Abstract
Early Cambrian Pseudooides prima has been described from embryonic and post-embryonic stages of development, exhibiting long germ-band development. There has been some debate about the pattern of segmentation, but this interpretation, as among the earliest records of ecdysozoans, has been generally accepted. Here, we show that the ‘germ band’ of P. prima embryos separates along its mid axis during development, with the transverse furrows between the ‘somites’ unfolding into the polar aperture of the ten-sided theca of Hexaconularia sichuanensis, conventionally interpreted as a scyphozoan cnidarian; co-occurring post-embryonic remains of ecdysozoans are unrelated. We recognize H. sichuanensis as a junior synonym of P. prima as a consequence of identifying these two form-taxa as distinct developmental stages of the same organism. Direct development in P. prima parallels the co-occuring olivooids Olivooides, and Quadrapyrgites and Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of a novel phenotype dataset indicates that, despite differences in their tetra-, penta- and pseudo-hexa-radial symmetry, these hexangulaconulariids comprise a clade of scyphozoan medusozoans, with Arthrochites and conulariids, that all exhibit direct development from embryo to thecate polyp. The affinity of hexangulaconulariids and olivooids to extant scyphozoan medusozoans indicates that the prevalence of tetraradial symmetry and indirect development are a vestige of a broader spectrum of body-plan symmetries and developmental modes that was manifest in their early Phanerozoic counterparts.
Keywords: Pseudooides, embryo, development, Cambrian, Cnidaria, Ecdysozoa
1. Introduction
Embryos are among the earliest unequivocal animal fossil remains in the geological record and, as such, they have the potential to provide fundamental insights into the embryology of animals during the evolutionary emergence of the fundamental metazoan body plans. Unfortunately, the phylogenetic affinity and, thus, the evolutionary significance of most remain unresolved [1]. This is especially true of Pseudooides prima, originally described from spherical fossils of unknown affinity from the earliest Cambrian Kuanchuanpu Formation and equivalents from southern Shaanxi Province and northern Sichuan Province, South China [2,3]. Pseudooides fossils were subsequently interpreted as ecdysozoan embryos based on evidence of irregular spiral/radial cleavage, pinched germ bands comprising six paired, bilaterally arranged domains, interpreted to exhibit long germ-band development, and co-association with the preserved remains of post-embryonic segmented larvae that exhibit bilaterally arranged pairs of anatomical domains [4]. There has been some debate about the pattern of segmentation [5] exhibited by Pseudooides, but this interpretation, as among the oldest body fossil evidence of ecdysozoans, has been generally accepted. An early attempt to characterize the morphology of the germ band using synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM) observed that the marginal, median and inter-metameric furrows were incompletely preserved, extending only to a shallow depth within the embryos, not enclosing the metameres ventrally [5]. In an attempt to better characterize the anatomy, development, affinity and therefore the evolutionary significance of P. prima, we recovered additional material which we subjected to SEM and SRXTM characterization. Our results reveal that the ‘germ band’ of Pseudooides develops into an aperture that unfolds along the midline furrow and ‘metamere’ boundaries, resulting in a 10-sided, bilaterally symmetrical theca with a concave base. This stage mirrors the prototheca of the co-occurring Hexaconularia, a hexangulaconulariid allied to the conulariids [6], conventionally interpreted as coronate scyphozoan cnidarians [7]. Our phylogenetic analyses, which build on our interpretation of Pseudooides, support a scyphozoan affinity, allying it with a clade of direct-developing scyphozoans exhibiting diverse symmetry. This suggests that the largely tetraradial and indirect-developing extant Cnidaria are a vestige of a broader early Palaeozoic diversity.
2. Material and methods
Studied material was recovered from the early Cambrian (Fortunian, Terreneuvian) Kuanchuanpu Formation at the Shizhonggou Section in Ningqiang County, Shaanxi Province, China. At Shizhonggou, the stratigraphic distribution of P. prima falls fully within the Anabarites trisulcatus–Protohetzina anabarica Assemblage Biozone [8], falling within the span of 537–532 Ma [9]. The samples were processed by routine etching with approximately 10% technical grade acetic acid following Müller [10] and were then separated from the insoluble residue by manual picking under a binocular microscope. Collected specimens were analysed using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) and SRXTM [5]. We examined 19 specimens of Pseudooides using SRXTM at the X02DA TOMCAT beam line of Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland. Twelve of the specimens preserve internal structure and these were analysed using the AVIZO 8.0 software. The illustrated figures were assembled using Adobe Photoshop CS. All figured specimens are deposited in the Geological Museum of Peking University (GMPKU), Beijing.
The phylogenetic dataset was compiled and designed to test the phylogenetic relationships of Pseudooides and other seemingly related taxa. Previous studies have concluded that some of these early Cambrian fossils may represent crown cnidarians [11]. Taxon sampling was guided by the aim of evaluating their affinities within the diversity of this phylum. The dataset sampled six out-groups: three representative bilaterians and the three non-bilaterian phyla (Porifera, Placozoa and Ctenophora). Characters were derived from previous studies addressing apomorphies that are general to metazoans [12,13], ctenophores [14], and medusozoan [15,16] and anthozoan [17,18] cnidarians; characters describing medusozoans’ tube morphologies are derived from Mendoza-Becerril et al. [19]. We followed the original coding for all non-modified characters. Simplified characters (three states converted into binary absence/presence) were coded as ‘present’ for the different morphologies when they were not absent. The resulting matrix contains 47 taxa coded for 214 characters.
The phylogenetic analysis was undertaken using MrBayes (Windows v. 3.2) under the Mkv model (invgamma rates, variable coding). The analysis was run twice to assess convergence. Each replicate had four chains running for 10 million generations. Both runs reached convergence (based on criteria established in the MrBayes manual) before the 10 million generations and produced the same topology albeit with minor differences in posterior probabilities.
3. Results
Our SRXTM analyses reveal that the furrows between the adjacent metameres are not incompletely preserved but, rather, extend continuously as a single folded layer of presumed ectoderm (figures 1–4). The ectoderm within the marginal furrows exhibits repeated longitudinal folding (figures 1f–h and 3b–i); at its deepest, at the ends of the ‘germ band’ (figure 3c–i), the furrow ectoderm exhibits up to five folds that converge, reducing in number and becoming more tightly folded, as the furrow approaches the ‘pinch’ at mid-length (figure 3g–i). The ‘inter-metameric’ furrows are largely surface features that have minimal depth (figure 3b), extending laterally before the delineation of the ‘germ band’ (cf. figures 1a–d and 2a–d). In most specimens, the median longitudinal furrow is narrow in width (approx. 2 µm) and varies in depth between specimens due to preservational differences (figures 1f–h and 3c). Maximally, the median furrow extends 71 µm, approximately vertically into the embryo, converging at depth from an average width of 2 µm at the surface. The digital cast of the furrow is smooth and has open convolutions that diminish with depth (figures 1f–h and 3a). Internally, the embryo is otherwise composed of homogeneous calcium phosphate mineral (figure 3b,c), reflecting diagenetic cements filling voids remaining after the initial mineralization of biological structures and decay of organics; this void-filling phase is not apparent in all specimens (e.g. figure 4h).
The absence of a distinct central surface to the ‘metameres’ is not incompatible with their interpretation as comprising a germ band. However, the deep extension of the median furrow depth is not expected because it suggests that this longitudinal border is not equivalent to the transverse ‘metamere’ boundaries. This distinction is borne out in specimens in which the median furrow shows greater degrees of expansion, and paired ‘metameres’ are separated (figure 4), in some specimens revealing a finite margin to the putative ectoderm layer (figure 4a–e). The unfolding of marginal furrows in some specimens, especially at both ends of the ‘germ band’, is also observed (figure 4f–h). These suggest that the putative ‘germ band’ is, rather, an aperture onto the interior of the embryo, and the transverse and marginal ‘metamere’ furrows represent foldings of this aperture. In a partially broken specimen (figure 4f–h), the ventral margin of the median furrow has evaginated and its distinct margins are exposed; the folded triangular poles of this aperture are no longer adpressed to, and aligned with, the spherical surface of the embryo.
The abapertural pole of the embryos often exhibits a longitudinal concavity in the ectoderm, up to 20% radius depth, with marginal wrinkles or furrows, and a scratch with diameter ranging from 30 to 100 µm in the middle, all aligned parallel to the aperture (figures 1e–h and 2e,j). These structures are not the same as a previously described blastopore [5], which is a preservational artefact and not an original biological structure. This abapertural concavity is associated with the lateral flattening of the embryo, and although it could be a taphonomic feature, its alignment with the long axis of the aperture suggests that it is biological and reflects development.
This pattern of embryonic development of Pseudooides is compatible with the post-embryonic development of the putative scyphozoan cnidarian Hexaconularia (figure 5), which occurs in the same samples as Pseudooides [8]. The earliest developmental stages in our collections of Hexaconularia, preserved as the base of the polyp theca, are comparable with a flattened Pseudooides embryo (compare figures 2 and 5; see also figure 6a–h). The prototheca of Hexaconularia has an aperture-parallel aboral furrow or concavity (figure 5b–d,i–k) and marginal wrinkles (figure 5d,e,j,i). These wrinkles occur in far greater number in the prototheca of Hexaconularia than in the embryo of Pseudooides; we infer this difference to be associated with the flattening of the spherical embryo of Pseudooides to the bilaterally compressed theca of Hexaconularia. The aperture has acute ends (figure 5c,j,k), reflecting the unfolding of the extreme ends of the invaginated embryonic aperture, and thus it represents the widest point of what is conventionally interpreted as the polyp theca. The wrinkled appearance of the Pseudooides embryos and the concave abapical region of the Hexaconularia thecae are identical, reflecting a thin cuticle. The two dominant, and two more subtle, bilateral pairs of ridges aligned with the ab-adapertural axis of the Hexaconularia theca (figure 5g,i) reflect the four transverse ‘metameric’ furrows of the Pseudooides ‘germ band’. Together with the ridges that define the ‘corners’ at the lateral extremes of the Hexaconularia aperture (figure 5c,j) and Pseudooides ‘germ band’, these paired ridges comprise ten [20], rather than the conventional interpretation of six [6], faces comprising the Hexaconularia theca. The aperture of the embryo actually begins with five transverse furrows, circumscribing six paired domains, including a central furrow that extends approximately half of the circumference of the embryo (figure 1). However, this long central transverse furrow is subsequently lost as the central domain of the aperture unfolds, leading to the ‘pinched’ stage (figures 2a–e and 6a). No vestige of this central transverse furrow remains in the adult theca.
The lateral axial depression in the abapical division of the Hexaconularia theca [21] (figure 5d,g,h) reflects the folding of the ectoderm associated with the transverse ‘pinch’ in the invaginated aperture of the Pseudooides embryo [4,5] (figure 2a–d,i). Later development is dominated by the extension and expansion of the theca, which appears to have occurred episodically, through the extension of the aperture, punctuated by tranverse ridges. The division of the theca into distinct abapical and apical regions has been highlighted previously, suggested to reflect embryonic and post-embryonic stages of development [21]. Our demonstration of a developmental link to Pseudooides confirms this suggestion.
In an attempt to resolve the phylogenetic affinity, and therefore the evolutionary significance of these direct-developing metazoans, we compiled a cladistic dataset of phenotypic characters, building on previous attempts [15,16] but expanded to encompass extant anthozoan and medusozoan diversity, as well as ctenophore, sponge, placozoan and bilaterian out-groups. We subjected this to Bayesian phylogenetic inference using the Mk + G model (controlling for ascertainment bias [22]) in MrBayes [23]. The majority consensus of the posterior distribution of trees is surprisingly well-resolved, given that it is based on a phenotype dataset, with good support for many clades and conforming largely with existing hypotheses of relationships for the extant taxa (figure 6i). Within this scheme, Pseudooides is resolved within a clade with the extinct olivooids and Conulariida, sister to the extant scyphozoans Nausithoe and Atolla, nested among a broader clade of scyphozoans and cubozoans (figure 6i).
4. Discussion
The discovery that Pseudooides and Hexaconularia represent distinct developmental stages of the same organism requires some remedial taxonomy; Pseudooides has priority and we recognize Hexaconularia as a junior synonym. This mirrors the synonymy of Olivooides and its junior synonym Punctatus [24], which are embryonic and post-embryonic stages of development of the same organism [25]. The previous interpretation of Pseudooides as an ecdyszoan was based largely on the interpretation of a germ band [4,5], which we reinterpret as a developing aperture. It was also originally based on co-association with fragments of an arthropod-like segmented and appendage-bearing organism or organisms [4]; we consider this association coincidental [26].
A cnidarian affinity for Hexaconularia has been justified principally through affinity to the extinct conulariids [6,21,27] that have long been compared with coronate scyphozoan cnidarians [7,28]. However, a more convincing case can be made based on similarity of development in Pseudooides and Olivooides, which also develops directly from embryo to polyp. In its case, Olivooides retains the stellate periderm of the embryo at the aboral apex of the post-embryonic theca [11,20,24,25], from which the theca expands through episodic release of periderm annulae at an aperture that is interpreted to have developed seasonally [11], akin to the operculum of the extant coronate scyphozoan Nausithoe [29]. There is evidence that this mode of direct development is manifest also in other hexangulaconulariids, in particular Arthrochites whose theca exhibits a morphologically distinct apex [6], presumably betraying retention of periderm from an embryonic stage of development [21]. A similar structure, the schott [30], occurs in at least some extinct conulariids. Van Iten et al. [21] have argued that its genesis is distinct, as a repair response to broken holdfasts.
Regardless, the conulariid schott suggests an equivalent mode of life to hexanguloconulariids and olivooids, as a sediment- or mat-sticker, rather than fused to the substrate [24]. This ecological strategy may be a consequence of the direct mode of development adopted by these scyphozoans. However, it may also reflect the stable nature of the mat-bound substrates that obtained in shallow marine environments in the early Cambrian period [31]. Thus, though direct development from embryo to polyp is uncommon among extant [32] cnidarians, this may be a consequence of the Cambrian substrate revolution. Further, the peculiar preservation of embryonic and post-embryonic developmental stages may also reflect their predisposition to fossilization through the precocial development of cuticular periderm within the embryo.
The results of our phylogenetic analysis suggest that Pseudooides is a member of a broader clade of direct-developing scyphozoan cnidarians, with a life history that is quite distinct from their living relatives. It is also a clade that exhibits an extraordinary level of body-plan symmetry, encompassing tetraradial, pentaradial and pseudo-hexa-radial forms. Together, these factors suggest that the life history modes and organizational symmetry of extant medusozoans are a relict of a broader diversity apparent early in their evolutionary history. The early Cambrian Fortunian age of these fossils combined with their total-group Coronata affinity provides intrinsic evidence for an extensive pre-Phanerozoic history to the cnidarian and eumetazoan crown and total groups, compatible with claims of Ediacaran fossil cnidarians [33] and molecular clock estimates for the origin of these clades [34].
5. Systematic palaeontology
Phylum CNIDARIA Hatschek, 1888
Class SCYPHOZOA Götte, 1887
Order ?CONULARIIDA Miller and Gurley, 1896
Family HEXANGULACONULARIIDAE He, 1987
Genus Pseudooides Qian, 1977
Pseudooides Qian [2], p. 217
Hexaconularia (nomen nudum) Yang, He and Deng [35], p. 95
Hexaconularia He and Yang [36], p. 35
Type species. Pseudooides prima Qian [2]
Emended diagnosis. Organism composed of two distinct sections; the lenticular apex of embryonic tissue and the tapered, highly compressed abapical region of post-embryonic tissue. The apical region is relatively smooth with closely spaced ridges, while the abapical tissue is coarse with regular transverse ridges. The embryo is an approximately 0.3 mm sphere in which a longitudinal aperture develops, the margins of which are folded, giving the appearance of six paired and bilaterally arranged domains that prefigure the arrangement of the architecture of the adult, and taper to a point at both ends.
Description. The genus forms highly compressed (transv.) and tapered skeleton or theca with a lenticular apex of embryonic tissue and much larger abapical post-embryonic tissue with the transverse cross section elongate with ten sides arranged tetraradially. The embryonic tissue is with two gently convex faces and a gently curved broad tip with a terminal furrow; faces of the embryonic tissue crossed by fine, closely spaced, relatively irregular transverse ridges. The post-embryonic tissue is with an open aperture and 10 faces exhibiting characteristic transverse ridges.
Remarks. A post-embryonic stage of the organism, in which the aperture of the embryo is fully open, but post-embryonic thecal tissues have not yet developed, has yet to be recovered. However, such absence is remedied by the homologous structures observed at embryonic and post-embryonic developmental stages, such as the terminal furrow and surface ridges on the apical tissue, as well as the ten faces (metameres of the embryonic stage) and the transverse ridges on the abapical tissue. The embryonic stage of the organism is distinctive from other fossil embryos for its relatively smaller size (approx. 300 µm) and typical ‘8’-shaped wrinkles on the abapical tissue.
Pseudooides prima Qian [2]
Pseudooides prima Qian [2], p. 217 pl. 2, fig. 26.
Hexaconularia multicostata (nomen nudum) Yang, He and Deng [35], p. 95, pl. 3, figs 6, 12; He [37], p. 10, 12.
Hexaconularia nanjiangensis (nomen nudum) Yang, He and Deng [35], pp. 94–95, pl. 3, fig. 8; He [37], p. 12.
Hexaconularia sichuanensis (nomen nudum) Yang, He and Deng [35], p. 94, pl. 3, fig. 10a,b; He [37], p. 12.
Hexaconularia xinliensis (nomen nudum) Yang, He and Deng [35], p. 95, pl. 3, fig. 11a,b; He [37], p. 9, 10, 12.
Hexaconularia sp. (nomen nudum) Yang, He and Deng [35], pl. 3, fig. 7.
Hexaconularia sichuanensis He and Yang [36], pp. 35–36, pl. 4, figs 5, 6.
Hexaconularia nanjiangensis He and Yang [36], p. 36, pl. 4, fig. 2.
Hexaconularia breviculus He and Yang [36], p. 36, pl. 4, figs 7–9.
Hexaconularia xinliensis compressiformis He and Yang [36], p. 37, pl. 5, fig. 1.
Hexaconularia xinliensis crassiformis He and Yang [36], p. 37, pl. 5, figs 3, 4.
Hexaconularia bellulus He and Yang [36], p. 37, pl. 5, figs 8–10.
Hexaconularia bellulus compressiformis He and Yang [36], p. 38, pl. 5, fig. 2.
Hexaconularia longelus He and Yang [36], p. 38, pl. 5, figs 11, 12.
Hexaconularia multicostata He and Yang [36], pl. 5, figs 5–7.
Barbitositheca ansata Brasier and Singh [38], p. 335, 337, figs 7.1–7.3.
?Conulariella quadrata (nomen nudum) He [37], p. 9, 11, 13.
Hexangulaconularia cf. formosa Brasier and Singh [38], p. 337, figs 7.4–7.6.
Hexangulaconularia formosa Qian, 1989, pp. 161–162, pl. 28, figs 7–9; text-fig. 32.
Hexangulaconularia xinliensis (Yang et al.); Qian [3], pp. 162–163, pl. 10, figs 12, 13; pl. 28, fig. 6.
Pseudooides prima Qian [2]; Qian [3], p. 262, pl. 71, fig. 6.
Hexaconularia sichuanensis He and Yang [36]; Conway Morris and Chen [6], pp. 400–401, figs 12.8–12.14. (cum. syn.).
Embryo type B; Steiner et al. [8], p. 266, fig. 4.4.
Hexaconularia sichuanensis He and Yang [36]; Steiner et al. [8], p. 270, figs 8.1–8.2.
Pseudooides prima Qian [2]; Steiner et al. [4], p. 834, fig. 2I–O (partim, cf. figs A-H; non figs 2P-S).
Pseudooides Qian [2]; Donoghue and Dong [26], p. 89, fig. 3c–e.
Pseudooides prima Qian [2]; Donoghue et al. [5], p. 682, fig. 3.
Hexaconularia sichuanensis He and Yang [36]; Van Iten et al. [21], pp. 192–196, figs 1, 2.
Hexaconularia sichuanensis He and Yang [36]; Steiner et al. [20], p. 104, figs 7.13–7.16, 7.19–7.21.
Pseudooides prima Qian [2]; Donoghue et al. [1], p. 54, fig. 3.5a–c.
Hexaconularia sichuanensis He and Yang [36]; Zhang et al. [39], p. 3, fig. 2.9.s.
Diagnosis. As for the genus.
Description. In the pre-hatching embryonic stage, the apical tissue occupies the major part of the embryo; the surface of the apical tissue is mostly smooth, with fine, closely spaced ridges along the boundary with the abapical tissue; the aboral pole of the embryo is characterized by a transverse terminal furrow. The abapical tissue has a highly wrinkled surface appearance usually with a central pinch—a vestige of the expansion of the centre of the aperture in late embryonic development; 10 apertural domains, separated by the intermediate furrows (not including the pinched centre), are homologous to 10 faces of the post-embryonic tissue; the median furrow represents the aperture of the organism.
After hatching, the apical tissue is flattened, forming a lenticular shape and, with the expansion of the theca at the aperture, occupying an increasingly subordinate part of the organism; the surface ornamentation deforms with the compression of the embryo, but remains mostly unchanged. The abapical tissue is unfolded and stretches after hatching. Specifically, in the embryonic stage, furrows at tapering ends of the aperture evaginate, forming the tapered transitional region of the post-embryonic stage between the abapical and apical tissues; the abapical tissue gives rise to the tapered abapical post-embryonic tissue with ten faces and an aperture, exhibiting regular trochoidal transverse ridges.
Remarks. The image of the holotype shows the typical 8-shaped structure of the embryonic developing aperture of the species, yet provides little insight into post-embryonic development. Most of the existing taxonomy has been based on the adult specimens, with regard to the morphological differences of the apical or abapical regions, such as the angle and the number of ridges of the apicial region, the angle of the abapical region, and the shape and aspect ratio of the transverse section of the abapical region. In the light of the developmental insights afforded by our data, we consider these differences to be more likely to represent individual or preservation differences, rather than distinguishing characteristics of distinct taxa.
6. Conclusion
The early Cambrian Pseudooides prima has been described as among the earliest records of ecdysozoans, based on embryonic and post-embryonic stages of development. Based on new collections, we characterize the embryonic stages tomographically, using synchrotron radiation X-ray computed tomography. We show that the ‘germ band’ of P. prima embryos separates along its mid axis during development, with the transverse furrows between the ‘somites’ unfolding into the polar aperture of the ten-sided theca of Hexaconularia sichuanensis, conventionally interpreted as a scyphozoan cnidarian. Co-occurring post-embryonic remains of ecdysozoans are unrelated. Direct development in P. prima parallels the co-occuring olivooids Arthrochites, Olivooides and Quadrapyrgites, and Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of a novel phenotype dataset indicates that, despite differences in their symmetry, the hexangulaconulariids and olivooids comprise a clade of scyphozoan medusozoans, with Arthrochites and conulariids, most of which exhibit direct development from embryo to thecate polyp. Like some conulariids, these coronates lived embedded within, rather than fused to, sedimentary substrates, presumably a consequence of their unique mode of direct development. The affinity of hexangulaconulariids to extant scyphozoan medusozoans indicates that the prevalence of tetraradial symmetry and indirect development is a vestige of a broader spectrum of body-plan symmetries and developmental modes that was manifest in their early Phanerozoic counterparts.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Dong, Donoghue and Bengtson Labs for their assistance at the TOMCAT beam line of the Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland and for providing us with all the scanning data.
Data accessibility
The supporting tomographic and phylogenetic datasets are available from the University of Bristol data repository (data.bris) at https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.3vd8kczvuzo3y2nrn6n8m6l2y4 and Figshare, respectively.
Authors' contributions
X.-P.D. and P.C.J.D. conceived this research. B.D., X.-P.D. and P.C.J.D. undertook the fieldwork. B.D. and X.-P.D. did the wet laboratory work. J.C., B.D., P.C.J.D., X.-P.D. and K.V. undertook the SRXTM measurements. B.D. and K.V. analysed the SRXTM data. L.P. undertook the phylogenetic analyses. B.D., X.-P.D. and P.C.J.D. drafted the manuscript, to which all the authors contributed.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 41372015 to X.-P.D.; 41406057 to B.D.), State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant 103102 to X.-P.D.), Research Fund for Doctoral Program of High Education (grant 20060001059 to X.-P.D.), Natural Environment Research Council (NE/F00348X/1; NE/P013678/1 to P.C.J.D.) and a Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award (to P.C.J.D.).
References
- 1.Donoghue PCJ, Cunningham JA, Dong X-P, Bengtson S. 2015. Embryology in deep time. Volume 1: introduction, non-bilateria, Acoelomorpha, Xenoturbellida, Chaetognatha. In Evolutionary developmental biology of invertebrates (ed. Wanninger A.), pp. 45–63. Vienna, Austria: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Qian Y. 1977. Hyolitha and some problematica from the Lower Cambrian Meischucunian stage in central and southwestern China. Acta Palaeontol. Sinica 16, 255–275. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Qian Y. 1989. Early Cambrian small shelly fossils of China with special reference to the precambrian-Cambrian boundary. Nanjing, People's Republic of China: Nanjing University Publishing House. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Steiner M, Zhu M, Li G, Qian Y, Erdtmann B-D. 2004. New early Cambrian bilaterian embryos and larvae from China. Geology 32, 833–836. ( 10.1130/G20567.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Donoghue PCJ, et al. 2006. Synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy of fossil embryos. Nature 442, 680–683. ( 10.1038/nature04890) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Conway MS, Chen M. 1992. Carinachitids, Hexangulaconulariids, and Punctatus: problematic metazoans from the Early Cambrian of South China. Journal of Paleontology 66, 384–406. ( 10.1017/S0022336000033953) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Van Iten H, Marques AC, Leme JDM, Pacheco ML, Simões MG, Smith A. 2014. Origin and early diversification of the phylum Cnidaria Verrill: major developments in the analysis of the taxon's Proterozoic-Cambrian history. Palaeontology 57, 677–690. ( 10.1111/pala.12116) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Steiner M, Li G, Zhu M. 2004. Lower Cambrian small shelly fossils of northern Sichuan and southern Shaanxi (China), and their biostratigraphic significance. Geobios 37, 259–275. ( 10.1016/j.geobios.2003.08.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Peng S, Babcock LE, Cooper RA. 2012. The Cambrian period. In The geological time scale 2012 (eds Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Schmitz M, Ogg G), pp. 437–488. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Müller KJ. 1985. Exceptional preservation in calcareous nodules. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 311, 67–73. ( 10.1098/rstb.1985.0139) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dong X-P, Vargas K, Cunningham JA, Zhang H, Liu T, Chen F, Liu J, Bengtson S, Donoghue PCJ. 2016. Developmental biology of the early Cambrian cnidarian Olivooides. Palaeontology 59, 387–407. ( 10.1111/pala.12231) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nielsen C, Scharff N, Eibye-Jacobsen D. 1996. Cladistic analysis of the animal kingdom. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 57, 385–410. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01857.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ax P. 1996. Multicellular animals: a new approach to the phylogenetic order in nature, vol. I, p. 225 Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ou Q, Xiao S, Han J, Sun G, Zhang F, Zhang Z, Shu D. 2015. A vanished history of skeletonization in Cambrian comb jellies. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500092 ( 10.1126/sciadv.1500092) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Marques AC, Collins AG. 2004. Cladistic analysis of Medusozoa and cnidarian evolution. Invertebr. Biol. 123, 23–42. ( 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2004.tb00139.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.van Iten H, Leme JDM, Simòes MG, Marques AC, Collins AG. 2006. Reassessment of the phylogenetic position of conulariids (?Ediacaran–Triassic) within the subphylum Medusozoa (Phylum Cnidaria). J. Syst. Paleontol. 4, 109–118. ( 10.1017/S1477201905001793) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Won J, Rho B, Song J. 2001. A phylogenetic study of the Anthozoa (phylum Cnidaria) based on morphological and molecular characters. Coral Reefs 20, 39–50. ( 10.1007/s003380000132) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Daly M, Fautin DG, Cappola VA. 2003. Systematics of the Hexacorallia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 139, 419–437. ( 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2003.00084.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mendoza-Becerril MA, Maronna MM, Pacheco ML, Simões MG, Leme JM, Miranda LS, Morandini AC, Marques AC. 2016. An evolutionary comparative analysis of the medusozoan (Cnidaria) exoskeleton. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 178, 206–225. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Steiner M, Qian Y, Li G, Hagadorn JW, Zhu M. 2014. The developmental cycles of early Cambrian Olivooidae fam. nov. (?Cycloneuralia) from the Yangtze Platform (China). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 398, 97–124. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.08.016) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van Iten H, Maoyan Z, Li GX. 2010. Redescription of Hexaconularia He and Yang, 1986 (Lower Cambrian, South China): implications for the affinities of conulariid-like small shelly fossils. Palaeontology 53, 191–199. ( 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2009.00925.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lewis PO. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50, 913–925. ( 10.1080/106351501753462876) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ronquist F, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542. ( 10.1093/sysbio/sys029) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yue Z, Bengtson S. 1999. Embryonic and post-embryonic development of the Early Cambrian cnidarian Olivooides. Lethaia 32, 181–195. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bengtson S, Yue Z. 1997. Fossilized metazoan embryos from the earliest Cambrian. Science 277, 1645–1648. ( 10.1126/science.277.5332.1645) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Donoghue PCJ, Dong X-P. 2005. Embryos and ancestors. In Evolving form and function: fossils and development (ed. Briggs DEG.), pp. 81–99. New Haven, CT: Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qian Y, Bengtson S. 1989. Palaeontology and biostratigraphy of the Early Cambrian Meishucunian Stage in Yunnan Province, South China. Fossils & Strata 24, 1–156. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Werner B. 1966. Stephanoscyphus (Scyphozoa, Coronatae) und seine direkte Abstammung von den fossilen Conulata. Helgoland Marine Research 13, 317–347. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Werner B, Hentschel J. 1983. Apogamous life-cycle of Stephanoscyphus planulophorus. Mar. Biol. 74, 301–304. ( 10.1007/BF00403455) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.van Iten H. 1991. Anatomy, patterns of occurrence, and nature of the conulariid schott. Palaeontology 34, 939–954. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Buatois LA, Narbonne GM, Mangano MG, Carmona NB, Myrow P. 2014. Ediacaran matground ecology persisted into the earliest Cambrian. Nat. Commun. 5, 3544 ( 10.1038/ncomms4544) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dong XP, Cunningham JA, Bengtson S, Thomas CW, Liu J, Stampanoni M, Donoghue PCJ. 2013. Embryos, polyps and medusae of the Early Cambrian scyphozoan Olivooides. Proc. R. Soc. B. 280, 20130071 ( 10.1098/rspb.2013.0071) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cunningham JA, Liu AG, Bengtson S, Donoghue PC.J. 2017. The origin of animals: can molecular clocks and the fossil record be reconciled? Bioessays 39, e201600120 ( 10.1002/bies.201600120) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.dos Reis M, Thawornwattana Y, Angelis K, Telford Maximilian J, Donoghue Philip CJ, Yang Z. 2015. Uncertainty in the timing of origin of animals and the limits of precision in molecular timescales. Curr. Biol. 25, 2939–2950. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.066) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yang X, He Y, Deng S. 1983. On the Sinian-Cambrian boundary and the small shelly fossil assemblages in Nanjiang area, Sichuan. Bull. Chengdu Inst. Geol. Miner. Res. 1983–4, 91–110. [Google Scholar]
- 36.He Y, Yang X. 1986. Early Cambrian coelenterates from Nanjiang, Sichuan. Bull. Chengdu Inst. Geol. Min. Res. 7, 31–43. [Google Scholar]
- 37.He T. 1987. Early Cambrian conulariids from Yangtze platform and their early evolution. J. Chengdu College Geol. 14, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brasier MD, Singh P. 1987. Microfossils and Precambrian–Cambrian boundary stratigraphy at Maldeota, Lesser Himalaya. Geol. Mag. 124, 323 ( 10.1017/S0016756800016666) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang H, Maas A, Waloszek D. In press. New material of scalidophoran worms in Orsten-type preservation from the Cambrian Fortunian Stage of South China. J. Paleontol. ( 10.1017/jpa.2017.39) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The supporting tomographic and phylogenetic datasets are available from the University of Bristol data repository (data.bris) at https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.3vd8kczvuzo3y2nrn6n8m6l2y4 and Figshare, respectively.