Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2006 Mar 13;27(20):3745–3757. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.028

Effect of surface-adsorbed proteins and phosphorylation inhibitor AG18 on intracellular protein expression in adherent macrophages

Sean T Zuckerman a,b, Weiyuan John Kao a,b,*
PMCID: PMC5746427  NIHMSID: NIHMS928815  PMID: 16530822

Abstract

Macrophages are believed to play an important role in the host inflammatory response to implanted biomaterials. However, the mechanism of macrophage adhesion to protein-adsorbed substrates and the subsequent activation and inflammation is unresolved. Previously the effect of various surface-adsorbed proteins and increasing concentrations of phosphorylation inhibitor AG18 on intracellular protein expression levels in adherent human monocytic cell line U937 was identified using SDS-PAGE and densitometry. The protein ligands and AG18 concentrations up or down regulated the expression of a set of proteins ranging from ~200 to ~23 kDa. In the present work, HPLC coupled tandem mass spectroscopy (LC/MS) was used to identify proteins in these bands. We hypothesized that key proteins in macrophage adhesion and activation could be identified by observing protein expression resulting from various surface-adsorbed ligands and AG18 concentrations. Increasing concentrations of AG18 down or up regulate protein expression in adherent U937 on PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~52, ~42 and ~23 kDa. AG18 concentrations had no effect surfaces on cells on albumin (Alb)-adsorbed but regulated different protein expression in adherent U937 on fibronectin (FN)-adsorbed TCPS at 40 and 80 μM AG18. Both Alb and FN regulate distinct sets of proteins in adherent cells as surface-adsorbed ligands. Based on the data from LC/MS, both surface associated ligand and increasing concentrations of AG18 modulate shifts in intracellular signaling.

Keywords: LC/MS, U937, Proteomics, Tyrosine phosphorylation, Inflammation, Fibronectin

1. Introduction

Macrophages can interact with extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins adsorbed on the biomaterial surface and adhere via integrin receptors expressed at the cell surface [14]. Subsequently cells may alter gene expression via intracellular signaling cascades driven by tyrosine residue phosphorylation allowing the macrophages to respond to extracellular signals [57]. However, the molecular mechanism underlying ECM–integrin ligation remains unresolved. Numerous ECM proteins contain the amino acid sequence arginine–glycine–aspartic acid (RGD) known to trigger cell adhesion [8,9]. We have previously employed the human monocytic cell line U937 to probe the response of macrophages to surface-adsorbed peptide or protein ligands and increasing concentrations of the phosphorylation inhibitor tyrphostin 23 (AG18). After adhering to ligand-adsorbed TCPS for 12 or 24 h, U937 were trypsinized, lysed, immunoprecipitated for tyrosine phosphorylated proteins and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Densitometry was performed on the gels after staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue dye to identify bands showing up or down regulated protein expression. Various surface associated ligands and AG18 concentrations affected the expression levels of a set of proteins ranging from ~200 to ~23 kDa [10] (Table 1). Western blotting and mass spectrometry are two methods for protein identification in proteomics study [11,12]. Since several proteins in an immunoprecipitated cell lysate may possess a similar molecular weight range, Western blotting can identify a specific protein [12,13], but for complex mixtures such as cell lysates, Western blots are inefficient in identifying a large number of proteins.

Table 1.

Differential expression of various intracellular proteins in adherent U937 on protein-modified TCPS treated with or without AG18 as assayed by previous study [10]

MW (kDa) Ligand-adsorbed surface [AG18] (μM) Trenda,b Ligand-adsorbed control surface [AG18] (μM)
~160 Albumin 40 > Albumin   0
Fibronectin 40 > Fibronectin   0
~130 Fibronectin 20 < Fibronectin   0
~100 Fibronectin 20 < Fibronectin   0
~65 Phosphate buffer 40 < Phosphate buffer   0
~52 Albumin 40 < Albumin   0
Fibronectin 20 < Phosphate buffer 20
~42 Phosphate buffer 40 < Phosphate buffer   0
Phosphate buffer 60 < Phosphate buffer   0
Albumin   0 < Phosphate buffer   0
Fibronectin 20 < Phosphate buffer 20
~23 Phosphate buffer 60 > Phosphate buffer   0
Phosphate buffer 80 > Phosphate buffer   0
Albumin 40 > Albumin   0
Albumin 80 > Albumin   0
Fibronectin 40 > Phosphate buffer 40
Fibronectin 80 > Fibronectin   0
a

> is up regulated.

b

< is down regulated.

A more comprehensive proteomics tool is mass spectroscopy [1417]. The basis of mass spectrometry is detecting charged ions in the gas phase thus allowing calculation of the overall molecular weight. The two main variations of mass spec applied to proteomics are matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) and electrospray ionization (ESI). Both techniques are considered “soft” ionizations that minimize protein or peptide degradation. MALDI uses an organic matrix that absorbs energy from a laser to vaporize the peptide. MALDI does not reveal amino acid sequence directly but does allow rapid and sensitive peptide mass detection. MALDI is limited to relatively simple protein mixtures. Peptide sequence data can be obtained from a variation of MALDI using magnets to trap ions for dissociation and further detection. This variation is called Fourier transform mass spec (FT-MS). While MALDI utilizes a laser for peptide ionization, ESI relies on fluid sprayed from a fine needle to form tiny droplets that evaporate to form charged particles in the gaseous phase. ESI instruments are typically coupled to HPLC (LC/MS) allowing for resolution of complex peptide mixtures before ionization. Often an ion trap is included on the ESI to capture specific peptide ions and induce dissociation based on collision with an inert gas. This dissociation enables compilation of detailed sequence data. The determination of ion mass/charge in ESI is typically less sensitive than MALDI. There are two kinds of ESI used for proteomics: microspray and nanospray indicating the level of sensitivity (i.e. micrograms for microspray and nanograms for nanospray). In the present study, intracellular proteins from adherent U937 were identified using nanospray LC/MS. We hypothesized LC/MS could effectively survey and identify intracellular signaling proteins modulated by surface-adsorbed proteins and AG18 concentration.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Cell line and reagents

Human monocytic cell line CRL-1593.2/U-937 (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)) [18] were used. Reagents were obtained from the following sources: glacial acetic acid (Aldrich); 10-well Ready Gel® (Tris–HCl, 10% resolving®, 4% stacking®), Coomassie Brilliant Blue (G-250), 10× Tris/Glycine/SDS buffer (BioRad); Clonetics reagent pack (trypsin/EDTA, trypsin neutralizing solution, HEPES-buffered saline solution) (Cambrex); immobilized phospho-tyrosine monoclonal antibody (mAb) P-Tyr-100 (#9419) (Cell Signaling); 1× phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS), Rosswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 media (CellGro); human plasma purified fibronectin (FN) (Chemicon); isopropyl alcohol (EM Sciences); HPLC grade acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (Fisher); fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone); ZipTip® (C18, P10 size) (Millipore); bicinchonic acid (BCA) protein quantification kit and standards, M-PER® mammalian protein extraction reagent, Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, PepClean C-18 spin columns (Pierce); trypsin (modified sequence grade) (Promega); sodium orthovanadate, ammonium bicarbonate ((NH4)HCO3), dithiothreitol (DTT), iodoacetamide (IAA), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), formic acid (FA), human purified serum albumin, tyrphostin 23 (AG18), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma).

2.2. Preparation of cell lysates and immunoprecipitation

About 1 μM solutions of albumin (Alb) or FN were adsorbed to 75 cm2 TCPS flasks for 24 h at 37°C. Surfaces were washed once with 1 × PBS. About 1.7×105 cells/cm2 U937 cells were seeded with RPMI 1640, 5% FBS, 50 ng/mL PMA and 0, 20, 40, 60 or 80 μM AG18 and were incubated for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2 and ~95% humidity. Adherent cells were trypsinized, lysed with M-PER® containing 1×HALT protease inhibitor and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate to inhibit phosphatase activity. BCA was performed on the raw cell lysates to determine protein concentration. Antiphosphotyrosine mAb P-Tyr-100 was used to immunoprecipitate 550 μg of raw cell lysate at 4°C overnight. M-PER® was used to wash the IP beads twice before denaturing the proteins for 10 min at room temperature in 3×loading buffer containing 50 mM DTT. The IP beads and proteins were incubated at ~90°C for 10 min before SDS-PAGE on Tris–HCl gels (10% resolving, 4% stacking). The gels were run at 84 V for 30 min during the stacking gel and 129 V for 1 h 45 min through the resolving gel [10]. Under the present analysis scheme, one sample for protein analysis requires more than 25 million cells. Analyzing the 47 conditions presented in this work in duplicate (i.e. n=2) with primary monocytes would thus require a prohibitively large number of donors and introduce inherent donor variations. The data obtained from working with U937 will help us construct a framework for understanding primary cell behavior.

2.3. LC/MS

Aseptic techniques performed in a laminar flow hood were used for all LC/MS sample preparation. A total of 47 combinations of AG18 concentrations and surface-adsorbed proteins were analyzed in duplicate (n = 2). LC/MS sample preparation was performed according to a protocol established by the Biotechnology Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison. After SDS-PAGE residual SDS was removed by washing three times in Milli-Q water for 10 min. Gels were stained with ~5 mL of Coomassie Brilliant blue for 1 h at room temperature. The gels were destained for 1 h with 20 mL of Milli-Q water. The bands of interest (Table 1) were excised from the gel using an X-acto® knife and placed into siliconized 0.65 mL Eppendorf tubes. Gel fragments were destained for 10 min with 100 mM (NH4)HCO3/50% methanol with intermittent vortexing until all the dye was removed, dehydrated twice for 10 min in 25 mM (NH4)HCO3/50% ACN and dried in a vacuum centrifuge for 10 min. About 25 mM DTT was used to rehydrate the bands and reduce the proteins for 30 min at 56°C. The gel fragments were then allowed to cool to room temperature, any residual liquid was pipetted off and reduced cysteine residues were alkylated for 30 min in the dark with fresh 55 mM IAA. Residual liquid was pipetted off and the fragments equilibrated in Milli-Q water for 15 min followed by equilibration in 25 mM (NH4)HCO3 for 10 min with intermittent vortexing. Gel fragments were dehydrated twice with 25 mM (NH4)HCO3/50%ACN for 10 min and dried on the vacuum centrifuge for 10 min. The bands were then rehydrated with 20 ng/mL trypsin in 25 mM (NH4)HCO3 for 15 min at 4°C. A minimal amount of 25 mM (NH4)HCO3 was placed on top of the bands to ensure full immersion throughout the 16–20 h incubation at 37°C. After digestion the solutions were placed into clean 0.65 mL siliconized Eppendorf tubes. Any peptides remaining in the gel were extracted using 0.1% TFA in Milli-Q water for 20 min with constant vortexing and combined with the overnight digestion solution. Peptides were extracted two additional times for 20 min each with 5% TFA/70% ACN and constant vortexing (high setting). Peptides were obtained from the peptide solution by drying in a vacuum centrifuge for ~1.5 h. The peptides were desalted using C18 ZipTips® or PepClean C-18 spin columns according to manufacturer’s protocol replacing TFA with FA to prevent ion pairing during ionization. Peptides were stored at −80°C until LC/MS analysis.

Peptides were separated by an 1100 HPLC system with nano-pump flow capability coupled to an Agilent MSD ion trap mass spectrometer. Samples were initially separated on a Zorbax C-18sb trap column at 0.280 μL/min for 15 min. The trap column eluted to a 75 μm×150 mm analytical column in a 120 min gradient from 0.1% FA/10% ACN/water to 0.1% FA/60% ACN/water. Over the course of 10 min, the ACN was ramped to 95%. Afterwards the column was re-equilibrated with 10% ACN for 20 min. Peptides eluted from the analytical column directly into the ion trap via an 8 μm glass spray needle (New Objective). The ion trap was configured to prefer doubly charged ions and trigger MS/MS at 0.1% of the absolute maximum intensity as a threshold value. The actual threshold was 100,000 counts. The ion trap captured 75,000 ions per trap cycle and was set for a maximum accumulation time of 100 ms per cycle. Any peptide fragments in each cycle were resolved using Agilent proprietary software for the ion trap. Mass spectrometer data was converted to .mgf files using the Agilent ion trap software and searched against the human portion of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database using Mascot. Hits with a Mowse score >40 were collected [19]. The significance of the peptide hits were assessed by this Mascot score.

Before further analysis the raw data from the LC/MS experiments had to be refined for relevance and significance. Novel proteins, unnamed proteins or protein hits from species other than Homo sapiens were not considered relevant. Proteins identified from different peptide hits were condensed into one entry noting both the maximum and minimum ion scores. Table 2 illustrates this analysis scheme for PMA proteins with all of those proteins that satisfy the filtering criteria highlighted in bold. Since the goal of the present work is to identify proteins expressed in adherent U937 cells, any proteins identified from PMA cells were removed from data obtained from cells adherent to ligand-adsorbed TCPS. Table 3 illustrates the data refining methodology for U937 on Alb-adsorbed TCPS. The Human Protein Reference Database (www.hprd.org) and Expert Protein Analysis System (Expasy) were searched for the remaining proteins. Relevant data such as protein function, protein–protein interactions and if the protein is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues was recorded if available. If the protein name from Mascot could not be located in either database, the locus identification tag for the peptide was found using the NCBI accession number. The corresponding protein was then found in Expasy using the locus ID tag. The protein name from Expasy was used to locate the protein in the HPRD. Comparisons based on previous densitometry, surface-adsorbed ligand and AG18 concentration were made after protein identification.

Table 2.

Raw LC/MS data for U937 cells in suspsension (PMA)a

Protein MW Peptide sequence identified Mascot score Protein ID
264,161 AVSLKALPDFSNVEIK 45 Predicted: similar to myocyte nuclear factor
13,444 MIAPILDEIADEYQGK 69 Chain B, Ige Fv Spe7 complexed with a recombinant thioredoxin
26,759 VLEGNEQFINAAK 67 Unnamed protein product
67,751 TSRPENAIIYNNNEDFQVGQAK 62 Transketolase
67,751 SVPTSTVFYPSDGVATEK 46 Transketolase
46,957 AAVPSGASTGIYEALELR 66 Muscle specific enolase
95,277 ARPFPDGLAEDIDKGEVSAR 56 Human elongation factor 2
187,771 LLYNNVSNFGR 46 CLTC protein
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 125 Unnamed protein product
59,492 ELTTEIDNNIEQISSYK 94 Unnamed protein product
59,492 ALEESNYELEGK 85 Unnamed protein product
59,492 LENEIQTYR 71 Unnamed protein product
59,492 VLDELTLTK 65 Unnamed protein product
59,492 QSLEASLAETEGR 58 Unnamed protein product
49,640 LAVNMVPFPR 55 Tubulin, beta polypeptide
76,104 MFCYDPSHNMWLKCVSLK 48 Unnamed protein product
59,772 ILGADTSVDLEETGR 95 ATP synthase alpha
64,542 TILPAAAQDVYYR 50 Similar to ribophorin I
84,621 GVVDSEDLPLNISR 72 Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha (HSP 86)
84,621 ADLINNLGTIAK 45 Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha (HSP 86)
101,495 YVVVTGITPTPLGEGK 51 C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, cytoplasmic (C1THF synthase)
a

Proteins in bold are relevant hits used for data comparison with those from adherent cells.

Table 3.

Raw LC/MS data for adherent U937 cells on Alb-adsorbed TCPSa

Protein MW Peptide sequence identified Mascot score Protein ID
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 71 Unnamed protein product
59,492 ELTTEIDNNIEQISSYK 66 Unnamed protein product
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 97 Unnamed protein product
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 101 Unnamed protein product
59,492 SLLEGEGSSGGGGR 72 Unnamed protein product
59,492 SQYEQLAEQNR 77 Unnamed protein product
59,492 ALEESNYELEGK 75 Unnamed protein product
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 103 Unnamed protein product
39,195 NLDLDSIIAEVK 56 Unnamed protein product
39,195 ADTLTDEINFLR 64 Unnamed protein product
2,991,589 LEPPELILDANMAR 41 Titinb
59,772 ILGADTSVDLEETGR 87 ATP synthase alphac
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 135 Unnamed protein product
49,599 LAVNMVPFPR 48 Tubulin 5-beta
49,599 IMNTFSVVPSPK 56 Tubulin 5-beta
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 119 Unnamed protein product
59,492 ELTTEIDNNIEQISSYK 62 Unnamed protein product
39,195 NLDLDSIIAEVK 59 Unnamed protein product
46,597 GSYPDAILQAQAADK 88 Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 precursor
46,597 IPNLLPEGSVDGDTR 42 Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 precursor
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 121 Unnamed protein product
59,492 NVSTGDVNVEMNAAPGVDLTQLLNNMR 45 Unnamed protein product
41,786 SYELPDGQVITIGNER 56 Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin)
59,492 GSLGGGFSSGGFSGGSFSR 81 Unnamed protein product
a

Proteins in bold are those identified after data analysis.

b

Tyrosine phosphorylated.

c

Also found in PMA cells.

3. Results/discussion

3.1. Comparison of nanospray LC/MS results based on previous densitometry findings

Mass spectrometry coupled to HPLC was used to identify intracellular proteins expressed by adherent U937 macrophages in response to various culture conditions. These protein identities may provide insight into the previously observed densitometric trends shown in Table 1 [10].

U937 cells on Alb- or FN-adsorbed TCPS with 40 μM AG18 showed an increased ~160 kDa protein expression compared to cells cultured without AG18 on the respective surfaces (Table 1). However, no proteins were identified at ~160 kDa from cells on Alb- or FN-adsorbed TCPS with 0 or 40 μM AG18. Cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS with 20 μM AG18 showed decreased ~130 kDa protein expression versus those without AG18. Antigen MLAA-44, alpha actinin 4 and unconventional myosin 1G valine form were found in cells with 20 μM AG18 while no relevant hits were found from cells cultured on FN-adsorbed TCPS without AG18. Table 1 shows that ~100 kDa protein expression in cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS with 20 μM AG18 decreased compared against those without AG18. DNA topoisomerase II beta and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit were identified in cells without AG18; no significant hits were found in cells with 20 μM AG18 on FN-adsorbed TCPS at ~100 kDa. Cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 40 μM AG18 showed decreased ~65/70 kDa protein expression against those without AG18 (Table 1). There were no significant hits identified from cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 40 μM AG18. Six proteins were identified from cells cultured without AG18 (Table 4).

Table 4.

Comparison of ~65/70 kDa proteins from adherent U937 on PBS treated TCPS with 0 or 40 μM AG18

[AG18] (μM) Protein Molecular wt. (Da)
0 ATP-dependent DNA helicase II, 70 kDa subunit 69,799
DNA helicase Q1 73,366
Heat shock-related 70 kDa protein 2 (heat shock protein) 69,952
Lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (L-plastin polypeptide) 63,839
ATP synthase beta (chain) (ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, beta polypeptide) 54,460
40 N/Da
a

None detected.

Cells on Alb-adsorbed TCPS with 40 μM AG18 showed decreased ~52 kDa expression compared to those without AG18 (Table 1). There were no proteins identified in cells treated with 40 μM AG18. Tubulin beta-4 chain and titin, which can be tyrosine phosphorylated, were identified in cells without AG18 on Alb-adsorbed TCPS. U937 on FN-adsorbed TCPS showed decreased ~52 kDa protein expression when compared to cells on PBS with 20 μM AG18. Nine proteins were found in cells on the FN-adsorbed TCPS with 20 μM AG18 samples (Table 5). No proteins were identified from cells on the PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 20 μM AG18.

Table 5.

Comparison of ~52 kDa protein band from adherent U937 on FN treated TCPS compared to PBS treated TCPS with 20 μM AG18

Surface ligand Protein Molecular wt. (Da)
PBS N/Da
FN Myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen 45,807
Anti-colorectal carcinoma heavy chain 50,570
Vimentin 53,653
Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor subunit 1 (TB3-1) 47,965
Growth regulated nuclear 68 protein 66,881
Elongation factor 1-alpha 35,205
Protein disulfide isomerase-related protein 5 (protein disulfide isomerase A5) 46,170
ATP synthase beta (ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, beta polypeptide) 56,525
Matrix metalloproteinase 1 (interstitial collagenase) 27,105
a

None detected.

Cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS treated with 40 or 60 μM AG18 showed a decreased ~42 kDa protein expression compared against those on PBS-adsorbed TCPS without AG18 (Table 1). Twelve proteins were found in cells on PBS-adsorbed samples without AG18 (Table 6). No proteins were identified from cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 40 or 60 μM AG18. Cells on Alb-adsorbed TCPS without AG18 showed decreased ~42 kDa protein expression versus those on PBS-adsorbed TCPS without AG18 (Table 1). Mutant beta actin was identified from cells on both Alb-and PBS-adsorbed TCPS samples without AG18. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 was also identified from cells on Alb-adsorbed samples without AG18. Eleven unique proteins were identified in U937 on PBS-adsorbed TCPS without AG18 (Table 6). Cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS with 20 μM AG18 showed decreased protein expression versus those on PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 20 μM AG18 (Table 1). No proteins were identified from cells on PBS-adsorbed samples; however, eight proteins were identified from those on FN-adsorbed TCPS (Table 6).

Table 6.

Comparison of ~42 kDa protein band from adherent U937a

[AG18] (μM) Protein Molecular wt. (Da)
Comparison of PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 0 or 40 μM AG18
0 Centrosome protein cep920 (CTCL tumor antigen se2-2) 88,383
Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin) 41,786
Desmoglein (type 1) 113,644
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 36,031
Alpha enolase 47,079
Hqp0256 protein 31,162
Apolipoprotein B precursor 187,126
Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, mitochondrial 49,917
Vimentin 53,653
Ribosomal protein L3 45,440
NCL protein 50,920
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma 50,115
40 N/Db
Comparison of PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 0 or 60 μM AG18
0 Centrosome protein cep920 (CTCL tumor antigen se2-2) 88,383
Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin) 41,786
Desmoglein (type 1) 113,644
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 36,031
Alpha enolase 47,079
Hqp0256 protein 31,162
Apolipoprotein B precursor 187,126
Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, mitochondrial 49,917
Vimentin 53,653
Ribosomal protein L3 45,440
NCL protein 50,920
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma 50,115
60 N/Db
Surface ligand Protein Molecular wt. (Da)

Comparison of Alb- or PBS-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
Alb Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin) 41,786
Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 precursor 46,597
PBS Centrosome protein cep920 (CTCL tumor antigen se2-2) 88,383
Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin) 41,786
Desmoglein (type 1) 113,644
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 36,031
Alpha enolase 47,079
Hqp0256 protein 31,162
Apolipoprotein B precursor 187,126
Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, mitochondrial 49,917
Vimentin 53,653
Ribosomal protein L3 45,440
NCL protein 50,920
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma 50,115
Comparison of FN- or PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 20 μM AG18
FN Alpha enolase 47,079
Beta actin variant 41,738
Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, mitochondrial (CGI-44 protein) 49,917
Vimentin 53,653
Laminin-binding protein 31,774
NCL protein 50,920
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma 50,115
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 46,615
PBS N/Db
a

Common proteins are in bold text.

b

None detected.

Previous densitometry showed that cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS treated with 60 or 80 μM AG18 exhibited increased ~23 kDa protein expression compared to those on PBS-adsorbed TCPS without AG18 (Table 1). No proteins were identified from cells on PBS-adsorbed samples without AG18. Twelve and eight proteins were identified from cells on PBS-adsorbed samples with 60 or 80 μM AG18, respectively (Table 7). Cells on Alb-adsorbed TCPS with 40 or 80 μM AG18 were compared against those on Alb-adsorbed TCPS without AG18 (Table 1). No proteins were identified from cells on Alb-adsorbed samples with 0, 40 or 80 μM AG18. Cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS exhibited increased ~23 kDa protein expression versus those on PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 40 μM AG18 (Table 1). No proteins were identified from cells on PBS-adsorbed samples cultured with 40 μM AG18, but 11 proteins were identified from cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS (Table 7). Cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS with 80 μM AG18 showed decreased ~23 kDa expression compared to those without AG18 (Table 1). Peroxiredoxin 1 and histone H1.4 were found in cells with 0 or 80 μM AG18. Testicular H1 histone was also found in cells without AG18 while eight unique proteins were found in cells with 80 μM AG18 (Table 7). There is no consistent trend in protein expression elicited by protein-adsorbed TCPS and increasing concentrations of AG18 as revealed by nanospray LC/MS.

Table 7.

Comparison of ~23 kDa protein band from adherent U937a

[AG18] (μM) Protein Molecular wt. (Da)
Comparison of PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 0 or 60 μM AG18
0 N/Db
60 Glutathione S-transferase A1 23,159
peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
40S ribosomal protein S5 22,763
Ribosomal protein L10 9,389
Histone H1.4 (histone 1, H1b) 22,566
Ribosomal protein L13a 16,720
Histone H1 21,352
Chain A, structure of Lamin AC GLOBULAR DOMAIN 13,360
Ribosomal protein L18 21,637
High Mobility Group protein 2 (HMGB2 protein) 22,268
60S ribosomal protein L13 24,247
Chain L, crystal structure of the Fab Fragment of the monoclonal antibody mak33 23,438
Comparison of PBS-adsorbed TCPS with 0 or 80 μM AG18
0 N/Db
80 40S ribosomal protein S5 22,763
Histone H2A.o (histone H2A.2) 13,899
(60S) ribosomal protein L10 9,389
Histone H1 21,352
Chain A, structure of lamin AC GLOBULAR DOMAIN 13,360
Ribosomal protein L18 21,637
60S ribosomal protein L14 (CAG-ISL 7) 23,275
Ribosomal protein L15 24,071
Surface ligand Protein Molecular wt. (Da)

Comparison of PBS- or FN-adsorbed TCPS with 40 μm AG18
PBS N/Db
FN HDCMB21P 12,533
Heterogeneous ribonuclear protein A2 (hnRNP protein A2) 35,984
Nonhistone chromosomal protein HMG-1 24,968
Peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
(60S) ribosomal protein L10 23,903
Histone H1.2 21,352
60S ribosomal protein L14 (CAG-ISL 7) 23,275
High Mobility Group protein 2 (HMGB2 protein) 22,268
Caspase recruitment domain protein 5 21,613
60S ribosomal protein L15 24,145
Chain L, crystal structure of the fab fragment of the monoclonal antibody mak33 23,438
[AG18] (μM) Protein Molecular wt. (Da)

Comparison of FN-adsorbed TCPS with 0 or 80 μM AG18
0 Peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
Histone H1.4 (HPRD: histone 1 H1E) (histone H1b) 21,721
Testicular H1 histone 22,020
80 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 5 8,216
Peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
Myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen 45,807
Heterogeneous ribonuclear protein A2 (hnRNP protein A2) 35,984
Ost-I 102,111
Ribosomal protein L13a 16,720
Testicular H1 histone 22,020
Ribosomal protein L15 24,071
High Mobility Group protein 2 (HMGB2 protein) 22,268
Chain L, crystal structure of the fab fragment of the monoclonal antibody mak33 23,438
a

Common proteins are in bold text.

b

None detected.

4. Effect of AG18 concentration

Table 8 shows the culture conditions from Table 1 arranged by ligand and molecular weight. This comparison will reveal the effect of increasing concentrations of AG18 on U937 adherent to surface-adsorbed proteins. The effect of increasing concentrations of AG18 on the expression of ~65/70, ~42 and ~23 kDa proteins in U937 adherent on PBS-adsorbed TCPS was elucidated (Table 9). At ~65/70 kDa, five proteins were identified in cells without AG18. Only titin, which can be tyrosine phosphorylated, was found in cells with 20 μM AG18. No proteins were identified from cells cultured with 40 μM AG18. At ~42 kDa there were 12 proteins identified from cells without AG18. No proteins were identified in cells with 20, 40 or 60 μM AG18. Thus AG18 down regulates the expression of 12 proteins found in cells adherent to PBS treated TCPS without AG18. The opposite phenomenon was observed at ~23 kDa where no proteins were identified from cells treated with 0, 20 or 40 μM AG18. However, 12 and 8 proteins were identified in cells with 60 and 80 μM AG18, respectively. Five proteins were found in both the 60 and 80 μM AG18 samples. Therefore at ~23 kDa, AG18 appears to up regulate the expression of proteins in cells with 60 or 80 μM that are not present in cells with 0, 20, or 40 μM while at ~42 and ~65/70 kDa AG18 appears to down regulate intracellular protein expression.

Table 8.

Summary of conditions for elucidating the effect of varying AG18 concentrations

Surface ligand PBS Alb FN



[AG18] (μM) 0 20 40 60 80 0 40 80 0 20 40 80
Molecular wt. (kDa) 200 x
160 x x x x x
130 x x x
100/90 x x x
70/65 x x x
52 x x x x x x
42 x x x x x x x
23 x x x x x x x x x x x

x—Samples obtained.

Table 9.

Effect of varying concentrations of AG18 upon protein expression in adherent U937 cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPSa

[AG18] (μM) Protein Molecular wt. (Da)
Protein expression at 65 kDa
0 ATP-dependent DNA helicase II, 70 kDa subunit (thyroid autoantigen 70 kDa (Ku antigen) 69,799
DNA helicase Q1 73,366
Heat shock-related 70 kDa protein 2 (heat shock protein) 69,952
Lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (L-plastin polypeptide) 63,839
ATP synthase beta (chain) (ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, beta polypeptide) 54,460
20 Titinb 2,991,589
40 N/Dc
Protein expression at ~42 kDa
0 Centrosome protein cep920 (CTCL tumor antigen se2-2) 88,383
Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin) 41,786
Desmoglein (type 1) 113,644
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 36,031
Alpha enolase (2-phosphopyruvate-hydratase alpha-enolase; carbonate dehydratase) 47,079
Hqp0256 protein 31,162
Apolipoprotein B precursor 187,126
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 (urokinase inhibitor) 49,917
Vimentin 53,653
Ribosomal protein L3 45,440
NCL protein 50,920
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma 50,115
20 N/Dc
40 N/Dc
60 N/Dc
Protein expression at ~23 kDa
0 N/Dc
20 N/Dc
40 N/Dc
60 Glutathione S-transferase A1 (glutathione transferase (EC 2.5.1.18)/fatty-acyl-ethyl-ester synthase) 23,159
Peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
40S ribosomal protein S5 22,763
60S ribosomal protein L10 9389
Histone H1.4 (histone 1, H1b) 22,566
Ribosomal protein L13a 16,720
Histone H1 21,352
Chain A, structure of Lamin AC GLOBULAR DOMAIN 13,360
Ribosomal protein L18 21,637
High Mobility Group protein 2 (HMGB2 protein) 22,268
60S ribosomal protein L13 24,247
Chain L, crystal structure of the fab fragment of the monoclonal antibody mak33 23,438
80 40S ribosomal protein S5 22,763
Histone H2A.o (histone H2A.2) 13,899
60S ribosomal protein L10 9389
Histone H1 21,352
Chain A, structure of Lamin AC GLOBULAR DOMAIN 13,360
Ribosomal protein L18 21,637
60S ribosomal protein L14 (CAG-ISL 7) 23,275
Ribosomal protein L15 24,071
a

Common proteins are highlighted in bold text.

b

Tyrosine phosphorylated.

c

None detected.

The effect of AG18 concentration upon intracellular protein expression of U937 adherent to Alb-adsorbed TCPS could not be resolved at ~23 kDa because no proteins were identified from cells at 0, 40 or 80 μM AG18.

The effect of increasing AG18 concentration was identified in cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS (Table 10). Peroxiredoxin 1 was identified in cells treated with 0, 40 or 80 μM AG18. Testicular H1 histone was identified in cells with 0 and 80 μM AG18 but not in cells with 40 μM AG18. Histone H1.4 was unique to cells without AG18. Ten unique proteins were identified from cells with 40 μM AG18. Eight proteins were identified only in cells with 80 μM AG18. Four proteins were common to cells with 40 and 80 μM AG18 but not cells without AG18. These proteins were hnRNP protein A2, high mobility group protein 2, 60S ribosomal protein L15 and an Ig fragment. Therefore AG18 at 0, 40 and 80 μM appears to affect different sets of ~23 kDa proteins expressed in cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS. Overall increasing concentrations of AG18 down or up regulate a unique set of proteins in U937 adhered on a given protein-adsorbed surface.

Table 10.

Effect of varying concentrations of AG18 upon protein expression in adherent U937 cells on FN-adsorbed TCPSa

[AG18] (μM) Protein Molecular wt. (Da)
Protein expression at 23 kDa
0 Peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
Histone H1.4 (HPRD: histone 1 H1E) (histone H1b) 21,721
Testicular H1 histone 22,020
40 HDCMB21P 12,533
Heterogeneous ribonuclear protein A2 (hnRNP protein A2) 35,984
Nonhistone chromosomal protein HMG-1 24,968
Peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
(60S) ribosomal protein L10 23,903
histone H1.2 21,352
60S ribosomal protein L14 (CAG-ISL 7) 23,275
High Mobility Group protein 2 (HMGB2 protein) 22,268
Caspase recruitment domain protein 5 21,613
60S ribosomal protein L15 24,145
Chain L, crystal structure of the fab fragment of the monoclonal antibody mak33 23,438
80 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 5 (proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, non-ATPase, 5) 8216
Peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
Myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen 45,807
Heterogeneous ribonuclear protein A2 (hnRNP protein A2) 35,984
Ost-I 102,111
Ribosomal protein L13a 16,720
Testicular H1 histone 22,020
60S ribosomal protein L15 24,145
High Mobility Group protein 2 (HMGB2 protein) 22,268
Chain L, Crystal structure of the fab fragment of the monoclonal antibody mak33 23,438
a

Proteins common to 0 μM AG18 are highlighted in bold text.

5. Effect of surface-adsorbed ligands

Cells adherent to Alb- and FN-adsorbed TCPS were compared to cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS to determine the effect different ligand–receptor interactions have upon intracellular protein expression (Table 11). The effect of adsorbed Alb on ~160, ~52, ~42 and ~23 kDa protein expression in adherent U937 without AG18 was elucidated (Table 12). No ~160 kDa proteins were identified from cells on Alb-adsorbed TCPS without AG18. DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit was found in cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~160 kDa. Titin and tubulin 5-beta were found in cells on Alb-adsorbed TCPS while five different proteins were found in U937 on PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~52 kDa (Table 12). Two of those five proteins were Ig fragments. At ~42 kDa mutant beta actin was identified in cells on PBS- and Alb-adsorbed TCPS samples. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 precursor was also identified in cells on Alb-adsorbed TCPS without AG18. Eleven unique proteins were identified from cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~42 kDa. There were no proteins identified from cells on PBS- or Alb-adsorbed samples at ~23 kDa. Thus Alb appears to regulate the expression of a unique set of U937 proteins when compared to those on PBS treated TCPS at ~52 and ~42 kDa.

Table 11.

Summary of conditions for analyzing the effect of surface-adsorbed ligands

Surface ligand [AG18] (μM) PBS
0
Alb
0
FN
0
Molecular wt. (kDa) 200 x
160 x x x
130 x x
100/90 x x
70/65 x
52 x x x
42 x x x
23 x x x

x—Samples obtained.

Table 12.

The effect of Alb-adsorbed TCPS upon protein expression in adherent U937 cellsa

Surface ligand Protein Molecular wt. (Da)
Comparison of ~160 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or Alb-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
PBS DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-dependent protein kinase) 99,816
Alb N/Db
Comparison of ~52 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or Alb-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
PBS ATP synthase beta 54,460
TPO autoantibody immunoglobulin heavy chain, V-region (TR1.41) 13,367
Anti-colorectal carcinoma heavy chain 50,570
HLA-B-associated transcript 1 (BAT1 gene product) 33,121
Growth regulated nuclear 68 protein 66,881
Alb Titinc 2,991,589
Tubulin 5-beta 49,599
Comparison of ~42 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or Alb-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
PBS Centrosome protein cep920 (CTCL tumor antigen se2-2) 88,383
Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin) 41,786
Desmoglein (type 1) 113,644
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 36,031
Alpha enolase 47,079
Hqp0256 protein 31,162
Apolipoprotein B precursor 187,126
Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, mitochondrial 49,917
Vimentin 53,653
Ribosomal protein L3 45,440
NCL protein 50,920
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma 50,115
Alb Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin) 41,786
Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 precursor 46,597
a

Common proteins are in bold text.

b

None Detected.

c

Tyrosine phosphorylated.

The effect of adsorbed FN on intracellular protein expression was compared against adsorbed PBS at six molecular weights ranging from ~160 to ~23 kDa (Table 13). No proteins were identified from cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS at ~160 kDa. DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit was found in cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS, however. DNA topoiosmerase II beta and dedicator of cytokinesis protein 2 (DOCK 2) were found in cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~130 kDa. No proteins were found in cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS at ~130 kDa. DNA topoisomerase II beta and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit were found in cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS at ~100 kDa. No proteins were identified from cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~100 kDa. At ~52 kDa growth-regulated nuclear 68 protein and two Ig fragments were found in cells on both PBS- and FN-adsorbed TCPS (Table 13). Vimentin and mitochondrial ATP synthase beta subunit (AA 1-312) were identified only in cells adherent to FN treated TCPS. HLA-B associated transcript 1 was found in cells adherent to PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~52 kDa. At ~42 kDa vimentin, NCL protein and eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma were detected in cells adhered to both PBS- and FN-treated TCPS. Six unique proteins were identified in cells on the FN samples at ~42 kDa; nine proteins were identified only in cells on PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~42 kDa. Peroxiredoxin 1, histone H1.4 and testicular H1 histone were found in the ~23 kDa samples from cells on FN-adsorbed TCPS. No proteins were identified from cells adherent to PBS-adsorbed TCPS at ~23 kDa. Based on the LC/MS data, surface-adsorbed FN appears to regulate a unique set of proteins in adherent U937 cells compared against PBS at molecular weights ranging from ~160 to ~23 kDa. This data appears to show a change in cellular signaling pathway mediated by surface-adsorbed ligand.

Table 13.

The effect of FN-adsorbed TCPS upon protein expression in adherent U937 cellsa

Surface ligand Protein Molecular wt. (Da)
Comparison of ~160 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or FN-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
PBS DNA dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-dependent protein kinase) 99,816
FN N/Db
Comparison of ~130 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or FN-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
PBS DNA topoisomerase II beta 180,501
Dedicator of cytokinesis protein 2 (DOCK2 protein) 38,436
FN N/Db
Comparison of ~100 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or FN-adsporbed TCPS without AG18
PBS N/Db
FN DNA topoisomerase II beta 182,578
DNA dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit 465,266
Comparison of ~52 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or FN-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
PBS TPO autoantibody immunoglobulin heavy chain, V-region (TR1.41) 13,367
Anti-colorectal carcinoma heavy chain 50,570
HLA-B-associated transcript 1 (BAT1 gene product) 33,121
Growth regulated nuclear 68 protein 66,881
FNb TPO autoantibody immunoglobulin heavy chain, V-region (TR1.41) 13,367
Anti-colorectal carcinoma heavy chain 50,570
Vimentin 53,653
Mitochondrial ATP synthase beta chain 34,026
Growth regulated nuclear 68 protein 66,881
Comparison of ~42 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or FN-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
PBS CTCL tumor antigen se2-2 88,383
Mutant beta-actin (beta’-actin) 41,786
Desmoglein type 1 113,644
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 36,031
Alpha enolase 47,079
Hqp0256 protein 31,162
Apolipoprotein B precursor 187,126
Sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, Mitochondrial 49,917
Vimentin 53,653
Ribosomal protein L3 45,440
NCL protein 50,920
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma 50,115
FN Beta actin variant 41,738
Lamin A/C 53,219
Vimentin 53,653
40S ribosomal protein SA (laminin-binding protein) 31,774
NCL protein 50,920
Muscle specific enolase 46,957
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2, subunit 3 gamma, 52 kDa 51,077
Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 gamma 50,115
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 46,615
Comparison of ~23 kDa proteins from cells on PBS- or FN-adsorbed TCPS without AG18
PBS N/Db
FN Peroxiredoxin 1 22,096
Histone H1.4 (histone H1b) 21,721
Testicular H1 histone 22,020
a

Common proteins are in bold text.

b

None detected.

6. Conclusions

Based on the proteins identified by LC/MS from adherent U937 cells, there appears to be a shift in intracellular signaling mediated by different surface-adsorbed ligands interacting with macrophages. This shift appears to be modulated by a complex combination of surface-adsorbed ligand such as Alb or FN and increasing concentrations of AG18. Macrophage activation may be altered by this shift in intracellular signaling in response to surface-adsorbed ligands therefore modulating the host response by activating different genes. However, more work resolving the actual signaling cascades is needed to fully understand any signaling shifts and their implications regarding the host inflammatory response.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded partly by NIH HL077825. The author would like to acknowledge Jim Brown for help with LC/MS.

References

  • 1.Pucillo CEM, Colombatti A, Vitale M, Salzano S, Rossi G, Formisano S. Interactions of promonocytic U937 cells with proteins of the extracellular matrix. Immunology. 1993;80(2):248–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roman J. Extracellular matrix and lung inflammation. Immunol Res. 1996;15(2):163–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02918505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hynes RO. Cell adhesion: old and new questions. Trends Cell Biol. 1999;9:M33–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jockush BM, Bubeck P, Giehl K, Kroemker M, Moschner J, Rothkegel M, et al. The molecular architecture of focal adhesions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1995;11:379–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.11.110195.002115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Juliano RL. Signal transduction by cell adhesion receptors and the cytoskeleton: functions of integrins, cadherins, selectins, and immunoglobulin-superfamily members. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2002;42:283–323. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.42.090401.151133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stupack DG, Cheresh DA. Get a ligand, get a life: integrins, signaling and cell survival. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:3729–38. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ly DP, Corbett SA. The integrin α5β1 regulates αvβ3-mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. J Surg Res. 2005;123:200–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ruoslahti E. RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:697–715. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dsouza SE, Ginsberg MH, Plow EF. Arginyl–glycyl–aspartic acid (RGD)—a cell adhesion motif. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991;16(7):246–50. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90096-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen XX, Zuckerman ST, Kao WJ. Intracellular protein phosphorylation in adherent U937 monocytes mediated by various culture conditions and fibronectin-derived surface ligands. Biomaterials. 2005;26(8):873–82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Iida M, Anna CH, Hartis J, Bruno M, et al. Changes in global gene and protein expression during early mouse liver carcinogenesis induced by non-genotoxic model carcinogens oxazepam and Wyeth-14,643. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24(4):757–70. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgg011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Langrea MA, Wallis BS, Gillespie JW, Gannot G, Emmert-Buck MR, Chuaqui RF. Novel proteomic approaches for tissue analysis. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2004;1(2):185–92. doi: 10.1586/14789450.1.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Verhoeckx KCM, Bijlsma S, de Groene EM, Witkamp RF, van der Greef J, Rodenburg RJT. A combination of proteomics, principal component analysis and transcriptomics is a powerful tool for the identification of biomarkers for macrophage maturation in the U937 cell line. Proteomics. 2004;4(4):1014–28. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guerrera IC, Kleiner O. Application of mass spectrometry in proteomics. Biosci Rep. 2005;25(1–2):71–93. doi: 10.1007/s10540-005-2849-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mann M, Ong SE, Gronborg M, Steen H, Jensen ON, Pandey A. Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20(6):261–8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01944-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Steen H, Mann M. The ABC’s (and XYZ’s) of peptide sequencing. Nat Rev. 2004;5:699–711. doi: 10.1038/nrm1468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nesvizhskii AI, Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data—the protein inference problem. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005;4(10):1419–40. doi: 10.1074/mcp.R500012-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sundstrom C, Nilsson K. Establishment and characterization of a human histiocytic lymphoma cell line (U-937) Int J Cancer. 1976;17:565–77. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910170504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pappin DJC, Hojrup P, Bleasby AJ. Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting. Curr Biol. 1993;3(6):327–32. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(93)90195-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES