Synopsis
The sinonasal epithelial barrier is comprised of tight and adherens junction proteins. Disruption of epithelial barrier function has been hypothesized to contribute to allergic disease such as allergic rhinitis through increased passage of antigens and exposure of underlying tissue to these stimuli. Several mechanisms of sinonasal epithelial barrier disruption include antigen proteolytic activity, inflammatory cytokine-mediated tight junction breakdown, or exacerbation from environmental stimuli. Mechanisms of sinonasal epithelial barrier stabilization include corticosteroids and nuclear erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) cytoprotective pathway activation. Additional studies will aid in determining the contribution of epithelial barrier function in allergic rhinitis pathophysiology and treatment.
Keywords: allergic rhinitis, epithelial permeability, house dust mite, sinonasal barrier dysfunction, tight junctions
Introduction
The sinonasal airway is at the gateway between the external airborne environment and the human body. As an initial contact point during inhalation, the sinonasal airway serves multiple roles including thermoregulation, moisturization, removal of airborne particles, and response to infectious agents1. Infectious airborne stimuli are combatted by innate immune mechanisms including mucociliary clearance, bitter taste receptors, sinonasal epithelial barrier function, and innate immune effector cells2–4.
The sinonasal airway is bombarded on a daily basis with a host of noxious stimuli, some of which may be allergenic. An allergic response to inhaled stimuli can cause an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated inflammatory response characterized by symptoms including rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing, and congestion5. This response is known as allergic rhinitis (AR) and is one of the most common human ailments. Indeed, the prevalence of AR has been estimated to be 10–20% in the United States6. A diagnosis of AR is obtained by patient history, confirmation of an IgE-mediated mechanism through skin-prick or serum testing, and an allergic response to the known trigger7. Allergic rhinitis is classified based on the temporal exposure of the allergenic trigger as seasonal, episodic, or perennial as well as by the frequency and severity of symptoms5. Common known triggers include antigens such as dust mite, pollen, grass, tree, and pets. Current empiric therapeutic strategies include intranasal steroids, anti-histamines, and exposure control. Those patients who do not have an adequate response may also consider immunotherapy as an effective treatment option5, 8.
There has been significant interest in the role the sinonasal epithelial barrier plays in sinonasal disease such as AR (Figure 1)2, 9–10. This barrier is created between sinonasal epithelial cells via apical transmembrane and scaffold protein interactions including tight junction proteins such as zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), claudin family members, occludin, and junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A). Adherens junction proteins such as epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) create intercellular interactions. Together, these junction proteins function to limit intercellular passage of fluid and protect the underlying tissue from exposure to noxious and allergenic stimuli. Dysfunction of epithelial barrier function has been hypothesized to contribute to allergic disease through allowing increased passage of antigens and exposure of underlying tissue to these stimuli. The purpose of this review is to investigate the current understanding of the role of the sinonasal epithelial barrier in allergic rhinitis.
Figure 1.
The sinonasal barrier is comprised of a variety of tight and adherens cell junction proteins. Destabilization of these protein interactions occurs via direct proteolysis or through stimulation of intracellular signaling mechanisms resulting in increased epithelial permeability. The sinonasal epithelium also secretes inflammatory cytokines including TSLP, IL-25, and IL-33 which propagate additional inflammatory pathways and Th2-mediated inflammation.
Adapted from London NR Jr, Tharakan A, Ramanathan M Jr. The Role of Innate Immunity and Aeroallergens in Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2016;79:69–77; with permission.
Epithelial barrier function in atopic disease
Epithelial barrier dysfunction has been linked to chronic inflammatory disease of multiple organ systems including atopic dermatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). For example, single nucleotide polymorphisms in claudin-1, protocadherin-1, and E-cadherin have been linked to atopic dermatitis, asthma, and Crohn’s disease11–13. Decreased claudin-18 expression has been reported in asthmatic patients and claudin-18 knockout mice demonstrate significantly increased airway responsiveness following intranasal aspergillus sensitization14. Decreased barrier function and decreased expression of ZO-1, claudin-1, and occludin have been noted in biopsy specimens from patients with CRS with nasal polyps15–16. Thus epithelial barrier dysfunction has been linked to chronic inflammatory disease through multiple lines of evidence.
Screening studies using microarray gene expression, RNA-seq, and nasal mucus proteomics have suggested a role for barrier dysfunction in AR17–19. These findings are supported by multiple studies reporting decreased sinonasal epithelial cell junction protein expression in allergic rhinitis. Lee et al. reported decreased ZO-1 and E-cadherin expression in the nasal epithelium of patients with AR20. Consistent with these findings, Steelant et al. reported decreased ZO-1 and occludin expression as assessed by RT-qPCR and weak immunofluorescent staining in AR biopsy specimens21.
Steelant et al. have also investigated the functional consequences of barrier dysfunction in symptomatic AR21. To do so, they first obtained nasal biopsy specimens from control and house-dust mite (HDM)-AR patients. These ex vivo mucosal explants were placed in an Ussing chamber, which measures trans-tissue electrical resistance as a measurement of epithelial barrier function. Nasal mucosa explants from HDM-AR patients were found to have a statistically significant decrease in trans-tissue resistance indicating disrupted barrier function compared to control specimens21. As a means to assess epithelial barrier dysfunction to macromolecules, fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4 kilodalton (FD4) transit across ex vivo mucosal explants was also tested. This demonstrated an approximately 2-fold increase of FD4 leak across HDM-AR specimens compared to controls21. Lastly, the visual analog scale correlated inversely with major symptoms in HDM-AR but not controls.
In addition to these ex vivo results, in vitro studies have also been suggestive of barrier disruption in AR. Nasal epithelial cells isolated from inferior turbinates and grown on an air liquid interface in culture for 21 days demonstrated a baseline decrease in barrier function as demonstrated by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and FD4 transit compared to control samples. Furthermore, these cells grown in culture demonstrated decreased expression of ZO-1 and occludin as assessed by RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence21. Lee et al. reported decreased E-cadherin expression in cultured cells from AR compared to control stimulated with interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-5 (IL-5), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)20. Collectively, these results suggest that permanent changes in barrier function occur to sinonasal epithelial cells in AR that are perpetuated in culture.
Disruption of barrier function in AR may occur through multiple mechanisms
Mechanisms of sinonasal barrier disruption have been described including allergen proteolytic activity and inflammatory cytokine-mediated disruption. One well described example of proteolytic activity is the house dust mite cysteine proteinase antigen Der p 122. Der p 1 has been reported to cleave extracellular domain sites in occludin and in claudin-1 resulting in increased epithelial permeability and Der p 1 transit through the epithelial barrier22. Furthermore, Der p 1 has been shown to cause a time-dependent breakdown of tight junctions as well as ZO-1 mis-localization from tight junctions23. Inhibition of the protease activity of Der p 1 as a therapeutic strategy for reducing HDM-induced barrier dysfunction has been reported24.
Multiple inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in AR pathogenesis including interleukin-33 (IL-33), an IL-1-like cytokine constitutively expressed in the nucleus of nasal epithelial cells. Upon secretion from nasal epithelial cells, IL-33 is known to incite a Th2 response. Increased IL-33 expression has been found in the serum of AR patients and a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) association reported in IL-33 and AR25. In order to test the necessity of IL-33 in AR pathogenesis, Haenuki et al. developed IL-33 knockout mice and a ragweed murine model of AR in which mice are subjected to intranasal instillation of ragweed pollen after intraperitoneal sensitization26. Using the ragweed model, IL-33 knockout mice demonstrated decreased eosinophil accumulation, decreased ability to mount an IgE response, as well as decreased cytokine expression IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 compared to controls26. These effects in IL-33 knockout mice were reversed when IL-33 knockout mice were exposed to ragweed pollen and recombinant IL-3326.
Interleukin-33 has been demonstrated to act on type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) which in turn have recently been reported to disrupt bronchial epithelial barrier integrity through interleukin-13 (IL-13) release27. In this study, human bronchial epithelial cells were grown at an air liquid interface and ILC2s were applied basolaterally. A significant disruption in epithelial barrier function was evidenced by decreased transepithelial electrical resistance and increased FITC-dextran leak27. While IL-33 administration alone was not sufficient to disrupt barrier function, IL-33 administration in combination with ILC2s led to a significant exacerbation of ILC2-mediated leak. Decreased barrier integrity was significantly improved with anti-IL-13 treatment, suggesting an IL-13-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, intranasal administration of IL-33 in control but not ILC2 deficient mice increased barrier disruption as assessed by α2-macroglobulin and transferrin in bronchoalveolar lavage samples27. Occludin and ZO-1 expression was also disrupted by IL-33 administration as measured by decreased immunofluorescence and mRNA expression in control but not ILC2 deficient mice27. Lastly, in vivo intranasal administration of IL-13 was sufficient to disrupt bronchial epithelial cell integrity as evidenced by increased α2-macroglobulin and transferrin levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
Particulate matter may exacerbate AR in animal models
Another potential mechanism of sinonasal barrier breakdown and subsequent exacerbation of atopic disease is via particulate matter (PM) exposure. Indeed, the documented harmful effects of PM on human health are pervasive and include cardiovascular disease, aggravation of chronic respiratory disease, and premature death28. Particulate matter contains redox-active chemicals and transition metals and may exert its disruptive effects through the generation of reactive oxygen species29. To test whether PM can cause sinonasal epithelial barrier dysfunction in vitro, sinonasal epithelial cells grown at an air-liquid interface were exposed to PM. Four hours after exposure there was a significant decrease in barrier function as assessed by a reduction in TEER and increased paracellular flux of FD429. Furthermore, the cell surface localization of ZO-1, JAM-A, and occludin were found to be reduced after PM exposure as assessed by immunofluorescence29.
To test the effects of inhalation of airborne fine particulate matter, mice were exposed to concentrated particulate matter for 16 weeks. The concentration used was ~60 micrograms per cubic meter which is lower than that reported in some major global cities30. Using this in vivo model, a significant increase in serum albumin accumulation in nasal lavage fluid was observed indicative of barrier dysfunction30. Furthermore, immunofluorescence against E-cadherin and claudin-1 in sinonasal mucosa of mice exposed to concentrated PM demonstrated decreased E-cadherin and claudin-1 expression. In addition to barrier disruption, a significant increase in inflammation was reported including macrophage, neutrophil, and eosinophil accumulation as well as increased expression of IL-13 and eotaxin-130. While the exact mechanism of action has yet to be determined, these observational studies demonstrate that chronic inhalation of PM in vivo is sufficient to cause non-allergic eosinophilic inflammation.
To determine whether inhaled pollutants may exacerbate AR in vivo, Fukuoka et al. pre-treated mice with intransal diesel-exhaust particles (DEP) prior to ragweed pollen challenge31. They observed increased sneezing after DEP pre-treatment compared to controls, indicative of exacerbation of AR symptoms. DEP treatment was found to disrupt ZO-1 expression in nasal mucosa in vivo as well as in RPMI 2650 cells in vitro. Lastly, antioxidant treatment inhibited DEP-induced epithelial junction disruption and sneezing exacerbation, suggestive of an oxidative stress mechanism of action for DEP31.
Stabilizing the epithelial barrier
As there is evidence that epithelial barrier disruption contributes to AR, one may hypothesize that stabilizing the epithelial barrier may therefore improve AR. Using the nasal explant system, Steelant et al. reported that HDM-AR patients who used intranasal steroids were found to have significantly higher transepithelial electrical resistance and decreased flux of FD4 across the epithelial barrier21. Furthermore, these explants had a higher expression of ZO-1 and occluding than control. Interestingly, when nasal epithelial cells were cultured in vitro at an air liquid interface, fluticasone treatment alone significantly improved epithelial barrier function as assessed by TEER and FD4 paracellular flux21. Fluticasone treatment also increased expression of ZO-1 and occludin21. Futhermore, fluticasone pre-treatment reduced IL-4-induced epithelial barrier dysfunction. Lastly, the improved baseline barrier function with fluticasone was negated in vitro by pre-treatment with a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist21. Thus glucocorticoids may stabilize sinonasal epithelial barrier function.
One potential target for stabilization of the epithelial barrier is the nuclear erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) cytoprotective pathway. Upon activation, Nrf2 translocates to the nucleus and increases expression of cytoprotective genes29. One known activator of the Nrf2 pathway is the small molecule sulforaphane (SFN). Sinonasal epithelial cells pre-treated with SFN had significantly reduced PM-mediated barrier disruption as assessed by TEER and FITC-dextran leak29. Furthermore, SFN pre-treatment decreased PM-mediated disruption of ZO-1, JAM-A, and Claudin-1 in vitro. In a similar manner, SFN has been reported to improve cigarette-smoke extract and HDM-induced disruption of sinonasal epithelial barrier function and ZO-1 expression32–33. Future in vivo studies will help to elucidate the importance of the Nrf2 pathway in vivo.
Propagation of Th2 inflammation by epithelial derived cytokines
The sinonasal epithelium also acts to exacerbate allergic rhinitis through secretion of inflammatory cytokines including thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin-25 (IL-25), and IL-3334. These cytokines act on surrounding cells including ILC2s which in turn secrete IL-4, IL-5, and IL-132. These downstream cytokines act to instigate a Th2-mediated response and recruit additional inflammatory cells such as eosinophils. Broad neutralization of these downstream cytokines has been reported to significantly reduce eosinophil accumulation and plasma protein exudates in a murine ovalbumin model of allergic rhinitis35. Furthermore, ILC2s may interact directly with T cells to stimulate T cell activation2, 36. Thus epithelial derived cytokines may instigate a chain reaction of signaling pathways contributing to the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis.
The importance of sinonasal epithelial derived cytokines has been investigated in murine acute and chronic models of allergic rhinitis. One study found decreased Th2 activation (as assessed by increased IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 production) as well as nasal eosinophilia in IL-33−/− mice when ragweed pollen was administered intranasally in an acute but not chronic model of allergic rhinitis37. Interestingly, while TSLP receptor (TSLPR)-deficient mice did not demonstrate a significant reduction in Th2 activation and nasal eosinophilia in the ragweed model, a significant decrease in serum ragweed-specific IgE levels and sneezing response was observed37. In a murine model of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis characterized by chronic ovalbumin exposure combined with Staphylococcal enterotoxin B, neutralization of IL-25 significantly reduced eosinophil accumulation, and nasal polyp formation. Thus TSLP, IL-25, and IL-33 may be necessary for propagating differing aspects of Th2-mediated inflammation in allergen mediated sinonasal inflammation38.
Conclusion
The sinonasal airway is at the gateway between the external airborne environment and the human body. Epithelial barrier dysfunction has been linked to chronic inflammatory disease of multiple organ systems including atopic dermatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Disruption of epithelial barrier function has been hypothesized to contribute to allergic disease such as allergic rhinitis through increased passage of antigens and exposure of underlying tissue to these stimuli. Mechanisms of epithelial barrier destabilization presented here include proteolytic activity of the HDM Der p 1, IL-33 interplay with ILC2s to increase IL-13 expression, and exacerbation with PM or DEP. Future studies will help to understand the importance of barrier disruption in AR and whether barrier stabilization may improve AR pathophysiology.
Key points.
The sinonasal epithelial barrier is at the interface between the external airborne environment and the underlying tissue. This barrier is comprised of tight junction and adherens junction proteins.
Barrier dysfunction has been hypothesized to contribute to allergic disease such as allergic rhinitis through increased passage of antigens and exposure of underlying tissue to these stimuli.
Mechanisms of sinonasal epithelial barrier disruption may include antigen proteolytic activity, inflammatory cytokine-mediated tight junction breakdown, or exacerbation from environmental stimuli such as particulate matter or diesel exhaust.
Mechanisms of sinonasal epithelial barrier stabilization include corticosteroids and nuclear erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) cytoprotective pathway activation.
Future studies will help to elucidate the importance of barrier disruption in allergic rhinitis (AR) and whether barrier stabilization may improve AR pathophysiology.
Footnotes
Disclosure statement: The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Beule AG. Physiology and pathophysiology of respiratory mucosa of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;9:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/cto000071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.London NR, Lane AP. Innate immunity and chronic rhinosinusitis: What we have learned from animal models. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2016;1(3):49–56. doi: 10.1002/lio2.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee RJ, et al. Bitter and sweet taste receptors regulate human upper respiratory innate immunity. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(3):1393–405. doi: 10.1172/JCI72094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carey RM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus triggers nitric oxide production in human upper airway epithelium. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(9):808–813. doi: 10.1002/alr.21568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seidmen MD, et al. Clinical practice guideline: allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(1S):S1–S43. doi: 10.1177/0194599814561600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mims JW. Epidemiology of allergic rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(S2):S 18–20. doi: 10.1002/alr.21385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hellings PW, et al. Positioning the Principles of Precision Medicine in Care Pathways for Allergic Rhinitis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis - an EUFOREA-ARIA-EPOS-AIRWAYS ICP statement. Allergy. 2017 doi: 10.1111/all.13162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lin SY, et al. Sublingual immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma: a systematic review. JAMA. 2013;309(12):1278–1288. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.London NR, Tharakan A, Ramanathan M. The Role of Innate Immunity and Aeroallergens in Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;79:69–77. doi: 10.1159/000445132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Steelant B, et al. Restoring airway epithelial barrier dysfunction: a new therapeutic challenge in allergic airway disease. Rhinology. 2016;54(3):195–205. doi: 10.4193/Rhino15.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De Benedetto A, et al. Tight junction defects in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):773–786. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mortensen LJ, et al. The PCDH1 gene and asthma in early childhood. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(3):792–800. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00021613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Muise AM, et al. Polymorphisms in E-cadherin (CDH1) result in a mis-localised cytoplasmic protein that is associated with Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2009;58(8):1121–1127. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.175117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sweerus K, et al. Claudin-18 deficiency is associated with airway epithelial barrier dysfunction and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(1):72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.02.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rogers GA, et al. Epithelial tight junction alterations in nasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(1):50–54. doi: 10.1002/alr.20014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Soyka MB, et al. Defective epithelial barrier in chronic rhinosinusitis: the regulation of tight junctions by IFN-γ and IL-4. 2012;130(5):1087–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wagener AH, et al. The impact of allergic rhinitis and asthma on human nasal and bronchial epithelial gene expression. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tomazic PV, et al. Nasal mucus proteomic changes reflect altered immune responses and epithelial permeability in patients with allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(3):741–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ahuja SK, et al. Preservation of epithelial cell barrier function and muted inflammation in resistance to allergic rhinoconjunctivitis from house dust mite challenge. 2017;139(3):844–854. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee HJ, et al. Decreased expression of E-cadherin and ZO-1 in the nasal mucosa of patients with allergic rhinitis: altered regulation of E-cadherin by IL-4, IL-5, and TNF-alpha. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016;30(3):173–178. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Steelant B, et al. Impaired barrier function in patients with house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis is accompanied by decreased occludin and zonula occludens-1 expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(4):1043–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wan H, et al. Der p 1 facilitates transepithelial allergen delivery by disruption of tight junctions. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(1):123–133. doi: 10.1172/JCI5844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wan H, et al. Quantitative structural and biochemical analyses of tight junction dynamics following exposure of epithelial cells to house dust mite allergen Der p 1. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30(5):685–698. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.John RJ, et al. Functional effects of the inhibition of the cysteine protease activity of the major house dust mite allergen Der p 1 by a novel peptide-based inhibitor. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30(6):784–793. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sakashita M, et al. Association of serum interleukin-33 level and the interleukin-33 genetic variant with Japanese cedar pollinosis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(12):1875–1881. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03114.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Haenuki Y, et al. A critical role of IL-33 in experimental allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(1):184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sugita K, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells disrupt bronchial epithelial barrier integrity by targeting tight junctions through IL-13 in asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.038. S0091-6749(17)30572-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim KH, Kabir E, Kabir S. A review on the human health impact of airborne particulate matter. Environ Int. 2015;74:136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.London NR, et al. Air pollutant-mediated disruption of sinonasal epithelial cell barrier function is reversed by activation of the Nrf2 pathway. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(6):1736–1738. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ramanathan M, et al. Airborne particulate matter induces non-allergic eosinophilic sinonasal inflammation in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017 doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-03510C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fukuoka A, et al. Diesel exhaust particles exacerbate allergic rhinitis in mice by disrupting the nasal epithelial barrier. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016;46(1):142–152. doi: 10.1111/cea.12597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tharakan A, et al. Reversal of cigarette smoke extract-induced sinonasal epithelial cell barrier dysfunction through Nrf2 activation. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(11):1145–1150. doi: 10.1002/alr.21827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.London NR, et al. Nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 activation inhibits house dust mite-induced sinonasal epithelial cell barrier dysfunction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(5):536–541. doi: 10.1002/alr.21916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Divekar R, Kita H. Recent advances in epithelium-derived cytokines (IL-33, IL-25, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin) and allergic inflammation. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;15(1):98–103. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sanden C, et al. Broad Th2 neutralization and anti-inflammatory action of pentosane polysulfate sodium in experimental allergic rhinitis. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2017 doi: 10.1002/iid3.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vreugde S, Wormald PJ. Innate lymphoid type 2 cells in chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;16(1):7–12. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Akasaki S, et al. Murine allergic rhinitis and nasal Th2 activation are mediated via TSLP- and IL-33-signaling pathways. Int Immunol. 2016;28(2):65–76. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxv055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shin HW, et al. IL-25 as a novel therapeutic target in nasal polyps of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(6):1476–1485. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

