Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2017 Dec 8;200(2):657–668. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700810

Innate Sex Bias of Staphylococcus aureus Skin Infection is Driven by alpha-Hemolysin

Moriah J Castleman 1,+, Srijana Pokhrel 1,+, Kathleen D Triplett 1, Donna F Kusewitt 2, Bradley O Elmore 1, Jason A Joyner 1, Jon K Femling 3, Geetanjali Sharma 4, Helen J Hathaway 5, Eric R Prossnitz 4, Pamela R Hall 1,*
PMCID: PMC5760295  NIHMSID: NIHMS921095  PMID: 29222165

Abstract

Numerous studies have reported sex bias in infectious diseases, with bias direction dependent on pathogen and site of infection. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), yet sex bias in susceptibility to S. aureus SSTI has not been described. A search of electronic health records revealed an odds ratio of 2.4 for S. aureus SSTI in males versus females. To investigate the physiological basis of this bias, we compared outcomes between male and female mice in a model of S. aureus dermonecrosis. Consistent with the epidemiological data, female mice were better protected against SSTI, with reduced dermonecrosis followed later by increased bacterial clearance. Protection in females was disrupted by ovariectomy and restored by short-term estrogen administration. Importantly, this sex-bias was mediated by a sex-specific response to the S. aureus-secreted virulence factor, alpha-hemolysin (Hla). Infection with wild-type S. aureus suppressed inflammatory cytokine production in the skin of female, but not male, mice when compared to infection with an isogenic hla deletion mutant. This differential response was conserved following injection with Hla alone, demonstrating a direct response to Hla independent of bacterial burden. Additionally, neutrophils, essential for clearing S. aureus, demonstrated sex-specific S. aureus bactericidal capacity ex vivo. This work suggests that sex-specific skin innate responsiveness to Hla and neutrophil bactericidal capacity play important roles in limiting S. aureus SSTI in females. Understanding the molecular mechanisms controlling this sex bias may reveal novel targets to promote host innate defense against S. aureus skin infection.

INTRODUCTION

Sex steroid hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone, can differentially modulate host immune responses (13), yet the impact of sex and the associated steroid hormones on mechanisms of disease susceptibility has historically been understudied (4, 5). This is especially true for skin-related research (6). Skin is the body’s largest organ and serves as the first line of defense against exogenous insult (7, 8). Although women have a greater incidence of dermatological disorders (6), they also demonstrate accelerated wound healing compared to men (912). Yet despite these differences, very few studies have directly addressed sex-dependent effects on skin disease (6).

Between 2000 and 2012, the incidence of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in the USA is reported to have increased 40% with treatment expenditures increasing from $4.4 billion to $13.8 billion (in 2012 dollars) (13). Although males are often considered to be at increased risk of infection, innate sex bias in infection susceptibility and severity varies by pathogen and site of infection (14, 15). The dominant cause of SSTIs is Staphylococcus aureus (1618), and in the United States, more than half of these infections are caused by methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA) (16, 17). Invasive S. aureus SSTI is mediated in large part by alpha-hemolysin (Hla), a secreted pore-forming toxin that is a major virulence factor causing dermonecrosis and inflammation (1922). However, despite the prevalence of S. aureus in SSTI and the contribution of Hla to pathogenesis, sex bias in innate susceptibility to S. aureus SSTI or Hla has not been reported.

Given the significant impact of SSTIs on human health, identifying and understanding sex-dependent differences in susceptibility to S. aureus skin infections could lead to novel treatment options. A recent literature review revealed that, compared to females, males are more often carriers of S. aureus, which may predispose them to infection (23), and males are at increased risk of S. aureus bacteremia (14, 23). Given the superior wound healing capacity of females compared to males (9, 10, 12), the protection afforded by estrogen in other models of Gram-positive infection (24, 25) and the contribution of Hla to pathogenesis (1922), we investigated whether female sex provides innate resistance to S. aureus SSTI in an Hla-dependent manner.

Here, we used a mouse model of S. aureus SSTI (20) to demonstrate that female sex, via the sex hormone estrogen, provides innate resistance to S. aureus SSTI – supporting a physiological component behind the epidemiological data showing a greater than two-fold higher incidence of S. aureus SSTI in male versus female patients. Specifically, female mice had an estrogen-dependent reduction in dermonecrosis and local inflammatory cytokine levels compared to males, followed days later by significant reductions in bacterial burden. Importantly, this bias was largely driven by a sex-specific response to Hla. Inflammatory cytokine production at the site of S. aureus infection increased in females infected with an isogenic hla deletion strain (LACΔhla) compared to infection with wild-type S. aureus (LAC), consistent with previous studies using female mice (26). However, when comparing the sexes, the opposite was observed in infected male mice, with either no change or with a trend toward reduced inflammatory cytokine levels in the absence of Hla. These differences were conserved following injection of Hla alone, demonstrating independence from bacterial burden. In addition, in ex vivo studies, neutrophils from female mice demonstrated increased S. aureus bactericidal capacity compared to neutrophils from male mice. Given that neutrophils are essential for clearing S. aureus infections (27), this work suggests that sex-specific differences in both skin innate responsiveness to Hla and neutrophil bactericidal capacity play important roles in limiting S. aureus SSTI in females.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electric Health Records (EHR) query parameters

Incidence of S. aureus SSTI in male versus female patients was evaluated by searching the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Clinical and Translational Science Center (CTSC) Health Facts® database. The database is comprised of de-identified electronic health records (EHR) from more than 600 participating CERNER hospitals (UL1TR001449 NIH CTSA at UNM). We queried the database for patients of reproductive age (postpubescent to premenopausal; 18–45 yo) receiving treatment for uncomplicated SSTI between 2011 and 2014. Based on previous studies (28, 29), SSTIs were defined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) (30) diagnosis codes 680.x (carbuncle and furuncle) and 681.x-682.x (cellulitis and abscess). SSTIs codes were matched with same encounter ICD-9 codes for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) (41.11) or MRSA (41.12). Population statistics are based on the number of 18–45 yo (males or females) included in the database during the same time frame.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

S. aureus USA300 LAC and the LAC hla deletion mutant (LACΔhla) were provided by Dr. F. DeLeo (Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institutes of Health,/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, MT) and Dr. J. Bubeck-Wardenburg (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL), respectively. Bacteria were cultured at 37°C in trypticase soy broth (TSB) to early exponential phase as described previously (31). CFUs were determined by plating serial dilutions on sheep blood agar (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and stocks maintained at −80°C in TSB with 10 % glycerol.

Mouse model of dermonecrosis

Animal work protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (UNM HSC) and carried out in the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-accredited UNM HSC Animal Research Facility. All animal work was performed in strict accordance with recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (32) and the US Animal Welfare Act (33). C57BL/6J and BALB/c mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were acclimated for a minimum of seven days prior to use. Ovariectomized C57BL/6J mice and sham surgery controls were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. These mice were allowed to recover over several weeks (≥ 10 as previously described (25, 34)) prior to exogenous administration of vehicle or 17β-estradiol (E2).

The mouse model of dermonecrosis was performed according to previously published protocol (20), with no attempt to target a specific phase of the estrous cycle. Twenty-four hours before infection, 8–12 week-old male and female mice were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation, and Nair™ (Church and Dwight, Ewing, NJ) used to remove hair from the right flank. On the day of infection, early exponential-phase S. aureus at the indicated inoculum was delivered in 50 µl of USP-grade saline (Braun, Irvine, CA) by subcutaneous injection into the right flank. Mice were weighed prior to infection and daily thereafter. Injection sites were photographed daily and area of dermonecrosis determined by ImageJ analysis (35). At the time of sacrifice, mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and skin surrounding the injection site (2.25-cm2) excised and homogenized prior to serial dilution and plating on sheep blood agar for CFU determination. Homogenate was centrifuged at 12,500 × g for 10 min and supernatant (clarified homogenate) stored at −80°C for later cytokine analysis. Stock solutions of 17β-estradiol (E2) (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO) were prepared in ethanol then diluted 10-fold in 0.9% NaCl, 0.1% BSA, 0.01% Tween 20 for injection. Where indicated, mice received intraperitoneal injections of 10 µg/kg E2 or vehicle control on day −2 through day +2 relative to infection. Recombinant Hla for dermonecrosis studies was prepared as previously described (36), and 1 µg of purified Hla in 50 µl USP-grade saline was injected subcutaneously into the right flank as indicated.

Cytokine and myeloperoxidase quantification from tissue homogenate

Cytokines and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were measured in clarified supernatant from homogenized skin prepared as described above. Cytokines levels were determined using a custom designed multiplex assay (Millipore, Billerica, MA), and MPO levels measured using the ELISA Mouse Myeloperoxidase DuoSet kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), each according to manufacturer’s directions. For cytokine levels below the limit of detection, one-half of the lowest standard concentration was utilized.

Histology

For histologic examination, skin samples were collected on day 3 post-infection or Hla-injection and a total of 6 lesions were evaluated for each sex and treatment group. Briefly, a 1-cm2 sample of skin containing a lesion or an inoculation site was flattened on thin cardboard, fixed 24–48 hours in neutral buffered formalin, then stored in 70% ethanol. The skin sample was bisected through the center of the lesion or site of inoculation and processed routinely for embedding in paraffin, sectioning at 5 µm thickness, and staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). H&E-stained slides were scanned by an Aperio CS2 scanner (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) and morphometry was performed using the HALO image analysis platform (Indica Labs, Albuquerque, NM) to determine the length of necrotic epidermis and the area of dermal necrosis in each lesion. Because the necrotic material in abscesses adhered poorly to slides and was often lost during tissue processing, quantification of abscess size is not included.

Quantitative RT-PCR to measure inflammasome gene expression

Infection site tissue (2.25-cm2) was collected in RNALater (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA was isolated and purified using Qiazol and RNeasy Kits (Qiagen), respectively, according to manufacturer’s directions. High-capacity cDNA RT kits with RNAse inhibitor, random hexamer primers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and a PTC-200 Peltier thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) were used to generate cDNA. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed on a ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) using Taqman® Gene Expression master mix (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression was quantified using QuantStudio software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) relative to hprt using Prime Time Predesigned qPCR assays for nlrp3, asc, casp1 or il-1b (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA).

Western blot analysis of caspase-1 and IL-1β

Frozen clarified abscess homogenates were thawed rapidly at 37°C and protein concentration measured by A280 (Nanodrop 1000 Spectrophotometer; ThermoFisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE). Equal amounts of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 4–12% Bis-Tris BOLT gel in MES-SDS running buffer (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), prior to transfer to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 3% non-fat milk (NFM) in TBS (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5 and 150 mM NaCl) for 1.5 h at 22°C, then probed overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-mouse anti-pro Caspase 1 + p10 + p12 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) or rabbit anti-mouse IL-1β (Abcam) in TBS plus 1% NFM. After washing with TBST (TBS with 0.1% Tween 20), membranes were developed using SuperSignal™ Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific) following incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG poly-horseradish peroxide–conjugated secondary antibody (ThermoFisher Scientific). Imaging was performed using a Protein Simple FluorChem R imaging system (Protein Simple, Santa Clara, CA) and band intensity determined using Image Studio Lite software ( LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE) relative to total protein loaded based on SYPRO® Ruby staining (Lonza, Allendale, NJ).

Mouse bone-marrow neutrophil ex vivo killing of S. aureus

The indicated S. aureus isolates were prepared for ex vivo killing assays as follows: one day prior to the assay, 2 × 107 CFU/mL of S. aureus was cultured (37°C, 220 rpm) in TSB along with 50 nM autoinducing peptide 1 (AIP1) (Biopeptide Co., Inc, San Diego, CA) to stimulate quorum sensing. After 5 h, bacteria were washed twice with phenol red free HBSS (Gibco™, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) by centrifugation at 1800 × g at 4°C for 4 min. Bacteria were briefly vortexed and sonicated, suspended in HBSS to 6 × 106 CFU/mL and stored on ice at 4°C until use. On the day of the assay, bacteria were opsonized in 10 % autologous mouse serum for 20 min at 37 °C with gentle rotation (10 rpm). Bacteria were then plated for CFU determination.

On the day of the assay, bone marrow was collected by flushing mouse femurs and tibias with ice cold HBSS containing 2 mM EDTA using a 26-gauge needle. Red blood cells in bone marrow were lysed in 0.2 % sodium chloride, after which neutrophils were isolated by density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque® 1119 and 1077 (Sigma-Aldrich®). Isolated neutrophils were suspended in Assay buffer (phenol red free HBSS with calcium/ magnesium (Lonza, Walkersville, MD), 20 mM HEPES, 1 % charcoal stripped FBS (JR Scientific, Woodland, CA)) and primed with 100 ng/mL mouse TNFα (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) for 30 min at 37 °C with 5 % CO2.

To allow for phagocytosis, TNFα-primed neutrophils and opsonized S. aureus were combined at an MOI of 1 and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C with gentle end-over-end rotation. The mixture was then centrifuged at 200 × g (7 min) to remove non-phagocytosed bacteria, before resuspending the pellet in room temperature Assay buffer. A sample was sonicated in PBS containing 1 % Triton X-100 before serial dilution and plating on sheep blood agar to determine the number of bacteria phagocytosed (t0 CFUs). Percent phagocytosed bacteria was determined relative to the number of opsonized bacteria. The remaining sample was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with gentle end-over-end rotation, before serial dilution and plating for CFU determination (t60). Percent killing was calculated as follows based on CFUs at t0 and t60: (((t0–t60)/t0)*100).

S. aureus growth in the presence of E2

S. aureus USA300 LAC at 1 × 105 CFU/mL was grown overnight in TSB at 37°C with shaking in the presence of vehicle control or the indicated concentrations of E2. Growth was measured by optical density at 600 nm (OD600) recorded at 15-min increments using a Tecan Systems (San Jose, CA) Infinite M200 plate reader.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 7 software (Graph Pad Software, La Jolla, CA). Variance was determined by F-test and data analyzed as appropriate by Unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney test for non-parametric data. Necrosis data were analyzed by Unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction for unequal variance. Multiple comparison analyses were performed by ANOVA with post-hoc tests as indicated.

RESULTS

Female sex confers innate resistance to S. aureus skin infections

To gain insight into potential sex bias in the incidence of S. aureus SSTI in humans, we queried the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Clinical and Translational Science Center (CTSC) Health Facts® database of electronic health records (EHR) for patients of reproductive age (postpubescent to premenopausal; 18–45 yo) receiving treatment for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) or MRSA SSTI between 2011 and 2014. We found a significantly increased incidence of infection in males compared to females (Table 1), resulting in an odds ratio of greater than 2.3 for male infection. Given that these findings likely result from both behavioral and biological factors (1), we focused on the biological contribution of sex to S. aureus SSTI.

Table 1.

Sex Bias in incidence of S. aureus SSTI*

Sex SA SSTI
(MSSA/MRSA)
Population Incidence/
100,000
X2 Odds Ratio

Male 8263 11,611,077 71 p<0.0001 2.375 (95% CI 2.30–2.45)
(4022/4241)

Female 6580 21,957,204 30
(2864/3716)
*

Cerner Health Facts®, 18–45 yo, 2011–2014

Using an established mouse model of S. aureus SSTI (20), we compared outcomes in male and female mice on days 1 and 3 after subcutaneous infection with the well-characterized, highly-virulent, MRSA isolate USA300 LAC (37). While differences in dermonecrosis did not reach significance on day 1 post-infection, by day 3, near the peak of pathogenesis (38), female C57BL/6J mice showed significantly reduced dermonecrosis (>2.5-fold reduction) compared to males (Figure 1A–B). This effect was not restricted to C57BL/6J mice as infected female BALB/c mice also displayed reduced day 3 dermonecrosis versus males (>1.8-fold reduction) (Supplementary Figure S1 A–B). Histologically, the lesions in C57/BL6J males and females had a similar appearance, with a clearly delineated central region of epidermal necrosis overlying an area of dermal necrosis which extended into the panniculus carnosus. An intense inflammatory cell infiltrate, consisting predominantly of neutrophils, occupied the dermis adjacent to the central area of epidermal and dermal necrosis. An abscess consisting of degenerate neutrophils filled the subcutis at the base of the lesion (Figure 1C). Although similar in character, lesions in male and female mice varied significantly in extent, with males having greater lengths of epidermal necrosis (9.57±0.98 vs 6.35±0.75, p=0.0277) and greater areas of dermal necrosis (1.49±0.57 vs 0.74±0.36 mm2, p=0.0238) than females.

Figure 1. Female mice are resistant to S. aureus skin infection compared to males.

Figure 1

C57BL/6J mice were infected subcutaneously with 2 × 107 USA300 LAC. (A) Representative images of infection sites (bar=5 mm) and (B) area of dermonecrosis on days 1 and 3 post-infection (n=12 mice per group from three independent experiments). (C) Histologic appearance of normal skin and infection site lesions on day 3 post-infection (top, uninfected; bottom, infected). Arrowheads mark the junction between viable and necrotic epidermis and asterisks indicate areas of dermal necrosis; areas of abscessation are identified by A. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. (D) Bacterial burden (colony forming units, CFU) at the site of infection and (E) percent weight change on days 1 and 3 post-infection. (F) Day 1 and Day 3 inflammatory cytokine levels in clarified infection site homogenate. Day 1, n=4 mice per group; Day 3, n=6–8 mice per group from two independent experiments. Histology only, n=6 mice per group. Data are mean ± SEM. Mann-Whitney test; ns, not significant; *p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.

Differences in dermonecrosis between the sexes appeared to be largely independent of bacterial burden at the site of infection, which differed only slightly, but significantly, on day 1 between C57BL/6J males and females (log CFUs of 8.9 and 8.6, respectively) (Figure 1D) and on day 3 between male and female BALB/c mice (8.5 vs 8.2 log CFUs, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S1C). Similarly, weight loss, a measure of overall morbidity, was reduced on day 1, but not day 3, post-infection in female C57BL/6J mice versus male controls (Figure 1E, BALB/c shown in Supplementary Figure S1D). We next asked if there were differences between the sexes in the cytokine response at the site of infection. Although inflammatory cytokines can drive bacterial clearance (38, 39), inflammation at the site of S. aureus SSTI can also contribute to disease severity without improving bacterial clearance (40). Here, however, as might be expected from reduced dermonecrosis, on both days 1 and 3 post-infection female C57BL/6J mice displayed reduced levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β (2.6-fold, 2.9-fold, respectively), TNFα (2.0-fold, 2.9 fold), IL-6 (6.9-fold, 2.5-fold) and CXCL1 (3.1-fold, 3.1-fold) at the site of infection compared to males (Figure 1F). However, IL-10 levels did not significantly differ between the sexes at these time points, suggesting that the differential regulation is cytokine specific. A similar trend was observed for BALB/c mice (Supplementary Figure S1E). Together, these results demonstrate an innate sex bias in the severity of S. aureus SSTI, with female sex providing a protective benefit against pathogenesis and inflammation.

Hla contributes to sex bias in S. aureus SSTI

Sex-specific responses to S. aureus-secreted virulence factors such as Hla could account for the pronounced differences in dermonecrosis and inflammatory cytokine production in infected mice. To test this, we subcutaneously infected male and female C57BL/6J mice with wild-type S. aureus (LAC) or an isogenic hla deletion mutant (LACΔhla) (41). Due to the trend toward increased bacterial clearance in LAC-infected female versus male mice on day 3 post-infection (Figures 1D, Supplemental Figure 1C), we postulated there would be a significant difference in bacterial clearance later post-infection. We compared outcomes over the course of a 7-day infection (see Supplemental Figure S2 for data from days 1 and 3 post-infection with LACΔhla). By day 7 post-infection, female mice infected with LAC again showed significantly reduced dermonecrosis, but also significantly increased bacterial clearance, compared to infected males (Figure 2A–C). During LACΔhla infection, male mice showed small areas of dermonecrosis at the site of infection on day 7 (Figure 2A, B), suggesting that males may be more susceptible than females to S. aureus virulence factors other than Hla. Importantly, in contrast to LAC-infected mice, there was no significant difference in day 7 bacterial clearance between male and female C57BL/6J mice infected with LACΔhla (Figure 2C). These findings suggest that sex-specific differences in innate immune control of S. aureus infection are dependent on the ability of the pathogen to express Hla.

Figure 2. Male and female mice differentially respond to skin infection with S. aureus lacking Hla.

Figure 2

C57BL/6J mice were infected subcutaneously with 2–3 × 107 LAC or LACΔhla. (A) Representative images of infection sites (bar=5 mm), (B) dermonecrosis (ND= not detected) and (C) bacterial burden at the site of infection on day 7 post-infection. n=12 mice per group (LAC) and 7–10 mice per group (LACΔhla) from at least two independent experiments. Data are mean ± SEM. Mann-Whitney test. (D) Cytokine levels in infection site homogenate on day 7 post-infection (n=7–10 mice per group from two independent experiments). Data are mean ± SEM. ANOVA p values equal 0.0007 (IL-1β), 0.0008 (TNFα), 0.0006 (IL-6), 0.0003 (CXCL1) and 0.0404 (IL-10). Dunn’s Multiple Comparison test: ns, not significant; *, p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001.

Interactions between sex and Hla mediate the pro-inflammatory response during SSTI

In a previous study of S. aureus skin infection using female BALB/c mice, Hla was shown to suppress local inflammatory cytokine production and neutrophil influx (26). However, by comparing both sexes, our findings suggest that the local inflammatory response during S. aureus SSTI is not only dependent on Hla, but on the sex of the host as well. To test this, we compared inflammatory cytokine levels in the skin of male and female C57BL/6J mice on day 7 after infection with LAC or LACΔhla. As expected given the reduced dermonecrosis and bacterial burden compared to males (Figure 2A–C), female mice infected with LAC had lower local levels of IL-1β, TNFα, IL-6 and CXCL1 (Figure 2D). Interestingly, unlike earlier time points (Figure 1F), day 7 post-infection females also had reduced expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, suggesting that the sex differences in cytokine production are both time and cytokine specific. In contrast to LAC-infected mice, however, there was no difference in cytokine levels between male and female mice infected with LACΔhla. Consistent with findings in BALB/c females (26), local IL-1β, TNFα and CXCL1 levels were increased in S. aureus infected C57BL/6J female mice in the absence of Hla (Figure 2D). However, this was not the case with male mice, which showed a trend toward cytokine reduction in the absence of Hla, although this did not reach statistical significance. Statistical analysis (2-way ANOVA) of these findings revealed significant interactions between host sex and Hla for each cytokine (IL-1β, p=0.0235; TNFα, p= 0.0132; IL-6, p=0.0391, CXCL1, p=0.0088 and IL-10, p=0.0258). These findings, together with sex- and Hla-dependent differences in pathogenesis and bacterial clearance, demonstrate that interactions between host sex and S. aureus expression of Hla mediate innate sex bias in murine models of S. aureus SSTI.

Females are innately resistant to Hla-mediated inflammation and pathogenesis

Hla pore formation in host cell membranes leads to NLRP3 inflammasome activation, resulting in caspase-1 cleavage and activation, and cleavage and secretion of the mature inflammatory cytokine IL-1β (42, 43). Notably, estrogen-mediated suppression of inflammasome activation in another disease model has been reported (44). To gain insight into the lower levels of IL-1β in the skin of LAC-infected female versus male mice, we measured local transcription of inflammasome component genes nlrp3 and asc, as well as casp1 and il-1β, at different time points post-infection. Transcription of nlrp3 was significantly reduced at the site of infection on days 1 and 3, as was il-1β on day 3 post-infection, in females relative to males (Figure 3A, B, Supplementary Figure S3). In contrast, there was no difference in transcript levels of asc and casp1 between the sexes at either time point (Supplemental Figure S3C). However, western blot analyses showed that although there was no difference in infection site levels of pro-caspase 1 or pro-IL-1β between LAC-infected males and females (Figure 3C–F), both active caspase-1 and mature IL-1β levels (45) were significantly reduced in the females. Together, differences in local transcription of nlrp3 and il-1β, reduced cleavage of caspase-1 and IL-1β and reduced IL-1β secretion in the skin of LAC-infected female versus male mice, suggests the potential for sex-dependent regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in response to S. aureus infection.

Figure 3. Markers of NLRP3 inflammasome activation are reduced in female mice during S. aureus skin infection compared to males.

Figure 3

C57BL/6J mice were infected as described in Figure 1. (A) nlrp3 and (B) il-1β gene induction at the site of infection relative to infected males. Day one n=3–4; day three n=7–8 mice per group. (C–F) Immunoblotting and quantification of band intensity relative to total protein for (C, D) pro- and active-caspase-1 and (E, F) pro- and mature-IL-1β in day 3 infection site homogenate (n=3 mice per group). Data are mean ± SEM. Unpaired t-test; ns, not significant; *p<0.05; ** p<0.01.

The well-characterized role of Hla in NLRP3 inflammasome activation, together with potential differences in regulation of inflammasome activation, suggested that females would be innately resistant to Hla-mediated pathogenesis, independent of the presence of S. aureus. To address this, we subcutaneously injected male and female mice with purified Hla. Compared to males, female mice displayed a greater than 4-fold reduction in dermonecrosis on day 3 post-injection (Figure 4A,B). Histologically, lesions consisted of clearly defined regions of epidermal and dermal necrosis, with a mild granulocytic infiltrate in the dermis; no abscessation was seen (Figure 4C). These lesions were observed in all male mice treated with Hla, but in only a single female mouse. Thus, there were marked differences between the two sexes in average length of epidermal necrosis (14.14±1.81 vs 0.38±0.92 mm, p<0.0001) and average area of dermal necrosis (2.83±0.83 vs 0.04±0.11 mm2, p=0.0004). Compared to males, female mice also had significantly reduced local inflammatory cytokine levels on both days 1 and 3 post-injection (Figure 4D), whereas IL-10 levels were below the limit of detection (data not shown). Overall, our findings demonstrate sex-specific innate resistance to Hla-mediated pathogenesis.

Figure 4. Hla-induced dermonecrosis and inflammatory cytokine production is reduced in female mice compared to males.

Figure 4

C57BL/6J mice were subcutaneously injected with 1 µg Hla. Day 1 and 3 post-injection (A) representative injection site images, (B) dermonecrosis and (C) histologic appearance of Hla-induced lesions in male (upper panel) and female (lower panel) skin on day 3 post-injection. The arrowhead marks the junction between viable and necrotic epidermis and the asterisk indicates the area of dermal necrosis in the male skin. Black material located above the epidermis in the female skin is a marker indicating the site of Hla injection; marking was performed because no gross lesions developed. Note the marked difference between the sexes in the severity of the lesions and the absence of abscessation in either sex. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. (D) Day 1 and 3 cytokine levels in clarified injection site homogenate. n=10–14 mice per group from at least three independent experiments. Histology only, n=6 mice per group. Data are mean ± SEM. Mann-Whitney test; *, p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.

Estrogen promotes innate resistance to S. aureus SSTI in female mice

Estrogen is known to support wound healing as well as modulate trafficking and function of innate immune cells important for bacterial clearance (9, 10, 12, 4650), suggesting that ovariectomy would reduce protection during S. aureus SSTI. To test this, female mice were ovariectomized (OVX) or given a sham operation (SO), and allowed to recover for approximately 10 weeks (25, 34) prior to subcutaneous infection with S. aureus. Consistent with a role for estrogen in innate resistance to S. aureus SSTI, OVX mice displayed increased dermonecrosis (1.7-fold) compared to SO mice, as well as slightly increased local bacterial burden (7.5 to 8.0 log CFUs) (Figure 5A, B). Importantly, short-term treatment of OVX mice with exogenous estrogen in the form of 17β-estradiol (E2) restored protection against S. aureus dermonecrosis and reduced weight loss (Figure 5C–E), although there was no significant difference in bacterial burden with short-term E2 administration (Figure 5F). Furthermore, as expected based on differences in dermonecrosis, local inflammatory cytokine levels were increased in OVX mice and reduced with E2 treatment (Figure 5G). In contrast to OVX mice, E2 treatment of SO mice did not further improve disease outcome (Figure 5C–F), suggesting a threshold for E2-mediated protection in females. Furthermore, short-term treatment of male mice with E2 did not limit the severity of S. aureus SSTI (Supplemental Figure S4A–C), possibly due to the suppressive effects of testosterone on the immune response (51, 52). Therefore, together with the absence of direct effects of E2 on S. aureus growth (Supplemental Figure S4D), these findings demonstrate that estrogen is an important regulator of the female innate response to S. aureus pathogenesis.

Figure 5. Ovariectomy impairs and estrogen restores female innate resistance to S. aureus dermonecrosis.

Figure 5

(97) Female C57BL/6J mice were ovariectomized (OVX) or underwent sham operations (SO). After recovery, mice were subcutaneously infected with 2 × 107 CFUs USA300 LAC. Day 3 post-infection (A) dermonecrosis and (B) bacterial burden at the site of infection in untreated mice (n=11 mice per group from three independent experiments). Data are mean ± SEM. Unpaired t-test. (C–G) OVX and SO mice received 10 µg/kg 17β-estradiol (E2) or vehicle control (i.p.) (C–G) on day −2 through day +2 relative to infection with LAC. (C) Representative images of infection site, day 3 post-infection (D) dermonecrosis (ANOVA p=0.0164), (E) percent weight change (ANOVA, <0.0001) and (F) bacterial burden at the site of infection (ANOVA, ns) (n=3 mice/group representative of two independent experiments). Data are mean ± SEM. Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test. (G) Day 3 cytokine levels in clarified infection site homogenate, ANOVA p=0.0284 (IL-1β), 0.0044 (TNFα), 0.0212 (IL-6) and 0.0001 (CXCL1) (n= 3 mice per group). Dunn’s Multiple Comparison test; * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001; **** p<0.0001.

Neutrophil bactericidal capacity against S. aureus is sex-dependent

Neutrophils are critical for clearance of S. aureus (27), and both sex- and hormone-specific differences in neutrophil trafficking and responses to exogenous stimulation have been reported (50, 5357). Excessive neutrophil accumulation, however, can contribute to inflammation resulting in pathogenic effects (36, 58, 59). Given the differences in day 7 bacterial burden between male and female mice infected with LAC (Figure 2C), but not with LACΔhla, we first asked whether this was associated with differences in neutrophil presence at the site of infection. To address this, we measured myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels at the site of infection, which is widely used as a marker for phagocyte, frequently neutrophil, presence (60). We found that MPO levels were reduced in the skin of LAC-infected females versus males on both days 3 and 7 post-infection (Figure 6A). However, the opposite was observed in LACΔhla-infected mice, with MPO significantly increased (day 7) in females compared to males. While these differences could result from varying rates of phagocyte influx or clearance between the sexes, they suggest that increased bacterial clearance in LAC-infected female mice is not dependent on a sustained, elevated phagocyte presence at the site of infection.

Figure 6. Neutrophils from female mice have increased S. aureus bactericidal capacity versus neutrophils from males.

Figure 6

(A) MPO levels in infection site homogenate on day3 (left) and day 7 (right) post-infection (n=7–10 mice per group from two independent experiments). Day 3, Unpaired t-test, Day 7 -ANOVA (p<0.0001) with Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test, *p<0.05; ***p< 0.001. (B) Phagocytosis and killing (1 h) of LAC by bone marrow neutrophils (MOI=1) collected from male and female C57BL/6J mice. (C) Local MPO levels from OVX and SO C57BL/6J mice on day 3 post-LAC infection. (D) LAC phagocytosis and killing (at 1 hour) by bone marrow neutrophils (MOI=1) collected from OVX and SO C57BL/6J mice. (E) Phagocytosis and killing (1 h) of LACΔhla by bone marrow neutrophils collected from male and female C57BL/6J mice. The starting inoculum was set to 100% for phagocytosis assays (left). For percent killing, the number of bacteria phagocytosed was set to 100% (n ≥ 3 mice per group). Data are mean ± SEM. Unpaired t-test; *p<0.05; ** p< 0.01; *** p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.

Given the importance of neutrophils for clearance of S. aureus (27), increased S. aureus clearance despite reduced MPO levels in LAC-infected female versus male mice could result from differences in neutrophil bactericidal capacity. To determine whether neutrophils from female mice are more efficient at clearing S. aureus compared to those from male mice, we isolated bone marrow neutrophils and assessed phagocytosis and killing of S. aureus ex vivo. Consistent with our in vivo data, female neutrophils showed significantly increased phagocytosis (1.5-fold) and killing (percent phagocytosed bacteria killed) of LAC compared to males (Figure 6B), resulting in a 2.2-fold reduction in CFUs. Similar to findings in male versus female mice, OVX mice also had higher local MPO levels on day 3 post-infection compared to SO controls, and neutrophils collected from OVX females had reduced ex vivo bactericidal efficacy compared to those from SO mice (Figure 6C, D). Neutrophils from females also showed increased phagocytosis of LACΔhla (1.5-fold) and total CFUs killed (1.4-fold) compared to males, although the percent of phagocytosed bacteria killed did not vary (Figure 6E). However, neutrophils from both sexes were better able to kill S. aureus ex vivo in the absence of Hla (Figure 6B, D). This suggests that other factors, such as increased inflammatory cytokine production in LACΔhla- versus LAC-infected females, may have contributed to equivalent bacterial clearance in male and female mice infected with LACΔhla (Figure 2C, Supplemental Figure S2E). Alternatively, expression of Hla and similarly regulated virulence factors following phagocytosis of S. aureus by human neutrophils has been shown to contribute to cell lysis (61). Whether murine neutrophil function is impacted by these factors in vivo, and whether female neutrophils are uniquely resistant to such effects compared to male neutrophils, is unclear. Regardless, these results indicate that sex-dependent differences in neutrophil bactericidal capacity may also contribute to the innate sex bias in S. aureus SSTI.

DISCUSSION

Despite epidemiological evidence of sex differences in infectious diseases and the ability of sex steroids to differentially regulate immune cells (13, 14), the biological impact of sex and sex hormones on mechanisms of infection susceptibility and pathogenesis have been largely understudied. Here we used a murine infection model to show that female sex, via the sex hormone estrogen, provides innate resistance to SSTI caused by the important human pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus. Remarkably, this resistance is mediated by significant interactions between host sex and the S. aureus-secreted virulence factor, Hla. We found suppressed inflammation in the skin of female vs male mice infected with an Hla-producing isolate of S. aureus - suppression which was lost when infected with an isogenic Hla deletion mutant. This differential response was conserved following injection with Hla alone, demonstrating a direct, sex-specific response to Hla, independent of bacterial burden. Together, these findings suggest that sex-specific differences in skin innate responsiveness to Hla play an important role in limiting S. aureus SSTI in females. In this era of growing antibiotic resistance, a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving this sex bias may reveal novel therapeutic approaches to promote host innate defense against infection.

Epidemiological studies have shown pathogen-specific sex bias in susceptibility and severity of a variety of infectious diseases (14, 15, 6264). However, such reports outnumber research studies aimed at defining the physiological mechanisms driving these differences in infection susceptibility. Regarding S. aureus, males, as well as females using hormonal contraception, show increased S. aureus nasal colonization rates compared to females not on hormonal contraceptives (65). Given that colonization is associated with increased risk of infection, perhaps it is not surprising that males have an increased incidence of S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) versus females (23, 6669). However, females have increased risk of mortality from SAB, with reports on MRSA and community-acquired SAB showing higher 7- and 30-day mortality rates, respectively, for female versus male patients (23, 70, 71). Consistent with this epidemiological data showing human females are more likely to die from SAB, female mice show reduced survival following intravenous S. aureus infection compared to males (72), and administration of exogenous estrogen to females further increased mortality compared to vehicle-treated controls (73). In contrast, male rabbits were more susceptible than females in a lethal subcutaneous implant infection model using a toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1) producing S. aureus isolate (74). In this model, neutering or estrogen administration reduced lethality in male rabbits (74, 75), whereas spaying increased infection lethality in females (74), pointing to the powerful contributions of sex steroid hormones on infection susceptibility and disease progression. Similarly, compared to placebo-treated OVX controls, E2 administration to OVX mice protected against S. aureus arthritis and bone loss without affecting bacterial burden (76). More recently, Corriden et al. reported on a mouse model of systemic S. aureus infection in which tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist, increased survival and enhanced bacterial clearance (77). This outcome was attributed to tamoxifen’s effects on neutrophil migration and function, including enhanced formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Interestingly, the ability of tamoxifen to enhance neutrophil function resulted from an increase in intracellular ceramide production and was independent of estrogen receptors. Here, we demonstrate male sex bias in S. aureus SSTI and show that sex-specific and estrogen-dependent differences in skin innate responsiveness to Hla drive this bias. It will be important in future studies to investigate sex-specific regulation of the inflammatory response to Hla ex vivo in murine resident skin cells, as well as validating our findings using human neutrophils and skin from both sexes. To better characterize the role of E2 in defense against S. aureus pathogenesis, it will also be revealing to perform more extensive studies using SO and OVX mice, together with short-term E2 administration, at additional time points post-infection using LAC versus LACΔhla or injection with Hla. Also, given the sex difference in ex vivo killing of S. aureus by murine neutrophils and the findings of Corriden, et al. (77), it will be important to explore sex-specific and estrogen-dependent differences in murine and human neutrophil chemotaxis and NET formation. Meanwhile, the work reported here, focused on SSTI as the most common form of S. aureus infection (78), expands our understanding of host-pathogen interactions in S. aureus-mediated disease. Furthermore, the male sex bias in susceptibility to S. aureus SSTI or bacteremia, together with the female bias towards mortality with SAB, may suggest that sex bias varies not only by pathogen, but also by the type and severity of infection.

As the first line of defense against exogenous insult, skin plays a crucial role in the host immune response (7, 8) and sex steroids regulate many aspects of skin physiology. These hormones, specifically androgens such as testosterone in males and estrogens in females, contribute to skin architecture, including differences in epidermal and dermal thickness, as well as to immune system function (7981). With respect to SSTI, differences in both the resolution of infection and subsequent tissue restoration or wound healing likely contribute to disease severity. Interestingly, innate sex differences in the skin are perhaps most apparent in the accelerated wound healing ability of females versus males (82). Inhibition of cutaneous wound healing and enhanced inflammation in males has been attributed to testosterone and the androgen receptor (AR) (83). In contrast, intact female or ovariectomized mice treated with estrogen show accelerated wound healing and reduced inflammation (12). Similarly, in humans, topical estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing in elderly male and female patients, a finding associated with reduced neutrophil influx and increased fibronectin levels (84). Here, we show that short-term administration of E2 to ovariectomized mice restores protection against S. aureus dermonecrosis, further demonstrating the protective role that estrogen plays in the skin. Notably, a recent investigation into the female prevalence of autoimmune diseases identified an associated female-biased transcriptomic signature in the skin that is independent of sex steroid levels (85, 86). Whether such a transcription system independently contributes to female protection against infectious diseases of the skin, and whether it can be exploited to enhance host defense against SSTI, warrants further investigation.

Sex steroids are known to differentially modulate host immune responses, with estrogens being broadly associated with immunoenhancement and androgens with immunosuppression (3, 51, 87, 88). However, a detailed understanding of the cells and signaling pathways contributing to innate sex bias in susceptibility to a range of infectious diseases remains lacking (2, 14, 64). Estradiol (E2), the predominant form of estrogen produced by females, signals by binding the cytosolic/nuclear estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ, as well as the non-canonical membrane bound G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) (8992). Signaling through each receptor can result in rapid, non-genomic effects such as calcium mobilization and cAMP production, as well as slower transcriptional (genomic) effects mediated by ERα and ERβ binding to gene promoters containing estrogen response elements (ERE) or via downstream GPER activation of transcription factors. Estrogen receptor signaling is further complicated by far ranging but varying cell distributions, as well as differences in expression levels and the existence of different isoforms of ERα and ERβ (9094). Similarly, androgens signal through the AR, a ligand-inducible transcription factor that regulates gene expression by binding to androgen response elements (ARE) (95). Given the complexity of hormone signaling in vivo, particularly in the context of an intact immune system, it is unlikely that protection against an invading pathogen can be attributed to a single hormone or receptor. Rather, it is likely that the estrogen-mediated innate protection against S. aureus SSTI in female mice reported here results from a complex interplay among these receptors and their signaling pathways. Therefore, future studies must seek to unravel the molecular mechanisms controlling innate protection in females.

The biological impact of sex and sex hormones on disease susceptibility and treatment has historically been understudied. Fortunately, recent years have witnessed a growing recognition of this gap (4, 5), culminating in the recent National Institutes of Health call that sex be addressed as a biological variable in NIH-funded research (96). In addition to expanding our understanding of host-pathogen interactions in S. aureus-mediated disease, this work further highlights the significant contributions of sex and sex hormones to infectious disease susceptibility and severity.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by research grants from the National Institutes of Health to PRH (AI091917, AI128159) and ERP (CA127731, CA163890 and CA194496), and utilized services and facilities provided through the NIH-funded University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center (UL1TR001449). Research in this paper was also supported by the Human Tissue Repository and Tissue Analysis Shared Resource, funded by the Department of Pathology, The University of New Mexico Cancer Center and NCI 2P30CA118100.

References

  • 1.Klein SL. The effects of hormones on sex differences in infection: from genes to behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000;24:627–638. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00027-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Garcia-Gomez E, Gonzalez-Pedrajo B, Camacho-Arroyo I. Role of sex steroid hormones in bacterial-host interactions. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:928290. doi: 10.1155/2013/928290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kovats S. Estrogen receptors regulate innate immune cells and signaling pathways. Cell Immunol. 2015;294:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clayton JA, Collins FS. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature. 2014;509:282–283. doi: 10.1038/509282a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sandberg K, Umans JG G. Georgetown Consensus Conference Work. Recommendations concerning the new U.S. National Institutes of Health initiative to balance the sex of cells and animals in preclinical research. FASEB J. 2015;29:1646–1652. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-269548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kong BY, Haugh IM, Schlosser BJ, Getsios S, Paller AS. Mind the Gap: Sex Bias in Basic Skin Research. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136:12–14. doi: 10.1038/JID.2015.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nestle FO, Di Meglio P, Qin JZ, Nickoloff BJ. Skin immune sentinels in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:679–691. doi: 10.1038/nri2622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kupper TS, Fuhlbrigge RC. Immune surveillance in the skin: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:211–222. doi: 10.1038/nri1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campbell L, Emmerson E, Davies F, Gilliver SC, Krust A, Chambon P, Ashcroft GS, Hardman MJ. Estrogen promotes cutaneous wound healing via estrogen receptor beta independent of its antiinflammatory activities. J Exp Med. 2010;207:1825–1833. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Emmerson E, Rando G, Meda C, Campbell L, Maggi A, Hardman MJ. Estrogen receptor-mediated signalling in female mice is locally activated in response to wounding. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;375:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilliver SC, Emmerson E, Campbell L, Chambon P, Hardman MJ, Ashcroft GS. 17beta-estradiol inhibits wound healing in male mice via estrogen receptor-alpha. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:2707–2721. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hardman MJ, Emmerson E, Campbell L, Ashcroft GS. Selective estrogen receptor modulators accelerate cutaneous wound healing in ovariectomized female mice. Endocrinology. 2008;149:551–557. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lee GC, Boyd NK, Lawson KA, Frei CR. Incidence and Cost of Skin and soft Tissue Infections In the united States. Value in Health. 2015:18. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McClelland EE, Smith JM. Gender specific differences in the immune response to infection. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2011;59:203–213. doi: 10.1007/s00005-011-0124-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.vom Steeg LG, Klein SL. SeXX Matters in Infectious Disease Pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005374. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Talan DA, Group EMINS. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:666–674. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Talan DA, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, Limbago B, Albrecht V, Moran GJ, Group EMINS. Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft-tissue infections in US emergency department patients, 2004 and 2008. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:144–149. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ray GT, Suaya JA, Baxter R. Microbiology of skin and soft tissue infections in the age of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kennedy AD, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Gardner DJ, Long D, Whitney AR, Braughton KR, Schneewind O, DeLeo FR. Targeting of alpha-hemolysin by active or passive immunization decreases severity of USA300 skin infection in a mouse model. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1050–1058. doi: 10.1086/656043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Malachowa N, Kobayashi SD, Braughton KR, DeLeo FR. Mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1031:109–116. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-481-4_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Inoshima N, Wang Y, Bubeck Wardenburg J. Genetic requirement for ADAM10 in severe Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:1513–1516. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kobayashi SD, Malachowa N, Whitney AR, Braughton KR, Gardner DJ, Long D, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Schneewind O, Otto M, Deleo FR. Comparative analysis of USA300 virulence determinants in a rabbit model of skin and soft tissue infection. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:937–941. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Humphreys H, Fitzpatick F, Harvey BJ. Gender Differences in Rates of Carriage and Bloodstream Infection Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Real, Do They Matter and Why? Clin Infect Dis. 2015 doi: 10.1093/cid/civ576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Saia RS, Garcia FM, Carnio EC. Estradiol protects female rats against sepsis induced by Enterococcus facealis improving leukocyte bactericidal activity. Steroids. 2015;102:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang Z, Huang YC, Koziel H, de Crom R, Ruetten H, Wohlfart P, Thomsen RW, Kahlert JA, Sorensen HT, Jozefowski S, Colby A, Kobzik L. Female resistance to pneumonia identifies lung macrophage nitric oxide synthase-3 as a therapeutic target. Elife. 2014:3. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tkaczyk C, Hamilton MM, Datta V, Yang XP, Hilliard JJ, Stephens GL, Sadowska A, Hua L, O’Day T, Suzich J, Stover CK, Sellman BR. Staphylococcus aureus alpha toxin suppresses effective innate and adaptive immune responses in a murine dermonecrosis model. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rigby KM, DeLeo FR. Neutrophils in innate host defense against Staphylococcus aureus infections. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34:237–259. doi: 10.1007/s00281-011-0295-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miller LG, Eisenberg DF, Liu H, Chang CL, Wang Y, Luthra R, Wallace A, Fang C, Singer J, Suaya JA. Incidence of skin and soft tissue infections in ambulatory and inpatient settings, 2005–2010. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:362. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1071-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Edelsberg J, Taneja C, Zervos M, Haque N, Moore C, Reyes K, Spalding J, Jiang J, Oster G. Trends in US hospital admissions for skin and soft tissue infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1516–1518. doi: 10.3201/eid1509.081228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.ICD - ICD-9-CM - International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm.
  • 31.Rothfork JM, Dessus-Babus S, Wamel WJV, Cheung AL, Gresham HD. Fibrinogen depletion attenuates Staphylococcus aureus infection by preventing density-dependent virulence gene up-regulation. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 2003;171:5389–5395. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.10.5389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academies Press; US: 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Animal Welfare Act | Animal Welfare Information Center | NAL | USDA 2017. Available from: https://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/animal-welfare-act.
  • 34.Chakraborty TR, Gore AC. Aging-related changes in ovarian hormones, their receptors, and neuroendocrine function. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004;229:977–987. doi: 10.1177/153537020422901001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Castleman MJ, Febbraio M, Hall PR. CD36 Is Essential for Regulation of the Host Innate Response to Staphylococcus aureus alpha-Toxin-Mediated Dermonecrosis. J Immunol. 2015;195:2294–2302. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Public health dispatch: outbreaks of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections--Los Angeles County, California, 2002–2003. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2003;29:110–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cho JS, Guo Y, Ramos RI, Hebroni F, Plaisier SB, Xuan C, Granick JL, Matsushima H, Takashima A, Iwakura Y, Cheung AL, Cheng G, Lee DJ, Simon SI, Miller LS. Neutrophil-derived IL-1beta is sufficient for abscess formation in immunity against Staphylococcus aureus in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1003047. doi: 10.1371/ppat.1003047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ferrante A, Martin AJ, Bates EJ, Goh DH, Harvey DP, Parsons D, Rathjen DA, Russ G, Dayer JM. Killing of Staphylococcus aureus by tumor necrosis factor-alpha-activated neutrophils. The role of serum opsonins, integrin receptors, respiratory burst, and degranulation. J Immunol. 1993;151:4821–4828. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Montgomery CP, Daniels MD, Zhao F, Spellberg B, Chong AS, Daum RS. Local inflammation exacerbates the severity of Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bubeck Wardenburg J, Bae T, Otto M, Deleo FR, Schneewind O. Poring over pores: alpha-hemolysin and Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Nat Med. 2007;13:1405–1406. doi: 10.1038/nm1207-1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mariathasan S, Weiss DS, Newton K, McBride J, O’Rourke K, Roose-Girma M, Lee WP, Weinrauch Y, Monack DM, Dixit VM. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature. 2006;440:228–232. doi: 10.1038/nature04515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gurcel L, Abrami L, Girardin S, Tschopp J, van der Goot FG. Caspase-1 activation of lipid metabolic pathways in response to bacterial pore-forming toxins promotes cell survival. Cell. 2006;126:1135–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thakkar R, Wang R, Sareddy G, Wang J, Thiruvaiyaru D, Vadlamudi R, Zhang Q, Brann D. NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in the Brain after Global Cerebral Ischemia and Regulation by 17beta-Estradiol. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:8309031. doi: 10.1155/2016/8309031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Munoz-Planillo R, Franchi L, Miller LS, Nunez G. A critical role for hemolysins and bacterial lipoproteins in Staphylococcus aureus-induced activation of the Nlrp3 inflammasome. J Immunol. 2009;183:3942–3948. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bekesi G, Tulassay Z, Racz K, Feher J, Szekacs B, Kakucs R, Dinya E, Riss E, Magyar Z., Jr The effect of estrogens on superoxide anion generation by human neutrophil granulocytes: possible consequences of the antioxidant defense. Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology. 2007;23:451–454. doi: 10.1080/09513590701483951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stark J, Varga Z, Ghidan A, Vajdovich P, Szombath D, Marczell I, Varbiro S, Dinya E, Magyar T, Tulassay Z, Szekacs B, Nagy K, Racz K, Bekesi G. The effect of indomethacin, myeloperoxidase, and certain steroid hormones on bactericidal activity: an ex vivo and in vivo experimental study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13:27. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-13-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bekesi G, Kakucs R, Varbiro S, Racz K, Sprintz D, Feher J, Szekacs B. In vitro effects of different steroid hormones on superoxide anion production of human neutrophil granulocytes. Steroids. 2000;65:889–894. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00183-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bekesi G, Kakucs R, Varbiro S, Feher J, Pazmany T, Magyar Z, Sprintz D, Szekacs B. Induced myeloperoxidase activity and related superoxide inhibition during hormone replacement therapy. BJOG. 2001;108:474–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ito I, Hayashi T, Yamada K, Kuzuya M, Naito M, Iguchi A. Physiological concentration of estradiol inhibits polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis via a receptor mediated system. Life Sci. 1995;56:2247–2253. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(95)00214-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lai JJ, Lai KP, Zeng W, Chuang KH, Altuwaijri S, Chang C. Androgen receptor influences on body defense system via modulation of innate and adaptive immune systems: lessons from conditional AR knockout mice. Am J Pathol. 2012;181:1504–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Trigunaite A, Dimo J, Jorgensen TN. Suppressive effects of androgens on the immune system. Cell Immunol. 2015;294:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Buyon JP, Korchak HM, Rutherford LE, Ganguly M, Weissmann G. Female hormones reduce neutrophil responsiveness in vitro. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:623–630. doi: 10.1002/art.1780270604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Toth B, Schwacha MG, Kuebler JF, Bland KI, Wang P, Chaudrya IH. Gender dimorphism in neutrophil priming and activation following trauma-hemorrhagic shock. Int J Mol Med. 2003;11:357–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cid MC, Kleinman HK, Grant DS, Schnaper HW, Fauci AS, Hoffman GS. Estradiol enhances leukocyte binding to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-stimulated endothelial cells via an increase in TNF-induced adhesion molecules E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule type 1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule type 1. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:17–25. doi: 10.1172/jci116941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Miyagi M, Aoyama H, Morishita M, Iwamoto Y. Effects of sex hormones on chemotaxis of human peripheral polymorphonuclear leukocytes and monocytes. J Periodontol. 1992;63:28–32. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Spitzer JA, Zhang P. Gender differences in neutrophil function and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant generation in endotoxic rats. Inflammation. 1996;20:485–498. doi: 10.1007/BF01487041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Henson PM, Johnston RB., Jr Tissue injury in inflammation. Oxidants, proteinases, and cationic proteins. J Clin Invest. 1987;79:669–674. doi: 10.1172/JCI112869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Raucci A, Palumbo R, Bianchi ME. HMGB1: a signal of necrosis. Autoimmunity. 2007;40:285–289. doi: 10.1080/08916930701356978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cho JS, Guo Y, Ramos RI, Hebroni F, Plaisier SB, Xuan C, Granick JL, Matsushima H, Takashima A, Iwakura Y, Cheung AL, Cheng G, Lee DJ, Simon SI, Miller LS. Neutrophil-derived IL-1beta is sufficient for abscess formation in immunity against Staphylococcus aureus in mice. PLoS pathogens. 2012:8. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pang YY, Schwartz J, Thoendel M, Ackermann LW, Horswill AR, Nauseef WM. agr-Dependent interactions of Staphylococcus aureus USA300 with human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. J Innate Immun. 2010;2:546–559. doi: 10.1159/000319855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Garenne M. Demographic evidence of sex differences in vulnerability to infectious diseases. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:331–332. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Guerra-Silveira F, Abad-Franch F. Sex bias in infectious disease epidemiology: patterns and processes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Galligan CL, Fish EN. Sex Differences in the Immune Response. In: Klein SL, CW Roberts, editors. Sex and Gender Differences in Infection and Treatments for Infectious Diseases. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zanger P, Nurjadi D, Gaile M, Gabrysch S, Kremsner PG. Hormonal contraceptive use and persistent Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1625–1632. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Allard C, Carignan A, Bergevin M, Boulais I, Tremblay V, Robichaud P, Duperval R, Pepin J. Secular changes in incidence and mortality associated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Quebec, Canada, 1991–2005. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:421–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01965.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Benfield T, Espersen F, Frimodt-Moller N, Jensen AG, Larsen AR, Pallesen LV, Skov R, Westh H, Skinhoj P. Increasing incidence but decreasing in-hospital mortality of adult Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia between 1981 and 2000. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:257–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Laupland KB, Lyytikainen O, Sogaard M, Kennedy KJ, Knudsen JD, Ostergaard C, Galbraith JC, Valiquette L, Jacobsson G, Collignon P, Schonheyder HC C. 743 International Bacteremia Surveillance. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a multinational population-based surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:465–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03903.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG., Jr Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:603–661. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00134-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lamagni TL, Potz N, Powell D, Pebody R, Wilson J, Duckworth G. Mortality in patients with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia, England 2004–2005. J Hosp Infect. 2011;77:16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Smit J, Lopez-Cortes LE, Kaasch AJ, Sogaard M, Thomsen RW, Schonheyder HC, Rodriguez-Bano J, Nielsen H. Gender differences in the outcome of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a historical population-based cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yanke SJ, Olson ME, Davies HD, Hart DA. A CD-1 mouse model of infection with Staphylococcus aureus: influence of gender on infection with MRSA and MSSA isolates. Can J Microbiol. 2000;46:920–926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Toivanen P. Enhancement of staphylococcal infection in mice by estrogens. I. Effect of the timing, quantity and quality of the hormone. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn. 1967;45:138–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Best GK, Scott DF, Kling JM, Crowell WF, Kirkland JJ. Enhanced susceptibility of male rabbits to infection with a toxic shock strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1984;46:727–732. doi: 10.1128/iai.46.3.727-732.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Best GK, Abney TO, Kling JM, Kirkland JJ, Scott DF. Hormonal influence on experimental infections by a toxic shock strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1986;52:331–333. doi: 10.1128/iai.52.1.331-333.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gjertsson I, Lagerquist MK, Kristiansson E, Carlsten H, Lindholm C. Estradiol ameliorates arthritis and protects against systemic bone loss in Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14:R76. doi: 10.1186/ar3799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Corriden R, Hollands A, Olson J, Derieux J, Lopez J, Chang JT, Gonzalez DJ, Nizet V. Tamoxifen augments the innate immune function of neutrophils through modulation of intracellular ceramide. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8369. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tong SY, Chen LF, Fowler VG. Colonization, pathogenicity, host susceptibility, and therapeutics for Staphylococcus aureus: what is the clinical relevance? Seminars in immunopathology. 2012;34:185–200. doi: 10.1007/s00281-011-0300-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Dao H, Jr, Kazin RA. Gender differences in skin: a review of the literature. Gend Med. 2007;4:308–328. doi: 10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Azzi L, El-Alfy M, Martel C, Labrie F. Gender differences in mouse skin morphology and specific effects of sex steroids and dehydroepiandrosterone. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124:22–27. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23545.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Thornton MJ. The biological actions of estrogens on skin. Exp Dermatol. 2002;11:487–502. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2002.110601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Thomason HA, Williams H, Hardman MJ. Sex and Sex Hormones Mediate Wound Healing. In: Klein SL, Roberts CW, editors. Sex and Gender Differences in Infection and Treatments for Infectious Diseases. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 31–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ashcroft GS, Mills SJ. Androgen receptor-mediated inhibition of cutaneous wound healing. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:615–624. doi: 10.1172/JCI15704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ashcroft GS, Greenwell-Wild T, Horan MA, Wahl SM, Ferguson MW. Topical estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing in aged humans associated with an altered inflammatory response. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:1137–1146. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65217-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Liang Y, Tsoi LC, Xing X, Beamer MA, Swindell WR, Sarkar MK, Berthier CC, Stuart PE, Harms PW, Nair RP, Elder JT, Voorhees JJ, Kahlenberg JM, Gudjonsson JE. A gene network regulated by the transcription factor VGLL3 as a promoter of sex-biased autoimmune diseases. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:152–160. doi: 10.1038/ni.3643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Pandit A, Meyaard L, Radstake TR. Is sex bias orchestrated in the skin? Nat Immunol. 2017;18:142–143. doi: 10.1038/ni.3658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:626–638. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Roved J, Westerdahl H, Hasselquist D. Sex differences in immune responses: Hormonal effects, antagonistic selection, and evolutionary consequences. Horm Behav. 2017;88:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kumar S, Lata K, Mukhopadhyay S, Mukherjee TK. Role of estrogen receptors in pro-oxidative and anti-oxidative actions of estrogens: a perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1800:1127–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Prossnitz ER, Barton M. The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7:715–726. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Prossnitz ER, Arterburn JB. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVII. G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor and Its Pharmacologic Modulators. Pharmacological Reviews. 2015;67:505–540. doi: 10.1124/pr.114.009712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Prossnitz ER, Hathaway HJ. What have we learned about GPER function in physiology and disease from knockout mice? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;153:114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Heldring N, Pike A, Andersson S, Matthews J, Cheng G, Hartman J, Tujague M, Ström A, Treuter E, Warner M, Gustafsson J-Å. Estrogen Receptors: How Do They Signal and What Are Their Targets. 2007 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00026.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Leung YK, Mak P, Hassan S, Ho SM. Estrogen receptor (ER)-beta isoforms: a key to understanding ER-beta signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:13162–13167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605676103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Brinkmann AO, Blok LJ, de Ruiter PE, Doesburg P, Steketee K, Berrevoets CA, Trapman J. Mechanisms of androgen receptor activation and function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1999;69:307–313. doi: 10.1016/s0960-0760(99)00049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.NOT-OD-15-102: Consideration of Sex as a Biological Variable in NIH-funded Research 2017. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
  • 97.Garcia-Bonilla L, Park L, Iadecola C. Commentary on Myers et al.: growing role of the innate immunity receptor CD36 in central nervous system diseases. Exp Neurol. 2014;261:633–637. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES