Abstract
Cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of death and morbidity, is regulated, among various factors, by inflammation. The level of the metabolite adenosine is augmented under stress, including inflammatory, hypoxic or injurious events. Adenosine has been shown to affect various physiological and pathological processes, largely through one or more of its four types of receptors: the A1 and A3 adenylyl cyclase inhibitory receptors, and the A2A and A2B adenylyl cyclase stimulatory receptors. This article focuses on reviewing common and distinct effects of the two A2-type adenosine receptors on vascular disease, and the mechanisms involved. Understanding the pathogenesis of vascular disease mediated by these receptors is important to the development of therapeutics, and to prevention and management of disease.
Vascular Disease: Overview
Coronary artery disease due to underlying atherosclerotic pathology is a leading cause of death and morbidity. Understanding the pathogenesis of vascular disease mediated by imbalanced lipid metabolism and maladaptive immune responses is a key to the development of therapeutics, prevention and management of disease and its complications.
The pathobiology of atherosclerosis is characterized by an inflammatory-mediated response to vessel wall injury. Stages of atherosclerosis include endothelial activation and dysfunction, contributing to the loss of luminal elastin layer and exposure of proteoglycans, facilitating the sub-endothelial deposition of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). These particles are subjected to oxidative modification by reactive oxygen species or enzymes released from inflammatory cells. Ultimately, oxidized-LDL signals to promote expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cell and secretion of chemokines, initiating immune cell infiltration of the intima. Fatty streaks consist of monocyte-derived macrophage foam cells and lymphocytes filled with lipid. Ultimately fatty streaks can progress to more advanced stages of atherosclerosis and a necrotic core develops from subsequent accumulation of apoptotic cells, debris and cholesterol crystals. A fibrous cap comprised of collagen and smooth muscle cells covers these fibroatheromatous plaques; inflamed caps contain macrophages that are thin and more prone to rupture of shoulder regions bearing maximal mechanical stress. Adventitial inflammation of advanced plaques is mediated by infiltrated T cells and mast cells that secrete proinflammatory cytokines and enzymes (reviewed in 1–4).
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are a huge component of the management of coronary artery disease. The mechanical and cellular consequences of PCIs on atherosclerotic substrates generate a specific response to injury that can initiate and perpetuate restenosis 5. Unlike atherogenesis, restenosis is characterized by a rapid, although self-limiting vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, remodeling of the vasculature, and luminal stenosis. In contrast, atherosclerosis is a chronic progression and depends on the composition and content of circulating lipids. Coronary intervention results in endothelial denudation, exposure of the subendothelium and its prothromobotic surface, thrombosis and ensuing inflammation 6–9. The extent of vascular repair is determined by the initial degree of endothelial damage. Inflammatory response is characterized by initial change in expression of adhesion molecules, monocyte adherence and recruitment following intimal injury 10, 11. Exposure of the subendothelium also drives a thrombotic response mediated by platelet adhesion, activation, aggregation, and the formation of a thrombus. Aggregated, activated platelets secrete various vascular smooth muscle mitogens such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), which contributes to vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation 12, 13. Activated platelets also release thrombin, which serves as a direct activator of circulating platelets, a chemoattractant for monocytes, and stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation directly 14–16. Neointimal hyperplasia is a result of the vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation and their production of excessive extracellular matrix 4, 6, 13, 17.
At sites of vascular injury, platelets are rapidly activated, which points to their potential as therapeutic targets to maintain hemostasis and in the context of the formation of an arterial thrombus. The rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque is followed by platelet adhesion and aggregation, which can contribute to thrombus formation and consequent coronary events, including acute coronary syndromes, stroke and peripheral artery disease 18. Platelet activation also contributes to early atherogenic events 19, 20. Briefly, platelet activation is induced by many platelet receptors and agonists, including the binding of ADP to P2Y1 or P2Y12 receptors, thromboxane A2 to TxA2 receptor, thrombin to PAR-1 and PAR-4 receptors, and collagen to GPVI and GPIbα (reviewed in 21–25). Except for the glycoprotein receptor GPVI, the listed receptors are G-protein coupled receptors, and they signal through Gq to activate phospholipase C-β (PLC-β), excluding the P2Y12 receptor which couples to Gi resulting in the inhibition of cAMP levels. PLC is also activated by collagen, specifically PLCγ2. Subsequent downstream signaling (reviewed in 26, 27) lead to changes in activated platelet conformation and exposure of binding sites for fibrinogen (reviewed in 28–30), an important prerequisite for platelet aggregation. The binding of ligand to GPIbα results in a complex with filamen and changes in the membrane cytoskeleton of platelet, important for adhesive events and the promotion of thrombus growth 31, 32. Adenosine is an important regulatory metabolite that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of vascular disease, including atherosclerosis (eg. 33–35), restenosis (eg. 36, 37), and platelet activation (eg. 38, 39). This review will focus on the role of the A2-type adenosine receptors and their function in atherogenesis, vascular restenosis and platelet activation and aggregation. Their involvement in different steps of pathogenesis and specific cell types points to their therapeutic potential in management and prevention of vascular disease.
Adenosine Production and Metabolism
The metabolite adenosine is generated following an inflammatory, hypoxic or injurious event 40–43, and is an important regulatory component of subsequent events, including: increasing oxygen supply/demand ratio, angiogenesis, ischemic pre- and post-conditioning, and anti-inflammatory actions 44, 45. Adenosine is produced through the catabolism of adenosine triphosphate (ATP); the intracellular levels of ATP are normally in the millimolar range. Following insult to the membrane or pathology involving inflammation, hypoxia or ischemia, there is a drastic elevation of extracellular ATP 46. ATP can be released from cells through nerve stimulation 47, mechanical stress 48 and hypotonic stress 49, and is rapidly degraded by membrane bound enzymes. The hydrolysis of nucleotides is achieved through the following families of enzymes: E-NTPDase, ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (E-NPP), ecto-5′nucelotidase, and alkaline phosphatases (refer to Figure 1). Counteracting kinases can rephosphorylate adenosine, AMP and ADP to ATP, including ecto-adenlyate kinase (AK), and nucleoside disphosphate (NDP) kinase 50. ATP is directly hydrolyzed to AMP by E-NPPs 51. ATP’s dephosphorylation to adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP) and subsequent dephosphorylation of ADP to adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP) are catalyzed by ecto-nucleoside triphosphate dephosphorylases (E-NTPDases), including CD39 52, 53. Extracellular AMP is converted to adenosine by ecto-5′-nucleotidases, including CD73 54. On the other hand, adenosine can be rescued by adenosine kinase to form AMP 55–58. Hypoxic conditions inhibit adenosine kinase, which contributes to elevated levels of extracellular adenosine 59. Finally, intracellular adenosine can also be transported outside the cell. This transport is facilitated by two families of bidirectional transporters: concentrative transporters (CNTs) and equilibrium dependent transporters (ENTs). CNTs utilize a sodium pump to transport adenosine against its concentration gradient 60. ENTs, more abundant on the cell membrane, mobilize adenosine to the extracellular space through facilitated diffusion (ENT1 and ENT2) or cation dependent transport (ENT3 and ENT4) 61 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Overview of Adenosine Metabolism.
There is a drastic elevation of extracellular adenosine 5′ –triphosphate (ATP) post-insult to the membrane or pathology involving inflammation, hypoxia or ischemia. Adenosine is generated extracellularly through metabolism of ATP to adenosine 5′ –diphosphate (ADP) to adenosine 5′ –monophosphate (AMP) which is mediated by membrane bound enzymes: ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase (E-NTPDase), ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (E-NPP), ecto-5′-nucleotidase (Ecto 5′-NT), adenosine deaminase (ADA), and purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP). Concentration based transporters (CNTs) and equilibrium dependent transporters (ENTs) contribute to extracellular adenosine levels. Counteracting kinases can be phosphorylated by ATP, including ecto-adenlyate kinase (AK), and nucleoside disphosphate (NDP) kinase. ATP is directly hydrolyzed to AMP by E-NPPs. Adenosine can be rescued by adenosine kinase to form AMP; AMP can be converted to ADP mediated by AK, and ADP conversion to ATP through ecto-NDP kinase.
Adenosine Receptors: Classification and Distribution
Adenosine mediates its effects through the binding of four different G-protein coupled adenosine receptors, classified by their downstream activation or inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) 62. These receptor subtypes differ in their binding affinity for adenosine, coupling to different G-proteins and distinct downstream signaling, pharmacological profile, and sequence. The A1 adenosine receptor (AR) can couple to inhibitory G-proteins, Go or Gi, leading to a consequent reduction of 3′-5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production or increased intracellular calcium levels determined by the effector pathway activated. A3AR can also couple to either inhibitor G-proteins Go or Gi with similar downstream effects. The A2 subtype ARs, A2A and A2B, can both couple to Gs, which results in downstream activation of AC and elevation of cAMP levels. A2BAR can additionally couple to Gq, with resulting alterations in intracellular calcium levels. The A2A, A1, and A3 ARs are classified by their high affinity for the adenosine ligand, where as the A2BAR is a low affinity receptor 62. A2BAR, A1AR, and CD39 are thought to associate with caveolae. This implicates close localization of adenosine generating enzymes to adenosine receptors on the surface of the cell, mediating rapid binding of newly generated adenosine to its receptors 63–65.
The tissue and cell distribution varies between the four subtypes of adenosine receptors. The A1AR is expressed significantly in the brain, heart, adipose tissue, stomach, vas deferens testis, spleen, kidney, aorta, eye, liver and bladder 66. The A3AR is highly expressed in the lung and liver, with lower expression in the testis, kidney, placenta, brain, heart, spleen, bladder, uterus, jejunum, proximal colon, aorta, and eyes 67. The A2-type receptors also differ in their tissue distribution. A2AAR is highly expressed in the striatum, nucleus accumbens, and olfactory tubercle 66; it has also been demonstrated to be expressed in platelets 68, 69, immune cells 70, 71, lung 66, heart 72 and the vasculature 66, 73. The A2BAR is predominantly expressed in the vasculature, retina and brain, with lower levels of expression in various cells and tissues, including platelets at baseline 66, 74. Numerous studies have demonstrated an upregulation of this receptor subtype with stress, including inflammation 75, hypoxia 54, and high fat diet 76. This review will focus on the A2-subtype ARs and their implication in vascular disease.
Effects on Inflammation
The A2BAR
Early studies demonstrated the role of the A2BAR in the regulation of monocyte and macrophage function in the context of inflammatory cytokines. IFN-γ has been shown to upregulate macrophage A2BAR expression, postulated to be linked to macrophage deactivation 77. The activation of the A2BAR inhibits the production and release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β from monocytes and macrophages 78–80, as well as stimulates the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such IL-10, from macrophages 81. Both effects thought to be modulated by downstream signaling of A2BAR’s activation of adenylyl cyclase and consequent increase in cAMP. A2BAR activation also inhibits macrophage proliferation post-inflammatory stimulus 77, 79, 80. A2BAR stimulation upregulates alternative macrophage activation, which can have a regulatory role in vascular disease 82. These observations have been further confirmed by in vivo and in vitro studies in the A2BAR knockout (KO) mouse, at baseline and under vascular stress.
The generation and characterization of the A2BAR KO mouse provided in vivo evidence for a role of this receptor subtype in mediating anti-inflammatory events. The A2BAR KO mouse at baseline is modestly inflamed with elevated plasma TNF-α and IL-6; challenge with endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), results in a consequent exaggerated production of TNF-α and IL-6. At baseline there is also an increased expression of vascular adhesion molecules thought to be mediated by the elevated levels of TNF-α and downregulation of IκB-α 74. Transplantation experiments confirmed the role of A2BAR expression in bone marrow cells in the observed phenotype 74. Interestingly, another study described a role for A2BARs in controlling TNF-α level in macrophages, independent of receptor activation 83, suggesting other regulatory mechanisms, including potential control by, yet to be identified, binding proteins. Similarly, elevated TNF-α in A2BAR KO mice at base line 74 (with no receptor activation) could be co-led by such a regulatory pathway. Consistent results were demonstrated in another A2BAR KO mouse model where enhanced mast cell activation and increased sensitivity to IgE-mediated prophylaxis was found in the absence of this receptor, suggestive that the A2BAR is a necessary component of mast cell antigen induced proinflammatory cytokine production 84. Interestingly, however, there have been contradicting reports on the role of the A2BAR in controlling inflammation under conditions of acute bacterial pathogenesis, or following polymicrobial sepsis. In the former case, A2BAR deletion was protective 85, while in the latter case, A2BAR ablation led to excessive inflammation and increased mortality 86. Of note, different A2BAR KO mice were used in these studies (85, 86). In another study, Dextran sodium sulfate, 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid, and Salmonella typhimurium were used to induce colitis in control and A2BAR KO mice. Colonic inflammation induced by these agents was attenuated in the KO mice compared with their wild-type counterparts 87. Thus, these studies highlight the importance of evaluating the duration, type of insult, and tissue involved in determining the final outcome of A2BAR activation or deletion under pathology. Indeed, in a recent report, emphasis was placed on the distinct roles the A2BAR plays in acute and chronic inflammation, using as model the different stages of bleomycin-induced lung injury 88.
The A2AAR
In vitro studies, involving activation of macrophage A2AAR indicated a role for this receptor in regulating the production of inflammatory cytokines 89–95. Via studies with A2AAR KO mice, it was concluded that the A2AAR is protective against inflammation induced by LPS, i.e., the level of inflammatory cytokines was elevated in the KO mice 96. Bone marrow transplantation experiments did not demonstrate that expression of A2AAR in bone marrow cells mediated the observed phenotype. On the other hand, CD73 KO cells treated with A2AAR agonist ATL-460e, led to a reversal of the upregulated VCAM-1 mRNA and protein expression and inhibited the arrest of monocytes. Continuous infusion of ATL-1460e in CD73 KO mice prevented neointima formation 97. Thus, this study presented evidence for the role of CD73 in endothelial cell activation and monocyte recruitment through generation of adenosine and subsequent activation of the A2AAR, providing further support for therapeutic use of this receptor subtype to modulate vascular inflammation.
Effects on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Restenosis
CD73/ecto-5′-nucleotidase, a significant generator of adenosine, is an important modulator of vasoprotection 98, 99. CD73 KO mice have enhanced vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) in carotid arteries; in vitro and in vivo perfused carotid arteries lacking CD73 demonstrated increased monocyte arrest mediated by α4β1. Wild type mice post-wire induced carotid injury had upregulation of CD73 expression; whereas CD73 KO mice post carotid injury had increased neointimal plaque formation and macrophage content, elevated NF-KB activation, luminal expression of VCAM-1 and levels of soluble VCAM-1. This clearly suggested that CD73-dependeent release of adenosine mediates such effects on neointimal hyperplasia. Here, the role of A2-type receptors is reviewed in this context.
The A2BAR
Vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation is an important component of vascular remodeling. Early studies identified adenosine as a candidate for a regulator of smooth muscle cell proliferation with suggested signaling through A2BAR 100. This was further confirmed by pharmacological approaches to demonstrate that activation of the A2BAR led to inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation 101, 102. Later in vitro studies demonstrated that A2BAR inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation mediated by B-Myb regulation of the A2BAR 103. Arterial smooth muscle cell apoptosis is found in similar vascular diseases including arterial restenosis and atherosclerosis 104–108. Adenosine has been shown to dose-dependently trigger apoptosis of arterial smooth muscle cells through cAMP signaling, and is inhibited by A2BAR antagonism; in advanced atherosclerosis the high rate of vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis could potentially contribute to plaque instability and consequent rupture 109. These studies support the therapeutic potential of this receptor in the prevention of vascular remodeling associated with various diseases, such as restenosis post-angioplasty, atherosclerosis and hypertension.
As to vascular restenosis, femoral artery injury in A2BAR KO mice was used to determine the role of the A2BAR in bone marrow derived macrophages and vascular smooth muscle cells in the context of vascular lesion formation. Consistent with earlier studies demonstrating a protective role of the A2BAR in modulating inflammation, bone-marrow-A2BAR was important for prevention of vascular lesion formation following injury. The authors demonstrated an upregulation of A2BAR in WT mice post wire-induced injury and that the level of TNF-α was regulated by A2BAR activity 110. In the absence of the A2BAR there were higher levels of TNF-α with correlated upregulation of CRCX4, a chemoattractant for progenitors during tissue regeneration, and greater proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, again demonstrated to be dependent on A2BAR expression in bone marrow cells 110.
The A2AAR
Early studies demonstrated a role for the A2AAR in the inflammatory response and endothelial activation following a vascular insult. Through the use of a carotid ligation model and the A2A AR selective agonist ATL-146e, it was demonstrated that A2AAR activation reduced early inflammatory processes that are pertinent to neointimal growth following vascular injury 111. The role of A2AAR signaling in leukocytes and their contribution to arterial neointimal formation was further investigated using a guide wire injury murine model 36. A2AAR, ApoE double knockout mice post arterial injury had larger neointima formation, consistent with the increased arterial neointima formation in chimeric mice that received A2AAR deficient bone marrow derived cells. These double knockout mice also demonstrated enhanced neutrophil rolling and adherence to injured arterial wall, correlated to the noted elevation in phosphorylation of MAPK, P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) clustering and β-2 integrin affinity. Thus, the study demonstrated that in the absence of the A2AAR, there is an enhancement of leukocyte homing ability and of arterial neointima formation following injury 36. The pathological neointimal hyperplasia and the correlation of number of leukocytes in the neointima to the severity of restenosis are supportive of the therapeutic application of A2AAR antagonists on arterial restenosis following arterial angioplasty.
Influences on Atherosclerosis
The A2BAR
Foam cell formation, a process that is mediated by low density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation by macrophages, is a significant factor that contributes to the development of atherosclerosis 112. Hypoxia and HIF-1 have significant roles in atherogenesis 113–115, and promotion of intraplaque angiogenesis and foam cell formation 115, 116, respectively. Adenosine under conditions of hypoxia stimulates the accumulation of HIF-1α mediated by signaling through all adenosine receptor subtypes 117. Gessi et al., demonstrated through specific pharmacological ligands that adenosine-mediated stimulation of foam cell formation was inhibited by antagonism of A3AR and A2BAR, suggestive of a potential role for these receptors in the prevention of adenosine-mediated atherosclerotic plaque pathogenesis 33. Of note, however, A3AR KO mice on an Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) null background, fed high fat diet develop atherosclerosis to a similar degree as matching controls 118. A recent study by Koupenova et al., 34 demonstrated a significant role for the A2BAR in modulating atherosclerosis. Using a mouse model of atherosclerosis (ApoE deficient background) and a high fat, high cholesterol diet (HFD), the authors demonstrated that in the absence of the A2BAR there was a worse atherosclerotic profile. This aggravated phenotype in the A2BAR KO mice was not dependent on bone marrow derived signals. Interestingly, with HFD, hepatic expression of A2BAR was significantly upregulated, along with plasma and hepatic levels of triglycerides and cholesterol and confirmed by pathology consistent with hepatic steatosis. Mechanistically, this was shown to be mediated by low levels of cAMP and consequent elevated expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) and downstream targets that are regulators of lipogenesis. This was further confirmed by in vitro pharmacological treatments of primary hepatocytes with specific ligands for the A2BAR. Changes in cAMP mediated by A2BAR activation were found to regulate the transcriptionally active form of SREBP-1. The phenotype was ameliorated by adenoviral restoration of the hepatic A2BAR in the knockout as well as through pharmacological activation of the A2BAR by BAY 60-6583 34. This in vivo data suggests the therapeutic potential of this receptor to modulate the pathogenesis of atherogenesis.
The A2AAR
The A2AAR has been demonstrated to have pro- as well as anti-atherosclerotic properties. Studies based on a murine knockout model of the A2AAR on an ApoE null background concluded that the A2AAR is pro- atherosclerotic. These double knockout mice displayed elevated cholesterol, proinflammatory cytokines, and increased inflammation status of atherosclerotic lesions; yet the lesions were smaller relative to control mice. Bone marrow transplantation experiments yielded similar results. Chimeric ApoE deficient mice transplanted with A2AAR deficient bone marrow cells also had smaller atherosclerotic lesions. Macrophages from A2AAR deficient mice and foam cells formed in vivo exhibited increased apoptosis, demonstrated to be a result of elevated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity 35. This study suggested that perhaps inactivation of the A2AAR could be useful for the treatment of atherosclerosis.
Additional studies have focused on the role of the A2AAR in other aspects of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Foam cell formation, a hallmark of atherosclerosis, is mediated by alterations in the transport of cholesterol out of macrophages; two important proteins that control cholesterol content are cholesterol 27-hydroxylase and adenosine 5′-triphosphate-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1). Cholesterol 27-hydroxylase has been shown to be downregulated by immune complexes and pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to inhibition of macrophages efflux of cholesterol and consequent foam cell formation 119, 120. Application of an A2AAR agonist CGS-21680 inhibited this foam cell formation in THP-1 human macrophages and in cultured peritoneal macrophages. Activation of the A2AAR led to an unpregulation of cholesterol 27-hydroxylase and ABCA-1, indicating, in this case, anti-atherosclerotic effects of A2AAR 121.
Effects on Thrombosis
The A2BAR
As noted previously, hemostasis and thrombosis play an important role in the pathogenesis of vascular disease. Platelets from A2BAR KO mice exhibit a higher platelet aggregation response post-ADP and collagen stimulation, manifested particularly in platelets derived from mice following vascular injury. Under such conditions, the A2BAR is upegulated in the platelets and in the platelet precursors, the megakaryocytes, allowing inhibitory effects on the aggregation of platelets38. Given the induction of A2BAR expression following stress, including injury, elevated reactive oxygen species or TNF-alpha 75, 110, the elucidation of this receptor’s inhibitory role on platelet aggregation highlights its therapeutic relevance for use in regulating thrombosis.
The A2AAR
As mentioned above, platelet activation and aggregation is an important component of both early atherosclerotic plaque formation as well as atherosclerotic plaque rupture and consequent coronary events. Early studies identified the A2AAR to be expressed on murine platelets 122–124 as well as human platelets 125 and to be the receptor through which adenosine mediated its inhibitory effects on platelet aggregation. This is achieved through inhibition of both the mobilization of internal stores of calcium and the influx of external calcium, both connected to activation of adenylyl cyclase 126. A2AAR deficient mice demonstrate increased platelet aggregation; non-selective adenosine receptor agonist, 5′-N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine (NECA), inhibited platelet aggregation in wild type mice but had no effect in A2AAR null mice, indicating that A2AAR is a key mediator of the antiaggregatory effects of adenosine on platelets 69. Consistent with this observation, other groups have demonstrated in human platelets that the A2AAR mediates a NECA-stimulated elevation in cAMP levels, a key component of platelet activation 125, 127, 128. The use of a specific A2AAR agonist, 4-[2-[[6-Amino-9(N-ethyl-β-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl]benzenepropanoic acid hydrochloride (CGS 21680), demonstrated a species dependent platelet responsiveness to A2AAR agonism 129. Reactivity as well as aggregation of canine platelets was not inhibited by A2AAR agonism; whereas in a human recurrent thrombosis model, agonism of the A2AAR significantly inhibited platelet activation. In addition, in vitro, collagen induced platelet aggregation was inhibited post-treatment with the A2AAR agonist CGS 21680, as well as an inhibition of the increase of platelet surface expression of P-selectin and inhibition of platelet-monocyte aggregation post-stimulation with ADP and thromboxane agonist (U46619) 129. This data supports the application of A2AAR agonists for clinical use when inhibition of platelet function is necessary.
Other Cardiovascular Effects
The A2BAR
Upregulation of A2BAR expression and functional activity is seen during hypoxic and ischemic conditions 130–132, i.e. hypoxic human umbilical vein endothelial cells have increased A2BAR mRNA expression 133. Similar upregulation is found in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1) and T84 intestinal epithelial cells post-hypoxia 134. The A2BAR gene promoter contains a functional hypoxia inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) binding site, a key transcriptional regulator necessary for adaptive response post-hypoxia; disruption of this regulatory site results in the lack of A2BAR upregulation post-hypoxic conditions 134. The A2BAR KO mice post-hypoxia demonstrate increased vascular leakage as well as increased neutrophil influx into tissues. Bone marrow transplantation experiments showed this to be partially mediated by A2BAR expression in bone marrow cells 135. Pharmacological targeting of either A2AAR or A2BAR at reperfusion post-ischemic event provides cardioprotection evidenced by a reduced infarct size 54, 136. These studies suggest the importance of A2AR in mediating an adaptive response post-ischemic insult. Adenosine is also a stimulator of angiogenesis 137, 138. Activation of A2BAR on endothelial cells or mast cells, induces the release of angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 139, 140. Thus, the pro-angiogenic result of A2BAR activation suggests its clinical potential for regenerative processes, given the important role of angiogenesis in tissue repair.
The A2AAR
Cardioprotection during a myocardial infarction or during reperfusion of the heart is achieved if treatments are applied prior to the onset of ischemia. Activation of the A2AAR at reperfusion reduced the infarct size in canine and rabbits 141; similar studies have demonstrated a therapeutic effect achieved by selectively activating the A2BAR 142–144, indicating that activation of the A2-subtype adenosine receptors mediates a protective post-conditioning of the re-perfused heart. A2AAR agonism has been postulated to provide protection through the ability of this receptor to increase coronary blood flow post-cardiac ischemia, thought to be mediated by activation of Kv and KATP channels 145. A recent study demonstrated that for optimal adenosine-mediated cardioprotection there needs to be activation of multiple adenosine receptor subtypes; through the use of pharmacological ligands and knock out murine models, the authors demonstrated that for A1AR-mediated cardioprotection, A2AAR and A2BAR are required 146. Adenosine has an inhibitory effect on the release of thrombospondin 1, an anti-angiogenic protein, with a consequent increase in vascular tube formation, suggested to be mediated by A2AAR agonism 147. Angiogenesis is an important component of tissue repair, thus activation of the A2AAR is of interest for regenerative related clinical scenarios.
Conclusion
A2-subtype adenosine receptors mediate various biological processes that are pertinent to the pathogenesis of vascular disease; it is evident that they are key components of maintaining the balance of inflammatory responses following a stress or injury, as well as significant mediators of lipid metabolism and transport in different tissues and cell types. However, although both the A2BAR and A2AAR signal via cAMP, they also clearly differ in some physiological effects, such as the atherosclerotic response to high fat diet. This could be attributed to additional distinct signaling mediated by one of the receptors (e.g., Gq activation by the A2BAR), and/or owing to other regulatory proteins binding and affecting one or both receptors. Further studies that elucidate mechanism will be a key in the design of novel therapeutic applications geared toward cell and tissue specificity.
Acknowledgments
We hope for the understanding of all authors whose important work in the field could not be cited because of word count limitations.
Sources of Funding: This work was supported by NHLBI grant HL93149 to KR. KR is an Established Investigator with the AHA. HJC was supported by Cardiovascular Training Grant from the National Institutes of Health (HL007969). MK was supported by the postdoctoral Cardiovascular Training Grant from the National Institutes of Health (HL007224).
Footnotes
Disclosures: none
References
- 1.Weber C, Noels H. Atherosclerosis: Current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nature medicine. 2011;17:1410–1422. doi: 10.1038/nm.2538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moore KJ, Tabas I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011;145:341–355. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hansson GK, Hermansson A. The immune system in atherosclerosis. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:204–212. doi: 10.1038/ni.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orford JL, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Popma JJ, Rogers C. The comparative pathobiology of atherosclerosis and restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:6H–11H. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01094-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Komatsu R, Ueda M, Naruko T, Kojima A, Becker AE. Neointimal tissue response at sites of coronary stenting in humans: Macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses. Circulation. 1998;98:224–233. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.3.224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Austin GE, Ratliff NB, Hollman J, Tabei S, Phillips DF. Intimal proliferation of smooth muscle cells as an explanation for recurrent coronary artery stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1985;6:369–375. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80174-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Uchida Y, Hasegawa K, Kawamura K, Shibuya I. Angioscopic observation of the coronary luminal changes induced by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. American heart journal. 1989;117:769–776. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90611-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Block PC. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty--anatomic and pathophysiological mechanisms. Strategies for prevention. Circulation. 1990;81:IV2–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Farb A, Sangiorgi G, Carter AJ, Walley VM, Edwards WD, Schwartz RS, Virmani R. Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. Circulation. 1999;99:44–52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.1.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Neumann FJ, Ott I, Gawaz M, Puchner G, Schomig A. Neutrophil and platelet activation at balloon-injured coronary artery plaque in patients undergoing angioplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1996;27:819–824. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00563-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rogers C, Welt FG, Karnovsky MJ, Edelman ER. Monocyte recruitment and neointimal hyperplasia in rabbits. Coupled inhibitory effects of heparin. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 1996;16:1312–1318. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.16.10.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: A perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801–809. doi: 10.1038/362801a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Forrester JS, Fishbein M, Helfant R, Fagin J. A paradigm for restenosis based on cell biology: Clues for the development of new preventive therapies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1991;17:758–769. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80196-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bar-Shavit R, Kahn A, Wilner GD, Fenton JW., 2nd Monocyte chemotaxis: Stimulation by specific exosite region in thrombin. Science. 1983;220:728–731. doi: 10.1126/science.6836310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McNamara CA, Sarembock IJ, Gimple LW, Fenton JW, 2nd, Coughlin SR, Owens GK. Thrombin stimulates proliferation of cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells by a proteolytically activated receptor. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1993;91:94–98. doi: 10.1172/JCI116206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bar-Shavit R, Benezra M, Eldor A, Hy-Am E, Fenton JW, 2nd, Wilner GD, Vlodavsky I. Thrombin immobilized to extracellular matrix is a potent mitogen for vascular smooth muscle cells: Nonenzymatic mode of action. Cell Regul. 1990;1:453–463. doi: 10.1091/mbc.1.6.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Indolfi C, Avvedimento EV, Di Lorenzo E, Esposito G, Rapacciuolo A, Giuliano P, Grieco D, Cavuto L, Stingone AM, Ciullo I, Condorelli G, Chiariello M. Activation of camp-pka signaling in vivo inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation induced by vascular injury. Nature medicine. 1997;3:775–779. doi: 10.1038/nm0797-775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (2) N Engl J Med. 1992;326:310–318. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199201303260506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huo Y, Schober A, Forlow SB, Smith DF, Hyman MC, Jung S, Littman DR, Weber C, Ley K. Circulating activated platelets exacerbate atherosclerosis in mice deficient in apolipoprotein e. Nat Med. 2003;9:61–67. doi: 10.1038/nm810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gawaz M, Langer H, May AE. Platelets in inflammation and atherogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3378–3384. doi: 10.1172/JCI27196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gachet C. P2 receptors, platelet function and pharmacological implications. Thromb Haemost. 2008;99:466–472. doi: 10.1160/TH07-11-0673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jennings LK. Mechanisms of platelet activation: Need for new strategies to protect against platelet-mediated atherothrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102:248–257. doi: 10.1160/TH09-03-0192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Feletou M, Vanhoutte PM, Verbeuren TJ. The thromboxane/endoperoxide receptor (tp): The common villain. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2010;55:317–332. doi: 10.1097/fjc.0b013e3181d8bc8a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Macaulay TE, Allen C, Ziada KM. Thrombin receptor antagonism -the potential of antiplatelet medication sch 530348. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11:1015–1022. doi: 10.1517/14656561003720471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li Z, Delaney MK, O’Brien KA, Du X. Signaling during platelet adhesion and activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:2341–2349. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smyth SS, Woulfe DS, Weitz JI, Gachet C, Conley PB, Goodman SG, Roe MT, Kuliopulos A, Moliterno DJ, French PA, Steinhubl SR, Becker RC. G-protein-coupled receptors as signaling targets for antiplatelet therapy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:449–457. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.176388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Offermanns S. Activation of platelet function through g protein-coupled receptors. Circ Res. 2006;99:1293–1304. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000251742.71301.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hantgan RR, Stahle MC, Lord ST. Dynamic regulation of fibrinogen: Integrin alphaiibbeta3 binding. Biochemistry. 2010;49:9217–9225. doi: 10.1021/bi1009858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Weisel JW. Fibrinogen and fibrin. Adv Protein Chem. 2005;70:247–299. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3233(05)70008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mosesson MW. Fibrinogen and fibrin structure and functions. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1894–1904. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mangin P, Yuan Y, Goncalves I, Eckly A, Freund M, Cazenave JP, Gachet C, Jackson SP, Lanza F. Signaling role for phospholipase c gamma 2 in platelet glycoprotein ib alpha calcium flux and cytoskeletal reorganization. Involvement of a pathway distinct from fcr gamma chain and fc gamma riia. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:32880–32891. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302333200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Christodoulides N, Feng S, Resendiz JC, Berndt MC, Kroll MH. Glycoprotein ib/ix/v binding to the membrane skeleton maintains shear-induced platelet aggregation. Thromb Res. 2001;102:133–142. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(01)00243-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gessi S, Fogli E, Sacchetto V, Merighi S, Varani K, Preti D, Leung E, Maclennan S, Borea PA. Adenosine modulates hif-1{alpha}, vegf, il-8, and foam cell formation in a human model of hypoxic foam cells. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2010;30:90–97. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.194902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Koupenova M, Johnston-Cox H, Vezeridis A, Gavras H, Yang D, Zannis V, Ravid K. The a2b adenosine receptor regulates hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2011 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.057596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang H, Zhang W, Zhu C, Bucher C, Blazar BR, Zhang C, Chen JF, Linden J, Wu C, Huo Y. Inactivation of the adenosine a2a receptor protects apolipoprotein e-deficient mice from atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2009;29:1046–1052. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.188839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang H, Zhang W, Tang R, Zhu C, Bucher C, Blazar BR, Geng JG, Zhang C, Linden J, Wu C, Huo Y. Adenosine receptor a2a deficiency in leukocytes increases arterial neointima formation in apolipoprotein e-deficient mice. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2010;30:915–922. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.202572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yang D, Koupenova M, McCrann DJ, Kopeikina KJ, Kagan HM, Schreiber BM, Ravid K. The a2b adenosine receptor protects against vascular injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:792–796. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705563105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang D, Chen H, Koupenova M, Carroll SH, Eliades A, Freedman JE, Toselli P, Ravid K. A new role for the a2b adenosine receptor in regulating platelet function. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:817–827. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03769.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Amisten S, Braun OO, Bengtsson A, Erlinge D. Gene expression profiling for the identification of g-protein coupled receptors in human platelets. Thromb Res. 2008;122:47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bodin P, Burnstock G. Increased release of atp from endothelial cells during acute inflammation. Inflamm Res. 1998;47:351–354. doi: 10.1007/s000110050341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bodin P, Burnstock G. Purinergic signalling: Atp release. Neurochem Res. 2001;26:959–969. doi: 10.1023/a:1012388618693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Latini S, Pedata F. Adenosine in the central nervous system: Release mechanisms and extracellular concentrations. J Neurochem. 2001;79:463–484. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lazarowski ER, Boucher RC, Harden TK. Mechanisms of release of nucleotides and integration of their action as p2x- and p2y-receptor activating molecules. Molecular pharmacology. 2003;64:785–795. doi: 10.1124/mol.64.4.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Linden J. Adenosine in tissue protection and tissue regeneration. Molecular pharmacology. 2005;67:1385–1387. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.011783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fredholm BB. Adenosine, an endogenous distress signal, modulates tissue damage and repair. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1315–1323. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bours MJ, Swennen EL, Di Virgilio F, Cronstein BN, Dagnelie PC. Adenosine 5′-triphosphate and adenosine as endogenous signaling molecules in immunity and inflammation. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;112:358–404. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rump LC, Bohmann C, Schwertfeger E, Krumme B, von Kugelgen I, Schollmeyer P. Extracellular atp in the human kidney: Mode of release and vascular effects. Journal of autonomic pharmacology. 1996;16:371–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-8673.1996.tb00056.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sauer H, Hescheler J, Wartenberg M. Mechanical strain-induced ca(2+) waves are propagated via atp release and purinergic receptor activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;279:C295–307. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.2.C295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Van der Wijk T, De Jonge HR, Tilly BC. Osmotic cell swelling-induced atp release mediates the activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (erk)-1/2 but not the activation of osmo-sensitive anion channels. Biochem J. 1999;343(Pt 3):579–586. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3430579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yegutkin GG. Nucleotide- and nucleoside-converting ectoenzymes: Important modulators of purinergic signalling cascade. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783:673–694. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Goding JW, Grobben B, Slegers H. Physiological and pathophysiological functions of the ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1638:1–19. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(03)00058-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kaczmarek E, Koziak K, Sevigny J, Siegel JB, Anrather J, Beaudoin AR, Bach FH, Robson SC. Identification and characterization of cd39/vascular atp diphosphohydrolase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1996;271:33116–33122. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.51.33116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang TF, Guidotti G. Cd39 is an ecto-(ca2+,mg2+)-apyrase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1996;271:9898–9901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Eckle T, Krahn T, Grenz A, Kohler D, Mittelbronn M, Ledent C, Jacobson MA, Osswald H, Thompson LF, Unertl K, Eltzschig HK. Cardioprotection by ecto-5′-nucleotidase (cd73) and a2b adenosine receptors. Circulation. 2007;115:1581–1590. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.669697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fahey RC, Newton GL, Arrick B, Overdank-Bogart T, Aley SB. Entamoeba histolytica: A eukaryote without glutathione metabolism. Science. 1984;224:70–72. doi: 10.1126/science.6322306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kowaluk EA, Bhagwat SS, Jarvis MF. Adenosine kinase inhibitors. Curr Pharm Des. 1998;4:403–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kowaluk EA, Jarvis MF. Therapeutic potential of adenosine kinase inhibitors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2000;9:551–564. doi: 10.1517/13543784.9.3.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.McGaraughty S, Cowart M, Jarvis MF. Recent developments in the discovery of novel adenosine kinase inhibitors: Mechanism of action and therapeutic potential. CNS Drug Rev. 2001;7:415–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00208.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Decking UK, Schlieper G, Kroll K, Schrader J. Hypoxia-induced inhibition of adenosine kinase potentiates cardiac adenosine release. Circulation research. 1997;81:154–164. doi: 10.1161/01.res.81.2.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baldwin SA, Beal PR, Yao SY, King AE, Cass CE, Young JD. The equilibrative nucleoside transporter family, slc29. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:735–743. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1103-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gray JH, Owen RP, Giacomini KM. The concentrative nucleoside transporter family, slc28. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:728–734. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1107-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fredholm BB, AP IJ, Jacobson KA, Klotz KN, Linden J International union of pharmacology. Xxv. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53:527–552. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kittel A, Kiss AL, Mullner N, Matko I, Sperlagh B. Expression of ntpdase1 and caveolins in human cardiovascular disease. Histochem Cell Biol. 2005;124:51–59. doi: 10.1007/s00418-005-0018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lasley RD, Smart EJ. Cardiac myocyte adenosine receptors and caveolae. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2001;11:259–263. doi: 10.1016/s1050-1738(01)00120-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sitaraman SV, Wang L, Wong M, Bruewer M, Hobert M, Yun CH, Merlin D, Madara JL. The adenosine 2b receptor is recruited to the plasma membrane and associates with e3karp and ezrin upon agonist stimulation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277:33188–33195. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202522200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dixon AK, Gubitz AK, Sirinathsinghji DJ, Richardson PJ, Freeman TC. Tissue distribution of adenosine receptor mrnas in the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;118:1461–1468. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15561.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gessi S, Merighi S, Varani K, Leung E, Mac Lennan S, Borea PA. The a3 adenosine receptor: An enigmatic player in cell biology. Pharmacol Ther. 2008;117:123–140. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Salama SE, Haslam RJ. Subcellular distribution of cyclic amp-dependent protein kinase activity and of cyclic amp-binding proteins in human platelets. Modification by ca2+-dependent proteolysis. FEBS Lett. 1981;130:230–234. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(81)81127-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ledent C, Vaugeois JM, Schiffmann SN, Pedrazzini T, El Yacoubi M, Vanderhaeghen JJ, Costentin J, Heath JK, Vassart G, Parmentier M. Aggressiveness, hypoalgesia and high blood pressure in mice lacking the adenosine a2a receptor. Nature. 1997;388:674–678. doi: 10.1038/41771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Huang S, Apasov S, Koshiba M, Sitkovsky M. Role of a2a extracellular adenosine receptor-mediated signaling in adenosine-mediated inhibition of t-cell activation and expansion. Blood. 1997;90:1600–1610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cronstein BN, Daguma L, Nichols D, Hutchison AJ, Williams M. The adenosine/neutrophil paradox resolved: Human neutrophils possess both a1 and a2 receptors that promote chemotaxis and inhibit o2 generation, respectively. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1990;85:1150–1157. doi: 10.1172/JCI114547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Martin PL, Ueeda M, Olsson RA. 2-phenylethoxy-9-methyladenine: An adenosine receptor antagonist that discriminates between a2 adenosine receptors in the aorta and the coronary vessels from the guinea pig. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1993;265:248–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Conti A, Monopoli A, Gamba M, Borea PA, Ongini E. Effects of selective a1 and a2 adenosine receptor agonists on cardiovascular tissues. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1993;348:108–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00168545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yang D, Zhang Y, Nguyen HG, Koupenova M, Chauhan AK, Makitalo M, Jones MR, St Hilaire C, Seldin DC, Toselli P, Lamperti E, Schreiber BM, Gavras H, Wagner DD, Ravid K. The a2b adenosine receptor protects against inflammation and excessive vascular adhesion. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2006;116:1913–1923. doi: 10.1172/JCI27933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.St Hilaire C, Koupenova M, Carroll SH, Smith BD, Ravid K. Tnf-alpha upregulates the a2b adenosine receptor gene: The role of nad(p)h oxidase 4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;375:292–296. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Koupenova M, Johnston-Cox H, Vezeridis A, Gavras H, Yang D, Zannis V, Ravid K. The a2b adenosine receptor regulates hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2011;125:354–363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.057596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Xaus J, Mirabet M, Lloberas J, Soler C, Lluis C, Franco R, Celada A. Ifn-gamma up-regulates the a2b adenosine receptor expression in macrophages: A mechanism of macrophage deactivation. J Immunol. 1999;162:3607–3614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Xaus J, Valledor AF, Cardo M, Marques L, Beleta J, Palacios JM, Celada A. Adenosine inhibits macrophage colony-stimulating factor-dependent proliferation of macrophages through the induction of p27kip-1 expression. J Immunol. 1999;163:4140–4149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sipka S, Kovacs I, Szanto S, Szegedi G, Brugos L, Bruckner G, Jozsef Szentmiklosi A. Adenosine inhibits the release of interleukin-1beta in activated human peripheral mononuclear cells. Cytokine. 2005;31:258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kreckler LM, Wan TC, Ge ZD, Auchampach JA. Adenosine inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha release from mouse peritoneal macrophages via a2a and a2b but not the a3 adenosine receptor. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2006;317:172–180. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.096016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Nemeth ZH, Lutz CS, Csoka B, Deitch EA, Leibovich SJ, Gause WC, Tone M, Pacher P, Vizi ES, Hasko G. Adenosine augments il-10 production by macrophages through an a2b receptor-mediated posttranscriptional mechanism. J Immunol. 2005;175:8260–8270. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Csoka B, Selmeczy Z, Koscso B, Nemeth ZH, Pacher P, Murray PJ, Kepka-Lenhart D, Morris SM, Jr, Gause WC, Leibovich SJ, Hasko G. Adenosine promotes alternative macrophage activation via a2a and a2b receptors. Faseb J. 2012;26:376–386. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-190934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ryzhov S, Zaynagetdinov R, Goldstein AE, Novitskiy SV, Blackburn MR, Biaggioni I, Feoktistov I. Effect of a2b adenosine receptor gene ablation on adenosine-dependent regulation of proinflammatory cytokines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;324:694–700. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.131540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hua X, Kovarova M, Chason KD, Nguyen M, Koller BH, Tilley SL. Enhanced mast cell activation in mice deficient in the a2b adenosine receptor. J Exp Med. 2007;204:117–128. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Belikoff BG, Hatfield S, Georgiev P, Ohta A, Lukashev D, Buras JA, Remick DG, Sitkovsky M. A2b adenosine receptor blockade enhances macrophage-mediated bacterial phagocytosis and improves polymicrobial sepsis survival in mice. J Immunol. 2011;186:2444–2453. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Csoka B, Nemeth ZH, Rosenberger P, Eltzschig HK, Spolarics Z, Pacher P, Selmeczy Z, Koscso B, Himer L, Vizi ES, Blackburn MR, Deitch EA, Hasko G. A2b adenosine receptors protect against sepsis-induced mortality by dampening excessive inflammation. J Immunol. 2010;185:542–550. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kolachala VL, Vijay-Kumar M, Dalmasso G, Yang D, Linden J, Wang L, Gewirtz A, Ravid K, Merlin D, Sitaraman SV. A2b adenosine receptor gene deletion attenuates murine colitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:861–870. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhou Y, Schneider DJ, Morschl E, Song L, Pedroza M, Karmouty-Quintana H, Le T, Sun CX, Blackburn MR. Distinct roles for the a2b adenosine receptor in acute and chronic stages of bleomycin-induced lung injury. J Immunol. 2011;186:1097–1106. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Salmon JE, Brogle N, Brownlie C, Edberg JC, Kimberly RP, Chen BX, Erlanger BF. Human mononuclear phagocytes express adenosine a1 receptors. A novel mechanism for differential regulation of fc gamma receptor function. J Immunol. 1993;151:2775–2785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Eppell BA, Newell AM, Brown EJ. Adenosine receptors are expressed during differentiation of monocytes to macrophages in vitro. Implications for regulation of phagocytosis. J Immunol. 1989;143:4141–4145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Le Vraux V, Chen YL, Masson I, De Sousa M, Giroud JP, Florentin I, Chauvelot-Moachon L. Inhibition of human monocyte tnf production by adenosine receptor agonists. Life Sci. 1993;52:1917–1924. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90632-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Zhang JG, Hepburn L, Cruz G, Borman RA, Clark KL. The role of adenosine a2a and a2b receptors in the regulation of tnf-alpha production by human monocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005;69:883–889. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ezeamuzie CI, Khan I. The role of adenosine a(2) receptors in the regulation of tnf-alpha production and pge(2) release in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Int Immunopharmacol. 2007;7:483–490. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2006.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kreckler LM, Wan TC, Ge ZD, Auchampach JA. Adenosine inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha release from mouse peritoneal macrophages via a2a and a2b but not the a3 adenosine receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;317:172–180. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.096016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hasko G, Kuhel DG, Chen JF, Schwarzschild MA, Deitch EA, Mabley JG, Marton A, Szabo C. Adenosine inhibits il-12 and tnf-[alpha] production via adenosine a2a receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms. Faseb J. 2000;14:2065–2074. doi: 10.1096/fj.99-0508com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ohta A, Sitkovsky M. Role of g-protein-coupled adenosine receptors in downregulation of inflammation and protection from tissue damage. Nature. 2001;414:916–920. doi: 10.1038/414916a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Zernecke A, Bidzhekov K, Ozuyaman B, Fraemohs L, Liehn EA, Luscher-Firzlaff JM, Luscher B, Schrader J, Weber C. Cd73/ecto-5′-nucleotidase protects against vascular inflammation and neointima formation. Circulation. 2006;113:2120–2127. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Koszalka P, Ozuyaman B, Huo Y, Zernecke A, Flogel U, Braun N, Buchheiser A, Decking UK, Smith ML, Sevigny J, Gear A, Weber AA, Molojavyi A, Ding Z, Weber C, Ley K, Zimmermann H, Godecke A, Schrader J. Targeted disruption of cd73/ecto-5′-nucleotidase alters thromboregulation and augments vascular inflammatory response. Circulation research. 2004;95:814–821. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000144796.82787.6f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Thompson LF, Eltzschig HK, Ibla JC, Van De Wiele CJ, Resta R, Morote-Garcia JC, Colgan SP. Crucial role for ecto-5′-nucleotidase (cd73) in vascular leakage during hypoxia. J Exp Med. 2004;200:1395–1405. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Osaka K, Suzuki F, Jackson EK. Adenosine inhibits growth of rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Possible role of a2b receptor. Hypertension. 1996;27:786–793. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.27.3.786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Shue H, Jackson EK. A(2b) receptors mediate antimitogenesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 2000;35:267–272. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.35.1.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Mi Z, Jackson EK. Adenosine inhibits growth of human aortic smooth muscle cells via a2b receptors. Hypertension. 1998;31:516–521. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.31.1.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.St Hilaire C, Yang D, Schreiber BM, Ravid K. B-myb regulates the a(2b) adenosine receptor in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biochem. 2008;103:1962–1974. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Han DK, Haudenschild CC, Hong MK, Tinkle BT, Leon MB, Liau G. Evidence for apoptosis in human atherogenesis and in a rat vascular injury model. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:267–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Geng YJ, Libby P. Evidence for apoptosis in advanced human atheroma. Colocalization with interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:251–266. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Isner JM, Kearney M, Bortman S, Passeri J. Apoptosis in human atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circulation. 1995;91:2703–2711. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.11.2703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bjorkerud S, Bjorkerud B. Apoptosis is abundant in human atherosclerotic lesions, especially in inflammatory cells (macrophages and t cells), and may contribute to the accumulation of gruel and plaque instability. Am J Pathol. 1996;149:367–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Crisby M, Kallin B, Thyberg J, Zhivotovsky B, Orrenius S, Kostulas V, Nilsson J. Cell death in human atherosclerotic plaques involves both oncosis and apoptosis. Atherosclerosis. 1997;130:17–27. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(96)06037-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Peyot ML, Gadeau AP, Dandre F, Belloc I, Dupuch F, Desgranges C. Extracellular adenosine induces apoptosis of human arterial smooth muscle cells via a(2b)-purinoceptor. Circulation research. 2000;86:76–85. doi: 10.1161/01.res.86.1.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Yang D, Koupenova M, McCrann DJ, Kopeikina KJ, Kagan HM, Schreiber BM, Ravid K. The a2b adenosine receptor protects against vascular injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:792–796. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705563105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.McPherson JA, Barringhaus KG, Bishop GG, Sanders JM, Rieger JM, Hesselbacher SE, Gimple LW, Powers ER, Macdonald T, Sullivan G, Linden J, Sarembock IJ. Adenosine a(2a) receptor stimulation reduces inflammation and neointimal growth in a murine carotid ligation model. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2001;21:791–796. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.21.5.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Pennings M, Meurs I, Ye D, Out R, Hoekstra M, Van Berkel TJ, Van Eck M. Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in macrophages and consequences for atherosclerotic lesion development. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:5588–5596. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Bjornheden T, Levin M, Evaldsson M, Wiklund O. Evidence of hypoxic areas within the arterial wall in vivo. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 1999;19:870–876. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.19.4.870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Murdoch C, Muthana M, Lewis CE. Hypoxia regulates macrophage functions in inflammation. J Immunol. 2005;175:6257–6263. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Sluimer JC, Gasc JM, van Wanroij JL, Kisters N, Groeneweg M, Sollewijn Gelpke MD, Cleutjens JP, van den Akker LH, Corvol P, Wouters BG, Daemen MJ, Bijnens AP. Hypoxia, hypoxia-inducible transcription factor, and macrophages in human atherosclerotic plaques are correlated with intraplaque angiogenesis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;51:1258–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Jiang G, Li T, Qiu Y, Rui Y, Chen W, Lou Y. Rna interference for hif-1alpha inhibits foam cells formation in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;562:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.01.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Jacobson KA, Gao ZG. Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:247–264. doi: 10.1038/nrd1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Jones MR, Zhao Z, Sullivan CP, Schreiber BM, Stone PJ, Toselli PA, Kagan HM, Cohen RA, Ravid K. A(3) adenosine receptor deficiency does not influence atherogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 2004;92:1034–1043. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Palinski W, Witztum JL. Immune responses to oxidative neoepitopes on ldl and phospholipids modulate the development of atherosclerosis. J Intern Med. 2000;247:371–380. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Reiss AB, Awadallah NW, Malhotra S, Montesinos MC, Chan ES, Javitt NB, Cronstein BN. Immune complexes and ifn-gamma decrease cholesterol 27-hydroxylase in human arterial endothelium and macrophages. J Lipid Res. 2001;42:1913–1922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Reiss AB, Rahman MM, Chan ES, Montesinos MC, Awadallah NW, Cronstein BN. Adenosine a2a receptor occupancy stimulates expression of proteins involved in reverse cholesterol transport and inhibits foam cell formation in macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;76:727–734. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0204107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Coates J, Gurden MF, Harris C, Kennedy I, Sheehan MJ, Strong P. Adenosine receptor classification - quo vadimus. Nucleos Nucleot. 1994;13:1953–1976. [Google Scholar]
- 123.Collis MG, Hourani SMO. Adenosine receptor subtypes. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 1993;14:360–366. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(93)90094-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.van Galen PJ, Stiles GL, Michaels G, Jacobson KA. Adenosine a1 and a2 receptors: Structure--function relationships. Med Res Rev. 1992;12:423–471. doi: 10.1002/med.2610120502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Dionisotti S, Ferrara S, Molta C, Zocchi C, Ongini E. Labeling of a2a adenosine receptors in human platelets by use of the new nonxanthine antagonist radioligand [3h]sch 58261. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;278:1209–1214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Paul S, Feoktistov I, Hollister AS, Robertson D, Biaggioni I. Adenosine inhibits the rise in intracellular calcium and platelet aggregation produced by thrombin: Evidence that both effects are coupled to adenylate cyclase. Mol Pharmacol. 1990;37:870–875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Cooper JA, Hill SJ, Alexander SP, Rubin PC, Horn EH. Adenosine receptor-induced cyclic amp generation and inhibition of 5-hydroxytryptamine release in human platelets. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;40:43–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04533.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Varani K, Portaluppi F, Merighi S, Ongini E, Belardinelli L, Borea PA. Caffeine alters a2a adenosine receptors and their function in human platelets. Circulation. 1999;99:2499–2502. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.19.2499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Linden MD, Barnard MR, Frelinger AL, Michelson AD, Przyklenk K. Effect of adenosine a2 receptor stimulation on platelet activation-aggregation: Differences between canine and human models. Thromb Res. 2008;121:689–698. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2007.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Zhong H, Belardinelli L, Maa T, Zeng D. Synergy between a2b adenosine receptors and hypoxia in activating human lung fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005;32:2–8. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0103OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Eltzschig HK, Ibla JC, Furuta GT, Leonard MO, Jacobson KA, Enjyoji K, Robson SC, Colgan SP. Coordinated adenine nucleotide phosphohydrolysis and nucleoside signaling in posthypoxic endothelium: Role of ectonucleotidases and adenosine a2b receptors. J Exp Med. 2003;198:783–796. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Linden J. Molecular approach to adenosine receptors: Receptor-mediated mechanisms of tissue protection. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001;41:775–787. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Feoktistov I, Ryzhov S, Zhong H, Goldstein AE, Matafonov A, Zeng D, Biaggioni I. Hypoxia modulates adenosine receptors in human endothelial and smooth muscle cells toward an a2b angiogenic phenotype. Hypertension. 2004;44:649–654. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000144800.21037.a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Kong T, Westerman KA, Faigle M, Eltzschig HK, Colgan SP. Hif-dependent induction of adenosine a2b receptor in hypoxia. Faseb J. 2006;20:2242–2250. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-6419com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Eckle T, Faigle M, Grenz A, Laucher S, Thompson LF, Eltzschig HK. A2b adenosine receptor dampens hypoxia-induced vascular leak. Blood. 2008;111:2024–2035. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-117044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Yang Z, Day YJ, Toufektsian MC, Xu Y, Ramos SI, Marshall MA, French BA, Linden J. Myocardial infarct-sparing effect of adenosine a2a receptor activation is due to its action on cd4+ t lymphocytes. Circulation. 2006;114:2056–2064. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.649244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Teuscher E, Weidlich V. Adenosine nucleotides, adenosine and adenine as angiogenesis factors. Biomed Biochim Acta. 1985;44:493–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Dusseau JW, Hutchins PM, Malbasa DS. Stimulation of angiogenesis by adenosine on the chick chorioallantoic membrane. Circ Res. 1986;59:163–170. doi: 10.1161/01.res.59.2.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Feoktistov I, Goldstein AE, Ryzhov S, Zeng D, Belardinelli L, Voyno-Yasenetskaya T, Biaggioni I. Differential expression of adenosine receptors in human endothelial cells: Role of a2b receptors in angiogenic factor regulation. Circ Res. 2002;90:531–538. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000012203.21416.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Feoktistov I, Ryzhov S, Goldstein AE, Biaggioni I. Mast cell-mediated stimulation of angiogenesis: Cooperative interaction between a2b and a3 adenosine receptors. Circ Res. 2003;92:485–492. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000061572.10929.2D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Xi J, McIntosh R, Shen X, Lee S, Chanoit G, Criswell H, Zvara DA, Xu Z. Adenosine a2a and a2b receptors work in concert to induce a strong protection against reperfusion injury in rat hearts. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2009;47:684–690. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Philipp S, Yang XM, Cui L, Davis AM, Downey JM, Cohen MV. Postconditioning protects rabbit hearts through a protein kinase c-adenosine a2b receptor cascade. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;70:308–314. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Kuno A, Critz SD, Cui L, Solodushko V, Yang XM, Krahn T, Albrecht B, Philipp S, Cohen MV, Downey JM. Protein kinase c protects preconditioned rabbit hearts by increasing sensitivity of adenosine a2b-dependent signaling during early reperfusion. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2007;43:262–271. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Kuno A, Solenkova NV, Solodushko V, Dost T, Liu Y, Yang XM, Cohen MV, Downey JM. Infarct limitation by a protein kinase g activator at reperfusion in rabbit hearts is dependent on sensitizing the heart to a2b agonists by protein kinase c. American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology. 2008;295:H1288–H1295. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00209.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Berwick ZC, Payne GA, Lynch B, Dick GM, Sturek M, Tune JD. Contribution of adenosine a(2a) and a(2b) receptors to ischemic coronary dilation: Role of k(v) and k(atp) channels. Microcirculation. 2010;17:600–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00054.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Zhan E, McIntosh VJ, Lasley RD. Adenosine aa and ab receptors are both required for adenosine a receptor-mediated cardioprotection. American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology. 2011;301:H1183–1189. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00264.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Desai A, Victor-Vega C, Gadangi S, Montesinos MC, Chu CC, Cronstein BN. Adenosine a2a receptor stimulation increases angiogenesis by down-regulating production of the antiangiogenic matrix protein thrombospondin 1. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67:1406–1413. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.007807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

