Abstract
Peru is a megadiverse country with native species of all kinds, including dye plants, which have been used for hundreds of years by the local population. Despite the fact that many of these natural dyes are of a superior quality compared to synthetic ones and do not have the harmful effects that the latter may cause to human health, due to the lack of documentation and dissemination, ethnobotanical knowledge is unfortunately being lost with the passing of generations. In order to preserve and spread such valuable knowledge, this study conducted a comprehensive taxonomic, phytogeographic, and ethnobotanical inventory of dye plants based on periodical botanical explorations in selected locations of Northern Peru during the span of two decades. A critical review of the specialized bibliography was then carried out and the findings were verified with the personal knowledge and experience of both the researchers and the local and regional people. The results of the inventory record 32 species of dye plants from Northern Peru distributed in 22 families, of which the following stand out due to the number of species: Fabaceae (5), Anacardiaceae (2), Annonaceae (2), Asteraceae (2), Berberidaceae (2), Rosaceae (2), and Solanaceae (2). Of the 32 dye species identified, four are considered endemic from Peru: Berberis buceronis J.F. Macbr., Caesalpinia paipai Ruiz & Pav., Coreopsis senaria S.F. Blake & Sherf., and Lomatia hirsuta (Lam.) Diels. The study also found that species such as Bixa orellana L., Indigofera suffruticosa Mill., Sambucus peruviana, and the lichen Usnea baileyi (Stirton) Zahlbr have not been commercially exploited in Peru despite the fact that they already constitute a great economic source for several countries.
Keywords: taxonomic inventory, botanical explorations, Herbarium Truxillense, endemic species, Andes Mountains
1. Introduction
Plant and animal domestication has been perhaps the most important development in the rise of human civilization [1]. Humans rely on plants for food, feed for their domestic animals, construction materials, medicines, paper, fibers, dyes, and cosmetics, etc.
The use of dye plants and colorants from mineral and animal origin dates back to ancient times, and has been a very important resource for human beings [2]. Anthropological and archaeological studies and historians and chroniclers have analyzed the use of dyes through time, from the cave paintings of civilizations such as the Olmec, Maya, Aztec, Teotihuacan, Paracas, Tiawanako, and Chavín, as well as in diverse artistic representations in bicolor and polychrome pottery, painted murals, and in textile figures and fragments which demonstrate the use of paints and dyes not only in ceremonial objects, but also in fabric [3].
A megadiverse country like Peru has great botanical wealth [4,5] and is home to plants, which contain active coloring substances such as flavonoids, xanthones, quinones, and carotenoids [6,7], among other substances with high potential for use in the textile, cosmetic, and food industries. These have been cultivated and used until now by the local population, and in many regards, surpass artificial dyes.
Natural dyes, such as those obtained from the Bixa orellana L., Usnea baileyi (Stirton) Zahlbr.b, Alnus acuminata H.B.K., Berberis buceronis Macb., Bocconia integrifolia Bonpl., Caesalpinia spinosa (Feuillée ex Molina) Kuntze, Coreopsis senaria Blake & Sherff., Lomatia hirsuta (Lam.) Diels, Polylepis incana Kunth, Hypericum laricifolium Juss, and many other plants produce colors that are esthetically superior and environmentally friendly. Moreover, these natural dyes lack the substances that can cause injurious or allergic reactions in the consumers [8], produce attention deficit/hyperactivity in children [9,10], and/or have been prohibited by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States of America [11]. In addition, synthetic dyes generate water pollution, among other environmental effects [12]. Some studies have also demonstrated that fabrics colored with vegetable dyes fade less, or fade more harmonically and without jarring differences in color [13,14].
There have been various research initiatives related to ethnobotanical studies worldwide. Ivancheva and Stantcheva (2000) reported on the traditional use of medicinal plants in Bulgaria and identified 73 medicinal plants of 30 families [15]. Idolo et al. (2010) conducted an ethnobotanical inventory of one of the oldest national parks in Europe and highlighted the importance of nature preservation to preserve traditional knowledge [16]. Kaval et al. (2014) compiled ethnobotanical information on medicinal plants used in a Turkish region and found the extensive use of such plants for therapeutical purposes [17]. Amjad (2015) compiled the use of medicinal plants and other folk native plants of the Bana Valley in Pakistan to preserve the ethnobotanical knowledge of the region [18]. In the case of Peru, there have been some research initiatives on dye plants. Cornejo (1981), for instance, analyzed the dye plants in Huamanga province and their application in textile crafts [19]. Soukup (1986) compiled an inventory of the common names of Peruvian native plants including dye plants [20]. Rodriguez et al. (2017) analyzed data of Peruvian herbaria and identified some dye plants of La Libertad Region in Peru [21]. However, in all the cases, the studies only focused on the random inventory of the dye plants and some empirical applications. In this sense, the limited systematic documentation and dissemination of the traditional knowledge obtained through the empirical use of many plant species in Northern Peru is notorious. Because of this, establishing a link between the scientific and empirical knowledge of these plants is of the utmost importance [22,23,24]. This study attempts to fill this gap by not only providing a comprehensive inventory of the dye plants used in northern Peru, but also by compiling and disseminating their traditional uses and main characteristics based on the interviews conducted with local people.
2. Material and Methods
This study is based on the personal experience and observations of the authors. The authors carried out specimen collections during botanical excursions to various locations in the departments of Northern Peru. An average of two 10-day expeditions were carried out annually for two decades (from 1996 to 2016). A summary of the expedition routes is provided in Figure 1 and the details of the explored places are provided in Table 1.
Figure 1.
Botanical explorations conducted by the authors.
Table 1.
Botanical exploration routes.
| Exploration Number | Places Explored |
|---|---|
| 1 | Trujillo, Chiclayo, Piura, Canchaque, Jalca Chingelas, San Ignacio, Cordillera El Condor, Jaen, Chamaya, Olmos, Chiclayo, Trujillo. |
| 2 | Trujillo, Chimbote, Pativilca, Laguna Conococha, Chiquian (Bolognesi), Recuay, Huaraz, Carhuaz, Yungay, Caraz, Trujillo. |
| 3 | Trujillo, Pativilca, Conococha, Catac, Chavin De Huantar, Huari, Llamellin, Pomabamba, Huascaran, Yungay, Huaraz, Cordillera Negra, Casma, Chimbote, Trujillo. |
| 4 | Trujillo, Santa (Chimbote), San Jacinto, Jimbe, Lampanim, Cordillera Negra, Huaylas, Cañon Del Pato, Pampas, Sihuas, Pallasca, Cabana, Corongo, Sihuas, Tayabamba, Buldibuyo, La Paccha, Huamachuco, Shorey, Otuzco, Trujillo. |
| 5 | Trujillo, Casa Grande, Cascas, Chuquillanqui, Compin, San Ignacio, Sinsicap, Simbal, Otuzco, Usquil, Coina, Huaranchal, Trujillo. |
| 6 | Trujillo, Salpo, Agallpampa, Shorey, Santiago De Chuco, Calipuy, Cachicadan (La Botica), Trujillo. |
| 7 | Trujillo, Agallpampa, Shorey, Huamachuco, Pias, Pataz, Parque Nacional Rio Abiseo, Trujillo. |
| 8 | Trujillo, Chiclayo, Olmos, Chamaya, Bagua, Pedro Ruiz, Chachapoyas, Rodriguez De Mendoza, Chachapoyas, Leimebamba, Laguna De Los Condores, Jalca Calla Calla, Longotea, Bolivar, Nevado Cajamarquilla, Huayabamba, Valle Del Marañon, Balsas, Gelic, Celendin, Cajamarca, Trujillo. |
| 9 | Trujillo, Chiclayo, Olmos, Chamaya, Pomacochas, Rioja, Moyobamba, Tarapoto, Yurimaguas, Bellavista, Juanjui, Tocache, Tingo Maria, Pucallpa, Huanuco, Cerro De Pasco, Lima, Huarmey, Chimbote, Trujillo. |
| 10 | Trujillo, Shorey, Huamachuco, Cajabamba, Valle Condebamba, Cajamarca, Porcon, Cumbemayo, Chetilla, Magdalena, Chilete, Tembladera, Trujillo. |
| 11 | Trujillo, Chiclayo, Piura, Sullana, Paita, Talara, Mancora, Punta Sal, Tumbes, Parque Nacional Cerros De Amotape, Santuario Nacional Los Manglares, Zarumilla, Trujillo. |
| 12 | Trujillo, Chiclayo, Canchaque, Huacabamba, San Antonio, Jalca De Las Huaringas, Ayabaca, Latina, Frontera Con Ecuador, Sullana, Piura, Trujillo. |
| 13 | Trujillo, Cascas, Contumaza, Chilete, Cajamarca, Hualgayoc, San Miguel, San Pablo, Chilete, Trujillo. |
| 14 | Trujillo, Ascope, San Benito, Guzmango, Cruz Grande Tantarica, Catan, Chilete, Trinidad, Tembladera, Trujillo. |
| 15 | Trujillo, Casca,- Contumaza, Cascabamba, Jalca Pozo Kuan, La Asuncion, Cajamarca, Trujillo. |
| 16 | Trujillo, Chiclayo, Santa Cruz, Chota, Cutervo, San Andres, Parque Nacional De Cutervo, Chota, Bambamarca, Hualgayoc, Cajamarca, Trujillo. |
This study is also based on the explorations, collections, and records of dye plant species used many generations ago available in the National University of Trujillo Herbarium also known as Herbarium Truxillense or HUT. These explorations gathered facts about the taxonomy, growth habit, altitudinal distribution, methods of propagation, parts of the plant utilized, and color produced from northern Peruvian dye plants.
The information about common names, parts of the plants used, and the color produced by the species was obtained directly from surveys conducted with local populations, according to the labels accompanying the species registered in the HUT and notes recorded directly during the explorations.
The botanical specimens collected, once preserved, were registered in the HUT, and duplicates were sent to different herbaria, including the Missouri Botanical Garden, and the Chicago Field Museum in the United States, for taxonomic confirmation. It is worth mentioning that the specimens were identified using the taxonomic key referring to Peruvian flora in accordance with [25,26].
3. Results and Discussion
Scientific names, families, common names, growth habit, altitudinal distribution, types of plants propagation, parts of the plants used, and colors obtained from 32 species of dye plants collected in Northern Peru are given in Table 2. The 32 species were grouped into 29 genera and 22 families.
Table 2.
Characteristics of dye plant species found in Northern Peru.
| Scientific Name | Common Names | Plant Type | Ecology and Distribution in PERU (Meters above Sea Level) | Propagation | Parts Used | Colors Obtained |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Achyrocline satureioides (Lam.) DC—ASTERACEAE | árnica, corinilla sacha, wira huayo, huira, vira | Herbaceous plant up to 70 cm in height | From 2500–2800 m Departments: AM, CU, HU, JU, PU, SM. |
Seed | The entire plant, [27] | Yellow to green [27] |
| Agave americana (L.) a, b—ASPARAGACEAE | ckara, cabuya, maguey, penca, pinca mara, okcepajpa packpa, pita, cabuya azul, chuchao, pacpa, pappa, maguey mexicano, méxico, kellupancarita. | Succulent with mucronate leaves. Trees up to 10 m tall | Between 500–3200 m. | Bulb | Leaves [26] | Yellow to clear [26,27] |
| Alnus acuminata Kunth—BETULACEAE | aliso, huayau, lambrán, ramras, lambras, ramram, lamra. | Tree 15–30 m in height | Disturbed areas, forest, grassland, riversides, shrublands. From 0–4000 m. Departments: AM, AN, AP, CA, CU, HU, JU, LA, LI, LL, PI, PU |
Seed and vegetative | Crushed leaves, bark [26] | Yellow to green. Cinnamon to Brown or from yellow to beige [26,27] |
| Anacardium occidentale L. a, b—ANACARDIACEAE | marañón, caju, casu, cashu, casha, acayocha, cashew, ñucñubaras, ñucñubares | Tree 10 m in height | Disturbed areas. Grows up to 100 m. Departments: CU, HU, JU, LO, PA, SM, UC. |
Seed | Fruit (juice) | Yellow |
| Annona cherimola Mill. d—ANNONACEAE | chirimoya | Tree 10 m in height | Grows up to 1500–2200 m Departments: AM, HU, LI. |
Seed and vegetative | Bark and fruit | Black |
| Annona muricata L. a, b—ANNONACEAE | guanabana, guanabano, masambo, corosol, cachiman. | Tree between 7–9 m in height | Grows up to 1000 m Department: LO. |
Seed and vegetative | Bark and fruit | Black |
| Berberis buceronis J.F. Macbr. b—BERBERIDACEAE | palo amarillo, chulgan | Endemic shrub. Spiny shrub up to 2 m in height | Between 2500–3500 m [28] Department: LL. |
Seed | Bark, wood, root, and fruit | Yellow |
| Berberis lutea Ruiz & Pav. b—BERBERIDACEAE | chicchi, ccarahuascassa, espino amarillo, chupite. | Shrub up to 1.5 m tall | Rocky slopes. Grows up to 3800 m. Departments AM, AN, AY, CA, HU, LI, PA, PI, PU, SM. |
Bark | Root [27] | Yellow [27] |
| Bocconia integrifolia Bonpl. d—PAPAVERACEAE | ache, picullo, pingullo, pincullo. | Small trees 5 m tall | Rocky slopes. Between 1300–3100 m. Departments: AM, CA, CU, HU, HV, JU, LL, PA, PI, PU. |
Seed | Bark, stem, and leaves [26,28] | Yellow and orange |
| Caesalpinia paipai Ruiz & Pav.a—FABACEAE | pay-pay, carpe, chara, chorán, pai-pai, tanquis. | Endemic shrub up to 5 m tall | Dry valleys, rocky slopes. Grows up to 800 m. Department: PI. |
Seed | Fruit | Black |
| Caesalpinia spinosa (Feuillée ex Molina) Kuntze—FABACEAE | taya, tara, algarroba. | Endemic shrub or tree 3–10 m in height | Lomas, shrublands. From 1500–3100 m. Departments: AM, AN, AR, AY, CA, CU, HU, HV, IC, JU, LI, MD, PI, TA. |
Seed | Crushed fruit, fresh fruit, bark, and veins [26,28] | Dark grey to beige. Mordant and fixative. Yellow and green [27] |
| Cassia hookeriana Gillies ex Hook. & Arn. b.—FABACEAE | mutuy | Straight tree 3–4 m in height | From 2700–3800 m. Departments: AM, AP, AY, CA |
Seed | Leaves and stem | Yellow and green [27] |
| Coriaria ruscifolia L. b.—CORIARIACEAE | mío-mío, saca-saca | Shrub up to 3 m tall | Disturbed areas, forest, shrublands. From 2500–3800 m. Departments: AM, AP, AY, CA, CU, HU, HV, JU, LL, PU. |
Seed | Fruit (juice) | Violet [26] |
| Coreopsis senaria S.F. Blake & Sherff—ASTERACEAE | pull, pagua, pana, panan | Shrub | Grasslands, rocky slopes, shrublands. From 2500–2800 m. Departments: AM, CA, LL. |
Seed | Leaves, flower, and stem | Black and yellow |
| Escallonia resinosa —Ruiz & Pav. d—ESCALLONIACEAE | chachas, chacacoma, chachacuma, china-ckenhua, tatás, puca-tirisún, shun, tiriencarnado, siuba | Shrub 2–2.5 m tall. Tree up to 6 m in height |
Disturbed areas, forest, shrublands. From 2800–3900 m. Departments: AN, AP, AR, AY, CA, CU, HU, JU, LL. |
Seed | Leaves and crushed branches (stem) | Red or flesh-colored and purple. Beige and brown [27] |
| Hypericum laricifolium Juss. d—HYPERICACEAE | chinchaga | Shrub up to 1 m tall | Cloud forest, shrublands. From 2800–3500 m. Departments: AM, AN, CA, HU, LL, PA, PI, SM. |
Seed | Stem and leaves | Yellow |
| Indigofera suffruticosa Mill. a—FABACEAE | angaschi, piroañil, añil-añil, llangua, indigo, mutui, mutiucube mutuy. | Shrub up to 2 m tall | Disturbed areas, forests, riversides, and rocky slopes. From 100–1500 m. Departments: AM, AP, AY, CA, CU, HU, JU, LA, LI, LL, LO, PU, SM, TU, UC. |
Seed | Leaves | Blue |
| Juglans neotropica Diels. d—JUGLANDACEAE | nogal, nogal del país | Tree between 18 and 30 m in height | Disturbed areas. From 1100–3000 m. Departments: AM, AY, CA, CU, HU, HV, LA, LI, PA. |
Seed | Leaves, stem, bark, fruit shell. Fruit juice. | Beige, brown. Yellow to dark brown. Black. |
| Kageneckia lanceolata Ruiz & Pav. b—ROSACEAE | lloque, loque, quisi, uritumicuna | Shrub up to 5 m tall | Disturbed areas, dry valleys, forests, rocky slopes and shrublands. From 2500–3000 m [28] Departments: AM, AN, AP, AY, CA, CU, HU, LI, LL, TA. |
Seed | Leaves | Black. |
| Lomatia hirsuta (Lam.) Diels. d—PROTEACEAE | andanga, chotabal, andanca, andagara, gaco, raral, shiapash. | Shrubs up to 3 m in height | Cloud forests, shrub lands. From 2500–3000 m. [28] Departments: CA, LA, PI |
Seed | Stem and leaves | Brown. |
| Monnina salicifolia Ruiz & Pav. b—POLYGALACEAE | pichuca, callacón, hachiquís, muchuy, pshuatahuiuac, sambockorota, muchi, ancausa, tutahuiña | Small, woody shrub | Disturbed areas, grasslands, riversides, rocky slopes, semi Deciduous, forests. From 2000–2800 m. Departments: AM, AN, AP, AY, CA, CU, HU, HV, JU, LI, LL, PU. |
Seed | Crushed ripe fruit. | Greenish blue. |
| Muehlenbeckia tamnifolia (Kunth) Meisn. b—POLYGONACEAE | bejuco, bajuco, puma-huascarán | Shrub or woody plant, climbing plant (vine) | Disturbed areas, elfin forest, rocky slopes and shrublands. From 2200–4500 m. Departments: AM, AN, AP, AR, CA, CU, HU, JU, LII. |
Seed | Ripe fruit | Purple |
| Orthrosanthus chimboracensis (Kunth) Baker. b—IRIDACEAE | lirio de jalca, paja purgante, matara, tekel, tuna ocsha, ossapurga | Herbaceous | Disturbed areas, grasslands. From 2500–4000 m. Departments: AM, AN, CA, HU, JU, PI, |
Seed | Root | Yellow-orange |
| Polylepis incana Kunth. b—ROSACEAE | quinual, cuña, manzanita, queuña, queños | Tree up to 25 m tall | Dry valleys, forest, shrublands. From 2800–4800 m. Departments.: AN, CU, HU, PA. |
Cutting | Leaves or crushed branches | Beige |
| Prosopis pallida (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) Kunth. a—FABACEAE | algarrobo | Tree 6 to 8 m tall | Desert, rocky slopes, semi-deciduous forests. From 50–1500 m. Departments: AM, AN, AP, AR, CA., HV, IC, LA, LI, LL, PI, TA, TU. |
Seed | Stem and leaves | |
| Salix humboldtiana Willd.—SALICACEAE | sauce, huayan, pajaro bobo | Shrub or tree up to 10 m in height | Disturbed, areas, forests. Up to 3000 m. Departments: AM, AR, CU, IC, LA, LI, LO, MD, PI, SM, UC. |
Vegetative, cutting | Bark | Brown |
| Sambucus peruviana Kunth. a, b—ADOXACEAE | saúco, arrayán, ccola, kjola (v. aimara), layan, r’ayan, ramrash, yalam | Shrub or tree 4 to 6 m tall | Disturbed areas, forests, rocky slopes, shrub lands. From 2800–3900 m [28]. Departments: AM, CA, CU, HU, LI, PA. |
Asexually through cutting | Fruit and leaves | Metallic blue (wine-colored) [28] |
| Schinus molle L. a, b—ANACARDIACEAE | molle, árbol de la vida, cullash, falsa pimienta, huiñam, mulli | Tree 4 to 9 m in height | Rocky slopes. Throughout the Peruvian Andes from 100 to 3200 m. Departments: AN, AR, AY, CA, CU, HU, IC, JU, LI, LL, MO, PA, TA. |
Seed | Crushed leaves, mordant bath of leaves, branches, bark, and roots | Yellow to green. Pale yellow |
| Salpichroa weberbauerii Dammer Miers. b—SOLANACEAE | pepenillo, cuytulambo, cuytulum | Shrub up to 2.5 m in height | From 2500–2800 m. Departments: CA, LL, AN, AP, AY, CU, MO |
Seed | Fruit | Black |
| Solanum americanum Mill.—SOLANACEAE | hierba mora, ají ccaya-ccaya, cajaya-cajaya, kaya-kaya | Herb up to 50 cm tall | From 10–2500 m. Departments: AM, CA, CU, HU, JU, LA, LI, LO, NID, |
Fruit | Blue | |
| Tropaeolum majus L. a, b—TROPAEOLACEAE | mastuerzo, aparacay, capuchina mayor, espuela de caballero, tícsau | Herbaceous | Disturbed areas. From 30–2000 m. Departments: AR, CU, LI, LL, TA. |
Seed | Plant sap, stems | Yellow |
| Usnea baileyi (Stirton) Zahlbr. b—PARMELIACEAE | líquen, shapra | Surface lichen | From 2500–3500 m [28] | Spores | Entire plant, crushed. | Brown |
AM: Amazonas; AN: Ancash; AP: Apurimac; AR: Arequipa; AY: Ayacucho; CA: Cajamarca; CU: Cuzco; HU:Huanuco; HV: Huancavelica; IC: Ica; JU: Junin; LA: Lambayeque; LI: Lima; LL: La Libertad; LO: Loreto; MD: Madre De Dios; MO: Moquegua; PA: Pasco; PI: Piura; PU: Puno; SM: San Martin; TA: Tacna; TU: Tumbes; UC: Ucayali
The findings of the study were complemented with the work conducted by [28,29]. These studies were critically reviewed regarding taxonomy, growth habit, altitudinal distribution, types of plants propagation, parts of the plant utilized, and color produced from the species of dye plants, which grow in northern Peru.
This research also confirms the findings of previous studies in the region including the works of [2,14,27,28]. The specimens collected in Northern Peru, both by the authors of this research and by other botanists, have been registered in the HUT, with their corresponding notes about the properties of the plants in each area, locality, or region (see Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Herbarium specimens of dye plant species registered in the Herbarium Truxillense.
Of the 32 dye species identified, five are considered endemic from Peru: Berberis buceronis, Caesalpinia paipai, Caesalpinia spinosa, Coreopsis senaria, and Lomatia hirsuta [25]. Moreover, with the exception of Caesalpinia spinosa, which is endemic to various countries in America, the other four species are endemic to Northern Peru. The other 27 species are widely distributed across the Coast, Highlands, and Amazon regions. It is worth mentioning that Annona cherimolia and Annona muricata are endemic to both Northern Peru and Southern Ecuador [27]. Species such as Anacardium occidentale, Bocconia integrifolia, Agave americana, Alnus acuminata, Escallonia resinosa, and Juglans neotropica are widely distributed across South and Central America [25].
The results of the inventory record 32 species of dye plants from Northern Peru distributed in 22 families, of which the following stand out due to the number of species: Fabaceae (5), Anacardiaceae (2), Annonaceae (2), Asteraceae (2), Berberidaceae (2), Rosaceae (2), and Solanaceae (2) (see Table 3).
Table 3.
Number of dye plant species by family.
| Family | Number of Species | Family | Number of Species |
|---|---|---|---|
| FABACEAE | 5 | ESCALLONIACEAE | 1 |
| ASTERACEAE | 2 | HYPERICACEAE | 1 |
| ANNONACEAE | 2 | JUGLANDACEAE | 1 |
| BERBERIDACEAE | 2 | PROTEACEAE | 1 |
| ROSACEAE | 2 | POLYGALACEAE | 1 |
| SOLANACEAE | 2 | POLYGONACEAE | 1 |
| ANACARDIACEAE | 2 | IRIDACEAE | 1 |
| ASPARAGACEAE | 1 | SALICACEAE | 1 |
| BETULACEAE | 1 | ADOXACEAE | 1 |
| PAPAVERACEAE | 1 | TROPAEOLACEAE | 1 |
| CORIARIACEAE | 1 | PARMELIACEAE | 1 |
The study also identified many dye plants that are only known by certain Andean communities, which have preserved the old customs or traditions of their use: Lomatia hirsute, Achyrocline satureioides, Annona cherimolia, Berberis buceronis, Coriaria ruscifolia, Coreopsis senaria, Hypericum laricifolium, Monnina salicifolia, Orthrosanthus chimboracensis, and Salpichroa diffusa.
We also identified that some plants continue to be used extensively despite the great quantity of synthetic colorants that chemical companies have placed in the market. This is the case for: Alnusacuminate, Bocconia integrifolia, Caesalpinia paipai, Caesalpinia spinosa, Juglans neotropica, Kageneckia lanceolata, and Polylepis incana. Finally, some species such as Bixa orellana, Indigofera suffruticosa, Sambucus peruviana, and Usnea baileyi constitute a great economic source for several countries [14,27,28]. However, their use has not been industrialized in Peru.
The inventory of northern Peruvian dye plants presented in this article differs in its content from others listed in the bibliography. [28], for example, only offers taxonomic information about some of the species, while [14,27] have inventoried a greater number of species and in addition to taxonomy have included facts concerning the plants’ distribution, parts of the plants used, and the colors produced by some of them. The inventory presented in this article for Northern Peru is more comprehensive, because it is not only based on the number of species listed, but also because of the information provided about the characteristics (taxonomy, growth habit, altitudinal distribution, form of propagation, part of the plant utilized, and the color obtained) of the inventoried species.
In the botanical world, one cannot generalize that chemicals have a preference to accumulate in a specific plant organ. Therefore, many plants have the principle colorants in their roots, others in the stem, others in the leaves and flowers, and others in the fruit. Of the 32 species analyzed, the principle colorants were found in the stem of 35% of species, 29% in the leaves, 28% in the fruit, 6% in the root, and 3% in the flowers. What can be generalized is that the colorants are deposited according to the order of the percentages mentioned in this research. The natural dyes obtained from the plants are considered an ecological solution to artificial ones. Schmidt-Przewoźna and Brandys (2016) stated that plant extracts contain tannins, flavenoids, saponins, essential oils, mucilage, vitamins, and many other valuable substances, besides being a source of beautiful natural colors [30].
4. Conclusions
This study aimed to fill the gap that represents the limited systematic documentation and dissemination of the traditional knowledge obtained through the empirical use of many plant species in Northern Peru. The research identified and inventoried 32 species of dye plants that grow in northern Peru, distributed in 22 families, which can be broken down by number of species into the following groups: Fabaceae (5) and Anacardiaceae (2), Annonaceae (2), Asteraceae (2), Berberidaceae (2), Rosaceae (2), and Solanaceae (2). Of the 32 dye species identified, four are considered endemic to Peru: Berberis buceronis, Caesalpinia paipai, Coreopsis senaria, and Lomatia hirsute. The study also found that species such as Bixa orellana, Indigofera suffruticosa, Sambucus peruviana, and Usnea baileyi have not been commercially exploited in Peru despite the fact that they already constitute a great economic source for several countries.
This study also compiled the explorations, collections, and records of dye plant species used many generations ago available in the HUT. These explorations gathered facts about the taxonomy, growth habit, altitudinal distribution, methods of propagation, parts of the plant utilized, and color produced from northern Peruvian dye plants. Documenting and preserving traditional knowledge is very important, as it is part of the cultural heritage of indigenous people.
Finally, as we know, the lack of appropriate documentation on the plant extraction and dyeing techniques is an important factor for the continuous loss of this traditional knowledge. Our future work will focus on investigating and documenting these techniques for their preservation.
Author Contributions
José Mostacero León conceived and designed the study; José Mostacero León, Segundo E. López Medina and Jordan De La Cruz Castillo conducted the botanical explorations; Helmut Yabar analyzed the data; José Mostacero León and Helmut Yabar wrote the paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Diamond J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature. 2002;418:700–707. doi: 10.1038/nature01019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hill C. An Introduction to Sustainable Resource Use. Routledge; London, UK: 2011. p. 256. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ivic de Montenegro M., Berger M. El arte sale de las casas: Los tintes naturales en San Juan La Laguna, Sololá. In: De Monterroso M., Azurdiaq I., editors. Ciencia y Técnicas Maya. Fundación Solar; Guatemala, Guatemala: 2008. pp. 101–133. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marinelli J. La Referencia Visual más Actual de Plantas y Flores del Mundo. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Royal Botanic Gardens Kew; Mexico City, Mexico: 2006. Planta; p. 512. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sanjinés A., Asturizaga B., Henrik B. Frutos Comestibles, Botánica Económica de Los Andes Centrales. Universidad Mayor de San Andrés; La Paz, Bolivia: 2006. pp. 329–346. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 6.López L., Leyva E., García R. Naphthoquinones: More than natural pigments. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Farm. 2011;42:6–17. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mouri C., Mozaffarian V., Zhang Z., Laursen R. Characterization of flavonols in plants used for textile dyeing and the significance of flavonol conjugates. Dyes Pigment. 2014;100:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.08.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Iannacone J., Alvariño L. Ecotoxicología acuática de dos colorantes y de tres antiparasitarios de importancia en acuicultura en Daphnia Magna. Ecol. Appl. 2007;6:101–110. doi: 10.21704/rea.v6i1-2.346. (In Spanish) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bateman B., Warner J.O., Hutchinson E. The effects of a double blind, placebo controlled, artificial food colourings and benzoate preservative challenge on hyperactivity in a general population sample of preschool children. Arch. Dis. Child. 2004;89:506–511. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.031435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McCann D., Barrett A., Cooper A., Crumpler D., Dalen L., Grimashaw K., Kitchin E., Lok K., Porteous L., Prince E., et al. Food additives and hyperactive behavior in 3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children in the community: A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:1560–1567. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61306-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lozano J., Rosales L., Marcelo A. Obtención del colorante rojo en polvo por atomización a partir de la betarraga (Beta vulgaris) Boletín de la Sociedad Química del Perú. 1993;59:175–183. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khan S., Malik A. Environmental and Health Effects of Textile Industry Wastewater. In: Malik A., Grohmann E., Akhtar R., editors. Environmental Deterioration and Human Health. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2013. pp. 55–71. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Camargo G. Especies nuevas del género Berberia de Colombia, Ecuador y Venezuela. Caldasia. 1966;9:313–351. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reynel C., Morales C. Agroforestería Tradicional en Los Andes del Perú. Proyecto FAO/Holanda/INFOR; Lima, Peru: 1987. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ivancheva S., Stantcheva B. Ethnobotanical inventory of medicinal plants in Bulgaria. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000;69:165–172. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00129-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Idolo M., Motti R., Mazzoleni S. Ethnobotanical and phytomedicinal knowledge in a long-history protected area the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park (Italian Apennines) J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010;127:379–395. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kaval I., Behçet L., Cakilcioglu U. Ethnobotanical study on medicinal plants in Geçitli and its surrounding (Hakkari-Turkey) J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014;155:171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Amjad M.S. Ethnobotanical profiling and floristic diversity of Bana Valley, Kotli (Azad Jammu and Kashmir), Pakistan. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015;5:292–299. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(15)30348-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cornejo A. Plantas Tintóreas de la Provincia de Huamanga y su Aplicación en Artesanía Textil. Universidad Nacional de San Cristóbal de Huamanga; Huamanga, Peru: 1981. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 20.Soukup J. Vocabulario de Los Nombres Vulgares de la Flora Peruana. Editorial Salesiana; Lima, Peru: 1986. p. 436. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rodriguez E., Rodriguez S., Paredes Y., Rimarachin V. Vegetales tintóreos promisorios más utilizados en la región La Libertad, Perú. Arnaldoa. 2017;24:311–332. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 22.Quintriqueo S. Implicancias de un Modelo Curricular Monocultural en el Contexto Mapuche. Gráfica LOM; Santiago, Chile: 2010. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 23.Quintriqueo S., McGinity M. Implicancias de un modelo curricular monocultural en la construcción de la identidad sociocultural de alumnos/as mapuches de la IX región de La Araucanía, Chile. Estudios Pedagóg. 2009;35:173–188. doi: 10.4067/S0718-07052009000200010. (In Spanish) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alvarado M.A., Flores-Camacho F. Percepciones y supuestos sobre la enseñanza de la ciencia. Las percepciones de los investigadores universitarios. Perf. Educ. 2010;32:10–26. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brako L., Zarucchi L. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. Missouri Botanical Garden; St. Louis, MO, USA: 1993. Catalogue of the flowering plants and gymnosperms of Peru; p. 1286. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mostacero J., Castillo F., Mejía F., Gamarra O., Charcape J., Ramírez R. Plantas Medicinales del Perú: Taxonomía, Ecogeografía, Fenología y Etnobotánica. Asamblea Nacional de Rectores Fondo Editorial; Trujillo, Peru: 2011. p. 909. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mostacero J., Mejía F., Zelada W., Medina C. Biogeografía del Perú. Asamblea Nacional de Rectores Fondo Editorial; Trujillo, Peru: 2007. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weberbauer A. El Mundo Vegetal de Los Andes Peruanos. Estación Experimental Agraria La Molina, Ministerio de Agricultura; Lima, Peru: 1945. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- 29.Macbride J.F. Flora of Peru. Volume 13 Field Museum Botanical History; Chicago, IL, USA: 1936. (Botanical Series). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schmidt-Przewoźna K., Brandys A. Utilization of Contaminated Lands for Cultivation of Dye Producing Plants. Bioremediat. Bioecon. 2016 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802830-8.00014-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]




