Abstract
Neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) is the formation of ectopic bone generally in muscles surrounding joints following spinal cord or brain injury. We investigated the mechanisms of NHO formation in 64 patients and a mouse model of spinal cord injury–induced NHO. We show that marrow from human NHOs contains hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niches, in which mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and endothelial cells provide an environment supporting HSC maintenance, proliferation, and differentiation. The transcriptomic signature of MSCs from NHOs shows a neuronal imprinting associated with a molecular network required for HSC support. We demonstrate that oncostatin M (OSM) produced by activated macrophages promotes osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization of human muscle-derived stromal cells surrounding NHOs. The key role of OSM was confirmed using an experimental model of NHO in mice defective for the OSM receptor (OSMR). Our results provide strong evidence that macrophages contribute to NHO formation through the osteogenic action of OSM on muscle cells within an inflammatory context and suggest that OSM/OSMR could be a suitable therapeutic target. Altogether, the evidence of HSCs in ectopic bones growing at the expense of soft tissue in spinal cord/brain-injured patients indicates that inflammation and muscle contribute to HSC regulation by the brain-bone-blood triad.
Keywords: Bone Biology, Hematology
Keywords: Bone development, Hematopoietic stem cells, Muscle
Macrophage-derived Oncostatin M contributes to the development of heterotopic ossification with hematopoietic niches following brain/spinal cord injuries in human and in a mouse model.
Introduction
Heterotopic ossifications (HOs) are characterized by the formation of ectopic bone in soft tissues surrounding joints: particularly the hip, knee, elbow, or shoulder. Genetic hereditary forms of HOs, such as fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) (1–4), are extremely rare (1:2,000,000 prevalence). However, HOs can have a much higher incidence following severe trauma, such as traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries (SCIs), stroke and cerebral anoxia (neurogenic HO [NHO]) (5), fractures, or extended severe burns.
Patients with HOs suffer from pain and highly reduced range of motion from affected joints, leading to complete ankyloses on affected joints. Currently, the only effective treatment for HOs is surgical resection, but this is only temporarily effective, since HOs can reoccur, even 15 years after resection (6). Furthermore, complications associated with resection occur when ossifications entrap large blood vessels and nerves. A better understanding of HO etiology is required to develop more lasting treatments or a cure (7).
Hematopoietic marrow-like tissue has been observed in the center of HOs on histological sections, as described in two case reports (8, 9). Recently, the presence of clonogenic hematopoietic progenitors associated with histologically defined stromal cells has been reported in HOs from severe combat-injured orthopedic patients (10). Likewise, in a mouse model of SCI-induced NHO, which we recently developed, hematopoietic marrow-like tissue was observed in the center of NHOs (11). However, we believe that until now, the presence of a hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niche, defined by functional HSCs, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), and endothelial cells (12), has never been demonstrated in NHO marrow.
Osteogenic precursor cells are necessary for ectopic osteogenesis in soft tissues (13). Cells from several origins have been proposed to be implicated in the formation of ectopic bones in traumatic or hereditary HOs (14). First, circulating osteogenic precursors have been reported to contribute to HO formation in patients with FOP (15), confirming a previous report in a mouse model in which ectopic ossification was induced by collagen implants containing exogenous recombinant BMP-2 (16). Second, resident muscle cells with osteogenic differentiation capacity have also been proposed. Indeed, Tie2+PDGFRα+Sca-1+ progenitors that reside in the murine skeletal muscle interstitium generated ectopic bone in a similar BMP-2–dependent model of HO (17). Osteogenic differentiation capacity of PDGFRα+ cells isolated from healthy human skeletal muscles was confirmed in vivo when they were implanted subcutaneously on hydroxyapatite scaffolds (18). A third possible source of precursors is a cell population with a CD73+CD105+CD90+ MSC phenotype, capable of in vitro adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic (AOC) differentiation, which was isolated from combat-injured muscle from wounded military personnel; however, there is no functional in vivo study to prove that these cells were at the origin of combat injury–induced HOs (19). Moreover, the injured muscles that subsequently developed HO also demonstrated increased numbers of osteogenic progenitors (20). In contrast, Downey et al. (21) demonstrated that in healthy muscles, CD73+CD105+CD90– cells rather than CD73+CD105+CD90+ cells displayed robust AOC differentiation. Therefore, to date, the nature of osteogenic precursor cells forming HOs remains to be defined, especially in NHOs.
Several growth factors have been suggested to be involved in HO development. Among them are BMPs, a group of signaling molecules in the TGF-β superfamily that regulate bone organogenesis (22). Their participation in HO genesis was implied when intramuscular injection of BMP-9 in damaged skeletal muscles in mice induced ectopic bone formation (23). The description of animal models of HOs in which BMPs are required for induction of ectopic bone (24, 25) and the presence of a mutation in the ACVR1 gene that encodes the BMP type I receptor in FOP (1) strengthen the evidence for BMPs in the pathology of hereditary HOs such as FOP.
Apart from BMPs, others factors, including inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, could also participate in both hereditary and trauma-induced HO development (26, 27). We have recently described the triggering effect of macrophage-mediated inflammation in muscles in a SCI-induced NHO mouse model (11). Among cytokines produced by macrophages in an inflammatory context, oncostatin M (OSM) was upregulated after SCI in mice and it exhibited a neuroprotective effect against SCI or ischemic stroke (28, 29). OSM belongs to the IL-6 cytokine family, which includes IL-11, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), cardiotrophin-1, ciliary neurotrophic factor, and neuropoietin (30). OSM binds 2 receptor complexes: type I, composed of gp130 and LIF receptor subunits (31), and type II, composed of gp130 and OSM receptor (OSMR) subunits (32). OSM is secreted by hematopoietic cells, such as monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, T cells, or neutrophils (33–35), but also by osteoblasts, osteocytes, and microglia (36–38). Its secretion is increased upon stimulation by LPS, GM-CSF, or prostaglandin E2 (34, 35, 37, 39). OSM is able to stimulate the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs isolated from bone marrow (BM-MSCs) as well as from adipose tissue (39, 40) and to regulate osteoblast and osteoclast activities (33, 38). Furthermore, release of OSM by activated macrophages promotes differentiation of osteoblasts in vitro (41, 42). By playing multiple critical roles in the hematopoietic microenvironment, OSM has also been reported to participate in HSC regulation in the bone marrow (BM) (43, 44).
From a cohort of 64 patients with brain injury or SCI, we show in this study that NHOs contain functional HSC niches in which a mesenchymal and endothelial environment allows HSC maintenance, proliferation, and differentiation. Moreover, we demonstrate that activated macrophages contribute to bone formation through the osteogenic action of OSM on muscle cells within an inflammatory context. Finally, we show in a mouse model of SCI-induced NHO that we have recently developed (11) that SCI increases OSM expression in injured muscle and promotes the osteogenic potential of sorted muscle progenitor cells in vitro and that deletion of the Osmr gene reduces NHO development in vivo.
Results
Human NHOs contain functional HSCs.
In our study, 70 NHO samples from 64 patients were surgically resected and 66 of them were sectioned. Hematopoietic sites associated with osteoblasts/osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes were observed on sections of 39 of these 66 NHO biopsies (59%) after H&E staining (Figure 1A). Presence of hematopoietic cells was confirmed by FACS analysis after labeling mononuclear cells isolated from NHOs (Figure 1B). Presence of leukocytes coexpressing CD45 and CD15, CD19, or CD11/CD14 antigens indicated the existence of neutrophils, B lymphocytes, and monocytes/macrophages, respectively, in NHOs (Figure 1B). CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes were also present. Detection of CD45+CD34+ cells suggested the presence of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) (Figure 1B). The percentage of CD34+ cells in the CD45+ mononuclear cell fraction was heterogeneous but slightly lower in NHOs (2.47% ± 0.52%, n = 14) than in the BM (4.43% ± 1.22%, n = 3) from healthy donors (HD). However, the CD34+ HSPC frequency was about 20-fold higher in NHOs than in the blood from HDs (2.47% ± 0.52%, n = 14, compared with 0.110% ± 0.01%, n = 3, respectively) (Figure 1C). To analyze the presence of hematopoietic progenitor cells in CD34+ cells purified from NHOs, we performed clonogenic assays. Multipotent, erythroid, granulocytic, and macrophage progenitors could be detected in NHOs (Figure 1D) as well as progenitors of megakaryocytes (data not shown). The percentage of each colony type was similar in NHOs and in BM from HDs.
We further investigated the presence of side population (SP) cells, which are enriched in quiescent HSCs and characterized by their high capacity to efflux Hoechst33342 dye (45). As in BM, SP cells with a low Hoechst33342 fluorescence intensity could be detected in the Lin– cells isolated from NHOs (Figure 1E). The specificity of the SP population was demonstrated by its selective loss after addition of verapamil, an inhibitor of ABC transporter proteins that are responsible for Hoechst33342 efflux. A small proportion of these SP cells expressed the CD45+CD34+CD38– phenotype (Figure 1E) of immature HSPCs.
CD34+ cells isolated from human NHOs were intravenously injected into nonobese diabetic severe combined immune-deficient Il2rg–/– (NSG) mice. Eight weeks after transplantation, the engraftment capability of CD34+ cells from NHOs in NSG mice was demonstrated with the presence of human CD45+CD19+ lymphoid and CD45+CD15+ or CD45+CD11b+ myeloid cells as well as CD45+CD34+ cells in the mouse BM (Figure 1F and Supplemental Table 1). The evidence of a small population of human CD45+CD19+ cells after a secondary graft in NSG mice (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.96034DS1) definitively confirmed the presence of human HSCs in human NHOs.
Human NHOs are HSC niches with a stroma supporting in vitro and in vivo hematopoiesis.
We next studied the endothelial and mesenchymal stromal microenvironment of human NHOs and analyzed whether, as in BM from HDs, it could support functional hematopoiesis. We first investigated whether functional endothelial progenitors were detected and isolated from NHOs. Endothelial CD31+ cells were immunomagnetically separated and then sorted as CD31+CD144+CD34+CD45– cells (Figure 2A). Sorted cells were able to form colonies and grow in culture as a cobblestone monolayer, a typical morphology of endothelial cells (Figure 2B). After 1 month of culture, these cells still exhibited the CD31+CD144+CD34+CD45– endothelial cell phenotype devoid of CD45+ leukocytes (Figure 2C). CD34 antigen expression was heterogeneous on these cells and was correlated with that of the CD31 antigen. As confirmation of their endothelial phenotype, sorted cells cultured in Matrigel were able to form vascular networks (Figure 2D). Moreover, expression of adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 was increased after stimulation with proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α (Figure 2E), demonstrating the functional capabilities of endothelial cells isolated from NHOs.
We also isolated adherent stromal cells from NHOs, cultured them for 2 passages, and tested the expression of MSC markers by flow cytometry. As expected, they exhibited the classical mesenchymal CD45–CD34–CD73+CD90+CD105+ phenotype (Figure 2F). These cells were then induced to differentiate into the three AOC mesenchymal lineages using specific media, as shown by staining, confirming that adherent cells from NHOs were MSCs (NHO-MSCs; Figure 2G). The osteogenic potential of NHO-MSCs was further demonstrated by Western blot analysis showing expression of Runx2, a transcription factor required for osteoblast differentiation, and bone sialoprotein II (BSPII), a component of mineralized tissues (Figure 2H).
We then compared the transcriptomic profile of NHO-MSCs and normal BM-MSCs (GEO GSE94683). Gene set enrichment analysis performed according to a transcriptomic profile compatible with hematopoietic niche support (46) segregated NHO from BM samples. As shown in Figure 3, A and B, 45 of the 289 BM hematopoietic niche–supportive gene signatures were found overexpressed in NHO samples as compared with BM samples (Figure 3, A and B, and Supplemental Table 2). Unsupervised principal component analysis performed with BM niche–related genes that were enriched in NHO significantly discriminated NHO from BM (Figure 3C). WikiPathway database enrichment highlighted cell functionalities implicated in neuronal and glial biology, the stem cell pathway, and pathways involved in bone and cartilage metabolism, including osteopontin signaling, Wnt signaling, endochondral ossification, and matrix metalloproteinases (Figure 3D). Conjointly, analysis of curated literature demonstrated that genes related to the hematopoietic niche segregated two distinct clusters for NHO-MSCs and BM-MSCs by unsupervised classification (Euclidean distances, Figure 4A and Supplemental Table 3). This clustering was also found significant by unsupervised principal component analysis (Figure 4B). Functional enrichment analysis (WikiPathway database) performed with BM niche–related genes highlighted enrichment for genes known to be modulated after SCI (Figure 4C) in NHO-MSCs versus BM-MSCs, such as RAC1, RHOA, CDKN1B, and GDNF (Figure 4D) as well as genes essential to support hematopoiesis and HSPC development, especially KITLG (Figure 4A). The fact that KITLG is expressed at higher levels in NHO-MSCs is highly suggestive of the formation of ectopic hematopoietic niches within NHO marrows.
We further analyzed the in vitro and in vivo capability of NHO-MSCs to support functional hematopoiesis. We first demonstrated their in vitro potential to support long-term culture-initiating cell cultures (47) and their capability to maintain primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells, as a higher number of hematopoietic colonies was detected after 5 weeks of coculture compared with cultures without NHO-MSC support (Figure 3E). NHO-MSCs were also capable of inducing the SP phenotype of Lin– cells from peripheral blood (Figure 3F), as recently described with BM-MSCs (48). SP cells were CD45+CD34+, confirming their hematopoietic origin. Finally, we tested whether NHO-MSCs were able to support in vivo hematopoiesis. For this purpose, NHO-MSCs were seeded in hydroxyapatite/calcium phosphate scaffolds and implanted subcutaneously into the backs of nude mice. Ten weeks after implantation, bone tissue containing osteocytes and with hematopoietic foci was observed in implants, indicating that human NHO-MSCs support both bone formation and hematopoiesis in immunodeficient mice (Figure 3G). In contrast, no bone and hematopoietic tissue formation was observed in scaffolds implanted without NHO-MSCs (Supplemental Figure 2). Expression of specific human lamin A/C (18) in osteocytes within the heterotopic bone demonstrated that some of them were of human origin (Figure 3H), whereas, as excepted, hematopoiesis was of murine origin, similar to previous observations in mice implanted with scaffolds seeded with cultured human BM-MSCs (49). As control, murine BM sections did not exhibit any positive lamin A/C staining (Supplemental Figure 3). Therefore, human NHOs contain functional MSCs capable of forming bone tissue and supporting in vitro and in vivo hematopoiesis.
Altogether, our data demonstrate that the NHO marrow fits with the definition of a stem cell niche in which a functional mesenchymal and endothelial environment supports HSC maintenance, proliferation, and differentiation.
Muscle-derived stromal cells surrounding human NHOs exhibit osteogenic differentiation potential in response to inflammatory stimuli.
HOs are reported to develop from degenerating muscle fibers within an inflammatory context (50). Therefore, we investigated whether cells with osteogenic differentiation potential could be isolated from the surrounding muscles in which NHOs grow. After explant culture of these muscles, adherent cells from muscles surrounding NHOs were expanded by 2 passages and analyzed for phenotypic and functional characterization. Muscle-derived stromal cells (NHO-MDSCs) displayed classical MSC morphology and a CD73+CD90+CD105+ phenotypic profile (Figure 5, A and B). As expected, these cells were CD45– but heterogeneous in CD34 expression. In contrast to BM-MSCs, which were uniformly CD34–, a proportion of CD34+ cells (1.3%–17.1%) was detected in cultures of NHO-MDSCs, suggesting the presence of quiescent satellite cells (SCs) (51) within this NHO-MDSC adherent population. These NHO-MDSCs were able to differentiate into osteoblasts and adipocytes and produce cartilage glycosaminoglycan matrix when cultured in specific inductive media (Figure 5A).
We further investigated the role of inflammation in the osteogenic potential of muscle cells surrounding NHOs. We tested the response of NHO-MDSCs to an inflammatory microenvironment by adding bacterial LPSs or human TNF-α to these cultures. NHO-MDSCs demonstrated osteogenic differentiation potential when induced by osteogenic medium (OB) as compared with noninduced cells (CT), as shown by the presence of mineralized calcium deposit (Figure 5C). Here again, osteoblast differentiation was further documented by Western blot showing the expression of Runx2 and BSPII proteins (Figure 5D). This mineralization was increased when LPS or TNF-α was added to the osteogenic medium (Figure 5C). These results suggest that human NHO-MDSCs contain progenitors with osteogenic potential and that inflammatory cytokines play a role in their osteogenic differentiation.
Activated macrophages contribute to the osteogenic differentiation of human NHO-MDSCs.
Since we have previously demonstrated in mice that NHO development following SCI is triggered by macrophages infiltrating damaged muscles (11), we studied the role of macrophages in the osteogenic differentiation of human NHO-MDSCs. We first isolated CD34+ cells from human NHOs and induced them to differentiate into NHO-derived macrophages (NHOmacs) using a specific cocktail of cytokines, including human stem cell factor (SCF), thrombopoietin, Flt3-ligand (Flt3L), (IL-3), and colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) (52). After 2 weeks in culture, NHOmacs contained about 52.38% ± 12.38% (n = 6) differentiated CD45+CD11b+CD14+ macrophages that also expressed M2 macrophage polarization markers CD163 and CD206 (Figure 6A). They were then cocultured with NHO-MDSCs in osteogenic medium with or without LPS (100 ng/ml) to activate macrophages. Addition of LPS-activated NHOmacs significantly increased mineralization by NHO-MDSCs as compared with osteogenic medium alone (Figure 6B).
CD14+ monocytes/macrophages present in the mononuclear cell fraction from human NHOs (Figure 6C) were further directly isolated using CD14+ immunomagnetic separation and activated with or without LPS (100 ng/ml) for 3 days. Conditioned medium from LPS-activated CD14+ monocytes/macrophages (NHOmac CM+) or from nonactivated CD14+ monocytes/macrophages (NHOmac CM–) was recovered and diluted at 1:10 in osteogenic medium. NHOmac CM+ strongly and significantly stimulated mineralization of NHO-MDSCs compared with the OB condition (Figure 6D).
Altogether our results indicate that LPS-activated monocytes/macrophages contribute to the mineralization and osteogenic differentiation of NHO-MDSCs through soluble factor production.
Macrophage-derived OSM is involved in human NHO formation.
Taking into account the role of activated monocytes/macrophages in the osteogenic differentiation of NHO-MDSCs, we further analyzed whether inflammatory cytokines produced by activated monocytes/macrophages were involved in this osteogenic effect. Among these cytokines, OSM has been reported to promote osteogenesis in MSCs through activation of its receptor (38, 39). We therefore analyzed the local production of OSM in NHOs. Figure 7A shows the expression of OSM by several cell types in NHO sections, especially within clusters of CD68+ macrophages and by multinucleated osteoclasts. We also investigated the OSM level in the plasma of NHO patients and demonstrated that the OSM median level in patient plasma was increased 2-fold compared with HD plasma (Figure 7B).
Since macrophage-derived OSM has been shown to stimulate osteogenic differentiation (39, 41, 42), we analyzed the production of OSM by LPS-activated CD14+ monocytes/macrophages from human NHOs (NHOmac CM+). OSM median level in NHOmac CM+ (LPS) was 45-fold more than in NHOmac CM– (CT; Figure 7C), suggesting that OSM secretion by NHO-associated CD14+ monocytes/macrophages is strongly stimulated by LPS. We then analyzed the expression of OSMRs on NHO-MDSCs and found that OSMR and CD130 (gp130) subunits were both expressed at the surface of these cells, confirming that they can respond to OSM (Figure 7D). We next showed that recombinant human OSM (10–100 ng/ml) increased mineralization of NHO-MDSCs compared with the osteogenic differentiation medium alone (Figure 7E). The stimulating effect of OSM on the osteoblastic differentiation of NHO-MDSCs was further confirmed by Western blot analysis showing that OSM increased expression of Runx2 as well as of osteocalcin, a marker of mature osteoblasts (Figure 7F). We further tested whether OSM secreted by monocytes/macrophages from NHOs participated in the mineralization of NHO-MDSCs. For this purpose, NHOmac CM+ was added (1:10 dilution) to the osteogenic differentiation medium and NHO-MDSCs in the presence of neutralizing mouse anti-human OSM monoclonal antibody (10 μg/ml) or nonimmune isotype-matched mouse IgG2a for 12 days. Addition of anti-OSM antibodies decreased 3-fold NHO-MDSC mineralization induced by the osteogenic differentiation medium supplemented with conditioned medium from LPS-activated monocytes/macrophages (Figure 7G).
These results suggest that OSM is involved in human NHO formation.
OSM accumulates at sites of NHO in mice.
Finally, to confirm the role of OSM in NHO development, we used our mouse model of NHO, in which mice undergo spinal cord transection between T12-T14, together with muscle damage induced by intramuscular injection of cardiotoxin (CDTX) (11). In this model, NHOs develop in the injured muscle exclusively in mice with SCI and CDTX-induced muscle damage (SCI+CDTX) via macrophages infiltrating the injured muscle (11). In wild-type animals at day 4 after injury, Osm mRNA was significantly increased in the injured muscles of SCI+CDTX mice, whereas sham-operated mice with an intramuscular injection of CDTX (Sham+CDTX) had lower induction of Osm mRNA (Figure 8A, P < 0.01). IHC staining of muscles from Sham+CDTX mice (Figure 8B) confirmed the absence of NHO at 21 days after surgery, with very little F4/80+ macrophage infiltration and little expression of collagen type 1 (Coll1), OSM, or osterix, suggesting that muscle is mostly repaired without NHO; likewise, similar results were seen in mice that underwent SCI without CDTX injection (Supplemental Figure 4). In sharp contrast, in SCI+CDTX mice, CDTX-injured hamstring muscle contained Coll1+ bone matrix and osterix+ osteoblasts (Figure 8B). As previously shown (11), in SCI+CDTX mice, F4/80+ macrophages were intercalated among the Coll1+ heterotopic bone foci (Figure 8B), and IHC for OSM confirmed increased expression around areas of NHO, particularly in areas with accumulation of F4/80+ macrophages (Figure 8B, circled area) and osterix+ osteoblasts (Figure 8B, arrows). Overall, this suggests that OSM expression is increased in injured muscles of mice early after SCI, while OSM protein is secreted and accumulates in the sites of HO development after SCI.
Deletion of the Osmr gene reduces NHO formation in response to SCI and muscular injury.
To test the function of OSM signaling in vivo, mice genetically deficient for the OSMR gene (Osmr–/– mice) and their wild-type controls underwent spinal cord transection and CDTX injection as previously described (11). In Osmr–/– mice, NHO volume was significantly reduced compared with wild-type controls 7–14 days after injury (median 3.2 mm3 in Osmr–/– versus 14.4 mm3 in wild-type, P = 0.0038) (Figure 9, A and B), confirming that signaling through the OSMR promotes HO formation in this model.
Finally, we sorted CD45–Ter119–CD31–CD34+Sca1– SCs and CD45–Ter119–CD31–CD34+Sca1+ interstitial cells (ICs) from the hamstring muscles of naive wild-type C57BL/6 mice and cultured them in osteogenic conditions as previously described (11), in the presence or absence of mouse recombinant OSM. Mouse OSM significantly increased the mineralizing potential of mouse muscle ICs and SCs. This suggests that, as in human muscle cells, OSM can promote mineralization and osteogenic differentiation of mouse muscle progenitor cells (Figure 9C).
Altogether, our results strongly suggest that OSM is produced by activated macrophages in injured muscles in the context of SCI and promotes NHO development in humans and mice following SCI or traumatic brain injuries.
Discussion
We report herein that NHOs from patients contain hematopoietic niches in which a mesenchymal and endothelial environment supports HSC maintenance, proliferation, and differentiation. More importantly, our results from patients and mice genetically deficient for OSMR suggest that activated macrophages contribute to NHO formation through the osteogenic action of OSM on muscle cells within an inflammatory context.
The “cell of origin” of HO within the muscle is not well defined. In muscles from HDs, a subpopulation of CD90– MSCs is reportedly capable of differentiating into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes under appropriate conditions in contrast to CD90+ MSCs, which have limited adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation potential (21). PDGFRα+ cells, which exhibited an in vitro and in vivo osteogenic differentiation potential in normal muscles, have been observed on histological sections proximal to the HO-muscle interface in one trauma patient (18). In our study, patient-derived NHO-MDSCs expressed the classical CD73, CD105, and CD90 mesenchymal markers, and, similar to BM-MSCs, they could differentiate toward osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. NHO-MDSCs also had the capacity to produce cartilage extracellular matrix in vitro. Altogether, our results suggest that NHO-MDSCs are capable of participating in the formation of HOs in brain injury or SCI patients, as reported with MSCs isolated from battlefield-injured muscle tissue (19). NHOs can relapse, even 15 years after surgery (F. Genet, unpublished observations) (53), and our results indicate that NHO-MDSCs with osteogenic potential are still present in muscles after NHO resection. This hypothesis is strengthened by the recent study by Agarwal et al. (54), showing that PDGFRα+ MSCs are responsible for HO recurrence in a burn/tenotomy mouse model. Thus, when reactivated under specific conditions, residual NHO-MDSCs may participate in NHO recurrence.
The inflammatory context that frequently accompanies neurogenic trauma (55) has been suggested to be a key actor of NHO development. Inflammatory and osteogenic cytokines are reported to be overexpressed in injured muscles following severe war injuries (56). Likewise, in our clinically relevant model of NHO in mice with SCI, macrophages in injured and inflamed muscles are key drivers of NHO development (11). Furthermore LPS, an inducer of the inflammatory response, slightly increased the mineralizing ability and osteoblastic differentiation of human NHO-MDSCs. These results are consistent with a previous report indicating that LPS weakly stimulated osteoblastic differentiation of BM-MSCs through LIF secretion (39). However, LPS-stimulated macrophages caused a marked increase in NHO-MDSC mineralization and osteoblastic differentiation, suggesting that macrophage activation is involved in this process (Figure 5). Our results using HO biopsies from brain injury or SCI patients confirm our previous study in mice showing the role of macrophage-mediated inflammation in our experimental model of SCI-induced NHO (11). Moreover, addition of medium conditioned by LPS-activated macrophages isolated from NHO (NHOmac CM+) to NHO-MDSC culture medium elicited similar outcomes, indicating that activated macrophages in NHOs release osteogenic factors.
Among these osteogenic factors, OSM — a cytokine produced by several cell types, including activated monocytes/macrophages from peripheral blood and BM (39, 41, 42), osteoblasts, and osteocytes (38) — induces osteogenic differentiation of various cell types, including MSCs from BM or adipose tissues (38–40). OSM is synergistic with TNF-α on vascular calcification in vitro (57) and is required for normal bone formation in vivo, as shown in mice defective for the Osm gene (58) or for its receptor type II Osmr (38). In the current study, we show that OSM concentration is higher in the plasma of NHO patients and that macrophages isolated from patient NHO overproduce OSM after LPS activation in vitro, suggesting that both local and systemic levels of OSM are elevated in NHO. The role of OSM in osteogenic mineralization of NHO-MDSCs was confirmed by the use of neutralizing anti-OSM antibodies, suggesting that OSM produced locally by activated macrophages participates in the development of HOs from muscle cells in SCI or brain-injured patients. This is consistent with our observation that OSM is produced by clusters of CD68+ monocytes/macrophages in NHO histological sections. OSM expression was also noted in osteoblasts and osteocytes in NHO samples (Supplemental Figure 5) and is also likely to further increase the local OSM concentration. This observation in mature human NHO is consistent with the increased expression of Osm mRNA in the injured muscle of mice 4 days after SCI as well as abundant OSM protein associated with both osterix+ NHO osteoblasts and F4/80+ macrophages associated with NHO 21 days after SCI. Of note, OSM protein staining was diffuse in the injured muscle of SCI mice developing HO, consistent with the observation that bioactive OSM binds to extracellular matrix proteins, such as collagen I and laminin (59), which are abundant in muscle, particularly at acidic pH, as found in inflamed or injured tissues. Of note, deletion of the Osmr gene did not completely ablate NHO, as observed following in vivo macrophage depletion with clodronate liposomes (11). This suggests that other cytokines or mechanisms involving macrophages are also at play to promote NHO development in addition to OSM. Among them, the participation of BMP2 in a potential crosstalk with OSM remains to be explored (60). Nevertheless, the fact that NHO volume is reduced 3-fold in Osmr–/– mice demonstrates that OSM/OSMR pathway is an important promoter of NHO development.
By playing multiple critical roles on hematopoietic microenvironment, OSM is reported to regulate hematopoiesis in the BM (43, 44, 61). In the present study, we show that human NHOs represent a suitable microenvironment for maintaining quiescent HSCs and determining their activation state and fate, therefore meeting the definition of HSC niches. Indeed, we show that CD34+ HSCs, with a quiescent SP phenotype (45, 48, 62) and the ability to reconstitute human hematopoiesis in vivo when injected in immunodeficient mice, dwell in human NHOs. It is likely that these NHO-resident HSCs come from the circulation and home to NHO using a suitable mesenchymal and endothelial microenvironment (niches) similar to that existing in the BM. MSCs and endothelial cells are essential components of medullar HSC niches (63–66) and play a major role in HSC maintenance by secreting key cytokines, such as CXCL12 (67). In that respect, it is interesting to note that CXCL12 levels are increased in NHO patient plasma (Supplemental Figure 6) and that CXCL12’s expression has been reported to be stimulated by OSM in MSCs (68). Beside their capacity for AOC differentiation, human NHO-MSCs exhibit similar molecular and functional characteristics to BM-MSCs in terms of long-term human hematopoiesis support and SP functionality induction in vitro (48). More importantly, when seeded on hydroxyapatite scaffolds and subcutaneously implanted into immunodeficient mice (69), human NHO-MSCs reconstituted HSC niches supportive of murine hematopoietic cells confirming their role in supporting hematopoiesis in vivo. Our results definitively demonstrate the presence of functional HSCs within human NHOs.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that OSM, a cytokine required to maintain the microenvironment for hematopoiesis, is secreted by activated macrophages in NHO. It participates in the osteogenic differentiation of human muscle cells from NHO patients in an inflammatory context and in the formation of NHO in a murine model. This suggests that macrophages play a key role in the NHO development observed in brain injury or SCI patients and that OSM or OSMR could be a suitable therapeutic target.
Moreover, we demonstrate that human NHOs contain marrow tissue in which HSCs are maintained by a functional stromal microenvironment, thus documenting that NHOs are ectopic HSC niches. The evidence of hematopoietic cells and niches in ectopic bones growing at the expense of soft tissue in brain-injured or SCI patients strongly argues in favor of the brain-bone-blood triad concept proposed by Lapidot (70) and provides two dimensions to this triad, through muscles and inflammation.
Methods
Human samples
NHOs and muscles surrounding NHOs from 64 patients with brain injuries or SCI, strokes, or cerebral anoxia were sampled at Garches Hospital, Garches, France (Supplemental Table 4). BM cells and unmobilized peripheral blood samples from HDs were obtained at Blois Hospital (Blois, France) after total hip surgery and at Centre de Transfusion Sanguine des Armées (Percy Hospital, Clamart, France), respectively.
Reagents
Human recombinant OSM and TNF-α, LPS and neutralizing anti-human OSM monoclonal antibody (clone 17001), and recombinant mouse OSM were purchased from Miltenyi Biotec, Invivogen, and R&D Systems, respectively.
Immunomagnetic cell separations
NHOs were cut into small pieces, and cells were extracted in RPMI1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mononuclear cells from NHO, BM, or unmobilized peripheral blood were recovered after Pancoll gradient (1.077 g/ml; Dutscher). Immunomagnetic CD34+, CD31+, or CD14+ cell separations were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec).
Isolation of NHO-MSCs and NHO-MDSCs
NHO explants were seeded in α-MEM (Clinisciences) supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% antibiotics (50 μg/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin, and 100 μg/ml neomycin) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Sprouting adherent cells were trypsinized at subconfluence and seeded at 4,000 per cm2.
Adherent cells from muscles surrounding NHOs, named NHO-MDSCs, were trypsinized at subconfluence and seeded at 4,000 per cm².
MSC transcriptomic analysis and bioinformatics
Total RNA from NHO-MSCs (7 samples) and BM-MSCs (9 samples) was extracted by the Nucleospin RNA II protocol from Macharey Nagel. Transcriptomic analysis and bioinformatics were performed as described in the Supplemental Methods.
Tissue collection for histology and IHC analysis
For human NHOs.
Biopsies were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, demineralized in hydrochloric and formic acid, and embedded in paraffin. 4-μm sections were cut on the Cochin HistIM Facility, and IHC was carried out as described in the Supplemental Methods.
For mouse tissues.
At 7–21 days after surgery, mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and the right hind limb was fixed in freshly made 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C for 48 hours and transferred to PBS for micro-computed tomography (μCT) imaging. For histologic analysis, bones were decalcified for at least 2 weeks in 14% EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich), pH 7.2. Once decalcified, all specimens were processed for paraffin embedding. IHC was carried out as previously described (11, 38, 71) and as described in the Supplemental Methods.
Flow cytometry
Cells were incubated in a FACS buffer composed of PBS, 2% FCS, and 2 mM EDTA on ice for 20 minutes with specific antibodies (Supplemental Table 5). Flow cytometry analysis was carried out on BD Fortessa apparatus using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences).
SP cell detection
For SP cell detection in human NHOs, mononuclear cells were isolated on a Pancoll gradient. Lineage-negative (Lin–) cells were recovered using the lineage depletion kit (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. SP population cell detection was performed as described in the Supplemental Methods.
Hematopoietic colony formation and long-term culture-initiating cell assays
CD34+ cells (103/ml) isolated from human NHOs, nonmobilized peripheral blood, or BM were seeded in methylcellulose medium with cytokines according to the manufacturer’s instructions (MethoCult H4034 Optimum, Stemcell Technologies). CFU were scored after 14 days at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere using an inverted microscope.
Long-term culture-initiating cell assays were performed as described in the Supplemental Methods.
Xenografts of CD34+ cells from human NHOs transplanted into immunodeficient mice
Nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficient Il2rg–/– (NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wj1 or NSG) mice (Janvier Labs) were conditioned and grafted as described in the Supplemental Methods.
Isolation of human endothelial cells
CD31+ cells from human NHOs were recovered after immunomagnetic CD31 cell separation and were stained with specific antibodies (Supplemental Table 5). Endothelial CD31+CD144+CD34+CD45– cells were then sorted using FACSAria III (BD Biosciences) and incubated in EGM-2 MV medium (EGM-2MV SingleQuots, Lonza) for 1 month. Matrigel assays as well as ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression were performed on human endothelial cells as described in the Supplemental Methods.
In vivo MSC osteogenic assays
Subconfluent human NHO-MSCs were collected for subcutaneous implantation into the flanks of 10-week-old female nude mice (Janvier Labs). Implants (at least n = 4 per group) were prepared by mixing sterile 80–200 μm particles (60% hydroxyapatite/40% β-tricalcium phosphate) (Graftys), 100 μl human plasma, and 106 human NHO-MSCs as described previously (69). Ten microliters of 2% CaCl2 2H2O was added to obtain coagulation. Ten weeks after implantation, animals were sacrificed and the scaffolds were collected. Scaffolds were decalcified and H&E staining was done for histologic evaluation.
In vitro osteogenic differentiation and quantification of mineralized calcium
Human stromal cells were seeded in 24-well plates at 3,000 per cm2 in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% antibiotics. After cell adhesion, medium was removed and replaced by α-MEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% antibiotics and 0.052 μg/ml dexamethasone, 12.8 μg/ml ascorbic acid, and 2.15 mg/ml β-glycerophosphate from Sigma-Aldrich. Cells were cultured for 12 days to 3 weeks at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere, and medium was changed 2 times in a week. Quantification of mineralization was performed after Alizarin Red S staining as described in the Supplemental Methods.
In vitro adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation
Human stromal cells were seeded either at 21,000 per cm2 or at 2.5 × 105 in a conical tube (volume 15 ml) for in vitro adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation, respectively, in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% antibiotics, as described in the Supplemental Methods for in vitro adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation, respectively.
CD34+ cell differentiation into macrophages
CD34+ cells isolated from human NHOs were seeded at 105 per ml in 24-well plates and cultured in SynH medium (ABCell-Bio) supplemented with SCF, thrombopoietin, Flt3L, and IL-3 (10 ng/ml each, Miltenyi Biotec) for 1 week at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were centrifuged and resuspended in IMDM supplemented with 20% FCS, 1% antibiotics, 25 ng/ml SCF, 30 ng/ml M-CSF, 30 ng/ml Flt3L, and 30 ng/ml IL-3 (all from Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were seeded at 105 per ml in 24-well plates and cultured for an additional week at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Preparation of monocyte/macrophage-conditioned media
CD14+ cells isolated from human NHOs were seeded at 1.25 × 106 per ml in 24-well plates and cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% antibiotics and in the presence or absence of LPS (100 ng/ml) at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere as previously described (39). After 3 days, supernatants were centrifuged to remove cells and frozen at –80°C. Supernatants of CD14+ cells stimulated with LPS were named NHOmac CM+ and supernatants of CD14+ cells without stimulation were named NHOmac CM–.
OSM level evaluation by ELISA
OSM levels were evaluated in blood samples from HDs and from patients with NHOs as well as in conditioned media of CD14+ macrophages isolated from NHOs by ELISA as described in the Supplemental Methods.
Western blot
Cells were lysed in RIPA (Abcam) or Laemmli buffer. Proteins (20 or 30 μg) were loaded on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Primary antibodies included an anti-RUNX2 (rabbit monoclonal antibody, clone D1H7, Cell Signaling), anti-BSPII (rabbit polyclonal antibody, 5468, Cell Signaling), anti-osteocalcin (mouse monoclonal antibody, clone OC4-30, Abcam), or anti–β-actin (mouse monoclonal antibody, clone 6D1, MBL). Alexa Fluor 680 anti-rabbit or anti-mouse (A21076 and A21058, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or DyLight 800 anti-mouse (#35521, Thermo Fisher Scientific) antibodies were added to detect specific proteins using an Odyssey scanner (LI-COR Biosciences).
NHO mouse model
C57BL/6 mice and Osmr–/– mice (backcrossed over 10 times in C57BL/6 background) (6–9 weeks old) were used in all experiments. C57BL/6 mice were obtained from the Animal Resource Center (Perth, Australia), and Osmr–/– mice were provided by NAS. Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine in sterile saline. Alaminectomy was performed on the dorsal spine and the spinal cord was transected with a scalpel blade between T11 and T13. Control animals were anesthetized and sham operated with an incision in the dorsal skin and muscle. Immediately after surgery, while still anesthetized, mice were then injected with CDTX purified from Naja pallida venom (Latoxan) at 0.1568–0.3125 mg/kg or PBS in the right hamstring. Mice received a subcutaneous injection of ciprofloxacin (10 mg/kg) and recovered on a heating pad. As SCI causes paraplegia, mouse bladders were expressed manually by gentle massage of the bladder twice daily throughout the experiments. Mice were given Bactrim (800 mg/l, Roche) in drinking water following surgical procedures as prophylaxis for bladder infections.
Mouse μCT
NHO volume was measured in vivo or ex vivo using the Inveon PET-CT multimodality system (Siemens Medical Solutions Inc.). The parameters used were as follow: 360° rotation, 180 projections, 80 kV voltage, 500 μA current, and effective pixel size 36 μm. 3D images were reconstructed by the μCT system software package. For in vivo imaging, mice were anesthetized by 2% isoflurane during the imaging process. HO volume was analyzed in the Inveon Research Workplace (Siemens Medical Solutions Inc.).
Mouse muscle cell cultures, osteogenic differentiation, and quantification
CD45–Ter119–CD31–CD34+Sca1– SCs and CD45–Ter119–CD31–CD34+Sca1+ ICs from mouse muscles and mesenchymal cells from BM of naive C57BL/6 mice were isolated and sorted by flow cytometry as previously described (11). SCs and ICs were cultured in high glucose DMEM (GIBCO Invitrogen 11960-044) containing 20% (v/v) FBS, 10% horse serum, and 1X penicillin-streptomycin-glutamine (PSG; at 1 U penicillin/ml, 1 μg/ml streptomycin, and 0.2 mM glutamine) (GIBCO Invitrogen, 10378). BM-MSCs were cultured in α-MEM containing 20 % (v/v) FBS (GIBCO Invitrogen, 10099-141) and 1X PSG. All 3 cell types were then cultured under osteogenic conditions (α-MEM [10% (v/v) FBS, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 200 μM phosphoascorbic acid, 2 mM CaCl2, and 0.2 μM dexamethasone]) for 14 days, in the presence or absence of recombinant mouse OSM at 25 ng/ml (R&D Systems). Calcium deposition was quantified using Alizarin Red S as described in the Supplemental Methods.
Mouse mRNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis
Muscle samples (right hamstring muscles) were homogenized in Trizol (Invitrogen), and mRNAs for Osm and Actb (β-actin) were measured as described in the Supplemental Methods.
Statistics
For comparisons of two groups, significance was calculated by the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test or by 2-tailed Student’s t test. For comparisons of more than two groups, significance was calculated either by 1-way or 2-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test using PRISM 6 software (GraphPad software). P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
Study approval
For human studies, all samples were obtained with the informed consent of patients and according to good clinical practices with approval from the people protection committee (CPP 09025) and from the national commission for informatics and Liberties (CNIL Eyo1066211J). For animal studies, the use and care of animals was approved by the French Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee or by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of the University of Queensland.
Author contributions
FT, JPL, JJL, and MCLBK designed the study; FT and BG performed experiments on human samples and analyzed results; FT, AA, and LB performed grafts of human CD34+ cells in mice and analyzed results; AA performed SP cell assays, and NA performed endothelial cell culture and identification; SS performed Western blot experiments; SB provided advice for muscle cell isolation and culture; C Desterke designed and performed MSC transcriptomic, molecular biology, and bioinformatics analyses as well as online big data submission; DC performed endothelial cell sorting and analyzed results; NR, AA, and MCLBK performed scaffold graft experiments in mice, and FT, NR, AA and MCLBK analyzed results; EV, GG, C Debaud, PD, FG, and JJL provided human samples; KAA, HWT, IK, MS, and BJ performed experiments in the mouse model of SCI-induced NHO; KAA also performed osteogenic assays and IHC in the mouse model; ARP performed IHC staining for mouse collagen I, F4/80, and osterix; NAS provided Osmr–/– mice and advice on the experiments in mice; and FT, JPL, JJL, and MCLBK wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by project grant 1101620 from the French Government Defense Procurement and Technology Agency (DGA; to FT, FG, JJL, and MCLBK), project grant APP1101620 from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC to JPL, FG, and NAS), and by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through Spinal Cord Injury Research Program under award no. W81XWH-15-1-0606 from the US Department of Defence; UMR-S-MD1197 is partly funded by INSERM. JPL is supported by research fellowship APP1044091 from the NHMRC. The Translational Research Institute is partly funded by the Federal Government of Australia. The authors are indebted to P. Mauduit (Inserm UMR-S-MD1197, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France) for his scientific and technical advices concerning Western blot analyses. The authors greatly acknowledge the technical assistance of “Cochin HistIM Facility” (Paris, France) and D. Burgot (Polyclinique de Blois, La Chaussée-Saint-Victor, France) for supplying human BM samples. The authors also acknowledge the scientific and technical assistance of the Translational Research Institute Preclinical Imaging Facility, which is supported by Therapeutic Innovation Australia (TIA). TIA is supported by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy program.
Version 1. 11/02/2017
Electronic publication
Funding Statement
This research was funded by Project Grant 1101620 from the DGA (French Government Defense Procurement and Technology Agency) to authors FT, FG, JJL and MCLBK
This research was funded by Project Grant APP1101620 from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) to authors JPL, FG and NAS
Author JPL is supported by Research Fellowship APP1044091 from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(21):e96034. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.96034.
Contributor Information
Frédéric Torossian, Email: torossian.frederic@gmail.com.
Bernadette Guerton, Email: bernadette.guerton@inserm.fr.
Adrienne Anginot, Email: adrienne.anginot@gmail.com.
Christophe Desterke, Email: christophe.desterke@inserm.fr.
Sabrina Soave, Email: sabrina.soave@inserm.fr.
Hsu-Wen Tseng, Email: hsu-wen.tseng@mater.uq.edu.au.
Nassim Arouche, Email: nassim.arouche@inserm.fr.
Laetitia Boutin, Email: laetitiaboutin.lb@gmail.com.
Irina Kulina, Email: irina.kulina84@gmail.com.
Marjorie Salga, Email: marjorie.salga@aphp.fr.
Beulah Jose, Email: beulah.jose88@gmail.com.
Denis Clay, Email: denis.clay@inserm.fr.
Nathalie Rochet, Email: Nathalie.Rochet@unice.fr.
Erica Vlachos, Email: erica.vlachos@aphp.fr.
Guillaume Genet, Email: guillaume.genet-ext@aphp.fr.
Charlotte Debaud, Email: charlotte.debaud@hotmail.fr.
Philippe Denormandie, Email: philippe.denormandie@aphp.fr.
François Genet, Email: francois.genet@aphp.fr.
Sébastien Banzet, Email: sebastien.banzet@inserm.fr.
Jean-Pierre Levesque, Email: jp.levesque@mater.uq.edu.au.
References
- 1.Shore EM, et al. A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet. 2006;38(5):525–527. doi: 10.1038/ng1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fukuda T, et al. Constitutively activated ALK2 and increased SMAD1/5 cooperatively induce bone morphogenetic protein signaling in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(11):7149–7156. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801681200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.van Dinther M, et al. ALK2 R206H mutation linked to fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva confers constitutive activity to the BMP type I receptor and sensitizes mesenchymal cells to BMP-induced osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(6):1208–1215. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.091110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chakkalakal SA, et al. An Acvr1 R206H knock-in mouse has fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(8):1746–1756. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pek CH, Lim MC, Yong R, Wong HP. Neurogenic heterotopic ossification after a stroke: diagnostic and radiological challenges. Singapore Med J. 2014;55(8):e119–e122. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Genêt F, Chehensse C, Jourdan C, Lautridou C, Denormandie P, Schnitzler A. Impact of the operative delay and the degree of neurologic sequelae on recurrence of excised heterotopic ossification in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27(6):443–448. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31822b54ba. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brady RD, Shultz SR, McDonald SJ, O’Brien TJ. Neurological heterotopic ossification: Current understanding and future directions. Bone. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.05. [published online ahead of print May 16, 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2017.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang D, Shurafa MS, Acharya R, Strand VF, Linden MD. Chronic abdominal pain caused by heterotopic ossification with functioning bone marrow: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128(3):321–323. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-321-CAPCBH. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Christofi T, Raptis DA, Kallis A, Ambasakoor F. True trilineage haematopoiesis in excised heterotopic ossification from a laparotomy scar: report of a case and literature review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(5):W12–W14. doi: 10.1308/147870808X303056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Davis TA, Lazdun Y, Potter BK, Forsberg JA. Ectopic bone formation in severely combat-injured orthopedic patients -- a hematopoietic niche. Bone. 2013;56(1):119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Genêt F, et al. Neurological heterotopic ossification following spinal cord injury is triggered by macrophage-mediated inflammation in muscle. J Pathol. 2015;236(2):229–240. doi: 10.1002/path.4519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boulais PE, Frenette PS. Making sense of hematopoietic stem cell niches. Blood. 2015;125(17):2621–2629. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-570192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chalmers J, Gray DH, Rush J. Observations on the induction of bone in soft tissues. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57(1):36–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kan L, Kessler JA. Evaluation of the cellular origins of heterotopic ossification. Orthopedics. 2014;37(5):329–340. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140430-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Suda RK, et al. Circulating osteogenic precursor cells in heterotopic bone formation. Stem Cells. 2009;27(9):2209–2219. doi: 10.1002/stem.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Otsuru S, Tamai K, Yamazaki T, Yoshikawa H, Kaneda Y. Bone marrow-derived osteoblast progenitor cells in circulating blood contribute to ectopic bone formation in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;354(2):453–458. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wosczyna MN, Biswas AA, Cogswell CA, Goldhamer DJ. Multipotent progenitors resident in the skeletal muscle interstitium exhibit robust BMP-dependent osteogenic activity and mediate heterotopic ossification. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(5):1004–1017. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oishi T, et al. Osteogenic differentiation capacity of human skeletal muscle-derived progenitor cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nesti LJ, et al. Differentiation potential of multipotent progenitor cells derived from war-traumatized muscle tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(11):2390–2398. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Davis TA, O’Brien FP, Anam K, Grijalva S, Potter BK, Elster EA. Heterotopic ossification in complex orthopaedic combat wounds: quantification and characterization of osteogenic precursor cell activity in traumatized muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(12):1122–1131. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Downey J, et al. Prospective heterotopic ossification progenitors in adult human skeletal muscle. Bone. 2015;71:164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bragdon B, Moseychuk O, Saldanha S, King D, Julian J, Nohe A. Bone morphogenetic proteins: a critical review. Cell Signal. 2011;23(4):609–620. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leblanc E, et al. BMP-9-induced muscle heterotopic ossification requires changes to the skeletal muscle microenvironment. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(6):1166–1177. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Anthonissen J, Ossendorf C, Ritz U, Hofmann A, Rommens PM. Animal models for acquired heterotopic ossification. Acta Orthop Belg. 2014;80(1):2–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kan L, Kessler JA. Animal models of typical heterotopic ossification. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:309287. doi: 10.1155/2011/309287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Evans KN, et al. Inflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression is associated with heterotopic ossification in high-energy penetrating war injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(11):e204–e213. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31825d60a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Edwards DS, Clasper JC. Heterotopic ossification: a systematic review. J R Army Med Corps. 2015;161(4):315–321. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2014-000277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Slaets H, et al. Oncostatin M reduces lesion size and promotes functional recovery and neurite outgrowth after spinal cord injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;50(3):1142–1151. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8795-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Guo S, et al. Oncostatin M confers neuroprotection against ischemic Stroke. J Neurosci. 2015;35(34):12047–12062. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1800-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Blanchard F, Duplomb L, Baud’huin M, Brounais B. The dual role of IL-6-type cytokines on bone remodeling and bone tumors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009;20(1):19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gearing DP, et al. The IL-6 signal transducer, gp130: an oncostatin M receptor and affinity converter for the LIF receptor. Science. 1992;255(5050):1434–1437. doi: 10.1126/science.1542794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mosley B, et al. Dual oncostatin M (OSM) receptors. Cloning and characterization of an alternative signaling subunit conferring OSM-specific receptor activation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(51):32635–32643. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Richards CD. The enigmatic cytokine oncostatin m and roles in disease. ISRN Inflamm. 2013;2013:512103. doi: 10.1155/2013/512103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Suda T, et al. Oncostatin M production by human dendritic cells in response to bacterial products. Cytokine. 2002;17(6):335–340. doi: 10.1006/cyto.2002.1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Grenier A, et al. Oncostatin M production and regulation by human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Blood. 1999;93(4):1413–1421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lisignoli G, et al. Osteoblasts and stromal cells isolated from femora in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) patients express IL-11, leukaemia inhibitory factor and oncostatin M. Clin Exp Immunol. 2000;119(2):346–353. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01114.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Repovic P, Benveniste EN. Prostaglandin E2 is a novel inducer of oncostatin-M expression in macrophages and microglia. J Neurosci. 2002;22(13):5334–5343. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05334.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Walker EC, et al. Oncostatin M promotes bone formation independently of resorption when signaling through leukemia inhibitory factor receptor in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(2):582–592. doi: 10.1172/JCI40568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guihard P, et al. Induction of osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by activated monocytes/macrophages depends on oncostatin M signaling. Stem Cells. 2012;30(4):762–772. doi: 10.1002/stem.1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Song HY, Jeon ES, Kim JI, Jung JS, Kim JH. Oncostatin M promotes osteogenesis and suppresses adipogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101(5):1238–1251. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nicolaidou V, et al. Monocytes induce STAT3 activation in human mesenchymal stem cells to promote osteoblast formation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e39871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fernandes TJ, et al. Cord blood-derived macrophage-lineage cells rapidly stimulate osteoblastic maturation in mesenchymal stem cells in a glycoprotein-130 dependent manner. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e73266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tanaka M, Hirabayashi Y, Sekiguchi T, Inoue T, Katsuki M, Miyajima A. Targeted disruption of oncostatin M receptor results in altered hematopoiesis. Blood. 2003;102(9):3154–3162. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sato F, Miyaoka Y, Miyajima A, Tanaka M. Oncostatin M maintains the hematopoietic microenvironment in the bone marrow by modulating adipogenesis and osteogenesis. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, Conner AS, Mulligan RC. Isolation and functional properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo. J Exp Med. 1996;183(4):1797–1806. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.4.1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Charbord P, et al. A systems biology approach for defining the molecular framework of the hematopoietic stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(3):376–391. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sutherland HJ, Eaves CJ, Lansdorp PM, Thacker JD, Hogge DE. Differential regulation of primitive human hematopoietic cells in long-term cultures maintained on genetically engineered murine stromal cells. Blood. 1991;78(3):666–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Malfuson JV, et al. SP/drug efflux functionality of hematopoietic progenitors is controlled by mesenchymal niche through VLA-4/CD44 axis. Leukemia. 2014;28(4):853–864. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Holzapfel BM, et al. Tissue engineered humanized bone supports human hematopoiesis in vivo. Biomaterials. 2015;61:103–114. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Youssefian T, et al. Nodular osteochondrogenic activity in soft tissue surrounding osteoma in neurogenic para osteo-arthropathy: morphological and immunohistochemical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004;5:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Beauchamp JR, et al. Expression of CD34 and Myf5 defines the majority of quiescent adult skeletal muscle satellite cells. J Cell Biol. 2000;151(6):1221–1234. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.6.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Stec M, et al. Expansion and differentiation of CD14+CD16(-) and CD14+ +CD16+ human monocyte subsets from cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82(3):594–602. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0207117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Almangour W, Schnitzler A, Salga M, Debaud C, Denormandie P, Genêt F. Recurrence of heterotopic ossification after removal in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59(4):263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Agarwal S, et al. Surgical excision of heterotopic ossification leads to re-emergence of mesenchymal stem cell populations responsible for recurrence. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(3):799–806. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mautes AE, Weinzierl MR, Donovan F, Noble LJ. Vascular events after spinal cord injury: contribution to secondary pathogenesis. Phys Ther. 2000;80(7):673–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jackson WM, et al. Cytokine expression in muscle following traumatic injury. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(10):1613–1620. doi: 10.1002/jor.21354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shioi A, et al. Induction of bone-type alkaline phosphatase in human vascular smooth muscle cells: roles of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and oncostatin M derived from macrophages. Circ Res. 2002;91(1):9–16. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000026421.61398.F2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Guihard P, et al. Oncostatin M, an inflammatory cytokine produced by macrophages, supports intramembranous bone healing in a mouse model of tibia injury. Am J Pathol. 2015;185(3):765–775. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ryan RE, et al. Oncostatin M binds to extracellular matrix in a bioactive conformation: implications for inflammation and metastasis. Cytokine. 2015;72(1):71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zou F, et al. Effects of oncostatin M on cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in C3H10T1/2. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016;16(4):377–385. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Minehata K, et al. Oncostatin m maintains the hematopoietic microenvironment and retains hematopoietic progenitors in the bone marrow. Int J Hematol. 2006;84(4):319–327. doi: 10.1532/IJH97.06090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pierre-Louis O, et al. Dual SP/ALDH functionalities refine the human hematopoietic Lin-CD34+CD38- stem/progenitor cell compartment. Stem Cells. 2009;27(10):2552–2562. doi: 10.1002/stem.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Méndez-Ferrer S, et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature. 2010;466(7308):829–834. doi: 10.1038/nature09262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ding L, Saunders TL, Enikolopov G, Morrison SJ. Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2012;481(7382):457–462. doi: 10.1038/nature10783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ding L, Morrison SJ. Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature. 2013;495(7440):231–235. doi: 10.1038/nature11885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Greenbaum A, et al. CXCL12 in early mesenchymal progenitors is required for haematopoietic stem-cell maintenance. Nature. 2013;495(7440):227–230. doi: 10.1038/nature11926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ehninger A, Trumpp A. The bone marrow stem cell niche grows up: mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages move in. J Exp Med. 2011;208(3):421–428. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lee MJ, Song HY, Kim MR, Sung SM, Jung JS, Kim JH. Oncostatin M stimulates expression of stromal-derived factor-1 in human mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(3):650–659. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bouvet-Gerbettaz S, et al. Adaptive immune response inhibits ectopic mature bone formation induced by BMSCs/BCP/plasma composite in immune-competent mice. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(21-22):2950–2962. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lapidot T, Kollet O. The brain-bone-blood triad: traffic lights for stem-cell homing and mobilization. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2010;2010:1–6. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chang MK, et al. Osteal tissue macrophages are intercalated throughout human and mouse bone lining tissues and regulate osteoblast function in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. 2008;181(2):1232–1244. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.2.1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.