Graphical abstract
1. Introduction
Advances in technology now enable infrared and Raman vibrational spectroscopic imaging with resolution on the molecular scale. A number of techniques have emerged that provide spectroscopic imaging with nanometer scale resolution including: tip-enhanced Raman scattering (TERS), infrared scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (IR s-SNOM), atomic force microscopy infrared (AFM-IR), and photo-induced force microscopy (PiFM). In this article we profile recent advances in nanoscale spectroscopic imaging, discussing differences in the methods, highlighting recent technical advances, and reporting applications with each approach.
Since the first demonstrations showing that spectroscopy can inform about the chemical composition of images in a microscope, 1 researchers have investigated advances in instrumentation to improve the sensitivity, spatial resolution, and specificity of these spectroscopic imaging techniques. 2–5 In particular the chemical rich signal of vibrational spectroscopies, both infrared and Raman, have attracted considerable interest. Applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopic imaging span diverse applications from biomedical diagnostics, to forensics, cultural heritage, and materials characterization. 6–9
There have been a number of recent advances using vibrational signals as markers for selective imaging. 10 For example, a recent study showed the vibrational signal of a triple bond made an effective tag for more sensitive stimulated Raman imaging. 11 Other examples include the development of surface enhanced Raman tags, where a specific enhanced signal marks an analyte of interest. 12, 13 In this article we limit our review to reports that measure a spectrum to discriminate and identify molecular components, or changes in molecular components, using the detected spectroscopic signals.
Advances in hardware have been particularly influential in advancing infrared and Raman imaging. In particular, the last few years have seen the commercialization of a number of techniques, which combine vibrational spectroscopy with scanning probe microscopes to provide spectroscopic imaging on nanometer length scales. These techniques, including TERS, IR s-SNOM, AFM-IR, and PiFM, are providing unprecedented spatial resolution and chemical contrast. In many ways these techniques appear quite similar and the differences between the techniques can be difficult to discern. In all of these methodologies, an optical response (e.g. absorption, scattering, induced dipole) is combined with a scanning probe microscope to provide increased spatial resolution and increased sensitivity. Many of these techniques are enabled by advances in instrumentation and suggest increased facility obtaining experimental results by non-experts.
2. TERS
TERS combines Raman spectroscopy and s-SNOM to provide an ultrasensitive approach for spectroscopic imaging at nanoscale, beyond the diffraction limit. TERS uses a nanostructured metallic scanning probe microscope tip to confine and enhance the electric field of the incident light at the tip apex, and therefore generate enhanced Raman scattering from molecules within immediate proximity of the tip. By scanning a sample under the TERS tip, a Raman image with chemical specific information can be obtained with spatial resolution on the scale of the confined near-field. Since the first introduction of TERS in 2000, 14–17 significant progress has been made in the understanding of TERS mechanisms, development of TERS techniques, and the application of TERS to various problems. Thorough reviews of the theory, technical details, and experimental setups of TERS can be found elsewhere. 18–22 Here we review the most recent advances in TERS and its applications as a spectroscopic imaging technique.
2.1. Technical Advances of TERS
2.1.1. TERS Tip Fabrication
A plasmonic metal tip is the most critical component in TERS that serves as a near-field optical antenna, which confines the propagating far-field radiation to the strongly localized electromagnetic near field. Since the size, shape, and composition of the TERS tip strongly affects the localized surface plasmon resonance, which further affects the detected TERS signal, it is important to develop fabrication procedures that can produce tips with high enhancement factors and reproducible geometries.
A common way to fabricate solid metal (e.g. Ag and Au) tips, which are typically used in STM-TERS, is electrochemical etching, which electrochemically dissolves a metal wire in the etching electrolyte. 23–27 By adjusting the etching parameters, the size and shape of the etched tip can be controlled. 24 Recent studies have also shown the etchant composition and concentration affects the shape of the resulting tips. 26, 27 However, it is still difficult to precisely tune the tip size and shape by electrochemical etching alone. Over-etching is a common problem, particularly in the case of silver tips. To address this problem, the Ren group developed an optical method that uses a machine vision system to monitor the fabrication process of silver tips and quickly cutoff the etching circuit once the tip forms. 23
In the case of AFM-TERS, metal-coated tips are often used. These tips are fabricated by the deposition or attachment of Au or Ag onto commercially available AFM tips. Compared to electrochemically etched metal tips, metal-coated TERS tips typically have better-defined geometry and thus generate more reproducible TERS signals.
Other approaches to fabricating metal-coated TERS tips are to attach pre-synthesized plasmonic nanostructures to the end of an AFM tip. Leiterer et al. successfully demonstrated TERS from a tip prepared by positioning an individual presynthesized plasmonic nanoparticles on commercial AFM tips by dielectrophoresis. 28 Kim et al. used a DNA linker to attach Au nanoparticles onto AFM tips, and then used the attached Au as a core to facilitate the deposition of an Ag shell. 29 In a recent study, AFM tips were coated with self-assembled monolayers of block copolymers loaded with clusters of bimetallic, gold and silver nanoparticle heterostructures to form highly enhancing TERS tips. 30 By varying the nanometal loadings into the polymer micelles, the resulting tip properties were optimized for reproducibility.
The direct deposition of metals onto the apex of conductive AFM tips can also produce TERS tips. Applying short potential pulses between the tip and a sacrificial electrode in close proximity electrochemically deposits noble metals onto commercial AFM tips. 31–33 The morphology and radius of the coated tips is controlled by the deposition potential and deposition time with high reproducibility, which enabled a systematical investigation of the effect of tip radius on the TERS enhancement. Ma et al. reported a method for the local deposition of spherical Au or Ag onto optically inactive W- or C- tips, which is achieved by the local charging of the electrodes with short pulses and the local build up of the ion concentration. 32 By tuning the pulse duration, deposition time, and the gap distance between the tip and the electrode, the diameter of the deposited nanospheres was varied from tens of nanometers to one micrometer. Bakhti and co-workers reported a technique to grow single gold filaments based on a bias-assisted electro-reduction of gold ions directly at the AFM tip apex. 33 The length of the formed filaments can be tuned from tens to hundreds nanometers and the radius can be as low as few nanometers, though the TERS performance remains to be evaluated.
Recently, Taguchi et al. reported using standard vacuum vapor deposition to fabricate multiple metal grains on SiO2 AFM tips, in order to produce high and reproducible enhancement in TERS. 34 Their experiments and simulations show that the plasmonic enhancement strongly depends on the number of grains and the grain separation. Multiple grains arranged closely but discretely (within a few nanometers) on a dielectric probe act as an efficient plasmonic antenna. One challenge of the standard vacuum vapor deposition method is to accurately control the size and shape of the evaporated tips. A novel way to overcome this challenge is to use focused ion beam (FIB) milling to provide a precise control of the shape of the tips. Several groups have reported FIB milling based methods to precisely control the fabrication of plasmonic metal tips with tunable length and shape. 35, 36 These studies demonstrate that by varying the geometry of the tips, the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) can be fine-tuned at a desired absorption channel that favors the TERS experiments. It’s worth noting that the LSPR scattering spectra from the tip apex depends on the polarization of the incident light, therefore optimization of TERS measurements can be achieved by tuning the excitation polarization to induce the largest LSPR signal. 37
A common issue with TERS tips is the short lifetime. The typical Au or Ag tips are prone to unwanted chemisorption in air, which may interfere with the detected TERS signal. In addition, atmospheric corrosion of Ag tips greatly compromises their use in TERS experiments within just a few days. Several studies have been carried out to improve the chemical stability and extend the plasmonic lifetime of the tips. 38–40 The Zenobi group developed a simple electrochemical method for recovering the corroded Ag tips and showed that the recovered tips have a field enhancement factor comparable to freshly prepared Ag tips. 38 Another way to prevent atmospheric corrosion of Ag tips is to isolate oxygen from the storage environment of the tips. The Roy group systematically investigated the plasmonic degradation of Ag tip under different environmental conditions, and demonstrated that the low oxygen and low moisture environment in a glovebox can significantly extend the lifetime of Ag tips from a few hours to several months. 39 In another study, the Zenobi group demonstrated that by coating an ultrathin and pinhole-free silica shell on top of the noble-metal nanostructures, the strongly enhancing tips are protected from undesired chemisorption and have a significantly longer lifetime than unprotected tips. 40
2.1.2. Subnanometer Spatial Resolution
High spatial resolution is one of the intrinsic features of TERS. Recently, multiple studies have achieved spatial resolution of 1 nm and lower. 41–46 Using STM-TERS under ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV) and low temperature conditions, the Dong group successfully distinguished adjacent molecules of similar chemical structures with a spatial resolution of ~0.6 nm. 42 The same research group also reported TERS imaging of individual DNA bases with similar subnanometer resolution (Figure 1). 46 The characteristic TERS peaks were chosen as the spectral fingerprint for rapid differentiation, demonstrating the potential of TERS as a new method to realize single-molecule DNA sequencing on surfaces. Using UHV-TERS, the Van Duyne group interrogated the conformational switch between two metastable surface-mediated isomers on Cu (111) at room temperature, demonstrating the ability to unambiguously distinguish the conformational differences between neighboring molecules with angstrom-scale spatial resolution. 44 For more applications of UHV-TERS, the Van Duyne group recently published a review in this area. 47 In addition to STM-TERS, the Deckert group reported AFM-TERS studies on protein fibrils, which reveal a surprising capability to distinguish amino acid distributions locally on a length scale of at least 1 nm. 41, 45 Though recent experiments demonstrate that subnanometer spatial resolution can be achieved by TERS, the origin of this ultra-high resolution defies the classic electromagnetic enhancement explanation, and currently remains unresolved.
Several theoretical studies have been carried out in an effort to explain the origin of the super high spatial resolution observed in recent TERS experiments. Meng et al. proposed a physical mechanism suggesting the ultra-high spatial resolution of TERS arises from the electric field gradient effect due to the tighter spatial confinement and sensitivity to the infrared-active of molecules. 48 Zhang et al. proposed another theory that accounts for the strong near-field self-interaction of molecule within the plasmonic nanogap, which strongly modulates the Raman response in both the signal intensity and spatial sensitivity. 49, 50 A finite element method calculation was presented by the Deckert group, in which an atomic protrusion, or defect, on the TERS probe coule account for the ultra-high spatial resolution. 51 The same group also investigated the influence of tip-molecule conformation on the obtained Raman signal and concluded that the geometric structure of the molecule with respect to the tip could also contribute to the subnanometer spatial resolution. 52 Most recently, the Jensen group presented a systematic theoretical study of TERS imaging of single molecules, using a hybrid atomistic electrodynamics–quantum mechanical method. 53 Their work suggests that achieving the atomic resolution requires the near field to be confined within a few angstroms in diameter and the near-field focal plane to coincide with the plane of the molecule.
2.2. Applications of TERS
2.2.1. TERS in Material Sciences
2.2.1.1. Carbon Materials
TERS is most widely applied to characterize various carbon materials, such as graphene and carbon nanotubes (CNTs). These materials present simple and intense Raman bands: G-band (~1580 cm−1) attributed to in-plane vibrational modes, the 2D-band (also called G′-band, ~2690 cm−1), a second-order overtone of a different in-plane vibration, and disorder-induced D-band (~1350 cm−1). Intensities and ratios of certain bands provide information on purity, defects, edges, and number of layers of these carbon materials. 54 Compared with conventional Raman spectroscopy, TERS provides detailed information about subtle structural variation of graphene and CNTs with high spatial resolution commensurate with the sizes of the materials.
Beams et al. demonstrated that a single 5 nm particle can induce a radial strain over a lateral distance of ~170 nm in graphene by monitoring the 2D-band using TERS. 55 In another study, TERS revealed the nanoscale strain variation by ridge nanostructures, which cannot be seen with micro-Raman imaging, in a SiC-grown epitaxial graphene microislands. 56 Takuya et al. investigated local doping concentration modulation of gaphene flakes. 57 By spectral line scanning across the edge of graphene, the localization of the D-band enhancement was observed at the edge boundary. With a gap-mode TERS configuration, Lagugne-Labarthet and co-workers utilized distinct excitation polarizations to discriminate the edges of a graphene flake of a few layers. 58 The intensity ratio of the D/G bands provides information about the edge type and orientation of the flakes. More recently, Su et al. used non-gap mode TERS to successfully map the intrinsic defects in single layer graphene with 20 nm spatial resolution. 59
A CNT is effectively a sheet of graphene rolled in to a cylinder, with unique electrical and mechanical properties. The spectral modes of CNTs are similar to those of graphene. In a recent TERS study, the intensity ratio of 2D/G bands was found to be sensitive to the number of walls of a multi-walled CNT. 60 Moreover, TERS mapping has been demonstrated to successfully identify and characterize single-walled CNTs even fully embedded in a polymer matrix. 61 Sheremet et al. reported the nanoscale imaging and discrimination of individual constituents in a four-component carbonaceous sample using TERS, demonstrating its great potential to study complex carbon systems with high spatial resolution. 62
2.2.1.2. Other Materials
TERS imaging has provided valuable information about the self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of organic molecules immobilized on flat gold substrates. 63–65 The Ren group applied TERS to probe the subtle change of intermolecular interactions during the assembly of a pyridine-terminated aromatic thiol. 63 It was observed that the aromatic C=C bond stretching vibration is very sensitive to the intermolecular π–π stacking and can be used to monitor the strength of the intermolecular interactions in SAMs. By using combined TERS measurements and density functional theory calculations, Zenobi and co-workers provided insight into the molecular orientation and intermolecular π–π stacking interaction on monolayers prepared by different methods. 65
Layered two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (e.g. WSe2, WS2, MoS2) have emerged as potential platforms for novel electronic and optical devices with properties that strongly dependent on nanoscale structural heterogeneity. There are several TERS investigations into the excitonic properties of these materials. 27, 66–68
In addition to the above-mentioned materials, the advantages of TERS have also been exploited to study properties of other inorganic oxide samples, including iron oxide nanoparticles, 69 double perovskite thin films, 70 and strained silicon for semiconductor devices. 71
2.2.2 TERS in Life Sciences
2.2.2.1. DNAs
Some interesting studies on DNA molecules have been reported lately. It was recently demonstrated that TERS is able to unambiguously distinguish two individual complementary DNA bases (adenine and thymine) with a spatial resolution down to 0.9 nm. 46 Furthermore, another study illustrated the sensitivity of TERS to detect base-to-base transitions (adenine to cytosine) in a single-strand DNA under ambient conditions. 72 TERS has also been applied to assess the chemical differences between plasmid-free DNA and plasmid-embedded DNA. 73
In order to obtain reliable TERS signal to differentiate single bases, it is crucial to maintain a well-defined conformation of DNA molecules on the substrate, as changes in conformation or orientation of DNA gives rise to different TERS signals. Immobilization methods based on Mg/Mn ions and silanes have been reported to preserve different conformations of DNA molecules, and TERS has been successfully applied to assess the conformational changes of single DNA molecules. 74, 75
2.2.2.2. Proteins and Peptides
TERS has been applied in a number of studies on protein fibrils, including insulin fibrils, 45, 76, 77 prion protein amyloid fibrils, 78 milk protein β-lactoglobulin, 79 human islet amyloid precursor peptide fibrils, 80 and other disease-related peptide fibrils. 81 The high chemical sensitivity and spatial resolution of TERS enabled specific characterization of protein secondary structures and conformational changes on the fibril surface. For example, the Deckert group performed a systematic investigation of individual insulin amyloid fibrils, focusing on the identification of the secondary structure via the amide III band and the differentiation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic domains on the surface. 45 They also investigated the conformational differences of the fibrilized insulin in the presence of different inhibition agents. 76 Recently, Bonhommeau et al. demonstrated that Aβ1–42 peptide fibrils implicated in Alzheimer’s disease can be distinguishedfrom synthetic oligomers by measuring amide I and amide III bands using TERS. 81 It should be noted that the amide I band remains controversial in TERS experiments, as it is not always observed. 82
Another protein-related application of TERS is to characterize the glycosylation status of individual glycoproteins and their secondary structures. 83, 84 For example, TERS was successfully applied, in combination with carefully designed multivariate data analysis methods, to quantify the proportion of glycosylated protein in mixtures of native and glycosylated forms of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease. 84
In the past few years, the Schultz group has performed a series of systematic studies to characterize the specificity of protein-ligand interactions. 85–90 In these studies, the TERS signal from the binding site of a protein can be selectively obtained by controlling the plasmonic interactions between the TERS tip and ligand-functionalized nanoparticles. Recently, the plasmonic coupling between a gold nanotip and RGD peptide-functionalized nanoparticles, which bind to specific integrin receptors, were exploited to produce enhanced Raman signals that differentiated between structurally similar integrin subtypes (i.e. α5β1 and αvβ3) in intact cancer cell membranes (Figure 2). 89 In addition, since the measured TERS signal is highly dependent on the ligand-receptor binding conformation, perspectives about binding specificities can be obtained by analyzing the variance in TERS spectra for different ligands binding with the same receptor. 90
2.2.2.3. Cells
TERS is a very useful tool for nanoscale chemical analysis on the surfaces of viruses, bacteria and cells. Popp and co-workers demonstrated TERS in combination with chemometric methods to discriminate a pair of pathogenic viruses. Based on the compositional differences in protein and lipid components the viruses were classified with an accuracy of 91%. 91 Hermelink et al. reported a successful strategy to analyze the morphology and chemical composition of single virus particles by correlated transmission electron microscopy and TERS. 92 Rusciano et al. realized nanoscale chemical imaging of a single bacterial spore, localizing proteins and carbohydrates on the surface through principal component analysis of the TERS spectra. 93 Most recently, TERS was successfully used for nanoscale chemical mapping of newly-synthesized phospholipid molecules from sections of mammalian cells. 94 Topically applied liposomal phospholipid migration was into human stratum corneum was also tracked with TERS. 95
Though the application of TERS in life sciences has seen a rapid increase in recent years, additional improvements are needed to fully realize its potentials. It remains challenging to obtain TERS in liquid environments, although this is an area that is progressing (see below). Another necessary improvement is to further increase the sensitivity and therefore improves the imaging speed in order to monitor dynamic biological processes.
2.2.3. TERS in Liquids
The application of TERS in a liquid environment is challenging due to limitations like tip contamination and degradation, laser focusing, and SPM feedback. However, the use of TERS in liquid is still of great interest as it enables the investigation of biological samples in their native states. Recently, several research groups have reported TERS measurements in liquids. 96–102 Unlike the usual strategy that applies a layer of coating to prolong the stability of the tip, 96, 97 an interesting approach was reported in a recent AFM-TERS study in which probe molecules were conjugated on the TERS tip to map the local pH in an aqueous solution. 98 Other solution properties could be investigated using this approach just by modifying the TERS tip with different probe molecules.
STM-TERS also has been implemented in liquids. In 2015, the Ren group reported the first electrochemical TERS (EC-TERS) results by integrating a commercial STM system with a home-built confocal Raman microscope using a horizontal illumination approach. 99 Within weeks, the Van Duyne group reported AFM based EC-TERS to probe redox reactions Nile Blue molecules. 100 A recent study demonstrated the feasibility of TERS in a top illumination/collection configuration for imaging of opaque samples covered by a thin layer of organic solvent. 101 Sabanes et al. presented a side-illumination STM-TERS setup to measure a monolayer of thiophenol on gold in water. 102
Though there is increasing number of publications applying TERS in liquids using different illumination configurations (e.g. top-, bottom-, side-illuminations), it remains experimentally challenging for imaging.
2.2.4. Other Applications
A novel application of TERS is to map the catalytic activities of surfaces and nanostructures with nanoscale spatial resolution. The Roy group demonstrated the chemical imaging of photocatalytic oxidation of p-mercaptoaniline to p,p′-dimercaptoazobenzene (DMAB) using AFM-TERS. 103 In the study, TERS differentiated between catalytically-active and inactive particles with 20 nm spatial resolution, as shown in Figure 3. Later, the Ren group spatially resolved the site-specific electronic and catalytic properties of a Pd/Au (111) bimetallic surface with 3 nm resolution. 104 These studies may pave the way for a TERS routine to investigate heterogeneous catalysis at the nanoscale, and lead to spectroscopic imaging of individual catalytic sites.
TERS presents unique advantages for probing single molecule dynamics under ultrahigh vacuum condition. Using UHV-TERS at low temperature, Tallarida et al. observed the unique signature of single molecule isomerization in the form of anti-correlated flip-flops between cis and trans isomers. 105 Van Duyne and co-workers observed molecular orientations in a dynamic two-phase system at room temperature using UHV-TERS and STM, which were aided by time-dependent density functional theory simulations. 106 Interestingly, TERS provides complementary chemical information about PPDI molecules on areas where no meaningful STM topographic information can be obtained (Figure 4).
Recently, El-Khoury and co-workers have reported an interesting application of TERS to map the local electric fields. 107, 108 By monitoring the plasmonic modes of strategically selected molecular reporters coated on an Ag (or Au) AFM tip, they were able to image plasmon-enhanced electric fields localized at nanometric features on a silver substrate.
3. IR s-SNOM
IR s-SNOM measures the scattered light from a sharp metallic AFM tip operating in tapping mode at the sample surface. In s-SNOM, the amplitude and phase of the detected signal is dependent on the tip-mediated light-sample interaction, and the signal is enhanced when the incident IR excitation matches vibrational modes in the sample. The spatial resolution of s-SNOM imaging is typically dependent on the radius of the AFM tip, which is usually ~20 nm. Since s-SNOM does not detect the light absorption like the conventional IR spectroscopy, but rather detects the scattered light, which is dependent on the local refractive index of the sample and the tip, the measured s-SNOM spectra may not correspond to the far-field IR absorption spectra, which makes chemical identification challenging. As a result, mathematic models are commonly needed to interpret the measured s-SNOM spectra. 109–113 In addition, interferometric techniques and phase-sensitive lock-in detection are required in s-SNOM to distinguish the near-field signal from the far-field scattering background. Comprehensive theories and instrumental details of s-SNOM can be found in previous review articles. 114, 115 Despite the complex experimental setups, s-SNOM has been applied to characterize various samples due to its nanoscale spatial resolution (referred as nano-FTIR or IR nanospectroscopy). Here we review the most recent advances and applications of s-SNOM for spectroscopic imaging.
3.1. Technical Advances of s-SNOM
High brilliance and broadly tunable IR sources are needed for spectroscopic s-SNOM measurements. Quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) have been widely applied for IR s-SNOM because their high spectral irradiance, and their narrow tuning ranges (few hundreds of wavenumbers) are suitable for acquiring s-SNOM spectra and maps at vibrational modes of interest. 110, 113, 116, 117 Recently, Hillenbrand and co-workers used a tunable bandwidth-limited laser continuum to achieve near-field infrared nanoscopy covering a spectral range from 1000–1900 cm−1, by recording and stitching together multiple bandwidth-limited spectra (Figure 5). 118 Broader spectral ranges have also been achieved using a thermal emitter as a light source; however, the incoherent nature of the radiation and the associated low spectral irradiance is perceived as a limitation. 119 Lahneman et al. introduced a high temperature plasma light source that is both broadband and more brilliant in the infrared spectral region than conventional thermal light sources. 120 This plasma source was used to measure the near-field IR spectra of phonon resonances of SiO2 and SrTiO3. Very recently, s-SNOM was combined with IR synchrotron radiation, termed as synchrotron IR nanospectroscopy, which enables broadband molecular and phonon vibrational spectroscopic imaging with rapid spectral acquisition over the full mid-infrared (500–5000 cm−1) region with nanoscale spatial resolution. 121–124
As mentioned above, complex interferometric techniques are necessary in s-SNOM setup to amplify the near-field signal and determine its phase with respect to a known reference field. Hillenbrand and co-workers have reported a method for rapidly acquiring background-free, high-resolution, near-field spectra that combines the well-established pseudo-heterodyne detection technique with a wavelength-swept QCL. 116 They modified the commonly used pseudo-heterodyne detection scheme by operating the interferometer in the white light position, which was found to be critical for measurement repeatability. The Raschke group has presented a simplified symmetric geometry using the spatially coherent background scattered light from within the confocal sample volume as a reference field for signal amplification in both self-homodyne and self-heterodyne interferometry. 110 The simplified setup exhibited increased stability due to reduced sensitivity to fluctuations and drift, leading to shorter measurement times and more robust data collection. Wang et al. reported a near-field signal extraction method that enables the use of low-repetition-rate pulsed light sources, which are usually incompatible with the lock-in detection mechanism that is required for s-SNOM. 117 This method correlates scattering signals from the pulses with the mechanical phases of the oscillating s-SNOM probe to obtain the near-field signal, and enables s-SNOM with high peak-powers that facilitate nanoscale spectroscopic investigations.
Recently, Kajihara and co-workers reported a new setup called passive s-SNOM, in which thermally excited fields are detected without an external light source. 125, 126 They demonstrated the capability of passive s-SNOM by measuring thermally excited surface evanescent waves on Au/SiO2 gratings in the long-wavelength infrared region. 126 Other technical advances have focused on incorporating s-SNOM with other imaging modalities to realize correlative multimodal imaging. Several research groups have incorporated s-SNOM with AFM-based force spectroscopy for correlated infrared nanospectroscopic and nanomechanical imaging of various materials such as polymers, biomolecules, and nanomaterials. 127–129 In addition, the combination of ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy with s-SNOM has been demonstrated to achieve spatiotemporal spectroscopic imaging with nanometer spatial resolution and femtosecond temporal resolution. 130–133
3.2. Applications of s-SNOM
3.2.1. s-SNOM in Materials Science
Polaritons in two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals materials exhibit hyperbolic dispersion and strong field confinement, which makes them highly attractive for applications including optical nanofocusing, sensing and control of spontaneous emission. s-SNOM has been heavily applied to probe these surface polaritons in layered 2D materials such as graphene, and graphene-like hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). 111, 112, 134–137 A recent work by Basov and co-workers presented the direct experimental access to the hyperbolic phonon polaritons that are effectively modulated in a graphene/hBN heterostructure, using s-SNOM based nano-IR spectroscopy and imaging. 134 Almost simultaneously, Deneke and co-workers investigated graphene/hBN plasmon–phonon coupling and plasmon delocalization, showing that broadband IR s-SNOM is able to distinguish between the graphene/hBN and the graphene/SiO2 heterostructure as well as differentiate between graphene stacks with different numbers of layers. 135 The Wang group at Berkeley has imaged phonon polaritons in hBN crystals 111 and, more recently, investigated the edge-reflection of two-dimensional surface polaritons in graphene sandwiched in hBN flakes, 136 using amplitude- and phase-resolved s-SNOM imaging. Very recently, Bezares et al. applied s-SNOM to study highly-doped graphene and interestingly observed strong coupling between intrinsic graphene phonons and plasmons. 138 Other than the 2D materials, one-dimensional boron nitride nanotubes have also been studied by correlative near-field nanomechanical and nano-IR spectroscopic measurements. 129 Using multimodal characterization, the IR signatures and mechanical responses of structural defects in individual boron nitride nanotubes have been correlated.
A number of other materials have also been characterized by s-SNOM. Levratovsky and Gross reported nanoscale chemical mapping of the catalytic reactivity of OH-functionalized N-heterocyclic carbene molecules on platinum nanoparticles. 139 Johnson and Bohmler used s-SNOM to monitor the atmospheric corrosion of a copper surface, and spectroscopically determined different corrosion products and their spatial distribution with 20 nm resolution. 140 Ayache et al. used IR s-SNOM to study the chemical composition of the solid electrolyte interphase on Li-ion negative electrodes at the length scale of its basic building blocks, revealing significant chemical variation tied to specific topographic features. 141 Using nano-IR spectroscopic techniques based on s-SNOM and AFM-IR, Khanikaev et al. visualized the origin of circular dichroism in two-dimensional metamaterials, showing it is related to non-radiative dissipation of the constituent metamolecules that occurs on the nanoscale. 142
Recently, the Raschke group presented an interesting application of IR s-SNOM for optical nano-crystallography and nano-imaging. Structural heterogeneity of polycrystalline perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA), including orientation distributions and correlation across domain boundaries and morphological features, was characterized using IR vibrational nano-crystallography (Figure 6). 143 Liu et al. have applied s-SNOM to study a variety of vanadium dioxide (VO2) crystalline forms, including bulk single crystals and oriented thin films, and showed that epitaxial strain in VO2 thin films leads to intermediate electronic and lattice states that are intrinsically different from those found in bulk. 144 On a spatially heterogeneous polytetrafluoroethylene molecular model system, Atkin et al. demonstrated femtosecond s-SNOM to observe ultrafast coherent dynamics of molecular subpopulations that define the properties of many functional materials. 145
3.2.2. s-SNOM in Life Science
IR-based s-SNOM has also recently been applied for nanoscale chemical imaging of biological samples. Using probe-based s-SNOM in conjunction with tunable QCL diode lasers, Phillips and co-workers obtained chemical maps inside single cells with spatial resolution 1000x better than the diffraction limit. 146 Qin et al. investigated the electron irradiation-regulated structural transitions of silk firoin protein with molecular level resolution by monitoring the IR signal of amide I and II bands using both AFM-IR and s-SNOM. 147 These amide bands contain information about protein secondary structures and are also used for nanoimaging of proteins and their structural changes in other biological samples, such as the distribution of melanin granules in human hair, 118 amyloid-like ribbons of amelogenins in enamel mineralization, 148 and collagen fibrils in damaged human tendons. 149
To date, most s-SNOM applications of biological systems have been performed on dried samples. It is desirable, though challenging, to demonstrate spectroscopic s-SNOM in biologically relevant solutions. Recently, Khatib et al. reported a graphene-based liquid cell platform for near-field IR nanospectroscopy of the tobaccomosaic virus (TMV) in aqueous environments. 150 In this work, large-area graphene acts as an impermeable monolayer barrier that allows for nano-IR inspection of underlying molecular materials in the liquid, while the AFM probe is operated in air. Using this configuration, the researchers successfully resolve individual virus particles by measuring the amide bands of TMV. This work demonstrated the potential of s-SNOM for nano-IR investigation in aqueous solutions, however, the ultrathin graphene liquid cells used is not easy to implement and warrant further studies to apply s-SNOM in liquid.
4. AFM-IR
AFM-IR, also known as photo-thermal induced resonance (PTIR), is a novel technique that allows IR spectroscopic imaging with a spatial resolution far beyond the diffraction-limited IR micro-spectroscopy. A typical AFM-IR setup consists of a pulsed wavelength-tunable light source for sample irradiation and an AFM tip in contact with the sample to detect the local thermal expansion resulting from the absorption of light (Figure 7). AFM-IR spectra correlate very well with conventional FTIR spectra, making them simple to apply for chemical analysis. The first AFM-IR experiment was demonstrated by the Dazzi group in 2005. 151 The technique has evolved over the past decade and a variety of applications have been reported. More details about the technique can be found in previous review articles. 115, 152 Here we review the most recent advances and applications of AFM-IR.
4.1. Technical Advances of AFM-IR
In early AFM-IR experiments, the optical parametric oscillator (OPO) tunable laser source with relatively low repetition rate (1 kHz) was used, which required the cantilever oscillation to ring down at its natural resonance frequencies after each laser pulse. Recently, Belkin and co-workers replaced the OPO laser source with a variable repetition rate QCL, and presented a dramatic improvement in the AFM-IR signal. 153 They tuned the QCL repetition rate to match AFM cantilever’s contact resonance frequency, which leads to a large increase in the oscillation amplitude and changes the ring-down oscillation to a continuous oscillation. This technique is now recognized as resonance enhanced AFM-IR (RE-AFM-IR), and significantly improves the sensitivity compared to the original AFM-IR technique. Using RE-AFM-IR, several research groups have demonstrated nanoscale IR imaging of polymers 153–156 and biomembranes 157–159 with sensitivity down to monolayers. Benefitting from the improved sensitivity, time-resolved RE-AFM-IR experiments, monitoring the structural changes in poly-L-lysine, have been performed with a temporal resolution of 15 s per spectrum over a spectral range of more than 100 cm−1. 155 It should be noted that the contact resonance of the AFM cantilever is dependent on the properties of materials in the sample. When performing an imaging experiment on a heterogeneous sample, it is complicated to match the contact resonance and the excitation frequency for all pixels in an image. Lendl and co-workers demonstrated how an incorrect excitation frequency in RE-AFM-IR experiments results in imaging artifacts arising from changes in the contact resonance frequency instead of the chemical composition. 160 To solve this, Lendl et al. proposed a controller design that continuously tracks and readjusts the excitation frequency to match the AFM resonance frequency. Very recently, Belkin and co-workers reported RE-AFM-IR when the sample and the scanning probe are completely immersed in water. 156 This technique has successfully image polymer samples with 25-nm spatial resolution in the biologically relevant amide spectral regions.
To take full advantages of the chemical analysis capability of AFM-IR, bright IR sources with wide spectral range are preferred. Recently, Cinque and co-workers reported the first use of infrared synchrotron radiation (IR-SR) as a broadband source for RE-AFM-IR. 161 Taking advantage of the bright and broadband nature of IR-SR, a spectrum was collected from the near-IR up to the far-IR range within 15 minutes. Further improvements in imaging speed are needed in order to apply IR-SR AFM-IR for collecting images of hundreds or more pixels. In another study, Centrone et al. have presented the extension of AFM-IR spectral range in the visible and Near IR range, by incorporating three OPO lasers with different spectral ranges into a commercial AFM-IR setup. 162 They successfully demonstrated the acquisition of absorption spectra and maps over wavelengths from 500 nm to 16.0 μm with approximately 20-nm spatial resolution independent of excitation wavelength.
AFM-IR has also been integrated with other imaging modalities to obtain complementary information about the sample. Lo et al. combined AFM-IR with contact resonance AFM to perform nanoscale chemical-mechanical characterization of low-k dielectrics. 163 Vitry et al. used AFM-IR together with mode synthesizing AFM for three-dimensional chemical imaging of lipid production in bacteria with sub-50 nm spatial resolution. 164 Latour et al. correlated AFM-IR with second harmonic generation to monitor collagen denaturation to gelatin. 165
Recently, Katzenmeyer et al. introduced scanning thermal infrared microscopy (STIRM), which can obtain IR spectra and maps with nanoscale spatial resolution. 166 By directly measuring the temperature change caused by IR light absorption at the sample, STIRM can complement the chemical imaging capability of AFM-IR for materials with a small thermal expansion coefficient. Wang et al. developed peak force infrared (PFIR) microscopy, which enables spatial imaging of infrared absorption responses with a spatial resolution of ~10 nm, and simultaneous nanoscale mapping of mechanical properties. 167 PFIR operates in the peak force tapping mode of AFM, which is robust on various rough and sticky sample surfaces that are not suitable for the contact mode used in typical AFM-IR measurements.
4.2. Applications of AFM-IR
4.2.1. AFM-IR in Polymer Sciences
AFM-IR has been heavily applied in characterizing polymers. It provides the extraordinary capability to characterize the chemical identities, map the nanoscale compositional domains, and even track the dynamic changes of various polymeric materials.
One popular application of AFM-IR is to analyze the composition and distribution of components in composite polymeric materials. Brown and Bhushan reported a method for preparing leophobic polymer-nanoparticle composite nanomaterials. 168 In their work, AFM-IR was used to analyze the distribution of polycarbonate and confirm that the nanoparticle agglomerates are embedded in the polymer surface. Tang et al. applied AFM-IR to quantitatively determine the compositions of different phase domains in high-impact polypropylene (HIPP). 169 Using calibration spectra generated by conventional FTIR, they were able to perform quantitative analysis of the chemical composition of nanoscopic domains in HIPP samples (Figure 7). Kelchtermans et al. presented the characterization of a polyethylene-polyamide multilayer film using AFM-IR, demonstrating its capability to obtain nanoscale spectroscopic, thermal and mechanical property differences, in the tie layers located between the individual polyethylene and polyamide layers of a multilayer cling film of initially unknown structure. 170 AFM-IR has also been applied to analyze the chemical structures of composite materials, such as hybrid rubbers composed of polyamide and hydrogenated acrylonitrile butadiene, 171 polycaprolacton-chitosan nonwovens, 172 and paclitaxel/chitosan co-assembled core-shell nanofibers. 173
The Remita group at University of Paris-Sud reported novel synthesis methods for different conducting polymers such as poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) 174, 175 and poly(diphenylbutadiyne), 176, 177 which have various potential applications in energy conversion and storage. In these studies, AFM-IR characterized the synthesized polymeric nanostructures, as it allows chemical identification of the polymer nanostructures simultaneously with morphological characterization. A series of impressive AFM-IR studies have been reported by Rabolt and co-workers, in which they investigated the structure of electronspun fibers made of Poly[(R)-3- hydroxybutyrate-co-(R)-3-hydroxyhexanoate] (PHBHx). 178, 179 AFM-IR spectra and imaging of single nanofibers revealed a heterogeneous core-shell spatial distribution of two crystalline polymorphs of PHBHx, the thermodynamically stable α-form and the metastable β-form (Figure 8). 179
AFM-IR has also been used to investigate the miscibility of different drug-polymer blends and characterize the size and compositions of specific domains. 180, 181 For example, Li and Taylor investigated the miscibility behavior of telaprevir, a poorly water-soluble drug, with three different polymers, HPMC, HPMCAS, and PVPVA, at different drug to polymer ratios where phase separation takes place. 181 AFM-IR images showed clear contrast between the polymer-rich continuous domains and the drug-rich discrete domains ranging below 50 nm to a few hundred nanometers. The direct visualization of the structure and chemical composition of phases provides valuable insights in the miscibility of pharmaceutical components.
Using AFM-IR, it is possible to track dynamic compositional changes in materials. In the past few years, Morsch and co-workers have made tremendous progress unraveling the degradation mechanism of intact organic coatings. 182–186 Using AFM-IR, the researchers mapped local water uptake in epoxy-phenolic coatings under different conditions with nanoscale lateral resolution, 182–184 as well as correlated the internal cross-linking density to the appearance of nanoscale chemical heterogeneities in epoxy networks. 182, 185, 186 In a recent study, Morsch et al. observed the direct evidence for locally induced photocatalytic degradation in the vicinity of anatase titanium white pigments at the surface of linseed oil paints. 187 Other related studies include the characterization of collagen degradation in ancient parchments using AFM-IR in combination with nonlinear optical microscopy. 165
4.2.2. AFM-IR in Life Sciences
AFM-IR has been widely applied for chemical imaging of subcellular heterogeneity in single cells and bacteria with a typical spatial resolution of 50–100 nm, by monitoring the specific IR absorption bands of cellular components such as proteins and lipids. 157, 164, 188–190 For example, Giliberti et al. have presented the application of AFM-IR to study the protein clustering in chemically stressed HeLa cells using the amide-I vibrational mode at 1660 cm−1. 190 Interestingly, Gruszecki et al. reported the AFM-IR imaging of protein-containing lipid membranes with a resolution better than 20 nm. 191 The observed resolution was attributed partially to the different mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of the lipid and protein components (Figure 9). A few recent studies have demonstrated the capability of AFM-IR to chemically monitor biological processes within the cells. The Dazzi group used AFM-IR to investigate the production of poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) with in single bacteria. 192 By monitoring the local changes in the IR signal, they estimated the degree of crystallinity for native PHB within bacteria without any extraction and purification steps. Wang et al. correlated AFM-IR and nanoindentation measurements to characterize the chemical and mechanical properties of the cell wall in wood interacting with phenol-formaldehyde resin. 193 In an AFM-IR study of bacteria on a polymer film, Barlow et al. demonstrated that the chemical sensitivity of AFM-IR can be affected by the sample materials, and corrections are required for quantitative analyses. 194
Another popular application of AFM-IR in life science is to study the secondary structures of proteins and peptides, 147, 195–197 as well as their aggregates, namely amyloid fibrils associated with neurodegenerative disease like Huntingtons and Alzheimers. 198–201 Khanal et al. used AFM-IR to study the interactions between proteins and nanoparticles. 195 Measuring the amide I and amide II absorption bands provides conformational information of the proteins during protein-particle interactions, suggesting implications for nanomaterial toxicity in biological environments. Paluszkiewicz et al. investigated cataract development in the human lens with AFM-IR, in which disease development was associated with the secondary structure of proteins. 196 Ruggeri et al. applied AFM-IR to study the misfolding and aggregation of the Josephin domain of ataxin-3, implicated in spinocerebellar ataxia-3. 198 Taking advantages of the high chemical sensitivity and spatial resolution of AFM-IR, they monitored the conversion of monomers into amyloid β-sheet aggregates and linked the stiffness of amyloid structures to their β-sheet content at molecular level. In another recent work, the same research group studied the fibril aggregates of the first exon of the Huntington protein (Exon1), correlating morphological and mechanical properties of Exon1 aggregates with their structural organization at the single molecule and nanometer scale. 199 These recent reports demonstrate the usefulness of AFM-IR to investigate the structural bases of protein fibrillization and misfolding, providing a deeper understanding of protein aggregation.
4.2.3. Other AFM-IR applications
In addition to the most popular applications in polymer and life sciences, AFM-IR has seen novel applications in other areas recently. For example, AFM-IR has been applied to characterize nanoscale chemical structures of low-k dielectrics. 163, 202 A series of collaborative studies by the Huang group at University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Centrone group at National Institute of Standards and Technology used AFM-IR to investigate the compositional changes of perovskite solar cells during various processes. 203–206 Furhermore, the Centrone group has utilized AFM-IR to map the distribution and intensity of surface-enhanced infrared absorption hot-spots in plasmonic resonators. 207–209
5. PiFM
PiFM is an emerging technique that enables spectroscopic imaging of materials with nanoscale resolution. Theoretical studies report that PiFM probes the dipole-dipole interaction forces between a metallic AFM tip and the induced dipoles in the sample. The induced dipole in the sample is dependent on the photoinduced polarization in the sample, and therefore provides spectroscopic constrast. 210, 211 In addition, since the photoinduced forces are highly localized at the tip-sample interface, PiFM typically exhibits a spatial resolution around ~10 nm. 212 PiFM incorporates an AFM in noncontact/tapping mode, where the feedback is established at one mechanical resonance of the cantilever (f0), and the high-contrast image is detected at another mechanical resonance (f1) with a pulsed excitation laser modulated at a frequency equal to the difference between these two resonances (fm = f1 − f0). 213, 214 This heterodyne detection is reported to improve imaging contrast, as compared to direct detection at the modulation frequency (fm), and effectively avoid artifacts caused by photothermal effects. 215 Figure 10 shows a general schematic of PiFM experimental setup. More theoretical details and early experiments of PiFM are summarized in previous reports. 212, 214 In this section, we review the most recent advances and applications of PiFM.
Depending on the optical excitation frequencies (from visible to mid-IR), PiFM can be used to image electronic or vibrational transitions in a sample. Recently, a number of studies have been carried out to probe different electronic properties via visible and near-IR excitations. 216–219 Jahng et al. reported the nanoscale visualization of the electric field distributions associated with propagating surface-plasmon polariton modes on flat gold surfaces, based on the detection of the photoinduced gradient force exerted by the evanescent field onto a sharp and polarizable tip. 216 Ambrosio and co-workers used PiFM to image the local refractive index contrast of a sample specifically designed to unambiguously decouple morphology from optical response with resolution better than 10 nm. 217 Huang et al. demonstrated PiFM can map the spatial electric field distributions of tightly focused laser beams with linear, radial and azimuthal polarizations by measuring the optical force between a gold coated AFM probe and its image dipole on a glass substrate. 218 In another study, Tumkur and co-workers applied PiFM to characterize heterogeneities of plasmonic nanostructures by measuring the near-field optical forces, and suggested that the enhancement of the detected forces follows the expected plasmonic field enhancements with strong polarization sensitivity. 219
By moving the excitation wavelength to mid-IR range, PiFM can provide high-contrast images of different vibrational modes, which can be used to determine chemical species in a sample. Recently, Nowak et al. presented a study using PiFM to spatially map nanoscale patterns of individual chemical components of two different types of self-assembled block copolymer films, including PS-b-P2VP polymer (Figure 10). 220 In another example, hyperspectral PiFM was applied to map the optical patterns of P3HT films with sub-10 nm spatial resolution. 221
PiFM has also been applied to probe nonlinear optical processes. Jahng et al. demonstrated the feasibility of probing the ultrafast nonlinear optical response of nanoscopic materials in a non-optical manner by combining PiFM with ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy. 222 The time-resolved PiFM suppresses the impact of the optical background that is intrinsic to conventional optical pump-probe techniques. Nonlinear vibrational characterization has also been probed with PiFM. Tamma et al. demonstrated the stimulated Raman spectroscopy and nanoscopy of molecules excited and measured only using near-field photoinduced forces without the need for far-field optical spectroscopic detection. 223, 224 The detected Raman spectra were found to agree well with references. These experiments demonstrate the potential of PiFM to probe nonlinear electronic and vibrational transitions with the sensitivity down to single molecule.
Recently, Kim et al. reported the use of quartz tuning fork (QTF) as a probe for multi-frequency PiFM, 225 instead of the commonly used cantilever tip, which is prone to the unwanted jump-to-contact problem under ambient conditions. In this report, distinct eigenmodes of a QTF system were fully characterized by simulations and experiments. Furthermore, by using the QTF in different configurations, the researchers demonstrated the usefulness of QTF to independently register the photoinduced forces in the axial (tapping) direction as well as in the lateral (shear force) direction, which is not easily attained with a cantilevered tip.
6. Summary and Outlook
The rapid development of nanoscale spectroscopic imaging has been impressive in recent years. The development and incorporation of new hardware has produced new techniques, and the competition between commercial companies appears to be producing instruments with increasing accessibility for non-experts. Today it is common for the instrument manufacturers to set-up demonstrations at conference exhibitions, and travel with functioning instruments. The current challenge appears to be choosing which flavor of nano-spectroscopic imaging will address a specific research problem. There are clearly certain samples that are exemplars for each technique, such as carbon nanotubes and 2D materials in TERS or phase separated polymer blends for AFM-IR.
The ability to investigate samples in solutions remains experimentally challenging and will be an area to watch in the future. TERS has benefitted from the longest development time; however the rapid growth of infrared-based approaches cannot be ignored. It appears that Raman-based detection and the ability to use visible light for excitation may benefit TERS and possibly PiFM; however, the development of QCLs and tunable infrared lasers may overcome the power attenuation in aqueous environments.
TERS has demonstrated sub-nanometer spatial resolution and recent demonstrations in solution appear promising; however, there are still unresolved questions about mode selectivity that may limit the utility in certain applications that might be better addressed by the emerging methods.
Nonetheless, the ability to probe and image single molecules and address how the spatial context of the molecule affect the chemical behavior appears to be in the realm of the doable. It is expected that the field will see an increase in publications using nanoscale spectroscopic imaging in the coming years.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, award R01GM109988; and the National Science Foundation award CHE-1507287.
Biographies
Lifu Xiao received his Ph.D. in Biological Engineering from Utah State University in 2015. His dissertation research focused on developing spectroscopic and microscopic methods for sensing and imaging of mammalian cells and cell membrane receptors. He is currently a postdoctoral researcher in Professor Schultz’s lab at University of Notre Dame, where his current research focuses on the investigation of protein-ligand interaction using surface- and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in combination with chemometric methods.
Zachary D. Schultz earned is B.S. degree from the Ohio State University in 2000 and Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2005. Upon completing his Ph.D., he performed postdoctoral research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (USA) and National Institutes of Health. Dr. Schultz began his independent career as an assistant professor of chemistry and biochemistry at the University of Notre Dame in 2009, and was promoted with tenure to associate professor in 2015. Prof. Schultz holds a concurrent appointment in the department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Notre Dame. Prof. Schultz’s research at Notre Dame has focused on developing innovative approaches utilizing nanostructures for near field imaging and ultrasensitive label-free spectroscopic detection. Ultimately, the Schultz lab wants to push the limits of sensitivity and spatial resolution of label-free detection for applications in biological and interfacial systems.
References
- 1.Abraham JL, Etz ES. Science. 1979;206:716–718. doi: 10.1126/science.493979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.SWEEDLER J. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 1993;24:59–98. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lewis EN, Treado PJ, Reeder RC, Story GM, Dowrey AE, Marcott C, Levin IW. Anal Chem. 1995;67:3377–3381. doi: 10.1021/ac00115a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Levin IW, Bhargava R. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2005;56:429–474. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.56.092503.141205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ogunleke A, Bobroff V, Chen H, Rowlette J, Delugin M, Recur B, Hwu Y, Petibois C. Trac-Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2017;89:190–196. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Antonio KA, Schultz ZD. Anal Chem. 2014;86:30–46. doi: 10.1021/ac403640f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cucci C, Delaney JK, Picollo M. Acc Chem Res. 2016;49:2070–2079. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lopez-Lorente AI, Mizaikoff B. Trac-Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2016;84:97–106. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ewing AV, Kazarian SG. Analyst. 2017;142:257–272. doi: 10.1039/c6an02244h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Blasiak B, Londergan CH, Webb LJ, Cho M. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50:968–976. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wei L, Chen Z, Shi L, Long R, Anzalone AV, Zhang L, Hu F, Yuste R, Cornish VW, Min W. Nature. 2017;544:465–470. doi: 10.1038/nature22051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lane LA, Qian X, Nie S. Chem Rev. 2015;115:10489–10529. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fabris L. Chemnanomat. 2016;2:249–258. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Anderson M. Appl Phys Lett. 2000;76:3130–3132. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hayazawa N, Inouye Y, Sekkat Z, Kawata S. Opt Commun. 2000;183:333–336. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pettinger B, Picardi G, Schuster R, Ertl G. Electrochemistry. 2000;68:942–949. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stockle R, Suh Y, Deckert V, Zenobi R. Chem Phys Lett. 2000;318:131–136. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang Z, Sheng S, Wang R, Sun M. Anal Chem. 2016;88:9328–9346. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Verma P. Chem Rev. 2017;117:6447–6466. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shi X, Coca-Lopez N, Janik J, Hartschuh A. Chem Rev. 2017 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Deckert-Gaudig T, Taguchi A, Kawata S, Deckert V. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46:4077–4110. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00209b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang X, Huang SC, Huang TX, Su HS, Zhong JH, Zeng ZC, Li MH, Ren B. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46:4020–4041. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00206h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li M, Lv R, Huang S, Dai Y, Zeng Z, Wang L, Ren B. J Raman Spectrosc. 2016;47:808–812. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huh TW, Han G, Ban WJ, Ahn H. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2017;18:221–226. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Martina M, Fleischer M, Burkhardt CJ. Microelectron Eng. 2017;171:31–36. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kharintsev S, Alekseev A, Loos J. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2017;171:139–143. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2016.07.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee C, Kim ST, Jeong BG, Yun SJ, Song YJ, Lee YH, Park DJ, Jeong MS. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40810. doi: 10.1038/srep40810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Leiterer C, Deckert-Gaudig T, Singh P, Wirth J, Deckert V, Fritzsche W. Electrophoresis. 2015;36:1142–1148. doi: 10.1002/elps.201400530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim W, Kim N, Lee E, Kim D, Hwan Kim Z, Won Park J. Analyst. 2016;141:5066–5070. doi: 10.1039/c6an00035e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zito G, Rusciano G, Vecchione A, Pesce G, Di Girolamo R, Malafronte A, Sasso A. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31113. doi: 10.1038/srep31113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang LK, Huang TX, Zeng ZC, Li MH, Wang X, Yang FZ, Ren B. Nanoscale. 2015;7:18225–18231. doi: 10.1039/c5nr04263a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ma X, Gruesser M, Schuster R. Appl Phys Lett. 2015;106:241103. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bakhti S, Destouches N, Hubert C, Reynaud S, Vocanson F, Ondarcuhu T, Epicier T. Nanoscale. 2016;8:7496–7500. doi: 10.1039/c5nr08310a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Taguchi A, Yu J, Verma P, Kawata S. Nanoscale. 2015;7:17424–17433. doi: 10.1039/c5nr05022g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Maouli I, Taguchi A, Saito Y, Kawata S, Verma P. Appl Phys Express. 2015;8:032401. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vasconcelos TL, Archanjo BS, Fragneaud B, Oliveira BS, Riikonen J, Li C, Ribeiro DS, Rabelo C, Rodrigues WN, Jorio A, Achete CA, Cancado LG. ACS Nano. 2015;9:6297–6304. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kitahama Y, Uemura S, Katayama R, Suzuki T, Itoh T, Ozaki Y. Appl Phys Lett. 2017;110:233104. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Opilik L, Dogan U, Szczerbinski J, Zenobi R. Appl Phys Lett. 2015;107:091109. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kumar N, Spencer SJ, Imbraguglio D, Rossi AM, Wain AJ, Weckhuysen BM, Roy D. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:13710–13716. doi: 10.1039/c6cp01641c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Opilik L, Dogan U, Li C, Stephanidis B, Li J, Zenobi R. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:20828–20832. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Deckert V, Deckert-Gaudig T, Diegel M, Goetz I, Langelueddecke L, Schneidewind H, Sharma G, Singh P, Singh P, Trautmann S, Zeisberger M, Zhang Z. Farad Discuss. 2015;177:9–20. doi: 10.1039/c5fd90014j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jiang S, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Hu C, Liao M, Luo Y, Yang J, Dong Z, Hou JG. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10:865–869. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liao M, Jiang S, Hu C, Zhang R, Kuang Y, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Dong Z. Nano Lett. 2016;16:4040–4046. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chiang N, Chen X, Goubert G, Chulhai DV, Chen X, Pozzi EA, Jiang N, Hersam MC, Seideman T, Jensen L, Van Duyne RP. Nano Lett. 2016;16:7774–7778. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Deckert-Gaudig T, Kurouski D, Hedegaard MAB, Singh P, Lednev IK, Deckert V. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33575. doi: 10.1038/srep33575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang R, Zhang X, Wang H, Zhang Y, Jiang S, Hu C, Zhang Y, Luo Y, Dong Z. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:5561–5564. doi: 10.1002/anie.201702263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pozzi EK, Goubert G, Chiang N, Jiang N, Chapman CT, McAnally MO, Henry A, Seideman T, Schatz GC, Hersam MC, Van Duyne RP. Chem Rev. 2017;117:4961–4982. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Meng L, Yang Z, Chen J, Sun M. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9240. doi: 10.1038/srep09240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang C, Chen B, Li Z. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:11858–11871. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhang C, Chen B, Li Z. Chin Phys B. 2016;25:095203. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Trautmann S, Aizpurua J, Goetz I, Undisz A, Dellith J, Schneidewind H, Rettenmayr M, Deckert V. Nanoscale. 2017;9:391–401. doi: 10.1039/c6nr07560f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Latorre F, Kupfer S, Bocklitz T, Kinzel D, Trautmann S, Graefe S, Deckert V. Nanoscale. 2016;8:10229–10239. doi: 10.1039/c6nr00093b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu P, Chulhai DV, Jensen L. ACS Nano. 2017;11:5094–5102. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b02058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dresselhaus MS, Jorio A, Hofmann M, Dresselhaus G, Saito R. Nano Lett. 2010;10:751–758. doi: 10.1021/nl904286r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Beams R, Cançado LG, Jorio A, Vamivakas AN, Novotny L. Nanotechnology. 2015;26:175702. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/17/175702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vantasin S, Tanaka Y, Uemura S, Suzuki T, Kutsuma Y, Doujima D, Kaneko T, Ozaki Y. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:28993–28999. doi: 10.1039/c5cp05014f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Iwasaki T, Zelai T, Ye S, Tsuchiya Y, Chong HM, Mizuta H. Carbon. 2017;111:67–73. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pashaee F, Sharifi F, Fanchini G, Lagugné-Labarthet F. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:21315–21322. doi: 10.1039/c4cp05252h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Su W, Kumar N, Dai N, Roy D. Chem Commun(Camb) 2016;52:8227–8230. doi: 10.1039/c6cc01990k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chaunchaiyakul S, Yano T, Khoklang K, Krukowski P, Akai-Kasaya M, Saito A, Kuwahara Y. Carbon. 2016;99:642–648. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hoffmann GG, Bârsan OA, Ven LG, With G. J Raman Spectrosc. 2017;48:191–196. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sheremet E, Rodriguez RD, Agapov AL, Sokolov AP, Hietschold M, Zahn DR. Carbon. 2016;96:588–593. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang X, Zhong J, Zhang M, Liu Z, Wu D, Ren B. Anal Chem. 2015;88:915–921. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Opilik L, Payamyar P, Szczerbiński J, Schütz AP, Servalli M, Hungerland T, Schlüter AD, Zenobi R. ACS Nano. 2015;9:4252–4259. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shao F, Müller V, Zhang Y, Schlüter AD, Zenobi R. Angew Chem. 2017;129:9489–9494. doi: 10.1002/anie.201703800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Su W, Kumar N, Mignuzzi S, Crain J, Roy D. Nanoscale. 2016;8:10564–10569. doi: 10.1039/c5nr07378b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Park K, Khatib O, Kravtsov V, Clark G, Xu X, Raschke MB. Nano Lett. 2016;16:2621–2627. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhang Y, Voronine DV, Qiu S, Sinyukov AM, Hamilton M, Liege Z, Sokolov AV, Zhang Z, Scully MO. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25788. doi: 10.1038/srep25788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rodriguez RD, Sheremet E, Deckert-Gaudig T, Chaneac C, Hietschold M, Deckert V, Zahn DR. Nanoscale. 2015;7:9545–9551. doi: 10.1039/c5nr01277e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Meyer C, Hühn S, Jungbauer M, Merten S, Damaschke B, Samwer K, Moshnyaga V. J Raman Spectrosc. 2017;48:46–52. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lucia A, Cacioppo OA, Iulianella E, Latessa L, Moccia G, Passeri D, Rossi M. Appl Phys Lett. 2017;110:103105. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lin X, Deckert-Gaudig T, Singh P, Siegmann M, Kupfer S, Zhang Z, Gräfe S, Deckert V. 2016 arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.06598. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pashaee F, Tabatabaei M, Caetano FA, Ferguson SS, Lagugné-Labarthet F. Analyst. 2016;141:3251–3258. doi: 10.1039/c6an00350h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Japaridze A, Vobornik D, Lipiec E, Cerreta A, Szczerbinski J, Zenobi R, Dietler G. Macromolecules. 2016;49:643–652. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lipiec E, Japaridze A, Szczerbiński J, Dietler G, Zenobi R. Small. 2016;12:4821–4829. doi: 10.1002/smll.201601711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Deckert-Gaudig T, Deckert V. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39622. doi: 10.1038/srep39622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sereda V, Lednev IK. Appl Spectrosc. 2017;71:118–128. doi: 10.1177/0003702816651890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Krasnoslobodtsev AV, Deckert-Gaudig T, Zhang Y, Deckert V, Lyubchenko YL. Ultramicroscopy. 2016;165:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.VandenAkker CC, Schleeger M, Bruinen AL, Deckert-Gaudig T, Velikov KP, Heeren RMA, Deckert V, Bonn M, Koenderink GH. J Phys Chem B. 2016;120:8809–8817. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b05339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.vandenAkker CC, Deckert-Gaudig T, Schleeger M, Velikov KP, Deckert V, Bonn M, Koenderink GH. Small. 2015;11:4131–4139. doi: 10.1002/smll.201500562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bonhommeau S, Talaga D, Hunel J, Cullin C, Lecomte S. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:1771–1774. doi: 10.1002/anie.201610399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Blum C, Schmid T, Opilik L, Metanis N, Weidmann S, Zenobi R. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:23061–23066. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Davies HS, Singh P, Deckert-Gaudig T, Deckert V, Rousseau K, Ridley CE, Dowd SE, Doig AJ, Pudney PDA, Thornton DJ, Blanch EW. Anal Chem. 2016;88:11609–11615. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Cowcher DP, Deckert-Gaudig T, Brewster VL, Ashton L, Deckert V, Goodacre R. Anal Chem. 2016;88:2105–2112. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Carrier SL, Kownacki CM, Schultz ZD. Chem Commun(Camb) 2011;47:2065–2067. doi: 10.1039/c0cc05059h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Alexander KD, Schultz ZD. Anal Chem. 2012;84:7408–7414. doi: 10.1021/ac301739k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wang H, Schultz ZD. Analyst. 2013;138:3150–3157. doi: 10.1039/c3an36898j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Wang H, Schultz ZD. ChemPhysChem. 2014;15:3944–3949. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201402466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Xiao L, Wang H, Schultz ZD. Anal Chem. 2016;88:6547–6553. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Xiao L, Bailey KA, Wang H, Schultz ZD. Anal Chem. 2017;89:9091–9099. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Olschewski K, Kammer E, Stockel S, Bocklitz T, Deckert-Gaudig T, Zell R, Cialla-May D, Weber K, Deckert V, Popp J. Nanoscale. 2015;7:4545–4552. doi: 10.1039/c4nr07033j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hermelink A, Naumann D, Piesker J, Lasch P, Laue M, Hermann P. Analyst. 2017;142:1342–1349. doi: 10.1039/c6an02151d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rusciano G, Zito G, Isticato R, Sirec T, Ricca E, Bailo E, Sasso A. ACS Nano. 2014;8:12300–12309. doi: 10.1021/nn504595k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kumar N, Drozdz MM, Jiang H, Santos DM, Vaux DJ. Chem Commun(Camb) 2017;53:2451–2454. doi: 10.1039/c6cc10226c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Ashtikar M, Langelüddecke L, Fahr A, Deckert V. BBA-GEN SUBJECTS. 2017;1861:2630–2639. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Schmid T, Yeo B, Leong G, Stadler J, Zenobi R. J Raman Spectrosc. 2009;40:1392–1399. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Nakata A, Nomoto T, Toyota T, Fujinami M. Anal Sci. 2013;29:865–869. doi: 10.2116/analsci.29.865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Pienpinijtham P, Vantasin S, Kitahama Y, Ekgasit S, Ozaki Y. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:14663–14668. doi: 10.1039/c8cp02108b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Zeng Z, Huang S, Wu D, Meng L, Li M, Huang T, Zhong J, Wang X, Yang Z, Ren B. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:11928–11931. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kurouski D, Mattei M, Van Duyne RP. Nano Lett. 2015;15:7956–7962. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Touzalin T, Dauphin AL, Joiret S, Lucas IT, Maisonhaute E. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:15510–15513. doi: 10.1039/c6cp02596j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Sabanes NM, Driessen LMA, Domke KF. Anal Chem. 2016;88:7108–7114. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kumar N, Stephanidis B, Zenobi R, Wain AJ, Roy D. Nanoscale. 2015;7:7133–7137. doi: 10.1039/c4nr07441f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zhong J, Jin X, Meng L, Wang X, Su H, Yang Z, Williams CT, Ren B. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12:132–136. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Tallarida N, Rios L, Apkarian VA, Lee J. Nano Lett. 2015;15:6386–6394. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Jiang N, Chiang N, Madison LR, Pozzi EA, Wasielewski MR, Seideman T, Ratner MA, Hersam MC, Schatz GC, Van Duyne RP. Nano Lett. 2016;16:3898–3904. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.El-Khoury PZ, Gong Y, Abellan P, Arey BW, Joly AG, Hu D, Evans JE, Browning ND, Hess WP. Nano Lett. 2015;15:2385–2390. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Bhattarai A, El-Khoury PZ. Chem Commun(Camb) 2017;53:7310–7313. doi: 10.1039/c7cc02593a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Tranca DE, Stanciu SG, Hristu R, Stoichita C, Tofail SA, Stanciu GA. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11876. doi: 10.1038/srep11876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Pollard B, Maia FC, Raschke MB, Freitas RO. Nano Lett. 2015;16:55–61. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Shi Z, Bechtel HA, Berweger S, Sun Y, Zeng B, Jin C, Chang H, Martin MC, Raschke MB, Wang F. ACS Photonics. 2015;2:790–796. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Alfaro-Mozaz FJ, Alonso-Gonzalez P, Velez S, Dolado I, Autore M, Mastel S, Casanova F, Hueso LE, Li P, Nikitin AY, Hillenbrand R. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15624. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Mastel S, Govyadinov AA, de Oliveira TV, Amenabar I, Hillenbrand R. Appl Phys Lett. 2015;106:023113. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Atkin JM, Berweger S, Jones AC, Raschke MB. Adv Phys. 2012;61:745–842. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Centrone A. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif) 2015;8:101–126. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071114-040435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Yoxall E, Schnell M, Mastel S, Hillenbrand R. Opt Express. 2015;23:13358–13369. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.013358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Wang H, Wang L, Xu XG. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13212. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Amenabar I, Poly S, Goikoetxea M, Nuansing W, Lasch P, Hillenbrand R. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14402. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.O’Callahan BT, Lewis WE, Möbius S, Stanley JC, Muller EA, Raschke MB. Opt Express. 2015;23:32063–32074. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.032063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Lahneman D, Huffman T, Xu P, Wang S, Grogan T, Qazilbash M. Opt Express. 2017;25:20421–20430. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.020421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ellis GJ, Martin MC. Eur Polym J. 2016;81:505–531. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Patoka P, Ulrich G, Nguyen AE, Bartels L, Dowben PA, Turkowski V, Rahman TS, Hermann P, Kästner B, Hoehl A. Opt Express. 2016;24:1154–1164. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.001154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hermann P, Kästner B, Hoehl A, Kashcheyevs V, Patoka P, Ulrich G, Feikes J, Ries M, Tydecks T, Beckhoff B. Opt Express. 2017;25:16574–16588. doi: 10.1364/OE.25.016574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Kehr SC, Döring J, Gensch M, Helm M, Eng LM. Synchrotron Radiat News. 2017;30:31–35. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Lin K, Komiyama S, Kajihara Y. Opt Lett. 2016;41:484–487. doi: 10.1364/OL.41.000484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Lin K, Komiyama S, Kim S, Kawamura K, Kajihara Y. Rev Sci Instrum. 2017;88:013706. doi: 10.1063/1.4973985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Wagner M, Andreev G, Carneiro K, Habelitz S, Mueller T. Microsc Microanal. 2015;21:1873. [Google Scholar]
- 128.Pollard B, Raschke MB. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2016;7:605. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.7.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Xu XG, Gilburd L, Bando Y, Golberg D, Walker GC. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:1945–1951. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Eisele M, Cocker TL, Huber MA, Plankl M, Viti L, Ercolani D, Sorba L, Vitiello MS, Huber R. Nat Photonics. 2014;8:841–845. [Google Scholar]
- 131.Wagner M, McLeod AS, Maddox SJ, Fei Z, Liu M, Averitt RD, Fogler MM, Bank SR, Keilmann F, Basov D. Nano Lett. 2014;14:4529–4534. doi: 10.1021/nl501558t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Dönges SA, Khatib O, O’Callahan BT, Atkin JM, Park JH, Cobden D, Raschke MB. Nano Lett. 2016;16:3029–3035. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Huber MA, Plankl M, Eisele M, Marvel R, Sandner F, Korn T, Schüller C, Haglund R, Jr, Huber R, Cocker TL. Nano Lett. 2016;16:1421–1427. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Dai S, Ma Q, Liu M, Andersen T, Fei Z, Goldflam M, Wagner M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Thiemens M. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10:682–686. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Barcelos ID, Cadore AR, Campos LC, Malachias A, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Maia FC, Freitas R, Deneke C. Nanoscale. 2015;7:11620–11625. doi: 10.1039/c5nr01056j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Kang J, Wang S, Shi Z, Zhao W, Yablonovitch E, Wang F. Nano Lett. 2017;17:1768–1774. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kim KS, Trajanoski D, Ho K, Gilburd L, Maiti A, van der Velden L, de Beer S, Walker GC. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8:2902–2908. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Bezares FJ, De Sanctis A, Saavedra JR, Woessner A, Alonso-González P, Amenabar I, Chen J, Bointon T, Dai S, Fogler MM. Nano Lett. 2017 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Levratovsky Y, Gross E. Farad Discuss. 2016;188:345–353. doi: 10.1039/c5fd00194c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Johnson CM, Böhmler M. Corros Sci. 2016;108:60–65. [Google Scholar]
- 141.Ayache M, Lux SF, Kostecki R. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015;6:1126–1129. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Khanikaev AB, Arju N, Fan Z, Purtseladze D, Lu F, Lee J, Sarriugarte P, Schnell M, Hillenbrand R, Belkin MA, Shvets G. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12045. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Muller EA, Pollard B, Bechtel HA, van Blerkom P, Raschke MB. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1601006. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Liu M, Sternbach AJ, Wagner M, Slusar TV, Kong T, Bud’ko SL, Kittiwatanakul S, Qazilbash M, McLeod A, Fei Z. Phys Rev B. 2015;91:245155. [Google Scholar]
- 145.Atkin JM, Sass PM, Teichen PE, Eaves JD, Raschke MB. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015;6:4616–4621. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Amrania H, Drummond L, Coombes R, Shousha S, Woodley-Barker L, Weir K, Hart W, Carter I, Phillips C. Farad Discuss. 2016;187:539–553. doi: 10.1039/c5fd00150a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Qin N, Zhang S, Jiang J, Corder SG, Qian Z, Zhou Z, Lee W, Liu K, Wang X, Li X, Shi Z, Mao Y, Bechtel HA, Martin MC, Xia X, Marelli B, Kaplan DL, Omenetto FG, Liu M, Tao TH. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13079. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Carneiro KM, Zhai H, Zhu L, Horst JA, Sitlin M, Nguyen M, Wagner M, Simpliciano C, Milder M, Chen C. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23105. doi: 10.1038/srep23105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Wiens R, Findlay CR, Baldwin SG, Kreplak L, Lee JM, Veres SP, Gough KM. Farad Discuss. 2016;187:555–573. doi: 10.1039/c5fd00168d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Khatib O, Wood JD, McLeod AS, Goldflam MD, Wagner M, Damhorst GL, Koepke JC, Doidge GP, Rangarajan A, Bashir R. ACS Nano. 2015;9:7968–7975. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Dazzi A, Prazeres R, Glotin F, Ortega J. Opt Lett. 2005;30:2388–2390. doi: 10.1364/ol.30.002388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Dazzi A, Prater CB. Chem Rev. 2016;117:5146–5173. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Lu F, Jin M, Belkin MA. Nat Photonics. 2014;8:307–312. [Google Scholar]
- 154.Dazzi A, Saunier J, Kjoller K, Yagoubi N. Int J Pharm. 2015;484:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Ramer G, Balbekova A, Schwaighofer A, Lendl B. Anal Chem. 2015;87:4415–4420. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Jin M, Lu F, Belkin MA. Light Sci Appl. 2017;6:e17096. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2017.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Baldassarre L, Giliberti V, Rosa A, Ortolani M, Bonamore A, Baiocco P, Kjoller K, Calvani P, Nucara A. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:075101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/7/075101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Giliberti V, Badioli M, Baldassarre L, Nucara A, Calvani P, Ritter E, Puskar L, Hegemann P, Schade U, Ortolani M. 41st International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves (Irmmw-Thz); 2016.2016. [Google Scholar]
- 159.Giliberti V, Badioli M, Baldassarre L, Nucara A, Calvani P, Ritter E, Puskar L, Hegemann P, Schade U, Ortolani M. Quantum Sensing and Nano Electronics and Photonics Xiv. 2017;10111:UNSP 101110D. [Google Scholar]
- 160.Ramer G, Reisenbauer F, Steindl B, Tomischko W, Lendl B. Appl Spectrosc. 2017;71:2013–2020. doi: 10.1177/0003702817695290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Donaldson PM, Kelley CS, Frogley MD, Filik J, Wehbe K, Cinque G. Opt Express. 2016;24:1852–1864. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.001852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Katzenmeyer AM, Holland G, Kjoller K, Centrone A. Anal Chem. 2015;87:3154–3159. doi: 10.1021/ac504672t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Lo MK, Dazzi A, Marcott CA, Dillon E, Hu Q, Kjoller K, Prater CB, King SW. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol. 2016;5:P3018–P3024. [Google Scholar]
- 164.Vitry P, Rebois R, Bourillot E, Deniset-Besseau A, Virolle M, Lesniewska E, Dazzi A. Nano Res. 2016;9:1674–1681. [Google Scholar]
- 165.Latour G, Robinet L, Dazzi A, Portier F, Deniset-Besseau A, Schanne-Klein MC. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26344. doi: 10.1038/srep26344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Katzenmeyer AM, Holland G, Chae J, Band A, Kjoller K, Centrone A. Nanoscale. 2015;7:17637–17641. doi: 10.1039/c5nr04854k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Wang L, Wang H, Wagner M, Yan Y, Jakob DS, Xu XG. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1700255. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Brown PS, Bhushan B. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21048. doi: 10.1038/srep21048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Tang F, Bao P, Su Z. Anal Chem. 2016;88:4926–4930. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Kelchtermans M, Lo M, Dillon E, Kjoller K, Marcott C. Vib Spectrosc. 2016;82:10–15. [Google Scholar]
- 171.Sang J, Sato R, Aisawa S, Hirahara H, Mori K. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;412:121–130. [Google Scholar]
- 172.Urbanek O, Sajkiewicz P, Pierini F, Czerkies M, Kołbuk D. Biomed Mater. 2017;12:015020. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa5647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Tang J, Liu Y, Zhu B, Su Y, Zhu X. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;393:299–308. [Google Scholar]
- 174.Cui Z, Coletta C, Rebois R, Baiz S, Gervais M, Goubard F, Aubert P, Dazzi A, Remita S. Radiat Phys Chem. 2016;119:157–166. [Google Scholar]
- 175.Coletta C, Cui Z, Dazzi A, Guigner J, Néron S, Marignier J, Remita S. Radiat Phys Chem. 2016;126:21–31. [Google Scholar]
- 176.Ghosh S, Kouamé NA, Ramos L, Remita S, Dazzi A, Deniset-Besseau A, Beaunier P, Goubard F, Aubert P, Remita H. Nat Mater. 2015;14:505. doi: 10.1038/nmat4220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Ghosh S, Ramos L, Remita S, Dazzi A, Deniset-Besseau A, Beaunier P, Goubard F, Aubert P, Remita H. New J Chem. 2015;39:8311–8320. [Google Scholar]
- 178.Gong L, Chase DB, Noda I, Liu J, Martin DC, Ni C, Rabolt JF. Macromolecules. 2015;48:6197–6205. [Google Scholar]
- 179.Gong L, Chase DB, Noda I, Marcott CA, Liu J, Martin DC, Ni C, Rabolt JF. Macromolecules. 2017;50:5510–5517. [Google Scholar]
- 180.Purohit HS, Taylor LS. Mol Pharm. 2015;12:4542–4553. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Li N, Taylor LS. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2016;13:1123–1136. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Morsch S, Lyon S, Smith SD, Gibbon SR. Prog Org Coat. 2015;86:173–180. [Google Scholar]
- 183.Morsch S, Lyon S, Greensmith P, Smith SD, Gibbon SR. Farad Discuss. 2015;180:527–542. doi: 10.1039/c4fd00229f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Morsch S, Lyon S, Gibbon S. Prog Org Coat. 2017;102:37–43. [Google Scholar]
- 185.Morsch S, Liu Y, Lyon SB, Gibbon SR. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:959–966. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b10767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Morsch S, Liu Y, Greensmith P, Lyon SB, Gibbon SR. Polymer. 2017;108:146–153. [Google Scholar]
- 187.Morsch S, van Driel BA, van den Berg KJ, Dik J. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:10169–10179. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b00638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Kennedy E, Al-Majmaie R, Al-Rubeai M, Zerulla D, Rice JH. J Biophotonics. 2015;8:133–141. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201300138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Quaroni L, Pogoda K, Zuber J, Kwiatek W. 2017 arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.01395. [Google Scholar]
- 190.Giliberti V, Baldassarre L, Rosa A, de Turris V, Ortolani M, Calvani P, Nucara A. Nanoscale. 2016;8:17560–17567. doi: 10.1039/c6nr05783g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Gruszecki W, Kulik A, Janik E, Bednarska J, Luchowski R, Grudzinski W, Dietler G. Nanoscale. 2015;7:14659–14662. doi: 10.1039/c5nr03090k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Rebois R, Onidas D, Marcott C, Noda I, Dazzi A. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409:2353–2361. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0181-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Wang X, Deng Y, Li Y, Kjoller K, Roy A, Wang S. RSC Adv. 2016;6:76318–76324. [Google Scholar]
- 194.Barlow DE, Biffinger JC, Cockrell-Zugell AL, Lo M, Kjoller K, Cook D, Lee WK, Pehrsson PE, Crookes-Goodson WJ, Hung C. Analyst. 2016;141:4848–4854. doi: 10.1039/c6an00940a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Khanal D, Kondyurin A, Hau H, Knowles JC, Levinson O, Ramzan I, Fu D, Marcott C, Chrzanowski W. Anal Chem. 2016;88:7530–7538. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Paluszkiewicz C, Piergies N, Chaniecki P, Rękas M, Miszczyk J, Kwiatek W. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017;139:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Ruggeri FS, Byrne C, Khemtemourian L, Ducouret G, Dietler G, Jacquot Y. J Pept Sci. 2015;21:95–104. doi: 10.1002/psc.2730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Ruggeri F, Longo G, Faggiano S, Lipiec E, Pastore A, Dietler G. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7831. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Ruggeri FS, Vieweg S, Cendrowska U, Longo G, Chiki A, Lashuel HA, Dietler G. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31155. doi: 10.1038/srep31155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Volpatti LR, Shimanovich U, Ruggeri FS, Bolisetty S, Müller T, Mason TO, Michaels TC, Mezzenga R, Dietler G, Knowles TP. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2016;4:7989–7999. doi: 10.1039/c6tb02683d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Galante D, Ruggeri FS, Dietler G, Pellistri F, Gatta E, Corsaro A, Florio T, Perico A, D’Arrigo C. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;79:261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Hu Q, Kjoller K, Myers A, Singh KJ, King SW. Vib Spectrosc. 2016;86:223–232. [Google Scholar]
- 203.Chae J, Dong Q, Huang J, Centrone A. Nano Lett. 2015;15:8114–8121. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Yuan Y, Chae J, Shao Y, Wang Q, Xiao Z, Centrone A, Huang J. Adv Energy Mater. 2015;5:1500615. [Google Scholar]
- 205.Yoon Y, Chae J, Katzenmeyer AM, Yoon HP, Schumacher J, An S, Centrone A, Zhitenev N. Nanoscale. 2017;9:7771–7780. doi: 10.1039/c7nr01480e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Strelcov E, Dong Q, Li T, Chae J, Shao Y, Deng Y, Gruverman A, Huang J, Centrone A. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1602165. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Aksyuk V, Lahiri B, Holland G, Centrone A. Nanoscale. 2015;7:3634–3644. doi: 10.1039/c4nr06755j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Chae J, Lahiri B, Kohoutek J, Holland G, Lezec H, Centrone A. Opt Express. 2015;23:25912–25922. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.025912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Chae J, Lahiri B, Centrone A. ACS Photonics. 2016;3:87–95. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Jahng J, Ladani FT, Khan RM, Potma EO. Complex Light and Optical Forces X. 2016;9764:UNSP 97641J. [Google Scholar]
- 211.Ladani FT, Potma EO. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:205440. [Google Scholar]
- 212.Jahng J, Fishman DA, Park S, Nowak DB, Morrison WA, Wickramasinghe HK, Potma EO. Acc Chem Res. 2015;48:2671–2679. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Jahng J, Kim B, Lee ES, Potma EO. Phys Rev B. 2016;94:195407. [Google Scholar]
- 214.Soliman M, Ding Y, Tetard L, Kazantsev D, Kuznetsov E, Timofeev S. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2017;56:08LA04. [Google Scholar]
- 215.Yamanishi J, Naitoh Y, Li Y, Sugawara Y. Appl Phys Lett. 2017;110:123102. [Google Scholar]
- 216.Jahng J, Ladani FT, Khan RM, Li X, Lee ES, Potma EO. Opt Lett. 2015;40:5058–5061. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.005058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Ambrosio A, Devlin RC, Capasso F, Wilson WL. ACS Photonics. 2017;4:846–851. [Google Scholar]
- 218.Huang F, Tamma VA, Mardy Z, Burdett J, Wickramasinghe HK. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10610. doi: 10.1038/srep10610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Tumkur TU, Yang X, Cerjan B, Halas NJ, Nordlander P, Thomann I. Nano Lett. 2016;16:7942–7949. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Nowak D, Morrison W, Wickramasinghe HK, Jahng J, Potma E, Wan L, Ruiz R, Albrecht TR, Schmidt K, Frommer J. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1501571. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Jacobs IE, Aasen EW, Nowak D, Li J, Morrison W, Roehling JD, Augustine MP, Moulé AJ. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1603221. doi: 10.1002/adma.201603221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Jahng J, Brocious J, Fishman DA, Yampolsky S, Nowak D, Huang F, Apkarian VA, Wickramasinghe HK, Potma EO. Appl Phys Lett. 2015;106:083113. [Google Scholar]
- 223.Tamma VA, Huang F, Nowak D, Kumar Wickramasinghe H. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;108:233107. [Google Scholar]
- 224.Tamma VA, Beecher LM, Shumaker-Parry JS, Wickramasinghe HK. 2017 doi: 10.1364/OE.26.031439. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.04986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Kim B, Jahng J, Khan RM, Park S, Potma EO. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:075440. [Google Scholar]