Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):563–571.

Neospora caninum Infection during the First Gestation of Holstein Heifers That Consume Food Contaminated Naturally with Zearalenone under Field Conditions

Carlos CRUZ-VÁZQUEZ 1,*, Juan VITAL-GUTIÉRREZ 1, Leticia MEDINA-ESPARZA 1, Luis ORTEGA-MORA 2, Arturo VALDIVIA-FLORES 3, Teódulo QUEZADA-TRISTÁN 3, Agustín ORIHUELA-TRUJILLO 4
PMCID: PMC5756306  PMID: 29317881

Abstract

Background:

This work studied the natural infection of Neospora caninum during the first gestation of heifers in a dairy farm in animals consuming a ration co ntaminated naturally with Zearalenone (ZEA), and to find out effect of mycotoxin in the levels of estrogen (E) and progesterone (P4) and that‘s relation to the infection to N. caninum and in the abortions.

Methods:

The study was conducted in a dairy farm located in El Llano municipality, in Aguascalientes, Mexico, in 2013. Two groups were formed, the group “A” with 20 seronegative animals to N. caninum, and group “B” with 20 seropositive. Once a month was determined the levels of total IgG to N. caninum, the serum concentration of E and P4, and the level of ZEA in the ration; in cases of abortion, fetal brain samples were taken to identify the presence of N. caninum DNA.

Results:

In group “A”, was observed two subgroups: seronegative (60%) and seroconverted (40%), and three abortions. In group “B”, all animals maintain their serostatus, and three animals aborted. All abortions were positive for N. caninum DNA. The level of ZEA in the ration has an average of 426 μg/kg; during the gestation did not identify that animals suffer any alteration in the levels of E or P4. No statistical differences among the studied variables (levels of E and P) in time (nine months of gestation) were detected. It was not identified any interaction with the natural exposure to ZEA intake in any of the groups under study.

Conclusion:

The chronic ingestion of ZEA does not affect serum concentrations of E and P4 during gestation of heifers under study and cannot be related to the infection for N. caninum and the abortion.

Keywords: Neospora caninum , Natural infection , Zearalenone , Estradiol , Progesterone , Dairy cattle

Introduction

Neospora caninum (Apicomplexa, Sarcocystidae), is a protozoan parasite with heteroxene life cycle where the domestic dog and coyote appear as the main definitive hosts, while cattle and a wide range of animals, both domestic and wild, can act as intermediate hosts; herbivores can become infected by ingesting water and food contaminated with oocysts excreted by the definitive host, while a chronically infected female can transmit the parasite to the fetus through the placenta highly efficient way, it is responsible for the perpetuation of infection in herds (1, 2). In dairy cattle can cause early fetal death, embryo resorption, neonatal death, and abortions, especially in the second trimester of pregnancy, thus affecting the reproductive parameters, the replacement program and milk production (3).

Bovine neosporosis is recognized as a major cause of abortion in dairy cattle worldwide, estimated annual losses of $ 842.9 million dollars (4). In Mexico, the presence of N. caninum has been documented in cattle (57), sheep (8), as well as dogs (9, 10), and some wild species (11, 12), considered a major reproductive disease that causes losses of 68.5 and 94.8 million dollars annually in the dairy and meat industry, respectively (4).

Several risk factors to bovine neosporosis have been identified (1, 13); the literature reports poor feed quality and feeds contamination with mycotoxins as risk factors that may induce recrudescence of a latent N. caninum infection because mycotoxins cause immune suppression and reproductive disorders (14, 15).

Zearalenone (ZEA) is a mycotoxin produced by genus Fusarium, found as a natural contaminant of corn, barley, wheat, oats, sorghum and silage of these cereals, particularly in corn and wheat. ZEA is an estrogenic nonsteroidal mycotoxin whose toxic effects seems to depend on their interaction with estrogen receptors and are associated with infertility, enlargement of the mammary gland, reduced milk production, and vaginitis, especially in heifers, also has been reported hyperestrogenism, rectal and vaginal prolapse as well as abortions, delayed ovulation, flaws in the conception, implantation and development of the fetus (16, 17). There is no information in the literature on the effect of the ZEA in animals infected with N. caninum under field conditions, information needed to confirm its role in the epidemiology of this parasitic disease.

This work was developed under field conditions to study the dynamics of the natural infection of N. caninum during the first gestation of Holstein heifers in a dairy farm in animals consuming a ration contaminated naturally with ZEA. Moreover, to find out if this mycotoxin has some effect on the levels of estrogen and progesterone in the animals under study and if this effect could have some relation with the infection for N. caninum and eventually in the abortions.

Materials and Methods

Study site

This observational study, conducted on a dairy farm located in the El Llano municipality, in the state of Aguascalientes, located in the north-central Mexico, at an average altitude of 1995 m above sea level, with a semi-dry warm climate with summer rains. The farm maintains Holstein cattle in a free confinement system, characterized by open pens, with dirt floors, shaded area, and concrete drinking and feeding troughs, providing 40 m2 per animal (18). The ration consisted of silage triticale (58%), corn silage (38%), triticale as hay milled (3%), and a commercial concentrate with 14% crude protein (1%), the ingredients were properly mixed to offer themselves as totally mixed ration (TMR), supplied twice daily (7:00 and 15:00). The dairy was free of brucellosis and had a vaccination program to prevent BVD, IBR and leptospirosis. The farm had the presence of five dogs of different breed, sex and age, circulating freely in the facilities, which eventually consumed aborted fetuses and fetal residues.

Groups under study

Two groups were formed, each with 20 heifers with 12 to 14 months of age, divided as follows: Group A, with 20 seronegative animals to N. caninum, and Group B, with 20 seropositive. A serum sample from each heifer was subjected to indirect ELISA test as described later (19) to determine his serological status before to start the study. All animals were individually identified and maintained in the same lodging pen. The heifers were artificially inseminated at estrous naturally present and were monitored since its first service until presents calving or abortion. Information about reproductive management and health were registered.

Sampling

Blood samples were taken in all animals once a month by puncture of the caudal vein with new vacutainer equipment without anticoagulant. Samples were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min to obtain the serum that was then stored at −20 °C until its use. In cases of abortion, it was coming to perform necropsy fetus to obtain brain samples (20), in addition to collect a serum sample from the aborted cow, all samples were stored at −20 °C until its use; the age of the aborted fetus was calculated using the date of the last insemination of the cow. A sampling of the TMR supplied in the farm was conducted once a month, it was performed by means of the technique of “W” applied in the feeding of animals, so that took five samples of 1.0 kg, at a distance of 2 m about one another. The samples were placed in a new plastic bag, from which a sub-sample of 1.0 kg properly mixed was obtained stored at −20 °C until determination of ZEA (21).

Serological test

The detection of total serum IgG specific to N. caninum was developed by applying the indirect ELISA test (19), using as antigen soluble extract of tachyzoites N. caninum obtained from cell culture at a concentration of 910 μg/ml, providing a concentration of 0.15 μg per well, diluted in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6; 0.1M); sera were tested at a dilution of 1:100 in PBS-Tween 0.05%, using appropriate controls. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 405 nm. Serum samples were analyzed in duplicate and the average value of the optical density (OD) was converted into the relative index percent (IRPC) by using the following formula: IRPC = (O.D.405 sample – O.D.405 negative control) / (O.D.405 positive control – O.D.405 negative control) x100. Samples with IRPC≥ 8.2 were considered positive. The serostatus of the animals was investigated on a monthly basis throughout pregnancy or until due to abortion.

Detection of DNA of N. caninum in aborted fetal tissue using nested PCR

Genomic DNA from brain tissue samples was extracted using a commercial Maxwell® 16 gDNA Purification Kit, developed for the automated Maxwell® 16 System (Promega, Wisconsin, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. For the detection of parasite DNA, a nested-PCR procedure based on the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region of N. caninum was carried out (22). In each batch of PCR amplifications, DNA from N. caninum tachyzoites was included as positive controls. Negative controls, including reactions without template and extractions of bovine DNA negative to N. caninum by ITS-1 PCR, were also included at each batch of PCR’s. Secondary amplification product (249 bp) was visualized by 1.8% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining (23).

Detection of ZEA in food samples

The food samples were analyzed for the quantitative detection of ZEA through competitive ELISA, using a commercial kit (Ridascreen Fast Zearalenon SC, R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany), having a detection limit of 5 μg/kg and for quantification 16 μg/kg. Prior to ELISA analysis, samples were milled to give a particle size between 500 and 800 μ, homogenized and instructions issued by the manufacturer were followed. The test was run with 50 μL of filtrate from the sample in duplicate, and reading the absorbance at 450 nm. The calculation of the results was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the software provided by the same (RidaSoft Win).

Detection of hormone levels in serum by radioimmunoassay (RIA)

The determination of the levels of E and P4 was developed monthly by solid phase RIA using the following packages: Coat-A-Count Progesterone and Coat-A-Count Estradiol (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., Los Angeles, CA.). The first with analytical sensitivity of 0.02 ng/ml, and an intra-assay coefficient of variation and inter 9.51 and 8.96%, respectively, and the second with analytical sensitivity of 8 pg/ml, with an intra-assay coefficient of variation and inter 5.92% and 6.0%, respectively. The test was developed in the Laboratory of Endocrinology, Department of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry of the National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Information analysis

The dynamic of seroestatus to N. caninum was described in all animals along the gestational period using average values of IRPC; these values were analysed using ANOVA and Student’s-T-test (P<0.05). The monthly level of ZEA in TMR was registered and the mean and standard deviation were calculated. Information on the results of the detection levels of E and P4 in serum underwent the procedure GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations), in order to detect differences between the studied variables (levels of E and P4) in the time (nine months pregnant) and its possible interaction with natural exposure to ZEA intake (P<0.05). The procedure was developed using Stata 13 statistical package (Stata Corp. LP). The following reproductive parameters were calculated: services per conception, pregnancy rate to first, second and third service, percentage of abortions and calving rate in each group under study.

The Committee on Use and Care of Animals of the Instituto Tecnológico El Llano Aguascalientes approved this project. The owner of the dairy farm gave their consent to study their animals. Adequate veterinary care was provided to all animals under study.

Results

The dynamics of the immune response in the group A (seronegative) shown in Fig. 1. Three different subgroups were described: a) seronegative, in which 12/20 animals (60%) maintained their serostatus, b) seroconverted, in which 8/20 animals (40%) presented sero-status change, which happened in the second trimester, and c) aborted, with 3/8 animals which seroconverted before the abortion. The samples of fetal brain tissue analyzed by nested PCR detected DNA of N. caninum in all cases.

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Dynamics of immune response (expressed as IRPC) during gestation of naturally infected heifers (Group A)

In the group B (seropositive), all animals maintained their serostatus, but two subgroups were described: a) seropositive, with 17/20, animals (85%) and b) aborted, with 3/20 animals (15%) that did in the last third of gestation (Fig. 2). The dynamics of the immune response in subgroups showed a similar pattern throughout gestation, detecting an increase in the IRPC from the third month that reached the highest level in the second third of gestation remaining at high levels until the end of it or at presentation of abortion. IRPC differences between the months of gestation were found (P <0.05). The samples of fetal brain tissue analyzed by nested PCR detected DNA of N. caninum in all cases.

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

Dynamics of immune response (expressed as IRPC) during gestation of naturally infected heifers (Group B)

The reproductive parameters of heifers are shown in Table 1, which were similar in the groups under study. In group A, two of the aborted fetuses had 120 d of gestational age and the other 150 d, while in group B, had 180, 210 and 240 d of gestation. No alterations were observed in reproductive health of animals. The presence of ZEA was detected throughout the study period; food samples analyzed showed levels in a range of 212 to 672 μg/kg, with a mean of 426 + 113.3 μg/kg as shown in the Table 2.

Table 1:

Reproductive parameters of Holstein heifers under study

Reproductive Parameter Group A Group B
Services/Conception 1.7 1.5
Pregnancy rate (%) 1st service 50 60
Pregnancy rate (%) 2nd service 80 70
Pregnancy rate (%) 3rd service 100 100
Abortions rate (%) 15 15
Calving rate (%) 85 85

Table 2:

Monthly level of ZEA (μg/kg), determined in the TMR supplied to heifers under study.

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Mean ± SD
ZEA 672 212 375 400 450 383 535 400 389 400 470 426 113.3

During pregnancy in animals that did not abort the presence of P4, both seropositive and seronegative, was evident from the beginning of the same, showing a decrease in the level of detection from the eighth months (Fig. 3). While for E, in both groups, the presence was undetectable or low in the first month and as the gestation progresses its value was increasing, reaching its highest value in the ninth month (Fig. 4). In the heifers that aborted the estradiol and P4 concentration was similar to those, they did not aborted. In all cases, in the sampling after the abortion was not possible to detect the presence of either hormone.

Fig. 3:

Fig. 3:

Mean Progesterone levels during gestation in groups under study

Fig. 4:

Fig. 4:

Mean Estradiol levels during gestation in groups under study

No statistical differences among the studied variables (levels of estradiol and progesterone) in time (nine months of gestation) were detected. It was not identified any interaction with the natural exposure to ZEA intake in any of the groups under study.

Discussion

The dynamics of specific immune response to N. caninum recorded during pregnancy allows estimating that in group A, the high seroconversion maybe explains by the coexistence of horizontal transmission and reactivation of chronic infection. The first one there were five dogs on the farm that circulated freely in the facilities, and the second seronegative animals with parasite cysts in the brain which probably caused the seroconversion (24); other studies report that seronegative animals may have parasitemia, which could lead to seroconversion (8).

The mechanisms of transmission and perpetuation of N. caninum in a herd is diverse, and that endogenous transmission plays an important role that can sometimes be underestimated, while horizontal transmission, particularly in farms with the presence of the definitive host, is constant and with high efficiency (1, 25). The seropositive animals (group B), suffered a chronic infection, in consequence, showed high levels of total IgG during gestation, which initiated with an increase since the third month; chronic infection does not necessarily cause the abortion because most infected animals have normal pregnancies, however, they are able to efficiently transmit the infection to their offspring (1, 2, 25).

Different studies have documented an increase in the level of antibodies from the third month of gestation and may be more evident on the second third of gestation (2631). In the present study, the third month is a starting point to experiment an increase in the level of total IgG. However, high records were detected in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, this behavior may be due to different factors internal and external related to the fetus and mother, which combine to define the destination of infection, either abortion or offspring apparently healthy but infected congenitally (25, 27). The heifers that had abortions in the group A shown an increase of total IgG before to abortion, since the third month and may be infected by horizontal transmission, in these cases the aborted fetuses had between 120 and 150 d of gestation. The aborted animals in the group B, had seropositive animals chronically infected because they showed an increase in the values of IRPC from the third month of gestation, aborted fetuses in this group had between 180 and 240 d of gestation. The frequency of abortions by N. caninum is greater between 150 and 210 d of gestation and that high levels of total IgG show the existence of a chronic infection (1, 13, 25). This observation confirms the wide parasite’s ability to remain in a herd.

The TMR supplied to heifers under study was contaminated naturally during the whole period of study with ZEA; the tolerable intake of ZEA in dairy cattle has not been clearly defined, but several authors believe that this value is 250 μg/kg, although others mention that the limit is up to 500 μg/kg (17, 32). Clinical signs of hyperestrogenism due ZEA intake are observed infrequently in cattle, and only following the ingestion of highly contaminated silage or a long-term exposure to contaminated feed materials (33, 34). Within the rumen, the protozoal population has the highest capacity to detoxify ingested mycotoxins (35). We expected an elevation in estradiol levels during gestation due long-term ingestion of ZEA, perhaps more important in N. caninum seropositive heifers and eventually in cases of abortion. However, the hormonal profile of heifers during gestation showed no abnormalities that indicate the presence of hyperestrogenism, even in seropositive or aborted animals. Therefore, no effect of ZEA is presented in the secretion of E and consequently in their relationship with P4, since the levels recorded in both hormones were observed within values reported in the literature as normal (3639).

N. caninum modify endocrine patterns of P4, cortisol and PAG 2 (Pregnancy-Associated Glycoprotein) in animals chronically infected (4042). N. caninum seropositive animals show concentrations of P4 lower than those identified in seronegative cows in the first six months of gestation (43). In the present study, no significant differences in the levels of P4 among seropositive or seronegative groups were observed during gestation. In animals under study, reproductive parameters not indicated evidence of infertility as might have been expected.

Conclusion

The parasite has a wide capacity to perpetuate the infection in the herd and the chronic ingestion of ZEA through the TMR naturally contaminated with this mycotoxin does not affect serum concentrations of E and P4 during gestation of heifers seropositive and seronegative to N. caninum infection, and cannot be related with the infection for N. caninum and the abortion.

Acknowledgements

The authors like to express their appreciation to the Dr. Armando Martinez de Anda (Autonomous University of Aguascalientes) and Dra. Esther Collantes Fernández (SALUVET group), for their valuable contributions to this work, we thank the dairy farms that provided the necessary facilities for the development of the study. This work was financed by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT-CB 0178546) and for PROMEP-SEP (12/2037).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interests

None of the authors has any conflict of interest in regard to this article.

References

  • 1.Dubey JP, Schares G. Neosporosis in animals-the last five years. Vet Parasitol. 2011;180(1–2):90–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goodswen SJ, Kennedy PJ, Ellis JT. A review of the infection, genetics, and evolution of Neospora caninum: From the past to the present. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;13:133–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Almería S, López-Gatius F. Bovine neosporosis: Clinical and practical aspects. Res Vet Sci. 2013;95(2):303–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reichel MP, Alejandra Ayanegui-Alcérreca M, Gondim LF, et al. What is the global economic impact of Neospora caninum in cattle - The billion dollar question. I Int J Parasitol. 2013;43(2):133–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garcia-Vazquez Z, Rosario-Cruz R, Ramos-Aragon A, et al. Neospora caninum seropositivity and association with abortions in dairy cows in Mexico. Vet Parasitol. 2005;134(1–2):61–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garcia-Vazquez Z, Rosario-Cruz R, Mejia-Estrada F, et al. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum antibodies in beef cattle in three southern states of Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009;41(5):749–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gutiérrez GJ, Cruz-Vázquez C, Medina-Esparza L, et al. Factores de manejo asociados con la seroprevalencia a la infección por Neospora caninum en ganado lechero de Aguascalientes, México. Vet Mex. 2007;38:261–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Castañeda-Hernández A, Cruz-Vázquez C, Medina-Esparza L. Neospora caninum: seroprevalence and DNA detection in blood of sheep from Aguascalientes, Mexico. Small Rumin Res. 2014;119:182–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sánchez GF, Morales SE, Martínez MJ, et al. Determination and correlation of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in dogs and cattle from Mexico. Can J Vet Res. 2003;67(2):142–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cruz-Vázquez C, Medina-Esparza L, Marentes A, et al. Seroepidemiological study of Neospora caninum infection on dogs found in dairy farms and urban areas of Aguascalientes, Mexico. Vet Parasitol. 2008;157(1–2):139–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Olamendi-Portugal M, Caballero-Ortega H, Correa D, et al. Serosurvey of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in white-tailed deer from northern Mexico. Vet Parasitol. 2012;189(2–4):369–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Medina-Esparza L, Macías L, Ramos-Parra M, et al. Frequency of infection by Neospora caninum in wild rodents associated with dairy farms in Aguascalientes, Mexico. Vet Parasitol. 2013;191(1–2):11–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dubey JP, Schares G, Ortega-Mora LM. Epidemiology and control of neosporosis and Neospora caninum. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(2):323–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bartels CJ, Wouda W, Schukken YH. Risk factors for Neospora caninum-associated abortion storms in dairy herds in The Netherlands (1995 to 1997). Theriogenology. 1999;52(2):247–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Conzuelo SR, Medina-Esparza L, Ramos-Para M, et al. Factores de riesgo asociados a la seroprevalencia de anticuerpos a Neospora caninum en ganado lechero de Aguascalientes, México. Rev Mex Cienc Pec. 2011;2:15–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zinedine A, Soriano JM, Moltó JC, et al. Review on the toxicity, occurrence, metabolism, detoxification, regulations and intake of zearalenone: An oestrogenic mycotoxin. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45:1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cortinovis C, Pizzo F, Spicer LJ, et al. Fusarium mycotoxins: Effects on reproductive function in domestic animals: A review. Theriogenology. 2013;80(6):557–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vitela MI, Cruz-Vázquez C, Solano J. Comportamiento de vacas Holstein mantenidas en un sistema de estabulación libre, en invierno, en zona árida, México. Arch Med Vet. 2005;37:23–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alvarez-García G, Pereira-Bueno J, Gómez-Bautista M, et al. Pattern of recognition of Neospora caninum tachyzoite antigens by naturally infected pregnant cattle and aborted foetuses. Vet Parasitol. 2002;107(1–2):15–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Medina L, Cruz-Vázquez C, Quezada T, et al. Survey of Neospora caninum infection by nested PCR in aborted fetuses from dairy farms in Aguascalientes, Mexico. Vet Parasitol. 2006;136(3–4):187–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bautista A, Santos S. Manual de técnicas de muestreo para manejadores de recursos naturales. UNAM: México; 2004. p. 351–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Buxton D, Maley SW, Wright S, et al. The pathogenesis of experimental neosporosis in pregnant sheep. J Comp Pathol. 1998;118(4):267–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Regidor-Cerrillo J, Gómez-Bautista M, Pereira-Bueno J, et al. Isolation and genetic characterization of Neospora caninum from asymptomatic calves in Spain. Parasitology. 2008;135(14):1651–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Santos SL, de Souza Costa K, Gondim LQ, et al. Investigation of Neospora caninum, Hammondia sp., and Toxoplasma gondii in tissues from slaughtered beef cattle in Bahia, Brazil. Parasitol Res. 2010;106(2):457–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dubey JP, Buxton D, Wouda W. Pathogenesis of bovine neosporosis. J Comp Pathol. 2006;134:267–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stenlund S, Kindahl H, Magnusson U, et al. Serum antibody profile and reproductive performance during two consecutive pregnancies of cows naturally infected with Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol. 1999;85(4):227–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pereira-Bueno J, Quintanilla-Gozalo A, Seijas-Carbalfedo A, et al. Observational studies in Neospora caninum infected dairy cattle: pattern of transmission and age-related antibody fluctuations. In: (Eds. A. Hemphill; B. Gottstein). A European perspective on Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:906–909. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guy CS, Williams DJL, Kelly DF, et al. Neospora caninum in persistently infected pregnant cows: spontaneous transplacental infection is associated with an acute increase in maternal antibody. Vet Rec. 2001;149(15):443–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Piergili Fioretti D, Pasquali P, Diaferia M, et al. Neospora caninum infection and congenital transmission: serological and parasitological study of cows up to the fourth gestation. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2003;50(8):399–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Andrianarivo AG, Anderson ML, Rowe JD, et al. Immune responses during pregnancy in heifers naturally infected with Neospora caninum with and without immunization. Parasitol Res. 2005;96(1):24–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Špilovská S, Moskwa B, Reiterová K. Kinetics of anti-Neospora antibodies during the period of two consecutive pregnancies in chronically infected dairy cows. Acta Parasitol. 2013;58(4):463–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Minervini F, Dell’Aquila ME. Zearalenone and reproductive function in farm animals. Int J Mol Sci. 2008;9(12):2570–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bloomquist C, Davidson JN, Pearson EG. Zearalenone toxicosis in prepubertal dairy heifers. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1982;180(2):164–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Coppock RW, Mostrom MS, Sparling CG, et al. Apparent zearalenone intoxication in a dairy herd from feeding spoiled acid-treated corn. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1990;32(3):246–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fink-Gremmels J. The role of mycotoxins in the health and performance of dairy cows. Vet J. 2008;176(1):84–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pope GS, Gupta SK, Munro IB. Progesterone levels in the systemic plasma of pregnant, cycling and ovariectomized cows. J Reprod Fertil. 1969;20(3):369–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Knickerbrocker JJ, Drost M, Tatcher WW. Endocrine patterns during the initiation of puberty, the estrous cycle, pregnancy and parturition in cattle. In: Morrow DA, editor. Current Theraphy in Theriogenology 2. Saunders: Philadephia: 1986. p. 117–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pape-Zambito DA, Magliaro AL, Kensinger RS. 17Beta-estradiol and estrone concentrations in plasma and milk during bovine pregnancy. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91(1):127–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Franco J, Uribe VLF. Hormonas reproductivas de importancia veterinaria en hembras domésticas rumiantes. Biosalud. 2012;11:41–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Abdelfatah-Hassan A, Almería S, Serrano B, et al. The inseminating bull and plasma pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) levels were related to peripheral leukocyte counts during the late pregnancy/early postpartum period in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2012;77(7):1390–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.García-Ispierto I, Nogareda C, Yániz JL, et al. Neospora caninum and Coxiella burnetii seropositivity are related to endocrine pattern changes during gestation in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2010;74(2):212–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.García-Ispierto I, Almería S, Serrano B, et al. Plasma concentrations of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins measured using anti-bovine PAG-2 antibodies on day 120 of gestation predict abortion in dairy cows naturally infected with Neospora caninum. Reprod Domest Anim. 2013;48(4):613–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.García-Ispierto I, Serrano-Pérez B, Almería S, et al. Effects of crossbreeding on endocrine patterns determined in pregnant beef/dairy cows naturally infected with Neospora caninum. Theriogenology. 2015;83(4):491–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES