Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2018 Jan 4;6(1):e01399-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01399-17

Draft Genome Sequence of USA100 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain 209

Yingfeng Chen a, Heidi A Crosby b, Wilhelm F Oosthuysen II b, Daniel J Diekema c, Scott T Kelley a, Alexander R Horswill b,d,
PMCID: PMC5754489  PMID: 29301880

ABSTRACT

USA100 strains are significant contributors to the overall burden of health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Strain 209 is a representative MRSA isolate that serves as a model organism for agr type II studies and USA100 virulence assessments. We present a draft genome sequence of this strain.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

USA100 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates represent a major portion of health care-associated MRSA infections. In 2005/2006, USA100 strains caused 53.6% of invasive MRSA infections, more than any other type of MRSA strain (1). In more recent years, this proportion has decreased (2), but USA100 remains a prominent cause of invasive infections, and outcomes for these infections are similar to, if not worse than, those caused by other MRSA strains (3). USA100 strains also typically exhibit a broader spectrum of antibiotic resistance than other isolates (1, 4). There is recent evidence that USA100 strains are moving away from hospitals and into community settings (5), potentially creating new reservoirs for opportunistic infection.

To gain insight into genomic features and virulence traits of USA100 strains, we selected a representative isolate obtained from an MRSA surveillance program at the University of Iowa. Strain 209 (also called IA209) is a throat culture isolate that is spa type 002, SCCmec type II, Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) negative, and classified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as USA100. The strain is resistant to the antibiotics oxacillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and levofloxacin. Like other USA100s, strain 209 has an agr type II system and makes an AIP-II signal (6). In vitro testing shows that strain 209 has a robust agr system and is a more clinically relevant representative for agr type II studies than the historical 502A isolate (7). Strain 209 is able to cause sepsis, infective endocarditis, and pneumonia in rabbit models of infection (8, 9), indicating that the isolate has functional mechanisms of pathogenesis.

To isolate genomic DNA, cells were lysed with lysostaphin and DNA was purified using the Puregene yeast/bacteria kit B (Qiagen). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Hyper Prep library kit (Kapa Biosystems) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform using a 250-bp paired-end format, resulting in a total of 5,320,190 reads. The raw sequences were preprocessed using Cutadapt version 1.14 to trim adaptors (10) and using Prinseq version 0.20.4 to perform quality filtering (11). Initial genome assembly was performed with the SPAdes version 3.10.0 genome assembler program (12). Contigs less than 1,000 bp in length and with a coverage depth lower than 10× were excluded, which resulted in 15 contigs with a combined total of 2,769,008 bp (N50, 324,561 bp) and with a G+C content of 32.72%. The largest contig was 753,539 bp long. Contigs were extended using AlignGraph, an algorithm for secondary de novo genome assembly, by aligning contigs and initial raw sequences to closely related references (13). S. aureus N315 was identified as the closest related assembled genome, and with this genome AlignGraph was able to extend one contig and combine five other contigs into two contigs. The final scaffolds included 12 contigs with a combined total of 2,773,925 bp and a G+C content of 32.71%. The N50 value for the genome was 444,128 bp. A total of 2,860 genes were predicted by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (14).

Accession number(s).

The draft genome sequence of strain 209 was deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number NTCY00000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Data presented herein were obtained at the Genomics Division of the Iowa Institute of Human Genetics, which is supported in part by the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. A.R.H. is supported by a merit award from the Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX002711).

Footnotes

Citation Chen Y, Crosby HA, Oosthuysen WF, II, Diekema DJ, Kelley ST, Horswill AR. 2018. Draft genome sequence of USA100 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain 209. Genome Announc 6:e01399-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01399-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Limbago B, Fosheim GE, Schoonover V, Crane CE, Nadle J, Petit S, Heltzel D, Ray SM, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Schaffner W, Mu Y, Fridkin SK; Active Bacterial Core surveillance MRSA Investigators. 2009. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in 2005 and 2006 from patients with invasive disease: a population-based analysis. J Clin Microbiol 47:1344–1351. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02264-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carrel M, Perencevich EN, David MZ. 2015. USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 2000–2013. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1973–1980. doi: 10.3201/eid2111.150452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lessa FC, Mu Y, Ray SM, Dumyati G, Bulens S, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim G, DeVries AS, Schaffner W, Nadle J, Gershman K, Fridkin SK; Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs), MRSA Investigators of the Emerging Infections Program . 2012. Impact of USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on clinical outcomes of patients with pneumonia or central line-associated bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis 55:232–241. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Appelbaum PC. 2007. Microbiology of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 45(Suppl 3):S165–S170. doi: 10.1086/519474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roberts JC. 2014. Classification of epidemic community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by anatomical site of isolation. Biomed Res Int 2014:904283. doi: 10.1155/2014/904283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thoendel M, Kavanaugh JS, Flack CE, Horswill AR. 2011. Peptide signaling in the staphylococci. Chem Rev 111:117–151. doi: 10.1021/cr100370n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parker D, Narechania A, Sebra R, Deikus G, Larussa S, Ryan C, Smith H, Prince A, Mathema B, Ratner AJ, Kreiswirth B, Planet PJ. 2014. Genome sequence of bacterial interference strain Staphylococcus aureus 502A. Genome Announc 2:e00284-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00284-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.King JM, Kulhankova K, Stach CS, Vu BG, Salgado-Pabón W. 2016. Phenotypes and virulence among Staphylococcus aureus USA100, USA200, USA300, USA400, and USA600 clonal lineages. mSphere 1:e00071-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00071-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Spaulding AR, Salgado-Pabón W, Merriman JA, Stach CS, Ji Y, Gillman AN, Peterson ML, Schlievert PM. 2014. Vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. J Infect Dis 209:1955–1962. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schmieder R, Edwards R. 2011. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27:863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bao E, Jiang T, Girke T. 2014. AlignGraph: algorithm for secondary de novo genome assembly guided by closely related references. Bioinformatics 30:i319–ii328. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES