Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2017 Dec 26;56(1):e01245-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01245-17

Evaluation of the SpeeDx ResistancePlus MG Diagnostic Test for Mycoplasma genitalium on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Quantitative PCR Platform

Jenny P Su a,b, Lit Y Tan c, Suzanne M Garland a,b,d, Sepehr N Tabrizi a,b,d, Elisa Mokany c, Samantha Walker c, Catriona S Bradshaw e,f, Tim Read e, Gerald L Murray a,b,g,h,
Editor: Andrew B Onderdonki
PMCID: PMC5744202  PMID: 29093102

LETTER

Mycoplasma genitalium is a sexually transmitted bacterium that causes urethritis in men and is associated with potentially serious sequelae in women (1). The levels of antibiotic resistance to the first-line (azithromycin) and second-line (moxifloxacin) treatments are high and increasing (2, 3). Two commercial nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of M. genitalium were recently released, the Hologic (Bedford, MA, USA) Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium (4) and SpeeDx (Sydney, Australia) ResistancePlus MG (5) tests.

In a single multiplexed reaction, the ResistancePlus MG assay reports both the detection of M. genitalium and the presence/absence of five macrolide resistance mutations in the 23S rRNA gene, facilitating individualization of antimicrobial therapy. The ResistancePlus MG test has been validated by the Roche LightCycler 480 II real-time PCR system (LC480) (5, 6). The aim of this study was to evaluate the SpeeDx ResistancePlus MG (550) diagnostic kit (Sydney, Australia) on the Applied Biosystems 7500 (ABI 7500) Fast platform, a commonly used diagnostic quantitative PCR (qPCR) platform.

A retrospective analysis was performed on samples collected from 1 May 2016 to 21 June 2016 (initially tested by 16S rRNA gene qPCR, including quantitation [7]). All positive samples (n = 111) and a random selection of negative samples (n = 100) were included in this study. Sample types included urine and swabs (anorectal, vaginal, cervical/endocervical, urethral) and originated from The Royal Women's Hospital (Melbourne, Australia), the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, or external referrals. Samples were previously extracted on the MagNA Pure 96 (Roche) for diagnostic purposes and extracts stored at −30°C. For the test assay, reaction mixtures (20-μl final volume) were assembled with 5 μl of sample and the Plex Mastermix from the ResistancePlus MG (550) diagnostic kit, before analysis on the ABI 7500 Fast platform. Cycling consisted of 95°C for 2 min, followed by 10 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 61°C for 30 s (−0.5°C per cycle) and 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 52°C for 40 s. Detection occurred in three channels: (i) the FAM channel (FAM [6-carboxyfluorescein] dye, 495 to 520 nm) for detection of M. genitalium through the MgPa gene, (ii) the JOE channel (JOE [6-carboxy-4′,5′-dichloro-2′,7′-dimethoxyfluorescein] dye, 529 to 555 nm) for detection of five 23S rRNA gene mutations (A2058G/C/T, A2059G/C), and (iii) the TAMRA (6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine) channel (Atto 550 dye, 554 to 576 nm) extrinsic internal control. A synthetic DNA standard of known concentration was included in all experiments. The results were compared to results from two in-house methods at the Royal Women's Hospital (16S rRNA gene qPCR [7] and Sanger sequencing of the 23S rRNA gene amplified by conventional PCR [8]) (comparator assay 1) and the ResistancePlus MG assay performed on the LC480 (comparator assay 2) (6). This study was approved by the Royal Women's Hospital Human Research and Ethics Committees.

Twenty-nine samples were disregarded due to insufficient sample volume or DNA degradation during storage (9). For the remaining 182 samples, there was high concordance for detection of M. genitalium organisms (98.9%) between the ResistancePlus MG assay performed on the ABI 7500 platform and by comparator assay 1 (kappa value of 0.98, 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.947 to 1.000), with 98.0% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity (Table 1). Two discrepant samples for M. genitalium detection (positive by the in-house assay, negative by the SpeeDx assay) had a low M. genitalium load of fewer than 10 genomes/5 μl of extract at the detection limit. For 97 positive samples (67 mutant, 30 wild-type samples), the test assay had a mutation detection sensitivity of 92.5% (95%CI, 83.4 to 97.6%) and a specificity of 100% (95%CI, 88.4 to 100%), with a high kappa value of 0.885 (95%CI, 0.787 to 0.982) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

ResistancePlus MG kit detection of M. genitalium and 23S rRNA gene mutations with the ABI 7500 qPCR platforma

PCR platform Test result No. of samples with M. genitalium 16S qPCR reference test result:
No. of samples with 23S rRNA mutation Sanger sequencing reference test resultb:
+ve −ve Mutation +vec Mutation −ve
SpeeDx ABI 7500 +ve 99 0 62 0
−ve 2d 81 5 30
Total 101 81 67 30
a

+ve, positive; −ve, negative.

b

Analysis of 97 M. genitalium-positive samples. Sequencing results for two samples were unavailable due to a failed sequencing run.

c

Mutations (n = 67) included A2058G (n = 23), A2058T (n = 4), and A2059G (n = 40).

d

Fewer than 10 genomes/5 μl of extract were detected in the samples when discrepant analysis was performed by repeating the in-house 16S qPCR.

The clinical performance of the ResistancePlus MG assay on the ABI 7500 platform was very similar to that of the LC480 platform (comparator assay 2). Direct comparison showed agreements of 99.4% (95%CI, 0.969 to 0.999) and a κ of 0.99 (95%CI, 0.967 to 1.000) for the detection of M. genitalium and agreements of 94.9% (95%CI, 0.885-0.978) and a κ of 0.89 (95%CI, 0.797 to 0.985) for 23S rRNA mutation detection.

In conclusion, the ResistancePlus MG (550) kit using the ABI 7500 platform had a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of both M. genitalium and 23S rRNA mutations that may confer macrolide resistance. The availability of this test on the ABI 7500 platform, which is widely used in Europe, will greatly increase the accessibility of this assay for diagnostic laboratories, further assisting clinicians in selecting suitable antibiotics for effective treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by an Innovations Connections Grant from the Australian Government. We acknowledge the support of SpeeDx in providing the detection kits for the assays.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. 2015. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 61:418–426. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lau A, Bradshaw CS, Lewis D, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Kong FY, Hocking JS. 2015. The efficacy of azithromycin for the treatment of genital Mycoplasma genitalium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 61:1389–1399. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Murray GL, Bradshaw CS, Bissessor M, Danielewski J, Twin J, Jensen JS, Fairley CK, Garland SM. 2017. Increasing macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium. Emerg Infect Dis 23:809–812. doi: 10.3201/eid2305.161745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tabrizi SN, Costa AM, Su J, Lowe P, Bradshaw CS, Fairley CK, Garland SM. 2016. Evaluation of the Hologic Panther transcription-mediated amplification assay for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol 54:2201–2203. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01038-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tabrizi SN, Tan LY, Walker S, Twin J, Poljak M, Bradshaw CS, Fairley CK, Bissessor M, Mokany E, Todd AV, Garland SM. 2016. Multiplex assay for simultaneous detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and macrolide resistance using PlexZyme and PlexPrime technology. PLoS One 11:e0156740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tabrizi SN, Su J, Bradshaw CS, Fairley CK, Walker S, Tan LY, Mokany E, Garland SM. 2017. Prospective evaluation of ResistancePlus MG, a new multiplex qPCR assay for the detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and macrolide resistance. J Clin Microbiol 55:1915–1919. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02312-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Twin J, Taylor N, Garland SM, Hocking JS, Walker J, Bradshaw CS, Fairley CK, Tabrizi SN. 2011. Comparison of two Mycoplasma genitalium real-time PCR detection methodologies. J Clin Microbiol 49:1140–1142. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02328-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Twin J, Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Garland SM, Fairley CK, Min LY, Tabrizi SN. 2012. Transmitted and selected macrolide resistance detected in Mycoplasma genitalium infections using rapid high resolution melt analysis. PLoS One 7:e35593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carlsen KH, Jensen JS. 2010. Mycoplasma genitalium PCR: does freezing of specimens affect sensitivity? J Clin Microbiol 48:3624–3627. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00232-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES