Abstract
NFκB plays an important role in inflammation and bone remodelling. Tumour necrosis factor receptor associated factor 2 (TRAF2), a key component of NFκB signalling, has been identified as an oncogene, but its role in the regulation of breast cancer osteolytic metastasis remains unknown. Here, we report that stable overexpression of TRAF2 in parental and osteotropic sub-clones of human MDA-MB-231 (MDA-231) breast cancer cells increased cell growth and motility in vitro, whereas TRAF2 knockdown was inhibitory. In vivo, TRAF2 overexpression in the parental MDA-231-P cells enhanced tumour growth after orthotopic injection into the mammary fat pad of mice but failed to promote the metastasis of these cells to bone. In contrast, overexpression of TRAF2 in osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells increased skeletal tumour growth, enhanced osteoclast formation and worsened osteolytic bone loss after intra-tibial injection in mice. Mechanistic and functional studies in osteotropic MDA-231-BT and osteoclasts revealed that upregulation of TRAF2 increased the ability of osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells to migrate and to enhance osteoclastogenesis by a mechanism dependent, at least in part, on NFκB activation. Thus, the TRAF2/NFκB axis is implicated in the regulation of skeletal tumour burden and osteolysis associated with advanced breast cancer.
Introduction
TNF receptor associated factor (TRAF) super family of adaptor proteins plays an important role in inflammation, breast cancer and bone remodelling1–4. Of the 7 known members of the TRAF superfamily, TRAF2 is a common target for pro-inflammatory and tumour-derived factors such as tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin 1 (IL-1), receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL), transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), and cluster of differentiation 40 ligand (CD40L)2,3,5–9. Binding of these mediators to their receptors initiates the recruitment of TRAF2 to their respective receptors2,6,7,10–14 and triggers the activation of multiple intracellular signalling cascades including the canonical NFκB pathway2,5–8,15,16. TRAF2 also undergoes phosphorylation, protein–protein interaction with DNA and other TRAF molecules and functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to activate downstream events essential for NFκB activation3,15–19.
The TRAF2/NFκB signalling pathway plays a critical role in lactating mammary-gland development and breast cancer. Elevated TRAF2 expression correlates with breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis in patients8,20. In addition, TRAF2 regulates the activity of various breast cancer oncogenes, and inhibition of TRAF2 has been associated with reduction in mammary tumour growth6,10,12,17,19,21–23. Recently, TRAF2 has been described as an NFκB activating oncogene in breast epithelial cells6,7. Breast cancer cells in bone (osteotropic) cause bone damage by producing osteolytic factors that enhance osteoclastogenesis and inhibit osteoblast differentiation via NFκB activation24–26. TRAF2-mediated NFκB activation plays a key role in the regulation of bone remodelling, and numerous studies have demonstrated that inflammation-induced TRAF2 activation causes bone loss by increasing osteoclast formation and inhibiting osteoblast survival2,4,26–28. However, the role of TRAF2 in the development of breast cancer bone metastasis and its contribution to osteoclast and osteoblast changes associated with these metastases has not been investigated.
In the present study, we showed that cancer-specific TRAF2 expression contributes to breast cancer-induced osteolysis. Our in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro investigation showed that TRAF2 expression in the osteotropic MDA-231 human breast cancer cells increases tumour cell growth in bone, and enhances the ability of these cells to induce osteoclast formation and to cause osteolysis in mice. Thus, therapeutic targeting of TRAF2/NFκB signalling may be of value in protecting the skeleton from osteolytic bone damage associated with advanced breast cancer.
Results
Upregulation of TRAF2 enhances parental tumour cell growth in vitro and in vivo
TRAF2 enhances mammary tumour growth7, and we have observed that TRAF2 expression is upregulated in the human osteotropic MDA-231 breast cancer cell line when compared to their parental control (Fig. S1A). In view of this, we hypothesized that TRAF2 is implicated in bone metastasis, skeletal tumour growth and osteolysis associated with advanced breast cancer. We stably overexpressed (Fig. S1B,C) and knocked down (Fig. S1D,E) TRAF2 in the parental MDA-231-P and their osteotropic sub-clone MDA-231-BT (Fig. S1B–E), and assessed the growth and metastatic behaviour of these cells in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. First, we confirmed that TRAF2 overexpression in parental MDA-231-P enhanced migration within 6 hours, whereas its knockdown in these cells was inhibitory (Fig. 1A,B). Overexpression of TRAF2 also increased the invasion of parental MDA-231-P after 48 hours (Fig. 1C,D). Of note, TRAF2 overexpression or knockdown had no effect on the viability of parental MDA-231-P (Fig. 1E). Next, we evaluated the mammary tumour growth and bone metastasis of parental MDA-231-P in mice after orthotopic injection (Fig. 1F,H). Overexpression of TRAF2 enhanced MDA-231-P growth in the mammary fat pads (Fig. 1G) but failed to cause osteolytic lesions in mice (Fig. 1H). We also failed to detect any MDA-231-P cells expressing green fluorescent protein in bone aspirates ex vivo (data not shown).
Upregulation of TRAF2 enhances breast cancer-induced osteolysis in vivo
To test if TRAF2 is implicated in the regulation of osteolytic activity of breast cancer cells, we assessed skeletal tumour growth and osteolysis in mice after intra-tibial injection of the osteotropic sub-clone MDA-231-BT. Overexpression of TRAF2 in these cells markedly increased tumour growth in bone (Fig. 2A,B) and enhanced their ability to cause osteolysis (Fig. 2C,E). As shown in Fig. 2, panel D, detailed microCT analysis of bone samples from this experiment revealed significant reduction in trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) that is accompanied by reduced trabecular number and thickness, increased trabecular separation and decreased trabecular connectivity (increased trabecular pattern factor and SMI). We also detected significant increase in cortical porosity (Fig. 2E) whereas cortical area and thickness remained unchanged (data not shown).
Cancer-specific TRAF2 regulates osteotropic breast cancer – bone cell crosstalk
Breast cancer cells contribute to osteolysis through secretion of pro-inflammatory factors4. To explore the role of TRAF2 in this process, we took advantage of an in vivo supracalvarial injection and ex-vivo calvarial osteoblast organ models to assess osteolysis in response to MDA-231-BT conditioned medium in adult immuno-competent mice (unlike the MDA-231-BT nude mouse model described above) (Fig. 3A,D). Conditioned medium from MDA-231-BT cells overexpressing TRAF2 (MDA-231-BT-T2OE) induced osteolytic bone damage in calvarial bone in vivo (Fig. 3B,C) and ex vivo (Fig. 3E,F) that is characterized by significant loss in bone volume (p < 0.01). Histomorphometric analysis of the calvarial bone from the organ culture showed that conditioned medium from TRAF2 overexpressing cells increased osteoclast number (Fig. 3G, left panel) without affecting the number of osteoblasts (Fig. 3G, right panel). Next, we employed a quantitative proteomic approach to identify the tumour-derived factor(s) responsible. Analysis of protein level of human cytokines and chemokines in conditioned medium revealed that TRAF2 overexpression in the osteotropic MDA-231-BT-T2OE is associated with upregulation of a total of 48 secreted proteins in the conditioned medium (Fig. 3G). The identified proteins are common tumour-derived factors that have previously been found to be involved in the regulation of inflammation, angiogenesis, innate immunity and tumorigenesis (Fig. 3G and Table S1). Further evaluation of the role of these proteins in breast cancer, osteoclastogenesis and/or osteoblast differentiation revealed a subset of 21 proteins that are likely to be implicated in the regulation of the TRAF2-driven breast cancer-induced osteoclast and osteoblast changes that we have observed in our models (Fig. 3H and Table S2).
Cancer-specific TRAF2 regulates osteoblast and osteoclast changes associated with breast cancer
Previous studies have shown that TRAF2 expression in bone cells plays an important role in osteoclast differentiation and osteoblast apoptosis. Here, we carried out in vitro functional studies to examine the effects of knockdown and overexpression of cancer-specific TRAF2 on osteoclast and osteoblast changes associated with breast cancer. These experiments showed that TRAF2 overexpression significantly increased the ability of osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells (Fig. 4A) and their conditioned medium (20% v/v, Fig. 4B) to enhance RANKL-induced osteoclast formation in bone marrow cultures, whereas TRAF2 knockdown in these cells was inhibitory (Fig. 4A–C). Exposure of mouse primary osteoblasts and the human osteoblast-like cells Saos-2 cells to conditioned medium from the osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells overexpressing TRAF2 for 2 (mouse osteoblasts) or 12 (human Saos-2) days had no effect on osteoblast differentiation (Fig. 4D) or growth (Fig. 4E) in vitro. However, a modest yet significant reduction in bone nodule formation was detected in human Saos-2 cultures after 12 days of continuous exposure to conditioned medium from the osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells overexpressing TRAF2 when compared to control (Fig. 4F,G).
TRAF2 regulates the behaviour of osteotropic breast cancer cells by engaging IKKβ and IKKε
Previous studies have shown that TRAF2-driven NFκB activation in breast cancer cells is primarily mediated by the expression and kinase activity of IKKβ and IKKε3,6,7,29. In view of this, we knocked down IKKβ and IKKε in the osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells overexpressing TRAF2 (Fig. S2) and we investigated the effects of these changes on these cells metastatic and osteolytic behaviour in vitro. As shown in Fig. 5, knockdown of IKKβ or IKKε in TRAF2 overexpressing osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells significantly inhibited cell migration (Fig. 5A and C) and reduced the ability of these cells to enhance RANKL-induced osteoclast formation in bone marrow cultures (Fig. 5D–F). Knockdown of IKKβ or IKKε expression had no effect on the growth of MDA-231-BT cells overexpressing TRAF2 (Fig. 5B).
Discussion
TRAF2 has diverse functions in inflammation3,29,30, and its upregulation in mammary epithelial cells enhances their oncogenic transformation and promotes tumour growth7. In addition, TRAF2, through its interaction with NFκB, is implicated in the regulation of bone cell differentiation and bone remodelling2,4,25–27,31–33. Nonetheless, the contribution of TRAF2 to bone metastasis, skeletal tumour growth and osteolysis associated with advanced breast cancer has not been investigated. Our present in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro investigation showed that TRAF2 overexpression in parental and osteotropic sub-clones of MDA-231 human breast cancer cells increased tumour cell growth and motility, whereas its knockdown is inhibitory. TRAF2 overexpression also enhanced the ability of osteotropic breast cancer cells and their derived factors to induce osteoclast formation, inhibit osteoblast differentiation and to cause osteolysis by a mechanism that depends at least in part on NFκB activation.
Malignant breast cancer cells accumulate oncogenic alterations that significantly affect their growth in the primary site and metastatic activity at distant sites such as bone34,35. The majority of studies thus far implicate the TRAF2/NFκB pathway in these processes were limited to the role of TRAF2 in mammary tumour growth6,10,12,17,19,21–23. Here, and in broad agreement with these reports, we have found that TRAF2 overexpression promoted both mammary and skeletal tumour growth in mice after orthotopic and intra-tibial injections. NFκB signalling in breast cancer cells facilitates tumour growth and spread through induction of inflammatory mediators36. In vitro examination of the metastatic behavior of parental and osteotropic cells confirmed that TRAF2 overexpression is linked to increased tumour cell motility and invasion, whereas knockdown of TRAF2 was inhibitory. Examination of the levels of secreted proteins in conditioned medium from these cultures revealed that TRAF2 overexpression in osteotropic cells is associated with elevated levels of various pro-tumour and pro-migratory factors including uPAR, VEGF, IL-1, TSP-1 and Serpine 1, each with functions that enable primary and metastatic breast cancer cells to spread (Table S1).
Bone metastasis in advanced breast cancer is predominantly osteolytic37. Malignant breast cancer cells in bone acquire new characteristics influenced by matrix-derived factors24,37–40. In the present study, we provide evidence to support the notion that cancer-specific TRAF2 contributes to breast cancer cell behavior in bone. The evidence for this comes from the experiments that showed that (A) TRAF2 is highly expressed in the osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells when compared to parental control, (B) knockdown of TRAF2 in osteotropic MDA-231-BT inhibited cell migration and reduced the ability of these cells to enhance osteoclastogenesis, (C) conditioned medium from osteotropic MDA-231-BT overexpressing TRAF2 reduced osteoblast ability to form bone nodules in vitro, and (D) upregulation of TRAF2 worsened breast cancer-induced osteolysis. Microarray analysis of secreted proteins in conditioned medium from osteotropic MDA-231-BT overexpressing TRAF2 indicates that these effects were likely due to increase in the level of tumour-derived NFκB-mediated osteolytic factors, such as TNFα, IL-1, granulate macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), M-CSF, CD40L, IL-17, IL-11, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Table S1). TRAF2 overexpression also enhanced the level of tumour-derived TNFα, a known an inhibitory factor of osteoblast survival and differentiation4,25,33. Thus, it is reasonable to speculate that TRAF2 in osteotropic breast cancer cells orchestrates the expression of a set of tumour-derived factors that function cooperatively to alter the balance between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Nevertheless, it is important to note that we cannot exclude the role of well-established systemic and bone-derived osteolytic mediators such as RANKL, insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) in TRAF2-induced osteolysis in our models.
A number of studies have shown that TRAF2 oncogenic activity in parental breast cancer cells is driven by IKKβ and IKKε3,6,7,29,41. In the skeleton, selective inhibition of IKKε or IKKβ have been found to inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption28,42–44 and promote bone formation45,46. Here, we provided further evidence that IKKβ and IKKε are also implicated in TRAF2-driven metastatic and osteolytic behavior of the osteotropic MDA-231-BT cells. To this end, we showed that selective silencing of either IKKβ or IKKε reduced the ability of TRAF2 overexpressing MDA-231-BT cells to migrate and to enhance RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. Altogether, these results demonstrate that TRAF2 contributes to breast cancer related osteolysis through its regulation of both the canonical and non-canonical NFκB signalling pathway.
In conclusion, our studies showed that the TRAF2/IKK/NFκB axis in osteotropic breast cancer cells contributes to breast cancer associated osteolytic bone damage. We also confirmed that cancer-specific expression of TRAF2 regulates mammary tumour growth and showed for the first time that TRAF2 is implicated in skeletal tumour burden. When combined with previous studies that demonstrated that TRAF2 plays an important role in breast cancer initiation3,6,7,29, our present findings indicate that targeting of TRAF2 may have a potential therapeutic value in halting breast cancer metastasis and protecting the skeleton from the osteolysis associated with advanced breast cancer.
Methods
Materials and reagents
The parental human MDA-MB-231 (MDA-231) as representative of triple-negative breast cancer cells and human osteoblast-like cells Saos-2 were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA). The osteotropic MDA-231-BT1 was generated by repeated passages in vivo and validated for their ability to colonize bone and to cause osteolysis47. Tissue culture medium (DMEM and alpha-MEM) was obtained Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK). All primary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signalling Biotechnology (MA, USA) except rabbit anti-actin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK). Mouse macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) was obtained from R&D Systems (Abingdon, UK) and receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL) was a gift from Patrick Mollat (Galapagos SASU, France).
Generation of stable cell lines
TRAF2 was overexpressed in human parental MDA-231 and osteotropic MDA-231-BT breast cancer cells using the retroviral gene delivery system. The TRAF2 constructs used were a gift from the Wilkinson Lab at the Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre (University of Edinburgh). The Gateway donor vector TRAF2 from pDONR223 was recombined into Gateway destination vector MSCV-N-Flag-HA-IRES-PURO by LTR recombination (Behrends et al., 2010). MSCV-N-Flag-HA-IRES-PURO vector alone (Empty vector-MOCK) was used as the control. EGFP-MSCV-N-Flag-HA-IRES-PURO construct (EGFP) was used as a control to determine the transfection efficiency. HEK293ET cells were exposed to transfection mixture (5 μg of vector DNA, 5 μg of gag and pol, 5 μg of pMD2.G, 40 μl of Polyethylenimine (PEI) transfection reagent and 450 μl of standard DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS). MDA-231 and MDA-231-BT cells were infected using an infection mixture containing 14 μl of Polybrene transfection reagent, 5 ml of harvested virus and 9 ml of medium was prepared and filtered (Percentage of virus 5/14*100 = 35.7%). EGFP construct transfected cells were used to estimate the transfection efficiency.
Small RNA interference
Parental and osteotropic MDA-231 cells were transfected with siRNA (25 nM) using Dharmafect 1 reagent (Dharmacon, CO, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Small interfering RNAs (siRNA; siGenome SMART pool) as a pool of four annealed double-stranded RNA oligonucleotides for IKKβ (M-003503-03), IKKε (M-003723-02), TRAF2 (M-005198-00-0005), and non-targeting control no. 3 (D-001210-03-05) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For transfections involving the combination of TRAF2 and IKKβ oligonucleotide, each oligonucleotide was transfected at a concentration of 50 nM, so the total siRNA concentration is 100 nM. The cells were cultured for 48 hours in antibiotic free complete medium with the transfection reagent. The efficiency of TRAF2, IKKε and IKKβ knockdown and overexpression was assessed by Western blot analysis.
Animal experiments
All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee at the University of Edinburgh (Scotland, United Kingdom) and L’Aquila (Italy) and were conducted in accordance with the United Kingdom Home Office regulations.
Intra-tibial injection in mice
The effect of TRAF2 overexpression on skeletal tumour growth and local osteolysis was studied by intra-tibial injection of osteotropic MDA-MB-231 (MDA-231-BT) breast cancer cell-line in 4-week-old female Balb/c nu/nu mice. Briefly, mice were divided into two groups and received intra-tibial injection of human breast cancer cells mock (MDA-231-BT mock) or cells overexpressing TRAF2 (MDA-231-BT-T2OE) (5 × 104 cells) in the left leg or a sham injection of Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) into the right leg. Animals were euthanized 14 days post injection and bones were analyzed by micro–computed tomography (microCT, Skyscan 1172 scanner)48. Skeletal tumor growth was measured on 2D microCT images using Brucker ctAN and Image J (1.34 s; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) and results were expressed as a percentage of total metaphyseal area.
Supracalvarial injection in mice
The effects of TRAF2 overexpression on breast cancer-induced osteolysis was studied by supracalvarial injection of conditioned medium in immuno-competent 3-week-old C57Bl/6 female mice. Mice were injected subcutaneously over the calvarial bones with conditioned medium (50μL) from human mock (MDA-231-BT mock) or cells overexpressing TRAF2 (MDA-231-BT-T2OE) breast cancer cells on 5 consecutive days. The calvarial bone was assessed using microCT at a resolution of 8μm48.
Bone organ culture system
Ex vivo osteolysis was studied in mouse calvarial bone using an adaptation of the mouse calvarial organ culture49. Mouse calvarias were isolated from 7-day-old mice, divided into equal halves and cultured on stainless steel rafts in MDA-BT-mock or MDA-BT-T2OE conditioned medium (20% v/v). Tissue culture medium was refreshed every 48 hours and the cultures were terminated after 7 days. Bone volume was assessed by microCT (resolution, 5μm) as previously described48. Bone histomorphometry was performed on the calvarial bone and Hematoxilin and Eosin staining was used to evaluate osteoclasts and toluidine blue staining for osteoblasts. Histological sections were analysed using software based on the Aphelion Image Analysis tool kit (Adcis, He0rouville- Saint-Clair, France).
Osteoblast cultures
Primary osteoblasts were isolated from the calvarial bones of 2-day-old mice50. Primary calvarial osteoblasts (15 × 103 cells/well) and the osteoblast-like cells Saos-2 (10 × 105 cells/well) were cultured in standard alpha-MEM or DMEM respectively, supplemented β-glycerol phosphate (10 μM) and L-ascorbic acid (50 µg/ml) for 2 (osteoblast differentiation), 12 (bone nodule, Saos-2) or 21 (bone nodule, calvarial osteoblasts) days. Osteoblast cell number, differentiation and bone nodule formation were determined by AlamarBlue assay, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay and alizarin red (ALZ) staining50.
Osteoclast cultures
Osteoclast formation was studied in RANKL and M-CSF stimulated bone marrow cultures. Bone marrow (BM) cells were obtained from the marrow of 3-month-old mice and M-CSF-dependent osteoclast precursor cells generated as previously described51. M-CSF-dependent osteoclast precursors were plated into 96 well plates (15 × 103 cells/well) in alpha-MEM supplemented with M-CSF (25 ng/ml) and RANKL (100 ng/ml) for 6 hours prior addition of MDA-231 breast cancer cells (300 cells/well) or their conditioned medium (20% v/v). Cultures were stained for Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAcP)50.
Western Blotting
Western blot analysis was used to detect protein expression in breast cancer cells. Cells were lysed in a standard buffer (0.1% (w/v) Sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 1 μM Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 2% (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail, 10 µM of sodium fluoride and 2% (v/v) phosphatase inhibitor cocktail). Protein concentration was determined using BCA assay (Pierce, USA). Total protein lysate (60μg) was resolved by SDS-PAGE (BioRAD, United Kingdom), immunoblotted with antibodies according to manufacturer’s instructions, detected using rabbit monoclonal antibodies (all at 1:1000 dilution, cell Signalling Technology, USA) and immuno-complexes were visualised by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham, UK) on a Syngene GeneGnome imaging system. The intensity of the bands was quantified using GeneSnap software (Syngene, UK) and level of actin was used for normalization.
Measurement of levels of tumour-derived factors
Level of tumour-derived factors in conditioned medium from human MDA-231 breast cancer cells was determined by Proteome Profiler Human XL Cytokine Array Kit (ARY022, R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
Comparison between groups was done by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test (SPSS for Windows, version 11). A p-value value of 0.05 or below was considered statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from Breast Cancer Now, Darwin Endowment Fund and Cancer Research UK to Aymen I. Idris.
Author Contributions
P.P., S.M., R.T.B. and D.d.R. are involved in experimental and analysis, A.K.; I.B., M.C. and N.R. are involved in experimental; A.I.I. is involved in conception, experimental, analysis, editing and writing.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-18327-5.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Chung JY, Park YC, Ye H, Wu H. All TRAFs are not created equal: common and distinct molecular mechanisms of TRAF-mediated signal transduction. J.Cell Sci. 2002;115:679–688. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.4.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kanazawa K, Kudo A. TRAF2 is essential for TNF-alpha-induced osteoclastogenesis. J Bone Miner.Res. 2005;20:840–847. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang Y, Zhang P, Liu Y, Cheng G. TRAF-mediated regulation of immune and inflammatory responses. Sci China Life Sci. 2010;53:159–168. doi: 10.1007/s11427-010-0050-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nanes MS. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha: molecular and cellular mechanisms in skeletal pathology. Gene. 2003;321:1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00841-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Au PY, Yeh WC. Physiological roles and mechanisms of signaling by TRAF2 and TRAF5. Adv.Exp.Med.Biol. 2007;597:32–47. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-70630-6_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shen RR, et al. IkappaB kinase epsilon phosphorylates TRAF2 to promote mammary epithelial cell transformation. Mol.Cell Biol. 2012;32:4756–4768. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00468-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shen RR, et al. TRAF2 is an NF-kappaB-activating oncogene in epithelial cancers. Oncogene. 2015;34:209–216. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhao ZJ, et al. Expression, correlation, and prognostic value of TRAF2 and TRAF4 expression in malignant plural effusion cells in human breast cancer. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015;43:897–903. doi: 10.1002/dc.23330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rothe M, Sarma V, Dixit VM, Goeddel DV. TRAF2-mediated activation of NF-kappa B by TNFreceptor 2 and CD40. Science. 1995;269:1424–1427. doi: 10.1126/science.7544915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jang KW, et al. Ubiquitin ligase CHIP induces TRAF2 proteasomal degradation and NF-kappaB inactivation to regulate breast cancer cell invasion. J.Cell Biochem. 2011;112:3612–3620. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou AY, et al. IKKepsilon-mediated tumorigenesis requires K63-linked polyubiquitination by a cIAP1/cIAP2/TRAF2 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Cell Rep. 2013;3:724–733. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Taminiau A, et al. HOXA1 binds RBCK1/HOIL-1 and TRAF2 and modulates the TNF/NF-kappaB pathway in a transcription-independent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:7331–7349. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chung JY, Lu M, Yin Q, Wu H. Structural revelations of TRAF2 function in TNF receptor signaling pathway. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2007;597:93–113. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-70630-6_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Darnay BG, Haridas V, Ni J, Moore PA, Aggarwal BB. Characterization of the intracellular domain of receptor activator of NF-kappaB (RANK). Interaction with tumor necrosis factor receptor- associated factors and activation of NF-kappab and c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273:20551–20555. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.32.20551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu X, et al. Ubiquitination of inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) by the E3 ligase CHIP mediates the IRE1/TRAF2/JNK pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2014;289:30567–30577. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.562868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang L, Blackwell K, Altaeva A, Shi Z, Habelhah H. TRAF2 phosphorylation promotes NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression and inhibits oxidative stress-induced cell death. Molecular biology of the cell. 2011;22:128–140. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-06-0556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou AY, et al. IKKepsilon-mediated tumorigenesis requires K63-linked polyubiquitination by a cIAP1/cIAP2/TRAF2 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Cell reports. 2013;3:724–733. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li S, Wang L, Dorf ME. PKC phosphorylation of TRAF2 mediates IKKalpha/beta recruitment and K63-linked polyubiquitination. Mol Cell. 2009;33:30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang X, et al. TRAF2 regulates the cytoplasmic/nuclear distribution of TRAF4 and its biological function in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;436:344–348. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.05.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bertucci F, et al. Gene expression profiling shows medullary breast cancer is a subgroup of basal breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4636–4644. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tanic M, Zajac M, Gomez-Lopez G, Benitez J, Martinez-Delgado B. Integration of BRCA1-mediated miRNA and mRNA profiles reveals microRNA regulation of TRAF2 and NFkappaB pathway. Breast Cancer Res.Treat. 2012;134:41–51. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1905-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Benetatos CA, et al. Birinapant (TL32711), a bivalent SMAC mimetic, targets TRAF2-associated cIAPs, abrogates TNF-induced NF-kappaB activation, and is active in patient-derived xenograft models. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2014;13:867–879. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sun LL, et al. Suppressive role of miR-502-5p in breast cancer via downregulation of TRAF2. Oncol Rep. 2014;31:2085–2092. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Roodman GD. Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N.Engl.J.Med. 2004;350:1655–1664. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra030831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gilbert L, et al. Inhibition of osteoblast differentiation by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Endocrinology. 2000;141:3956–3964. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.11.7739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kobayashi K, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha stimulates osteoclast differentiation by a mechanism independent of the ODF/RANKL-RANK interaction. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2000;191:275–286. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shimada K, Ikeda K, Ito K. Traf2 interacts with Smad4 and regulates BMP signaling pathway in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun. 2009;390:775–779. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang Y, et al. Amlexanox Suppresses Osteoclastogenesis and Prevents Ovariectomy-Induced Bone Loss. Scientific reports. 2015;5:13575. doi: 10.1038/srep13575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bradley JR, Pober JS. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs) Oncogene. 2001;20:6482–6491. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chiosi E, et al. Change in TNF-alpha receptor expression is a relevant event in doxorubicin-induced H9c2 cardiomyocyte cell death. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2007;27:589–597. doi: 10.1089/jir.2006.0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang YH, Heulsmann A, Tondravi MM, Mukherjee A, Abu-Amer Y. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) stimulates RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis via coupling of TNF type 1 receptor and RANK signaling pathways. J.Biol.Chem. 2001;276:563–568. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008198200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wong BR, et al. The TRAF family of signal transducers mediates NF-kappaB activation by the TRANCE receptor. J.Biol.Chem. 1998;273:28355–28359. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.43.28355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tsuboi M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta increase the Fas- mediated apoptosis of human osteoblasts. J.Lab Clin.Med. 1999;134:222–231. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2143(99)90201-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kang Y, et al. A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:537–549. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00132-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Blanco MA, et al. Global secretome analysis identifies novel mediators of bone metastasis. Cell Res. 2012;22:1339–1355. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Clement JF, Meloche S, Servant MJ. The IKK-related kinases: from innate immunity to oncogenesis. Cell Res. 2008;18:889–899. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat.Rev.Cancer. 2002;2:584–593. doi: 10.1038/nrc867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yoneda T, Hiraga T. Crosstalk between cancer cells and bone microenvironment in bone metastasis. Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun. 2005;328:679–687. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Siclari VA, Guise TA, Chirgwin JM. Molecular interactions between breast cancer cells and the bone microenvironment drive skeletal metastases. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25:621–633. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-9023-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang XH, et al. Selection of bone metastasis seeds by mesenchymal signals in the primary tumor stroma. Cell. 2013;154:1060–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Oida K, et al. Nuclear factor-kB plays a critical role in both intrinsic and acquired resistance against endocrine therapy in human breast cancer cells. Scientific reports. 2014;4:4057. doi: 10.1038/srep04057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ruocco MG, et al. I{kappa}B kinase (IKK){beta}, but not IKK{alpha}, is a critical mediator of osteoclast survival and is required for inflammation-induced bone loss. J Exp.Med. 2005;201:1677–1687. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Idris AI, et al. Pharmacologic inhibitors of IkappaB kinase suppress growth and migration of mammary carcinosarcoma cells in vitro and prevent osteolytic bone metastasis in vivo. Mol.Cancer Ther. 2009;8:2339–2347. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Otero JE, Dai S, Alhawagri MA, Darwech I, Abu-Amer Y. IKKbeta activation is sufficient for RANK-independent osteoclast differentiation and osteolysis. J.Bone Miner.Res. 2010;25:1282–1294. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chang J, et al. Inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation by nuclear factor-kappaB. Nat.Med. 2009;15:682–689. doi: 10.1038/nm.1954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Alles N, et al. Suppression of NF-kappaB increases bone formation and ameliorates osteopenia in ovariectomized mice. Endocrinology. 2010;151:4626–4634. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rucci N, et al. Proline/arginine-rich end leucine-rich repeat protein N-terminus is a novel osteoclast antagonist that counteracts bone loss. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2013;28:1912–1924. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Campbell GM, Sophocleous A. Quantitative analysis of bone and soft tissue by micro-computed tomography: applications to ex vivo and in vivo studies. BoneKEy reports. 2014;3:564. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2014.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Logan JG, et al. Selective tyrosine kinase inhibition of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibits human and mouse breast cancer-induced bone cell activity, bone remodeling, and osteolysis. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2013;28:1229–1242. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Taylor SE, Shah M, Orriss IR. Generation of rodent and human osteoblasts. BoneKEy reports. 2014;3:585. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2014.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Marino S, Logan JG, Mellis D, Capulli M. Generation and culture of osteoclasts. BoneKEy reports. 2014;3:570. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2014.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.