The authors of the published paper [1] would like to correct Table 1. The third line in the first column should have been 20 (normal volunteers) and the etiologic agent in the second column should have been “None” instead of C. gattii, VGI. Therefore, Table 1 should read as follows:
Table 1.
Detection of anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies in plasma from Chinese immunocompetent, otherwise healthy Cryptococcosis patients with CNS infection [26].
| No. Patient Samples | Etiologic Agent | Anti-GM-CSF AB |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | C. neoformans, VNl, VNlll | 0 |
| 1 | C. gattii, VGl | 1 |
| 20 (Normal volunteers) | None | 1 |
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to readers.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Reference
- 1.Kwon-Chung K.J., Saijo T. Is Cryptococcus gattii a Primary Pathogen? J. Fungi. 2015;1:154–167. doi: 10.3390/jof1020154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
