Abstract
Background
We previously showed in a prospective study that rituximab appears to be effective in some children and adolescents with severe chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Eleven of 36 patients achieved and maintained platelet counts over 50,000/mm3 within the first 12 weeks. These patients were followed for the next year.
Methods
Platelet counts were monitored monthly and all subsequent bleeding manifestations and need for further treatment was noted.
Results
Eight of the 11 initial responders maintained a platelet count over 150,000/mm3 without further treatment intervention. Three patients had a late relapse. One initial non-responder achieved a remission after 16 weeks, and two additional patients maintained platelet counts around 50,000/mm3 without the need for further intervention.
Conclusions
Rituximab resulted in sustained efficacy with platelet counts of 50,000/mm3 or higher in 11 of 36 patients (31%).
Keywords: clinical trial, immune thrombocytopenia, rituximab
INTRODUCTION
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is usually self-limited in children, but a subgroup of patients will develop chronic ITP (of more than 6 months duration) associated with clinically significant bleeding manifestations [1–3]. Treatment options include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), anti-D immunoglobulin, or chemotherapeutic agents, such as vincristine or cyclophosphamide [4–6]. Recently, Bennett et al. [7] demonstrated the safety and efficacy of rituximab for the treatment of such children. Eleven of 36 patients with severe, chronic ITP responded within 1–7 weeks to three or four doses of rituximab, by maintaining their platelet count over 50,000/mm3 for at least 12 weeks [7]. The follow-up of these children 1 year later is reported here by determining the sustainability of the response at the 150,000/mm3 and the 50,000/mm3 levels.
METHODS
The study protocol has been previously described in detail [7,8]. In short, ten clinical sites and a data-coordinating center (Supplemental Appendix) participated in this study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the participating institutions.
ITP was defined by the criteria developed by Buchanan and Adix [9], and Evans’ Syndrome was defined as ITP with evidence of autoimmune hemolytic anemia with positive direct antiglobulin test. Patients were eligible if they suffered from severe, chronic ITP (either primary or secondary), were between 18 months to 18 years of age at enrollment and had a platelet count of less than 30,000/mm3 at screening (for more details see Refs. [7,8]). Rituximab (anti-CD20, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA/Biogen, Cambridge, MA/IDEC, San Diego, CA) was given as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 375 mg/m2 weekly for four doses. Treatment success defined as a sustained platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3 during four consecutive weeks starting during weeks 9–12, was achieved by 11 of 36 patients (31%) with a median time to response of 1 week (range 1–7 weeks).
All patients were followed for at least 1 year. Any bleeding episodes or further interventions were noted, and platelet counts were obtained monthly. A sustained response was defined as a platelet count over 150,000/mm3 without further intervention during the observation phase. A partial response was defined as a platelet count over 50,000/mm3 without further intervention. Relapse was defined as an initial platelet count >150,000 cells/mm3 that later declined and necessitated further treatment.
Statistics
Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to assess the association of persistent response to rituximab with various demographic and clinical factors. SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all computations.
RESULTS
All 36 patients were evaluable. Of the 11 patients previously defined as responders (4 males and 7 females, age range 7.5–17.4 years; Table I), 8 maintained a platelet count >150,000/mm3 for the whole study duration (Fig. 1a).
TABLE I.
Comparison of Patients With Sustained Response to Rituximab, Those Who Relapsed After Improvement at 12 Weeks, and Non-Responders*
| Sustained response | Relapse | Non-responders | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Subjects | 8 | 3 | 25 |
| Race | |||
| White | 8 (100) | 0 (0) | 20 (80) |
| Black | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | 1 (4) |
| Other | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (16) |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 3 (38) | 1 (33) | 17 (68) |
| Female | 5 (62) | 2 (67) | 8 (32) |
| Age, years | 12.5 (7.5–17.4) | 12.4 (7.9–16.9) | 10.6 (2.6–18.3) |
| Prior to trial | |||
| Duration of ITP, years | 4.3 (0.6–11.6) | 5.8 (1.4–9.5) | 3.9 (0.6–12.1) |
| Number of treatments | 4.4 (3–8) | 4.7 (3–6) | 4.0 (2–7) |
| Responsea | |||
| Steroids | 8 (100) | 3 (100) | 16 (64) |
| IVIG | 6 (75) | 3 (100) | 19 (86) |
| Anti-D | 3 (60) | 1 (100) | 17 (81) |
| Splenectomy | 1 (13) | 2 (67) | 4 (16) |
| Refractory | 5 (63) | 3 (100) | 19 (76) |
| During trial | |||
| Early response | 8 (100) | 2 (67) | 1 (4) |
| Bleeding episodes, grade 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Bleeding episodes, grade 3 | 6 | 6 | 54 |
| Splenectomy | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 5 (20) |
Shown are n (%) or mean (minimum–maximum);
Among those receiving the indicated treatment.
Fig. 1.
Platelet levels during observation time. Rituximab infusions were administered weekly × 4 during the first month. a: Responders with a sustained response thru week 52. b: Initial responders who later relapsed. c: Initial non-responders who attained and maintained response thru week 52. Dashed line indicates target platelet count, 50,000/mm3. Arrows indicate treatment for low platelet count or bleeding; see text for details.
Three patients with an initial response relapsed later (Fig. 1b). One patient had a late decrease in platelet count to 113,000/mm3 and was treated for severe bleeding prompting therapy with amicar and solumedrol. A second patient had brief decreases in platelet count fell to 23,000/mm3 at week 39 and 4,000/mm3 at week 49 but did not receive additional treatment. A third patient relapsed at week 32 with a platelet count of 7,000/mm3, received intravenous immunoglobulin, and then maintained platelet counts around 50,000/mm3 without further intervention.
Three patients initially classified as non-responders later improved (Fig. 1c). One whose platelet count at week 12 was 4,000/mm3 recovered after an additional dose of IVIG and methylprednisolone and maintained a platelet count over 50,000/mm3 thereafter without the need for further treatment. Another who was still receiving steroids at week 12 maintained a platelet count >50,000/mm3 without steroid therapy until week 38, then experienced a decline to 33,000/mm3 but recovered without further treatment after a short course of steroids. A third patient reached a platelet count of 56,000/mm3 at the end of the evaluation period and stayed close to that level thru week 52.
Six patients had Evans syndrome. Two were non-responders, two relapsed (one of them, as described above, developed severe bleeding symptoms at a platelet count of 113,000/mm3) and two maintained a normal platelet count.
The bleeding score [7] was generally low in patients with sustained response (see Table I). No grade 4 bleeding occurred, while grade 3 bleeding was observed in three patients. All of the eight Caucasian responders maintained their response, whereas all three African-American responders relapsed (P =0.006). No other factor (gender, age, Hispanic ethnicity, previous treatment history or rapidity of response to rituximab) predicted a sustained response (P >0.15).
Five of the 25 initial non-responders underwent a splenectomy after week 12. In two this was successful (platelets within normal range without further intervention) and three continue to need occasional treatment with steroids. No adverse events related to study medication were reported after week 12. Immunoglobulin levels were consistently abnormal in two patients. One patient had persistently low IgG (708 mg/dl initially, 508 mg/dl at week 52), IgM and IgA and another developed low IgM levels at week 12, and later also developed low IgG (decrease from 995 mg/dl at baseline to 581 mg/dl at weeks 28 and 52) and IgA levels. None of the patients had infections related to a decreased immune response.
DISCUSSION
Rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, was initially licensed for B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, but has since been used for other indications, including immune thrombocytopenia [7,10–17]. The early results of this prospective study of rituximab in childhood and adolescent ITP showed an encouraging response rate of over 30% in patients with previously treatment-refractory disease [7]. The longer follow-up presented in this report demonstrates that most children (72%) who initially respond to rituximab will maintain their platelet count in an accepted and considered range (i.e., over 50,000/mm3) without further intervention and with no or only minimal bleeding symptoms. This is very similar to the results obtained by Wang et al. [16], in which an overall sustained response in 9 of 24 children (37%), including 9 of 15 (60%) initial responders was reported.
After 1 year of follow-up none of the patients had severe infectious episodes despite the decrease in B cells and immunoglobulin levels in a few patients. By the end of the study, 12 of 36 children (33%) had undergone splenectomy, seven before entering the study and 5 after they did not respond to treatment with rituximab.
Rituximab appears to offer a safe treatment option for children with severe, treatment-refractory ITP resulting in sustained responses in some patients, but continued follow-up is necessary especially in children who have not yet normalized their platelet counts.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Grant sponsor: General Clinical Research Centers at the Baylor College of Medicine (GCRC); Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: M01RR000188; Grant sponsor: Children’s Hospital, Boston (GCRC); Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: M01RR002172; Grant sponsor: University of California, Los Angeles (GCRG); Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: M01RR000865; Grant sponsor: Weill Medical College at Cornell University; Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: M01-RR000047; Grant sponsor: Pediatric Clinical Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco; Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: M01RR-001271; Grant sponsor: Lita Annenberg Hazen Foundation, University of California, Los Angeles.
We would like to thank all the participants (patients, families and staff) for their contributions to this study. This study was supported by grants from an anonymous donor to the Boston Center for Genetic and Acquired Blood Disease, by the Glaser Pediatric Research Network, and by Genentech/Biogen-Idec. Additional support was provided by General Clinical Research Centers at the Baylor College of Medicine, (GCRC grant No. M01RR000188), Children’s Hospital, Boston (GCRC No. M01RR002172), the University of California, Los Angeles, (GCRG No. M01RR000865) and Weill Medical College at Cornell University (M01-RR000047) and the Pediatric Clinical Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco (Grant No M01-RR-001271). Support was also provided by the Lita Annenberg Hazen Foundation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Footnotes
A complete list of the members of the Rituximab/ITP Study Group and the Glaser Pediatric Research Network appears on-line as supplemental material.
Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Kuhne T, Buchanan GR, Zimmerman S, et al. A prospective comparative study of 2540 infants and children with newly diagnosed idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) from the Intercontinental Childhood ITP Study Group. J Pediatr. 2003;143:605–608. doi: 10.1067/s0022-3476(03)00535-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Neunert CE, Bright BC, Buchanan GR. Severe chronic refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura during childhood: A survey of physician management. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 doi: 10.1002/pbc.21621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blanchette V, Bolton-Maggs P. Childhood immune thrombocytopenic purpura: Diagnosis and management. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008;55:393–420. ix. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abrams RA, Aster R, Anderson T. Intravenous gammaglobulin in refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura: Efficacy with or without concomitant steroid therapy. Am J Hematol. 1985;18:85–89. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830180111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hollenberg JP, Subak LL, Ferry JJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of splenectomy versus intravenous gamma globulin in treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura in childhood. J Pediatr. 1988;112:530–539. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80163-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bussel JB, Graziano JN, Kimberly RP, et al. Intravenous anti-D treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura: Analysis of efficacy, toxicity, and mechanism of effect. Blood. 1991;77:1884–1893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bennett CM, Rogers ZR, Kinnamon DD, et al. Prospective phase 1/2 study of rituximab in childhood and adolescent chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood. 2006;107:2639–2642. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fox RA, Neufeld EJ, Bennett CM. Rituximab for adolescents with haemophilia and high titre inhibitors. Haemophilia. 2006;12:218–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01215.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Buchanan GR, Adix L. Grading of hemorrhage in children with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Pediatr. 2002;141:683–688. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.128547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Coiffier B, Haioun C, Ketterer N, et al. Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) for the treatment of patients with relapsing or refractory aggressive lymphoma: A multicenter phase II study. Blood. 1998;92:1927–1932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zompi S, Tulliez M, Conti F, et al. Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) for the treatment of patients with clonal lymphoproliferative disorders after orthotopic liver transplantation: A report of three cases. J Hepatol. 2000;32:521–527. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80406-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stasi R, Pagano A, Stipa E, et al. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment for adults with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood. 2001;98:952–957. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.4.952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zecca M, De Stefano P, Nobili B, et al. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of severe, immune-mediated, pure red cell aplasia and hemolytic anemia. Blood. 2001;97:3995–3997. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.12.3995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aggarwal A, Catlett JP. Rituximab: An anti-CD20 antibody for the treatment of chronic refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura. South Med J. 2002;95:1209–1212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cooper N, Stasi R, Cunningham-Rundles S, et al. The efficacy and safety of B-cell depletion with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol. 2004;125:232–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang J, Wiley JM, Luddy R, et al. Chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children: Assessment of rituximab treatment. J Pediatr. 2005;146:217–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Taube T, von Stackelberg A, Schulte-Overberg U, et al. Chronic immune thrombocytopentic purpura in children: Assessment of rituximab treatment. J Pediatr. 2006;148:423. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

