Abstract
We previously identified a novel Rab small GTPase protein, Rab37, which plays a critical role in regulating exocytosis of secreted glycoproteins, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP1) to suppress lung cancer metastasis. Patients with preserved Rab37 protein expression were associated with better prognosis. However, a significant number of the patients with preserved Rab37 expression showed poor survival. In addition, the molecular mechanism for the regulation of Rab37-mediated exocytosis remained to be further identified. Therefore, we investigated the molecular mechanism underlying the dysregulation of Rab37-mediated exocytosis and metastasis suppression. Here, we report a novel mechanism for Rab37 inactivation by phosphorylation. Lung cancer patients with preserved Rab37, low TIMP1, and high PKCα expression profile correlate with worse progression-free survival examined by Kaplan-Meier survival, suggesting that PKCα overexpression leads to dysfunction of Rab37. This PKCα-Rab37-TIMP1 expression profile predicts the poor outcome by multivariate Cox regression analysis. We also show that Rab37 is phosphorylated by protein kinase Cα (PKCα) at threonine 172 (T172), leading to attenuation of its GTP-bound state, and impairment of the Rab37-mediated exocytosis of TIMP1, and thus reduces its suppression activity on lung cancer cell motility. We further demonstrate that PKCα reduces vesicle colocalization of Rab37 and TIMP1, and therefore inhibits Rab37-mediated TIMP1 trafficking. Moreover, Phospho-mimetic aspartate substitution mutant T172D of Rab37 significantly promotes tumor metastasis in vivo. Our findings reveal a novel regulation of Rab37 activity by PKCα-mediated phosphorylation which inhibits exocytic transport of TIMP1 and thereby enhances lung tumor metastasis.
Keywords: Rab37, PKCα, exocytosis, metastasis, prognosis
INTRODUCTION
Rab small GTPases consist of the largest subgroup of Ras superfamily and function as regulators of intracellular vesicle transport, such as endocytosis, receptor recycling and exocytosis [1–3]. Crosstalk between complex networks of Rab and effector proteins, including kinases, phosphatases, sorting or tethering adaptors, and motors ensures precise regulation of vesicle traffic [4–6]. All Rab GTPases have consensus motifs to bind GDP (inactive form) and switch to active form when bound to GTP [7]. Notably, emerging evidence show that dysregulated Rab-mediated transport pathways and aberrant expression of Rab GTPases are implicated in tumorigenesis. Indeed, overexpression of Rab2A, Rab3D, Rab8, Rab11, Rab21, Rab23, Rab25, Rab27B and Rab35 promotes tumor cell migration and invasion [8–16].
We have previously cloned human Rab37 and found that Rab37 mRNA was down-regulated by promoter hypermethylation in non-small cell lung cancer patients. The low level of Rab37 mRNA expression was associated with tumor metastasis [17]. Therefore, we hypothesize that Rab37 acts as a tumor suppressor in lung cancer. We have identified TIMP1 and TSP1 as the potential trafficking cargos of Rab37 by secretome analysis [18]. We further demonstrate that expression of Rab37 suppresses tumor progression by mediating exocytosis of TIMP1 and TSP1 to inactivate extracellular metalloproteinase 9 and to inhibit tumor neovasculature respectively [18, 19]. Since the sophisticated regulation of Rab activity is important for spatiotemporal control of vesicle traffic, it remains elusive whether phosphorylation modification of Rab37 regulates its functions in exocytosis and tumorigenesis. In this report, we show that Rab37 phosphorylation by PKCα inactivates Rab37-mediated exocytic transport by decreasing GTP-bound active form and thereby enhances lung tumor invasion and metastasis.
RESULTS
Clinical impacts of inverse correlation of PKCα/TIMP1 expression
We previously reported that preserved expressions of metastatic suppressor Rab37 and its cargo, TIMP1, were associated with better prognosis [18]. However, a subgroup of lung cancer patients with preserved Rab37 level was linked to high mortality. Therefore, we hypothesized that the patients with poor prognosis but preserved Rab37 expression may result from the dysfunction of Rab37 in their tumor tissues. Since members of PKC family regulate physiological function of some Rab GTPases by phosphorylation [20, 21], a panel of PKC inhibitors was used to screen for kinase of Rab37 (Supplementary Figure 1A). Additional gene manipulation experiments showed that PKCα was the candidate kinase for Rab37 phosphorylation (see below). We therefore tested whether Rab37 dysregulation was associated with PKCα level in clinical lung cancer specimens. We examined Rab37, TIMP1 and PKCα expression patterns in tumor specimens from 158 lung cancer patients and assigned protein expression levels into preserved, overexpressed and low expression by immunohistochemical analysis (Figure 1A). A total of 107 (67.7%) patients showed preserved Rab37 protein expression (Figure 1B and Table 1). We then performed stratification analyses for TIMP1 and PKCα expression in this subgroup of 107 patients with preserved Rab37 expression. Strikingly, we observed a strong inverse correlation between TIMP1 and PKCα (73%, p < 0.0001; Figure 1B and Table 1). Patients with preserved Rab37 expression and low TIMP1 expression were significantly associated with PKCα overexpression, supporting our hypothesis that PKCα overexpression leads to dysfunction of Rab37.
Table 1. Clinicopathological parameters in lung cancer patients enrolled in the present study.
Characteristics | Total | Rab37 expression | TIMP1 expression | PKCα expression | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low (%) | Preserved (%) | Low (%) | Preserved (%) | Overexpressed (%) | Low (%) | ||||
N = 158 | 51 (32.3%) | 107 (67.7%) | 72 (45.6%) | 86 (54.4%) | 85 (53.8%) | 73 (46.2%) | |||
Type | |||||||||
SCC | 21 | 9 (42.9%) | 12 (57.1%) | 17 (81.0%) | 4 (19.0%) | 16 (76.2%) | 5 (23.8%) | ||
ADC | 137 | 42 (30.7%) | 95 (69.3%) | 55 (40.1%) | 82 (59.9%)0.001 | 69 (50.4%) | 68 (49.6%)0.027 | ||
Stage | |||||||||
Stage I–II | 107 | 27 (25.2%) | 80 (74.8%) | 47 (43.9%) | 60 (56.1%) | 58 (54.2%) | 49 (45.8%) | ||
Stage III–IV | 51 | 24 (47.0%) | 27 (53.0%)0.009 | 25 (49.0%) | 26 (51.0%) | 27 (53.0%) | 24 (47.0%) | ||
T stage | |||||||||
Stage 1–2 | 127 | 38 (29.9%) | 89 (70.1%) | 53 (41.7%) | 74 (58.3%) | 68 (53.5%) | 59 (46.5%) | ||
Stage 3–4 | 29 | 12 (41.4%) | 17 (58.6%) | 18 (62.1%) | 11 (37.9%)0.047 | 17 (58.6%) | 12 (41.4%) | ||
N stage | |||||||||
N0 | 88 | 23 (26.1%) | 65 (73.9%) | 41 (46.6%) | 47 (53.4%) | 51 (58.0%) | 37 (42.0%) | ||
> N1 | 69 | 27 (39.1%) | 42 (60.9%) | 30 (43.5%) | 39 (56.5%) | 34 (49.3%) | 35 (50.7%) | ||
M stage | |||||||||
M0 | 133 | 38 (28.6%) | 95 (71.4%) | 58 (43.6%) | 75 (56.4%) | 66 (49.6%) | 67 (50.4%) | ||
> M1 | 23 | 12 (52.2%) | 11 (47.8%)0.025 | 13 (56.5%) | 10 (43.5%) | 19 (82.6%) | 4 (17.4%)0.003 | ||
TIMP1 expression | |||||||||
Low | 72 | 38 (52.8%) | 34 (47.2%) | -- | -- | 54 (63.5%) | 18 (24.7%) | ||
Preserved | 86 | 13 (15.1%) | 73 (84.9%)0.001 | -- | -- | 31 (36.5%) | 55 (75.3%)0.001 |
NOTE: SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; ADC, adenocarcinoma; --, not applicable.
The data was analyzed by Pearson χ2 test. P values with statistical significance are as indicated.
To determine the prognostic effects of Rab37, TIMP1 and PKCα expression, survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with preserved Rab37 and TIMP1 expression, and low PKCα expression had better overall survival and disease-free survival, while patients with preserved Rab37, low TIMP1, and high PKCα displayed significantly worse outcome (P = 0.001 for overall survival; P = 0.001 for disease-free survival, Figure 1C and 1D). We then performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to determine whether preserved Rab37, low TIMP1 and high PKCα expression pattern is an independent prognostic factor. The univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with preserved Rab37, low TIMP1 and PKCα overexpression, with late stage, larger tumor size status, lymph node metastases or distant organs metastases had an increased risk for poor outcome (Table 2). Remarkably, multivariate Cox regression analysis by including all variables with a significant association in univariate analysis showed that patients with preserved Rab37, low TIMP1 and high PKCα expression pattern correlated with a relative risk of death of 3.81 (P = 0.002, confidence interval = 1.66–8.72; Table 2), suggesting that preserved Rab37, low TIMP1 and high PKCα expression was an independent risk factor of poor outcome. Taken together, these clinical results link PKCα overexpression with poor clinical outcome even in the group of patients with preserved expression of metastatic suppressor Rab37.
Table 2. Cox regression analysis of risk factors for cancer-related death in lung cancer patients.
Characteristics | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | P-valuea | HR (95% CI) | P-valuea | |
Rab37/TIMP1/PKCα expression |
||||
+/+/− | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Others | 1.27 (0.68–2.38) | 0.450 | 1.53 (0.78–3.01) | 0.215 |
+/−/+ | 3.15 (1.55–6.38) | 0.001 | 3.81 (1.66–8.72) | 0.002 |
Type | ||||
ADC | 1.00 | --b | ||
SCC | 1.24 (0.35–1.41) | 0.283 | --b | --b |
Stage | ||||
Stage I-II | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Stage III-IV | 1.73 (1.05–2.87) | 0.032 | 1.28 (0.64–2.57) | 0.488 |
T stage | ||||
Stage 1–2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Stage 3–4 | 1.89 (1.08–3.31) | 0.026 | 1.07 (0.54–2.11) | 0.848 |
N stage | ||||
N0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
> N1 | 1.83 (1.09–3.07) | 0.022 | 1.75 (0.87–3.49) | 0.115 |
M stage | ||||
M0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
> wM1 | 1.83 (1.02–3.29) | 0.042 | 1.01 (0.52–1.95) | 0.987 |
NOTE: ADC, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
aBold values represented statistical significance (P < 0.05).
bThe variables without significant HR in univariate analysis were not included in the multivariate analysis.
Phosphorylation of Rab37 by PKCα abrogates Rab37 GTP binding state
Little is known about Rab37 phosphorylation in epithelial cells. We thus investigated whether Rab37 was phosphorylated in lung cancer cells by transfecting PC-14 cells with an empty vector (EV) or a plasmid carrying HA-tagged Rab37 wild-type (WT) insert. The phosphorylation of Rab37 was detected on the serine/threonine residue(s) (Supplementary Figure 1B). Further, in vitro kinase assay was performed to verify whether PKCα was responsible for phosphorylation of Rab37. As shown in Figure 2, phosphorylation levels of GST-Rab37 was enhanced with increasing PKCα activity (Figure 2A), whereas blocking PKCα activity by Go6976 inhibited the incorporation of [g-32p] ATP into GST-Rab37 (Figure 2B). These results indicated that PKCα is capable of phosphorylating Rab37 in vitro.
Notably, an increased in vitro PKCα kinase activity was observed as evident by autophosphorylated signals of PKCα (Figure 2B). To test whether PKCα phosphorylates Rab37 in lung cancer cell-based studies, we first detected the PKCα activity by measuring the phospho-substrates of PKCα in cells with overexpression of PKCα (Supplementary Figure 2). Next, we used PMA, a potent activator of PKCα, to stimulate Rab37 phosphorylation in PC-14 cells stably expressing WT-Rab37. PMA induced Rab37 phosphorylation on serine/threonine (p-S/T) residue(s), and the phosphorylated signal of Rab37 was inhibited by knockdown of PKCα (Figure 2C). Interestingly, PMA treatment abrogated Rab37 GTP binding as analyzed by immunoprecipitation (IP) with GTP-Sepharose affinity beads followed by immunoblotting analysis (Figure 2D). Notably, PKCα knockdown dramatically restored Rab37 GTP binding upon PMA treatment, suggesting that PKCα-mediated phosphorylation dampened the GTP-bound active state of Rab37 (Figure 2E). Taken together, these results suggested that PKCα-mediated Rab37 phosphorylation leads to reduction in GTP-bound Rab37.
PKCα abolishes Rab37-mediated exocytosis function and metastasis suppression activity
To further characterize the effects of PKCα-mediated Rab37 phosphorylation on Rab37-regulated cargo secretion, we measured the amounts of Rab37-mediated secretion of cargos, TIMP1 and TSP1, in the conditioned medium (CM) from WT-Rab37-stable PC-14 cell line with transient PKCα-overexpression or knockdown. Notably, lower amounts of TIMP1 and TSP1 were observed in the CM from PKCα overexpressing cells (Figure 3A), while knockdown of PKCα increased TIMP1 and TSP1 level in CM (Figure 3B). These data were consistent with the model predicting the suppression of Rab37-mediated cargo secretion by PKCα. To further determine the mechanism for the suppression of Rab37-mediated cargo secretion by PKCα, FLAG-tagged WT-Rab37-specific vesicles were isolated and analyzed for levels of TIMP1 and TSP1. The results showed that TIMP1 and TSP1 were associated with Rab37-containing vesicle fractions and the association was abrogated by overexpressing PKCα (Figure 3C). In contrast, siRNA-knockdown of PKCα expression increased the association of TIMP1 and TSP1 with Rab37 in the same vesicle fractions (Figure 3D).
Furthermore, we performed immuno-electron microscopy (immuno-EM) assay for ultrastructural localization of Rab37 and TIMP1 and found that Rab37 and TIMP1 localized on the same vesicles (47%, upper; Figure 3E and Supplementary Figure 3A), while there was a marked reduction of colocalization of Rab37 and TIMP1 in PKCα-overexpressing cells where most Rab37 proteins were dissociated from the vesicle membranes and scattered with cytoplasm (18%, middle; Figure 3E and Supplementary Figure 3A). The reduction in Rab37 and TIMP1 colocalization was recovered in cells with PKCα knockdown (52%, lower; Figure 3E and Supplementary Figure 3A). Notably, the fractionation assay showed that WT-Rab37, but not phospho-deficient alanine substitution mutant at threonine-172 (T172A), associated with less membrane fraction upon activation of PKCα by PMA treatment (Supplementary Figure 3B). Additional mass spectrometry analysis and site-direct mutagenesis experiments to identify the Rab37 phosphorylation are described below.
Finally, the regulation of TIMP1 trafficking dynamics by Rab37 was analyzed by using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy, which allowed us to monitor real-time images of fluorescently labeled vesicles located in close proximity to the plasma membrane (upper, Figure 3F; Supplementary Movie 1). Overexpression of PKCα dramatically attenuated Rab37-mediated TIMP1 exocytotic transport in WT-Rab37 cells (middle, Figure 3F; Supplementary Movie 2), whereas the TIMP1-containing vesicles trafficking events were more in PKCα-silenced WT-Rab37 cells than that in control WT-Rab37 cells (lower; Figure 3F; Supplementary Movie 3). These data therefore supported a mechanism by which PKCα blocks Rab37-mediated cargos secretion by facilitating the dissociation of phosphorylated Rab37 from its targeting vesicles.
PKCα phosphorylates Rab37 on threonine-172
To identify the phosphorylation site(s) on Rab37 by PKCα, an in vitro kinase assay with recombinant PKCα and purified GST-Rab37 was performed. Mass spectrometry analysis of the phosphorylated Rab37 after in vitro PKCα kinase reaction identified six potential sites on Rab37, designated as S94, S149, T160, T172, S203 and S212 that may be phosphorylated by PKCα. The phospho-mimetic aspartate (D) substitution mutants of these six candidate sites were constructed. Since Rab37 acts as a cell motility suppressor, the effects of these mutants on cell motility were then determined by transwell migration and invasion assays. Among the mutants, only the replacement of threonine-172 with aspartate T172D showed significant promotion of cell migration and invasion (Figure 4A). We also performed cell migration and invasion assays using Rab37 mutant constructs with the six potential residues mutated to alanine (A). These phospho-deficient mutants displayed similar migration and invasion abilities compared with WT-Rab37 (Supplementary Figure 4). These data suggested that PKCα may phosphorylate Rab37 at T172 to alter the Rab37-mediated functions. We then performed in vitro kinase assay to further confirm PKCα phosphorylation of Rab37 at T172. The p-S/T signal disappeared when GST-Rab37-T172A was used as the substrate of PKCα or in the presence of PKCα inhibitor Go6976 (Figure 4B). Moreover, PMA-induced Rab37 phosphorylation was inhibited in Rab37-T172A-expressing PC-14 cells (Figure 4C). These in vitro and cell-based results indicated that T172 of Rab37 is phosphorylated by PKCα.
Threonine-172 phosphorylation disrupts Rab37 GTP binding
Since PKCα-mediated Rab37 phosphorylation reduced Rab37 in GTP-bound form (Figure 2) and impaired Rab37-mediated exocytic function (Figure 3), we therefore speculated whether PKCα-mediated T172 phosphorylation of Rab37 inhibited GTP binding ability of Rab37. As shown in Figure 4D, GTP-bound active glutamine-to-leucine of Rab37 (Q89L-Rab37) mutant displayed a significant increase in GTP binding compared to WT-Rab37. Interestingly, both T172D-Rab37 mutant and Q89L/T172D-Rab37 double mutant reduced the level of GTP-bound active Rab37 (Figure 4D), suggesting that T172 phosphorylation inhibited the activity of Rab37 via reducing the abundance of GTP-bound Rab37. Moreover, the amount of GTP-bound Rab37 in WT-Rab37 cells was diminished upon PMA treatment, whereas the GTP-bound form of phospho-deficient mutant T172A was not affected by PMA stimulation (Figure 4E, lanes 5 and 6). Collectively, our results suggested that PKCα-mediated Rab37 phosphorylation at T172 attenuates Rab37 activity through reduction in GTP-bound state.
Phosphorylation of Rab37 on threonine-172 by PKCα abolishes its colocalization with TIMP1, resulting in loss of its motility suppressive function
Since PKCα-mediated phosphorylation disrupted exocytic trafficking of TIMP1 and TSP1 by Rab37 (Figure 3) and reduced the GTP-bound state and membrane bound form of Rab37 (Figures 2 and 4), we further interrogated the cellular localization of Rab37 and its cargo TIMP1 in Rab37-WT, Rab37-T172D and Rab37-T172A cells. Indeed, ectopically expressed Rab37-WT or Rab37-T172A co-localized with TIMP1, whereas Rab37-T172D displayed distinct cellular distribution from TIMP1 in PC-14 cells (Figure 5A, merged panel). Accordingly, PKCα expression markedly decreased CM concentration of TIMP1 and TSP1 in Rab37-WT cells, but not in Rab37-T172A cells (Figure 5B). In contrast, lower CM level of TIMP1 and TSP1 were observed in cells expressing T172D mutant. Note that siRNA-mediated knockdown of PKCα significantly increased the CM concentration of TIMP1 and TSP1 in Rab37-WT cells. In addition, change in PKCα level did not alter the exocytic trafficking activity in the Rab37-T172D mutant-expressing cells (Figure 5C). Furthermore, overexpression of PKCα could not further interfere with the regulation on cell motility in the T172A cells (Figure 5D). Accordingly, silencing PKCα also could not lead to additional enhancement of cell migration in the T172D-expressing cells (Figure 5E). Of note, the amount of secreted TIMP1 and TSP1 level in CM from Rab-T172A and -T172D cells were consistent with the scenario that Rab37 phosphorylation at T172 attenuated cargo secretion and thus impaired Rab37-mediated suppression of cell migration and invasion (Figure 5). Similar results of inhibitory effects of PKCα-mediated T172 phosphorylation of Rab37 on cellular distribution, Rab37-mediated TIMP1 and TSP1 secretion and motility suppression were observed in another lung cancer cell line A549 (Supplementary Figure 5). These results indicated that PKCα-mediated T172 phosphorylation of Rab37 eliminates TIMP1 secretion and thus promotes cell motility.
Phospho-mimetic mutant of Rab37 on threonine-172 promotes metastasis in vivo
The inhibition of Rab37 activity by PKCα-mediated phosphorylation in cell-based model prompted us to investigate whether T172 phosphorylation of Rab37 impaired metastasis suppression in animals. We injected EV control, WT- and T172D-Rab37 expressing cells into the tail vein of nude mice. Consistent with our findings in cell model, T172D-Rab37 cells markedly enhanced lung metastases in injected mice compared with mice injected with WT-Rab37 cells (Figure 6A–6C). Importantly, when the concordant expression of WT-Rab37 and TIMP1 was confirmed in vivo, T172D-derived lung metastases showed similarly high Rab37 expression but lower TIMP1 staining as compared to that in WT-Rab37-derived lung metastases (Figure 6D). These in vivo results further support the notion that Rab37 phosphorylation at T172 inactivates the Rab37-mediated TIMP1 secretion and thus promotes tumor metastases.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we identify a novel mechanism for repression of Rab37 activity by PKCα-mediated phosphorylation via interfering with its GTP binding state. We unravel a phosphorylation site on Rab37 at threonine-172, which is critical for regulation of Rab37 activities including GTP-bound conformation, exocytosis of the cell motility inhibitors TIMP1 and TSP1, and metastasis suppression in vitro, in vivo and clinically (Figure 7). From a clinical point of view, we identified a group of lung cancer patients with a profile of high PKCα, high Rab37 and low TIMP1 secretion, and this group of patients displayed poor prognosis (Figure 1 and Tables 1–2). The mechanism for phosphorylation of Rab37 by PKCα leading to malfunction of Rab37-mediated exocytosis of TIMP1 and aggressive metastasis is further supported by our cell and animal data (Figures 3–6). Our findings provide the molecular insight into how Rab37 activity is regulated by phosphorylation coupled to the GTP/GDP binding mechanism (Figures 2 and 4) with prognostic implications.
Several Rab GTPases are identified as targets for PKC isozymes such as Rab5a, Rab6 and Rab11 [20–22]. Phosphorylation of Rab5a by PKCε promotes Rac1 activation to facilitate actin remodeling [20]. Conventional PKC-mediated Rab11 and Rab6 phosphorylation results in impaired endosomal recycling and redistribution in cytosolic fraction, respectively [21, 22]. However, it remains unclear whether PKC-mediated phosphorylation regulates activities in vesicle trafficking and cargo transport of these Rabs. Our results demonstrated that phosphorylation of Rab37 by PKCα suppressed the exocytotic activity of cargos, TIMP1 and TSP1, mediated by Rab37 (Figures 3–5). Images from confocal microscopy and immuno-EM analysis illustrated dislocation of Rab37 from TIMP1-containing vesicles upon PKCα overexpression (Figure 5A and Figures 3A–3E). Importantly, this dislocation may result from reduction of active GTP-bound Rab37 (Figures 2D and E). In addition, our results indicated that T172 phosphorylation inhibited GTP-bound Rab37 state (Figure 4E), suggesting that T172 phosphorylation has a crucial role in regulating the GTP-bound Rab37 activity.
Interestingly, threonine-172 is located in the G5 box (ETSAK), a conserved region that is involved in the guanine-nucleotide binding (Supplementary Figure 6). This raises the possibility that T172 phosphorylation impairs GTP binding via electric repulsion or interference of GTP entry into the binding pocket of Rab37 spatiotemporally. In addition, Rab GTPase activity is determined by interaction with effector complex and GDP/GTP binding state, which is catalyzed by GTPase-activating proteins (GAP) and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF) [23]. A glutamine-to-leucine mutation of Rab37 (Q89L) stabilizes Rab in an active conformation by prevention of GAP-mediated GTP hydrolysis [24]. Unexpectedly, overexpression of PKCα abrogated the suppression of Q89L-Rab37 active mutant on cell motility (Supplementary Figure 7) and T172 phosphorylation of Rab37 reduced the level of GTP-bound Q89L mutant (Figure 4D). We therefore speculated that T172 phosphorylation of Rab37 might affect the interaction with its cognate effectors. Indeed, studies have shown that phosphorylation of Rab4 by p34cdc2 prevents the association of Rab4 with endosomal membrane by dissociating the binding to membrane effector during the cell cycle [25, 26]. Rab8A phosphorylation on S111 is also observed to impair its binding to Rabin8, the GEF for Rab8A that triggers GDP exchange [27]. It will be interesting to identify the effector proteins and GEF for Rab37 to clarify this notion.
The downstream targets of PKC family as predicted by computational strategies commonly contain linear consensus motifs such as (S/T)X(K/R), (K/R)XX(S/T) or (L/R)X(S/T). Here we performed in vitro kinase assay with recombinant PKCα and purified Rab37 in conjunction with mass spectrometry analysis and site-direct mutagenesis assay to identify the T172 residue of Rab37 as the site that is phosphorylated by PKCα (Figures 2 and 4). However, T172 is not within a part of linear PKC consensus sequences. Notably, new strategies with advanced chemical biology, mass spectrometry and proteomics have revealed that many protein kinase substrates are phosphorylated on residues that are not within the software-predicted linear consensus motifs [28–30]. Instead, the phosphorylation sites recognized by kinases occur within a region that is created by structure-based non-linear consensus motif [31]. Thus, it is speculated that the sequence surrounding T172 on Rab37 may create a structure-based consensus motif. Further structure biology studies will clarify how PKCα recognizes sequence flanking T172 residue on Rab37.
PKCα has long been recognized as an oncoprotein in several types of cancer by regulating tumor growth and progression [32–36]. Both of our cell-based and animal studies revealed that phospho-mimetic mutant of Rab37 at T172, the substrate site of PKCα, profoundly enhanced cell motility and lung metastasis (Figures 4–6). These results link the oncogenic signaling of PKCα to attenuation of metastasis suppressive function of Rab37.
In conclusion, our study provides a new mechanistic insight into the regulation of Rab37 activity by PKCα-dependent phosphorylation leading to inhibition of Rab37-mediated exocytosis of anti-migratory factor/cargo and thus facilitating cell motility and cancer metastasis. Phosphorylation on T172 of Rab37 significantly suppresses its binding affinity for GTP. New diagnostic and therapeutic strategies based on detection of Rab37 phosphorylation and inhibitors against phosphorylated Rab37 could improve the survival in lung cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture and reagents
Human lung cancer cell line PC-14 was obtained from Dr. Pan-Chyr Yang (Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan). A549 was purchased from ATCC. Stable expression of FLAG-tagged WT-, active Q89L- and inactive T43N-Rab37 PC-14 cells were generated as described previously [18]. The small interfering RNAs pool containing 5′-UAAGGAACCACAAGCAGUA-3′, 5′-UUAUAGGGAUCUGAAGUUA-3′, 5′-GAAGGGUUCUCGUAUGUCA-3′, 5′-UCACUGCUCUAUGGACUUA-3′ (Dharmacon, DE, USA) was used to knockdown PKCα. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and conventional PKC inhibitor (Go6976) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro kinase assay
Phospho-deficient and -mimetic mutants of Rab37 were generated by PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. Serine (S) or threonine (T) was mutated to alanine (A) or to aspartate (D). The primer sequences used and PCR reactions are listed in Supplementary Table 1. All constructs were verified by sequencing. The resulting products were then transformed into E.coli. To analyze protein phosphorylation level, the GST-fused Rab37 proteins (Rab37-WT or Rab37-T172A) and recombinant PKCα (Millipore, MA, USA) were incubated with [γ-32P]ATP followed by autoradiography or by Western blot using antibody against p-S/T peptides (Supplementary Table 2).
Vesicle isolation, immunoprecipitation and cellular fractionation
Vesicle isolation protocol was modified from Hendrix’s report [15]. In brief, cells (2 × 108) were sonicated and supernatants were obtained by centrifugation (3,000 g for 10 min at 4°C) and vesicles were enriched from supernatants by high speed centrifugation (30,000 g for 60 min at 4°C) using a 40-Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). The vesicles-containing solution (800 μg) was incubated with anti-Flag antibody to isolate Rab37-specific vesicles and the cargos in vesicles were analyzed by immunoblotting using indicated antibodies (Supplementary Table 2). For cellular fractionation, intact cells suspended in the lysis buffer (25 mM Hepes, pH6.5, 250 mM sucrose, 1mM EDTA and protease inhibitor cocktail) were pelleted by centrifugation (250 g for 10 min). The cytoplasmic (supernatant) and membrane (pellet) fractions were then obtained by centrifugation at 16000 g for 60 min at 4°C.
Confocal, immuno-electron microscopy (immuno-EM), and total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) imaging
For confocal analysis, cells (1 × 105) were fixed and then incubated with primary antibodies against Rab37 and TIMP1. After incubation with secondary fluorescent antibodies, the images were obtained using Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope. For immuno-EM analysis, primary antibodies and the conjugated 10 or 15 nm gold particles were listed in Supplementary Table 2. For TIRF analysis, cells expressing WT-Rab37 were transiently transfected with GFP-TIMP1 for 24 h before image analysis. To capture the Rab37 trafficking events, we tracked each vesicle trafficking distance with trackIT software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Immunoblotting
Cells were lysed in 1× RIPA lysis buffer with a cocktail of antiproteases (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), equal amounts of total cellular extracts were electrophoresed by SDS-PAGE and transferred on to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Primary antibodies used for immunoblotting are list in Supplementary Table 2.
Migration and invasion assays
For transwell migration and invasion assays, 1 × 105 cells were seeded onto the upper chamber with or without Matrigel (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and cultured for 16 h. Cells attached on the reverse side of the membrane were then fixed and stained. Ten random views were photographed and quantified.
Experimental metastasis assays in vivo
BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Laboratory Animal Center of National Cheng Kung University. All experimental procedures involving the use and care of mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of National Cheng Kung University (#104165). All protocols were performed according to the guidelines of “Law Concerning the Protection and Control of Animals” and “Animal Protection Act”. Mice were divided into three groups including control EV cells, WT-Rab37 cells, and T172D-Rab37 cells. Cells were resuspended in serum-free medium (2 × 106 cells per 200 ml) and injected into BALB/c nude mice via the tail vein. Mice were sacrificed after 6 weeks and lung tissues were resected, fixed and embedded in paraffin for histological H&E and immunohistochemistry staining using indicated antibodies (Supplementary Table 2).
Clinical samples and information
We recruited 158 lung cancer patients from National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH), Taiwan after obtaining appropriate institutional review and informed consent from patients. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of NCKUH (B-ER-103-369). All clinical samples used were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Paraffin sections were collected for immunohistochemistry analysis. Overall survival was calculated from the day of surgery to the date of death or the last follow-up. The end of the follow-up period was defined as June 2016. The mean follow-up period was 64.8 months (range 9–103 months).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by Student’s t test. Data shown were representatives of at least three independent experiments unless indicated otherwise. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare the correlation of between PKCα, TIMP1 and Rab37 expression levels and their association with clinicopatholgical parameters in lung cancer patients. Overall survival curves were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Cox regression comparison was performed to analyze the relative risk for poor outcome in patients. Data represented mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FIGURES, TABLES AND VIDEOS
Acknowledgments
We thank the transmission electron microscope core at National Cheng Kung University for technical support. We acknowledge Dr. Hsiao-Sheng Liu (Department of Microbiology and Immunology at National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan) and Dr. Hung-Chi Cheng (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan) for help and advice throughout this work.
Abbreviations
- TIMP1
tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1
- PKCα
protein kinase Cα
- TSP1
thrombospondin-1
- CIP
calf intestinal phosphatase
- PMA
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
- CM
conditioned medium
- EM
electron microscopy
- TIRF
total internal reflection fluorescence
- GAP
GTPase-activating proteins
- GEF
guanine nucleotide exchange factors
Author contributions
Y.C.W. and C.W.C conceived the project idea, designed the studies, and supervised all aspects of the project. H.T.T., T.H.L. and Y.A.T. designed and carried experiments and analyzed data. C.H.T. performed and analyzed cell experiments. P.J.L and W.W.L. provided clinical samples. Y.C.W. and H.T.T. wrote the manuscript with edits from all authors. Y.C.W. and C.W.C. obtained funding.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
FUNDING
This work was supported in part by grants MOST105-2320-B-006-007, NHRI-EX104-10202BI, and MOHW105-TDU-B-211-124-003 (Y-C Wang) and by grants from the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R. O. C. and the aim for the Top University Project to the National Cheng Kung University (C-W Chiang).
REFERENCES
- 1.Stenmark H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:513–525. doi: 10.1038/nrm2728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zerial M, McBride H. Rab proteins as membrane organizers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:107–117. doi: 10.1038/35052055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goldenring JR. A central role for vesicle trafficking in epithelial neoplasia: intracellular highways to carcinogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:813–820. doi: 10.1038/nrc3601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bhuin T, Roy JK. Rab proteins: the key regulators of intracellular vesicle transport. Exp Cell Res. 2014;328:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Segawa T, Hazeki K, Nigorikawa K, Morioka S, Guo Y, Takasuga S, Asanuma K, Hazeki O. Inpp5e increases the Rab5 association and phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate accumulation at the phagosome through an interaction with Rab20. Biochem J. 2014;464:365–375. doi: 10.1042/BJ20140916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hayes GL, Brown FC, Haas AK, Nottingham RM, Barr FA, Pfeffer SR. Multiple Rab GTPase binding sites in GCC185 suggest a model for vesicle tethering at the trans-Golgi. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:209–217. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-07-0740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pfeffer SR. Structural clues to Rab GTPase functional diversity. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:15485–15488. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R500003200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luo ML, Gong C, Chen CH, Hu H, Huang P, Zheng M, Yao Y, Wei S, Wulf G, Lieberman J, Zhou XZ, Song E, Lu KP. The Rab2A GTPase promotes breast cancer stem cells and tumorigenesis via Erk signaling activation. Cell Rep. 2015;11:111–124. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yang J, Liu W, Lu X, Fu Y, Li L, Luo Y. High expression of small GTPase Rab3D promotes cancer progression and metastasis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:11125–38. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3575. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bravo-Cordero JJ, Marrero-Diaz R, Megías D, Genís L, García-Grande A, García MA, Arroyo AG, Montoya MC. MT1-MMP proinvasive activity is regulated by a novel Rab8-dependent exocytic pathway. EMBO J. 2007;26:1499–1510. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yoon SO, Shin S, Mercurio AM. Hypoxia stimulates carcinoma invasion by stabilizing microtubules and promoting the Rab11 trafficking of the alpha6beta4 integrin. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2761–2769. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pellinen T, Arjonen A, Vuoriluoto K, Kallio K, Fransen JA, Ivaska J. Small GTPase Rab21 regulates cell adhesion and controls endosomal traffic of beta1-integrins. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:767–780. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200509019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hou Q, Wu YH, Grabsch H, Zhu Y, Leong SH, Ganesan K, Cross D, Tan LK, Tao J, Gopalakrishnan V, Tang BL, Kon OL, Tan P. Integrative genomics identifies RAB23 as an invasion mediator gene in diffuse-type gastric cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4623–4630. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cheng KW, Lahad JP, Kuo WL, Lapuk A, Yamada K, Auersperg N, Liu J, Smith-McCune K, Lu KH, Fishman D, Gray JW, Mills GB. The RAB25 small GTPase determines aggressiveness of ovarian and breast cancers. Nat Med. 2004;10:1251–1256. doi: 10.1038/nm1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hendrix A, Maynard D, Pauwels P, Braems G, Denys H, Van den Broecke R, Lambert J, Van Belle S, Cocquyt V, Gespach C, Bracke M, Seabra MC, Gahl WA, et al. Effect of the secretory small GTPase Rab27B on breast cancer growth, invasion, and metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:866–880. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wheeler DB, Zoncu R, Root DE, Sabatini DM, Sawyers CL. Identification of an oncogenic RAB protein. Science. 2015;350:211–217. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu CY, Tseng RC, Hsu HS, Wang YC, Hsu MY. Frequent down-regulation of hRAB37 in metastatic tumor by genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2009;63:360–367. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tsai CH, Cheng HC, Wang YS, Lin P, Jen J, Kuo IY, Chang YH, Liao PC, Chen RH, Yuan WC, Hsu YS, Yang MH, Hsu MT, et al. Small GTPase Rab37 targets tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 for exocytosis and thus suppresses tumour metastasis. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4804. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tzeng HT, Tsai CH, Yen YT, Cheng HC, Chen YC, Pu SW, Wang YS, Shan YS, Tseng YL, Su WC, Lai WW, Wu LW, Wang YC. Dysregulation of Rab37-mediated cross-talk between cancer cells and endothelial cells via thrombospondin-1 promotes tumor neovasculature and metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:2335–2345. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ong ST, Freeley M, Skubis-Zegadło J, Fazil MH, Kelleher D, Fresser F, Baier G, Verma NK, Long A. Phosphorylation of Rab5a protein by protein kinase Cε is crucial for T-cell migration. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:19420–19434. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.545863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pavarotti M, Capmany A, Vitale N, Colombo MI, Damiani MT. Rab11 is phosphorylated by classical and novel protein kinase C isoenzymes upon sustained phorbol ester activation. Biol Cell. 2012;104:102–115. doi: 10.1111/boc.201100062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fitzgerald ML, Reed GL. Rab6 is phosphorylated in thrombin-activated platelets by a protein kinase C-dependent mechanism: effects on GTP/GDP binding and cellular distribution. Biochem J. 1999;342:353–360. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cherfils J, Zeghouf M. Regulation of small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:269–309. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00003.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Scheffzek K, Ahmadian MR, Wittinghofer A. GTPase-activating proteins: helping hands to complement an active site. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:257–262. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01224-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ayad N, Hull M, Mellman I. Mitotic phosphorylation of rab4 prevents binding to a specific receptor on endosome membranes. EMBO J. 1997;16:4497–4507. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.15.4497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van der Sluijs P, Hull M, Huber LA, Mâle P, Goud B, Mellman I. Reversible phosphorylation--dephosphorylation determines the localization of rab4 during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 1992;11:4379–4389. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05538.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lai YC, Kondapalli C, Lehneck R, Procter JB, Dill BD, Woodroof HI, Gourlay R, Peggie M, Macartney TJ, Corti O, Campbell DG, Itzen A, Trost M, et al. Phosphoproteomic screening identifies Rab GTPases as novel downstream targets of PINK1. EMBO J. 2015;34:2840–2861. doi: 10.15252/embj.201591593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kettenbach AN, Schweppe DR, Faherty BK, Pechenick D, Pletnev AA, Gerber SA. Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifies substrates and functional modules of Aurora and Polo-like kinase activities in mitotic cells. Sci Signal. 2011;4:rs5. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Blethrow JD, Glavy JS, Morgan DO, Shokat KM. Covalent capture of kinase-specific phosphopeptides reveals Cdk1-cyclin B substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1442–1447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708966105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Johnson LN. Substrates of mitotic kinases. Sci Signal. 2011;4:pe31. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Duarte ML, Pena DA, Nunes Ferraz FA, Berti DA, Paschoal Sobreira TJ, Costa-Junior HM, Abdel Baqui MM, Disatnik MH, Xavier-Neto J, Lopes de Oliveira PS, Schechtman D. Protein folding creates structure-based, noncontiguous consensus phosphorylation motifs recognized by kinases. Sci Signal. 2014;7:ra105. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2005412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nakashima S. Protein kinase C alpha (PKC alpha): Regulation and biological function. J Biochem. 2002;132:669–675. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Qin L, Yin YT, Zheng FJ, Peng LX, Yang CF, Bao YN, Liang YY, Li XJ, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Li AH, Zou RH, Pei XQ, et al. WNT5A promotes stemness characteristics in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells leading to metastasis and tumorigenesis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:10239–52. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3518. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kyuno D, Kojima T, Yamaguchi H, Ito T, Kimura Y, Imamura M, Takasawa A, Murata M, Tanaka S, Hirata K, Sawada N. Protein kinase Cα inhibitor protects against downregulation of claudin-1 during epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:1232–1243. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wu B, Zhou H, Hu L, Mu Y, Wu Y. Involvement of PKCα activation in TF/VIIa/PAR2-induced proliferation, migration, and survival of colon cancer cell SW620. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:837–846. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0614-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Walsh MF, Woo RK, Gomez R, Basson MD. Extracellular pressure stimulates colon cancer cell proliferation via a mechanism requiring PKC and tyrosine kinase signals. Cell Prolif. 2004;37:427–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2004.00324.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.