Sir
We would like to thank Ms. Payne et al. for their comments on our recent articles (1-3). We agree that the normative values our studies generated for the BREAST-Q will serve as a valuable tool for on-going and future research. We would also like to thank the authors for comparing all three recent studies, and looking for similarities and differences between the data. A notable difference that they commented on is the difference in scores for the Physical Well-being domain across the three different pre-operative BREAST-Q modules.
Each BREAST-Q module, Reconstruction, Augmentation, and Reduction, is an independent patient-reported outcome instrument. As such, each were developed using qualitative interview data from separate disease-specific patient populations (4, 5). While there are similarities in structure, such as the concepts of interest (e.g. Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-being, etc.), the specific questions comprising each scale in the various modules are different, see Table 1 (6). The questions in the Physical Well-being module of the Reconstruction module are specific to physical symptoms experienced pre- and post-operatively by breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction. Similarly, the questions in the Physical Well-being module of the Reduction module are specific to physical symptoms experienced pre- and post-operatively by patients undergoing breast reduction. Therefore, the individuals in the different studies were answering different questions to generate the respective BREAST-Q scores, limiting the ability to compare data across studies.
Table 1. Questions from Pre-operative BREAST-Q Modules: Physical Well-being – Chest.
Reduction | Augmentation | Reconstruction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
a. | Headaches? | a. | Pain in your breast area? | a. | Pain in the muscles of your chest? |
b. | Pain in your breast area? | b. | Tightness in your breast area? | b. | Difficulty sleeping because of discomfort in your breast area? |
c. | Lack of energy? | c. | Difficulty lifting heavy objects? | c. | Tightness in your breast area? |
d. | Difficulty doing vigorous physical activities (e.g. running or exercising)? | d. | Difficulty doing vigorous physical activities (e.g. running or exercising)? | d. | Pulling in your breast area? |
e. | Feeling physically unbalanced? | e. | Difficulty lifting or moving your arms? | e. | Nagging feeling in your breast area? |
f. | Shoulder pain? | f. | Tenderness in your breast area? | ||
g. | Difficulty sleeping because of discomfort in your breast area? | g. | Sharp pains in your breast area? | ||
h. | Neck pain? | h. | Aching feeling in your breast area? | ||
i. | Painful gouges or grooves in your shoulders from your bra straps? | i. | Throbbing feeling in your breast area? | ||
j. | Feeling physically uncomfortable? | j. | Difficulty lifting or moving your arms? | ||
k. | Rashes under your breasts? | ||||
l. | Back pain? | ||||
m. | Arm pain? | ||||
n. | Pain, numbness or tingling in your hands because of your breast size? |
The exception to this is that the Mastectomy, Breast Conserving Therapy, and Reconstruction pre-operative scales are identical, as pre-operatively this is one patient population. These modules differ only post-operatively to reflect the different unique post-operative concepts of interest to each surgical sub-group. Therefore, the Reconstruction normative data generated with the common pre-operative breast cancer scales is applicable to all of the BREAST-Q breast cancer surgical sub-groups.
We would also like to thank the authors for bringing up the primary limitation of these studies: the demographics of the normative data cohorts. We agree that additional normative data generated from a more diverse population would further enrich our understanding of the BREAST-Q, and improve the use of normative data in future analyses.
Acknowledgments
Funding Sources: Funding for the study was provided from a discretionary account of Dr. Kerrigan's held by The Dartmouth Institute. The BREAST-Q is owned by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Dr. Pusic and Dr. Klassen are co-developers. They receive a portion of licensing fees when the BREAST-Q is used in industry sponsored clinical trials. Dr. Andrea Pusic received support through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.
Footnotes
Statement of Financial Interest: Drs. Mundy, Homa, and Kerrigan have no commercial associations or financial disclosures.
- Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data: All authors
- Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content: All authors
- Final approval of the version to be published: All authors
- Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: All authors
References
- 1.Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2017;139:1046e–1055e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q: Augmentation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2017;139:846–853. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Understanding the Health Burden of Macromastia: Normative Data for the BREAST-Q Reduction Module. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2017;139:846e–853e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2009;124:345–353. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pusic AL, Reavey PL, Klassen AF, Scott A, McCarthy C, Cano SJ. Measuring patient outcomes in breast augmentation: introducing the BREAST-Q Augmentation module. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2009;36:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2008.07.005. v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pusic AL, C S, Klassen AF. ePROVIDE: BREAST-Q™. [Accessed July 7, 2017]; Available at: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org/instruments/breast-q.