Skip to main content
PMC home page
Physiological Reports logoLink to Physiological Reports
. 2017 Dec 21;5(24):e13526. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13526

Acute resistance exercise induces Sestrin2 phosphorylation and p62 dephosphorylation in human skeletal muscle

Nina Zeng 1, Randall F D'Souza 1, Vandre C Figueiredo 1,2, James F Markworth 1,3, Llion A Roberts 4,5, Jonathan M Peake 5,6, Cameron J Mitchell 1, David Cameron‐Smith 1,7,8,✉
PMCID: PMC5742699  PMID: 29263116

Abstract

Sestrins (1, 2, 3) are a family of stress‐inducible proteins capable of attenuating oxidative stress, regulating metabolism, and stimulating autophagy. Sequestosome1 (p62) is also a stress‐inducible multifunctional protein acting as a signaling hub for oxidative stress and selective autophagy. It is unclear whether Sestrin and p62Ser403 are regulated acutely or chronically by resistance exercise (RE) or training (RT) in human skeletal muscle. Therefore, the acute and chronic effects of RE on Sestrin and p62 in human skeletal muscle were examined through two studies. In Study 1, nine active men (22.1 ± 2.2 years) performed a bout of single‐leg strength exercises and muscle biopsies were collected before, 2, 24, and 48 h after exercise. In Study 2, 10 active men (21.3 ± 1.9 years) strength trained for 12 weeks (2 days per week) and biopsies were collected pre‐ and post‐training. Acutely, 2 h postexercise, phosphorylation of p62Ser403 was downregulated, while there was a mobility shift of Sestrin2, indicative of increased phosphorylation. Forty‐eight hours postexercise, the protein expression of both Sestrin1 and total p62 increased. Chronic exercise had no impact on the gene or protein expression of Sestrin2/3 or p62, but Sestrin1 protein was upregulated. These findings demonstrated an inverse relationship between Sestrin2 and p62 phosphorylation after a single bout of RE, indicating they are transiently regulated. Contrarily, 12 weeks of RT increased protein expression of Sestrin1, suggesting that despite the strong sequence homology of the Sestrin family, they are differentially regulated in response to acute RE and chronic RT.

Keywords: Exercise training, p62Ser403, resistance exercise, sequestosome1, Sestrin, skeletal muscle

Introduction

Physical activity, particularly resistance exercise (RE), is an intense muscle stressor that stimulates adaptive regulation of numerous nutrient and antioxidant‐sensitive pathways (Egan and Zierath 2013). Although mechanisms regulating muscle protein synthesis have been well studied (Dreyer et al. 2006), the complex signaling pathways regulating autophagy in response to RE (Fry et al. 2012) and RE‐induced oxidative stress (Çakır‐Atabek et al. 2015) remain elusive.

Sestrins are a family of stress‐inducible proteins that have multifunctional roles including attenuating oxidative stress, regulating mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), and stimulating autophagy (Lee et al. 2013). Mammals have three Sestrin genes (SESN1/2/3) that are regulated differently. Although Sestrin1 and 2 are regulated by p53, Sestrin3 is regulated by forkhead box O (FOXO) (Parmigiani and Budanov 2016). Sestrin2 shows intrinsic oxidoreductase activity (Budanov et al. 2004); however, it was later shown that this is not required for its antioxidant functioning (Woo et al. 2009). In circumstances of increased oxidative stress, Sestrin1 and 2 prevent reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation by inducing selective autophagic degradation of Kelch‐like ECH‐associated protein (Keap1), an inhibitor of the nuclear factor (erythroid‐derived 2)‐like 2 (Nrf2), thereby upregulating Nrf2‐dependent antioxidant gene transcription (Bae et al. 2013). Sestrin2 has also been proposed as a leucine sensor (Parmigiani et al. 2014; Wolfson et al. 2016) and in vitro analysis has identified it as a phosphoprotein, which in response to leucine deprivation, is phosphorylated and interacts with GTPase‐activating protein activity toward Rags 2 (GATOR2) to inhibit mTORC1 activity (Kim et al. 2015; Kimball et al. 2016). Sestrin3, however, is upregulated in the skeletal muscle of type 2 diabetic patients (Nascimento et al. 2013) and maintains insulin sensitivity in overfed mice via protein kinase B (Tao et al. 2015).

p62 is a stress‐inducible protein involved in oxidative stress and autophagic clearance of polyubiquitinated proteins (Katsuragi et al. 2015). Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process that recycles protein aggregates and malfunctioning organelles. Macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone‐mediated autophagy are the three main forms of autophagy (Tanida 2011). p62 plays an important role in selective macroautophagic protein degradation. It binds to ubiquitinated proteins and microtubule‐associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), allowing it to recruit these proteins to autophagosomes, which fuse with lysosomes for protein degradation (Lamark et al. 2009). It has been shown that phosphorylation of p62 at Serine 403 (Ser403) plays a critical role in selective macroautophagy, because phosphorylating p62Ser403 stabilizes the association between p62 and ubiquitinated protein, which enables efficient autophagosome formation (Matsumoto et al. 2011).

Included in the complex functionality of Sestrin2 is its interaction with p62 (Ro et al. 2014). In vitro, Sestrin2 associates with p62 and Unc‐51‐like protein kinase 1 (ULK1), forming a complex that induces ULK1 to phosphorylate p62Ser403 (Ro et al. 2014). Phosphorylated p62Ser403 enhances its binding affinity to Keap1 (Matsumoto et al. 2011), thereby initiating autophagosome formation around the cargos, which ultimately leads to selective autophagic degradation of Keap1, hence freeing Nrf2 and enabling its translocation to the nucleus to upregulate antioxidant gene expression (Ichimura et al. 2013).

Sestrins are also critical regulators of muscle aging (Budanov et al. 2010). Genetic ablation of Drosophila Sestrin (dSesn) induces the early onset of skeletal muscle degeneration and accumulated defective mitochondria (Lee et al. 2010). Resistance training (RT) is one of the most important strategies to prevent muscle wastage (Sanchis‐Gomar et al. 2011); however, no studies have assessed the effects of RT on Sestrin in human. To date, there is only evidence of endurance exercise increasing the protein expressions of Sestrin2 and 3 in mouse skeletal muscle which occurs in conjunction with an increase in autophagy (Liu et al. 2015; Lenhare et al. 2017). Whether the three mammalian Sestrin proteins differentially control skeletal muscle function and which plays a more important role on human muscle health is unclear. Similarly, it remains unknown whether Sestrin and p62Ser403 are regulated acutely or chronically by RE and RT, respectively, in human skeletal muscle. Therefore, this study aimed to measure how acute RE affects Sestrin2 and p62Ser403 phosphorylation and examined the effects of RE on the protein and mRNA expression of Sestrin paralogs. Separately, the chronic effects of 12 weeks of RT on Sestrin protein and mRNA expression were also investigated.

Materials and Method

Ethics approval

All participants were informed of the requirements and potential risks of the studies prior to providing their written informed consent. The experimental procedures adhered to the standards set by the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of The University of Queensland.

Study design

Subjects in this study were a subset of a larger trial (Roberts et al. 2015). In both studies, all participants had at least 12 months of experience in strength training and were familiar with all exercises used in the studies. In the acute study, nine physically active trained men (22.1 ± 2.2 years old) completed a bout of single‐leg strength exercise. Eight repetitions maximum (RM) strength of unilateral knee extension (71 ± 12.0 kg) and unilateral 45° leg press (299 ± 44.8 kg) for both legs were assessed 4–5 days prior to experimental exercise bout. At the same time, familiarization for the single‐leg squats and walking lunge exercise were performed. On the day of the trial, the RE bout included six sets of 45° leg press and knee extensions at 8, 8, 10, 12, 10, and 10 RM, and three sets of single‐leg squats and walking lunges at 12 RM.

In the chronic study, 10 trained men (21.3 ± 1.9 years old) participated in a 12‐week lower body RT program with training twice a week, separated by 72 h. Muscle strength for training load prescription was assessed 10–14 days before the first training session. Bilateral 45° leg press (348 ± 80 kg), knee extension (88 ± 9 kg), and knee flexion (75 ± 11 kg) 1 RMs were determined. For the training session, the loads were set to include fatigue at 8, 10, and 12 RM and weights for walking lunges corresponded to a proportion of each participant's pretraining body mass (PTBM) (79.2 ± 4.4 kg). Each training session was approximately 45 min and included six sets of 45° leg press at 8, 8, 10, 12, 10, and 10 RM, and three sets of knee extension and flexion at 12 RM. Three sets of walking lunges were also performed with week 1–3 having 20% of PTBM, and an additional 5 kg added progressively every 3 weeks. Additionally, three sets of plyometrics exercises comprising countermovement drop jumps, slow eccentric squat jumps, split lunge jumps, and countermovement box jumps were performed at 50% of lunge load. In both studies, after each exercise session, participants completed active recovery by cycling on a stationary bicycle at a low, self‐selected intensity for 10 min.

To control for postexercise diet, in the acute study, participants consumed a standardized meal 2 h before the pre‐exercise biopsy and consumed 30 g of whey protein before the recovery period. The participants then fasted until the 2 h biopsy, after which they consumed another 30 g of whey protein. Muscle biopsies from the vastus lateralis were collected before, 2, 24, and 48 h postexercise. In the chronic study, biopsies were collected 4–5 days before the first training session and post‐training biopsies were collected 6–7 days after the last training session in a fasted state. All muscle samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further analysis.

Western blotting

Twenty‐five milligrams of muscle biopsies were homogenized with RIPA lysis buffer (Millipore, Temecula, CA) with added Halt™ protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA). After centrifugation, supernatants were collected and total protein concentration was determined using the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equal amounts of protein were boiled in Laemmli buffer at 95°C for 5 min. 20 μg of protein was separated by SDS‐PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Inc., CA) using the semidry Trans‐Blot Turbo™ device (Bio‐Rad). Membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies, total p62, Sestrin1 and 3 (Abcam, ab56416, ab103121, and ab97792, respectively), Sestrin2 (ProteinTech, 10795‐1‐AP), and p62Ser403 (GeneTex, GTX128171) (all at 1:1000 dilution, except Sestrin1 which is at 1:100) overnight, and the appropriate anti‐rabbit or anti‐mouse secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, PA) linked to horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were exposed on a ChemiDoc image device (Bio‐Rad) using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (ECL Select kit; GE Healthcare Ltd., Little Chalfont, UK). Bands were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Western blot data were normalized to the housekeeping protein GAPDH (Abcam, ab36840) (1: 10,000).

Sestrin2 electrophoretic mobility

To allow for resolution of Sestrin2 into multiple electrophoretic forms as previously demonstrated in Kimball et al. (2016), samples were electrophoresed through 8% polyacrylamide gels (acrylamide‐bis‐acrylamide, 19:1). When human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293) were incubated in complete medium, Sestrin2 separated into three bands: α, β, and γ. However, when incubated in leucine‐deficient medium, there was a mobility shift of the protein, resulting in the appearance of a slower migrating δ band (Kimball et al. 2016). To provide evidence that the multiple electrophoretic bands represented different phosphorylated forms of Sestrin2, Kimball et al. treated samples with lambda protein phosphatase, which led to a shift in the migration of Sestrin2 into a single band, suggesting additional bands represented multiple phosphorylated forms of the protein. Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitates of endogenous Sestrin2 further confirmed it as a phosphoprotein as three phosphorylation sites, Thr232, Ser249, and Ser279, were identified (Kimball et al. 2016). In the present study, to measure the intensity of Sestrin2 phosphorylation, the abundance of the slowest migrating δ form of Sestrin2 was taken as phosphorylation. It is known that phosphorylation results in the protein migrating at a higher, apparent molecular mass (Wegener and Jones 1984; Peck 2006). Total Sestrin2 protein was recorded as the expression of all forms of Sestrin2 (δ, γ, β, and α form).

RNA extraction and quantitative real‐time PCR

Following the manufacturer's instructions from the AllPrep® DNA/RNA/miRNA Universal Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), total RNA was extracted from 20 mg of muscle biopsies. 1500 ng of input RNA was then used for cDNA synthesis using High‐Capacity RNA‐to‐cDNA™ kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Messenger RNA (mRNA) was measured by RT‐PCR on a LightCycler 480 II (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) using SYBR Green I Master Mix (Roche Applied Science). Target mRNAs were SESN1, SESN2, SESN3, and p62. Primers were designed using BLAST software (Ye et al. 2012) with sequences in Table 1. Relative fold changes were determined using the 2−ΔΔCT method (Schmittgen and Livak 2008). To compare the basal expression levels of the different Sestrin paralogs, 2−ΔCT was used. The geometric mean of three reference genes was used for normalization (Vandesompele et al. 2002). The recently proposed human reference genes (Eisenberg and Levanon 2013), chromosome 1 open reading frame 43 (C1orf43), charged multivesicular body protein 2A (CHMP2A), and ER membrane protein complex subunit 7 (EMC7) were identified as the least variable and used as reference genes (Table 1).

Table 1.

mRNA sequences

Gene Sequence
CHMP2A (forward) CGCTATGTGCGCAAGTTTGT
CHMP2A (reverse) GGGGCAACTTCAGCTGTCTG
C1orf43 (forward) CTATGGGACAGGGGTCTTTGG
C1orf43 (reverse) TTTGGCTGCTGACTGGTGAT
EMC7 (forward) GGGCTGGACAGACTTTCTAATG
EMC7 (reverse) CTCCATTTCCCGTCTCATGTCAG
SESN1 (forward) TTTCGTGTCCAGGACTATTGC
SESN1 (reverse) ACTGTCCCACATCTGGATAAAGG
SESN2 (forward) CAACCTCTTCTGGAGGCACTT
SESN2 (reverse) CCTGCTCAGGAGTCAGGTCA
SESN3 (forward) CAGGCAGCAACTTTGGGATTGT
SESN3 (reverse) AGACGCCTCTTCATCTTCCCTT
p62 (forward) GAATCAGCTTCTGGTCCATCGG
p62 (reverse) GCTTCTTTTCCCTCCGTGCT
Open in a new tab

Forward and reverse sequences of analyzed genes.

Statistical analysis

To measure differences across time in the acute study, one‐way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SigmaPlot (Systat 218 Software Inc., San Jose). Holm–Sidak post hoc tests were used where appropriate to compare postexercise values to baseline with significance set at P < 0.05. For the chronic study, time differences were conducted using a paired Student's t test. To compare the basal differences of all three Sestrins, one‐way ANOVA was used. All values are presented as means ± SEM.

Results

Acute exercise

Sestrin2 phosphorylation (assessed by the mobility shift of the δ band) was higher 2 h after exercise (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1A), whereas the phosphorylation of p62Ser403 was reduced 2 h after exercise (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1E). No difference was observed in the total protein expression of Sestrin2 (Fig. 1B), but its mRNA expression (SESN2) increased 2 h postexercise (P = 0.015) (Fig. 2A). There were no changes in the mRNA expressions of SESN1, SESN3, and p62 (Fig. 2B–D), and protein expression of Sestrin3 (Fig. 1D). However, the protein expression of Sestrin1 and total p62 increased 48 h postexercise (P = 0.025 and P = 0.031, respectively) (Fig. 1C and F). Basal mRNA expression of SESN1 was significantly more abundant than SESN2 (P < 0.001) or SESN3 (P = 0.043). SESN3 was also more abundant than SESN2 (P = 0.043) (Fig. 3A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Effects of acute resistance exercise on Sestrin and p62 protein. The relative abundance of Sestrin2 in δ form (A), total Sestrin2 protein (B), Sestrin1 protein (C), Sestrin3 protein (D), phosphorylation status of p62Ser403 (E), and total p62 protein (F) following acute RE. Representative western blots (G). Data are expressed as fold change from rest and error bars represent SEM. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 versus respective baseline samples.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Effects of acute resistance exercise on mRNA expression. The mRNA expression of SESN2 (A), SESN1 (B), SESN3 (C), and p62 (D). Data are expressed as fold change from rest and error bars represent SEM. *P < 0.05 versus respective baseline samples.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Basal expression of Sestrin paralogs. The basal mRNA expression of SESN1, 2, 3 in the acute (A) and chronic (B) study. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ***Difference between SESN1 and SESN2 (P < 0.001). #Difference between SESN1 and SESN3 (P < 0.05). ФDifference between SESN3 and SESN2 (P < 0.05).

Chronic exercise

The phosphorylation states of Sestrin2 and p62 were unchanged following RT (Fig. 4A and E). Also, no changes in protein and mRNA expressions of Sestrin2, Sestrin3, and total p62 were observed (Fig. 4B, D, and F). However, Sestrin1 protein was increased with RT (P = 0.026) (Fig. 4C). Similar to the acute study, prior to training, the mRNA expression of SESN1 was significantly more abundant than SESN2 (P < 0.001). SESN3 was also more abundant than SESN2 (P = 0.05) (Fig. 3B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effects of chronic resistance training on Sestrin and p62 protein. The relative abundance of Sestrin2 in δ form (A), total Sestrin2 protein (B), Sestrin1 protein (C), Sestrin3 protein (D), phosphorylation status of p62Ser403 (E), and total p62 protein (F). Representative western blots (G). Data are expressed as fold change from rest and error bars represent SEM. *P < 0.05 versus respective baseline samples.

Discussion

The present study confirmed the role of Sestrin2 as a phosphoprotein (Ro et al. 2014; Kimball et al. 2016; Nikonorova et al. 2017) and extended previous findings to show it is responsive to acute RE in human skeletal muscle. There was an electrophoretic mobility shift resulting in increased abundance of a slower migrating δ band of Sestrin2, indicative of increased phosphorylation acutely following RE. Mirroring the time course of increased Sestrin2 phosphorylation, p62Ser403 phosphorylation was transiently downregulated following RE. After 12 weeks of RT, resting total protein abundance and basal phosphorylation of Sestrin2 and p62 were unaltered. However, there was an increased Sestrin1 protein abundance, suggesting that despite the strong sequence homology of the Sestrin family, they are differentially regulated in response to RE and RT.

Effect of acute exercise

Following RE, mRNA expression of SESN2 increased 2 h postexercise. Exposure of primary human myotubes to reactive oxygen species (H2O2) for 6 h also increased mRNA expression of SESN2 (Nascimento et al. 2013). Although RE is primarily an anabolic stimulus, it has been shown to be a potent inducer of acute oxidative stress (Polotow et al. 2017). Sestrins protect cells from oxidative stress and cellular damage, as their repression upregulated ROS production and induced genetic instability (Kopnin et al. 2007). The upregulation of SESN2 postexercise may be an adaptation to protect skeletal muscle cells from exercise‐induced oxidative stress.

There was also an increase in the relative amount of Sestrin2 present in the heavier δ band at 2 h, returning to pre‐exercise levels by 24 h. Sestrin2 has been proposed as a leucine sensor (Parmigiani et al. 2014; Wolfson et al. 2016). In HEK293, increased leucine concentrations in the media resulted in a reduction of the relative amount of the δ band, which promoted mTORC1 activation, as assessed by an increase in phosphorylation of p70S6K1Thr389 (Kimball et al. 2016). In this study, participants consumed 30 g of whey protein before the recovery period. A reduction of the δ band should be expected; however, no inverse relationship between Sestrin2 phosphorylation and mTORC1 activation was observed. Conversely, the intensity of the δ band increased and p70S6K1Thr389 was highly phosphorylated 2 h postexercise as demonstrated previously (Roberts et al. 2015). The discrepancy could be due to different tissue types and stimuli, as exercise is an intense muscle stressor that affects multiple pathways (Egan and Zierath 2013). Furthermore, there is limited evidence demonstrating action of leucine on Sestrin function in cells other than HEK293 and mouse fibroblasts (Chantranupong et al. 2014; Parmigiani et al. 2014; Wolfson et al. 2016). Thus, the nature of Sestrin2 leucine sensor properties is still under debate (Lee et al. 2016; Saxton et al. 2016). Therefore, future studies should aim to separate feeding or exercise stimuli with the aim of providing more insight into the possible in vivo functioning of Sestrin2 phosphorylation.

In contrast to Sestrin2 phosphorylation, p62Ser403 phosphorylation was repressed 2 h postexercise. Under in vitro conditions, the association between Sestrin2, p62, and ULK1 promotes ULK1‐mediated p62Ser403 phosphorylation, resulting in selective degradation of polyubiquitinated cargos, such as Keap1 (Matsumoto et al. 2011; Ro et al. 2014). Degradation of Keap1 allows Nrf2 to be translocated to the nucleus to upregulate antioxidant gene expression (Ichimura et al. 2013). The acute postexercise dephosphorylation of p62Ser403 observed in the current study could be suggestive of diminished ubiquitin‐mediated selective macroautophagic protein degradation. Furthermore, in agreement with the current study, RE has been shown to upregulate total p62, 24 and 48 h following exercise (Ogborn et al. 2015), indicating that acute RE might be suppressing macroautophagy, as p62 accumulates when autophagy is inhibited (Mizushima et al. 2010). Additionally, by measuring the conversion of cytosolic microtubule‐associated protein 1 (LC3B‐I) to the autophagosomal membrane‐associated form, LC3B‐II, a marker of enhanced autophagy, it was demonstrated that macroautophagy was depressed in both young and old adults following an acute bout of RE (Glynn et al. 2010; Fry et al. 2012).

p62 has been found to be induced at the transcriptional level by ROS under cellular stress (Jain et al. 2010), therefore to evaluate the role of Sestrin2 and p62 in regulating oxidative stress, future studies should explore oxidative stress markers, Keap1 degradation, Nrf2 upregulation, and antioxidant response. As exercise influences multiple pathways, the present data does not allow for strong mechanistic conclusions regarding the role of Sestrin2 phosphorylation in regulating p62Ser403 phosphorylation and its implication in redox homeostasis and selective autophagy. Due to limited available muscle tissues, coimmunoprecipitation analyses were not undertaken, making it unclear whether there was a functional association between Sestrin2 and p62. Furthermore, a limitation of the study was a lack of control for feeding at the 24 and 48 h biopsies collections, which could have affected the result observed at these time points. Future studies should investigate the physical association between Sestrin2 and p62 and control for feeding at all time points. The present study demonstrated that following RE, a clear inverse relationship between the phosphorylation status of Sestrin2 and p62Ser403 exists, and they are transiently regulated after RE, which may play a role in cellular adaptation in human skeletal muscle.

Effect of chronic exercise

Skeletal muscle is sensitive to both acute and chronic stresses associated with RE and RT. The mechanisms associated with the acute transient response to RE might be different compared to chronic adaptation which are measured in the rested state, since these responses are influenced by multiple factors including frequency of exercise, recovery period, and training history of individuals (Abernethy et al. 1994). Literature on the relationship of Sestrin and exercise is limited. The current understanding is a single bout of aerobic exercise increased Sestrin2 protein in mice (Lenhare et al. 2017), while long‐term endurance exercise increased the protein expression of Sestrin2 and 3 and basal level of muscle autophagy (Liu et al. 2015). In this study, long‐term RT for 12 weeks did not alter the protein or mRNA expression of Sestrin2, 3, and total p62, or the basal phosphorylation status of Sestrin2 and p62Ser403. This could be due to the use of different exercise protocol, since different modes of exercise produce distinct myofiber adaptations, while RT increases strength and muscle fiber cross‐sectional area, endurance exercise improves oxidative metabolism by increasing mitochondrial content and capillary densities (Wilkinson et al. 2008). Interestingly, the protein expression of Sestrin1 increased significantly following RT and also 48 h following RE. However, direct comparison between the acute and chronic effects on Sestrin1 cannot be made, since fasting biopsies were collected in the present chronic study, while in the acute study, biopsies were collected in the fed state.

In agreement with a previous study, compared with Sestrin2 and 3, Sestrin1 is more abundantly expressed in skeletal muscle (Peeters et al. 2003). Silencing of Sestrin1 in human embryonic fibroblasts inhibited cell proliferation and accelerated cell senescence due to excess ROS production (Budanov et al. 2004). Moreover, studies from drosophila and mouse models provided a connection between Sestrins and muscle growth, as knockout of Sestrin resulted in muscle degeneration (Lee et al. 2010). Additionally, silencing Sestrin3 in human myotubes increased myostatin expression, which is a negative regulator of muscle growth (Nascimento et al. 2013). Recruited subjects demonstrated an increase in both strength and muscle mass after 12 weeks of training (Roberts et al. 2015). Taken together, these observations suggest a potential link between Sestrin1 and the regulation of cell growth, which warrants further investigation to clarify the distinct roles played by each Sestrin family members in human skeletal muscle.

Conclusion

Sestrin and p62 are multifunctional proteins involved in many cellular processes, including suppressing oxidative stress, mTORC1, and autophagy regulation (Katsuragi et al. 2015; Parmigiani and Budanov 2016). The present analysis demonstrated that while Sestrin family members share considerable sequence homology, each is regulated independently in response to RE. Sestrin3 was not affected by RE, whereas long‐term training induced the protein expression of Sestrin1. In response to RE, there was a transient mobility shift of Sestrin2, indicative of increased phosphorylation. Mirroring this response, p62Ser403 phosphorylation was downregulated. It appears that both Sestrin2 and p62Ser403 are transiently regulated, and may be functionally involved in the adaptive regulatory mechanisms elicited by human skeletal muscle after intense RE.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Zeng N., D'Souza R. F., Figueiredo V. C., Markworth J. F., Roberts L. A., Peake J. M., Mitchell C. J., Cameron‐Smith D.. Acute resistance exercise induces Sestrin2 phosphorylation and p62 dephosphorylation in human skeletal muscle. Physiol Rep, 5 (24), 2017, e13526, https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13526

Funding Information

These studies were funded by research grants from the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) Research Foundation, Exercise and Sport Science Australia (ESSA) and AgResearch Limited (Nutritional strategies for an aging population).

References

  1. Abernethy, P. J. , Jürimäe J., Logan P. A., Taylor A. W., and Thayer R. E.. 1994. Acute and chronic response of skeletal muscle to resistance exercise. Sports Med. 17:22–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bae, S. H. , Sung S. H., Oh S. Y., Lim J. M., Lee S. K., Park Y. N., et al. 2013. Sestrins activate Nrf2 by promoting p62‐dependent autophagic degradation of Keap1 and prevent oxidative liver damage. Cell Metab. 17:73–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Budanov, A. V. , Sablina A. A., Feinstein E., Koonin E. V., and Chumakov P. M.. 2004. Regeneration of peroxiredoxins by p53‐regulated sestrins, homologs of bacterial AhpD. Science 304:596–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Budanov, A. V. , Lee J. H., and Karin M.. 2010. Stressin9 Sestrins take an aging fight. EMBO Mol. Med. 2:388–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Çakır‐Atabek, H. , Özdemir F., and Çolak R.. 2015. Oxidative stress and antioxidant responses to progressive resistance exercise intensity in trained and untrained males. Biol. Sport 32:321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chantranupong, L. , Wolfson R. L., Orozco J. M., Saxton R. A., Scaria S. M., Bar‐Peled L., et al. 2014. The Sestrins interact with GATOR2 to negatively regulate the amino‐acid‐sensing pathway upstream of mTORC1. Cell Rep. 9:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dreyer, H. C. , Fujita S., Cadenas J. G., Chinkes D. L., Volpi E., and Rasmussen B. B.. 2006. Resistance exercise increases AMPK activity and reduces 4E‐BP1 phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 576:613–624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Egan, B. , and Zierath J. R.. 2013. Exercise metabolism and the molecular regulation of skeletal muscle adaptation. Cell Metab. 17:162–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eisenberg, E. , and Levanon E. Y.. 2013. Human housekeeping genes, revisited. Trends Genet. 29:569–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fry, C. S. , Drummond M. J., Glynn E. L., Dickinson J. M., Gundermann D. M., Timmerman K. L., et al. 2012. Skeletal muscle autophagy and protein breakdown following resistance exercise are similar in younger and older adults. J. Gerontol. A 68:599–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Glynn, E. L. , Fry C. S., Drummond M. J., Dreyer H. C., Dhanani S., Volpi E., et al. 2010. Muscle protein breakdown has a minor role in the protein anabolic response to essential amino acid and carbohydrate intake following resistance exercise. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 299:R533–R540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ichimura, Y. , Waguri S., Y‐s Sou, Kageyama S., Hasegawa J., Ishimura R., et al. 2013. Phosphorylation of p62 activates the Keap1‐Nrf2 pathway during selective autophagy. Mol. Cell 51:618–631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jain, A. , Lamark T., Sjøttem E., Larsen K. B., Awuh J. A., Øvervatn A., et al. 2010. p62/SQSTM1 is a target gene for transcription factor NRF2 and creates a positive feedback loop by inducing antioxidant response element‐driven gene transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 285:22576–22591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Katsuragi, Y. , Ichimura Y., and Komatsu M.. 2015. p62/SQSTM1 functions as a signaling hub and an autophagy adaptor. FEBS J. 282:4672–4678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, H. , An S., Ro S.‐H., Teixeira F., Park G. J., Kim C., et al. 2015. Janus‐faced Sestrin2 controls ROS and mTOR signalling through two separate functional domains. Nat. Commun. 6:10025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kimball, S. R. , Gordon B. S., Moyer J. E., Dennis M. D., and Jefferson L. S.. 2016. Leucine induced dephosphorylation of Sestrin2 promotes mTORC1 activation. Cell. Signal. 28:896–906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kopnin, P. B. , Agapova L. S., Kopnin B. P., and Chumakov P. M.. 2007. Repression of sestrin family genes contributes to oncogenic Ras‐induced reactive oxygen species up‐regulation and genetic instability. Can. Res. 67:4671–4678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lamark, T. , Kirkin V., Dikic I., and Johansen T.. 2009. NBR1 and p62 as cargo receptors for selective autophagy of ubiquitinated targets. Cell Cycle 8:1986–1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, J. H. , Budanov A. V., Park E. J., Birse R., Kim T. E., Perkins G. A., et al. 2010. Sestrin as a feedback inhibitor of TOR that prevents age‐related pathologies. Science 327:1223–1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, J. H. , Budanov A. V., and Karin M.. 2013. Sestrins orchestrate cellular metabolism to attenuate aging. Cell Metab. 18:792–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee, J. H. , Cho U.‐S., and Karin M.. 2016. Sestrin regulation of TORC1: is sestrin a leucine sensor? Sci. Signal. 9, re5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lenhare, L. , Crisol B. M., Silva V. R., Katashima C. K., Cordeiro A. V., Pereira K. D., et al. 2017. Physical exercise increases Sestrin 2 protein levels and induces autophagy in the skeletal muscle of old mice. Exp. Gerontol. 97:17–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, X. , Niu Y., Yuan H., Huang J., and Fu L.. 2015. AMPK binds to Sestrins and mediates the effect of exercise to increase insulin‐sensitivity through autophagy. Metabolism 64:658–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matsumoto, G. , Wada K., Okuno M., Kurosawa M., and Nukina N.. 2011. Serine 403 phosphorylation of p62/SQSTM1 regulates selective autophagic clearance of ubiquitinated proteins. Mol. Cell 44:279–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mizushima, N. , Yoshimori T., and Levine B.. 2010. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 140:313–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nascimento, E. B. , Osler M. E., and Zierath J. R.. 2013. Sestrin 3 regulation in type 2 diabetic patients and its influence on metabolism and differentiation in skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 305:E1408–E1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nikonorova, I. A. , Al‐Baghdadi R. J., Mirek E. T., Wang Y., Goudie M. P., Wetstein B. B., et al. 2017. Obesity challenges the hepatoprotective function of the integrated stress response to asparaginase exposure in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 292:6786–6798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ogborn, D. I. , McKay B. R., Crane J. D., Safdar A., Akhtar M., Parise G., et al. 2015. Effects of age and unaccustomed resistance exercise on mitochondrial transcript and protein abundance in skeletal muscle of men. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 308:R734–R741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Parmigiani, A. , and Budanov A.. 2016. Chapter one‐sensing the environment through sestrins: implications for cellular metabolism. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 327:1–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Parmigiani, A. , Nourbakhsh A., Ding B., Wang W., Kim Y. C., Akopiants K., et al. 2014. Sestrins inhibit mTORC1 kinase activation through the GATOR complex. Cell Rep. 9:1281–1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peck, S. C. 2006. Analysis of protein phosphorylation: methods and strategies for studying kinases and substrates. Plant J. 45:512–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peeters, H. , Debeer P., Bairoch A., Wilquet V., Huysmans C., Parthoens E., et al. 2003. PA26 is a candidate gene for heterotaxia in humans: identification of a novel PA26‐related gene family in human and mouse. Hum. Genet. 112:573–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Polotow, T. G. , Souza‐Junior T. P., Sampaio R. C., Okuyama A. R., Ganini D., Vardaris C. V., et al. 2017. Effect of 1 repetition maximum, 80% repetition maximum, and 50% repetition maximum strength exercise in trained individuals on variations in plasma Redox biomarkers. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 31:2489–2497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ro, S. H. , Semple I. A., Park H., Park H., Park H. W., Kim M., et al. 2014. Sestrin2 promotes Unc‐51‐like kinase 1 mediated phosphorylation of p62/sequestosome‐1. FEBS J. 281:3816–3827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Roberts, L. A. , Raastad T., Markworth J. F., Figueiredo V. C., Egner I. M., Shield A., et al. 2015. Post‐exercise cold water immersion attenuates acute anabolic signalling and long‐term adaptations in muscle to strength training. J. Physiol. 593:4285–4301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanchis‐Gomar, F. , Gómez‐Cabrera M. C., and Viña J.. 2011. The loss of muscle mass and sarcopenia: non hormonal intervention. Exp. Gerontol. 46:967–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Saxton, R. A. , Knockenhauer K. E., Schwartz T. U., and Sabatini D. M.. 2016. The apo‐structure of the leucine sensor Sestrin2 is still elusive. Sci. Signal. 9, ra92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schmittgen, T. D. , and Livak K. J.. 2008. Analyzing real‐time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 3:1101–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tanida, I. 2011. Autophagosome formation and molecular mechanism of autophagy. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 14:2201–2214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tao, R. , Xiong X., Liangpunsakul S., and Dong X. C.. 2015. Sestrin 3 protein enhances hepatic insulin sensitivity by direct activation of the mTORC2‐Akt signaling. Diabetes 64:1211–1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vandesompele, J. , De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Van Roy N., De Paepe A., et al. 2002. Accurate normalization of real‐time quantitative RT‐PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3, research0034‐1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wegener, A. , and Jones L.. 1984. Phosphorylation‐induced mobility shift in phospholamban in sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gels. Evidence for a protein structure consisting of multiple identical phosphorylatable subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 259:1834–1841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wilkinson, S. B. , Phillips S. M., Atherton P. J., Patel R., Yarasheski K. E., Tarnopolsky M. A., et al. 2008. Differential effects of resistance and endurance exercise in the fed state on signalling molecule phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human muscle. J. Physiol. 586:3701–3717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wolfson, R. L. , Chantranupong L., Saxton R. A., Shen K., Scaria S. M., Cantor J. R., et al. 2016. Sestrin2 is a leucine sensor for the mTORC1 pathway. Science 351:43–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Woo, H. A. , Bae S. H., Park S., and Rhee S. G.. 2009.  Sestrin 2 is not a reductase for cysteine sulfinic acid of peroxiredoxins. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11:739–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ye, J. , Coulouris G., Zaretskaya I., Cutcutache I., Rozen S., and Madden T. L.. 2012. Primer‐BLAST: a tool to design target‐specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinf. 13:134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physiological Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES