreases complexity of atherosclerotic lesions in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 305, H1141–H1148. 10.1152/ajpheart.00618.2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Rai R., Thiagarajan S., Mohandas S., Natarajan K., Shanmuga Sekar C., Ramalingam S. (2010). Haim Munk syndrome and Papillon Lefevre syndrome–allelic mutations in cathepsin C with variation in phenotype. Int. J. Dermatol. 49, 541–543. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04300.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Reiser J., Adair B., Reinheckel T. (2010). Specialized roles for cysteine cathepsins in health and disease. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 3421–3431. 10.1172/JCI42918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Reiser J., Oh J., Shirato I., Asanuma K., Hug A., Mundel T. M., et al. (2004). Podocyte migration during nephrotic syndrome requires a coordinated interplay between cathepsin L and α 3 integrin. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 34827–34832. 10.1074/jbc.M401973200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Rewa O., Bagshaw S. M. (2014). Acute kidney injury-epidemiology, outcomes and economics. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 10, 193–207. 10.1038/nrneph.2013.282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Ruffell B., Affara N. I., Cottone L., Junankar S., Johansson M., DeNardo D. G., et al. (2013). Cathepsin C is a tissue-specific regulator of squamous carcinogenesis. Genes Dev. 27, 2086–2098. 10.1101/gad.224899.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Saftig P., Hunziker E., Wehmeyer O., Jones S., Boyde A., Rommerskirch W., et al. (1998). Impaired osteoclastic bone resorption leads to osteopetrosis in cathepsin-K-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 13453–13458. 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Sanders J. S., van Goor H., Hanemaaijer R., Kallenberg C. G., Stegeman C. A. (2004). Renal expression of matrix metalloproteinases in human ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 19, 1412–1419. 10.1093/ndt/gfh186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Scarpioni R., Ricardi M., Albertazzi V. (2016). Secondary amyloidosis in autoinflammatory diseases and the role of inflammation in renal damage. World J. Nephrol. 5, 66–75. 10.5527/wjn.v5.i1.66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Schaefer L., Han X., Gretz N., Schaefer R. M. (1996). Alterations of cathepsins B, H and L in proximal tubules from polycystic kidneys of the Han:SPRD rat. Kidney Int. 50, 424–431. 10.1038/ki.1996.332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Schechter I., Ziv E. (2011). Cathepsins S, B and L with aminopeptidases display β-secretase activity associated with the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Biol. Chem. 392, 555–569. 10.1515/bc.2011.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Senatorski G., Paczek L., Sułowicz W., Gradowska L., Bartłomiejczyk I. (1998). Urine activity of cathepsin B, collagenase and urine excretion of TGF-β1 and fibronectin in membranous glomerulonephritis. Res. Exp. Med. 198, 199–206. 10.1007/s004330050103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Sever S., Altintas M. M., Nankoe S. R., Möller C. C., Ko D., Wei C., et al. (2007). Proteolytic processing of dynamin by cytoplasmic cathepsin L is a mechanism for proteinuric kidney disease. J. Clin. Invest. 117, 2095–2104. 10.1172/JCI32022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Shechter P., Boner G., Rabkin R. (1994). Tubular cell protein degradation in early diabetic renal hypertrophy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 1582–1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Shimoda N., Fukazawa N., Nonomura K., Fairchild R. L. (2007). Cathepsin G is required for sustained inflammation and tissue injury after reperfusion of ischemic kidneys. Am. J. Pathol. 170, 930–940. 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Solau-Gervais E., Zerimech F., Lemaire R., Fontaine C., Huet G., Flipo R. M. (2007). Cysteine and serine proteases of synovial tissue in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 36, 373–377. 10.1080/03009740701340172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Sołtysiak J., Skowronska B., Fichna P., Stankiewicz W., Lewandowska-Stachowiak M., Ostalska-Nowicka D., et al. (2014). Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and cathepsin L as early predictors of kidney dysfunction in children with type 1 diabetes. Endokrynol. Pol. 65, 479–484. 10.5603/EP.2014.0067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Steubl D., Kumar S. V., Tato M., Mulay S. R., Larsson A., Lind L., et al. (2017). Circulating cathepsin-S levels correlate with GFR decline and sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 levels in mice and humans. Sci. Rep. 7:43538. 10.1038/srep43538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Stoka V., Turk B., Turk V. (2005). Lysosomal cysteine proteases: structural features and their role in apoptosis. IUBMB Life 57, 347–353. 10.1080/15216540500154920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Stoka V., Turk B., Schendel S. L., Kim T. H., Cirman T., Snipas S. J. (2001). Lysosomal protease pathways to apoptosis. cleavage of bid, not pro-caspases, is the most likely route. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3149–3157. 10.1074/jbc.M008944200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Stoka V., Turk V., Turk B. (2016). Lysosomal cathepsins and their regulation in aging and neurodegeneration. Ageing Res. Rev. 32, 22–37. 10.1016/j.arr.2016.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Sud M., Tangri N., Pintilie M., Levey A. S., Naimark D. M. (2016). Progression to stage 4 chronic kidney disease and death, acute kidney injury and hospitalization risk: a retrospective cohort study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 31, 1122–1130. 10.1093/ndt/gfv389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Sudhan D. R., Siemann D. W. (2015). Cathepsin L targeting in cancer treatment. Pharmacol. Ther. 155, 105–116. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Surendran K., Vitiello S. P., Pearce D. A. (2014). Lysosome dysfunction in the pathogenesis of kidney diseases. Pediatr. Nephrol. 29, 2253–2261. 10.1007/s00467-013-2652-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Svara T., Pogacnik M., Juntes P. (2010). Distribution and amount of cathepsin B in gentamicin-induced acute kidney injury in rats. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 13, 75–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Tábara L. C., Poveda J., Martin-Cleary C., Selgas R., Ortiz A., Sanchez-Niño M. D. (2014). Mitochondria-targeted therapies for acute kidney injury. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 16:e13. 10.1017/erm.2014.14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Tao Y., Kim J., Faubel S., Wu J. C., Falk S. A., Schrier R. W., et al. (2005). Caspase inhibition reduces tubular apoptosis and proliferation and slows disease progression in polycystic kidney disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 6954–6959. 10.1073/pnas.0408518102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Tonelli M., Riella M. (2014). Chronic kidney disease and the ageing population. Nephron Clin. Pract. 128, 319–322. 10.1159/000362458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Turk B., Stoka V. (2007). Protease signalling in cell death: caspases versus cysteine cathepsins. FEBS Lett. 581, 2761–2767. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.05.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Turk B., Stoka V., Rozman-Pungercar J., Cirman T., Droga-Mazovec G., Oreic K., et al. (2002). Apoptotic pathways: involvement of lysosomal proteases. Biol. Chem. 383, 1035–1044. 10.1515/BC.2002.112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. van den Brûle S., Misson P., Bühling F., Lison D., Huaux F. (2005). Overexpression of cathepsin K during silica-induced lung fibrosis and control by TGF-β. Respir. Res. 6:84. 10.1186/1465-9921-6-84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Vasiljeva O., Dolinar M., Rozman-Pungerčar J., Turk V., Turk B. (2005). Recombinant human procathepsin S is capable of autocatalytic processing at neutral pH in the presence of glycosaminoglycans, FEBS Lett. 579, 1285–1290. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.12.093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Vazquez-Ortiz G., Pina-Sanchez P., Vazquez K., Duenas A., Taja L., Mendoza P., et al. (2005). Overexpression of cathepsin F, matrix metalloproteinases 11 and 12 in cervical cancer. BMC Cancer 5:68. 10.1186/1471-2407-5-68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Venkatachalam M. A., Weinberg J. M., Kriz W., Bidani A. K. (2015). Failed tubule recovery, AKI-CKD transition, and kidney disease progression. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 26, 1765–1776. 10.1681/ASN.2015010006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Wang C., Jiang Z., Yao J., Wu X., Sun L., Liu C., et al. (2008). Participation of cathepsin B in emodin-induced apoptosis in HK-2 Cells. Toxicol. Lett. 181, 196–204. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Wang J., Chen L., Li Y., Guan X. Y. (2011). Overexpression of cathepsin Z contributes to tumor metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE 6:e24967. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Wang N., Bai X., Jin B., Han W., Sun X., Chen X. (2016). The association of serum cathepsin B concentration with age-related cardiovascular-renal subclinical state in a healthy Chinese population. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 65, 146–155. 10.1016/j.archger.2016.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Wang X., Xiong L., Yu G., Li D., Peng T., Luo D., et al. (2015). Cathepsin S silencing induces apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 7, 100–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Wasung M. E., Chawla L. S., Madero M. (2015). Biomarkers of renal function, which and when? Clin. Chim. Acta 438, 350–357. 10.1016/j.cca.2014.08.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Wiederanders B., Kaulmann G., Schilling K. (2003). Functions of propeptide parts in cysteine proteases. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 4, 309–326. 10.2174/1389203033487081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Wilkinson R. D., Williams R., Scott C. J., Burden R. E. (2015). Cathepsin S: therapeutic, diagnostic, and prognostic potential. Biol. Chem. 396, 867–882. 10.1515/hsz-2015-0114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Yaddanapudi S., Altintas M. M., Kistler A. D., Fernandez I., Möller C. C., Wei C., et al. (2011). CD2AP in mouse and human podocytes controls a proteolytic program that regulates cytoskeletal structure and cellular survival. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 3965–3980. 10.1172/JCI58552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Yamamoto-Nonaka K., Koike M., Asanuma K., Takagi M., Oliva Trejo J. A., Seki T., et al. (2016). Cathepsin D in podocytes is important in the pathogenesis of proteinuria and CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27, 2685–2700. 10.1681/ASN.2015040366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Yasuda Y., Li Z., Greenbaum D., Bogyo M., Weber E., Brömme D. (2004). Cathepsin V, a novel and potent elastolytic activity expressed in activated macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 36761–36770. 10.1074/jbc.M403986200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Zhang L., Fu X. H., Yu Y., Shui R. H., Li C., Zeng H. Y., et al. (2015). Treatment with CA-074Me, a Cathepsin B inhibitor, reduces lung interstitial inflammation and fibrosis in a rat model of polymyositis. Lab. Invest. 95, 65–77. 10.1038/labinvest.2014.135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES