Skip to main content
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report logoLink to Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
. 2018 Jan 5;66(51-52):1398–1401. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm665152a2

Health Care Provider Counseling for Physical Activity or Exercise Among Adults with Arthritis — United States, 2002 and 2014

Jennifer M Hootman 1,, Louise B Murphy 1, John D Omura 2, Teresa J Brady 1, Michael Boring 1, Kamil E Barbour 1, Charles G Helmick 1
PMCID: PMC5758301  PMID: 29300722

Arthritis affects an estimated 54 million U.S. adults and, as a common comorbidity, can contribute arthritis-specific limitations or barriers to physical activity or exercise for persons with diabetes, heart disease, and obesity (1). The American College of Rheumatology’s osteoarthritis management guidelines recommend exercise as a first-line, nonpharmacologic strategy to manage arthritis symptoms (2), and a Healthy People 2020 objective is to increase health care provider counseling for physical activity or exercise among adults with arthritis.* To determine the prevalence and percentage change from 2002 to 2014 in receipt of health care provider counseling for physical activity or exercise (counseling for exercise) among adults with arthritis, CDC analyzed 2002 and 2014 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. From 2002 to 2014, the age-adjusted prevalence of reporting health care provider counseling for exercise among adults with arthritis increased 17.6%, from 51.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 49.9%–53.8%) to 61.0% (CI = 58.6%–63.4%) (p<0.001). The age-adjusted prevalence of reporting health care provider counseling for exercise among persons with arthritis who described themselves as inactive increased 20.1%, from 47.2% (CI = 44.0%–50.4%) in 2002 to 56.7% (CI = 52.3%–61.0%) in 2014 (p = 0.001). Prevalence of counseling for exercise has increased significantly since 2002; however, approximately 40% of adults with arthritis are still not receiving counseling for exercise. Improving health care provider training and expertise in exercise counseling and incorporating prompts into electronic medical records are potential strategies to facilitate counseling for exercise that can help adults manage their arthritis and comorbid conditions.

NHIS is an ongoing survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population that gathers data on a variety of health topics. CDC analyzed data from 2002 (adult respondents aged ≥18 years = 31,044; response rate = 74.3%) and 2014 (36,697 adults; response rate = 58.9%). Arthritis was defined as a “yes” response to the question, “Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health care professional that you have arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus or fibromyalgia?” Health care provider counseling for exercise was defined as a “yes” response to the question “Has a doctor or other health professional ever suggested physical activity or exercise to help your arthritis or joint symptoms?” Age-adjusted percentages and CIs for health care provider counseling for exercise were calculated overall and by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. Physical activity was calculated as minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity using six questions regarding the (typical/usual) frequency, intensity, and duration of aerobic physical activity. The level was categorized as active (≥150 minutes/week moderate-intensity equivalent activity), insufficiently active (some moderate-intensity equivalent activity but not enough to meet active definition), and inactive (no moderate-intensity equivalent activity that lasted at least 10 minutes). Age-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) to assess the relationship between counseling for exercise and physical inactivity were calculated using logistic regression.

Changes in age-adjusted prevalence of counseling for exercise were examined across the 5 years (2002, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2014) in which both arthritis and counseling for exercise questions were included on the survey. All analyses included adjustment for the multistage complex survey design, including applying sampling weights to make estimates representative of the U.S. civilian, noninstitutionalized population. Estimates were age-standardized to the 2000 projected U.S. population using three age groups (18–44 years, 45–64 years, and ≥65 years).§ Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) in percentages were determined using t-tests.

In 2002 and 2014, the age-adjusted prevalences of health care provider counseling for exercise among adults with arthritis were 51.9% and 61.0%, respectively, representing a 17.6% increase (p<0.001) (Figure). In 2014, all subgroups exceeded the Healthy People 2020 age-standardized target of 57.4% for adults with arthritis, with the exception of non-Hispanic other races (53.8%), underweight/normal weight persons (50.0%), current smokers (56.9%), inactive persons (56.7%), and persons without a primary care provider (50.7%). In 2002 and 2014, age-adjusted prevalences of health care provider counseling for exercise among adults with arthritis who were inactive were 47.2% and 56.7%, respectively, representing a 20.1% increase (p = 0.001) (Table). Overall, adults with arthritis and obesity had a higher prevalence of having received counseling for exercise than did those who were underweight/normal weight (70.7% versus 50.0% in 2014), but prevalence estimates by activity status were not statistically different within body mass index categories.

FIGURE.

The figure above is a bar chart showing the percentage of adults with arthritis who reported receiving health care provider counseling for exercise in the National Health Interview Surveys of 2002, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2014, along with the Healthy People 2020 target.

Percentage of adults with arthritis who reported receiving health care provider counseling for exercise — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2002, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2014

TABLE. Percentage of adults with arthritis who reported receiving health care provider counseling for exercise, by selected characteristics — National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2002 and 2014.

Characteristic 2002
2014
% change 2002 to 2014
No. in sample* No. in U.S. (thousands) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-adjusted§ % (95% CI) No. in sample* No. in U.S. (thousands) Unadjusted % (95% CI) Age-adjusted§ % (95% CI)
Overall
3,572
22,355
52.8 (51.3–54.3)
51.9 (49.9–53.8)
5,639
33,108
61.6 (60.2–63.1)
61.0 (58.6–63.4)
17.6
Age group (yrs)
18–44
616
4,214
50.1 (46.8–53.4)
50.1 (46.8–53.4)
693
4,750
59.9 (55.7–64.0)
59.9 (55.7–64.0)
19.6
45–64
1,545
10,220
55.6 (53.4–57.8)
55.6 (53.4–57.8)
2,340
15,184
63.4 (61.2–65.5)
63.4 (61.2–65.5)
14.0
≥65
1,411
7,921
50.9 (48.8–53.0)
50.9 (48.8–53.0)
2,606
13,174
60.4 (58.3–62.4)
60.4 (58.3–62.4)
18.6
Sex
Male
1,084
7,815
46.7 (44.5–49.0)
44.8 (42.0–47.7)
1,910
12,683
58.7 (56.4–61.1)
58.3 (54.7–61.9)
30.2
Female
2,488
14,540
56.7 (55.0–58.5)
56.8 (54.4–59.2)
3,729
20,425
63.6 (61.9–65.3)
62.9 (59.8–66.0)
10.8
Race/Ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic
2,619
17,867
52.1 (50.4–53.7)
51.1 (48.8–53.3)
3,909
24,838
60.5 (58.8–62.2)
60.9 (57.9–63.8)
19.2
Black, non-Hispanic
530
2,636
58.5 (54.8–62.2)
59.0 (54.1–63.8)
894
4,022
64.9 (61.4–68.3)
63.0 (57.6–68.1)
6.7
Hispanic
362
1,412
53.8 (49.1–58.3)
52.3 (47.2–57.4)
597
3,120
67.5 (63.0–71.6)
64.7 (58.6–70.4)
23.7
Other race, non-Hispanic
61
440
48.4 (38.3–58.6)
43.4 (33.3–54.0)
239
1,127
61.0 (52.2–69.2)
53.8 (41.3–65.8)
24.1
Education
Less than high school graduate
739
3,896
45.9 (43.0–48.8)
45.9 (41.2–50.7)
988
4,998
59.0 (55.6–62.3)
59.0 (52.6–65.0)
28.5
High school graduate or equivalent
1,087
7,137
52.3 (49.7–54.9)
49.8 (46.2–53.4)
1,554
9,204
59.9 (56.9–62.9)
58.1 (53.5–62.5)
16.7
Technical school/Some college
1,039
6,541
56.3 (53.8–58.8)
55.2 (52.2–58.1)
1,730
10,379
62.9 (60.5–65.4)
64.2 (60.6–67.6)
16.4
University degree
680
4,614
56.0 (52.8–59.2)
55.1 (50.9–59.2)
1,346
8,362
63.6 (60.8–66.4)
60.9 (56.0–65.6)
10.6
Work status
Employed
1,430
9,899
52.5 (50.3–54.7)
51.2 (48.8–53.7)
2,042
13,518
61.1 (58.7–63.5)
60.4 (57.2–63.5)
18.0
Unemployed
86
484
44.6 (36.4–53.1)
47.0 (38.2–55.9)
205
1,381
62.7 (55.0–69.7)
61.0 (52.3–69.0)
29.8
Unable to work/ Disabled
588
3,244
54.8 (51.3–58.2)
51.4 (46.4–56.3)
1,024
5,312
64.6 (61.3–67.8)
63.9 (58.5–69.0)
24.3
Other
1,464
8,710
53.0 (50.9–55.0)
59.8 (54.1–65.3)
2,365
12,890
60.9 (58.8–63.0)
58.7 (51.3–65.8)
−1.8
Arthritis limitations
Limited by arthritis
1,626
9,563
60.2 (58.1–62.3)
58.4 (55.3–61.4)
2,696
15,253
67.7 (65.4–69.9)
65.7 (61.4–69.8)
12.6
Not limited by arthritis
1,940
12,762
48.3 (46.3–50.2)
48.1 (45.7–50.6)
2,939
17,826
57.3 (55.4–59.1)
57.8 (54.9–60.6)
20.0
Self-rated health
Excellent/Very good
1,196
7,945
49.2 (46.8–51.5)
49.0 (46.2–51.8)
1,939
12,350
58.7 (56.6–60.8)
58.4 (55.1–61.7)
19.2
Good
1,203
7,759
55.4 (53.0–57.7)
54.3 (50.9–57.6)
1,929
11,353
63.9 (61.2–66.6)
61.8 (57.0–66.4)
14.0
Fair/Poor
1,170
6,637
54.8 (52.3–57.3)
53.9 (50.0–57.7)
1,770
9,400
63.0 (60.5–65.5)
64.6 (60.5–68.4)
19.9
BMI**
Underweight/Normal
914
5,622
45.9 (43.3–48.5)
46.5 (43.1–49.9)
1,186
6,987
51.3 (48.3–54.3)
50.0 (45.1–54.8)
7.6
Overweight
1,081
6,914
49.1 (46.7–51.5)
47.6 (44.1–51.2)
1,753
10,734
60.4 (57.9–62.8)
58.9 (54.8–62.8)
23.7
Obese
1,387
8,638
61.3 (58.9–63.6)
59.6 (56.3–62.7)
2,461
14,066
70.1 (67.9–72.2)
70.7 (67.3–73.9)
18.7
Smoking status
Current smoker
655
4,136
48.8 (45.7–51.9)
47.9 (44.4–51.4)
904
5,451
56.8 (53.1–60.5)
56.9 (52.5–61.2)
18.8
Former smoker
1,170
7,597
52.7 (50.2–55.1)
51.6 (47.4–55.8)
1,848
10,997
64.1 (61.4–66.7)
63.6 (58.4–68.5)
23.3
Never smoker
1,713
10,418
54.4 (52.4–56.4)
53.8 (51.0–56.5)
2,845
16,453
61.8 (59.8–63.9)
62.0 (58.2–65.5)
15.2
Physical activity level
Inactive
1,504
8,765
48.4 (46.3–50.5)
47.2 (44.0–50.4)
2,070
11,485
56.6 (54.3–59.0)
56.7 (52.3–61.0)
20.1
Insufficiently active
762
4,821
57.3 (54.1–60.4)
54.2 (49.6–58.7)
1,368
8,336
69.2 (65.8–72.3)
64.7 (58.5–70.5)
19.5
Sufficiently active
1,199
8,039
55.3 (53.0–57.6)
54.4 (51.6–57.3)
2,088
12,608
62.3 (60.2–64.4)
62.5 (59.5–65.3)
14.7
Have a primary care provider
No
261
1,468
42.3 (37.7–47.0)
42.3 (37.6–47.1)
399
2,338
52.9 (46.3–59.4)
50.7 (44.8–56.6)
20.0
Yes
3,292
20,766
53.6 (52.1–55.2)
53.1 (50.9–55.2)
5,190
30,538
62.6 (61.0–64.1)
62.6 (59.9–65.3)
18.0
No. of annual provider visits
None to three
1,075
7,098
46.7 (44.5–49.0)
45.2 (42.4–48.1)
1,999
11,899
56.0 (53.6–58.3)
56.4 (52.8–59.9)
24.7
Four to seven
1,028
6,539
53.3 (50.6–56.0)
55.7 (51.8–59.5)
1,720
10,363
65.1 (62.5–67.6)
63.7 (57.8–69.2)
14.4
Eight or more
1,408
8,373
58.8 (56.6–61.0)
57.8 (54.7–60.9)
1,819
10,311
66.3 (63.8–68.7)
66.1 (62.4–69.6)
14.3
No. of chronic conditions
None
47
276
50.3 (39.4–61.1)
46.0 (34.4–58.1)
111
710
66.2 (57.8–73.6)
63.3 (51.7–73.5)
37.5
One or two
2,089
13,496
51.2 (49.4–53.0)
50.5 (48.3–52.7)
2,993
18,431
58.9 (56.8–60.9)
58.7 (55.8–61.5)
16.2
Three or more 1,436 8,583 55.5 (53.2–57.8) 56.8 (52.3–61.3) 2,535 13,967 65.5 (63.3–67.5) 67.6 (63.2–71.7) 18.9

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index (kg/m2); CI = confidence interval.

* Unweighted sample size.

Weighted number in U.S. population in 1,000s.

§ Age-adjusted using the 2000 projected U.S. population.

Percentage change calculated using age-adjusted estimates.

** BMI levels: <25.0 underweight/normal weight; 25.0 to <30.0 overweight; ≥30.0 obese.

In both 2002 and 2014, adults with arthritis who did not receive health care provider counseling for exercise had a higher age-adjusted prevalence of physical inactivity. Compared with the referent group of active persons, the prevalence for 2002 was 41.4%, compared with 34.7% (age-adjusted PR = 1.2; CI = 1.1–1.3), and for 2014 was 36.8% compared with 30.5% (age-adjusted PR = 1.2; CI = 1.2–1.3).

Discussion

Among adults with arthritis, the prevalence of reported health care provider counseling for exercise increased from 51.9% in 2002 to 61.0% in 2014. However, it should be noted that, in a 2014 report, fewer than one third of primary care physicians said they provide exercise counseling for arthritis during office visits (3). Although the improvement among all health care providers is encouraging, opportunities exist to further increase counseling for exercise among adults with arthritis. This might be particularly true for some subgroups such as persons who are inactive and who might especially benefit from exercise counseling to help get them started.

Efforts to help health care providers identify patients with arthritis who are inactive, including strategies such as those from Exercise is Medicine (EIM), might help facilitate provider counseling for exercise during health care encounters. EIM’s goals are to have clinicians evaluate physical activity levels at every patient visit, assess whether patients are meeting physical activity guidelines, and provide exercise counseling and referral to appropriate therapeutic or community-based physical activity resources. The EIM website has free tools and resources to help providers incorporate these principles to improve chronic disease management in their practices. Other subgroups that have not reached the Healthy People 2020 target, including underweight/normal weight persons, current smokers, and certain racial/ethnic groups, warrant attention by health care providers during office visits. Adults without a primary health care provider also had a lower prevalence of receiving counseling for exercise. Other health care providers might need to be encouraged to provide exercise counseling, and adults without a primary provider might be encouraged to obtain one.

Health care providers and adults with arthritis agree that physical activity has important benefits for managing arthritis, and federal physical activity guidelines have been found reasonable for adults with arthritis (3,4). The 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans** recommend that persons with chronic medical conditions including osteoarthritis, engage in regular physical activity according to their abilities, and highlight that any activity is better than none. Health care providers can serve as valuable sources of exercise advice (4), as suggested by the finding that receiving counseling for exercise was associated with lower physical inactivity. However, health care providers often rate their confidence and ability to promote physical activity as low to medium (57). In one study, 61% of health care providers surveyed felt unsure about their knowledge and skills or that they did not have the needed knowledge and skills to provide counseling on exercise to patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis (8). Incorporating counseling into clinical training curriculum and continuing education programming (e.g., EIM) might encourage health care providers to provide exercise counseling. Other strategies include incorporating prompts into electronic medical records and training health care providers to provide easily tailored exercise prescriptions.

Providers can reduce arthritis-specific barriers to exercise by referring patients who are uncertain about exercising safely to evidence-based, community programs. Several community group and self-directed exercise programs are available for adults with arthritis (e.g., Enhance Fitness, Walk with Ease, and Active Living Every Day††) and can reduce pain and improve function, mobility, and mood.§§ Community based organizations, including the National Parks and Recreation Association¶¶ and the YMCA*** disseminate these evidence-based physical activity programs throughout the United States.

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, NHIS data are self-reported and might be susceptible to recall and social desirability biases. Second, NHIS is only representative of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population, and therefore, estimates do not include those living in long-term care facilities, prisons, or military personnel. Third, low response rates (74.3% in 2002 and 58.9% in 2014) might introduce response bias, although the sampling weights at least partially adjust for this potential bias. Finally, the exercise counseling question does not address the quality or frequency of the counseling.

Prevalence of health care provider counseling for exercise among adults with arthritis has increased significantly over more than a decade, but the prevalence of counseling remains low for a self-managed behavior (exercise) with proven benefits and few risks (8), especially among those who are inactive. Various strategies such as health care provider education and training in exercise counseling and electronic medical record prompts might increase health care provider counseling for exercise among adults with arthritis.

Summary.

What is already known about this topic?

The American College of Rheumatology’s osteoarthritis management guidelines recommend exercise as a first-line, nonpharmacologic strategy to manage arthritis symptoms. An estimated 54 million adults in the United States are affected by arthritis.

What is added by this report?

The prevalence of receiving health care provider counseling for exercise among adults with arthritis increased 17.6% from 51.9% in 2002 to 61.0% in 2014. However, nearly 40% of adults with arthritis still do not receive health care provider counseling for exercise. In addition, subgroups including non-Hispanic persons of other races, underweight/normal weight persons, current smokers, inactive persons, and persons without a primary health care provider, are still below the Healthy People 2020 target of 57.4%.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Health care provider education and training in exercise counseling, electronic medical record prompts, and connections to community programs might help increase health care provider counseling for exercise among adults with arthritis.

Conflict of Interest: No conflicts of interest were reported.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Boring M, Brady TJ. Vital signs: prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation—United States, 2013–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:246–53. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6609e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, et al. ; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:465–74. 10.1002/acr.21596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maserejian NN, Fischer MA, Trachtenberg FL, et al. Variations among primary care physicians in exercise advice, imaging, and analgesics for musculoskeletal pain: results from a factorial experiment. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014;66:147–56. 10.1002/acr.22143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brittain DR, Gyurcsik NC, McElroy M, Hillard SA. General and arthritis-specific barriers to moderate physical activity in women with arthritis. Womens Health Issues 2011;21:57–63. 10.1016/j.whi.2010.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hurkmans EJ, de Gucht V, Maes S, Peeters AJ, Ronday HK, Vliet Vlieland TP. Promoting physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: rheumatologists’ and health professionals’ practice and educational needs. Clin Rheumatol 2011;30:1603–9. 10.1007/s10067-011-1846-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Halls S, Law RJ, Jones JG, Markland DA, Maddison PJ, Thom JM. Health professionals’ perceptions of the effects of exercise on joint health in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Musculoskelet Care 2017;15:196–209. 10.1002/msc.1157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lillie K, Ryan S, Adams J. The educational needs of nurses and allied healthcare professionals caring for people with arthritis: results from a cross-sectional survey. Musculoskelet Care 2013;11:93–8. 10.1002/msc.1035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Geneen LJ, Moore RA, Clarke C, Martin D, Colvin LA, Smith BH. Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4:CD011279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES