Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery logoLink to World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
. 2017 Dec 27;9(12):288–292. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i12.288

Ectopic gastrointestinal variceal bleeding with portal hypertension

Keita Minowa 1,2, Shuhei Komatsu 3,4, Kenichiro Takashina 5,6, Sachie Tanaka 7, Tatsuya Kumano 8, Kenichiro Imura 9, Katsumi Shimomura 10, Jun Ikeda 11, Fumihiro Taniguchi 12, Yasuo Ueshima 13, Tecchuu Lee 14, Eito Ikeda 15, Eigo Otsuji 16, Yasuhiro Shioaki 17
PMCID: PMC5752964  PMID: 29359035

Abstract

Massive gastrointestinal bleeding from gastrointestinal varices is one of the most serious complications in patients with portal hypertension. However, if no bleeding point can be detected by endoscopy in the predilection sites of gastrointestinal varices, such as the esophagus and stomach, ectopic gastrointestinal variceal bleeding should be considered as a differential diagnosis. Herein, we report a case of ectopic ileal variceal bleeding in a 57-year-old woman, which was successfully diagnosed by multi-detector row CT (MDCT) and angiography and treated by segmental ileum resection. To date, there have been no consensus for the treatment of ectopic ileal variceal bleeding. This review was designed to clarify the clinical characteristics of patients with ectopic ileal variceal and discuss possible treatment strategies. From the PubMed database and our own database, we reviewed 21 consecutive cases of ileal variceal bleeding diagnosed from 1982 to 2017. MDCT and angiography is useful for the rapid examination and surgical resection of an affected lesion and is a safe and effective treatment strategy to avoid further bleeding.

Keywords: Ectopic gastrointestinal bleeding, Ileal varix, Portal hypertension


Core tip: Massive gastrointestinal bleeding from gastrointestinal varices is one of the most serious complications in patients with portal hypertension. If no bleeding point can be detected by endoscopy in the predilection sites of gastrointestinal varices, ectopic gastrointestinal variceal bleeding should be considered as a differential diagnosis. We report here a 57-year-old female case of ectopic ileal variceal bleeding, which were diagnosed by multi-detector row CT (MDCT) and its angiography and treated by segmental ileum resection. From the review results of previous reports, MDCT and its angiography is a rapid and useful examination. Moreover, surgical resection of responsible lesion is safe and effective treatment strategy to avoid further bleeding.

INTRODUCTION

Massive gastrointestinal bleeding from a gastrointestinal varix is one of the most serious complications in patients with portal hypertension. However, if the point of continuous bleeding in the predilection sites of a gastrointestinal varix, such as the esophagus and stomach, is not found and no further strategy for the accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of the bleeding point exists, the condition may become life threatening.

Lebrec et al[1] classified the gastrointestinal varices other than those of the esophagus and stomach as ectopic varices. Ectopic gastrointestinal varices were reported in the sites of the duodenum, small intestine, colon, rectum, peristomal, biliary, peritoneal, umbilical, and other locations. Ectopic gastrointestinal varices cause an unusual hemorrhage and account for 5% of all variceal bleeding. In particular, ectopic ileal variceal bleeding is the major type of ectopic gastrointestinal variceal bleeding[2]. Herein, we report a case of ectopic ileal variceal bleeding, which was diagnosed by MDCT and angiography and was surgically treated. Moreover, we reviewed previous case reports regarding the clinical behaviors, diagnosis, and treatment strategies of ectopic ileal variceal bleeding, including our cases diagnosed between 1982 and 2017 from the PubMed database.

CASE REPORT

A 57-year-old Asian woman with autoimmune portal hypertension due to polymyositis was admitted to our hospital with a 2-d history of hematochezia. She had a history of esophageal variceal rupture, which had been treated by endoscopy 3 years before. At admission, she had a blood pressure of 92/58 mmHg, heart rate of 85/min, respiratory rate of 16/min, and body temperature of 35.2 °C. Although she was pale and showed conjunctival pallor, and there was no jaundice, abdominal pain, or shifting dullness. Laboratory data were as follows: hemoglobin 7.3 g/dL, hematocrit 23.4%, platelets 112000/mm3, prothrombin time 98%, serum albumin 3.5 g/dL, total bilirubin 1.1 mg/dL, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase 35/51 IU/L. Hepatitis B surface antigen was positive and hepatitis C virus antibody was negative. There was no encephalopathy. Her Child-Pugh score was 6 (class A).

We performed an emergent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, which showed a mild esophageal varix without bleeding. However, lower gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a large blood clot at the ileocecum, but there was no active bleeding lesion during the endoscopy. MDCT showed no definitive liver cirrhosis, but dilation of the hepatic portal vein and umbilical vein and splenomegaly and portosystemic collaterals indicated portal hypertension. In addition, enhanced MDCT and MDCT and angiography revealed the presence of an ileal varix, which showed no active bleeding into the abdominal cavity. In particular, the ileal varix had a portosystemic shunt via the superior mesenteric vein into the right ovarian vein.

She was treated conservatively for 2 d with a blood transfusion. On the 3rd day after admission, she had massive hematochezia. We performed a second MDCT and angiography and diagnosed the patient as hematochezia due to massive ileal varix bleeding because there was a massive coagula at the distal ileal lumen of the ileal varix. We performed emergent segmental ileal resection, which included the ileal varix, via a small laparotomy (Figure 1). The varix was located at the 20-cm proximal portion of the ileocecal valve. Her postoperative condition was uneventful. She had no further bleeding and was discharged on the 8th day after surgery.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Ileal varices (arrow) were detected using multi-detector row CT and angiography and were resected by laparotomy.

DISCUSSION

Portal hypertensive enteropathy is present in 5%-11% of patients with portal hypertension and often gives rise to gastrointestinal varices in the esophagus and stomach, which cause active bleeding[3]. Gastrointestinal varices other than those of the esophagogastric area are rare and are classified as ectopic gastrointestinal varices. Ectopic gastrointestinal varices occur at sites such as the duodenum, small intestine, colon, rectum, peristomal, biliary, peritoneal, umbilical, and other locations. Various related factors of an ectopic gastrointestinal varix such as portal hypertension due to cirrhosis, portal vein thrombosis, a history of abdominal surgery, chronic intraperitoneal inflammation, and hematochezia have been reported[4,5].

An ileal varix is the major type of ectopic gastrointestinal varix. In a review 169 cases of ectopic gastrointestinal variceal bleeding, 17% was the highest rate of bleeding among all sites and was derived from jejunal and ileal varices[2]. Ileal varices are associated with a history of abdominal surgery and adhesions[6]. Presumably, abdominal surgery and intraperitoneal inflammation may cause adhesion of the intestinal tract. Then, collateral vessels within the adhesion may give rise to ectopic intestinal varices, particularly, in the jejunum and ileum[7]. Ectopic ileal varices most commonly flow into systemic circulation through the gonadal veins and less commonly through branches of the internal iliac veins[7]. In our case, there were various compatible features such as autoimmune portal hypertension and previous surgeries for appendicitis and hematochezia. Moreover, a portosystemic shunt, which flowed from the superior mesenteric vein into the right ovarian vein, was detected.

From the PubMed database including our own, we reviewed 21 consecutive cases of ileal variceal bleeding diagnosed from 1982 to 2017. The clinical features of 21 patients are shown in Table 1. Patients with ileal variceal bleeding consisted of 5 male and 16 female patients with a median age of 57 years (range 33-80 years). From the medical history, 71.4% (15/21) of patients were associated with portal hypertension due to liver cirrhosis. Previous abdominal surgery was noted in 57.1% (12/21) of patients. Regarding the diagnosis, 61.9% (13/21) of patients were diagnosed by SMA angiography. Capsule endoscopy was used in two cases. However, recent cases were mainly diagnosed by MDCT or MDCT and angiography and treated by surgical resection with no further bleeding. Surgical resection was performed in 76.1% (16/21) of all patients. Some recent patients underwent interventional radiology (IVR) treatment methods such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)[8-10] and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO)[11,12].

Table 1.

Summary of the reported ileal variceal bleeding

Case Year Age Sex Past history Previous abdominal surgery Diagnosis Treatment Outcome
1 1982 Falchuk 52 F liver cirrhosis Cholecystectomy SMA angiography Partial enterectomy Dead
2 1984 Shimada 49 M liver cirrhosis Ruputured esophageal varix SMA angiography Partial enterectomy Alive
3 1986 Hojhus 80 F Periappendicular abscess (-) SMA angiography Partial enterectomy Dead
4 1986 Arst 56 F Liver cirrhosis (-) Laparotomy Ileocolectomy Dead
5 1990 Lewis 72 F Liver cirrhosis Hysterectomy SMA angiography Ileocolectomy Alive
6 1994 Kurihara 43 M (-) (-) SMA angiography Partial enterectomy Alive
7 1997 Ahn 54 M Liver cirrhosis (-) SMA angiography Ileocolectomy Dead
8 1999 Ohtani 66 F Liver cirrhosis Ectopic pregnancy SMA angiography Partial enterectomy Alive
9 2001 Kobayashi 62 F Hepatocellular carcinoma Hysterectomy SMA angiography Ligation of ileocecal and ovarian vein Alive
10 2006 Ueda 72 F Liver cirrhosis Abdominal aortic aneurysm MDCT Partial enterectomy Alive
11 2007 Lopez 56 F Liver cirrhosis Pelvic surgery SMA angiography TIPS Alive
12 2007 Mashimo 33 F Liver cirrhosis Endometriosis SMA angiography Partial enterectomy Alive
13 2009 Suzuki 74 F Liver cirrhosis Acute appendicitis MDCT Partial enterectomy Alive
14 2009 Traina 58 F Liver cirrhosis (-) ES Sclerotherapy + TIPS Alive
15 2009 Sato 55 M Liver cirrhosis Laparotomy for colonic tumor Retrograde transvenous venography BRTO Alive
16 2010 Konishi 54 F (-) (-) CE Partial enterectomy Alive
17 2011 Ambiru 62 F Liver cirrhosis Ectopic pregnancy MDCT Partial enterectomy Alive
18 2011 Castagna 70 M Liver cirrhosis (-) CE TIPS Alive
19 2013 Vamadevan 48 F Liver cirrhosis (-) MDCT TIPS Alive
20 2015 Garcia 74 F Venous thromboembolism (-) MDCT Partial enterectomy Alive
21 2017 Our case 57 F Portal hypertension Acute appendicitis MDCT Partial enterectomy Alive

CE: Capsule endoscopy; MDCT: Multi-detector raw computed tomography; ES: Enteroscopy; TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; BRTO: Balloon occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration.

There were no patients with re-bleeding in previous reports of ileal variceal bleeding. However, re-bleeding rates of 23%-39% have been reported in TIPS and 5%-16.6% in BRTO in all reports of ectopic gastrointestinal variceal bleeding[13-16]. Although non-invasive treatment such as IVR may be desirable for ectopic gastrointestinal variceal bleeding in high-risk patients with co-morbidities, surgical resection of an affected intestine is currently a safe and effective treatment strategy to avoid further re-bleeding. Moreover, laparoscopic surgical resection of an affected intestine could be possible effective strategy as a minimally invasive procedure (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The management algorythm for massive gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension. MDCT: Multi-detector raw computed tomography; TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; BRTO: Baloon occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration.

Ectopic gastrointestinal varices bleeding, especially ileal variceal bleeding, in patients with portal hypertension might be considered as a differential diagnosis if upper or lower endoscopy cannot detect a bleeding point such as in the esophagus or stomach. MDCT or MDCT angiography is useful for the rapid examination and surgical resection of an affected ileum and is a safe and effective treatment strategy to avoid further bleeding.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Case characteristics

A 57-year-old Asian woman with autoimmune portal hypertension due to polymyositis was admitted to our hospital with a 2-d history of hematochezia. She had a history of esophageal variceal rupture, which had been treated by endoscopy 3 years before.

Clinical diagnosis

On the 3rd day after admission, she had massive hematochezia. The authors performed a second multi-detector row CT (MDCT) and angiography and diagnosed as massive ileal varix bleeding because there was a massive coagula at the distal ileal lumen of the ileal varix.

Differential diagnosis

There was no differential diagnosis because upper and lower endoscopic examinations could not detect the responsible lesion.

Laboratory diagnosis

Laboratory diagnosis was a severe anemia with hemoglobin 7.3 g/dL and hematocrit 23.4% because other data showed no apparent disorder.

Imaging diagnosis

Imaging diagnosis by MDCT and its angiography was massive ileal varix bleeding because there was a massive coagula at the distal ileal lumen of the ileal varix.

Pathological diagnosis

Pathological diagnosis was the leal varix.

Treatment

The authors performed emergent segmental ileal resection, which included the ileal varix, via a small laparotomy. The varix was located at the 20-cm proximal portion of the ileocecal valve.

Related reports

Jejunal varices as a cause of massive gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 514-517.

Term explanation

The authors used common terms, which were used in previous reports.

Experiences and lessons

Ectopic gastrointestinal variceal bleeding might be considered as a differential diagnosis if upper or lower endoscopy could not detect bleeding point. From the review results of previous reports including our case, MDCT and its angiography is a rapid and useful examination. Moreover, surgical resection of responsible lesion is safe and effective treatment strategy to avoid further bleeding.

Footnotes

Informed consent statement: Subject provided signed informed consent. Patients were treated according to the provisions of the Helsinki criteria to conduct research involving human subjects.

Conflict-of-interest statement: We have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: Japan

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): A

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C, C, C

Grade D (Fair): D

Grade E (Poor): 0

Peer-review started: August 27, 2017

First decision: September 25, 2017

Article in press: November 11, 2017

P- Reviewer: Boukerrouche A, Dinc B, Hoyuela C, Katuchova J, Tomazic A S- Editor: Ji FF L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ

Contributor Information

Keita Minowa, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan; Emergency and Critical Care Center, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Shuhei Komatsu, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan; Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. skomatsu@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.

Kenichiro Takashina, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan; Emergency and Critical Care Center, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Sachie Tanaka, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Tatsuya Kumano, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Kenichiro Imura, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Katsumi Shimomura, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Jun Ikeda, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Fumihiro Taniguchi, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Yasuo Ueshima, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Tecchuu Lee, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Eito Ikeda, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.

Yasuhiro Shioaki, Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.

References

  • 1.Lebrec D, Benhamou JP. Ectopic varices in portal hypertension. Clin Gastroenterol. 1985;14:105–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Norton ID, Andrews JC, Kamath PS. Management of ectopic varices. Hepatology. 1998;28:1154–1158. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Palma GD, Rega M, Masone S, Persico F, Siciliano S, Patrone F, Matantuono L, Persico G. Mucosal abnormalities of the small bowel in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a capsule endoscopy study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:529–534. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)01588-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yuki N, Kubo M, Noro Y, Kasahara A, Hayashi N, Fusamoto H, Ito T, Kamada T. Jejunal varices as a cause of massive gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:514–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Joo YE, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS, Kim HR, Kim SJ. Massive gastrointestinal bleeding from jejunal varices. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:775–778. doi: 10.1007/s005350070037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kotfila R, Trudeau W. Extraesophageal varices. Dig Dis. 1998;16:232–241. doi: 10.1159/000016871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Akhter NM, Haskal ZJ. Diagnosis and management of ectopic varices. Ganstrointestinal Intervention. 2012;1:3–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Castagna E, Cardellicchio A, Pulitanò R, Manca A, Fenoglio L. Bleeding ileal varices: a rare cause of chronic anemia in liver cirrhosis. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6:271–273. doi: 10.1007/s11739-010-0466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.López-Benítez R, Seidensticker P, Richter GM, Stampfl U, Hallscheidt P. [Case report: massive lower intestinal bleeding from ileal varices: treatment with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS)] Radiologe. 2007;47:407–410. doi: 10.1007/s00117-005-1279-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vamadevan S, Haltmeier T, Groebli Y. Portosystemic shunt via the superior mesenteric and right ovarian vein leading to small intestine bleeding in alcoholic liver cirrhosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:pii: bcr2013008959. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-008959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sato T, Yamazaki K, Toyota J, Karino Y, Ohmura T, Akaike J. Ileal Varices Treated with Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration. Gastroenterology Res. 2009;2:122–125. doi: 10.4021/gr2009.04.1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Konishi H, Kikuchi S, Miyashita A, Ichikawa D, Fujiwara H, Kubota T, Ochiai T, Kokuba Y, Yasukawa S, Yanagisawa A, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for obscure idiopathic ileal varices diagnosed by capsule endoscopy and double balloon endoscopy: report of a case. Surg Today. 2010;40:1088–1092. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4180-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vidal V, Joly L, Perreault P, Bouchard L, Lafortune M, Pomier-Layrargues G. Usefulness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of bleeding ectopic varices in cirrhotic patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:216–219. doi: 10.1007/s00270-004-0346-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vangeli M, Patch D, Terreni N, Tibballs J, Watkinson A, Davies N, Burroughs AK. Bleeding ectopic varices--treatment with transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) and embolisation. J Hepatol. 2004;41:560–566. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hashimoto N, Akahoshi T, Yoshida D, Kinjo N, Konishi K, Uehara H, Nagao Y, Kawanaka H, Tomikawa M, Maehara Y. The efficacy of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration on small intestinal variceal bleeding. Surgery. 2010;148:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saad WE, Wagner CC, Lippert A, Al-Osaimi A, Davies MG, Matsumoto AH, Angle JF, Caldwell S. Protective value of TIPS against the development of hydrothorax/ascites and upper gastrointestinal bleeding after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1612–1619. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES